Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Pregnancy, Birth, and Medicine" by Quill R Kukla, Teresa Baron and Katherine Wayne
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Armstrong, Elizabeth M., 2003, Conceiving Risk, Bearing
Responsibility: Fetal Alcohol Syndrome and the Diagnosis of Moral
Disorder, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
- Asch, Adrienne, 2000, “Why I have not changed my mind about
prenatal diagnosis: reflections and refinements”, in Parens and
Asch (eds.), Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights,
Washington: Georgetown University Press, 234–258. (Scholar)
- Asch, Adrienne, and David Wasserman, 2005, “Where Is the Sin
in Synecdoche? Prenatal Testing and the Parent-Child
Relationship” in Wasserman, Bickenbach and Wachbroit (eds.),
Quality of Life and Human Difference, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 172–216. (Scholar)
- Ballantyne, Angela, Gavaghan, Colin, McMillan, John, and Pullon, Sue, 2016, “Pregnancy and the culture of extreme risk aversion”, The American Journal of Bioethics, 16(2): 21–23. (Scholar)
- Baron, Teresa, 2019, “Nobody Puts Baby in the Container: The Foetal Container Model at Work in Medicine and Commercial Surrogacy”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 36(3): 491–505. (Scholar)
- –––, 2023a, The Philosopher’s Guide to
Parenthood: Storks, Surrogates and Stereotypes. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2023b, ‘Domácí
Porody’, in M. Chvílová Weberová, J.
Matějek, and B. Steinlauf (eds.) Etika v Pediatrii a
Neonatologii, Prague: Grada Publishing, 152–57. (Scholar)
- Baylis, Françoise, Rodgers, Sandra, and Young, David, 2008, “Ethical dilemmas in the care of pregnant women: rethinking ‘maternal-fetal conflicts’”, in Singer and Viens (eds.), The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics, Cambridge University Press, 97–103. (Scholar)
- Beck, Cheryl Tatano, 2018, “A Secondary Analysis of
Mistreatment of Women During Childbirth in Health Care
Facilities”, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic &
Neonatal Nursing, 47(1): 94–104. (Scholar)
- Beckett, Katherine, 2005, “Choosing Cesarean: Feminism and the politics of childbirth in the United States”, Feminist Theory, 6: 251–275. (Scholar)
- Benatar, David, 2006, Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Betrán, Ana Pilar, Jiangfeng Ye, Ann-Beth Moller,
João Paulo Souza, and Jun Zhang, 2021, “Trends and
Projections of Caesarean Section Rates: Global and Regional
Estimates”, BMJ Global Health, 6(6): e005671. (Scholar)
- Blehar, Mary, Spong, Catherine, Goldkind, Christine, Gold, Sara
F., Sahin, Leyla, and Clayton, Janine A., 2013, “Enrolling
pregnant women: issues in clinical research”, Women’s
Health Issues, 23(1): e39–45. (Scholar)
- Bohren, Meghan A., Joshua P. Vogel, Erin C. Hunter, Olha Lutsiv,
Suprita K. Makh, João Paulo Souza, Carolina Aguiar, et al,
2015, “The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health
Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review”,
PLOS Medicine, 12(6): e1001847. (Scholar)
- Boonin, David, 2014, The Non–Identity Problem and the Ethics of Future People, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Brock, Daniel, 1995, “The non-identity problem and genetic harms—the case of wrongful handicaps”, Bioethics, 8: 269–275. (Scholar)
- Bergeron, Veronique, 2007, “The ethics of cesarean section
on maternal request: a feminist critique of the American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ position on patient-choice
surgery”, Bioethics, 21(9): 478–87. (Scholar)
- Brione, Rebecca, 2015, “To What Extent Does or Should a
Woman’s Autonomy Overrule the Interests of Her Baby? A Study of
Autonomy-Related Issues in the Context of Caesarean Section”,
The New Bioethics, 21(1): 71–86. (Scholar)
- Buchanan, Allen, et al., 2000, Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Burrow, Sylvia, 2012, “On the cutting edge: ethical responsiveness to cesarean rates”, The American Journal of Bioethics, 12(7): 44–52. (Scholar)
- Byatt, Nancy, Deligiannidis, Kristina M., and Freeman, Marlene P.,
2013, “Antidepressant use in pregnancy: a critical review
focused on risks and controversies”, Acta Psychiatrica
Scandinavica, 127(2): 94–114. (Scholar)
- Camporesi, Silvia, 2010, “Choosing Deafness with Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: An Ethical Way to Carry on a Cultural Bloodline?” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 19(1): 86–96. (Scholar)
- Cantor, Julie D., 2012, “Court-ordered care—a
complication of pregnancy to avoid”, New England Journal of
Medicine, 366(24): 2237–40. (Scholar)
- Capron, Alex, 1998, “Punishing mothers”, Hastings Center Report, 28(1): 31–33. (Scholar)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), April 2014,
“Key Findings: Lifestyle During Pregnancy Study: Low to Moderate
Alcohol Use During Pregnancy and the Risk of Specific
Neurodevelopmental Effects in Five Year-Old Children”, Fetal
Alcohol Spectrum Disorders,
available online. (Scholar)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), February 2016,
“Alcohol and Pregnancy: Why take the risk?”, Vital
Signs,
available online. (Scholar)
- Chen, Chao-Yuan, and Marie Cheeseman, 2017, “European Court
of Human Rights Rulings in Home Birth Set to Cause Trouble for the
Future: A Review of Two Cases”, Medical Law Review
25(1): 115–25. (Scholar)
- Chervenak, Frank A. and Laurence B. McCullough, 1996, “The
fetus as patient: an essential ethical concept for maternal-fetal
medicine”, Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal
Medicine, 5(3): 115–19. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, “An ethical critique of
boutique fetal imaging: a case for the medicalization of fetal
imaging”, American Journal of Obstetrics and
Gynecology, 194(5): 1501. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients”, The American Journal of Bioethics, 11(5): 39–49. (Scholar)
- Chervenak, Frank A., Laurence B. McCullough, Robert L. Brent,
Malcolm I. Levene, and Birgit Arabin, 2013, “Planned Home Birth:
The Professional Responsibility Response”, American Journal
of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 208(1): 31–38. (Scholar)
- Cosgrove, Lisa, and Akansha Vaswani, 2020, “Fetal Rights, the Policing of Pregnancy, and Meanings of the Maternal in an Age of Neoliberalism”, Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 40(1): 43–53. (Scholar)
- Coverdale, J. H., L.B. McCullough and F.A. Chervenak, 2004,
“Assisted and surrogate decision making for pregnant patients
who have schizophrenia:” Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30(3):
659–64. (Scholar)
- Crossley, Michele, 2007, “Childbirth, complications, and the
illusion of ‘choice’: A case study”, Feminism
and Psychology, 17(4): 543–563. (Scholar)
- Criado-Perez, Caroline, 2020, Invisible Women: Exposing Data
Bias in a World Designed for Men. New York: Random House. (Scholar)
- Davis, Dena, 2001, Genetic Dilemmas: Reproductive
Technologies, Parental Choices, and Children’s Futures, New
York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Deshpande, Neha A., and Corrina M. Oxford, 2012, “Management
of Pregnant Patients Who Refuse Medically Indigated Cesarean
Delivery”, Reviews in Obstetrics and Gynecology
5(3–4): 144–50. (Scholar)
- Diekema, Douglas S., 2003, “Involuntary sterilization of
persons with mental retardation: an ethical analysis”,
Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research
Reviews, 9(1): 21–6. (Scholar)
- Drabble, Laurie A., Poole, Nancy, Magri, Raquel, Tumwesigye,
Nazarius Mbona, Li, Qing, and Plant, Moira, 2011, “Conceiving
risk, divergent responses: perspectives on the construction of risk of
FASD in six countries”, Substance Use and Misuse,
46(8): 943–58. (Scholar)
- Duden, Barbara, 1993, Disembodying Women: Perspectives on
Pregnancy and the Unborn, Cambridge: Harvard University
Press. (Scholar)
- Ecker, Jeffrey L., 2014, “Death in pregnancy—an
American tragedy”, New England Journal of Medicine,
370(10): 889–91. (Scholar)
- Edwards, Steven D., 2004, “Disability, identity, and the
”expressivist objection“”, Journal of Medical
Ethics, 30(4): 418–420. (Scholar)
- Elster, Jakob, 2011, “Procreative beneficence—cui bono?”, Bioethics, 25(9): 482–488. (Scholar)
- Faherty, Laura J., Ashley M. Kranz, Joshua Russell-Fritch, Stephen
W. Patrick, Jonathan Cantor, and Bradley D. Stein, 2019,
“Association of Punitive and Reporting State Policies Related to
Substance Use in Pregnancy With Rates of Neonatal Abstinence
Syndrome”, JAMA Network Open, 2(11): e1914078. (Scholar)
- Flavin, Jeanne, and Paltrow, Lynn M., 2010, “Punishing
pregnant women: defying law, medicine, and common sense”,
Journal of Addictive Diseases, 29(2): 231–44. (Scholar)
- Flanigan, Jessica, 2016, “Obstetric Autonomy and Informed Consent”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19(1): 225–44. (Scholar)
- Fletcher, Ruth, 2014, “Contesting the Cruel Treatment of
Abortion-Seeking Women”, Reproductive Health Matters,
22(44): 10–21. (Scholar)
- Freeman, L., 2015, “Confronting diminished epistemic
privilege and epistemic injustice in pregnancy by challenging a
‘panoptics of the womb’”, The Journal of
Medicine and Philosophy, 40(1): 44–68. (Scholar)
- Gedge, Elisabeth, 2011, “Reproductive choice and the ideals of parenting”, International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 4(2): 32–47. (Scholar)
- Geller, Stacie E., Koch, Abbie, Pelletieri, Beth, and Canes,
Molly, 2011, “Inclusion, analysis, and reporting of sex and
race/ethnicity in clinical trials: have we made progress?”,
Journal of Women’s Health, 20(3): 315–320. (Scholar)
- Ghosh, Sancheeta, and K. S. James, 2010, “Levels and Trends
in Caesarean Births: Cause for Concern?” Economic and
Political Weekly, 45(5): 19–22. (Scholar)
- Giacomini, Mita and Françoise Baylis, 2003,
“Excluding women from research: reasons and rejoinders”,
Clinical Researcher, 3(10): 12–15. (Scholar)
- Gilmore, Ian, 2008, “Excessive drinking in young women: not
just a lifestyle disease”, British Medical Journal,
336: 952. (Scholar)
- Glover, Jonathan, 1977, Causing Death and Saving Lives.
London: Penguin Books. (Scholar)
- Gold, Katherine J., and Marcus, Sheila M., 2008, “Effect of
maternal illness on pregnancy outcomes”, Expert Review of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3(3): 391–401. (Scholar)
- Golden, Janet, 2006, Message in a Bottle: The Making of Fetal
Alcohol Syndrome, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Goodwin, Michele, 2014, “Fetal Protection Laws: Moral Panic
and the New Constitutional Battlefront”, California Law
Review, 102(4): 781–876. (Scholar)
- Greenwood, Nechama W., and Wilkinson, Joanne, 2013, “Sexual
and reproductive health care for women with intellectual disabilities:
a primary care perspective”, International Journal of Family
Medicine, 2013: 1–8. (Scholar)
- Haffajee, Rebecca L., Laura J. Faherty, and Kara Zivin, 2021,
“Pregnant Women with Substance Use Disorders — The Harm
Associated with Punitive Approaches”, New England Journal of
Medicine, 384(25): 2364–67. (Scholar)
- Hallgrimsdottir, Helga Kristin, and Benner, Bryan Eric, 2014,
“‘Knowledge is power’: risk and the moral
responsibilities of the expectant mother at the turn of the twentieth
century”, Health, Risk, and Society, 16(1):
7–21. (Scholar)
- Hans, S. L., 1999, “Demographic and psychosocial
characteristics of substance-abusing pregnant women”,
Clinics in Perinatology, 26(1): 55–74. (Scholar)
- Harman, Elizabeth, 1999, “Creation Ethics: The Moral Status of Early Fetuses and the Ethics of Abortion”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 28(4): 310–24. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004 “Can we harm and benefit in creating?”, Philosophical Perspectives, 18: 89–113. (Scholar)
- Heyd, David, 2009, “The intractability of the nonidentity problem”, in Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics, and the Nonidentity Problem, eds. M. Roberts and D. T. Wasserman, Dordrecht: Springer, 3–28. (Scholar)
- Horn, Claire, 2023, Eve: The Disobedient Future of Birth,
London: Profile Books. (Scholar)
- Holden, Constance, 2008, “Women abound in NIH trials”,
Science, 322: 219. (Scholar)
- Holtug, N., 2009, “Who cares about identity?”, in Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics, and the Nonidentity Problem, eds. M. Roberts and D. T. Wasserman, Dordrecht: Springer, 71–92. (Scholar)
- Hurley, Clara, 2015, “PP v Health Service Executive Case
Note”, Trinity College Law Review, 18:
205–13. (Scholar)
- Jecker, Nancy, 2012, “The right not to be born: reinterpreting the nonidentity problem”, comment on “Physicians’ duties and the non–identity problem”, American Journal of Bioethics, 12(8):34–35. (Scholar)
- Katz-Rothman, Barbara, 1993, The Tentative Pregnancy: How
Amniocentesis Changes the Experience of Motherhood, New York:
Norton. (Scholar)
- Klassen, Pamela E, 2021, “Risk, Fear, and the Ethics of Home
Birth,” in Blessed Events: Religion and Home Birth in
America, Princeton University Press, 38–62. (Scholar)
- Kingma, Elselijn, 2021, “Harming One to Benefit Another: The Paradox of Autonomy and Consent in Maternity Care”, Bioethics, 35(5): 456–64. (Scholar)
- Kingma, Elselijn, and Lindsey Porter, 2021, “Parental Obligation and Compelled Caesarean Section: Careful Analogies and Reliable Reasoning about Individual Cases”, Journal of Medical Ethics, 47: 280–286. (Scholar)
- Krause, Joan H., 2023, “Pregnancy Advance Directives”,
Cardozo Law Review, 44(3): 805–72. (Scholar)
- Kuehn, Bridget, 2006, “CDC promotes care before
conception”, JAMA: Journal of the American Medical
Association, 295(22): 2591–2.
- Kukla, Rebecca, 2005, Mass Hysteria: Medicine, Culture, and Mothers’ Bodies, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005a, “The limits of lines:
negotiating hard medical choices”, APA Newsletter on
Philosophy of Medicine, 5(1), 13–19. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, “Measuring Mothering”, International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 1(1): 67–90. (Scholar)
- Kukla, Rebecca, et al., 2009, “Finding autonomy in birth”, Bioethics, 23(1): 1–8. (Scholar)
- Kumar, R., 2003, “Who can be wronged?”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31(2): 99–112. (Scholar)
- Lawson, Karen, 2003, “Perceptions of deservedness of social
aid as a function of prenatal diagnostic testing”, Journal
of Applied Social Psychology, 33(1): 76–90. (Scholar)
- Lee, Ellie J., 2009, “Advocating alcohol abstinence to
pregnant women in Britain: some sociological observations”,
presented at the Changing Parenting Culture, seminar series,
Aston University, Birmingham, U.K. (Scholar)
- Lee, Young Mi, and D’Alton, Mary E., 2008, “Cesarean
delivery on maternal request: maternal and neonatal
complications”, Current Opinion in Obstetrics and
Gynecology, 20(6): 597–601. (Scholar)
- Limb, Matthew, 2021, “Disparity in Maternal Deaths Because
of Ethnicity Is ‘Unacceptable’”, BMJ,
372(152). (Scholar)
- Lupton, Deborah, 1998, “Risk and the ontology of pregnant
embodiment”, in Risk and Sociocultural Theory, D.
Lupton, ed., New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, 2006, “Shame, gender, birth”, Hypatia, 21(1): 101–118. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Ethics and
’normal‘ birth”, Birth, 39(4):
315–317. (Scholar)
- Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, Little, Margaret Olivia, and Faden, Ruth R.,
2008a, “A critique of the ‘fetus as patient’”,
American Journal of Bioethics, 8(7): 42–44.
- –––, 2008b, “The second wave: toward responsible inclusion of pregnant women in research”, International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1(2): 5–22. (Scholar)
- Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, and Mahowald, Mary, 2001, “Maternal-fetal surgery: the fallacy of abstraction and the problem of equipoise”, Health Care Analysis, 9(2): 151–65. (Scholar)
- Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, Mitchell, Lisa M., et al., 2009, “Risk and the pregnant body”, Hastings Center Report, 39(6): 34–42. (Scholar)
- Madeo, Anne C., Biesecker, Barbara B., Brasington, Campbell, Erby,
Lori H., and Peters, Kathryn F., 2011, “The relationship between
the genetic counselling profession and the disability community: a
commentary”, American Journal of Medical Genetics (Part
A), 155(8): 1777–1785. (Scholar)
- Mahowold, Mary B., 2002, “Aren’t we all eugenicists?
Commentary on Paul Lombardo’s taking eugenics seriously”,
Florida State University Law Review, 30: p. 219. (Scholar)
- Malacrida, Claudia, and Boulton, Tiffany, 2014, “The best
laid plans? Women’s choices, expectations, and experiences in
childbirth”, Health, 18(1): 41–59. (Scholar)
- Malek, Janet, 2010, “Deciding against disability: does the use of reproductive genetic technologies express disvalue for people with disabilities?”, Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(4): 217–21. (Scholar)
- Martin, Emily, 1989, The Woman in the Body. 2nd ed.
Milton Keynes: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Matějek, Jaromír, 2014, “Domácí
porody, odpovědnost těhotné ženy a
plánovaná účast zdravotníka”,
Pediatrie pro Praxi, 15(2): 109–10. (Scholar)
- Mattingly, S. S., 1992, “The maternal-fetal dyad: exploring the two-patient obstetric model”, Hastings Center Report, 22(1): 13–18. (Scholar)
- McMillan, John, 2014, “Making sense of child welfare when regulating human reproductive technologies”, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 11(1):47–55. (Scholar)
- McCullough, Laurence B., and Chervenak, Frank A., 2008, “A
critical analysis of the concept and discourse of ‘unborn
child’”, The American Journal of Bioethics, 8(7):
34–39.
- M’hamdi, Hafez Ismaili, and Inez de Beaufort, 2021, “Forced Caesareans: Applying Ordinary Standards to an Extraordinary Case”, Journal of Medical Ethics, 47(4): 233–38. (Scholar)
- Mills, Catherine, 2011, Futures of Reproduction, Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
- Milne, Emma, 2020, “Putting the Fetus First—Legal
Regulation, Motherhood, and Pregnancy”, Michigan Journal of
Gender & Law, 27(1): 149–212. (Scholar)
- Minkoff, Howard, 2006, “The ethics of cesarean section by
choice”, Seminars in Perinatology, 30(5):
309–312. (Scholar)
- Minkoff, Howard and Chervenak, Frank A., 2003, “Elective
primary cesarean delivery”, New England Journal of
Medicine, 348: 946–50. (Scholar)
- Minkoff, Howard, and Marshall, Mary Faith, 2016, “Fetal risks, relative risks, and relatives’ risks”, The American Journal of Bioethics, 16(2): 3–11. (Scholar)
- Mitchell, Lisa M., 2001, Baby’s First Picture:
Ultrasound and the Politics of Fetal Subjects, Toronto:
University of Toronto Press. (Scholar)
- Mullin, Amy, 2005, Reconceiving Pregnancy and Childcare: Ethics, Experience, and Reproductive Labor, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Mykitiuk, Roxanne and Scott, Dayna Nadine, 2010, “Risky
pregnancy: liability, blame, and insurance in the governance of
prenatal harm”, University of British Columbia Law
Review, 43(2): 311–360. (Scholar)
- Nelson, Hilde Lindemann, 1994, “The architect and the bee: some reflections on postmortem Pregnancy”, Bioethics 8(3): 247–267. (Scholar)
- Olsen, Anna, Banwell, Cathy, and Madden, Annie, 2014,
“Contraception, punishment, and women who use drugs”,
BioMed Central Women’s Health, 14(5),
doi:10.1186/1472-6874-14-5 (Scholar)
- Overall, Christine, 2012, Why Have Children? The Ethical Debate, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Paltrow, Lynn M., and Flavin, Jeanne, 2013, “Arrests of and
forced interventions on pregnant women in the United States,
1973–2005: implications for women’s legal status and
public health”, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and
Law, 38(2): 299–343. (Scholar)
- Parens, Erik and Asch, Adrienne (eds.), 2000, Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. (Scholar)
- Parfit, Derek, 1976, “On doing the best for our
children”, in Michael D. Bayles (ed.) Ethics and
Population, Cambridge: Schenkman Publishing Company,
59–80. (Scholar)
- –––, 1984, Reasons and Persons, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Pearlstein, Teri, 2015, “Depression during pregnancy”,
Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics &
Gynaecology, 29(5): 754–64. (Scholar)
- Press, Nancy and Browner, Carole, 1995, “Risk, autonomy, and responsibility: informed consent for prenatal testing”, Hastings Center Report, 25(3): S9–S12. (Scholar)
- Puls, Larry, Terry, R, and Hunter, James, 1997, “Primary
vaginal cancer in pregnancy: difficulty in the ethical
management”, Ethics and Medicine: An International Journal
of Bioethics, 13(3): 56–58. (Scholar)
- Purdy, Laura, 1994, “Case study: the baby in the body”, Hastings Center Report, 24(1), 32. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, “Medicalization, medical necessity, and feminist medicine”, Bioethics, 15(3): 248–261. (Scholar)
- Roberts, Dorothy, 2009, “Race, gender, and genetic
technologies: a new reproductive dystopia?”, Signs,
34(4): 783–804. (Scholar)
- Roberts, Dorothy, and Jesudason, Sujatha, 2013, “Movement
intersectionality: the case of race, gender, disability, and genetic
technologies”, Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on
Race, 10(2): 313–28. (Scholar)
- Roberts, Melinda A. and David T. Wasserman (eds.), 2009, Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics, and the Nonidentity Problem, Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
- Roberts, Sarah C.M., and Pies, Cheri, 2011, “Complex
calculations: how drug use during pregnancy becomes a barrier to
prenatal care”, Maternal and Child Health Journal,
15(3): 333–41. (Scholar)
- Robertson, John, 1996, “Genetic selection of offspring
characteristics”, Boston University Law Review, 76:
301–61. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, “Procreative liberty in the era
of genomics”, American Journal of Law and Medicine, 29:
439–87. (Scholar)
- Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe, and Anna Nelson, 2020, “Maternal Request Caesareans and COVID-19: The Virus Does Not Diminish the Importance of Choice in Childbirth”, Journal of Medical Ethics, 46: 726–731. (Scholar)
- Roth, Rachel, 2003, “Making women pay: the hidden cost of
fetal rights”, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- Rothschild, Joan, 2005, The Dream of the Perfect Child,
Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
- Sanborn, Erica, and Patterson, Annette R., 2014, “Disability
training in the genetic counseling curricula: bridging the gap between
genetic counselors and the disability community”, American
Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 164: 1909–15. (Scholar)
- Savulescu, Julian, 2001, “Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children”, Bioethics, 15(5–6): 413–426. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, “In defense of procreative beneficence”, Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(5): 284–288. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007a, “Future people, involuntary medical treatment in pregnancy and the duty of easy rescue”, Utilitas, 19: 1–20. (Scholar)
- Saxton, Marsha, 2000, “Why members of the disability
community oppose prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion”, in
Parens and Asch (eds.), Prenatal Testing and Disability
Rights, Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press,
147–164. (Scholar)
- Saxton, Marsha, 2006, “Disability rights and selective
abortion”, In Lennard Davis (ed.), The Disability Studies
Reader, New York: Routledge, 105–16. (Scholar)
- Schwartz, Peter, 2004, “Is the patient always right?”,
Hastings Center Report, 34(2): 13–14. (Scholar)
- Seigel, Marika, 2014, The Rhetoric of Pregnancy, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Shabot, Sara Cohen, and Keshet Korem, 2018, “Domesticating Bodies: The Role of Shame in Obstetric Violence”, Hypatia, 33(3): 384–401. (Scholar)
- Shakespeare, Tom, 2006, Disability Rights and Wrongs
Revisited, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Shaw, Jessica C., 2013, “The medicalization of birth and
midwifery as resistance”, Health Care for Women
International, 34(6): 522–536. (Scholar)
- Sheikh, Jameela, John Allotey, Tania Kew, Borja M
Fernández-Félix, Javier Zamora, Asma Khalil, Shakila
Thangaratinam, et al, 2022, “Effects of Race and Ethnicity on
Perinatal Outcomes in High-Income and Upper-Middle-Income Countries:
An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of 2 198 655
Pregnancies”, The Lancet, 400(10368):
2049–62. (Scholar)
- Shields, Kristine, and Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, 2013,
“Exclusion of pregnant women from industry-sponsored clinical
trials”, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 122(5):
1077–81. (Scholar)
- Smajdor, Anna, 2022, “Whole Body Gestational Donation”, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 44: 113–124. (Scholar)
- Sparrow, Robert, 2007, “Procreative beneficence, obligation, and eugenics”, Life Sciences Society and Policy, 3(3): 43. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “A not-so-new eugenics: Harris and Savulescu on human enhancement”, Hastings Center Report, 41(1): 32–42. (Scholar)
- Sperling, Daniel, 2006, Management of Post-mortem Pregnancy:
Legal and Philosophical Aspects, Aldershot: Ashgate. (Scholar)
- Steinbock, Bonnie, 2009, “Wrongful life and procreative decisions”, in M. Roberts and D. Wasserman (eds.) Harming Future Persons, Dordrecht: Springer, 155–178. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, Life Before Birth: The Moral and Legal Status of Embryos and Fetuses, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Stohl, Hindi, 2018, “Childbirth Is Not a Medical Emergency:
Maternal Right to Informed Consent throughout Labor and
Delivery”, Journal of Legal Medicine, 38(3–4):
329–53. (Scholar)
- Terplan, Mishka, Kennedy-Hendricks, Alene, and Chisolm, Margaret
S., 2015, “Prenatal substance use: exploring assumptions of
maternal unfitness”, Substance Abuse: Research and
Treatment, 9 (Supplement 2): 1–4. (Scholar)
- Tremain, Shelley, 2006, “Reproductive freedom, self-regulation, and the government of impairment in utero”, Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 21(1): 35–53. (Scholar)
- Valentine, Riley Clare, 2024, “Who Has a Meaningful Life? A Care Ethics Analysis of Selective Trait Abortion”, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, Online First. (Scholar)
- Waggoner, Miranda R. 2015, “Cultivating the Maternal Future:
Public Health and the Prepregnant Self”, Signs, 40(4):
939–62. (Scholar)
- Warren, Alex, Sarah Kelly, Antonia Karus-McElvogue, and Rowan
Burnstein, 2021, “Brain Death in Early Pregnancy: A Legal and
Ethical Challenge Coming to Your Intensive Care Unit?”
Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 22(3):
214–19. (Scholar)
- Wasserman, David, 2005, “The nonidentity problem, disability, and the role of prospective parents”, Ethics, 116(1): 132–152. (Scholar)
- Wasserman, David and Asch, Adrienne, 2012, “Selecting for disability: acceptable lives, acceptable reasons”, comment on “Physicians’ duties and the non–identity problem”, American Journal of Bioethics, 12(8): 30–31. (Scholar)
- Watt, Helen, 2016, The Ethics of Pregnancy, Abortion, and Childbirth: Exploring Moral Choices in Childbearing, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Weber, Andrea, Benjamin Miskle, Alison Lynch, Stephan Arndt, and
Laura Acion, 2021, “Substance Use in Pregnancy: Identifying
Stigma and Improving Care”, Substance Abuse and
Rehabilitation, 12: 105–21. (Scholar)
- Weijer, Charles, 1998, “Commentary: self interest is not the
sole legitimate basis for making decisions”, British Medical
Journal, 316: 850. (Scholar)
- White, Amina, 2015, “Accelerating the paradigm shift toward
inclusion of pregnant women in drug research: ethical and regulatory
considerations”, Seminars in Perinatology, 39(7):
537–40. (Scholar)
- White, Jamie, and Janine Clayton, “The Gender Health
Innovation Gap: A Perspective from the NIH Office of Research on
Women’s Health”, Med, 3(5): 298–301. (Scholar)
- Woodruff, Teresa K., Green, Sharon, Paller, Amy, Schlosser,
Bethanee J., Spring, Bonnie, Castle, Megan, Stock, M. Christine et
al., 2015, “Sex-based biomedical research policy needs an
implementation plan”, Women’s Health, 11:
449–52. (Scholar)
- Woollard, Fiona, 2018, “Motherhood and Mistakes about Defeasible Duties to Benefit”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 97(1): 126–49. (Scholar)
- Young, Iris Marion, 1994, “Punishment, treatment, empowerment: three approaches to policy for pregnant addicts”, Feminist Studies, 20(1): 33–57. (Scholar)
- Zalpuri, Isheeta, Byatt, Nancy, Gramann, Stacey, Dresner, Nehama,
and Brendel, Rebecca, 2015, “Decisional capacity in pregnancy: a
complex case of pregnancy termination”, Psychosomatics,
56(3): 292–7. (Scholar)