Works Cited

• Abbey, Ruth, 2007, “Back toward a Comprehensive Liberalism?: Justice as Fairness, Gender, and Families”, Political Theory, 35(1): 5–28. doi:10.1177/0090591706295052 (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, The Return of Feminist Liberalism, Montréal & Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013a, “Introduction: Biography of a Bibliography: Three Decades of Feminist Response to Rawls”, in Abbey 2013b: 1–23. (Scholar)
• ––– (ed.), 2013b, Feminist Interpretations of Rawls, College Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. (Scholar)
• Almodovar, Norma Jean, 2002, “For Their Own Good: The Results of the Prostitution Laws as Enforced by Cops, Politicians, and Judges”, in McElroy 2002d: 71–87. (Scholar)
• Alstott, Linda, 2004, No Exit: What Parents Owe Their Children and What Society Owes Parents, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Altman, Andrew and Lori Watson, 2019, Debating Pornography, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780199358700.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Anderson, Elizabeth, 1990, “The Ethical Limitations of the Market”, Economics and Philosophy, 6(2): 179–205. doi:10.1017/s0266267100001218 (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “Toward a Non-Ideal, Relational Methodology for Political Philosophy: Comments on Schwartzman’s Challenging Liberalism”, Hypatia, 24(4): 130–145. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01062.x (Scholar)
• Andersson, Anna-Karin, 2007, “An Alleged Contradiction in Nozick’s Entitlement Theory”, The Journal of Libertarian Studies, 21(3): 43–63. (Scholar)
• Antony, Louise M. and Charlotte E. Witt (eds.), 1993, A Mind of One’s Own, Oxford: Westview. doi:10.4324/9780429502682 (Scholar)
• Arruzza, Cinzia, Tithi Bahhattacharya, and Nancy Fraser, 2019, Feminism for the 99%: A Manifesto, Londo: Verso. (Scholar)
• Baehr, Amy R., 1996, “Toward a New Feminist Liberalism: Okin, Rawls, and Habermas”, Hypatia, 11(1): 49–66. Reprinted in The Philosophy of Rawls: A Collection of Essays (Volume 3), Henry S. Richardson and Paul J. Weithman (eds.), New York: Garland Publishing, 1999: 295–312. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1996.tb00506.x (Scholar)
• ––– (ed.), 2004, Varieties of Feminist Liberalism, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008, “Perfectionism, Feminism and Public Reason”, Law and Philosophy, 27(2): 193–222. doi:10.1007/s10982-007-9017-3 (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, “Liberal Feminism: Comprehensive and Political”, in Abbey 2013b: 150–166. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, “A Capacious Account of Liberal Feminism”, Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 3(1): art. 4. doi:10.5206/fpq/2016.3.4 (Scholar)
• –––, 2021, “Political Constructivism and Justice in Caregiving”, in Bhandary and Baehr 2021: ch. 8, pp. 187–212. (Scholar)
• Barclay, Linda, 2013, “Liberal Daddy Quotas: Why Men Should Take Care of the Children, and How Liberals Can Get Them to Do It”, Hypatia, 28(1): 163–178. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01255.x (Scholar)
• Benhabib, Seyla, 1992, Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Bhandary, Asha, 2010, “Dependency in Justice: Can Rawlsian Liberalism Accommodate Kittay’s Dependency Critique?”, Hypatia, 25(1): 140–156. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01088.x (Scholar)
• –––, 2019, Freedom to Care: Liberalism, Dependency Care, and Culture, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Bhandary, Asha and Amy R. Baehr (eds.), 2021, Caring for Liberalism: Dependency and Liberal Political Theory, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Block, Walter, 1991, “Levin on Feminism and Freedom”, Journal of Libertarian Studies, 10(1): 97–106. (Scholar)
• Bojer, Hilde, 2002, “Women and the Rawlsian Social Contract”, Social Justice Research, 15(4): 393–407. doi:10.1023/a:1021223225278 (Scholar)
• Brake, Elizabeth, 2004, “Rawls and Feminism: What Should Feminists Make of Liberal Neutrality?”, Journal of Moral Philosophy, 1(3): 293–309. doi:10.1177/174046810400100305 (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, Minimizing Marriage: Marriage, Morality, and the Law, New York: Oxford. (Scholar)
• Brighouse, Harry and Erik Olin Wright, 2008, “Strong Gender Egalitarianism”, Politics & Society, 36(3): 360–372. doi:10.1177/0032329208320566 (Scholar)
• Brison, Susan J., 1997, “Outliving Oneself: Trauma, Memory and Personal Identity”, in Meyers 1997: 12–39. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998, “The Autonomy Defense of Free Speech”, Ethics, 108(2): 312–339. doi:10.1086/233807 (Scholar)
• Browne, Jude (ed.), 2007, The Future of Gender, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511619205 (Scholar)
• Case, Mary Anne, 2006, “Marriage Licenses”,Minnesota Law Review, 89: 1758–1796. (Scholar)
• Chambers, Clare, 2008, Sex, Culture, and Justice: The Limits of Choice, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, Against Marriage: An Egalitarian Defence of the Marriage-Free State, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198744009.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Church, Jennifer, 1997, “Ownership and the Body”, in Meyers 1997: 85–103. (Scholar)
• Cohen, Joshua, Matthew Howard, and Martha C. Nussbaum (eds.), 1999, Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Conway, David, 1998, Free-Market Feminism, London: Institute of Economic Affairs. (Scholar)
• Cornell, Drucilla, 1998, At the Heart of Freedom: Feminism, Sex, and Equality, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, “Autonomy Re-Imagined”, Journal for the Psychoanalysis of Culture and Society, 8(1): 144–149. doi:10.1353/psy.2003.0008 (Scholar)
• Cudd, Ann E., 2004, “The Paradox of Liberal Feminism: Preference Rationality, and Oppression”, in Baehr 2004: 37–62. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, Analyzing Oppression, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Cudd, Ann and Nancy Holmstrom, 2011, Capitalism For and Against: A Feminist Debate, New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511920981 (Scholar)
• Dworkin, Andrea, 1991, “Terror, Torture, and Resistance”, Canadian Women’s Studies, 12(1): 37–42. [Dworkin 1991 available online] (Scholar)
• –––, 1992, Forbidden Grounds: The Case Against Employment Discrimination Laws, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Eaton, Anne W., 2007, “A Sensible Antiporn Feminism”, Ethics, 117(4): 674–715. doi:10.1086/519226 (Scholar)
• Edmundson, William A., 2017, John Rawls: Reticent Socialist, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Eichner, Maxine, 2010, The Supportive State, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195343212.001.0001 (Scholar)
• –––, 2021, “The Free-Market Family: Liberalism, Families, and Government’s Responsibility to Regulate the Market”, in Bhandary and Baehr 2021: ch. 10, pp. 238–265. (Scholar)
• Engster, Daniel, 2001, “Mary Wollstonecraft’s Nurturing Liberalism: Between an Ethic of Justice and Care”, American Political Science Review, 95(3): 577–588. doi:10.1017/s0003055401003136 (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, “The Place of Parenting within a Liberal Theory of Justice: The Private Parenting Model, Parental Licenses, or Public Parenting Support?”, Social Theory and Practice, 36(2): 233–262. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract201036213 (Scholar)
• Enslin, Penny, 2003, “Liberal Feminism, Diversity and Education”, Theory and Research in Education, 1(1): 73–87. doi:10.1177/1477878503001001005 (Scholar)
• Epstein, Richard, 2002, “Liberty and Feminism”, in McElroy 2002d: 30–42. (Scholar)
• Folbre, Nancy, 1984, “The Pauperization of Motherhood: Patriarchy and Public Policy in the United States”, Review of Radical Political Economics, 16(4): 72–88. doi:10.1177/048661348401600406 (Scholar)
• Follesdal, Andreas, 2005, “Exit, Choice, and Loyalty: Religious Liberty versus Gender Equality”, Journal of Social Philosophy, 36(4): 407–420. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2005.00285.x (Scholar)
• Fox-Genovese, Elizabeth, 1991, Feminism Without Illusions: A Critique of Individualism, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1996, Feminism is Not the Story of My Life: How Today’s Feminist Elite Has Lost Touch With the Real Concerns of Women, London: Doubleday. (Scholar)
• Fraser, Nancy, 2013, Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis, Brooklyn: Verso. (Scholar)
• Gaus, Gerald, Shane D. Courtland, and David Schmidts, 2018, “Liberalism”,, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/liberalism/>. (Scholar)
• Gheaus, Anca, 2008, “Basic Income, Gender Justice and the Costs of Gender-Symmetrical Lifestyles”, Basic Income Studies, 3(3): art. 8. doi:10.2202/1932-0183.1134 (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “The Challenge of Care to Idealizing Theories of Distributive Justice”, in Tessman 2009: 105–119. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6841-6_7">10.1007/978-1-4020-6841-6_7 (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Gender Justice”, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 6(1): 1–25. doi:10.26556/jesp.v6i1.60 (Scholar)
• Gheaus, Anca and Ingrid Robeyns, 2011, “Equality-Promoting Parental Leave: Equality-Promoting Parental Leave”, Journal of Social Philosophy, 42(2): 173–191. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01525.x (Scholar)
• Gornick, Janet C. and Marcia K. Meyers, 2008, “Creating Gender Egalitarian Societies: An Agenda for Reform”, Politics & Society, 36(3): 313–349. doi:10.1177/0032329208320562 (Scholar)
• Green, Karen, 2006, “Parity and Procedural Justice”, Essays in Philosophy, 7(1): 18–28. doi:10.5840/eip20067116 (Scholar)
• Hampton, Jean, 1993, “Feminist Contractarianism”, in Antony and Witt 1993: 227–256. (Scholar)
• Hanen, Marsha P and Kai Nielsen (eds.), 1987, Science, Morality, and Feminist Theory, Calgary: University of Calgary Press. (Scholar)
• Hartley, Christie and Lori Watson, 2010, “Is a Feminist Political Liberalism Possible?”, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 5(1): 1–22. doi:10.26556/jesp.v5i1.48 (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Political Liberalism, Marriage and the Family”, Law and Philosophy, 31(2): 185–212. doi:10.1007/s10982-011-9119-9 (Scholar)
• Hay, Carol, 2013, Kantianism, Liberalism, and Feminism: Resisting Oppression, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
• Held, Virginia, 1987, “Non-contractual Society: A Feminist View”, in Hanen and Nielsen 1987: 111–138. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006a, The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global, New York: Oxford. doi:10.1093/0195180992.001.0001 (Scholar)
• –––, 2006b, “Liberalism and the Ethics of Care”, in Held 2006a: ch. 5. (Scholar)
• Holmstrom, Nancy, 2011, “Against Capitalism as Theory and as Reality”, in Cudd and Holmstrom 2011: 133–260. (Scholar)
• Jaggar, Alison, 1983, Feminist Politics and Human Nature, Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
• Jeske, Diane, 1996, “Libertarianism, Self-Ownership, and Motherhood”:, Social Theory and Practice, 22(2): 137–160. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract19962225 (Scholar)
• Khader, Serene J., 2011, Adaptive Preferences and Women’s Empowerment, New York: Oxford. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199777884.001.0001 (Scholar)
• –––, 2018, Decolonizing Universalism: A Transnational Feminist Ethic, New York: Oxford. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190664190.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Kirp, David L., Mark G. Yudof, and Marlene Strong Franks, 1986, Gender Justice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Kittay, Eva Feder, 1995, “Taking Dependency Seriously: The Family and Medical Leave Act Considered in Light of the Social Organization of Dependency Work and Gender Equality”, Hypatia, 10(1): 8–29. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb01351.x (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Laden, Anthony Simon, 2003, “Radical Liberals, Reasonable Feminists: Reason, Power and Objectivity in MacKinnon and Rawls”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 11(2): 133–152. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00171 (Scholar)
• Lehrman, Karen, 1997, The Lipstick Proviso: Women, Sex & Power in the Real World, New York: Anchor/Doubleday. (Scholar)
• Lloyd, S.A., 1995, “Situating a Feminist Critique of John Rawls’ Political Liberalism”, Loyola Law Review, 28(4): 1319–1344. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998, “Toward a Liberal Theory of Sexual Equality”, Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 9: 203–224. (Scholar)
• Mackenzie, Catriona, 2000, “Imagining Oneself Otherwise”, in Mackenzie and Stoljar 2000b: 124–150. (Scholar)
• Mackenzie, Catriona and Natalie Stoljar, 2000a, “Introduction: Autonomy Refigured”, in Mackenzie and Stoljar 2000b: 3–34. (Scholar)
• ––– (eds.), 2000b, Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• MacKinnon, Catharine, 1987, Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1989, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Mansbridge, Jane, 1999, “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’”, The Journal of Politics, 61(3): 628–657. doi:10.2307/2647821 (Scholar)
• McElroy, Wendy (ed.), 1991a, Freedom, Feminism and the State: An Overview of Individualist Feminism, second edition, Chicago: Ivan R. Dee. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991b, “The Roots of Individualist Feminism in 19th-Century America”, in McElroy 1991a: 3–26. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995, XXX: A Woman’s Right to Pornography, New York: St. Martin’s Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998a, The Reasonable Woman: A Guide to Intellectual Survival, Amherst, MA: Prometheus Books. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998b, “The Non-Absurdity of Natural Law”, The Freeman, 48(2): 108–111. [McElroy 1998b available online] (Scholar)
• –––, 2002a, “Introduction: Foundation of Individualist Freedom”, in McElroy 2002d: 5–26. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002b, “What Does Affirmative Action Affirm?” in McElroy 2002d: 181–188. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002c, “Breeder Reactionaries: The ‘Feminist’ War on New Reproductive Technologies”, in McElroy 2002d: 267–278. (Scholar)
• ––– (ed.), 2002d, Liberty for Women: Freedom and Feminism in the Twenty-First Century, Chicago: Ivan R. Dee. (Scholar)
• McClain, Linda, 2006, The Place of Families: Fostering Capacity, Equality and Responsibility, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Metz, Tamara, 2010, Untying the Knot: Marriage, the State, and the Case for their Divorce, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Meyers, Diana Tietjens (ed.), 1997, Feminists Rethink the Self, Boulder, CO: Westview. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, Gender in the Mirror: Cultural Images and Women’s Agency, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0195140419.001.0001 (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, Being Yourself: Essays on Identity, Action, and Social Life, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
• Mills, Charles W., 2017, Black Rights/White Wrongs: The Critique of Racial Liberalism, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190245412.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Minow, Martha, 1990, Making All the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar) (Scholar)
• Morse, Jennifer Roback, 2001, Love and Economics: Why the Laissez-Faire Family Doesn’t Work, Dallas, TX: Spence Publishing. (Scholar)
• Muller, Jerry Z., 1997a, “What Is Conservative Social and Political Thought?” in Muller 1997b: 3–31. (Scholar)
• ––– (ed.), 1997b, Conservatism: An Anthology of Social and Political Thought from David Hume to the Present, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Munoz-Darde, Veronique, 1998, “Rawls, Justice in the Family and Justice of the Family”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 48(192): 335–352. doi:10.1111/1467-9213.00104 (Scholar)
• Neufeld, Blain, 2009, “Coercion, the Basic Structure, and the Family”, Journal of Social Philosophy, 40(1): 37–54. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2009.01437.x (Scholar)
• Neufeld, Blain and Chad Van Schoelandt, 2014, “Political Liberalism, Ethos Justice, and Gender Equality”, Law and Philosophy, 33(1): 75–104. doi:10.1007/s10982-013-9174-5 (Scholar)
• Nozick, Robert, 1974, Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
• Nussbaum, Martha C., 1999a, Sex and Social Justice, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999b, “A Plea for Difficulty”, in Cohen, Howard, and Nussbaum 1999: 105–114. (Scholar)
• –––, 2000a, Women and Human Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511841286 (Scholar)
• –––, 2000b, “The Future of Feminist Liberalism”, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 74(2): 47–79. doi:10.2307/3219683 (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership, Cambridge, MA: Belknap. (Scholar)
• Okin, Susan Moller, 1989, Justice, Gender and the Family, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994, “Political Liberalism, Justice, and Gender”, Ethics, 105(1): 23–43. doi:10.1086/293677 (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, “Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?” in Cohen, Howard, and Nussbaum 1999: 7–26. (Scholar)
• O’Neill, Martin and Thad Williamson (eds.), 2012, Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls and Beyond, Malden, MA: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Pateman, Carol and Charles Mills, 2007, Contract and Domination, Malden, MA: Polity Press. (Scholar)
• Paul, Ellen Frankel, 1989, Equity and Gender: The Comparable Worth Debate, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, “Fetal Protection and Freedom of Contract”, in McElroy 2002d: 131–151. (Scholar)
• Paul, Ellen Frankel, Fred Miller, Jr, and Jeffrey Paul (eds), 2007, Liberalism Old and New, (Social Philosophy and Policy, 24, part 1), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Pearce, Diana, 1978, “The Feminization of Poverty”, Urban & Social Change Review, 11(1–2): 28–36. (Scholar)
• Phillips, Anne, 1991, Engendering Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “Defending Equality of Outcome”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(1): 1–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00188.x (Scholar)
• Presley, Sharon, 2000, “No Authority But Oneself: The Anarchist Feminist Philosophy of Autonomy and Freedom”, Social Anarchism, 27(Fall–Winter): art. 3. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, Think For Yourself: Questioning Pressures to Conform, Berkeley, CA: Ronin Publishing. (Scholar)
• Presley, Sharon and Lynn Kinsky, 1991, “Government is Women’s Enemy”, in McElroy 1991a: 77–86. (Scholar)
• Presley, Sharon and Crispin Sartwell (eds.), 2005, Exquisite Rebel: Essays of Voltairine de Cleyre—Feminist, Anarchist, Genius, Albany, NY: State University of New York. (Scholar)
• Radzik, Linda, 2005, “Justice in the Family: A Defence of Feminist Contractarianism”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 22(1): 45–54. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.2005.00291.x (Scholar)
• Rawls, John, 1958, “Justice as Fairness”, The Philosophical Review, 67(2): 164–194. doi:10.2307/2182612 (Scholar)
• –––, 1971, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1975, “Fairness to Goodness”, The Philosophical Review, 84(4): 536–554. Reprinted in Rawls 1999: 267–285. doi:10.2307/2183853 (Scholar)
• –––, 1993, Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, John Rawls: Collected Papers, Samuel Freeman (ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Reiheld, Alison, 2015, “Just Caring for Caregivers: What Society and the State Owe to Those Who Render Care”, Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 1(2). doi:10.5206/fpq/2015.2.1 (Scholar)
• Rhode, Deborah L., 1994, “Feminism and the State”, Harvard Law Review, 107(6): 1181–1208. (Scholar)
• –––, 1997, Speaking of Sex: The Denial of Gender Inequality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Reich, Robert and Debra Satz (eds.), 2009, Toward a Humanist Justice: The Political Philosophy of Susan Moller Okin, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195337396.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Robeyns, Ingrid, 2007, “When Will Society Be Gender-Just?” in Browne 2007: 54–74. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511619205.004 (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Care, Gender, and Property-Owning Democracy”, in O’Neill and Williamson 2012: 163–179. (Scholar)
• Roiphe, Katie, 1994, The Morning After: Sex, Fear and Feminism, Boston, MA: Back Bay Books. (Scholar)
• Rosenblatt, Helena, 2018, The Lost History of Liberalism: From Ancient Rome to the Twenty-First Century, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Sample, Ruth, 2002, “Why Feminist Contractarianism?”, Journal of Social Philosophy, 33(2): 257–281. doi:10.1111/0047-2786.00008 (Scholar)
• Sandberg, Cheryl, 2013, Women, Work, and the Will To Lead, New York: Random House. (Scholar)
• Satz, Debra, 2010, Why Some Things Are Not For Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311594.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Schouten, Gina, 2013, “Restricting Justice: Political Interventions in the Home and in the Market: Restricting Justice”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 41(4): 357–388. doi:10.1111/papa.12022 (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, “Citizenship, Reciprocity, and the Gendered Division of Labor: A Stability Argument for Gender Egalitarian Political Interventions”, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 16(2): 174–209. doi:10.1177/1470594x15600830 (Scholar)
• –––, 2019, Liberalism, Neutrality, and the Gendered Division of Labor, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198813071.001.0001 (Scholar)
• –––, 2021, “Justice and Legitimacy in Caregiver Support: A Proposal for Managing Tradeoffs between Gender Egalitarian and Economic Egalitarian Social Aims”, in Bhandary and Baehr 2021: ch. 11, pp. 266–291. (Scholar)
• Schwartzman, Lisa, 2006, Challenging Liberalism: Feminism as Political Critique, College Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. (Scholar)
• Scoccia, Danny, 1996, “Can Liberals Support a Ban on Violent Pornography?”, Ethics, 106(4): 776–799. doi:10.1086/233672 (Scholar)
• Shachar, Ayelet, 2009, “What We Owe Women”, in Reich and Satz 2009: 143–165. (Scholar)
• Shulman, Alex Kates, 1970 [2012], “A Marriage Agreement”, Up From Under, 1(2): 5–8; adapted and reprinted in A Marriage Agreement and Other Essays: Four Decades of Feminist Writing, New York: Open Road Media, 2012. (Scholar)
• Simon, Rita, 2002, “Women and Violent Crime”, in McElroy 2002d: 231–237. (Scholar)
• Smith, Patricia, 2004, “Liberalism as an Antidote to Stereotyping”, in Baehr 2004: 21–36. (Scholar)
• Sommers, Christina Hoff, 1994, Who Stole Feminism? How Women Have Betrayed Women, New York: Simon and Schuster. (Scholar)
• –––, 2000, The War Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism is Harming Our Young Men, New York: Simon and Schuster. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “The Subjection of Islamic Women”, Weekly Standard, 12(34). [Sommers 2007 available online] (Scholar)
• Spaulding, Christina, 1988–89, “Anti-Pornography Laws as a Claim for Equal Respect: Feminism, Liberalism & Community”,Berkeley Women’s Law Journal, 4(1): 128–165. (Scholar)
• Stanton, Elizabeth Cady, 1882, “The Solitude of Self”, The Woman’s Column, January 1882, 2–3. Reprinted in Ellen Carol DuBois (ed.), Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony: Correspondence, Writings, and Speeches, New York: Schocken Books, 1981, p. 247. [Stanton 1882 available online] (Scholar)
• Stark, Cynthia, 2021, “Moral Desert, Justice as Fairness, and the Gendered Division of Labor”, in Bhandary and Baehr 2021: ch. 7, pp. 168–186. (Scholar)
• Stevens, Richard W., Hugo Teufel III, and Matthew Y. Biscan, 2002, “Disarming Women: Comparing ‘Gun Control’ to Self-Defense”, in McElroy 2002d: 238–263. (Scholar)
• Stolba, Christine and Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 1999, Women’s Figures: An Illustrated Guide to the Economic Progress of Women in America, Washington, DC: AEI Press and Independent Women’s Forum. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, The Feminist Dilemma: When Success Is Not Enough, Washington, DC: AEI Press. (Scholar)
• Strossen, Nadine, 2000, Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex and the Fight for Women’s Rights, New York: New York University Press. (Scholar)
• Tabarrok, Alexander, 2002, “Abortion and Liberty”, in McElroy 2002d: 152–177. (Scholar)
• Taylor, Joan Kennedy, 1992, Reclaiming the Mainstream: Individualist Feminism Rediscovered, Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, What You Can Do About Sexual Harassment When You Don’t Want to Call the Cops, New York: New York University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, “A New View of the Libertarian Family: Review of Love and Economics: Why the Laissez-Faire Family Doesn’t Work, by Jennifer Roback Morse”, Association of Libertarian Feminists (ALF) News, 80. [Taylor 2001 available online] (Scholar)
• Tessman, Lisa (ed.), 2009, Feminist Ethics and Social and Political Philosophy: Theorizing the Non-Ideal, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6841-6 (Scholar)
• Thompson, Janna, 1993, “What Do Women Want? Rewriting the Social Contract”, International Journal of Moral and Social Studies, 8: 257–272. (Scholar)
• Thurschwell, Adam, 1999, “Radical Feminist Liberalism: At the Heart of Freedom: Feminism, Sex, and Equality, by Drucilla Cornell”, Rutgers Law Review, 51(3): 745–776. (Scholar)
• Tomasi, John, 2009, “Can Feminism be Liberated from Governmentalism?” in Reich and Satz 2009: 67–92. (Scholar)
• Warnick, Ashlie, 2003, “IFeminism. Review of Liberty for Women: Freedom and Feminism in the Twenty-First Century, Edited by Wendy McElroy”, Michigan Law Review, 101(6): 1602–1621. (Scholar)
• Watson, Lori, 2007, “Constituting Politics: Power, Reciprocity, and Identity”, Hypatia, 22(4): 96–112. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2007.tb01322.x (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, “Why Sex Work Isn’t Work Logos Journal”, Logos: A Journal of Modern Society & Culture, 13(3–4): art. 1. [Watson 2014 available online] (Scholar)
• –––, 2019, “A Defense of a Sex Equality Approach to Pornography”, in Altman and Watson 2019: 151–297. (Scholar)
• Watson, Lori and Christie Hartley, 2018, Equal Citizenship and Public Reason: A Feminist Political Liberalism, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190683023.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Williams, Joan, 2000, Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About It, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Wolf, Christopher (ed.), 2004, Liberalism at the Crossroads: An Introduction to Contemporary Liberal Political Theory and Its Critics, second Edition, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
• Wolf-Devine, Celia, 2004, “The Hegemonic Liberalism of Susan Moller Okin”, in Wolf 2004: 41–59. (Scholar)
• Wright, Erik Olin, 2008, “Institutions Promoting Gender Egalitarian Families”, Politics & Society, 36(3): 311–312. doi:10.1177/0032329208320561 (Scholar)
• Young, Cathy, 1992, “Women, Sex and Rape”, Washington Post (National Weekly Edition) July 29, 1992, p. 25. [Young 1992 available online]. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “Taking Science Seriously: Conservative Dogma About Sex Roles Ignores Inconvenient Realities”, Reason: Free Minds and Free Markets, August/September issue: 16–18. [Young 2004 available online] (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, “Are Muslim Women Oppressed? An Exploration of the Place of Women in Islam”, on Reason: Free Minds and Free Markets, 24 October 2006. [Young 2006 available online] (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Enforcing Virtue”, Reason: Free Minds and Free Markets, March issue: 16–17. [Young 2007 available online] (Scholar)
• Young, Iris, 1990, Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Yuracko, Kimberly, 2003, Perfectionism and Contemporary Feminist Values, Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press. (Scholar)

Additional Sources

• Abbey, Ruth, 1999, “Back to the Future: Marriage as Friendship in the Thought of Mary Wollstonecraft”, Hypatia, 14(3): 78–95. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1999.tb01053.x (Scholar)
• Allen, Anita L., 2003, Why Privacy Isn’t Everything: Feminist Reflections on Personal Accountability, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
• Almeder, Robert F., 1994, “Liberal Feminism and Academic Feminism”, Public Affairs Quarterly, 8(4): 299–315. (Scholar)
• Anderson, Elizabeth S., 1991, “John Stuart Mill and Experiments in Living”, Ethics, 102(1): 4–26. doi:10.1086/293367 (Scholar)
• Antony, Louise M., 1998, “Back to Androgyny: What Bathrooms Can Teach Us About Equality”, Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 9: 1–20. (Scholar)
• Baehr, Amy R., 2003, “A Feminist Liberal Approach to Hate Crime Legislation”, Journal of Social Philosophy, 34(1): 134–152. doi:10.1111/1467-9833.00171 (Scholar)
• Bassham, Gregory, 1992, “Feminist Legal Theory: A Liberal Response”, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy, 6: 293–319. (Scholar)
• Baum, Bruce, 1997, “Feminism, Liberalism and Cultural Pluralism: J. S. Mill on Mormon Polygyny”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 5(3): 230–253. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00033 (Scholar)
• Bhandary, Asha, 2016, “A Millian Concept of Care: What Mill’s Defense of the Common Arrangement Can Teach Us About Care”, Social Theory and Practice, 42(1): 155–182. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract20164217 (Scholar)
• Bojer, Hilde, 2000, “Children and Theories of Social Justice”, Feminist Economics, 6(2): 23–39. doi:10.1080/13545700050076098 (Scholar)
• Boucher, Joanne, 2003, “Betty Friedan and the Radical Past of Liberal Feminism”, New Politics, 9(3): 23–32. (Scholar)
• Brake, Elizabeth, 2000, “A Liberal Response to Catharine MacKinnon”, Southwest Philosophical Studies, 22: 17–23. (Scholar)
• Brennan, Samantha, 2004, “The Liberal Rights of Feminist Liberalism”, in Baehr 2004: 85–102. (Scholar)
• Brennan, Jason, Bas von der Vossen and David Schmidtz (ed.), 2018, Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Brison, Susan J., 2006, “Contentious Freedom: Sex Work and Social Construction”, Hypatia, 21(4): 192–200. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01136.x (Scholar)
• Burgess-Jackson, Keith, 1995, “John Stuart Mill, Radical Feminist”:, Social Theory and Practice, 21(3): 369–396. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract19952132 (Scholar)
• Card, Robert F., 2001, “Gender, Justice Within the Family, and the Commitments of Rawlsian Liberalism”, Public Affairs Quarterly, 15(2): 155–171. (Scholar)
• Case, Mary Anne, 1995, “Of Richard Epstein and Other Radical Feminists”, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 18: 369–418. (Scholar)
• Cohen, Joshua, 1992, “Okin on Justice, Gender, and Family”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 22(2): 263–286. doi:10.1080/00455091.1992.10717280 (Scholar)
• Cornell, Drucilla, 1995, The Imaginary Domain: Abortion, Pornography, and Sexual Harassment, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Cudd, Ann E., 2018, "Feminism and Libertarian Self-Ownership", in Brennan, von der Vossen and Schmidtz 2018: 127–139. (Scholar)
• Dimock, Susan, 2008, “Why All Feminists Should Be Contractarians”, Dialogue, 47(2): 273–290. doi:10.1017/s0012217300002614 (Scholar)
• Donner, Wendy, 1993, “John Stuart Mill’s Liberal Feminism”, Philosophical Studies, 69(2–3): 155–166. doi:10.1007/bf00990081 (Scholar)
• Elshtain, Jean Bethke, 1982 [1991], “Antigone’s Daughters”, Democracy, April 1982. Reprinted in McElroy 1991a: 61–76. (Scholar)
• English, Jane, 1977, “Justice between Generations”, Philosophical Studies, 31(2): 91–104. doi:10.1007/bf01857179 (Scholar)
• Engster, Daniel and Maurice Hamington (eds), 2015, Care Ethics and Political Theory, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716341.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Epstein, Richard A., 1999, “Liberty, Patriarchy, and Feminism”, University of Chicago Legal Forum, 89: 106–111. (Scholar)
• Exdell, John, 1994, “Feminism, Fundamentalism, and Liberal Legitimacy”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 24(3): 441–463. doi:10.1080/00455091.1994.10717379 (Scholar)
• Friedan, Betty, 1963 [1974], The Feminine Mystique, New York: Norton. (Scholar)
• Freeman, Samuel (ed.), 2003, Cambridge Companion to Rawls, New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/ccol0521651670 (Scholar)
• Gerson, Gal, 2002, “Liberal Feminism: Individuality and Oppositions in Wollstonecraft and Mill”, Political Studies, 50(4): 794–810. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00008 (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “Gender in the Liberal Tradition: Hobhouse on the Family”, History of Political Thought 25(4): 700–725. (Scholar)
• Gill, Emily R., 2001, Becoming Free: Autonomy and Diversity in the Liberal Polity, Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press. (Scholar)
• Gladstein, Mimi and Chris Sciabarra (eds), 1999, Feminist Interpretations of Ayn Rand, University Park, PA: Penn State University Press. (Scholar)
• Graham, Gordon, 1994, “Liberal vs Radical Feminism Revisited”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 11(2): 155–170. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.1994.tb00105.x (Scholar)
• Green, Karen, 1986, “Rawls, Women and the Priority of Liberty”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64(sup1): 26–36. doi:10.1080/00048402.1986.9755423 (Scholar)
• –––, 1994, “Freud, Wollstonecraft, and Ecofeminism”:, Environmental Ethics, 16(2): 117–134. doi:10.5840/enviroethics199416227 (Scholar)
• Groenhout, Ruth E., 2002, “Essentialist Challenges to Liberal Feminism”, Social Theory and Practice, 28(1): 51–75. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract20022812 (Scholar)
• Hager, Mark M., 1999, “Sex in the Original Position: A Restatement of Liberal Feminism”, University of Wisconsin Women’s Law Journal, 14(2): 181–241. (Scholar)
• Heberle, Renée J. and Benjamin Pryor (eds), 2008, Imagining Law: On Drucilla Cornell, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. (Scholar)
• Hekman, Susan, 1992, “John Stuart Mill’s The Subjection of Women: The Foundations of Liberal Feminism”, History of European Ideas, 15(4–6): 681–686. doi:10.1016/0191-6599(92)90078-q (Scholar)
• Jensen, Pamela Grande (ed.), 1996, Finding a New Feminism: Rethinking the Woman Question for Liberal Democracy, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
• Johnson, Pauline, 1994, Feminism as Radical Humanism, Boulder, CO: Westview. (Scholar)
• Jones, Bernie D., 2003, “Single Motherhood by Choice, Libertarian Feminism, and the Uniform Parentage Act”, Texas Journal of Women and the Law, 12(2): 419–449. (Scholar)
• Kearns, Deborah, 1983, “A Theory of Justice—And Love; Rawls on the Family”, Politics (now the Australian Journal of Political Science), 18(2): 36–42. doi:10.1080/00323268308401886 (Scholar)
• Kensinger, Loretta, 1997, “(In)Quest of Liberal Feminism”, Hypatia, 12(4): 178–197. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1997.tb00303.x (Scholar)
• Kymlicka, Will, 1991, “Rethinking the Family”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 20(1): 77–97. (Scholar)
• Laden, Anthony Simon, 2001, Reasonably Radical: Deliberative Liberalism and the Politics of Identity, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
• Lloyd, S.A., 1994, “Family Justice and Social Justice”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 75(3–4): 353–371. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0114.1994.tb00135.x (Scholar)
• Loudermilk, Kim, 2004, Fictional Feminism: How American Bestsellers Effect the Movement for Women’s Equality, New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203485170 (Scholar)
• Machan, Tibor (ed.), 2006, Liberty and Justice, Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press. (Scholar)
• Makus, Ingrid, 1996, Women, Politics and Reproduction: The Liberal Legacy, Tonawanda, NY: University of Toronto Press. (Scholar)
• McElroy, Wendy, 1981, “Against the ERA”, Libertarian Forum, 15(3–4/June–July): 6–7. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991c, “Abortion”, in McElroy 1991a: 145–156. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998, The Reasonable Woman. A Guide to Intellectual Survival, Amherst, MA: Prometheus Books. (Scholar)
• McKeen, Catherine, 2006, “Gender, Choice and Partiality: A Defense of Rawls on the Family”, Essays in Philosophy, 7(1): 29–48. doi:10.5840/eip20067117 (Scholar)
• McKitrick, Jennifer, 2006, “Liberty, Gender, and the Family”, in Machan 2006: 83–103. (Scholar)
• Mendus, Susan, 1999, “The Importance of Love in Rawls’s Theory of Justice”, British Journal of Political Science, 29(1): 57–75. doi:10.1017/s0007123499000034 (Scholar)
• Mill, John Stuart, 1869 [1989], The Subjection of Women, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Minow, Martha, 1990, Making All the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Morse, Jennifer Roback, 1986, A Matter of Choice: A Critique of Comparable Worth by a Skeptical Feminist, New York: Priority Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, “No Families, No Freedom: Human Flourishing in a Free Society”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 16(1): 290–314. doi:10.1017/s0265052500002338 (Scholar)
• Nash, Kate, 1998, Universal Difference: Feminism and the Undecidability of “Women”, Basingstoke: Macmillan. (Scholar)
• Nussbaum, Martha C., 2003, “Rawls and Feminism”, in Freeman 2003: 488–520. doi:10.1017/ccol0521651670.015 (Scholar)
• Okin, Susan Moller, 2005, “‘Forty Acres and a Mule’ for Women: Rawls and Feminism”, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 4(2): 233–248. doi:10.1177/1470594x05052540 (Scholar)
• Phillips, Anne, 2001, “Feminism and Liberalism Revisited: Has Martha Nussbaum Got It Right?”, Constellations, 8(2): 249–266. doi:10.1111/1467-8675.00229 (Scholar)
• Posner, Richard A., 1989, “Conservative Feminism”, University of Chicago Legal Forum, 191: 209–217. (Scholar)
• Presley, Sharon, 1999, “Ayn Rand’s Philosophy of Individualism: A Feminist Psychologist’s Perspective”, in Gladstein and Schiabarra 1999: 251–274. (Scholar)
• Richardson, Janice, 2007, “On Not Making Ourselves the Prey of Others: Jean Hampton’s Feminist Contractarianism”, Feminist Legal Studies, 15(1): 33–55. doi:10.1007/s10691-006-9041-y (Scholar)
• Russell, J.S., 1995, “Okin’s Rawlsian Feminism?: Justice in the Family and Another Liberalism”, Social Theory and Practice, 21(3): 397–426. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract19952133 (Scholar)
• Schaeffer, Denise, 2001, “Feminism and Liberalism Reconsidered: The Case of Catharine MacKinnon”, American Political Science Review, 95(3): 699–708. doi:10.1017/s0003055401003082 (Scholar)
• Schwartz, Justin, 2001, “Rights of Inequality: Rawlsian Justice, Equal Opportunity, and the Status of the Family”, Legal Theory, 7(1): 83–117. doi:10.1017/s135232520107104x (Scholar)
• Smith, Andrew F., 2004, “Closer But Still No Cigar: On the Inadequacy of Rawls’s Reply to Okin’s ‘Political Liberalism, Justice, and Gender’”, Social Theory and Practice, 30(1): 59–71. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract20043012 (Scholar)
• Smith, G. W., 2000, “J. S. Mill on What We Don’t Know About Women”, Utilitas, 12(1): 41–61. doi:10.1017/s0953820800002600 (Scholar)
• Smith, Patricia, 1998, “Autonomy, Aspiration and Accomplishment: Some Steps and Barriers to Equality for Women”, Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 9: 257–278. (Scholar)
• Sommers, Christina Hoff, 2002, “The Case against Ratifying the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW)”, Government Testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, June 13, 2002, published by American Enterprise Institute. [Sommers 2002 available online] (Scholar)
• Spinner‐Halev, Jeff, 2001, “Feminism, Multiculturalism, Oppression, and the State”, Ethics, 112(1): 84–113. doi:10.1086/322741 (Scholar)
• Stafford, William, 2004, “Is Mill’s ‘Liberal’ Feminism ‘Masculinist’?”, Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(2): 159–179. doi:10.1080/13569310410001691190 (Scholar)
• Strossen, Nadine, 1991, “The American Civil Liberties Union and Women’s Rights”, New York University Law Review, 66(6): 1940–1961. (Scholar)
• Strossen, Nadine, 1993, “Fighting Big Sister for Liberty and Equality”, New York Law School Law Review, 38: 1–8. (Scholar)
• Taylor, Joan Kennedy, 1991, “Protective Labor Legislation”, in McElroy 1991a: 187–192. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993, Women’s Issues: Feminism, Classical Liberalism, and the Future, Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution. (Scholar)
• Thurschwell, Adam, 2008, “Radical Feminist Liberalism”, in Heberle and Pryor 2008: 31–58. (Scholar)
• Tong, Rosemarie, 1998a, “Liberal Feminism”, in Tong 1998c: 10–44. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998b, “Radical Feminism: Libertarian and Cultural Perspectives”, in Tong 1998c: 45–93. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998c, Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction, second edition, Boulder, CO: Westview. (Scholar)
• Tulloch, Gail, 1989, “Mill’s Epistemology in Practice in His Liberal Feminism”, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 21(2): 32–39. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.1989.tb00167.x (Scholar)
• Vaughn, Karen I., 1993, “Who Owns the Children? Libertarianism, Feminism, and Property”, Reason Papers 18: 189–200. (Scholar)
• Walker, John D., 1995, “Liberalism, Consent, and the Problem of Adaptive Preferences”:, Social Theory and Practice, 21(3): 457–471. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract19952135 (Scholar)
• Ward, Cynthia V., 1994, “A Kinder, Gentler Liberalism? Visions of Empathy in Feminist and Communitarian Literature”, The University of Chicago Law Review, 61(3): 929–955. doi:10.2307/1600171 (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, “Introduction: Reconstructing Liberalism”, William and Mary Law Review, 40(2): 719–721. (Scholar)
• Weiss, Michael and Cathy Young, 1996, “Feminist Jurisprudence: Equal Rights or Neo-Paternalism?” Policy Analysis, 256 (Cato Institute). (Scholar)
• Wendell, Susan, 1987, “A (Qualified) Defense of Liberal Feminism”, Hypatia, 2(2): 65–93. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1987.tb01066.x (Scholar)
• Wijze, Stephen de, 2000, “The Family and Political Justice: The Case for Political Liberalisms”, The Journal of Ethics, 4(3): 257–282. doi:10.1023/a:1009855117726 (Scholar)
• Williams, Joan, 2006, Opt Out or Forced Out? The Untold Story of Why Women Leave the Workforce, Berkeley, CA: The Center for WorkLife Law, University of California, Hastings College of Law. (Scholar)
• Wollstonecraft, Mary, 1792 [1998], A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, New York: Norton. (Scholar)
• Young, Cathy, 1999, Ceasefire: Why Women and Men Must Join Forces to Achieve True Equality, New York: The Free Press. (Scholar)