Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Dutch Book Arguments" by Susan Vineberg

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Adams Ernest W., 1962, “On Rational Betting Systems”, Archiv für mathematische Logik and Grundlagenforschung, 6: 7–29. (Scholar)
Adams, Ernest W. and Roger D. Rosenkrantz, 1980, “Applying the Jeffrey Decision Model to Rational Betting and Information Acquisition”, Theory and Decision, 12: 1–20. (Scholar)
Armendt, Brad, 1980, “Is There a Dutch Book Argument for Probability Kinematics”, 47: 583–588. (Scholar)
–––, 1993, “Dutch Books, Additivity and Utility Theory”, Philosophical Topics, 21 (1): 1–20. (Scholar)
Bacchus, F., H.E. Kyburg, and M. Thalos, 1990, “Against Conditionalization”, Synthese, (85): 475–506. (Scholar)
Bradley, Darren, and Hannes Leitgeb, 2006, “When Betting Odds and Credences Come Apart: More Worries for Dutch Book Arguments”, Analysis, 66 (2): 119–127. (Scholar)
Briggs, Rachael, 2009, “Distorted Reflection”, Philosophical Review, 118 (1): 59–85. (Scholar)
Christensen, David, 1991, “Clever Bookies and Coherent Beliefs”, The Philosophical Review, 100 (2): 229–247. (Scholar)
–––, 1996, “Dutch-Book Arguments Depragmatized: Epistemic Consistency For Partial Believers”, The Journal of Philosophy, 93: 450–479. (Scholar)
–––, 2004, Putting Logic in its Place, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
de Finetti, Bruno, 1937, “Foresight: Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources”, in Henry E. Kyburg and Howard E.K Smokler (eds.), Studies in Subjective Probability, Huntington, NY: Robert E. Kreiger Publishing Co. (Scholar)
–––, 1972, Probability, Induction and Statistics, New York: Wiley. (Scholar)
Draper, Kai and Joel Pust, 2008, “Diachronic Dutch Books and Sleeping Beauty”, Synthese, 164.2: 281-287. (Scholar)
Elga, Adam, 2000, “Self-locating Belief and the Sleeping Beauty Problem”, Analysis, 60 (2): 143–147. (Scholar)
–––, 2020, “Subjective Probabilities Should be Sharp”, Philosopher’s Imprint, 10 (5): 1-11. (Scholar)
Gallow, J. Dimitri, 2019, “Diachronic Dutch Books and Evidential Import”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, XCIX (1): 49-80. (Scholar)
Hájek, Alan, 2005, “Scotching Dutch Books?” in John Hawthorne (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 19: 139–51. (Scholar)
–––, 2008a, “Arguments For-or Against-Probabilism?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59: 793–819. (Scholar)
–––, 2008b, “Dutch Book Arguments”, in Paul Anand, Prasanta Pattanaik and Clemens Puppe (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Rational and Social Choice, pp. 173–195, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Hedden, Brian, 2013, “Incoherence without Exploitability”, Noûs 47(3): 482-495. (Scholar)
–––, 1997, “Bayes and Beyond”, Philosophy of Science, 64 (2): 191–221. (Scholar)
Hitchcock, Christopher, 2004, “Beauty and the Bets”, Synthese, 139: 405–420. (Scholar)
Howson, Colin, and Peter Urbach, 1993, Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach, second edition, La Salle, Illinois: Open Court. (Scholar)
Huttegger, Simon M., 2013, “In Defense of Reflection”, Philosophy of Science, 80 (3): 413-433. (Scholar)
Jackson, Frank, and Robert Pargetter, 1976, “A Modified Dutch Book Argument”, Philosophical Studies, 29: 403–407. (Scholar)
Jeffrey, Richard, 2004, Subjective Probability: The Real Thing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1983, The Logic of Decision, second edition, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Kaplan, Mark, 1996, Decision Theory as Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Kemeny, John, 1955, “Fair Bets and Inductive Probabilities ”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 20 (3): 263–273. (Scholar)
Kennedy, Ralph, and Charles Chihara, 1979, “The Dutch Book Argument: Its Logical Flaws, Its Subjective Sources”, Philosophical Studies, 36: 19–33. (Scholar)
Lehman, R. Sherman, 1955, “On Confirmation and Rational Betting”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 20 (3): 251–262. (Scholar)
Levi, Isaac, 2002, “Money Pumps and Diachronic Dutch Books”, Philosophy of Science, 69 (3): S235–247. (Scholar)
Lewis, David, 1999, Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2001, “Sleeping Beauty: reply to Elga”, Analysis, 61 (3): 171–176. (Scholar)
Maher, Patrick, 1993, Betting on Theories, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1997, “Depragmatized Dutch Book Arguments”, Philosophy of Science, 64 (2): 291–305. (Scholar)
Mahtani, Anna, 2012, “Diachronic Dutch Book Arguments”, The Philosophical Review, 121 (3): 443-450. (Scholar)
–––, 2015, “Dutch Books, Coherence, and Logical Consistency”, Noûs, 49: 522-537. (Scholar)
McGee, Vann, 1999, “An Airtight Dutch Book”, Analysis, 59 (4): 257–265. (Scholar)
Pettigrew, Richard, 2019, “Epistemic Utility Arguments for Probabilism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/epistemic-utility/>. (Scholar)
–––, 2020, Dutch Book Arguments, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Pust, Joel, 2021, “Dutch Books and Logical Form”, Philosophy of Science, 88: 961-970. (Scholar)
Ramsey, F.P., 1926., “Truth and Probability”, in Henry E. Kyburg and Howard E.K Smokler (eds.), Studies in Subjective Probability, Huntington, NY: Robert E. Kreiger Publishing Co. (Scholar)
Rescorla, Michael, 2018, “A Dutch Book Theorem and Converse Dutch Book Theorem for Kolmogorov Conditionalization”, The Review of Symbolic Logic, 11 (4): 708-735. (Scholar)
Rowbottom, Darrell P., 2007, “The Insufficiency of the Dutch Book Argument”, Studia Logica: An International Journal for Symbolic Logic, 87 (1): 65-71. (Scholar)
Savage, L.J., 1954, The Foundations of Statistics, New York: Wiley. (Scholar)
Seidenfeld, Teddy, and Mark J. Schervish, 1983, “A Conflict Between Finite Additivity and Avoiding Dutch Book”, Philosophy of Science, 50: 398–412. (Scholar)
Shimony, Abner, 1955, “Coherence and the Axioms of Confirmation”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 20 (3): 1–28. (Scholar)
Skyrms, Brian, 1987a, “Coherence”, in N. Rescher (ed.), Scientific Inquiry in Philosophical Perspective, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 225–242. (Scholar)
–––, 1987b, “Dynamic Coherence and Probability Kinematics”, Philosophy of Science, 54: 1–20. (Scholar)
Talbott, W., 1991, “Two Principles of Bayesian Epistemology”, Philosophical Studies, 62: 135–150. (Scholar)
Teller, Paul, 1973, “Conditionalization and Observation”, Synthese, 26: 218–258. (Scholar)
van Fraassen, Bas, 1995, “Belief and the Problem of Ulysses and the Sirens”, Philosophical Studies, 77: 7–37. (Scholar)
–––, 1984, “Belief and the Will”, Journal of Philosophy, 81 (May): 235–256. (Scholar)
–––, 1989, Laws and Symmetry, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Vineberg, Susan, 1997, “Dutch Books, Dutch Strategies and What They Show About Rationality”, Philosophical Studies, 86: 185–201. (Scholar)
–––, 2001, “The Notion of Consistency for Partial Belief”, Philosophical Studies, 102: 281–296. (Scholar)
Weatherson, Brian, 2003, “From Classical to Intuitionistic Probability”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 44 (2): 111-23. (Scholar)
Williamson, Jon, 1999, “Countable Additivity and Subjective Probability”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50: 401–416. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Sep 15 16:37:26 2024

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...