[Pagination of in-text citations follows that of the reprint, where given.]

• Adler, J., 2006, “Withdrawal and Contextualism”, Analysis, 66(4): 280–285. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Contextualism and Fallibility: Pragmatic Encroachment, Possibility, and Strength of Epistemic Position”, Synthese, 188: 247–272. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, “Epistemological Problems of Testimony”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/testimony-episprob/> (Scholar)
• Alston, W. P., 2000, Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
• Annis, D. B., 1978, “A Contextualist Theory of Epistemic Justification”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 15(3): 213–219. (Scholar)
• Austin, J. L., 1946, “Other Minds”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume XX. Reprinted in Austin’s Philosophical Papers, 3^rd edition, 1979. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 76–116. (Scholar)
• Bach, K., 2005, “The Emperor’s New ‘Knows’”, in Preyer and Peter, eds., pp. 51–89. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008, “Applying Pragmatics to Epistemology”, Philosophical Issues, 18: 68–88. (Scholar)
• Beebe, J. R., 2012, “Social Functions of Knowledge Attributions”, in Brown & Gerken (eds.), pp. 220–242. (Scholar)
• Black, T., 2005, “Classic Invariantism, Relevance, and Warranted Assertability Manœuvers”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 55(219): 328–336 (Scholar)
• Blackson, T., 2004, “An Invalid Argument for Contextualism”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 68(2): 344–5. (Scholar)
• Blaauw, M., 2003, “WAMing Away at Contextualism”, Nordic Journal of Philosophy, 4(1): 88–97. (Scholar)
• Blome-Tillman, M., 2009, “Knowledge and Presuppositions”, Mind, 118(470): 241–294. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, Knowledge & Presuppositions, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Brady, M., and D. Pritchard, 2005, “Epistemological Contextualism: Problems and Prospects”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 55(219): 161–171. (Scholar)
• Brandom, R. 1994, Making it Explicit, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Brown, J., 2006, “Contextualism and Warranted Assertibility Manoeuvres”, Philosophical Studies, 130: 407–435. (Scholar)
• –––, and M. Gerken (eds.), 2012, Knowledge Ascriptions, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Campbell, J. C., M. O’Rourke and H. Silverstein (eds.), 2010, Knowledge and Skepticism (Topics in Contemporary Philosophy: Volume 5), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Cappelen, H. and E. Lepore, 2003, “Context Shifting Arguments”, Philosophical Perspectives 17: Language and Philosophical Linguistics: 25–50. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005a, Insensitive Semantics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005b, “A Tall Tale: In Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism”, in Preyer & Peter (eds.), pp. 197–219. (Scholar)
• Castañeda, H., 1980, “The Theory of Questions, Epistemic Powers, and the Indexical Theory of Knowledge”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 5: 193–237. (Scholar)
• Cohen, S., 1986, “Knowledge and Context”, The Journal of Philosophy, 83: 574–583. (Scholar)
• –––, 1987, “Knowledge, Context, and Social Standards”, Synthese, 73: 3–26. (Scholar)
• –––, 1988, “How to be a Fallibilist”, Philosophical Perspectives, Volume 2: 91–123. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998, “Contextualist Solutions to Epistemological Problems: Skepticism, Gettier, and the Lottery”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 76(2): 289–306. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, “Contextualism, Skepticism, and The Structure of Reasons”, Philosophical Perspectives, 13: Epistemology: 57–89. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, “Contextualism Defended: Comments on Richard Feldman’s ‘Skeptical Problems, Contextualist Solutions’”, Philosophical Studies, 103: 87–98. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “Contextualism and Unhappy-Face Solutions: Reply to Schiffer”, Philosophical Studies, 119: 185–97. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, “Knowledge, Speaker, Subject”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 55(219): 199–212 (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, “Contextualism Defended” and “Contextualism Defended Some More”, in Steup, Sosa, and Turri (eds.): 69–75, 79–81. (Scholar)
• Colgrove, N., and T. Dougherty, 2016, “Hawthorne’s Might-y Failure: A Reply to ‘Knowledge and Epistemic Necessity’”, Philosophical Studies, 173(5): 1165–1177. (Scholar)
• Comesaña, J. and P. Klein, 2019,“Skepticism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/skepticism/> (Scholar)
• Conee, E., 2014, “Contextualism Contested” and “Contextualism Contested Some More”, in Steup, Sosa, and Turri (eds.): 60–69, 75–79. (Scholar)
• Craig, E., 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• DeRose, K., 1991, “Epistemic Possibilities”, The Philosophical Review, 100(4): 581–605. (Scholar)
• –––, 1992, “Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 52(4): 913–929. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995, “Solving the Skeptical Problem”, The Philosophical Review, 104(1): 1–52. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, “Contextualism: An Explanation and Defense,” in The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, J. Greco and E. Sosa (eds.), Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 185–203. (Scholar)
• –––, 2000, “Now You Know It, Now You Don’t”, Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy (Philosophy Documentation Center) Vol. V, Epistemology: 91–106. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, “Assertion, Knowledge and Context”, The Philosophical Review, 111(2): 167–203. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004a, “Single Scoreboard Semantics”, Philosophical Studies, 119(1–2): 1–21. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004b, “Sosa, Safety, Sensitivity, and Skeptical Hypotheses,” in Greco (ed.): 22–41. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, “The Ordinary Language Basis for Contextualism and the New Invariantism”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 55(219): 172–198. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, “‘Bamboozled by Our Own Words’: Semantic Blindness and Some Arguments Against Contextualism”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 73(2): 316–338. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context: Vol. 1, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “Contextualism, Contrastivism, and X-Phi Surveys”, Philosophical Studies, 156: 81–110. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, The Appearance of Ignorance: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context: Vol. 2, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Dinges, A., 2016, “Epistemic Invariantism and Contextualist Intuitions”, Episteme, 13(2): 219–232. (Scholar)
• Dodd, D., 2010, “Confusion about Concessive Knowledge Attributions”, Synthese, 172(3): 381–396. (Scholar)
• Dougherty, T., and P. Rysiew, 2009, “Fallibilism, Epistemic Possibility, and Concessive Knowledge Attributions”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 78(1): 123–132. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “Clarity about Concessive Knowledge Attributions: Reply to Dodd”, Synthese, 181(3): 123–132. (Scholar)
• Douven, I., 2006, “Assertion, Knowledge, and Rational Credibility”, Philosophical Review, 115(219): 449–485. (Scholar)
• Dretske, F., 1970, “Epistemic Operators”, The Journal of Philosophy, 67(24): 1007–1023. Reprinted in Dretske, 2000, pp. 30–47. (Scholar)
• –––, 1981a, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Reprinted in 1999, Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
• –––, 1981b, “The Pragmatic Dimension of Knowledge”, Philosophical Studies, 40: 363–378. Reprinted in Dretske, 2000, pp. 48–63. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991, “Knowledge: Sanford and Cohen”, in Dretske and His Critics, B. P. McLaughlin (ed.), Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 185–196. (Scholar)
• –––, 2000, Perception, Knowledge and Belief: Selected Essays, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Egan, A., J. Hawthorne, and B. Weatherson, 2005, “Epistemic Modals in Context”, in Preyer and Peter (eds.): 131–168. (Scholar)
• Fantl, J., and M. McGrath, 2002, “Evidence, Pragmatics, and Justification”, The Philosophical Review, 111: 67–94. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “On Pragmatic Encroachment in Epistemology”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 75(3): 558–589. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, Knowledge in an Uncertain World, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Feldman, R., 1981, “Fallibilism and Knowing that One Knows”, The Philosophical Review, 90(2): 266–282. (Scholar)
• –––, 1997, “Review Essay (Carruthers and Craig)”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57(1): 205–221. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, “Contextualism and Skepticism”, Philosophical Perspectives 1: Epistemology: 91–114. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, “Skeptical Problems, Contextualist Solutions”, Philosophical Studies, 103: 61–85. (A revised version of Feldman 1999.) (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “Comments on DeRose’s ‘Single Scoreboard Semantics’”, Philosophical Studies, 119(1–2): 23–33. (Scholar)
• Gerken, M., 2013, “Epistemic Focal Bias”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 91(1): 41–61. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015, “The Roles of Knowledge Ascriptions in Epistemic Assessment”, European Journal of Philosophy, 23(1): 141–161. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, On Folk Epistemology: How We Think and Talk about Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Goldman, A., 1976, “Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge”, The Journal of Philosophy, 73: 771–791. Reprinted in Goldman 1992, pp. 85–103. (Scholar)
• –––, 1989, “Psychology and Philosophical Analysis”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 89: 195–209. Reprinted in Goldman 1992, pp. 143–153. (Scholar)
• –––, 1992, Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, and C. O’Connor, 2019, “Social Epistemology”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/epistemology-social/> (Scholar)
• Greco, J., 2003, “Knowledge as Credit for True Belief”, in Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology, M. DePaul and L. Zagzebski (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 111–134. (Scholar)
• ––– (ed.), 2004, Ernest Sosa and His Critics, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008,“What’s Wrong with Contextualism?”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 58(232): 416–436. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, Achieving Knowledge, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Grice, H. P., 1989, Studies in the Way of Words, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Hambourger, R., 1987, “Justified Assertion and the Relativity of Knowledge”, Philosophical Studies, 51: 241–269. (Scholar)
• Hannon, R., 2013, “The Practical Origins of Epistemic Contextualism”, Erkenntnis, 78(4): 899–919. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015, “Stabilizing Knowledge”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 96: 116–139. (Scholar)
• Harman, G., 1968, “Knowledge, Inference, and Explanation”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 5:164–173. (Scholar)
• –––, 1980, “Reasoning and Explanatory Coherence”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 17: 151–158. (Scholar)
• Hawthorne, J., 2004, Knowledge and Lotteries, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Knowledge and Epistemic Necessity”, Philosophical Studies, 158: 493–501. (Scholar)
• Hazlett, A., 2007, “Grice’s Razor”, Metaphilosophy, 38(5): 669–690. (Scholar)
• Heller, M., 1995, “The Simple Solution to the Problem of Generality”, Noûs, 29(4): 501–515. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999a, “Relevant Alternatives and Closure”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 77(2): 196–208. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999b, “The Proper Role for Contextualism in an Anti-Luck Epistemology”, Philosophical Perspectives, 13 (Epistemology): 115–129. (Scholar)
• Henderson, D., 2009, “Motivated Contextualism”, Philosophical Studies, 142(1): 119–131. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “Gate-Keeping Contextualism”, Episteme, 8(1): 83–98. (Scholar)
• –––, and T. Horgan 2015, “What’s the Point?”, in Epistemic Evaluation: Purposeful Epistemology, D.K. Henderson and J. Greco (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 87–114. (Scholar)
• Hofweber, T., 1999, “Contextualism and the Meaning-Intention Problem”, in Cognition, Agency and Rationality, K. Korta, E. Sosa, and X. Arrazola (eds.), Dortrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer, pp. 93–104. (Scholar)
• Hookway, C., 1996, “Questions of Context”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 96(Part 1): 1–16. (Scholar)
• Ichikawa, J. J., 2017a, Contextualising Knowledge: Epistemology and Semantics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• ––– (ed.), 2017b, The Routledge Handbook of Contextualism, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• –––, and M. Steup, 2018, “The Analysis of Knowledge”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/knowledge-analysis/> (Scholar)
• Johnsen, B. C., 2001, “Contextualist Swords, Skeptical Plowshares”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 62(2): 385–406. (Scholar)
• Kappel, K., 2010, “On Saying that Someone Knows: Themes from Craig”, in Social Epistemology, A. Haddock, A. Millar, and D. Pritchard (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 69–88. (Scholar)
• Karjalainen, A. and A. Morton, 2003, “Contrastive Knowledge”, Philosophical Explorations, 6(2): 74–89. (Scholar)
• Kelp, C., 2011, “What is the Point of ‘Knowledge’ Anyway?”, Episteme, 8(1): 53–66. (Scholar)
• Klein, P., 2000, “Contextualism and the Real Nature of Academic Skepticism”, Philosophical Issues, 10: 108–16. (Scholar)
• Kompa, N., 2002, “The Context Sensitivity of Knowledge Ascriptions”, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 64: 11–18. (Scholar)
• Kornblith, H., 2000, “The Contextualist Evasion of Epistemology”, Philosophical Issues, 10: 24–32. (Scholar)
• Lackey, J., 2007, “Norms of Assertion”, Noûs, 41(4): 594–628. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Group Knowledge Attributions”, in Brown & Gerken (eds.): 243–269. (Scholar)
• Lawlor, K., 2013, Assurance: An Austinian View of Knowledge and Knowledge Claims, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Leite, A., 2007, “How to Link Assertion and Knowledge Without Going Contextualist: A Reply to DeRose’s ‘Assertion, Knowledge, and Context’”, Philosophical Studies, 134: 111–129. (Scholar)
• Lewis, D., 1979, “Scorekeeping in a Language Game”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8: 339–359. (Scholar)
• –––, 1996, “Elusive Knowledge”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74(4): 549–567. (Scholar)
• Littlejohn, C., 2011, “Concessive Knowledge Attributions and Fallibilism”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 83(3): 603–619. (Scholar)
• Ludlow, P., 2005, “Contextualism and the New Linguistic Turn in Epistemology”, in Preyer and Peter (eds.): pp. 11–50. (Scholar)
• Luper, S., 2020, “Epistemic Closure”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/closure-epistemic/> (Scholar)
• MacFarlane, J., 2005, “The Assessment Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions”, in T. S. Gendler and J. Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.197–233. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and its Applications, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Malcolm, N., 1952, “Knowledge and Belief”, Mind, 61(242): 178–189. (Scholar)
• McKenna, R., 2013, “‘Knowledge’ Ascriptions, Social Roles and Semantics”, Episteme, 10(4): 335–350. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, “Normative Scorekeeping”, Synthese, 191: 607–625. (Scholar)
• McKinnon, R., 2015, The Norms of Assertion: Truth, Lies, and Warrant, Palgrave MacMillan. (Scholar)
• Montminy, M., 2007, “Epistemic Contextualism and the Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction”, Synthese, 155: 99–125. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “Contextualism, Invariantism, and Semantic Blindness”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 87(4): 639–657. (Scholar)
• Moore, G. E., 1993, Commonplace Book 1919–1953, Bristol: Thoemmes Press. (Scholar)
• Nagel, J., 2008, “Knowledge Ascriptions and the Psychological Consequences of Changing Stakes”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 86(2): 279–294. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010a, “Knowledge Ascriptions and the Psychological Consequences of Thinking About Error”, Philosophical Quarterly, 60(239): 286–306. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010b, “Epistemic Anxiety”, Philosophical Perspectives 24: Epistemology: 407–435. (Scholar)
• Neta, R., 2002, “S knows that P,” Noûs, 36(4): 663–681.
• –––, 2003a, “Skepticism, Contextualism, and Semantic Self-Knowledge”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67(2): 397–11. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003b, “Contextualism and the Problem of the External World”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 66(1): 1–31. (Scholar)
• Nozick, R., 1981, Philosophical Explanations, Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Pagin, P., 2016, “Assertion”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <Assertion/">https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/Assertion/> (Scholar)
• Partee, B., 2004, “Comments on Jason Stanley’s ‘On the Linguistic Basis for Contextualism’”, Philosophical Studies, 119(1–2): 147–159. (Scholar)
• Pollock, J. L., 1986, Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. (Scholar)
• Prades, J., 2000, “Skepticism, Contextualism and Closure”, Philosophical Issues, 10: 121–131 (Scholar)
• Preyer, G., and G. Peter (eds.), 2005, Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Pritchard, D., 2000, “Closure and Context”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 78(2): 275–280. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, “Two Forms of Epistemological Contextualism”, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 64: 19–55. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, “Contextualism, Skepticism, and Warranted Assertibility Manoeuvres,” in Campbell et al. (eds.0 : 85–103. (Scholar)
• Pryor, J., 2001, “Highlights of Recent Epistemology”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 52: 95–124. (Scholar)
• Pynn, G., 2015, “Pragmatic Contextualism”, Metaphilosophy, 46(1): 26–51 (Scholar)
• Recanati, F., 1986, “On Defining Communicative Intentions”, Mind & Language, 1(3): 213–42. (Scholar)
• –––, 1989, “The Pragmatics of What is Said”, Mind & Language, 4(4): 295–329. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994, “Contextualism and Anti-Contextualism in the Philosophy of Language”, in Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, S. L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), London and New York: Routledge, pp. 156–166. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, “Literalism and Contextualism: Some Varieties,” in Preyer & Peter (eds.): 171–196. (Scholar)
• Rieber, S., 1998, “Skepticism and Contrastive Explanation”, Noûs, 32(2): 189–204. (Scholar)
• Rorty, R., 1979, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Rysiew, P., 2001, “The Context-Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions”, Noûs, 35(4): 477–514. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, “Contesting Contextualism”, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 69: 51–70 (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Speaking of Knowing”, Noûs, 41(4): 627–662. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “Surveys, Intuitions, Knowledge Attributions”, Philosophical Studies, 156: 111–120. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012a, “Elusive ‘Knowledge’”, Analytic Philosophy, 53(1): 130–138. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012b, “Epistemic Scorekeeping”, in Brown & Gerken (eds.): 270–293. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, “‘Knowledge’ and Pragmatics”, in Ichikawa (ed.): 205–217. (Scholar)
• Schaffer, J., 2004, “From Contextualism to Contrastivism”, Philosophical Studies, 119(1–2): 73–103. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, “What Shifts? Thresholds, Standards, or Alternatives?”, in Preyer and Peter (eds.): 115–130. (Scholar)
• Schiffer, S., 1996, “Contextualist Solutions to Skepticism”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 96: 317–333. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “Skepticism and the Vagaries of Justified Belief,” Philosophical Studies, 103: 161–84. (Scholar)
• Schmitt, F., 1992, “Review of Edward Craig, Knowledge and the State of Nature”, Mind, 101(403): 555–559. (Scholar)
• Searle, J. R., 1980, “The Background of Meaning”, in Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, J. Searle, F. Kiefer, and M. Bierwisch (eds.), Reidel, pp. 221–232. (Scholar)
• Sosa, E., 1964, “The Analysis of ‘S knows that p’”, Analysis, 25:1–8. (Scholar)
• –––, 1986, “On Knowledge and Context”, The Journal of Philosophy, 83: 584–585. (Scholar)
• –––, 1988, “Knowledge in Context, Skepticism in Doubt”, Philosophical Perspectives, Volume 2: 139–155. (Scholar)
• –––, 2000, “Skepticism and Contextualism”, Philosophical Issues, 10: 1–18. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “Replies”, in Greco (ed.): 275–325. (Scholar)
• Stainton, R., 2010, “Contextualism in Epistemology and the Context-Sensitivity of ‘Knows’”, in Campbell et al. (eds.): 137–163. (Scholar)
• Stalnaker, R., 1974, “Pragmatic Presuppositions”, in Semantics and Philosophy, M. Munitz and P. Unger (eds.), New York: New York University Press, pp. 197–214. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, “Common Ground”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 25: 701–721. (Scholar)
• Stanley, J., 2004, “On the Linguistic Basis for Contextualism”, Philosophical Studies, 119(1–2): 119–146. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005a, “Fallibilism and Concessive Knowledge Attributions”, Analysis, 65(2): 126–31. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005b, Knowledge and Practical Interests, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Steup, M., E. Sosa, and J. Turri (eds.), 2014, Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, 2^nd edition, Malden, MA: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Stine, Gail C., 1976, “Skepticism, Relevant Alternatives, and Deductive Closure”, Philosophical Studies, 29: 249–261. (Scholar)
• Travis, C., 2005, “A Sense of Occasion”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 55(219): 286–314. (Scholar)
• Turri, J., 2010, “Epistemic Invariantism and Speech Act Contextualism”, The Philosophical Review, 119(1): 77–95. (Scholar)
• Unger, P., 1975, Ignorance: A Case for Skepticism, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1984, Philosophical Relativity, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
• Vogel, J., 1990, “Are there Counterexamples to the Closure Principle”, in M. Ross and G. Ross (eds.), Doubting: Contemporary Perspectives on Skepticism, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 13–29. (Scholar)
• Weiner, M., 2005, “Must We Know What We Say?”, The Philosophical Review, 114(2): 227–251. (Scholar)
• Williams, M., 1991, Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Skepticism, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, Problems of Knowledge, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Williamson, T., 2005a, “Knowledge, Context, and the Agent’s Point of View”, in Preyer & Peter (eds.): 91–114. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005b, “Contextualism, Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and Knowledge of Knowledge”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 55(219): 213–35. (Scholar)
• –––, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations, Blackwell. (Scholar)
• –––, 1969, On Certainty, Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Wright, C., 2005, “Contextualism and Skepticism: Even-Handedness, Factivity, and Surreptitiously Raising Standards,” The Philosophical Quarterly, 55(219): 236–62. (Scholar)
• Worsnip, A., 2015, “Possibly False Knowledge”, Journal of Philosophy, 112(5): 225–246. (Scholar)
• Yourgrau, P., 1983, “Knowledge and Relevant Alternatives”, Synthese, 55: 175–190. (Scholar)