Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science" by Elizabeth Anderson

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Addelson, Kathryn, 1983, “The Man of Professional Wisdom,” in Harding and Hintikka 1983. (Scholar)
Alcoff, Linda, 2001, “On Judging Epistemic Credibility: Is Social Identity Relevant?,” in Engendering Rationalities, N. Tuana and S. Morgan (eds.), Albany: SUNY Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2010, “Epistemic Identities,” Episteme, 7: 128–37. (Scholar)
–––, and Elizabeth Potter (eds.) 1993, Feminist Epistemologies, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
Anderson, Elizabeth, 1995a, “Feminist Epistemology: An Interpretation and Defense,” Hypatia, 10: 50–84. (Scholar)
–––, 1995b, “Knowledge, Human Interests, and Objectivity in Feminist Epistemology,” Philosophical Topics, 23: 27–58. (Scholar)
–––, 2004, “Uses of Value Judgments in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce,” Hypatia, 19(1): 1–24. (Scholar)
–––, 2012, “Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions,” Social Epistemology, 26(2): 163–173. (Scholar)
Antony, Louise, 1993, “Quine as Feminist: The Radical Import of Naturalized Epistemology,” in Antony and Witt 1993. (Scholar)
Antony, Louise, and Charlotte Witt (eds.), 1993 [2002], A Mind of One’s Own, Boulder: Westview Press, 1993; 2nd edition, 2002. (Scholar)
Baber, Harriet, 1994, “The Market for Feminist Epistemology,” Monist, 77(4): 403–423. (Scholar)
Bailey, Alison, 2007, “Strategic Ignorance,” in Sullivan and Tuana 2007. (Scholar)
Belenky, Mary Field, et al, 1986, Women’s Ways of Knowing, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
Bem, Sandra, 1993, The Lenses of Gender, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
Benhabib, Seyla, 1995, “Feminism and Postmodernism,” in Feminist Contentions, Benhabib, Seyla, Judith Butler, Drucilla Cornell and Nancy Fraser (eds.), New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
Bergin, Lisa, 2002, “Testimony, epistemic difference, and privilege: how feminist epistemology can improve our understanding of the communication of knowledge,” Social Epistemology, 16: 197–213. (Scholar)
Bleier, Ruth, 1984, Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and its Theories on Women, New York: Pergamon. (Scholar)
Bluhm, Robyn, 2013, “Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: The Influence of Gender Stereotypes on Functional Neuroimaging Research on Emotion,” Hypatia, 28(4): 870–886. (Scholar)
Bordo, Susan, 1987, The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture, Albany: State University of New York Press. (Scholar)
Butler, Judith, 1990, Gender Trouble, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
–––, 1993, Bodies that Matter, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
Campbell, Richmond, 1998, Illusions of Paradox, Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield. (Scholar)
Clayton, Susan and Faye Crosby, 1992, Justice, Gender, and Affirmative Action, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. (Scholar)
Clough, Sharyn, 2003, Beyond Epistemology: A Pragmatist Approach to Feminist Science Studies, Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield. (Scholar)
Code, Lorraine, 1991, What Can She Know?, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
Collins, Patricia Hill, 1990, Black Feminist Thought, Boston: Unwin Hyman. (Scholar)
–––, 1996, “Comment on Hekman’s ‘Truth and Method’: Where’s the Power?,” Signs, 22: 375–381. (Scholar)
Crenshaw, Kimberlé, 1989, “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex,” University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–167. (Scholar)
Daukas, Nancy, 2011, “Altogether Now: A Virtue-Theoretic Approach to Pluralism in Feminist Epistemology,” in Grasswick. (Scholar)
–––, 2018, “Feminist Virtue Epistemology,” in The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, Abingdon: Routledge. (Scholar)
Dotson, Kristie, 2011, “Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing,” Hypatia, 26(2): 236–257. (Scholar)
–––, 2012, “A Cautionary Tale: On Limiting Epistemic Oppression,” Frontiers, 33(1): 24–47. (Scholar)
Duran, Jane, 1991, Toward a Feminist Epistemology, Savage, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield. (Scholar)
Eichler, Margrit, 1988, Nonsexist Research Methods: A Practical Guide, Winchester, Mass.: Allen & Unwin. (Scholar)
Fine, Cordelia, 2010, Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference, New York: Norton. (Scholar)
Flax, Jane, 1983, “Political Philosophy and the Patriarchal Unconscious,” in Harding and Hintikka 1983. (Scholar)
–––, 1990, “Postmodernism and Gender Relations in Feminist Theory,” in Nicholson. (Scholar)
Fraser, Nancy and Linda Nicholson, 1990, “Social Criticism without Philosophy,” in Nicholson 1990. (Scholar)
Fricker, Miranda, 2007, Epistemic Injustice, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Garry, Ann, and Marilyn Pearsall (eds.) 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality, Boston: Unwin Hyman. (Scholar)
Gilligan, Carol, 1982, In a Different Voice, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Grasswick, Heidi (ed.) 2011, Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science: Power in Knowledge, Dordrecht: Springer (Scholar)
Greaves, Lorraine, Wylie, Alison and the Staff of the Battered Women’s Advocacy Center, 1995, “Women and Violence: Feminist Practice and Quantitative Method,” in Changing Methods, Sandra Burt and Lorraine Code (eds.), Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press. (Scholar)
Gross, Paul and Levitt, Norman, 1994, Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and its Quarrels with Science, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins. (Scholar)
Haack, Susan, 1993, “Epistemological Reflections of an Old Feminist,” Reason Papers, 18: 31–42. Reprinted as “Knowledge and Propaganda,” in Pinnick, Koertge and Almeder, 2003. (Scholar)
Haraway, Donna, 1989, Primate Visions, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
–––, 1991, “Situated Knowledges,” In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
Harding, Sandra, 1986, The Science Question in Feminism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
––– (ed.), 1987a, Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1987b, “Is There a Feminist Method?,” in Harding 1987a. (Scholar)
–––, 1991, Whose science? Whose knowledge?, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1993, “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: ‘What is Strong Objectivity?,’” in Alcoff and Potter 1993. (Scholar)
–––, 1996, “Comment on Hekman’s ‘Truth and Method’: Whose Standpoint Needs the Regimes of Truth and Reality?,” Signs, 22: 382–391. (Scholar)
–––, 1998, Is Science Multicultural?: Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies, Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2008, Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities, Durham: Duke University Press. (Scholar)
–––, and Merrill Hintikka (eds.), 1983, Discovering Reality, Dordrecht: D. Reidel; Boston: Kluwer. (Scholar)
–––, and Jean O’Barr (eds.), 1987, Sex and Scientific Inquiry, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Hare-Mustin, Rachel and Jeanne Maracek, 1994, “Gender and the Meaning of Difference: Postmodernism and Psychology,” In Theorizing Feminism, Anne Herrmann and Abigail Stewart (eds.), Boulder, Col.: Westview. (Scholar)
Hartsock, Nancy, 1987, “The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism,” In Harding 1987a. (Scholar)
–––, 1996, “Comment on Hekman’s ‘Truth and Method’: Truth or Justice,” Signs, 22: 367–73. (Scholar)
Haslanger, Sally, 1993, “On Being Objective and Being Objectified,” in Antony and Witt 1993. (Scholar)
–––, 1995, “Ontology and Social Construction,” Philosophical Topics, 23: 95–125. (Scholar)
–––, 2000, “Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them To Be?,” Noûs, 34(1): 31–55. (Scholar)
Hays-Gilpin, Kelley; Whitley, David (eds.), 1998, Reader in Gender Archaeology, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
Hekman, Susan, 1996, “Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited,” Signs, 22: 341–365. (Scholar)
Hicks, Daniel, 2011, “Is Longino’s Conception of Objectivity Feminist?,” Hypatia, 26(2): 333–351. (Scholar)
Hookway, Christopher, 2010, “Some Varieties of Epistemic Injustice: Reflections on Fricker,” Episteme, 7: 151–63. (Scholar)
Hrdy, Sarah, 1981, The Woman that Never Evolved, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Hundleby, Catherine, 1997, “Where Standpoint Stands Now,” Women and Politics, 18: 25–43. (Scholar)
Hull, Gloria, Patricia Scott, and Barbara Smith (eds.), 1982, All the Women Are White, All the Blacks Are Men, But Some of Us Are Brave, Old Westbury, N.Y.: Feminist Press. (Scholar)
Intemann, Kristen, 2001, “Science and Values: Are Value Judgments Always Irrelevant to the Justification of Scientific Claims?,” Philosophy of Science, 68: S506–S518. (Scholar)
–––, 2005, “Feminism, Underdetermination, and Values in Science,” Philosophy of Science, 72: 1001–12. (Scholar)
–––, 2010, “25 Years of Feminist Empiricism and Standpoint Theory: Where Are We Now?,” Hypatia, 25(4): 778–796. (Scholar)
–––, 2016, “Feminist Standpoint,” in The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory, Lisa Disch and Mary Hawkesworth (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Jaggar, Alison, 1989, “Love and Knowledge: Emotion in Feminist Epistemology,” in Garry and Pearsall 1989. (Scholar)
Jayaratne, Toby and Abigail Stewart, 1991, “Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in the Social Sciences: Current Feminist Issues and Practical Strategies,” in Beyond Methodology, Mary Fonow and Judith Cook (eds.), Bloomington, Ind.: University of Indiana Press. (Scholar)
Jones, Karen, 2002, “The Politics of Credibility,” in Antony and Witt 2002, 2nd edition. (Scholar)
Keller, Evelyn Fox, 1983, A Feeling for the Organism, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman. (Scholar)
–––, 1985a, Reflections on Gender and Science, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1985b, “The Force of the Pacemaker Concept in Theories of Aggregation in Cellular Slime Mold,” in Keller 1985a. (Scholar)
Kalbfleisch, Pamela (ed.), 1995, Gender, Power, and Communication in Human Relationships, Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. (Scholar)
Kuhn, Thomas, 1977, “Objectivity, Value Judgment and Theory Choice,” In The Essential Tension, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Kwong, Jack, 2015, “Epistemic Injustice and Open-Mindedness,” Hypatia, 30(2): 337–351. (Scholar)
Lacey, Hugh, 1999, Is Science Value Free?, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
Leacock, Eleanor Burke, 1981, Myths of Male Dominance, New York: Monthly Review Press. (Scholar)
Little, Margaret, 1995, “Seeing and Caring: the Role of Affect in Feminist Moral Epistemology,” Hypatia, 10: 117–137. (Scholar)
Lloyd, Elisabeth, 1995a, “Feminism as Method: What Scientists Get that Philosophers Don’t,” Philosophical Topics, 23: 189–220. (Scholar)
–––, 1995b, “Objectivity and the Double Standard for Feminist Epistemologies,” Synthese, 104: 351–381. (Scholar)
–––, 1997a, “Feyerabend, Mill, and Pluralism,” Philosophy of Science, 64: 396–407. (Scholar)
–––, 1997b, “Science and Anti-Science: Objectivity and its Real Enemies,” in Nelson, Lynn and Jack Nelson (eds.), Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 217–259. (Scholar)
–––, 2006, The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Longino, Helen, 1989, “Can there Be a Feminist Science?,” in Garry and Pearsall 1989. (Scholar)
–––, 1990, Science as Social Knowledge, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1993a, “Essential Tensions—Phase Two: Feminist, Philosophical, and Social Studies of Science,” in Antony and Witt 1993. (Scholar)
–––, 1993b, “Subjects, Power, and Knowledge: Description and Prescription in Feminist Philosophy of Science,” in Alcoff and Potter 1993. (Scholar)
–––, 1994, “In Search of Feminist Epistemology,” Monist, 77: 472–485. (Scholar)
–––, 2001, The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Lorde, Audre, 1984, Sister Outsider, Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press. (Scholar)
Lugones, Maria, 1987, “Playfulness, ‘World’-Traveling, and Loving Perception,” Hypatia, 2: 3–19. (Scholar)
Lugones, Maria, and Elizabeth Spelman, 1983, “Have We Got a Theory for You! Feminist Theory, Cultural Imperialism, and the Demand for ‘The Woman’s Voice’?,” Women’s Studies International Forum, 6: 573–581. (Scholar)
Lukács, Georg, 1971, “Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat,” in History and Class Consciousness, Rodney Livingstone (trans.), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press (Scholar)
MacKinnon, Catherine, 1989, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2000, “Points against Postmodernism,” Chicago-Kent Law Review, 75:687–712. (Scholar)
Margonis, Frank, 2007, “John Dewey, W.E.B. DuBois, and Alain Locke: A Case Study in White Ignorance and Intellectual Segregation,” in Sullivan and Tuana. (Scholar)
Martin, Emily, 1996, “The Egg and the Sperm: How Science has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles,” in Feminism and Science, Evelyn Fox Keller and Helen Longino (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Marx, Karl, 1964, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, New York: International Publishers. (Scholar)
Mason, Rebecca, 2011, “Two Kinds of Unknowing,” Hypatia, 26(2): 294–307. (Scholar)
Medina, José, 2013, The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and Resistant Imaginations, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Merchant, Carolyn, 1980, The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution, New York: Harper and Row. (Scholar)
Meynell, Lititia, 2012, “Evolutionary Psychology, Ethology, and Essentialism (Because What They Don’t Know Can Hurt Us),” Hypatia, 27(1): 4–27. (Scholar)
Mills, Charles, 2007, “White Ignorance,” in Sullivan and Tuana. (Scholar)
Moulton, Janice, 1983, “A Paradigm of Philosophy: The Adversary Method,” in Harding and Hintikka 1983. (Scholar)
Nanda, Meera, 2003, “Modern Science as the Standpoint of the Oppressed: Dewey Meets the Buddha of India’s Dalits,” in Pinnick, Koertge and Almeder. (Scholar)
Nelson, Lynn Hankinson, 1990, Who Knows: From Quine to a Feminist Empiricism, Philadelphia, Pa.: Temple University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1993, “Epistemological Communities,” in Alcoff and Potter 1993. (Scholar)
Nicholson, Linda (ed.), 1990, Feminism/Postmodernism, New York and London: Routledge. (Scholar)
Nielsen, Joyce (ed.), 1990, Feminist Research Methods, Boulder, Col.: Westview. (Scholar)
Perez, Caroline Criado, 2019, Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men, New York: Abrams. (Scholar)
Pinnick, Cassandra, Noretta Koertge and Robert Almeder (eds.), 2003, Scrutinizing Feminist Epistemology: An Examination of Gender in Science, New Brunswick: Rutgers. (Scholar)
Pitts-Taylor, Victoria, 2013, “I feel your pain: Embodied Knowledges and Situated Neurons,” Hypatia, 28(4): 852–869. (Scholar)
Potter, Elizabeth, 1993, “Gender and Epistemic Negotiation,” in Alcoff and Potter 1993. (Scholar)
Pohlhaus, Gaile, 2011, “Relational Knowing and Epistemic Injustice: Toward a Theory of Willful Hermeneutical Ignorance,” Hypatia, 27(4): 715–735. (Scholar)
–––, 1996, “Loopholes, Gaps, and What is Held Fast: Democratic Epistemology and Claims to Recovered Memories,” Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology, 3: 238–254. (Scholar)
Proctor, Robert and Londa Schiebinger (eds.), 2008, Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance, Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
Quine, W. V. O., 1963, “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” in From a Logical Point of View, New York: Harper & Row. (Scholar)
–––, 1969, “Epistemology Naturalized,” in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
Reinharz, Shulamit, 1992, Feminist Methods in Social Research, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Rolin, Kristina, 2006, “The Bias Paradox in Feminist Standpoint Epistemology,” Episteme, 3(1–2): 125–37. (Scholar)
–––, 2009, “Standpoint Theory as a Methodology for the Study of Power Relations,” Hypatia, 24(4): 218–26. (Scholar)
Rooney, Phyllis, 1991, “Gendered Reason: Sex Metaphor and Conceptions of Reason,” Hypatia, 6: 77–103. (Scholar)
Rose, Hilary, 1987, “Hand, Brain, and Heart: A Feminist Epistemology for the Natural Sciences,” in Harding and O’Barr 1987. (Scholar)
Ruetsche, Laura, 2004, “Virtue and Contingent History: Possibilities for Feminist Epistemology,” Hypatia, 19(1): 73–101. (Scholar)
Schiebinger, Londa, 1989, The Mind Has No Sex?, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2007, Plants and Empire: Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Shapin, Steven, 1994, A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Sherif, Carol, 1987, “Bias in Psychology,” in Harding 1987a. (Scholar)
Sholock, Adale, 2012, “Methodology of the Privileged: White Anti-racist Feminism, Systematic Ignorance, and Epistemic Uncertainty,” Hypatia, 27(4): 701–714. (Scholar)
Solomon, Miriam, 2001, Social Empiricism, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2009, “Standpoint and Creativity,” Hypatia, 24(4): 226–37. (Scholar)
Spanier, Bonnie, 1995, Im/partial Science: Gender Ideology in Molecular Biology, Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
Spelman, Elizabeth, 1988, Inessential Woman, Boston: Beacon Press. (Scholar)
Stanley, Liz and Sue Wise, 1983, Breaking Out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
Sullivan, Shannon and Nancy Tuana (eds.), 2007, Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance, Albany: SUNY Press. (Scholar)
Tavris, Carol, 1992, The Mismeasure of Women, New York: Simon and Schuster. (Scholar)
Taylor, Charles, 1985, “Neutrality in Political Science,” in Philosophy and the Human Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Tiles, Mary, 1987, “A Science of Mars or of Venus?,” Philosophy, 62: 293–306. (Scholar)
Tiles, Mary and Hans Oberdiek, 1995, Living in a Technological Culture, London and New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
Tobin, Theresa and Alison Jaggar, 2013, “Naturalizing Moral Justification: Rethinking the Mission of Moral Epistemology,” Metaphilosophy, 44(4): 409–439. (Scholar)
Tuana, Nancy (ed.), 1989, Feminism and Science, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
––– and Shannon Sullivan, 2006, “Introduction: Feminist Epistemologies of Ignorance,” Hypatia, 21(3): vii–ix. (Scholar)
West, Candace and Don Zimmerman, 1987, “Doing Gender,” Gender and Society, 1: 125–51. (Scholar)
Williams, Bernard, 1978, Descartes: the Project of Pure Enquiry, Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press. (Scholar)
Wylie, Alison, 1996, “The Constitution of Archaeological Evidence: Gender Politics and Science,” in The Disunity of Science, P. Galison and D. Stump (eds.), Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2003, “Why Standpoint Matters,” in Science and Other Cultures, R. Figueroa and S. Harding (eds.), New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
––– and Lynn Hankinson Nelson, 2007, “Coming to Terms with the Values of Science: Insights from Feminist Science Studies Scholarship,” in Value-Free Science? Ideals and Illusion, Harold Kincaid, John Dupré, and Alison Wylie (eds.), New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2009, “Social Constructionist Arguments in Harding’s Science and Social Inequality,” Hypatia, 23(4): 201–11. (Scholar)
Young, I. M. 1990, Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Political Theory, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)

Generated Sun May 28 12:14:44 2023

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...