Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Eugenics" by Inmaculada de Melo-Martin and Sara Goering
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Agar, Nicholas, 2004, Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement, Oxford UK: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Anomaly, Jonathan, 2020. Creating Future People: The Ethics of Genetic Enhancement, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Amundson, Ron, 2005, “Disability, Ideology and Quality of Life: A Bias in Biomedical Ethics”, in Wasserman, Bickenbach, and Wachbroit (eds), 101–124. (Scholar)
- Asch, Adrienne, 1999, “Prenatal Diagnosis
and Selective Abortion: A Challenge to Practice and
Policy”, American Journal of Public Health, 89(11):
1649–57. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, “Why I Haven’t
Changed My Mind about Prenatal Diagnosis”, in Parens and Asch
(eds), 234–358. (Scholar)
- Asch, Adrienne and Erik Parens, 2000, “The
Disability Rights Critque of Prenatal Genetic Testing: Reflections and
Recommendations”, in Parens and Asch 2000: 3–43. (Scholar)
- Asch, Adrienne and David Wasserman, 2005,
“Where is the Sin in Synecdoche? Prenatal Testing and the
Parent-Child Relationship”, in Wasserman, Bickenbach, and
Wachbroit 2005: 172–216. (Scholar)
- Blakeley Claire, Debbie M Smith, Edward D Johnstone, Anja Wittkowski, 2019, “Parental Decision-Making Following a Prenatal Diagnosis That Is Lethal, Life-Limiting, or Has Long Term Implications for the Future Child and Family: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Literature”, BMC Med Ethics, 20(1):56. (Scholar)
- Baily, Mary Ann, 2000, “Why I Had
Amniocentesis”, in Parens and Asch (eds), 64–71. (Scholar)
- Barnes, Elizabeth, 2016, The Minority Body: a Theory of Disability, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Bauman, H-Dirksen L, and Joseph J. Murray, 2014,
Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity,
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
- Bayles, Michael, 1984, Reproductive Ethics, Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall. (Scholar)
- Benjamin, Ruha, 2019, Race after Technology:
Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code, Cambridge: Polity. (Scholar)
- Bennett, Rebecca, 2008, “The Fallacy of the Principle of Procreative Beneficence”, Bioethics, 23(5): 265–273. (Scholar)
- Berube, Michael, 1998, Life as We Know
It: A Father, a Family, and an Exceptional Child, Vintage
Books. (Scholar)
- Boorse, Christopher, 1975, “On the Distinction between Disease and Illness”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 5: 49–68. (Scholar)
- Bostrom, Nick and Toby Ord, 2006, “The Reversal Test: Eliminating Status Quo Bias in Applied Ethics”, Ethics, 116: 656–679. (Scholar)
- Buchanan, Allen, 1996, “Choosing Who Will Be Disabled: Genetic Intervention and the Morality of Inclusion”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 13: 18–45. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, “Institutions, Beliefs, and Ethics: Eugenics as a Case Study”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 15(1): 22–45. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, Better than Human: The Promise and Perils of Enhancing Ourselves, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Buchanan, Allen, Dan Brock, Norman Daniels, and
Dan Wikler, 2000, From Chance to Choice, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Campbell, Stephen and Joseph Stramondo, 2017, “The Complicated Relationship of Disability and Well-Being” Kennedy Institute for Ethics Journal 27(2): 151–184. (Scholar)
- Caplan, Arthur, 2004, “What’s Morally Wrong
with Eugenics?”, in Health, Disease and Illness:
Concepts in Medicine, Arthur L. Caplan, James J. McCartney, and
Dominic A. Sisti (eds), Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. (Scholar)
- Clarke, Angus, 2017, “The Evolving Concept
of Non-Directiveness in Genetic Counselling”, in History of
Human Genetics: Aspects of Its Development and Global,
Heike I. Petermann, Peter S. Harper, and Susanne Doetz
(eds), 541–66, New York, NY: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. (Scholar)
- Daniels, Norman, 1994, “The Human Genome
Project, Individual Differences, and Just Health Care”,
in Justice and the Human Genome Project, Timothy F.
Murphy and Marc A. Lappé (eds), 110–32, Berkeley:
University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Daar, Judith. 2018. The New Eugenics: Selective Breeding in an Era of Reproductive Technologies. New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
- Davis, Dena, 2010, Genetic Dilemmas:
Reproductive Technology, Parental Choices, and Children’s Futures,
2nd edition New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada, 2004, “On Our Obligation to Select the Best Children: A Reply to Savulescu”, Bioethics, 18(1): 72–83. (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, Rethinking Reprogenetics: Enhancing Ethical Analyses of Reprogenetic Technologies, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2018, “The Trouble with Moral Enhancement”, in (Eds.), Moral Enhancement: Critical perspectives – Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, Michael Hauskeller and Lewis Coyne (eds). 19–33, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- DesAutels, Peggy, Margaret Battin and Larry May, 1999, Praying for a Cure: When Medical and Religious Practices Conflict, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. (Scholar)
- Dietz, Elizabeth and Joel Michael Reynolds, 2022, “Reforming Informed Consent: On Disability and Genetic Counseling,” in The Oxford Handbook of Genetic Counseling, Michael Deem, Robin Grubs, and Emily Farrow, (eds), New York: Oxford University Press, Forthcoming, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3819367. (Scholar)
- Dresser, Rebecca, 1996, “Long Term Contraceptives in the Criminal Justice System”, in Coerced Contraception? Moral and Policy Challenges of Long Acting Birth Control, Ellen H. Moskowitz and Bruce Jennings (eds), Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. (Scholar)
- Douglas, Thomas, 2008, “Moral Enhancement”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 25: 228–45. (Scholar)
- Duster, Troy, 1990, Backdoor to
Eugenics, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Dyck Erika. 2014. “History of
Eugenics Revisited”, Can Bull Med Hist, 31(1):7–16. (Scholar)
- Edwards, Steven D., 2004, “Disability,
Identity, and the ‘Expressivist’
Objection”, Journal of Medical Ethics, 30:
418–420. (Scholar)
- Elster, Jakob, 2011, “Procreative Beneficence – Cui Bono?”, Bioethics, 25(9): 482–88. (Scholar)
- Estreich, George, 2011, The Shape of the
Eye: Down Syndrome, Family, and the Stories We Inherit, Southern
Methodist University Press. (Scholar)
- Feinberg, Joel, 1980, “The Child’s Right to
an Open Future”, in Whose Child? Children’s Rights,
Parental Authority, and State Power, William Aiken and Hugh La
Follette (eds), 124–53, Totowa NJ: Littlefield. (Scholar)
- Fukuyama, Francis, 2003, Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution, London: Profile Books. (Scholar)
- Galton, Francis, 1973; first
1883, Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development,
New York: AMS Press. (Scholar)
- Garland Thomson, Rosemarie, 2012, “The Case for Conserving Disability”, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 9: 339–355. (Scholar)
- Glover, Jonathan, 2006, Choosing Children: Genes, Disability and Design, Oxford UK: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Goering, Sara, 2000, “Gene Therapies and the Pursuit of a Better Human”, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 9(3): 330–341. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, “‘You say
you’re happy, but…’: Contested Quality of Life Judgments
in Bioethics and Disability Studies”, Journal of
Bioethical Inquiry, 5: 125–135. (Scholar)
- Green, Ronald, 2007, Babies by Design:
The Ethics of Genetic Choice, New Haven CT: Yale University
Press. (Scholar)
- Gunner Broberg and Nils
Roll-Hansen, eds., 2005, Eugenics and the Welfare State: Norway,
Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. East Lansing, Mich.: Michigan State
University Press. (Scholar)
- Habermas, Jurgen, 2003, The Future of Human Nature, Cambridge UK: Polity. (Scholar)
- Harris, John, 2000, “Is There a Coherent Social Conception of Disability”, Journal of Medical Ethics, 26: 95–100. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “Moral Enhancement and Freedom”, Bioethics, 21: 102–11. (Scholar)
- Hayry, Matti, 2010, Rationality and the Genetic Challenge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Herissone-Kelly, Peter, 2007, “The ‘parental
love’ objection to nonmedical sex selection: deepening the
argument”, Cambridge Quarterly Healthcare Ethics, 16
(4):446–55. (Scholar)
- Holm, Soren, 2007, “The Expressivist
Objection to Prenatal Testing: Can We Lay it to
Rest?”, Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(1):
24–25. (Scholar)
- Kabasenche, William, 2013, “Moral Enhancement Worth Having: Thinking Holistically”, AJOB Neuroscience, 3(4): 18–20. (Scholar)
- Kamm, Frances, 2005, “Is There a Problem with Enhancement?”, American Journal of Bioethics, 5(3): 5–14. (Scholar)
- Kaposy, Chris, 2018, Choosing Down Syndrome:
Ethics and New Prenatal Testing Technologies, Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press. (Scholar)
- Kass, Leon, 2003, Beyond Therapy:
Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness, Report from the
President’s Council on Bioethics.
[Kass 2003 available online] (Scholar)
- Katz Rothman, Barbara, 1986, The
Tentative Pregnancy: How Amniocentesis Changes the Experience of
Motherhood, New York: Norton & Co. (Scholar)
- Kevles, Daniel, 1985, In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Kittay, Eva, 1999, Love’s Labor: Essays
on Women, Equality and Dependency, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Kittay, Eva with Leo Kittay, 2000, “On the
Expressivity and Ethics of Selective Abortion for Disability:
Conversations with My Son”, in Parens and Asch 2000:
165–195. (Scholar)
- Kirksey, Eben, 2021, The Mutant Project: Inside the Global Race to
Genetically Modify Humans. New York: St. Martin’s
Press. (Scholar)
- Klein, David Alan, 2011, “Medical
Disparagement of the Disability Experience: Empirical Evidence for the
Expressivist Objection”, AJOB Primary Research, 2:
8–20. (Scholar)
- Kline, Wendy. Building a Better Race: Gender,
Sexuality, and Eugenics from the Turn of the Century to the
Baby-Boom. Berkley: University of California Press, 2001.
- Kluchin RM. 2009.
Fit to be Tied: Sterilization and Reproductive Rights in America,
1950–1980. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. (Scholar)
- Koch, Tom, 2011, “Eugenics and the Genetic Challenge, Again: All Dressed Up and Just Everywhere to Go”, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 20: 191–203. (Scholar)
- Kukla, Rebecca, 2008, “Measuring Mothering”, International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 1(1): 67–90. (Scholar)
- Lane, Harlan and Michael Grodin, 1997, “Ethical Issues in Cochlear Implant Surgery: An Exploration into Disease, Disability and the Best Interests of the Child”, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 7(3): 231–52. (Scholar)
- Levin, Susan, 2021, Posthuman Bliss? The Failed Promise of Transhumanism, New York: Oxford University. (Scholar)
- Lifton, Robert Jay, 1986, The Nazi
Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide, New York:
Basic Books. (Scholar)
- Lombardo, Paul, 2008, Three Generations, No
Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
- MacLaren, Angus, 1990, Our Own Master Race:
Eugenics in Canada, 1885–1945. Toronto: McClelland and
Stewart. (Scholar)
- Malmqvist, Erik, 2011, “Reprogenetics and
the ‘Parents Have Always Done it’
Argument”, Hastings Center Report, 41(1):
43–49. (Scholar)
- McMahan, Jeff, 2005, “Preventing the
Existence of People with Disabilities”, in Wasserman, Bickenbach,
and Wachbroit 2005: 142–171. (Scholar)
- Miller, Steven Paul, 2006, “Toward Truly
Informed Decisions about Appearance-Shaping Surgeries”,
in Surgically Shaping Children, 211–226, Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
- Mundy, Liz, 2002, “A World of Their
Own”, Washington Post, March 31, p. W22. (Scholar)
- Munsterhjelm, Mark, 2011, “‘Unfit for Life’: A Case Study of Protector-Protected Analogies in Recent Advocacy of Eugenics and Coercive Genetic Discrimination”, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 8: 177–189. (Scholar)
- Nelson, James Lindemann, 2000, “The Meaning of the Act: Reflections on the Expressive Force of Reproductive Decision Making and Policies”, in Parens and Asch 2000: 196–213. (Scholar)
- Nordmann, Alfred, 2007, “If and Then: A Critique of Speculative NanoEthics”, NanoEthics, 1 (1): 31–46. (Scholar)
- Nozick, Robert, 1974, Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
- Oliver, Kelly, 2010, “Enhancing Evolution: Whose Body? Whose Choice?”, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 48: 74–96. (Scholar)
- Parens, Erik, 1998a, “Is Better Always
Good?”, in Parens 1998b: 1–28. (Scholar)
- Parens, Erik (ed.), 1998b, Enhancing
Human Traits, Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. (Scholar)
- Parens, Erik and Adrienne Asch (eds), 2000, Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. (Scholar)
- Parker, Michael, 2007, “The Best Possible Child”, Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(5): 279–283. (Scholar)
- Paul, Diane B, Stenhouse, John, and Spencer,
Hamish G, (eds), 2018. Eugenics at the Edges of Empire: New
Zealand, Australia, Canada, and South Africa. Cham: Palgrave
Macmillan. (Scholar)
- Persson, Ingmar and Julian Savulescu, 2008, “The Perils of Cognitive Enhancement and the Urgent Imperative to Enhance the Moral Character of Humanity”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 25: 162–76. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement, Oxford UK: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Press, Nancy, 2000, “Assessing the
Expressive Character of Prenatal Testing: The Choices Made, or the
Choices Made Available”, in Parens and Asch 2000:
214–233. (Scholar)
- Rapp, Rayna, 1999, Testing Women, Testing
the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America, New
York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Roberts, Dorothy E. 1997. Killing the Black
Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty. New York:
Pantheon Books. (Scholar)
- Robertson, John A. 1994. Children of Choice:
Freedom and The New Reproductive Technologies, Princeton:
Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Rogers, Wendy, Angela Ballantyne, and Heather Draper, 2007, “Is Sex-Selective Abortion Morally Justified and Should It Be Permitted?”, Bioethics, 21(9): 520–524. (Scholar)
- Rothschild, Joan, 2005, The Dream of the
Perfect Child, Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
- Russell, Camisha, 2010, “The Limits of Liberal Choice: Racial Selection and Reprogenetics”, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 48: 97–108. (Scholar)
- Sandel, Michael, 2007, The Case Against
Perfection, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Savulescu, Julian, 2001, “Procreative Beneficence: Why We Should Select the Best Children”, Bioethics, 15(5): 413–426. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, “New Breeds of
Humans: The Moral Obligation to Enhance”, Reproductive
Biomedicine Online.10 Suppl 1:36–9. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, “In Defence of Procreative Beneficence”, Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(5): 284–88. (Scholar)
- Savulescu, Julian and Guy Kahane, 2009, “The Moral Obligation to Create Children with the Best Chance of the Best Life”, Bioethics, 23(5): 274–290. (Scholar)
- Saxton, Marsha, 2000, “Why Members of the
Disability Community Oppose Prenatal Diagnosis and Selective
Abortion”, in Parens and Asch 2000: 147–164. (Scholar)
- Schroeder, Andrew, 2018, “Well-Being, Opportunity and Selecting for Disability” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 14(1): 1–27. (Scholar)
- Shakespeare, Tom, 2006, Disability Rights
and Wrongs, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Silver, Lee, 1997, Remaking Eden:
Cloning, Genetic Engineering, and the Future of Human Kind,
London: Phoenix. (Scholar)
- Silvers, Anita, 1998, “A Fatal Attraction to
Normalizing: Treating Disabilities as Deviations from
‘Species-Typical’ Functioning”, in Parens 1998b:
95–123. (Scholar)
- Silvers, Anita, David Wasserman, and Mary B.
Mahowald, 1998, Disability, Difference and Discrimination:
Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy, Lanham,
MD: Rowman & Littlefield. (Scholar)
- Simkulet, William, 2013, “On Moral Enhancement”, AJOB Neuroscience, 3(4): 17–18. (Scholar)
- Sparrow, Robert, 2005, “Defending Deaf Culture”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 13(2): 135–152. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, Procreative Beneficence, Obligation, and Eugenics. Genomics, Society and Policy 3(3): 43–59. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011a, “A Not-So-New Eugenics: Harris and Savulescu on Human Enhancement”, Hastings Center Report, 41(1): 32–42. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011b, “Liberalism and Eugenics”, Australian Journal of Political Philosophy, 89(3): 499–517. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, Human Enhancement and Sexual Dimorphism. Bioethics, 26(9):464–75. (Scholar)
- Spriggs, Merle, 2002, “Lesbian Couple Create a Child Who is Deaf Like Them”, Journal of Medical Ethics, 28: 283. (Scholar)
- Stern, Alexandra, 2002, “Making Better
Babies: Public Health and Race Betterment in Indiana,
1920–1935”, American Journal of Public
Health, 92: 742–752. (Scholar)
- –––, 2015. Eugenic Nation:
Faults and Frontiers of Better Breeding in Modern America,
2nd edition. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Stramondo, Joseph, 2021, “Bioethics, Adaptive Preference, and Judging the Quality of Life with a Disability”, Social Theory and Practice, 47 (1):199–220. (Scholar)
- Stubblefield, Anna, 2007, “‘Beyond the Pale’: Tainted Whiteness, Cognitive Disability, and Eugenic Sterilization”, Hypatia, 22(2): 162–181. (Scholar)
- Tremain, Shelley, 2006, “Reproductive Freedom, Self-Regulation, and the Government of Impairment in Utero”, Hypatia, 21(1): 35–53. (Scholar)
- Trommelmans, Leen, 2006, “Review
of Liberal Eugenics”, Ethical
Perspectives, 13(2): 321–323. (Scholar)
- Valentine, Desiree, 2021, “Technologies of Reproduction: Race, disability and neoliberal eugenics”, Journal of Philosophy of Disability, 1:35–55. (Scholar)
- Warren, Mary Anne, 1985, Gendercide: Implications of Sex Selection, Totowa NJ: Rowman & Allanfield Publishers. (Scholar)
- Wasserman, David, Jerome Bickenbach, and Robert Wachbroit (eds), 2005, Quality of Life and Human Difference: Genetic Testing, Health Care, and Disability, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Wendell, Susan, 1996, The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Wilson, R. 2018. The Eugenic Mind Project. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Zarpentine, Chris, 2013, “‘The Thorny and Arduous Path of Moral Progress’: Moral Psychology and Moral Enhancement”, Neuroethics, 6(1): 141–153. (Scholar)