Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Descriptive Decision Theory" by Jake Chandler
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Allais, Maurice, 1953a, “Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l’Ecole Américaine”, Econometrica, 21(4): 503–546. doi:10.2307/1907921 (Scholar)
- –––, 1953b, “Fondements d’une Théorie Positive des Choix Comportant un Risque et Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de L’Ecole Américaine”, Econométrie, Colloques Internationaux du CNRS, XL: 257–332; page reference is to the translation titled “The Foundations of a Positive Theory of Choice Involving Risk and a Criticism of the Postulates and Axioms of the American School” in Allais & Hagen 1979: 27–145. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7629-1_2">10.1007/978-94-015-7629-1_2 (Scholar)
- Allais, Maurice and Ole Hagen (ed.), 1979, Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox, (Theory and Decision Library, 21), Dordrecht: Reidel. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7629-1 (Scholar)
- Anscombe, F.J., and R.J. Aumann, 1963, “A Definition of Subjective Probability”, Annals of Mathematics and Statistics, 34(1): 199–205. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177704255 (Scholar)
- Anand, Paul, 2009, “Rationality and Intransitive Preference: Foundations for The Modern View”, in Anand, Pattanaik, & Puppe 2009: 156–172. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290420.003.0007 (Scholar)
- Anand, Paul, Prastanta K. Pattanaik, and Clemens Puppe (ed.), 2009, The Handbook of Rational and Social Choice, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290420.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Becker, Selwyn W. and Fred O. Brownson, 1964, “What Price Ambiguity? Or the Role of Ambiguity in Decision-Making”, Journal of Political Economy, 72(1): 62–73. doi:10.1086/258854 (Scholar)
- Becker, Joao L., and Rakesh K. Sarin, 1987, “Lottery Dependent Utility”, Management Science, 33(11): 1367–1382. doi:10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1367 (Scholar)
- Bewley, Truman F., 1986, “Knightian Decision Theory: Part I”, Cowles Foundation discussion paper no. 807. Reprinted with minor changes, 2002, Decisions in Economics and Finance, 25(2): 79–110. doi:10.1007/s102030200006 (Scholar)
- Bleichrodt, Han and Peter P. Wakker, 2015, “Regret Theory: A Bold Alternative to the Alternatives”, Economic Journal, 125(583): 493–532. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12200 (Scholar)
- Broome, John, 1991, Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty, and Time, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Buchak, Lara, 2013, Risk and Rationality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672165.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Camerer, Colin F., 1989, “An Experimental Test of Several Generalized Utility Theories”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2(1): 61–104. doi:10.1007/bf00055711 (Scholar)
- –––, 1995, “Individual Decision Making”, in John H. Kagel and Alvin E. Roth (ed.), Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 587–703. (Scholar)
- Camerer, Colin F. and Teck-Hua Ho, 1994, “Violations of the Betweenness Axiom and Nonlinearity in Probability”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8(2): 167–96. doi:10.1007/bf01065371 (Scholar)
- Camerer, Colin and Martin Weber, 1992, “Recent Developments in Modeling Preferences: Uncertainty and Ambiguity”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4): 325–370. doi:10.1007/bf00122575 (Scholar)
- Chew Soo Hong, 1983, “A Generalization of the Quasilinear Mean with Applications to the Measurement of Income Inequality and Decision Theory Resolving the Allais Paradox”, Econometrica, 51(4): 1065–1092. doi:10.2307/1912052 (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, “Axiomatic Utility Theories with the Betweenness Property”, Annals of Operations Research, 19(1): 273–298. doi:10.1007/bf02283525 (Scholar)
- Chew Soo Hong, L.G. Epstein and U. Segal, 1991, “Mixture Symmetry and Quadratic Utility”, Econometrica, 59(1): 139–163. doi:10.2307/2938244 (Scholar)
- Chew Soo Hong, and K. MacCrimmon, 1979, “Alpha-Nu Choice Theory: A Generalization of Expected Utility Theory”, Working Paper 669, University of British Columbia. (Scholar)
- Chew Soo Hong and Peter Wakker, 1996, “The Comonotonic Sure-Thing Principle”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 12(1): 5–27. doi:10.1007/bf00353328 (Scholar)
- Cohen, L. Jonathan, 1981, “Can Human Irrationality be Experimentally Demonstrated?”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4(3): 317–370. doi:10.1017/s0140525x00009092 (Scholar)
- de Finetti, Bruno, 1937, “La Prévision: Ses Lois Logiques, ses Sources Subjectives”, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré, 7: 1–68. (Scholar)
- Ellsberg, Daniel, 1961, “Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4): 643–669. doi:10.2307/1884324 (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, Risk, Ambiguity, and Decision, New York & London: Garland. (Scholar)
- Etner, Johanna, Megleria Jeleva, and Jean-Marc Tallon, 2012, “Decision Theory under Ambiguity”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(2): 234–270. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00641.x (Scholar)
- Fishburn, Peter C., 1970, Utility Theory for Decision Making, (Publications in Operations Research, No. 18), New York: John Wiley and Sons. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, “Non-Transitive Measurable Utility for Decision under Uncertainty”, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18(2): 187–207. doi:10.1016/0304-4068(89)90021-9 (Scholar)
- Friedman, Milton and L.J. Savage, 1952, “The Expected-Utility Hypothesis and the Measurability of Utility”, Journal of Political Economy, 60(6): 463–474. doi:10.1086/257308 (Scholar)
- Galaabaatar, Tsogbadral and Edi Karni, 2013, “Subjective Expected Utility with Incomplete Preferences”, Econometrica, 81(1): 255–284. doi:10.3982/ecta9621 (Scholar)
- Ghirardato, Paolo, Fabio Maccheroni, Massimo Marinacci, and Marciano Siniscalchi, 2003, “A Subjective Spin on Roulette Wheels”, Econometrica, 71(6): 1897–1908. doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00472 (Scholar)
- Gilboa, Itzhak, 1987, “Expected Utility with Purely Subjective Non-Additive Probabilities”, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 16(1): 65–88. doi:10.1016/0304-4068(87)90022-x (Scholar)
- Gilboa, Itzhak and Massimo Marinacci, 2013, “Ambiguity and the Bayesian Paradigm”, in D. Acemoglu, M. Arellano, and E. Dekel (ed.), Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, (Tenth World Congress of the Econometric Society), New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Gilboa, Itzhak and David Schmeidler, 1989, “Maxmin Expected Utility with a Non-Unique Prior”, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18(2): 141–153. doi:10.1016/0304-4068(89)90018-9 (Scholar)
- Goodman, Nelson, 1965, Fact, Fiction and Forecast, second edition, Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. (Scholar)
- Grant, Simon, 1995, “Subjective Probability without Monotonicity: Or How Machina’s Mom May also Be Probabilistically Sophisticated”, Econometrica, 63(1): 159 189. doi:10.2307/2951701 (Scholar)
- Green, Jerry R. and Bruno Jullien, 1988, “Ordinal Independence in Nonlinear Utility Theory”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(4): 355–387. doi:10.1007/bf00117641 (Scholar)
- Guala, Francesco, 2000, “The Logic of Normative Falsification: Rationality and Experiments in Decision Theory”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 7(1): 59–93. doi:10.1080/135017800362248 (Scholar)
- Gul, Faruk, 1991, “A Theory of Disappointment Aversion”, Econometrica, 59(3): 667–686. doi:10.2307/2938223 (Scholar)
- Hales, Steven D., 2006, Relativism and the Foundations of Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Handa, Jagdish, 1977, “Risk, Probabilities and a New Theory of Cardinal Utility”, Journal of Political Economy, 85(1): 97–122. doi:10.1086/260547 (Scholar)
- Harless, David W. and Colin F. Camerer, 1994, “The Predictive Utility of Generalized Expected Utility Theories”, Econometrica, 62(6): 1251–1289. doi:10.2307/2951749 (Scholar)
- Heukelom, Floris, 2014, Behavioral Economics: A History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139600224 (Scholar)
- Hey, John Denis, 2014, “Choice Under Uncertainty: Empirical Methods and Experimental Results”, in Machina & Viscusi 2014: 809–850. (Scholar)
- Hurwicz, Leonid, 1951, “Some Specification Problems and Applications to Econometric Models”, Econometrica, 19(3): 343–344. (Scholar)
- Jallais, Sophie and Pierre-Charles Pradier, 2005, “The Allais Paradox and its Immediate Consequences for Expected Utility Theory”, in Philippe Fontaine and Robert Leonard (ed.) The Experiment in the History of Economics, London: Routledge, pp. 25–49. (Scholar)
- Jallais, Sophie, Pierre-Charles Pradier, and David Teira, 2008, “Facts, Norms and Expected Utility Functions”, History of the Human Sciences, 21(2): 45–62. doi:10.1177/0952695108091414 (Scholar)
- Joyce, James M., 1999, The Foundations of Causal Decision Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511498497 (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, “How Probabilities Reflect Evidence”, Philosophical Perspectives, 19(1): 153–178. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2005.00058.x (Scholar)
- Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky, 1979, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk”, Econometrica, 47(2): 263–291. doi:10.2307/1914185 (Scholar)
- Keynes, John Maynard, 1921, A Treatise on Probability, London: Macmillan. (Scholar)
- Klibanoff, Peter, Massimo Marinacci, and Sujoy Mukerji, 2005, “A Smooth Model of Decision Making Under Ambiguity”, Econometrica, 73(6): 1849–1892. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00640.x (Scholar)
- Kreps, David M., 1988, Notes on the Theory of Choice, Boulder, CO: Westview Press. (Scholar)
- List, Christian and Philip Pettit, 2011, Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591565.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Loomes, Graham and Robert Sugden, 1982, “Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty”, Economic Journal, 92(386): 805–824. doi:10.2307/2232669 (Scholar)
- –––, 1987, “Some implications of a More General Form of Regret Theory”, Journal of Economic Theory, 41(2): 270–287. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(87)90020-2 (Scholar)
- Luce, R. Duncan and Howard Raiffa, 1957, Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey, New York: Wiley. (Scholar)
- Machina, Mark J., 1987, “Choice under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1(1): 121–154. doi:10.1257/jep.1.1.121 (Scholar)
- Machina, Mark J. and David Schmeidler, 1992, “A more Robust Definition of Subjective Probability”, Econometrica, 60(4): 745–780. doi:10.2307/2951565 (Scholar)
- Machina, Mark J., and Marciano Siniscalchi, 2014, “Ambiguity and Ambiguity Aversion”, in Machina & Viscus 2014i 2014: 729–807. (Scholar)
- Machina, Mark J. and Kip Viscusi (ed.), 2014, Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty, Volume 1, Amsterdam: Elsevier. (Scholar)
- MacCrimmon, Kenneth R., 1968, “Descriptive and Normative Implications of the Decision-Theory Postulates”, in K. Borch and J. Mossin (ed.), Risk and Uncertainty, New York: St. Martins Press, pp. 3–32. (Scholar)
- MacCrimmon, Kenneth R. and Stig Larsson, 1979, “Utility Theory: Axioms versus ‘Paradoxes’”, in Allais & Hagen 1979: 333–409. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7629-1_15 (Scholar)
- Maher, Patrick, 1993, Betting on Theories, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Marschak, Jacob, 1951, “Why ‘Should’ Statisticians and Businessmen Maximize ‘Moral Expectation’”, Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 493–506. (Scholar)
- May, Kenneth O., 1954, “Intransitivity, Utility, and the Aggregation of Preference Patterns”, Econometrica, 22(1): 1–13. doi:10.2307/1909827 (Scholar)
- McClennen, Edward F., 2009, “The Normative Status of the Independence Principle”, in Anand, Pattanaik, & Puppe 2009: 140–155. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290420.003.0006 (Scholar)
- Mongin, Philippe, 2009, “Duhemian Themes in Expected Utility Theory”, Anastasios Brenner & Jean Gayon (eds), French Studies In The Philosophy Of Science, (Boston Studies In The Philosophy Of Science, 276), Springer, pp. 303–357. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9368-5_13 (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, “Le Paradoxe d’Allais. Comment Lui Rendre sa Signification Perdue?”, Revue Économique, 65(5): 743–779. (Scholar)
- Morgenstern, Oskar, 1979, “Some Reflections on Utility”, in Allais & Hagen 1979: 175–184. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7629-1_6 (Scholar)
- Nau, Robert, 2006, “The Shape of Incomplete Preferences”, Annals of Statistics, 34: 2430–2448. doi:10.1214/009053606000000740 (Scholar)
- Ok, Efe A., Pietro Ortoleva, and Gil Riella, 2012, “Incomplete Preferences under Uncertainty: Indecisiveness in Beliefs versus Tastes”, Econometrica, 80(4): 1791–1808. doi:10.3982/ecta8040 (Scholar)
- Quiggin, John, 1982, “A Theory of Anticipated Utility”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4): 323–343. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(82)90008-7 (Scholar)
- –––, 1992, Generalized Expected Utility Theory: The Rank Dependent Model, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Ramsey, Frank P., 1931, “Truth and Probability”, in R.B. Braithwaite (ed.) The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays, New York: Harcourt and Brace, pp. 156–198. (Scholar)
- Regenwetter, Michel, Jason Dana, and Clinton P. Davis-Stober, 2011, “Transitivity of Preferences”, Psychological Review, 118(1): 42–56. doi:10.1037/a0021150 (Scholar)
- Savage, Leonard J., 1954, The Foundations of Statistics, New York: Wiley, Second Edition. (Scholar)
- Schmeidler, David, 1986, “Integral Representation without Additivity”, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 97(2): 255–261. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, “Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity”, Econometrica, 57(3): 571–587. doi:10.2307/1911053 (Scholar)
- Seidenfeld, Teddy, Mark J. Schervish, and Joseph B. Kadane, 1995, “A Representation of Partially Ordered Preferences”, Annals of Statistics, 23(6): 2168–2217. doi:10.1214/aos/1034713653 (Scholar)
- Slovic, Paul and Amos Tversky, 1974, “Who Accepts Savage’s Axiom?”, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 19(6): 368–373. doi:10.1002/bs.3830190603 (Scholar)
- Stanovich, Keith E., 1999, Who Is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Scholar)
- Starmer, Chris, 2000, “Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk”, Journal of Economic Literature, 38(2): 332–382. doi:10.1257/jel.38.2.332 (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, “Normative Notions in Descriptive Dialogues”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 12(2): 277–289. doi:10.1080/13501780500086206 (Scholar)
- Stein, Edward, 1996, Without Good Reason: The Rationality Debate in Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Stich, Stephen P., 1990, The Fragmentation of Reason, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Sugden, Robert, 1993, “An Axiomatic Foundation For Regret Theory”, Journal of Economic Theory, 60(1): 159–180. doi:10.1006/jeth.1993.1039 (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, “Alternatives to Expected Utility: Foundations”, in Salvador Barberà, Peter J. Hammond, and Christian Seidl (ed.), Handbook of Utility Theory: Volume 2 Extensions, Boston, MA: Springer, pp. 685–755. (Scholar)
- Sytsma, Justin and Jonathan Livengood, 2014, The Theory and Practice of Experimental Philosophy, Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press. (Scholar)
- Talbot, Brian, 2014, “Why so Negative? Evidence Aggregation and Armchair Philosophy”, Synthèse, 191(16): 3865–3896. doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0509-z (Scholar)
- Thagard, Paul, 1982, “From the Descriptive to the Normative in Psychology and Logic”, Philosophy of Science, 49(1): 24–42. doi:10.1086/289032 (Scholar)
- Trautmann, Stefan T., and Gijs van de Kuilen, 2015, “Ambiguity Attitudes”, in Gideon Keren & George Wu (ed.), The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, Oxford: Blackwell, 89–116. (Scholar)
- Tversky, Amos, 1969, “Intransitivity of Preferences”, Psychological Review, 76(1): 31–48. doi:10.1037/h0026750 (Scholar)
- Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman, 1986, “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions”, The Journal of Business, 59(4): 251–278. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992, “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4): 297–323. doi:10.1007/bf00122574 (Scholar)
- van de Kuilen, Gijs and Peter P. Wakker, 2006, “Learning in the Allais Paradox”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 33(3): 155–164. doi:10.1007/s11166-006-0390-3 (Scholar)
- van Fraassen, Bas C., 1989, Laws and Symmetry, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0198248601.001.0001 (Scholar)
- von Neumann, John and Oskar Morgenstern, 1947, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, second edition, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Wald, Abraham, 1950, Statistical Decision Functions. New York: John Wiley and Sons. (Scholar)
- Wakker, Peter P., 1989, “Continuous Subjective Expected Utility with Nonadditive Probabilities”, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18(1): 1–27. doi:10.1016/0304-4068(89)90002-5 (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Wakker, Peter P. and Amos Tversky, 1993, “An Axiomatization of Cumulative Prospect Theory”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7(2): 147–175. doi:10.1007/bf01065812 (Scholar)
- Weber, Michael, 1998, “The Resilience of the Allais Paradox”, Ethics, 109(1): 94–118. doi:10.1086/233875 (Scholar)
- Weber, Michael and Colin F. Camerer, 1987, “Recent Developments in Modelling Preferences under Risk”, OR Spektrum, 9(3): 129–151. doi:10.1007/bf01721094 (Scholar)
- Weirich, Paul, 1986, “Expected Utility and Risk”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 37(4): 419–442. doi:10.1093/bjps/37.4.419 (Scholar)
- Zappia, Carlo, 2016, “Daniel Ellsberg and the Validation of Normative Propositions”, Oeconomia, 6(1): 57–79. doi:10.4000/oeconomia.2276 (Scholar)
