Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Depiction" by John Hyman and Katerina Bantinaki
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Abell, Catharine, 2005, “On Outlining the Shape of Depiction”, Ratio, 18(1): 27–38. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9329.2005.00268.x (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, “Realism and the Riddle of Style”, Contemporary Aesthetics, 4: 376. [Abell 2006 available online] (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, “Pictorial Realism”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 85(1): 1–17. doi:10.1080/00048400601185529 (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Canny Resemblance”, Philosophical Review, 118(2): 183–223. doi:10.1215/00318108-2008-041 (Scholar)
- Abell, Catharine and Katerina Bantinaki (eds.), 2010, Philosophical Perspectives on Depiction, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:">10.1093/acprof:">10.1093/acprof:">10.1093/acprof:">10.1093/acprof:">10.1093/acprof:">10.1093/acprof:">10.1093/acprof:">10.1093/acprof:">10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199585960.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Ackerman, James S., 1978, “On Rereading ‘Style’”, Social Research, 45(1): 153–163. (Scholar)
- Aristotle, Poetics, Stephen Halliwell (trans.), London: Duckworth, 1987.
- Arrell, Douglas, 1987, “What Goodman Should Have Said About Representation”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 46(1): 41–9. doi:10.2307/431307 (Scholar)
- Bach, Kent, 1970, “Part of What a Picture Is”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 10(2): 119–137. doi:10.1093/bjaesthetics/10.2.119 (Scholar)
- Bantinaki, Katerina, 2007, “Pictorial Perception as Illusion”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 47(3): 268–279. doi:10.1093/aesthj/aym007 (Scholar)
- Blumson, Ben, 2009, “Defining Depiction”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 49(2): 143–57. doi:10.1093/aesthj/ayp003 (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “Depictive Structure?” Philosophical Papers, 40(1): 1–25. doi:10.1080/05568641.2011.560026 (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, Resemblance and Representation, Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. doi:10.11647/obp.0046 (Scholar)
- Bois, Yve-Alain, 1987, “Kahnweiler’s Lesson”, Representations, 18: 33–68. doi:10.2307/3043750 (Scholar)
- Bradley, Helen, 2014, “Reducing the Space of Seeing-In”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 54(4): 409–24. doi:10.1093/aesthj/ayu013 (Scholar)
- Brough, John, 2012, “Something That is Nothing but Can be Anything: the Image and Our Consciousness of It”, in Dan Zahavi (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Phenomenology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 545–563. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199594900.013.0027 (Scholar)
- Brown, John H., 2010, “Seeing Things in Pictures”, in Abell and Bantinaki 2010: 208–236. doi:10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199585960.003.0009 (Scholar)
- Budd, Malcolm, 2008a, “On Looking at a Picture”, in Budd 2008c: 185–215. doi:10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199556175.003.0011 (Scholar)
- –––, 2008b, “The Look of a Picture”, in Budd 2008c: 216–238. doi:10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199556175.003.0012 (Scholar)
- –––, 2008c, Aesthetic Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199556175.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Caldarola, Elisa, 2012, “Representation Without Background?”, Aisthesis. Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico, 5(2): 145–157. doi:10.13128/aisthesis-11466 (Scholar)
- Cavedon-Taylor, Dan, 2011, “The Space of Seeing-In”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 51(3): 271–278. doi:10.1093/aesthj/ayr020 (Scholar)
- Chasid, Alon, 2007, “Content-Free Pictorial Realism”, Philosophical Studies, 135: 375–405. doi:10.1007/s11098-005-3256-7 (Scholar)
- Curry, Gregory, 1995, Image and Mind: Film, Philosophy and Cognitive Science, New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511551277 (Scholar)
- Descartes, René, [1637] 1985, “Optics”, in Philosophical Writings, translated by John Cottingham et al., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, volume 1, pp. 152–176. (Scholar)
- Dilworth, John, 2005, “A Double Content Theory of Artistic Representation”, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 63(3): 249–260. doi:10.1111/j.0021-8529.2005.00205.x [Dilworth 2005 available online] (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “Depictive Seeing and Double Content”, in Abell and Bantinaki 2010: 104–127. doi:10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199585960.003.0005 (Scholar)
- Evans, Gareth, 1982, The Varieties of Reference, edited by John McDowell, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Geach, P.T., 1972, Logic Matters, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Gombrich, E.H., 1960, Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, London: Phaidon. (Scholar)
- –––, 1963, “Meditations on a Hobby Horse”, in Meditations on a Hobby Horse and Other Essays, London: Phaidon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1968, “Style”, International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 15: 352–61. Reprinted Donald Preziosi (ed.), 1998, The Art of Art History: a Critical Anthology, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1973, “Illusion and Art”, in Gregory & Gombrich 1973: 193–244. (Scholar)
- Goodman, Nelson, 1968, Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (Scholar)
- –––, 1972, Problems and Projects, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (Scholar)
- –––, 1976, Languages of Art, second edition, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (Scholar)
- Gregory, R.L. & E.H. Gombrich, 1973, Illusion in Nature and Art, London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
- Grice, H.P., 1957, “Meaning”, Philosophical Review, 66(3): 377–88. doi:10.2307/2182440 (Scholar)
- Haugeland, John, 1981, “Analog and Analog”, Philosophical Topics, 12(1): 213–226. doi:10.5840/philtopics198112150 (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, “Representational Genera”, in William Ramsey, Stephen P. Stich, & David E. Rumelhart (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 61–90. (Scholar)
- Herwitz, Daniel, 1999, “Review of Dominic Lopes: Understanding Pictures”, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 57(3): 385–388. doi:10.2307/432213 (Scholar)
- Hopkins, Robert, 1997, “Review of Dominic Lopes: Understanding Pictures”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 37(3): 283–286. doi:10.1093/bjaesthetics/37.3.283 (Scholar)
- –––, 1998a, Picture, Image and Experience: A Philosophical Inquiry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998b, “Depiction”, in Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Volume 2), Edward Craig (ed.), London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, “What Makes Representational Painting Truly Visual?” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 77(1): 149–167. doi:10.1111/1467-8349.00107 (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, “The Speaking Image: Visual Communication and the Nature of Depiction”, in Kieran 2005: 145–159. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “Inflected Pictorial Experience: Its Treatment and Significance”, in Abell & Bantinaki 2010: 151–180. doi:10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199585960.003.0007 (Scholar)
- Hospers, John, 1947, Meaning and Truth in the Arts, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. (Scholar)
- Hyman, John, 2005, “Realism and Relativism in the Theory of Art”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 105(1): 25–53. doi:10.1111/j.0066-7373.2004.00101.x (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, The Objective Eye: Color, Form, and Reality in the Theory of Art, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, “Depicting Colours: Reply to Newall”, Philosophical Quarterly, 57(229): 674–678. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.508.x (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Realism”, in Stephen Davies, Kathleen Marie Higgins, Robert Hopkins, Robert Stecker, & David E. Cooper (eds.), A Companion to Aesthetics, second edition, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 495–498. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Depiction”, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 71: 129–150. doi:10.1017/s1358246112000276 (Scholar)
- Jagnow, René, 2019, “Twofold Pictorial Experience”, Erkenntnis. doi:10.1007/s10670-019-00135-0 (Scholar)
- Jakobson, Roman, [1921/1971] 1987, “On Realism in Art” (1921 original in Czech, English version first in Readings in Russian Poetics: Formalist and Structuralist Views, Karol Magassy (trans.), Ladislav Matejka & Krystyna Pomorska (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1971). Reprinted in Language in Literature, Krystyna Pomorska & Stephen Rudy (eds), Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, pp. 19–27. (Scholar)
- Kemp, Gary and Gabriele M. Mras (eds.), 2016, Wollheim, Wittgenstein and Pictorial Representation, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Kieran, Matthew (ed.), 2005, Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Kripke, Saul A., 1977, “Speaker’s Reference and Semantic Reference”, in Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling, Jr, and Howard K. Wettstein (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 6–27. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, Reference and Existence, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199928385.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Kulvicki, John, 2006, On Images, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Heavenly Sight and the Nature of Seeing-In”, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 67(4): 387–397. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6245.2009.01368.x (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Review of Michael Newall: What is a Picture?” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 15 March 2012. [Kulvicki 2012 available online] (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, Images, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, 2020, Modeling the Meanings of Pictures: Depiction and the Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Langer, Susanne K., 1942, Philosophy in a New Key, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Levinson, Jerrold, [1998] 2001, “Wollheim on Pictorial Representation”, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 56(3): 227–233. Reprinted in van Gerwen 2001: 28–38. doi:10.2307/432362 (Scholar)
- Lewis, David, 1971, “Analog and Digital”, Noûs, 5(3): 321–327. doi:10.2307/2214671 (Scholar)
- Lopes, Dominic, 1996, Understanding Pictures, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199272037.001.0001 (Scholar)
- –––, 2005a, Sight and Sensibility: Evaluating Pictures, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0199277346.001.0001 (Scholar)
- –––, 2005b, “The Domain of Depiction”, in Kieran 2005: 160–174. (Scholar)
- Matthen, Mohan, 2005, Seeing, Doing, and Knowing, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0199268509.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Mion, Regina-Nino, 2019, “Threefold Pictorial Experience and Aesthetic Value”, in Jérôme Pelletier & Alberto Voltolini (eds.), The Pleasure of Pictures: Pictorial Experience and Aesthetic Appreciation, New York: Routledge, pp. 107–124. (Scholar)
- Nanay, Bence, 2004, “Taking Twofoldness Seriously: Walton on Imagination and Depiction”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 62(3): 285–289. doi:10.1111/j.0021-8529.2004.0160.x (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “Inflected and Uninflected Experience of Pictures”, in Abell & Bantinaki 2010: 181–207. doi:10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199585960.003.0008 (Scholar)
- –––, 2018, “Threefoldness”, Philosophical Studies, 175: 163–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0860-2 (Scholar)
- Neander, Karen, 1987, “Pictorial Representation: a Matter of Resemblance”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 27(3): 213–226. doi:10.1093/bjaesthetics/27.3.213 (Scholar)
- Neer, Richard T., 2002, Style and Politics in Athenian Vase-Painting: The Craft of Democracy, ca. 530–460 B.C.E., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Newall, Michael, 2006, “Pictures, Colour and Resemblance”, Philosophical Quarterly, 56(225): 587–95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9213.2006.460.x (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Pictorial Experience and Seeing”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 49(2): 129–141. doi:10.1093/aesthj/ayp002 (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, What is a Picture? Depiction, Realism, Abstraction, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
- –––, 2015, “Is Seeing-In a Transparency Effect?” British Journal of Aesthetics, 55: 131–156. doi:10.1093/aesthj/ayu101 (Scholar)
- Newman, Ira, 1998, “Review of Dominic Lopes: Understanding Pictures”, Philosophical Books, 39(4): 273–275. doi:10.1111/1468-0149.00124 (Scholar)
- Nochlin, Linda, 1971, Realism, Harmondsworth: Penguin. (Scholar)
- Panofsky, Erwin, 1997, Three Essays on Style, edited by Irving Lavin, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Peacocke, Christopher, 1987, “Depiction”, Philosophical Review, 96(3): 383–410. doi:10.2307/2185226 (Scholar)
- Peirce, Charles S., 1982–, The Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, eds. M. Fisch, C. Kloesel, E. Moore, N. Houser et al., Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
- Penrose, Roland, 1973, “In Praise of Illusion”, in Gregory & Gombrich 1973: 245–284. (Scholar)
- Plato, The Republic, Robin Waterfield (trans.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
- Podro, Michael, 1991, “Depiction and the Golden Calf”, in Norman Bryson, Michael Ann Holly, & Keith Moxey Visual Theory: Painting and Interpretation, New York: Harper Collins, ch. 5. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, Depiction, New Haven and London: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “Literalism and Truthfulness in Painting”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 50(4): 457–68. doi:10.1093/aesthj/ayq037 (Scholar)
- Riegl, Alois, [1893] 1992, Problems of Style: Foundations for a History of Ornament, (Stilfragen : Grundlegungen zu einer Geschichte der Ornamentik), Evelyn Kain (trans.), Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Rundle, Bede, 1979, Grammar in Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Ruskin, John, 1857, The Elements of Drawing in Three Letters to Beginners, London: Spottiswood. Ruskin 1857 available online (Scholar)
- Russell, Bertrand, 1914, Our Knowledge of the External World, Chicago and London: The Open Court Publishing Company. (Scholar)
- Ryle, Gilbert, 1949, The Concept of Mind, New York: Barnes & Noble. (Scholar)
- Sainsbury, R.M., 2005, Reference Without Referents, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Sartwell, Crispin, 1991, “Natural Generativity and Imitation”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 31(1): 58–67. doi:10.1093/bjaesthetics/31.1.58 (Scholar)
- –––, 1994, “What Pictorial Realism Is”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 34: 2–12. doi:10.1093/bjaesthetics/34.1.2 (Scholar)
- Savile, Anthony, 1986, “Imagination and Pictorial Understanding”, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 60(1): 19–60. doi:10.1093/aristoteliansupp/60.1.19 (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, “Review of Dominic Lopes: Understanding Pictures”, Mind, 109(433): 158–162. doi:10.1093/mind/109.433.129 (Scholar)
- Schapiro, Meyer, 1978, Modern Art: 19th and 20th Centuries, New York: George Braziller. (Scholar)
- –––, 1994, Theory and Philosophy of Art: Style, Artist and Society, New York: George Braziller. (Scholar)
- Schier, Flint, 1986, Deeper Into Pictures, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511735585 (Scholar)
- Squires, Roger, 1969, “Depicting”, Philosophy, 44(169): 193–204. doi:10.1017/s0031819100024566 (Scholar)
- Steinberg, Leo, [1953] 1972, “The Eye is Part of the Mind”, reprinted in Other Criteria: Confrontations with Twentieth Century Art, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972. (Scholar)
- Stewart, Andrew, 1997, Art, Desire and the Body in Ancient Greece, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Stock, Kathleen, 2008, “The Role of Imagining in Seeing-In”,, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 66(4): 365–380. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6245.2008.00317.x (Scholar)
- Strawson, P.F., 1976, Subject and Predicate in Logic and Grammar, Oxford: Basil Blackwell (Scholar)
- Terrone, Enrico, forthcoming, “The Standard of Correctness and the Ontology of Depiction”, American Philosophical Quarterly. (Scholar)
- van Gerwen, Rob (ed.), 2001, Richard Wollheim on the Art of Painting: Art as Representation and Expression, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Voltolini, Alberto, 2013, “Why, as Responsible for Figurativity, Seeing-In Can Only be Inflected Seeing-In”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(3): 651–67. doi:10.1007/s11097-013-9335-x (Scholar)
- –––, 2015, A Syncretistic Theory of Depiction, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
- –––, 2018, “Twofoldness and Three-Layeredness in Pictorial Representation”, Estetika, 55(1): 81–111. doi:10.33134/eeja.172 (Scholar)
- Walton, Kendall L., 1984, “Transparent Pictures: On the Nature of Photographic Realism”, Critical Inquiry, 11(2): 246–77. doi:10.1086/448287 (Scholar)
- –––, 1990, Mimesis as Make-Believe, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008a, “Pictures and Hobby-Horses: Make-Believe Beyond Childhood”, in Walton 2008d: 63–78. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008b, “Seeing-In and Seeing Fictionally”, in Walton 2008d: 133–142. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008c, “Depiction, Perception and Imagination: Responses to Richard Wollheim”, in Walton 2008d: 143–156. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008d, Marvelous Images: On Values and the Arts, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “Pictures, Titles, Depictive Content”, Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society (New Series), 16: 395–408. [Walton 2011 available online] (Scholar)
- White, Alan R., 1990, The Language of Imagination, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1953, Philosophical Investigations, trans. G.E.M. Anscombe, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
- –––, 1958, Blue and Brown Books, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Wolfflin, H., 1950, Principles of Art History, trans. M.D. Hottinger, Mineola NY: Dover. (Scholar)
- Wollheim, Richard, 1963, “Art and Illusion”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 3(1): 15–37. doi:10.1093/bjaesthetics/3.1.15 (Scholar)
- –––, 1974, “Reflections on Art and Illusion”, in On Art and the Mind, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1980, “Seeing-As, Seeing-In and Pictorial Representation”, in Art and its Objects, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1987, Painting as an Art, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, “On Pictorial Representation”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 56(3): 217–226. doi:10.2307/432361 (Scholar)
- –––, 2003a, “In Defense of Seeing-In”, in Heiko Hecht, Robert Schwartz & Margaret Atherton (eds.), Looking Into Pictures: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Pictorial Space , Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003b, “What Makes Representational Painting Truly Visual?” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 77(1): 131–147. doi:10.1111/1467-8349.00106 (Scholar)
