Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Lady Anne Conway" by Sarah Hutton
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
Primary Sources
- Conway, Anne, Principia philosophiae antiquissimae et recentissimae de Deo,
Christo et Creatura id est de materia et spiritu in genere.
Amsterdam, 1690.
- Conway, Anne, The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy.
London, 1692.
[Principles 1692 available online] (Scholar)
- Conway, Anne, The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern
Philosophy, Allison P. Coudert and Taylor Corse (trans/eds),
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
doi:10.1017/CBO9780511597978
- The Conway Letters: The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess
Conway, Henry More, and Their Friends 1642–1684, Marjorie
Hope Nicolson and Sarah Hutton (eds.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.
doi:10.1093/actrade/9780198248767.book.1 (Scholar)
- Plato, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, edited by Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978 (first published 1961).
Secondary Sources
- Borcherding, Julia, 2019, “Nothing is Simply One Thing: Conway on Multiplicity in Causation and Cognition”, in Causation and Cognition in Early Modern Philosophy, Dominik Perler and Sebastian Bender (eds), (Routledge Studies in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy), London: Routledge, 123–144. (Scholar)
- –––, forthcoming, “Loving the Body, Loving
the Soul. Anne Conway’s Critique of Cartesian and Morean
Dualism”, Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy,
9. (Scholar)
- Boyle, Deborah, 2006, “Spontaneous and Sexual Generation in
Conway’s Principles”, in The Problem of Animal
Generation in Early Modern Philosophy, Justin E. H. Smith (ed.),
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 175–193.
doi:10.1017/cbo9780511498572.009 (Scholar)
- Broad, Jacqueline, 2003, Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511487125 (Scholar)
- Brown, Stuart, 1990, “Leibniz and More’s Cabbalistic
Circle”, in Hutton 1990: 77–95.
doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2267-9_5">10.1007/978-94-009-2267-9_5 (Scholar)
- Coudert, Allison, 1998, The Impact of the Kabbalah in the
Seventeenth Century. The Life and Thought of Francis Mercury van
Helmont, 1614–1698, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
- Detlefsen, Karen, 2018, “Cavendish and Conway on the Individual Human Mind”, in Philosophy of Mind in the Early Modern and Modern Ages, Rebecca Copenhaver (ed.), New York: Routledge, 134–56. (Scholar)
- Duran, Jane, 2006, Eight Women Philosophers. Theory, Politics and Feminism, Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press. (Scholar)
- Gabbey, Alan, 1977, “Anne Conway et Henry More: Lettres sur Descartes”, Archives de Philosophie, 40(3): 379–404. (Scholar)
- Gordon-Roth, Jessica, 2018, “What Kind of Monist Is Anne Finch Conway?”, Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 4(3): 280–297. doi:10.1017/apa.2018.24 (Scholar)
- Grey, John, 2017, “Conway’s Ontological Objection to
Cartesian Dualism”, Philosophers’ Imprint 17.13:
1–9. (Scholar)
- Hutton, Sarah (ed.), 1990, Henry More (1614–1687) Tercentenary Studies, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2267-9 (Scholar)
- –––, 1995, “Anne Conway critique
d’Henry More: l’esprit et la matière”, Archives
de Philosophie, 58(3): 371–384. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511487217 (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “Sir John Finch and Religious
Toleration: An Unpublished Letter to Anne Conway”, in La
Centralita del Dubbio. Un Progetto di Antonio Rotondo, Luisa
Simonutti and Camilla Hernanin (eds.), 2 vols., Florence: Olschki, pp.
287–304. (Scholar)
- –––, 2018, “Goodness in Anne Conway’s
Metaphysics”, in Early Modern Women on Metaphysics,
Emily Thomas (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
229–246. doi:10.1017/9781316827192.013">10.1017/9781316827192.013 (Scholar)
- –––, 2019, “‘As we observe by
continued experience’. Experience and the Senses in the
Philosophy of Anne Conway”, Bruniana e Campanelliana,
supplement on Filosofe e scienzate nel eta moderna,
Sandra Plastina and Emilio Tommaso (eds), 51–64. (Scholar)
- Lascano, Marcy P., 2013, “Anne Conway: Bodies in the Spiritual World”, Philosophy Compass, 8(4): 327–336. doi:10.1111/phc3.12025 (Scholar)
- –––, 2018, “Anne Conway on Liberty”,
in Women and Liberty, 1600–1800: Philosophical Essays,
Jacqueline Broad and Karen Detlefsen (eds), Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 163–77. (Scholar)
- Mercer, Christia, 2012a, “ Knowledge and Suffering in Early Modern Philosophy: G.W. Leibniz and Anne Conway”, in Emotional Minds. The Passions and the Limits of Enquiry in Early Modern Philosophy, Sabrina Ebbersmeyer (ed.), Göttingen: de Gruyter, 179–206. [Mercer 2012 available online] (Scholar)
- –––, 2012b, “Platonism in Early Modern Natural Philosophy: The Case of Leibniz and Anne Conway”, in Neoplatonism and the Philosophy of Nature, James Wilberding and Christoph Horn (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 103–126. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693719.003.0006 (Scholar)
- Merchant, Carolyn, 1979, “The Vitalism of Anne Conway: Its Impact on Leibniz’s Concept of the Monad”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 17(3): 255–269. doi:10.1353/hph.2008.0331 (Scholar)
- O’Neill, Eileen, 1998, “History of Philosophy:
Disappearing Ink: Early Modern Women Philosophers and Their Fate in
History”, in Philosophy in a Feminist Voice: Critiques and
Reconstructions, Janet A. Kourany (ed.), Princeton: Princeton
University Press, 17–62. doi:10.1515/9781400822324.17 (Scholar)
- Platas Benitez, Viridiana, forthcoming, “Percepcion sensible
e imaginacion en la filosofia di Anne Conway”, Annales del
seminario de Historia de Filosofia, Universidad Complutense de
Madrid. (Scholar)
- Popkin, Richard H., 1990, “The Spiritualistic Cosmologies of
Henry More and Anne Conway”, in Hutton 1990: 97–114.
doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2267-9_6 (Scholar)
- Pugliese, Nastassja, 2019, “Monism and Individuation in Anne Conway as a Critique of Spinoza”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 27(4): 771–785. doi:10.1080/09608788.2018.1563764 (Scholar)
- Thomas, Emily, 2017, “Time, Space, and Process in Anne Conway”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 25(5): 990–1010. doi:10.1080/09608788.2017.1302408 (Scholar)
- –––, 2018a, “Anne Conway on the Identity of Creatures over Time”, in Thomas 2018b: 131–149. doi:10.1017/9781316827192.008 (Scholar)
- ––– (ed.), 2018b, Early Modern Women on Metaphysics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316827192 (Scholar)
- –––, forthcoming, “Anne Conway as a Priority Monist: A Reply to Gordon-Roth”, Journal of the American Philosophical Association. [Thomas forthcoming available online] (Scholar)