Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Dispositions" by Sungho Choi and Michael Fara
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Armstrong, D.M., 1968, A Materialist Theory of the Mind, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, 1973, Belief, Truth and Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1983, What Is a Law of Nature?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, A Combinatorial Theory of Possibility, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, A World of States of Affairs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, ‘Four Disputes about Properties’, Synthese, 144: 309–320. (Scholar)
- Armstrong, D.M., Martin, C.B. & Place, U.T., 1996, Dispositions: A Debate, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Ashwell, L., 2010, ‘Superficial Dispositionalism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 88: 635–653. (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, ‘The Metaphysics of Desire and Dispositions’, Philosophy Compass, 9: 469–477. (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, ‘Conflicts of Desires: Dispositions and the Metaphysics of Mind’, in J. Jacobs (ed.), Causal Powers, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 167–176. (Scholar)
- Barker, S., 2013, ‘The Emperor’s New Metaphysics of
Powers’, Mind, 122: 605–653. (Scholar)
- Bird, A., 1998, ‘Dispositions and Antidotes’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 48: 227–234. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, ‘Structural Properties’, in H. Lillehammer & G. Rodriguez-Pereyra (eds.), Real Metaphysics: Essays in Honour of D.H. Mellor, London: Routledge, 154–168. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005a, ‘The Dispositionalist Conception of Laws’, Foundations of Science, 10: 353–370. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005b, ‘Laws and Essences’, Ratio, 18: 437–461. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007a, Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws
and Properties, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007b, ‘The Regress of Pure Powers?’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 57: 513–534. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, ‘Structural Properties Revisited’, in T. Handfield (ed.), Dispositions and Cause, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 215–241. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, ‘Dispositional
Expressions’, in G. Russell & D. G. Fara
(eds.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of
Language, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, ‘Overpowering: How the Powers Ontology Has Overreached Itself’, Mind, 125: 341–383. (Scholar)
- –––, manuscript, ‘Can Dispositions Have
Intrinsic Finks and Antidotes?’. (Scholar)
- Black, R., 2000, ‘Against Quidditism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 78: 87–104. (Scholar)
- Blackburn, S., 1990, ‘Filling in Space’, Analysis, 50: 62–65. (Scholar)
- Block, N., 1990, ‘Can the Mind Change the World?’, in G. S. Boolos (ed.), Meaning and Method: Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam, New York: Cambridge University Press, 137–170. (Scholar)
- Bonevac, D., Dever, J. & Sosa, D., 2011, ‘The Counterexample Fallacy’, Mind, 120: 1143–1158. (Scholar)
- Burks, A., 1951, ‘The Logic of Causal Propositions’, Mind, 60: 363–382. (Scholar)
- –––, 1955, ‘Dispositional Statements’, Philosophy of Science, 22: 175–193. (Scholar)
- Campbell, K., 1976, Metaphysics: An Introduction, Encino: Dickenson. (Scholar)
- Carnap, R., 1928, The Logical Structure of the
World, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1936–7, ‘Testability and Meaning’, Philosophy of Science, 3: 419–471 and 4: 1–40. (Scholar)
- Carruth, A., 2016, ‘Powerful Qualities, Zombies and Inconceivability’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 66: 25–46. (Scholar)
- Cartwright, N., 1999, The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Chakravartty, A., 2007, A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Chalmers, A., 1999, ‘Making Sense of Laws Physics’, in H. Sankey (ed.), Causation and Laws of Nature, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 3–16. (Scholar)
- Cheng, K.Y., 2010, ‘Intrinsic Finks and Attributions of Rule-Following Dispositions’, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 80: 209–220. (Scholar)
- Choi, S., 2003, ‘Improving Bird’s
Antidotes’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 81:
573–580. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005a, ‘Dispositions and Mimickers’, Philosophical Studies, 122: 183–188. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005b, ‘Do Categorical Ascriptions Entail Counterfactual Conditionals?’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 55: 495–503. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, ‘The Simple vs. Reformed Conditional Analysis of Dispositions’, Synthese, 148: 369–379. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, ‘Dispositional Properties and Counterfactual Conditionals’, Mind, 117: 795–841. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, ‘The Conditional Analysis of Dispositions and the Intrinsic Dispositions Thesis’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 78: 563–590. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011a, ‘Finkish Dispositions and Contextualism’, The Monist, 94: 103–120. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011b, ‘What Is a Dispositional Masker?’, Mind, 120: 1159–1171. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, ‘Intrinsic Finks and Dispositional/Categorical Distinction’, Noûs, 46: 289–325. (Scholar)
- –––, 2017a, ‘Intrinsic Interferers and the Epistemology of Dispositions’, Erkenntnis, 82: 199–232. (Scholar)
- –––, 2017b, ‘Against Intrinsic Interferers: A Critique of Kittle’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 67: 845–854. (Scholar)
- Clarke, R., 2008, ‘Intrinsic Finks’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 58: 512–518. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, ‘Opposing Powers’, Philosophical Studies, 149: 153–160. (Scholar)
- Cohen, D. & Handfield, T., 2007, ‘Finking Frankfurt’, Philosophical Studies, 135: 363–374. (Scholar)
- Contessa, G., 2012, ‘Do Extrinsic Dispositions Need Extrinsic Causal Bases?’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 84: 622–638. (Scholar)
- Corry, R., 2011, ‘Can Dispositional Essences Ground the Laws of Nature?’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 89: 263–275. (Scholar)
- Cross, T., 2005, ‘What Is a Disposition?’, Synthese, 144: 321–341. (Scholar)
- Dretske, F., 1977, ‘Laws of Nature’, Philosophy of Science, 44: 248–268. (Scholar)
- Earman, J., 1984, ‘Laws of Nature: The Empiricist
Challenge’, in R. Bogdan (ed.), M. Armstrong,
Dordrecht: Reidel, 191–223. (Scholar)
- Ellis, B., 1999, ‘Causal Powers and the Laws of Nature’, in H. Sankey (ed.), Causation and Laws of Nature, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 19–34. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, Scientific Essentialism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, The Philosophy of Nature: A Guide to the New Essentialism, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, ‘Causal Powers and Categorical Properties’, in A. Marmodoro (ed.), The Metaphysics of Powers: Their Grounding and Their Manifestations, London: Routledge, 133–142. (Scholar)
- Ellis, B. & Lierse, C., 1994, ‘Dispositional Essentialism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72: 27–45. (Scholar)
- Engelhard, K., 2010, ‘Categories and the Ontology of Powers: A Vindication of the Identity Theory of Properties’, In A. Marmadoro (ed.), The Metaphysics of Powers: Their Grounding and Their Manifestations, New York: Routledge, 41–57. (Scholar)
- Everett, A., 2009, ‘Intrinsic Finks, Masks, and Mimics’, Erkenntnis, 71: 191–203. (Scholar)
- Fara, M., 2005, ‘Dispositions and Habituals’, Noûs, 39: 43–82. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, ‘Masked Abilities and Compatibilism’, Mind, 117: 843–865. (Scholar)
- Fine, K., 2002, ‘The Varieties of Necessity’, in T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 253–281. (Scholar)
- Foster, J., 1982, The Case for Idealism, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Goodman, N., 1954, Fact, Fiction and Forecast, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Gundersen, E., 2017, ‘Lewis’s Revised Conditional
Analysis Revisited’, Synthese, 194:
4541–4558. (Scholar)
- Gundersen, L., 2002, ‘In Defence of the Conditional Account of Dispositions’, Synthese, 130: 389–411. (Scholar)
- Hajek, A., forthcoming, ‘Minkish Dispositions’, Synthese, first online 22 February 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11229-015-1011-y (Scholar)
- Handfield, T., 2005, ‘Armstrong and the Modal Inversion of Dispositions’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 55: 452–461. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008a, ‘Humean Dispositionalism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 86: 113–126. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008b, ‘Unfinkable Dispositions’, Synthese, 160: 297–308. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, ‘The Metaphysics of Dispositions and Causes’, in T. Handfield (ed.), Dispositions and Causes, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–31. (Scholar)
- Handfield, T. & Bird, A., 2008, ‘Dispositions, Rules, and Finks’, Philosophical Studies, 140: 285–98. (Scholar)
- Harré, R., 1970, ‘Powers’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 21: 81–101. (Scholar)
- Harré, R. & Madden, E.H., 1975, Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Hauska, J., 2008a, ‘In Defence of Causal Bases’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 86: 23–43. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008b, ‘Dispositions and Normal Conditions’, Philosophical Studies, 139: 219–232. (Scholar)
- Hawthorne, J., 2002, ‘Advice for
Physicalists’, Philosophical Studies, 109:
53–74. (Scholar)
- Heil, J., 2003, From an Ontological Point of View, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, ‘Dispositions’, Synthese, 144: 343–356. (Scholar)
- Hildebrand, T., 2014, ‘Can Bare Dispositions Explain Categorical Regularities?’, Philosophical Studies, 167: 569–584. (Scholar)
- Ingthorsson, R.D., 2012, ‘The Regress of Pure Power Revisited’, European Journal of Philosophy, 23: 529–541. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, ‘Properties: Qualities, Powers, or Both?’, Dialectica, 67: 55–80. (Scholar)
- Jackson, F., 1995, ‘Essentialism, Mental Properties and Causation’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 95: 253–268. (Scholar)
- –––, 1996, ‘Mental Causation’, Mind, 105: 377–415. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Jacobs, J.D., 2010, ‘A Powers Theory of Modality – or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Reject Possible Worlds’, Philosophical Studies, 151: 227–248. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, ‘Powerful Qualities, Not Pure Powerful’, The Monist, 94: 81–102. (Scholar)
- Johnston, M., 1992, ‘How to Speak of the Colors’, Philosophical Studies, 68: 221–263. (Scholar)
- Kaila, E., 1939, Inhimillinen tieto, Helsinki:
Otava. (Scholar)
- –––, 1942, ‘Über den physikalischen Realitatsbegriff’, Acta Philosophia Fennica, 4: 33–34. (Scholar)
- Kim, J., 1990, ‘Explanatory Exclusion and the Problem of Mental Causation’, in E. Villanueva (ed.), Information, Semantics, and Epistemology, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 36–56. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, Mind in a Physical World, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Kistler, M., 2002, ‘The Causal Criterion of Reality and the Necessity of Laws of Nature’, Metaphysica, 3: 57–86. (Scholar)
- Kittle, S., 2015, ‘Powers Opposed and Intrinsic Finks’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 65: 372–380. (Scholar)
- Kripke, S., 1972, ‘Naming and Necessity’, in D. Davidson & G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Dordrecht: Reidel, 253–355. (Scholar)
- Kroll, N., 2017, ‘Teleological Dispositions’, In K. Bennett & D.W. Zimmerman (eds.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, vol. 10, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–37. (Scholar)
- Langton, R., 1998, Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, ‘Elusive Knowledge of Things in Themselves’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 82: 129–136. (Scholar)
- Langton, R. & Lewis, D., 1998, ‘Defining
“Intrinsic”’, Philosophy and Phenomenological
Research, 58: 333–345. (Scholar)
- Lewis, D., 1973, Counterfactuals, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1986, On the Plurality of Worlds, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, ‘Finkish Dispositions’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 47: 143–158. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, ‘Ramseyan Humility’, in D. B. Mitchell & R. Nola (eds.), Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 203–222. (Scholar)
- Lowe, E.J., 2010, ‘On the Individuation of Powers’, in A. Marmodoro (ed.), The Metaphysics of Powers: Their Grounding and Their Manifestations, New York: Routledge, 8–26. (Scholar)
- Mackie, J.L., 1973, Truth, Probability and Paradox, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1977, ‘Dispositions, Grounds and Causes’, Synthese, 34: 361–370. (Scholar)
- Malzkorn, W., 2000, ‘Realism, Functionalism and the Conditional Analysis of Dispositions’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 50: 452–469. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, ‘Defining Disposition Concepts: A Brief History of the Problem’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 32: 335–353. (Scholar)
- Manley, D. & Wasserman, R., 2007, ‘A Gradable Approach to Dispositions’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 57: 68–75. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, ‘On Linking Dispositions and Conditionals’, Mind, 117: 59–84. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, ‘Dispositions, Conditionals, and Counterexamples’, Mind, 120: 1191–1227. (Scholar)
- Marmodoro, A., 2009, ‘Do Powers Need Powers to Make Them Powerful?: From Pandispositionalism to Aristotle’, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 26: 337–352. (Scholar)
- Martin, C.B., 1994, ‘Dispositions and Conditionals’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 44: 1–8. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, ‘On the Need for Properties: The Road to Pythagoreanism and Back’, Synthese, 112: 193–231. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, The Mind in Nature, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Martin, C.B. & Heil, J., 1998, ‘Rules and Powers’, Philosophical Perspectives, 12: 238–312. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, ‘The Ontological Turn’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 23: 34–60. (Scholar)
- McKitrick, J., 2003a, ‘A Case for Extrinsic Dispositions’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 81: 155–174. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003b, ‘The Bare Metaphysical Possibility of Bare Dispositions’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 66: 349–369. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, ‘A Defence of the Causal Efficacy of Dispositions’, Sats: Nordic Journal of Philosophy, 5: 110–130. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, ‘Are Dispositions Causally Relevant?’, Synthese, 144: 357–371. (Scholar)
- Mellor, D.H., 1974, ‘In Defence of Dispositions’, The Philosophical Review, 83: 157–181. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, ‘The Semantics and Ontology of Dispositions’, Mind, 109: 757–780. (Scholar)
- Menzies, P., 2009, ‘Critical Notices of Nature’s
Metaphysics, by Alexander
Bird’, Analysis, 69: 769–778. (Scholar)
- Molnar, G., 1999, ‘Are Dispositions Reducible?’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 49: 1–17. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, Powers: A Study in Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Mumford, S., 1998, Dispositions, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, ‘Realism and the Conditional Analysis of Dispositions: Reply to Malzkorn’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 51: 375–378. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, Laws in Nature, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, ‘The Ungrounded Argument’, Synthese, 149: 471–489. (Scholar)
- Ney, A., 2007, ‘Physicalism and Our Knowledge of Intrinsic Properties’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 85: 41–60. (Scholar)
- Nolan, D., 2015, ‘Noncausal Dispositions’, Noûs, 49: 425–439. (Scholar)
- Pap, A., 1958. ‘Disposition Concepts and Extensional
Logic’, in H. Feigl, M. Scriven, & G. Maxwell
(eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science,
vol. 2, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,
196–224. (Scholar)
- Popper, K., 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson & Co. (Scholar)
- Prior, E., 1982, ‘The Dispositional/Categorical Distinction’, Analysis, 42: 93–96. (Scholar)
- –––, 1985, Dispositions, Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press. (Scholar)
- Prior, E., Pargetter, R. & Jackson, F., 1982, ‘Three Theses about Dispositions’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 19: 251–257. (Scholar)
- Psillos, S., 2006, ‘What Do Powers Do When They Are Not Manifested?’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 72: 137–156. (Scholar)
- Quine, W.V., 1960, Word and Object, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Ramsey, F., 1978, Foundations: Essays in Philosophy, Logic, Mathematics and Economic, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
- Rives, B., 2005, ‘Why Dispositions Are (Still) Distinct from Their Bases and Causally Impotent’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 42: 19–31. (Scholar)
- Robinson, D., 1993, ‘Epiphenomenalism, Laws & Properties’, Philosophical Studies, 69: 1–34. (Scholar)
- Robinson, H., 1982, Matter and Sense, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Ryle, G., 1949, The Concept of Mind, London: Penguin. (Scholar)
- Schaffer, J., 2003, ‘Overdetermining Causes’, Philosophical Studies, 114: 23–45. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, ‘Quiddistic Knowledge’, Philosophical Studies, 123: 1–32. (Scholar)
- Schlosser, M.E., 2011, ‘The Metaphysics of Rule-Following’, Philosophical Studies, 155: 345–369. (Scholar)
- –––, 2018, ‘Lewis’ Conditional
Analysis of Dispositions Revisited and Revised’, Acta
Analytica, 33: 241–253.
- Sellars, W., 1958, ‘Counterfactuals, Dispositions and the
Causal Modalities’, in H. Feigl, M. Scriven, & G. Maxwell
(eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science,
vol.2, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 225–308. (Scholar)
- Shoemaker, S., 1980, ‘Causality and Properties’, in P. van Inwagen (ed.), Time and Cause: Essays Presented to Richard Taylor, Dordrecht: Reidel, 109–135. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, ‘Causal and Metaphysical Necessity’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 79: 59–77. (Scholar)
- Shope, R.K., 1978, ‘The Conditional Fallacy in Contemporary Philosophy’, Journal of Philosophy, 75: 397–413. (Scholar)
- Simpson, W., 2017, ‘Half-baked Humeanism’, in W. Simpson, R. Koons & N. Teh (eds.), Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science, New York: Routledge, 123–146. (Scholar)
- Smith, A.D., 1977, ‘Dispositional Properties’, Mind, 86: 439–445. (Scholar)
- Smith, M. & Stoljar, D., 1998, ‘Global Response-Dependence and Noumenal Realism’, The Monist 81: 85–111. (Scholar)
- Steinberg, J., 2010, ‘Dispositions and Subjunctives’, Philosophical Studies, 148: 323–341. (Scholar)
- Steinberg, J. & Steinberg, A., 2017, ‘A Multiply Qualified Conditional Analysis of Disposition Ascription: Mapping the Conceptual Topography of Ceteris Paribus’, Erkenntnis, 82: 777–793. (Scholar)
- Storer, T., 1951, ‘On Defining
“Soluble”’, Analysis, 11: 134–137. (Scholar)
- Strawson, P.F., 1980, ‘Reply to Evans’, in Z. van Straaten (ed.), Philosophical Subjects: Essays Presented to P.F. Strawson, New York: Oxford University Press, 273–282. (Scholar)
- Swinburne, R., 1980, ‘Properties, Causation, and Projectibility: Reply to Shoemaker’, in L.J. Cohen & M. Hesse (eds.), Applications of Inductive Logic, Oxford: Clarendon, 313–320. (Scholar)
- Swoyer, C., 1982, ‘The Nature of Natural Laws’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 60: 203–223. (Scholar)
- Taylor, H., 2018a, ‘Powerful Qualities, Phenomenal Concepts and the New Challenge to Physicalism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 96: 53–66. (Scholar)
- –––, 2018b, ‘Powerful Qualities and Pure Powers’, Philosophical Studies, 175: 1423–1440 (Scholar)
- Teller, P., 2002, ‘Critical Study: Nancy Cartwright’s The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science’, Noûs, 36: 699–725. (Scholar)
- Tooley, M., 1977, ‘The Nature of Laws’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 7: 667–698. (Scholar)
- Tugby, M., 2013, ‘Platonic Dispositionalism’, Mind 122: 451–480. (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, ‘Categoricalism, Dispositionalism, and the Epistemology of Properties’, Synthese, 191: 1147–1162. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, ‘On the Reality of Intrinsically Finkable Dispositions’, Philosophia, 44: 623–631. (Scholar)
- Vetter, B., 2013, ‘Multi-track Dispositions’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 63: 330–352. (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, ‘Dispositions without Conditionals’, Mind, 123: 129–156. (Scholar)
- –––, 2015, Potentiality: From Dispositions to Modality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Whittle, A., 2006, ‘On an Argument for Humility’, Philosophical Studies, 130: 461–497. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, ‘A Functionalist Theory of Properties’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 77: 59–82. (Scholar)
- Williams, N.E., 2009, ‘The Ungrounded Argument Is Unfounded: A Response to Mumford’, Synthese, 170: 7–19. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, ‘Puzzling Powers: The Problem of Fit’, in A. Marmodoro (ed.), The Metaphysics of Powers: Their Grounding and Their Manifestations, New York: Routledge, 84–105. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, ‘Dispositions and the Argument from Science’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 89: 79–90. (Scholar)
- Williams, N.E. & Borghini, A., 2008, ‘A Dispositional Theory of Possibility’, Dialectica, 62: 21–41. (Scholar)
- Yablo, S., 1992, ‘Mental Causation’, The Philosophical Review, 101: 245–280. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, ‘Intrinsicness’, Philosophical Topics, 26: 590–627. (Scholar)
- Yates, D., forthcoming, ‘Inverse Functionalism and the Individuation of Powers’, Synthese, first online 12 May 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11229-017-1417-9 (Scholar)