Pagination of in-text citations follows that of the reprint, where page numbers for the latter are given below.

• Alexander, Joshua, Ronald Mallon, and Jonathan M. Weinberg, 2010, “Accentuate the Negative”, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1(2): 297–314. (Scholar)
• Almeder, Robert, 1990, “On Naturalizing Epistemology”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 27(4): 263–279. (Scholar)
• Anderson, Elizabeth, 2012, “Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Fall 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/feminism-epistemology/>. (Scholar)
• Anderson. R. Lanier, 2005, “Neo-Kantianism and the Roots of Anti-Psychologism”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 13(2): 287–323. (Scholar)
• Antony, Louise, 1993, “Quine As Feminist: The Radical Import of Naturalized Epistemology”, in Louise Antony and Charlotte Witt (eds.), A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 185–226. (Scholar)
• Armstrong, D.M., 1968, A Materialist Theory of the Mind, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
• –––, 1973, Belief, Truth, and Knowledge, Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Bach, Kent, 1984, “Default Reasoning: Jumping to Conclusions and Knowing When to Think Twice”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 65: 37–58. (Scholar)
• –––, 1985, “A Rationale for Reliabilism”, The Monist, 68 (2): 246–263. (Scholar)
• Bealer, George, 1992, “The Incoherence of Empiricism”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 66: 99–138. (Scholar)
• Bishop, Michael A. and J.D. Trout, 2005a, “The Pathologies of Standard Analytic Epistemology”, Nous, 39(4): 696–714. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005b, Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Bloor, D., 1981, “The Strengths of the Strong Programme”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11: 199–213. (Scholar)
• BonJour, Laurence, 1994, “Against Naturalized Epistemology”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XIX: 283–300. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, “Kornblith on Knowledge and Epistemology”, Philosophical Studies, 127(2): 317–335. (Scholar)
• Bradie, Michael and William Harms, 2015, “Evolutionary Epistemology”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Summer 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/epistemology-evolutionary/>. (Scholar)
• Brandom, Robert 1998, “Insights and Blindspots of Reliabilism”, The Monist, 81(3): 371–392. (Scholar)
• Buckwalter, Wesley and Stephen Stich, 2011, “Gender and the Philosophy Club”, The Philosophers’ Magazine, 52: 60–65. (Scholar)
• Campbell, Richmond, 1998, Illusions of Paradox, Boulder: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. (Scholar)
• Carnap, Rudolph, 1967, The Logical Structure of the World and Pseudoproblems in Philosophy, translated by Rolf George, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Scholar)
• Casullo, Albert and Joshua C. Thurow (eds.), 2013, The A Priori in Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Cherniak, Christopher, 1986, Minimal Rationality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Chisholm, Roderick, 1957, Perceiving, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1966, Theory of Knowledge, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
• –––, 1977, Theory of Knowledge, 2^nd edition, New York: Prentice Hall. (Scholar)
• –––, 1982, The Foundations of Knowing, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1989, Theory of Knowledge, 3^rd edition, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
• Chrisman, Matthew, 2007, “From Epistemic Contextualism to Epistemic Expressivism”, Philosophical Studies, 135: 225–54. (Scholar)
• Churchland, Patricia Smith, 1987, “Epistemology in the Age of Neuroscience”, The Journal of Philosophy, 84(10): 544–553. (Scholar)
• Clough, Sharyn, 2004, “Having it All: Naturalized Normativity in Feminist Science Studies”, Hypatia, 19(1): 102–118. (Scholar)
• Code, Lorraine, 1996, “What is Natural about Epistemology Naturalized?”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 33(1): 1–22. (Scholar)
• Crumley II, Jack S., 2009, An Introduction to Epistemology, 2^nd edition, Broadview Press (Scholar)
• Daniels, Norman, 1989, Thomas Reid’s “Inquiry”: The Geometry of Visibles and the Case for Realism, 2^nd ed., with a new Afterword, Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
• Descartes, René, 1988, Descartes: Selected Philosophical Writings, translated by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, and D. Murdoch, with an Introduction by John Cottingham, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Dretske, Fred, 1970, “Epistemic Operators”, The Journal of Philosophy, 67(24): 1007–1023. (Scholar)
• –––, 1981, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Cambridge MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1983, “Précis of Knowledge and the Flow of Information”, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6: 55–90. (Scholar)
• –––, 1989, “The Need to Know”, in Marjorie Clay and Keith Lehrer (eds.), Knowledge and Scepticism, Westview Press, pp. 89–100. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991, “Two Conceptions of Knowledge: Rational vs. Reliable Belief”, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 4: 15–30. Reprinted in Dretske, Perception, Knowledge and Belief, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 80–93. (Scholar)
• Dreier, J., 2001, “Humean Doubts about Categorical Imperatives”, in E. Millgram (ed.), Varieties of Practical Reasoning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 27–47. (Scholar)
• Engel, Pascal, 1998, “The Psychologists Return”, Synthese, 115(3): 375–393. (Scholar)
• Feldman, Richard, 1999, “Methodological Naturalism in Epistemology”, in John Greco and Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 170–186. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Naturalized Epistemology”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Summer 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/epistemology-naturalized/>. (Scholar)
• Field, Hartry, 1998, “Epistemological Nonfactualism and the A Prioricity of Logic”, Philosophical Studies, 92(1–2): 1–24. (Scholar)
• Foley, Richard, 1994, “Quine and Naturalized Epistemology”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XIX: 243–260. (Scholar)
• Frege, Gottlob, 1884, The Foundations of Arithmetic, translated by J.L. Austin, New York: Harper & Brothers, 1950. (Scholar)
• Fumerton, Richard, 1988, “The Internalism/Externalism Controversy”, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 2, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Co., pp. 443–459. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994, “Skepticism and Naturalistic Epistemology”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XIX: 321–340. (Scholar)
• Goldman, Alvin, 1967, “A Causal Theory of Knowing”, The Journal of Philosophy, 64: 357–372. Reprinted in Goldman 1992: 69–83. (Scholar)
• –––, 1976, “Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge”, The Journal of Philosophy, 73(20): 771–791. Reprinted in Goldman 1992: 85–103. (Scholar)
• –––, 1979, “What is Justified Belief?”, in George Pappas (ed.), Justification and Knowledge: New Studies in Epistemology, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 1–23. Reprinted in Goldman 1992: 106–126, and Goldman 2012. (Scholar)
• –––, 1986, Epistemology and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1989, “Psychology and Philosophical Analysis”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 89: 195–209. Reprinted in Goldman 1992: 143–153. (Scholar)
• –––, 1992, Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994, “Naturalistic Epistemology and Reliabilism”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XIX: 301–320. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999a, “A Priori Warrant and Naturalistic Epistemology”, in Tomberlin, J.E. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, v. 13, Cambridge, UK: Blackwell. Reprinted in Goldman 2002: 24–50. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999b, Knowledge in a Social World, Oxford, UK: Clarendon. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, Pathways to Knowledge: Public and Private, Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, “Kornblith’s Naturalistic Epistemology”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 71(2): 403–410. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Philosophical Intuitions: Their Target, Their Source, and Their Epistemic Status”, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 74: 1–26. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, “Philosophical Naturalism and Intuitional Methodology”, The Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 84(2): 115–150. Reprinted in Goldman 2012 and Casullo and Thurow (eds.) 2013. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “Reliabilism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Spring 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <Reliabilism/">https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/Reliabilism/>. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, Reliabilism and Contemporary Epistemology: Essays, Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015, “Review of Hilary Kornblith, A Naturalistic Epistemology: Selected Papers”, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, available online. (Scholar)
• Goldman, Alvin and Thomas Blanchard, 2015, “Social Epistemology”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Summer 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/epistemology-social/>. (Scholar)
• Goldman, Alvin and J. Pust, 1998, “Philosophical Theory and Intuitional Evidence”, in M. DePaul and W. Ramsey (eds.), Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
• Goldman, Alvin and Dennis Whitcomb (eds.), 2011, Social Epistemology: Essential Readings, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Graham, Peter J., 2012, “Epistemic Entitlement”, Nous, 46(3): 449–482. (Scholar)
• Grandy, Richard, 1994, “Epistemology Naturalized and ‘Epistemology Naturalized’”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XIX: 341–349. (Scholar)
• Grasswick, Heidi, 2013, “Feminist Social Epistemology”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Spring 2013 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/feminist-social-epistemology/>. (Scholar)
• Gregory, Paul A., 2006, “Willard Van Quine”, in The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia, Sahotra Sarkar and Jessica Pfeifer (eds.), New York and London: Routledge, pp. 659–669. (Scholar)
• Hampton, Jean, 1992, “Rethinking Reason”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 29(3): 219–236. (Scholar)
• Harman, Gilbert, 1986, Change in View: Principles of Reasoned Revision, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, Reasoning, Meaning and Mind, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Haug, Matthew (ed.), 2013, Philosophical Methodology: The Armchair or the Laboratory?, London and New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Hookway, Christopher, 2015, “Pragmatism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Spring 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <Pragmatism/">https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/Pragmatism/>. (Scholar)
• Hume, David, 1739, A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. (Scholar)
• Husserl, Edmund, 1900, Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Teil: Prolegomena zur reinen Logik (Logical Investigations, Vol. 1), translated by J.N. Findlay from the 2^nd German edition of Logische Untersuchungen, with a new Preface by Michael Dummett, London & New York: Routledge, 2001. (Scholar)
• Ichikawa, Jonathan Jenkins and Matthias Steup, 2014, “The Analysis of Knowledge”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Spring 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/knowledge-analysis/>. (Scholar)
• Jenkins, C.S., 2007, “Epistemic Norms and Natural Facts”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 44(3): 259–272. (Scholar)
• Johnsen, Bredo, 2005, “How to Read ‘Epistemology Naturalized’”, The Journal of Philosophy, 102(2): 78–93. (Scholar)
• Kappel, Klemens, 2011, “Naturalistic Epistemology”, in Sven Bernecker and Duncan Pritchard (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Epistemology, New York: Routledge, pp. 836–847. (Scholar)
• Kaplan, Mark, 1994, “Epistemology Denatured”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XIX: 350–365. (Scholar)
• Kelly, T., 2003, “Epistemic Rationality as Instrumental Rationality: A Critique”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 66(3): 612–40. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, “Quine and Epistemology”, in G. Harman and E. Lepore (eds.), A Companion to W.V.O. Quine, Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 17–37. (Scholar)
• Kim, Jaegwon, 1988, “What is Naturalized Epistemology?”, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 2, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Co., pp. 381–406. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, “The American Origins of Philosophical Naturalism”, Journal of Philosophical Research (Supplement: Philosophy in America at the Turn of the Century), 28: 83–98. (Scholar)
• Kim, Minsun, and Yuan Yuan, 2015, “No Cross-Cultural Differences in the Gettier Car Case Intuition: A Replication Study of Weinberg et al. 2001”, Episteme, 12(3): 355–361. (Scholar)
• Kitcher, Philip, 1980, “A Priori Knowledge”, The Philosophical Review, 86(1): 3–23. (Scholar)
• –––, 1992, “The Naturalists Return”, Philosophical Review, 101(1): 53–114. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993, The Advancement of Science, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Kornblith, Hilary, 1993a, Inductive Inference and its Natural Ground, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993b, “Epistemic Normativity”, Synthese, 94: 357–76. Reprinted in Kornblith 2014. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994a, “Introduction: What is Naturalistic Epistemology?”, in Kornblith (ed.), Naturalizing Epistemology, 2d ed., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–14. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994b, “Naturalism: Both Metaphysical and Epistemological”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XIX: 39–52. Reprinted in Kornblith 2014. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995, “Naturalistic Epistemology and Its Critics”, Philosophical Topics, 23(1): 237–255. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, “In Defense of a Naturalized Epistemology”, in John Greco and Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 158–169. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, “Epistemic Obligation and the Possibility of Internalism”, in Abrol Fairweather and Linda Zagzebski (eds.), Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 231–248. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, Knowledge and Its Place in Nature, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, “Reply to Bermudez and BonJour”, Philosophical Studies, 127(2): 337–349. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Naturalism and Intuitions”, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 74: 27–49. Reprinted in Kornblith 2014. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, A Naturalistic Epistemology: Selected Papers, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Kuhn, T.S., 1996, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3^rd ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Kusch, Martin, 2002, Knowledge by Agreement: the Programme of Communitarian Epistemology, Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, “Psychologism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Spring 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <Psychologism/">https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/Psychologism/>. (Scholar)
• Lackey, Jennifer (ed.), 2014, Essays in Collective Epistemology, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Laudan, Larry, 1987, “Progress or Rationality? The Prospects for Normative Naturalism”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 24(1): 19–31. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990, “Normative Naturalism”, Philosophy of Science, 57(1): 44–59. (Scholar)
• Lehrer, Keith, 1990, Theory of Knowledge, Boulder: Westview Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1997, Self-Trust: A Study of Reason, Knowledge and Autonomy, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Levin, Janet, 2013, “Armchair Methodology and Epistemological Naturalism”, Synthese, 190(18): 4117–4136. (Scholar)
• Locke, John, 1690, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, edited with an Introduction by Peter H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975. (Scholar)
• Longino, Helen, 1999, “Feminist Epistemology”, in John Greco and Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 327–353. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Lycan, William, 1988, Judgement and Justification, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Machery, Edouard and O’Neill, Elizabeth (eds.), 2014, Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Machery, Edouard, Stephen Stich, David Rose, Amita Chatterjee, Kaori Karasawa, Noel Struchiner, Smita Sirker, Naoki Usui, and Takaaki Hashimoto, 2015, “Gettier Across Cultures”, Noûs, online. doi:10.1111/nous.12110 (Scholar)
• Maffie, James, 1990a, “Recent Work on Naturalizing Epistemology”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 27: 281–293. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990b, “Naturalism and the Normativity of Epistemology”, Philosophical Studies, 59: 333–349. (Scholar)
• McLaughlin, Brian and Karen Bennett, 2014, “Supervenience”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Spring 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <Supervenience/">https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/Supervenience/>. (Scholar)
• Millikan, Ruth, 1984, “Naturalist Reflections on Knowledge”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 65(4): 315–334. Reprinted in White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993. (Scholar)
• Nagel, Jennifer, 2007, “Epistemic Intuitions”, Philosophy Compass, 2(6): 792–819. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Intuitions and Experiments: A Defense of the Case Method in Epistemology”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 85(3): 495–527. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, “Defending the Evidential Value of Epistemic Intuitions: A Reply to Stich”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 86(1): 179–199. (Scholar)
• Nagel, Jennifer and Kenneth Boyd, 2014, “The Reliability of Epistemic Intuitions”, in Machery and O’Neill 2014: 109–127. (Scholar)
• Nagel, Jennifer, Valerie San Juan, and Raymond A. Mar, 2013, “Lay Denial of Knowledge for Justified True Beliefs”, Cognition, 129(3): 652–661. (Scholar)
• Nelson, Lynn Hankinson, 1990, Who Knows: From Quine to a Feminist Empiricism, Philadelphia: Temple University Press. (Scholar)
• Nozick, Robert, 1983, Philosophical Explanations, Cambridge MA: The Belnap Press of Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Pacherie, Elisabeth, 2002, “Naturalistic Epistemologies and Normativity”, Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 2(6): 299–317. (Scholar)
• Papineau, David, 1993, Philosophical Naturalism, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Pappas, George, 2014, “Internalist vs. Externalist Conceptions of Epistemic Justification”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Fall 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/justep-intext/>. (Scholar)
• Pollock, John, 1986, Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, Totawa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
• –––, 1987, “Epistemic Norms”, Synthese, 71(1): 61–95. (Scholar)
• Pollock, John and J. Cruz, 1999, Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, 2^nd ed., Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
• Pust, Joel, 2014, “Intuition”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Fall 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <Intuition/">https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/Intuition/>. (Scholar)
• Putnam, Hilary, 1982, “Why Reason Can’t Be Naturalized”, Synthese, 52(1): 3–23. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994a, Words and Life, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994b, “Sense, Nonsense, and the Senses: An Inquiry into the Powers of the Human Mind”, The Journal of Philosophy, 91(9): 445–517. (Scholar)
• Quine, W.V.O., 1969a, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1969b, “Epistemology Naturalized”, in Quine 1969a: 69–90. (Scholar)
• –––, 1969c, “Natural Kinds”, in Quine 1969a: 114–138. (Scholar)
• –––, 1975, “The Nature of Natural Knowledge”, in Samuel Guttenplan (ed.), Mind and Language, Oxford, pp. 67–81. (Scholar)
• –––, 1980, From a Logical Point of View, 2^nd ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard U P. (Scholar)
• –––, 1986, “Reply to White”, in L. Hahn and P. Schilpp (eds.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine, La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, pp. 663–665. (Scholar)
• –––, 1989, Quiddities: An Intermittently Philosophical Dictionary, Belnap Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990, “Comment on Lauener”, in Robert Barrett and Roger Gibson (eds.), Perspectives on Quine, Cambridge, MA: Bradford MIT, p. 229. (Scholar)
• –––, 1992, Pursuit of Truth, revised edition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995, “Naturalism; Or, Living Within One’s Means”, Dialectica, 49(2/4): 251–261. (Scholar)
• Ramsey, Frank Plumpton, 1931, The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays, R. B. Braithwaite (ed.), London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
• Reichenbach, Hans, 1938, Experience and Prediction, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Reid, Thomas, 1764, An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense, Derek R. Brookes (ed.), Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1997. (Scholar)
• Richardson, Alan, 2006, “Rational Reconstruction”, in Sahotra Sarkar and Jessica Pfeifer (eds.), The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 681–685. (Scholar)
• Roth, Michael D. and Leon Galis (eds.), 1970, Knowing: Essays on the Analysis of Knowledge, Lanham, New York, London: University Press of America. (Scholar)
• Russell, Bruce, 2014, “A Priori Justification and Knowledge”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Summer 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/apriori/>. (Scholar)
• Rysiew, Patrick, 2002, “Reid and Epistemic Naturalism”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 52(209): 437–56. Reprinted in John Haldane and Stephen Read (eds.), The Philosophy of Thomas Reid: A Collection of Essays, Oxford: Blackwell, 2003, pp. 24–43. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008, “Rationality Disputes: Psychology and Epistemology”, Philosophy Compass, 3(6): 1153–1176. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Rationality”, in Oxford Bibliographies in Philosophy, Duncan Pritchard (ed.), New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, “Veritism, Values, Epistemic Norms”, Philosophical Topics, 45(1): 181–203. (Scholar)
• Samet, Jerry and Deborah Zaitchik, 2014, “Innateness and Contemporary Theories of Cognition”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Fall 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/innateness-cognition/>. (Scholar)
• Schmitt, Frederick F., 1994, “Socializing Epistemology: An Introduction Through Two Sample Issues”, in Frederick Schmitt (ed.), Socializing Epistemology, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 1–27. (Scholar)
• Sellars, Wilfred, 1956, “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind” in Herbert Feigl and Michael Scriven (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume I: The Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis, University of Minnesota Press, pp. 253–329. Reprinted in Science, Perception, and Reality, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963, pp. 127–196. (Scholar)
• Seyedsayamdost, Hamid, 2015, “On Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions: Failure of Replication”, Episteme, 12(1): 95–116. (Scholar)
• Siegel, Harvey, 1980 “Justification, Discovery and the Naturalizing of Epistemology”, Philosophy of Science, 47: 297–321. (Scholar)
• –––, 1984, “Empirical Psychology, Naturalized Epistemology, and First Philosophy”, Philosophy of Science, 51(4): 667–676. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990, “Laudan’s Normative Naturalism”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 21(2): 295–313. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, “Review of Knowledge and Its Place in Nature”, The Philosophical Review, 115(2): 246–251. (Scholar)
• Sosa, Ernest, 2003, “Epistemology: Does it Depend on Independence?”, in Erik J. Olsson (ed.), The Epistemology of Keith Lehrer, Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 23–30. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Intuitions: Their Nature and Epistemic Efficacy”, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 74: 51–67. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “A Defense of the Use of Intuitions in Philosophy”, in Michael Bishop and Dominic Murphy (eds.), Stich and His Critics, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 101–112. (Scholar)
• Stein, Edward, 1996, Without Good Reason, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Steup, Matthias, 1996, An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology, Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
• Stich, Stephen, 1990, The Fragmentation of Reason, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993, “Naturalizing Epistemology: Quine, Simon and the Prospects for Pragmatism”, in Hookway & D. Peterson (eds.), Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Royal Institute of Philosophy, Supplement no. 34, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–17. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, “Review of Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment, by Michael A. Bishop and J.D. Trout”, Mind, 115(458): 390–393. (Scholar)
• Stroud, Barry, 1977, Hume, London and New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• –––, 1981 “The Significance of Epistemology Naturalized”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 6(1): 455–471. (Scholar)
• –––, 1984, The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Swain, S., J. Alexander, and J.M. Weinberg, 2008, “The Instability of Philosophical Intuitions: Running Hot and Cold on Truetemp”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 76(1): 138–155. (Scholar)
• Talbott, William J., 2005, “Universal Knowledge”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 71(2): 420–426. (Scholar)
• Turri, John, 2010, “Epistemic Supervenience”, in Jonathan Dancy, Ernest Sosa and Matthias Steup (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Epistemology, 2^nd ed., Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 340–343. (Scholar)
• Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman, 1982, “Judgments of and by Representativeness”, in Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky (eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 84–98. (Scholar)
• Van Cleve, James, 1999, “Epistemic Supervenience Revisited”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 59(4): 1049–1055. (Scholar)
• Van Fraassen, Bas, 1995, “Against Naturalized Epistemology”, in Paolo Leonardi and Marco Santambrogio (eds), On Quine: New Essays, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 68–88. (Scholar)
• Van Riel, Raphael and Robert Van Gulick, 2014, “Scientific Reduction”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Summer 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/scientific-reduction/>. (Scholar)
• Wallace, R. Jay, 2014, “Practical Reason”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Summer 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/practical-reason/>. (Scholar)
• Wason, P.C., 1968, “Reasoning about a Rule”, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20: 273–81. (Scholar)
• Weinberg, J.S., S. Nichols, and S. Stich, 2001, “Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions”, Philosophical Topics, 29(1): 429–460. (Scholar)
• Williams, Michael, 1996, Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism, Princeton N.J.: University Press. (Scholar)
• Williamson, Timothy, 2013, “Review of Joshua Alexander, Experimental Philosophy”, Philosophy, 88(03): 467–474. (Scholar)
• Wrenn, Chase B., 2006, “Epistemology as Engineering?”, Theoria, 72(1): 60–79. (Scholar)