Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Fallacies" by Hans Hansen

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Aberdein, A., 2013, “Fallacy and argumentational vice,” Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA Conference Archive: OSSA 10), available online. (Scholar)
–––, 2016, “The vices of argument,” Topoi, 25: 413–22. (Scholar)
Akin, S.F., and J. Casey, 2022a, Straw Man Arguments: A Study in Fallacy Theory, London: Bloomsbury. (Scholar)
–––, 2022b, “Bothsiderism,” Argumentation, 36: 249–68. (Scholar)
–––, 2023, “Free speech fallacies as meta-argumentative errors,” Argumentation, 37: 295–305. (Scholar)
Aristotle, Categories, H.P. Cooke (trans.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1938.
–––, On Sophistical Refutations, E. S. Forster (trans.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1955.
–––, Posterior Analytics, H. Tredennick (trans.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960.
–––, Topics, Books I and VIII, R. Smith (trans.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.
Arnauld, A., and P. Nicole, 1685, Logic, or the Art of Thinking, 5^th edition, J. V. Buroker (trans.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. (Scholar)
Bachman, J., 1995, “Appeal to authority,” in Hansen and Pinto, 1995, pp. 274–86. (Scholar)
Bacon, F., 1620, The New Organon, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1960. (Scholar)
Barth, E. M., and J. L. Martens, 1977, “Argumentum ad hominem, from chaos to formal dialectic,” Logique et Analyse, 20: 76–96. (Scholar)
Bentham, J., 1824, The Handbook of Political Fallacies, page references to reprint, H. A. Larrabee (ed.), New York: Harper and Brothers, 1962. (Scholar)
Biro, J., 1977, “Rescuing ‘begging the question’,” Metaphilosophy, 8: 257–71. (Scholar)
Biro, J., and H. Siegel, 1992, “Normativity, argumentation and an epistemic theory of fallacies,” in Frans H. van Eemeren, et al., editors, Argumentation Illuminated, Amsterdam: Sic Sat, pp. 85–103. (Scholar)
–––, 1997, “Epistemic normativity, argumentation and fallacies,” Argumentation, 11: 277–293. (Scholar)
–––, 2006, “In defence of the objective epistemic approach to argumentation,” Informal Logic, 26: 91–102. (Scholar)
Blair, J. A., 1995, “The place of teaching informal fallacies in teaching reasoning skills or critical thinking,” in Hansen and Pinto 1995, pp. 328–38. (Scholar)
–––, 2023, “Teaching the fallacies,” Argumentation, 37: 247–251. (Scholar)
Brinton, A., 1995, “The ad hominem,” in Hansen and Pinto 1995, pp. 213–22. (Scholar)
Churchill, R. P., 1986, Becoming Logical, New York: St Martin’s Press. (Scholar)
Cohen, D.H., 2009, “Keeping an open mind and having a sense of proportion as virtues in argumentation,” Cogency, 1: 49–64. (Scholar)
Copi, I. M., 1961, Introduction to Logic, (2^nd ed.), New York: Macmillan. (Scholar)
Corcoran, J., 1974, “Remarks on Stoic deduction,” in J. Corcoran (ed.), Ancient Logic and its Modern Interpretations, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 169–81. (Scholar)
Corner, A., U. Hahn, and M. Oaksford, 2006, “The slippery slope argument—probability, utility and category reappraisal,” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 28: 1145–1150, available online. (Scholar)
Correia, V., 2011, “Biases and fallacies: The role of motivated irrationality in fallacious reasoning,” Cogency, 3: 107–26. (Scholar)
Finocchiaro, M. A., 1974, “The concept of ad hominem argument in Galileo and Locke,” Philosophical Forum, 5: 394–404; page references are to Finocchiaro 2005, pp. 329–39. (Scholar)
–––, 1981, “Fallacies and the evaluation of reasoning,” American Philosophical Quarterly 18: 13–22; page references are to Finocchiaro 2005, pp. 109–27. (Scholar)
–––, 1987, “Six types of fallaciousness: towards a realistic theory of logical criticism,” Argumentation 1: 263–82; page references are to Finocchiaro 2005, pp. 128–47. (Scholar)
–––, 2005, Arguments about Arguments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2023, The Fallacy of Composition: Critical Reviews, ConceptualAanalyses, and Case Studies, London: College Publications. (Scholar)
Freeman, J. B., 1988, Thinking Logically: Basic Concepts for Reasoning, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
–––, 1995, “The appeal to popularity and presumption by common knowledge,” in Hansen and Pinto 1995, pp. 265–73. (Scholar)
Goodwin, J., 1998, “Forms of authority,” Argumentation, 12: 267–80. (Scholar)
Govier, T., 1982, “What’s wrong with slippery slope fallacies?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 12: 303–16. (Scholar)
–––, 1987, “Four reasons there are no fallacies?” in Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation, Dordrecht: Foris; page references to reprint as “Reply to Massey” in Hansen and Pinto 1995, pp. 172–80. (Scholar)
–––, 1988, A Practical Study of Argument, 2nd edition, Belmont: Wadsworth. (Scholar)
Grootendorst, R., 1997, “Jeremy Bentham’s Handbook of Political Fallacies ,” in Historical Foundations of Informal Logic, D. Walton and A. Brinton (eds.), Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 114–24. (Scholar)
Hahn, U., and M. Oaksford, 2006a, “A normative theory of argument strength,” Informal Logic, 26: 1–24.
–––, 2006b, “A Bayesian approach to informal argument fallacies,” Synthese, 152: 207–236. (Scholar)
Hamblin, C. L., 1970, Fallacies, London: Methuen. (Scholar)
Hansen, H. V., 2002, “The straw thing of fallacy theory: the standard definition of ‘fallacy’,” Argumentation, 16: 134–55. (Scholar)
–––, 2023, “Committing fallacies and the appearance condition,” Argumentation, 37: 253–267. (Scholar)
–––, and R. C. Pinto (eds.), 1995, Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, University Park: Penn State Press. (Scholar)
Hintikka, J., 1987, “The fallacy of fallacies,” Argumentation, 1: 211–38. (Scholar)
–––, 1997, “What was Aristotle doing in his early logic, anyway? A reply to Woods and Hansen,” Synthese, 113: 241–49. (Scholar)
Hitchcock, D., 1995, “Do fallacies have a place in the teaching of reasoning skills or critical thinking?” in Hansen and Pinto 1995, pp. 319–27. (Scholar)
–––, 2000, “Fallacies and formal logic in Aristotle,” History and Philosophy of Logic, 21: 2017–21. (Scholar)
–––, 2023. “Textbook treatments of fallacies,” Argumentation, 37: 233–245. (Scholar)
Irwin, T., and G. Fine, 1996, Aristotle, Introductory Readings, Indianapolis: Hackett. (Scholar)
–––, 1987, “The blaze of her splendors: Suggestions about revitalizing fallacy theory,” Argumentation, 1: 239–53; page references to reprint in Hansen and Pinto 1995, pp. 107–19. (Scholar)
Johnson, R., and J. A. Blair, 1993, Logical Self-Defence, 3^rd ed., Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson. (Scholar)
Johnstone, H. W., Jr., 1952, “Philosophy and argumentum ad hominem,” Journal of Philosophy, 49: 489–98. (Scholar)
Kahane, H., 1971, Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric, Belmont: Wadsworth. (Scholar)
Korb, K., 2003, “Bayesian informal logic and fallacy,” Informal Logic, 23: 41–70. (Scholar)
Krabbe, E. C. W., 1995, “Appeal to ignorance,” in Hansen and Pinto 1995, pp. 251–64. (Scholar)
Locke, J., 1690, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Many editions. (Scholar)
Lorenzen, P., 1969, Normative Logic and Ethics, Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut; 2nd annotated edition, 1984. (Scholar)
Massey, G. J., 1981, “The fallacy behind fallacies,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 6: 489–500; page references are to reprint in Hansen and Pinto 1995, pp. 159–71. (Scholar)
Mates, B., 1965, Elementary Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Mill, J. S., 1891, A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, 8^th edition, New York: Harper and Brothers; first edition 1843. (Scholar)
Nickerson, R.S., 2021, Argumentation: The Art of Persuasion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Nuchelmans, G., 1993, “On the fourfold root of argumentum ad hominem,” in E. C. W. Krabbe, R. J. Dalitz, and P. A. Smit (eds.), Empirical Logic and Public Debate, Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 37–47. (Scholar)
Oswald, S., and T. Herman, 2020, “Give the standard treatment of fallacies a chance! Cognitive and rhetorical insights into fallacy processing,” in F.H. van Eemeren and B. Garssen (eds.), From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild, Cham: Springer, pp. 41–62. (Scholar)
Pinto, R. C., 1995, Post hoc, ergo propter hoc, in Hansen and Pinto, pp. 302–11. (Scholar)
Powers, L., 1995, “Equivocation,” in Hansen and Pinto 1995, pp. 287–301. (Scholar)
Rosen, F., 2006, “The philosophy of error and liberty of thought: J. S. Mill on logical fallacies,” Informal Logic, 26: 121–47. (Scholar)
Rudanko, J., 2021, Fallacies and Free Speech, New York: Palgrave MacMillan. (Scholar)
Salmon, W., 1963, Logic, Englewood-Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
Schreiber, S. G., 2003, Aristotle on False Reasoning, Albany: State University of New York Press. (Scholar)
Sidgwick, A., 1878, “The negative character of logic,” Mind, 3: 350–357. (Scholar)
––, 1884, Fallacies: A View of Logic from the Practical Side, New York: D. Appleton and Co.
Smith, R., 1997, “Commentary,” Aristotle: Topics, Books I and VIII, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
Thagard, P., 2011, “Critical thinking and informal logic: neuropsychological perspectives,” Informal Logic, 31: 152–70. (Scholar)
Tindale, C. W., 1996, “Fallacies in transition: An assessment of the Pragma-dialectical perspective,” Informal Logic, 18: 17–33. (Scholar)
–––, 2007, “On Fallacy,” in Reason Reclaimed: Essays in Honor of J. Anthony Blair and Ralph H. Johnson, H.V. Hansen and R. C. Pinto (eds.), Newport News: Vale Press, pp. 155–70. (Scholar)
Van Eemeren, F. H., 2010, Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Scholar)
–––, and Rob Grootendorst, 1984, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions, Dordrecht: Foris. (Scholar)
–––, 1992, Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies, Hillsdale: Erlbaum. (Scholar)
–––, 2004, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
___, 2018, Argumentation Theory: A Practical Dialectical Perspective, Cham: Springer.
Walton, D. N., 1991, Begging the Question, New York: Greenwood. (Scholar)
–––, 1995, A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacies, Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1998, Ad hominem arguments, Tuscaloosa, University of Alabama Press.
–––, 2010, “Why fallacies appear to be better arguments than they are,” Informal Logic, 30: 159–84. (Scholar)
–––, 2011, “Defeasible reasoning and informal fallacies,” Synthese, 179: 377–407. (Scholar)
Watts, I., 1796, Logick: or, the Right Use of Reason, 2^nd edition; page references to reprint, New York: Garland, 1984. (Scholar)
Whately, R., 1875, Elements of Logic, 9^th ed., London: Longmans, Green and Company; first edition 1826. (Scholar)
Woods, J., 1992, “Who cares about the fallacies?” in Argumentation Illuminated, F. H. van Eemeren, et al. (eds.), Amsterdam: SicSat, pp. 23–48. (Scholar)
–––, 2013, Errors of Reasoning: Naturalizing the Logic of Inference, London: College Publications. (Scholar)
–––, and H. V. Hansen, 1997, “Hintikka on Aristotle’s fallacies,” Synthese, 113: 217–39. (Scholar)
–––, 2001, “The subtleties of Aristotle on non-cause,” Logique et analyse, 176: 395–415. (Scholar)
Woods, J., and D. N. Walton, 1989, Fallacies: Selected Papers, 1972–1982, Dordrecht: Foris. (Scholar)
Wreen, M., 1989, “A bolt of fear,” Philosophy and Rhetoric, 22: 131–40.

Generated Sun Mar 23 14:02:22 2025

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...