Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Feminist Perspectives on Science" by Sharon Crasnow
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
Sources Cited
- Alcoff, Linda and Elizabeth Potter (eds.), 1993, Feminist Epistemologies, New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203760093 (Scholar)
- Alter, Adam, Joshua Aronson, John M. Darley, Codaro Rodriguez,
Diane N. Ruble, 2010, “Rising to the Threat: Reducing Stereotype
Threat By Reframing It As a Challenge”, Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology 46(1): 166–171.
doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.014 (Scholar)
- Altmann, Jeanne, 1974, “Observatioinal Study of Behavior: Sampling Methods”, Behaviour, 49(3–4): 227–266. doi:10:1162/156853974X00534 (Scholar)
- American Association of University Women (AAUW), 2010, Why So
Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics,
Washington, DC: American Association of University Women. (Scholar)
- Anderson, Elizabeth, 1995a, “Feminist Epistemology: An Interpretation and a Defense”, Hypatia, 10(3): 50–84. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb00737.x (Scholar)
- –––, 1995b, “Knowledge, Human Interests, and Objectivity in Feminist Epistemology”:, Philosophical Topics, 23(2): 27–58. doi:10.5840/philtopics199523213 (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, “Uses of Value Judgments in
Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from a Case Study of
Feminist Research on Divorce”, Hypatia, 19(1):
1–24. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01266.x (Scholar)
- Bairey Merz, C. Noel, Holly Andersen, Emily Sprague, Adam Burns,
Mark Keida, Mary Norine Walsh, Phyllis Greenberger, Susan Campbell,
Irene Pollin, Cassandra McCullough, et al., 2017, “Knowledge,
Attitudes, and Beliefs Regarding Cardiovascular Disease in
Women”, Journal of the American College of Cardiology,
70(2): 123–132. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.024 (Scholar)
- Barad, Karen, 2007, Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning, Durham, NC: Duke University Press. (Scholar)
- Barker, Drucilla K., 1995, “Economists, Social Reformers,
and Prophets: A Feminist Critique of Economic Efficiency”,
Feminist Economics, 1(3): 26–39.
doi:10.1080/714042247 (Scholar)
- Barker, Drucilla K. and Edith Kuiper, 2003, Towards a Feminist Philosophy of Economics, London/New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- ––– , 2021, “Feminist Economics”, in
Crasnow and Kristen Intemann (eds.) 2021: 355–367. (Scholar)
- Baron-Cohen, Simon, 2003, The Essential Difference: Men, Women
and the Extreme Male Brain, London: Allen Lane. (Scholar)
- Bentley, Vanessa, 2021, “Feminism and Cognitive
Neuroscience”, in Crasnow and Intemann (eds.) 2021:
328–339. (Scholar)
- Bluhm, Robyn, 2021, “Neurosexism and Our Understanding of
Sex Differences in the Brain”, in Crasnow and Intemann (eds.)
2021: 316–327. (Scholar)
- Bluhm, Robyn, Anne Jaap Jacobson, and Heidi Lene Maibom (eds), 2012, Neurofeminism: Issues at the Intersection of Feminist Theory and Cognitive Science, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9780230368385 (Scholar)
- Bright, Liam Kofi, Daniel Malinsky, and Morgan Thompson, 2016, “Causally Interpreting Intersectionality Theory”, Philosophy of Science, 83(1): 60–81. doi:10.1086/684173 (Scholar)
- Brister, Evelyn, 2018, “Objectivity in Science”, in
Garavaso 2018: 212–235. (Scholar)
- Cipolla, Cyd, Kristina Gupta, David A. Rubin, and Angela Willey
(eds), 2017, Queer Feminist Science Studies: A Reader,
Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. (Scholar)
- Clough, Sharyn, 2003a, Beyond Epistemology: A Pragmatist Approach to Feminist Science Studies, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003b, “Introduction”, in
Siblings Under the Skin: Feminism, Social Justice and Analytic
Philosophy, Sharyn Clough (ed.), Aurora, CO: Davies Group
Publishers. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “Gender and the Hygiene Hypothesis”, Social Science & Medicine, 72(4): 486–493. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.021 (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “The Analytic Tradition, Radical (Feminist) Interpretation, and the Hygiene Hypothesis”, in Crasnow and Superson 2012: 405–434. (Scholar)
- Clough, Sharyn and William E. Loges, 2008, “Racist Value Judgments as Objectively False Beliefs: A Philosophical and Social-Psychological Analysis”, Journal of Social Philosophy, 39(1): 77–95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2007.00412.x (Scholar)
- Collins, Patricia Hill, 1986, “Learning from the Outsider
Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist
Thought”, Social Problems, 33(6): S14–S32.
doi:10.2307/800672 (Scholar)
- –––, 1990 [2000/2009], Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, Boston: Unwin Hyman. Second revised edition, New York: Routledge, 2000/Routledge Classics, 2009. (Scholar)
- Crasnow, Sharon, 2013, “Feminist Philosophy of Science: Values and Objectivity”, Philosophy Compass, 8(4): 413–423. doi:10.1111/phc3.12023 (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, “Feminist Standpoint Theory”, in Philosophy of Social Science: A New Introduction, Nancy Cartwright and Eleonora Montuschi (eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–161. (Scholar)
- Crasnow, Sharon L. and Anita M. Superson (eds), 2012, Out from the Shadows: Analytical Contributions to Traditional Philosophy, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199855469.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Crasnow, Sharon, Alison Wylie, Wenda K. Bauchspies, and Elizabeth
Potter, 2015 [2018], “Feminist Perspectives on Science”,
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018
Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/feminist-science/. (Scholar)
- Crasnow, Sharon and Kristen Intemann (eds.), 2021, The Routledge Handbook of Feminist Philosophy of Science, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Dalla Costa, Mariarosa and Selma James, 1972, The Power of
Women and the Subversion of Community, Bristol, UK: Falling Wall
Press. (Scholar)
- de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada, 2017, Rethinking Reprogenetics: Enhancing Ethical Analyses of Reprogenetic Technologies, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/med/9780190460204.001.0001 (Scholar)
- –––, 2021, “The Gendered Nature of
Reprogenetic Technologies”, in Crasnow and Intemann (eds.) 2021:
289–299. (Scholar)
- DeVault, Marjorie, 1999, Liberating Method: Feminism and Social Research, Philadephia, PA: Temple University Press. (Scholar)
- D’Ignazio, Catherine and Lauren F. Klein, 2020, Data Feminism, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. (Scholar)
- Doell, Ruth G. and Helen E. Longino, 1988, “Sex Hormones and
Human Behavior:: A Critique of the Linear Model”, Journal of
Homosexuality, 15(3–4): 55–78.
doi:10.1300/j082v15n03_03 (Scholar)
- Dotson, Kristie, 2011, “Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing”, Hypatia, 26(2): 236–257. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01177.x (Scholar)
- Dussauge, Isabelle and Anelis Kaiser, 2012, “Re-Queering the Brain”, in Bluhm, Jacobson, and Maibom 2012: 121–144. (Scholar)
- Eichler, Margrit and Jeanne Lapointe, 1985, On the Treatment
of the Sexes in Research, Ottawa, ON: Social Sciences and
Humanities Research Council of Canada. (Scholar)
- Elliott, Kevin C., 2017, A Tapestry of Values: An Introduction to Values in Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190260804.001.0001 (Scholar)
- –––, 2022, Values in Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Fausto-Sterling, Anne, 2000, Sexing the Body: Gender Politics
and the Construction of Sexuality, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
- Federici, Silvia, 1975 [2020], “Wages Against
Housework”, Bristol, UK: Power of Women Collective and the
Falling Wall Press. Reprinted in Revolution at Point Zero:
Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle, Oakland, CA: PM
Press, pp. 1–18. (Scholar)
- Fehr, Carla, 2011, “What Is in It for Me? The Benefits of Diversity in Scientific Communities”, in Grasswick 2011: 133–155. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_7">10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_7 (Scholar)
- Feng, Jing, Ian Spence, and Jay Pratt, 2007, “Playing an
Action Video Game Reduces Gender Difference in Spatial
Cognition”, Psychological Science, 10: 850–855.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01990.x (Scholar)
- Fine, Cordelia, 2010, Delusions of Gender: How our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference, New York: Norton. (Scholar)
- Fricker, Miranda, 2007, Epistemic Injustice: Power and the
Ethics of Knowing, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Garavaso, Pieranna (ed.), 2018, The Bloomsbury Companion to Analytic Feminism, London: Bloomsbury Academic. (Scholar)
- Grasswick, Heidi E. (ed.), 2011, Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science: Power in Knowledge, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5 (Scholar)
- Grossi, Giordana and Cordelia Fine, 2012, “The Role of Fetal
Testosterone in the Development of the ‘Essential
Differences’ Between the Sexes: Some Essential Issues”, in
Bluhm, Jacobson, and Maibom 2012: 73–104. (Scholar)
- Gupta, Kristina and David A. Rubin, 2021, “Queer Science
Studies/Queer Science”, in Crasnow and Intemann (eds.) 2021:
131–143. (Scholar)
- Haack, Susan, 1993, “Epistemological Reflections of an Old Feminist”, Reason Papers, 18: 31–43. [Haack 1993 available online] (Scholar)
- Haraway, Donna, 1992, “The Promises of Monsters: A
Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others”, in
Cultural Studies, Lawrence Grossberg, Cary Nelson, and Paula
Treichler (eds), New York: Routledge, pp. 295–337. (Scholar)
- Harding, Sandra, 1986, The Science Question in Feminism,
Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1987, “Is There a Feminist
Method?” in Feminism and Methodology: Social Science
Issues, Sandra Harding (ed.), Bloomington, IN: Indiana University
Press, pp. 1–14. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004a, “Rethinking Standpoint
Epistemology: What is ‘Strong Objectivity?’”, in
Harding (ed.) 2004c: 127–140. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004b, “A Socially Relevant Philosophy of Science? Resources from Standpoint Theory’s Controversiality”, Hypatia, 19(1): 25–47. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01267.x (Scholar)
- ––– (ed.), 2004c, The Feminist Standpoint
Theory Reader, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, 2015, Objectivity and Diversity: Another Logic of Scientific Research, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, “Latin American Decolonial Studies: Feminist Issues”, Feminist Studies, 43(3): 624–636. doi:10.15767/feministstudies.43.3.0624 (Scholar)
- –––, 2019, “State of the Field: Latin American Decolonial Philosophies of Science”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 78: 48–63. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.10.001 (Scholar)
- Harding, Sandra and Breny Mendoza. 2021, “Latin American
Decolonial Feminist Philosophy of Knowledge Production”, in
Crasnow and Intemann (eds.) 2021: 104–116. (Scholar)
- Himmelweit, Susan and Simon Mohun, 1977, “Domestic Labour
and Capital”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1(1):
15–31. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035348 (Scholar)
- Holman, Bennett and Torsten Wilholt, 2022, “The New Demarcation Problem,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 91: 211–220. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.11.011 (Scholar)
- Intemann, Kristen, 2009, “Why Diversity Matters: Understanding and Applying the Diversity Component of the National Science Foundation’s Broader Impacts Criterion”, Social Epistemology, 23(3–4): 249–266. doi:10.1080/02691720903364134 (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “25 Years of Feminist Empiricism and Standpoint Theory: Where Are We Now?”, Hypatia, 25(4): 778–796. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01138.x (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “Diversity and Dissent in
Science: Does Democracy Always Serve Feminist Aims?”, in
Grasswick 2011: 111–132. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_6 (Scholar)
- Johnson, Paula A., Sheila E. Widnall, and Frazier F. Benya, (eds),
2018,Sexual Harassment of Women Climate, Culture, and Consequences
in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2018),
Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. (Scholar)
- Jordan-Young, Rebecca, 2010, Brain Storm: The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– and Katrina Karkazis, (2019),
Testosterone: An Unauthorized Biography. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Keller, Evelyn Fox, 1985, Reflections on Gender and Science, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, “Making a Difference: Feminist
Movement and Feminist Critique of Science”, in Feminism in
Twentieth-Century Science, Technology, and Medicine, Angela N.H.
Creager, Elizabeth Lunbeck, and Londa Schiebinger (eds), Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, pp. 98–109. (Scholar)
- Kincaid, Harold, John Dupré, and Alison Wylie (eds), 2007, Value-Free Science? Ideals and Illusions, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195308969.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Kitcher, Philip, 1993, The Advancement of Science: Science
Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions, Oxford: Oxford
University Press. doi:10.1093/0195096533.001.0001 (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, Science, Truth, and
Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
doi:10.1093/0195145836.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Kourany, Janet A., 2010, Philosophy of Science after Feminism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732623.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Kuhn, Thomas S., 1962 [1970], The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1977, The Essential Tension: Selected
Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, Chicago: University
of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Lacey, Hugh, 1999, Is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding, New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203983195 (Scholar)
- Lloyd, Elisabeth A., 1995, “Objectivity and the Double Standard for Feminist Epistemologies”, Synthese, 104(3): 351–381. doi:10.1007/bf01064505 (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, The Case of the Female Orgasm:
Bias in the Science of Evolution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press. (Scholar)
- Longino, Helen E., 1990, Science as Social Knowledge, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, “Subjects, Power, and
Knowledge: Description and Prescription in Feminist Philosophies of
Science”, in Alcoff and Potter 1993: 101–120. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, Studying Human Behavior: How Scientists Investigate Aggression and Sexuality, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. (Scholar)
- Liu, S., Liu, P., Wang, M., & Zhang, B., 2021, Effectiveness
of Stereotype Threat Interventions: A Meta-analytic Review.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(6), 921–949.
doi:10.1037/apl0000770 (Scholar)
- Medina, José, 2013, The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and Resistant Imaginations, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199929023.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Merchant, Carolyn, 1980/90, The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution, New York: Harper and Row. (Scholar)
- Meynell, Letitia, 2012, “The Politics of Pictured Reality: Locating the Object from Nowhere in fMRI”, in Bluhm, Jacobson, and Maibom 2012: 11–29. (Scholar)
- Narayan, Uma, 2004, “The Project of Feminist Epistemology:
Perspectives from a Nonwestern Feminist”, in Harding (ed.)
2004c: 213–224. (Scholar)
- National Science Board, 2024, The State of U.S. Science and
Engineering 2024: Science and Engineering Indicationers
[National Science Board 2024 available online] (Scholar)
- Nelson, Lynn Hankinson, 1990, Who Knows: From Quine to a Feminist Empiricism, Philadelphia: Temple University Press. (Scholar)
- Oudshoorn, Nelly, 1994, Beyond the Natural Body: An Archaeology of Sex Hormones, London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203421529 (Scholar)
- Paxton, Pamela, 2000, “Women’s Suffrage in the
Measurement of Democracy: Problems of Operationalization”,
Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(3):
92–111. doi:10.1007/bf02699767 (Scholar)
- Pinnick, Cassandra L., 1994, “Feminist Epistemology: Implications for Philosophy of Science”, Philosophy of Science, 61(4): 646–657. doi:10.1086/289827 (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, “The Failed Feminist Challenge
to ‘Fundamental Epistemology’”, Science &
Education, 14(2): 103–116.
doi:10.1007/s11191-004-9515-8 (Scholar)
- Pitts-Taylor, Victoria, 2016a, The Brain’s Body:
Neuroscience and Corporeal Politics, Durham, NC: Duke University
Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016b, “Mattering: Feminism, Science, and Corporeal Politics”, in Pitts-Taylor 2016c: 1–20. (Scholar)
- ––– (ed.), 2016c, Mattering: Feminism, Science, and Materialism, New York: New York University Press. (Scholar)
- Porter, Theodore M., 1995, Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Richardson, Sarah S., 2012, “Sexing the X: How the X Became
the ‘Female Chromosome’”, Signs: Journal of
Women in Culture and Society, 37(4): 909–933.
doi:10.1086/664477 (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, Sex Itself: The Search for Male
and Female in the Human Genome, Chicago, IL: University of
Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Rolin, Kristina, 2006, “The Bias Paradox in Feminist Standpoint Epistemology”, Episteme, 3(1–2): 125–136. doi:10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.125 (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Standpoint Theory as a Methodology for the Study of Power Relations”, Hypatia, 24(4): 218–226. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01070.x (Scholar)
- Rossiter, Margaret, 1982, Women Scientists in America:
Struggles and Strategies to 1940, Baltimore, MD: Johns
Hopkins. (Scholar)
- –––1995, Women Scientists in America: Before
Affirmative Action, 1940–1972, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins
University Press.
- Roy, Deboleena and Banu Subramaniam, 2016, “Matter in the
Shadows: Feminist New Materialism and the Practices of
Colonialism”, in Pitts-Taylor 2016c: 23–42. (Scholar)
- Schiebinger, Londa, 1989, The Mind Has No Sex: Women in the
Origin of Modern Science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press. (Scholar)
- –––1999, Has Feminism Changed Science?
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Sent, Esther-Mirjam and Irene van Staveren, 2019, “A
Feminist Review of Behavioral Economic Research on Gender
Differences”, Feminist Economics, 25(2): 1–35.
doi:10.1080/13545701.2018.1532595 (Scholar)
- Smith, Dorothy E., 1987, The Everyday World as
Problematic, Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press. (Scholar)
- Solomon, Miriam, 2001, Social Empiricism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “The Web of Valief: An
Assessment of Feminist Radical Empiricism”, in Crasnow and
Superson 2012: 435–450. (Scholar)
- Spanier, Bonnie B., 1995, Im/Partial Science: Gender Ideology
in Molecular Biology, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University
Press. (Scholar)
- Sprague, Joey, 2016, Feminist Methodologies for Critical
Researchers: Bridging Differences, Lanham, MD: Rowman &
Littlefield Publishers. (Scholar)
- Stacey, Judith and Barrie Thorne, 1985, “The Missing
Feminist Revolution in Sociology”, Social Problems,
32(4): 301–316. doi:10.2307/800754 (Scholar)
- Steele, Claude M., 1997, “A Threat in the Air: How
Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance,”,
American Psychologist, 52(6): 613–629.
doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.6.613 (Scholar)
- Stewart, Abigail J., Anne P. Copeland, Nia Lane Chester, Janet E.
Malley, and Nicole B. Barenbaum, 1997, Separating Together: How
Divorce Transforms Families, New York: Guilford Press (Scholar)
- Toole, Briana, 2024, “Standpoint Epistemology and Epistemic Peerhood: A Defense of Epistemic Privilege”, Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 2024: 409–226. doi:10.1017/apa.2023.6 (Scholar)
- Valian, Vivian, 1999, Why So Slow? The Advancement of
Women, Cambridge MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- van Anders, Sari. M. (2015). Beyond sexual orientation:
Integrating gender/sex and diverse sexualities via sexual
configurations theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44:
1177–1213. (Scholar)
- van Anders, Sari M., Jeffrey Steiger, and Katherine L. Goldey,
2015, “Effects of Gendered Behavior on Testosterone in Women and
Men”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
112(45): 13805–13810. doi:10.1073/pnas.1509591112 (Scholar)
- Wallerstein, Judith and Joan Kelly, 1980, Surviving the
Breakup, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
- Watkins, Aja and DiMarco, Marina. 2025. “Sex Eliminativism,”
Biology & Philosphy, 40(2): 1–30.
doi:10.1007/s10539-024-09972-y (Scholar)
- Wylie, Alison, 2003, “Why Standpoint Matters”, in Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology, Robert Figueroa and Sandra Harding (eds), New York: Routledge, pp. 26–48. (Scholar)
- Wylie, Alison, Elizabeth Potter, and Wenda K. Bauchspies, 2010, “Feminist Perspectives on Science”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/feminist-science/. (Scholar)
- Yap, Audrey, 2016, “Feminist Radical Empiricism, Values, and Evidence”, Hypatia, 31(1): 58–73. doi:10.1111/hypa.12221 (Scholar)
Additional Readings
- Almassi, Ben, 2019, “Beyond Science Wars Redux: Feminist Philosophy of Science as Trustworthy Science Criticism”, Hypatia, 34(4): 858–868. doi:10.1111/hypa.12500 (Scholar)
- Amoretti, Maria Cristina and Nicla Vassallo (eds), 2016, Meta-Philosophical Reflection on Feminist Philosophies of Science, (Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science 317), Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26348-9 (Scholar)
- Blizzard, Deborah, 2007, Looking Within: A Socio-cultural
Examination of Fetoscopy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Bueter, Anke, 2024, Feminist Philosophy of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Bug, Amy, 2003, “Has Feminism Changed Physics?”,
Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3):
881–899. doi:10.1086/345323 (Scholar)
- Campion, Patricia and Wesley Shrum, 2004, “Gender and Science in Development: Women Scientists in Ghana, Kenya, and India”, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(4): 459–485. doi:10.1177/0162243904265895 (Scholar)
- Code, Lorraine, 1993, “Taking Subjectivity into
Account”, in Alcoff and Potter 1993: 15–48. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, What Can She Know? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- Crasnow, Sharon, 2018, “Contemporary Standpoint Theory:
Tensions, Integrations, and Extensions”, in Garavaso 2018:
188–211. (Scholar)
- Crasnow, Sharon and Kristen Intemann, 2024, Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science: An Introduction, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Ebbersmeyer, Sabrina and Gianni Paganini (eds.), 2020, Women,
Philosophy and Science: Italy and Early Modern Europe, (Women in
the History of Philosophy and Sciences 4), Cham: Springer
International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44548-5 (Scholar)
- Elliott, Kevin C. and Daniel Steel (eds.), 2017, Current Controversies in Values and Science, New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315639420 (Scholar)
- Fausto-Sterling, Anne, 1985, Myths of Gender: Biological
Theories About Women and Men, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
- Fedigan, Linda Marie, 1986, “The Changing Role of Women in
Models of Human Evolution”, Annual Review of
Anthropology, 15(1): 25–66.
doi:10.1146/annurev.an.15.100186.000325 (Scholar)
- Fedigan, Linda Marie and Laurence Fedigan, 1989, “Gender and
the Study of Primates”, in Gender and Anthropology: Critical
Reviews for Research and Teaching, Sandra Morgen (ed.),
Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association, pp.
41–64. (Scholar)
- Fonow, Mary Margaret and Judith A. Cook, 2005, “Feminist
Methodology: New Applications in the Academy and Public Policy”,
Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(4):
2211–2236. doi:10.1086/428417 (Scholar)
- Fortmann, Louise (ed.), 2008, Participatory Research in
Conservation and Rural Livelihoods: Doing Science Together,
London: Wiley-Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Fujimura, Joan H., 2006, “Sex Genes: A Critical
Sociomaterial Approach to the Politics and Molecular Genetics of Sex
Determination”, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and
Society, 32(1): 49–82. doi:10.1086/505612 (Scholar)
- Garry, Ann, Serene J. Khader, and Alison Stone (eds.), 2017, The Routledge Companion to Feminist Philosophy, New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315758152 (Scholar)
- Good, Jessica Julie A. Woodzicka, and Lylan C. Wingfield, 2010,
“The Effects of Gender Stereotypic and Counter-Stereotypic Textbook
Images on Science Performance”, The Journal of Social
Psychology, 150(2): 132–147.
doi:10.1080/00224540903366552 (Scholar)
- Hall, Kim Q., 2017, “Feminist and Queer Intersections with
Disability Studies”, in Garry, Khader, and Stone 2017:
405–418. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, “Feminism, Disability, and
Embodiment”, NWSA Journal, Special Issue: Feminist
Disability Studies, 14(3): vii–xii.
doi:10.1353/nwsa.2003.0006 (Scholar)
- Hammonds, Evelynn and Banu Subramaniam, 2003, “A
Conversation on Feminist Science Studies”, Signs: Journal of
Women in Culture and Society, 28(3): 923–944.
doi:10.1086/345455 (Scholar)
- Haraway, Donna, 1989, Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and
Nature in the World of Modern Science, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York, Routledge. (Scholar)
- Harding, Sandra, 1991, Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, The “Racial” Economy
of Science: Toward a Democratic Future, Bloomington, IN: Indiana
University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (ed.), 2006, Science and Social Inequality: Feminist and Postcolonial Issues, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press. (Scholar)
- Harding, Sandra and Kathryn Norberg, 2005, “New Feminist
Approaches to Social Science Methodologies: An Introduction”,
Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(4):
2009–2015. doi:10.1086/428420 (Scholar)
- Hastorf, Christine A., 1991, “Gender, Space, and Food in
Prehistory”, in Engendering Archaeology: Women and
Prehistory, Joan M. Gero and Margaret W. Conkey (eds.), Oxford:
Blackwell, 132–159. (Scholar)
- Hesse-Biber, Sharlene (ed.), 2011, Handbook of Feminist
Research, second edition, New York: Sage. (Scholar)
- Hesse-Biber, Sharlene and Michelle L. Yaiser, 2004, Feminist Perspectives on Social Research, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Hubbard, Ruth, 2003, “Science, Power, Gender: How DNA Became
the Book of Life”, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and
Society, 28(3): 791–799. doi:10.1086/345334 (Scholar)
- –––, 1990, The Politics of Women’s
Biology, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. (Scholar)
- Kafer, Alison, 2003, “Compulsory Bodies: Reflections on
Heterosexuality and Able- bodiedness”, Journal of
Women’s History, 15(3): 77–89 (Scholar)
- Keller, Evelyn Fox, 1983, A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock, New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992, Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death: Essays on Language, Gender and Science, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995, “The Origin, History, and
Politics of the Subject Called ‘Gender and Science’: A
First Person Account”, in Handbook of Science and Technology
Studies, Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Petersen,
and Trevor Pinch (eds.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications,
80–94. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, The Mirage of a Space Between Nature and Nurture, Durham, NC: Duke University Press. (Scholar)
- Kittay, Eva, Anita Silvers, and Susan Wendell (eds.), 2001,
Feminism and Disability, Special Issue of Hypatia,
16(4). (Scholar)
- Kourany, Janet, 2017, “Philosophy of Science and the
Feminist Legacy”, in Garry, Khader, and Stone 2017:
303–313. (Scholar)
- Lloyd, Elisabeth A., 1993, “Pre-Theoretical Assumptions in Evolutionary Explanations of Female Sexuality”, Philosophical Studies, 69(2–3): 139–153. doi:10.1007/bf00990080 (Scholar)
- Longino, Helen E., 1995, “Gender, Politics, and the Theoretical Virtues”, Synthese, 104(3): 383–397. doi:10.1007/bf01064506 (Scholar)
- Longino, Helen and Ruth Doell, 1983, “Body, Bias, and
Behavior: A Comparative Analysis of Reasoning in Two Areas of
Biological Science”, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and
Society, 9(2): 206–227. doi:10.1086/494044 (Scholar)
- Meynell, Letitia, 2012, “Evolutionary Psychology, Ethology, and Essentialism (Because What They Don’t Know Can Hurt Us)”, Hypatia, 27(1): 3–27. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01240.x (Scholar)
- –––, 2021, “What’s Wrong with
(Narrow) Evolutionary Psychology” in Crasnow and Intemann (eds.)
2021: 303–315. (Scholar)
- MIT, Committee on Women Faculty in the School of Science, 1999,
“A Study on the Status of Women Faculty in Science at
MIT”, The MIT Faculty Newsletter, 11(4).
[MIT 1999 available online] (Scholar)
- Nelson, Lynn Hankinson, 1995, “A Feminist Naturalized Philosophy of Science”, Synthese, 104(3): 399–421. doi:10.1007/bf01064507 (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, Biology and Feminism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2018, “Feminist Philosophies of
Science: The Social and Contextual Nature of Science”, in
Garavaso 2018: 236–259. (Scholar)
- –––, 2021, “Feminist Philosophy of
Biology”, in Crasnow and Intemann (eds.) 2021: 263–274. (Scholar)
- Newcombe, Nora S., 2010, “On Tending to Our Scientific
Knitting: Thinking About Gender in the Context of Evolution”, in
Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology, Volume 1: Gender
Research in General and Experimental Psychology, Joan C. Chrisler
and Donald R. McCreary (eds.), New York, NY: Springer New York,
259–274. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_13 (Scholar)
- Pohlhaus, Gaile, 2002, “Knowing Communities: An Investigation of Harding’s Standpoint Epistemology”, Social Epistemology, 16(3): 283–293. doi:10.1080/0269172022000025633 (Scholar)
- Pérez Sedeño, E., 2001, “Gender: The Missing
Factor in STS”, in Visions of STS: Counterpoints in Science,
Technology and Society Studies, Stephen H. Cutcliffe and Carl
Mitcham (eds.), Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 123–138. (Scholar)
- Ramazanoglu, Caroline with Janet Holland, 2002, Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. (Scholar)
- Reardon, Jenny, 2005, Race to the Finish: Identity and
Governance in an Age of Genomics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press. (Scholar)
- Reinharz, Shulamit, 1992, Feminist Methods in Social Research, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Richardson, Sarah S., 2010, “Feminist Philosophy of Science: History, Contributions, and Challenges”, Synthese, 177(3): 337–362. doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9791-6 (Scholar)
- Rose, Hilary, 1983, “Hand, Brain, and Heart: A Feminist
Epistemology for the Natural Sciences”, Signs: Journal of
Women in Culture and Society, 9(1): 73–90.
doi:10.1086/494025 (Scholar)
- –––, 1994, Love, Power and Knowledge:
Towards a Feminist Transformation of the Sciences, Cambridge, MA:
Polity Press. (Scholar)
- Rosser, Sue V., 2002, “Twenty-five Years of NWSA: Have We
Built the Two-Way Streets Between Women’s Studies and Women in
Science and Technology?” NWSA Journal, 14(1):
103–128. doi: 10.1353/nwsa.2002.0017 (Scholar)
- Roughgarden, Joan, 2013, Evolution’s Rainbow: Diversity,
Gender, and Sexuality in Nature and People, Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Schiebinger, Londa, 1999, “How Women Contribute”,
Science, 285(5429): 835b–8835.
doi:10.1126/science.285.5429.835b (Scholar)
- ––– (ed.), 2003, Gender and Science: New
Issues, special issue of Signs: Journal of Women in Culture
and Society, 28(3). (Scholar)
- Smith, Dorothy E., 1974, “Women’s Perspective as a
Radical Critique of Sociology”, Sociological Inquiry,
44(1): 7–13. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682x.1974.tb00718.x (Scholar)
- Smith, Dorothy E., 1978, “A Peculiar Eclipsing:
Women’s Exclusion from Man’s Culture”,
Women’s Studies International Quarterly, 1(4):
281–295. doi:10.1016/s0148-0685(78)91175-2 (Scholar)
- Sonnert, Gerhard and Gerald Holton, 1995, Who Succeeds in
Science? The Gender Dimension, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers
University Press. (Scholar)
- Sperling, Susan, 1991, “Baboons with Briefcases: Feminism,
Functionalism, and Sociobiology in the Evolution of Primate
Gender”, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and
Society, 17(1): 1–27. doi:10.1086/494711 (Scholar)
- Squier, Susan and Melissa M. Littlefield, 2004, “Feminist Theory and/of Science: Feminist Theory Special Issue”, Feminist Theory, 5(2): 123–126. doi:10.1177/1464700104045403 (Scholar)
- Strum, Shirley C. and Linda Marie Fedigan (eds.), 2000, Primate Encounters: Models of Science, Gender, and Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Suchman, Lucy, 2008, “Feminist STS and the Sciences of the
Artificial”, in The Handbook of Science and Technology
Studies, third edition, Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska,
Michael E. Lynch, and Judy Wajcman (eds.), Cambridge, Massachusetts
and London: The MIT Press, pp. 139–164. (Scholar)
- Symons, Donald, 1979, The Evolution of Human Sexuality
New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Tejani, Sheba, 2019, “What’s Feminist about Feminist
Economics?”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 26(2):
99–117. doi:10.1080/1350178x.2018.1556799 (Scholar)
- Watson, Patty Jo and Mary C. Kennedy, 1991, “The Development
of Horticulture in the Eastern Woodlands of North America:
Women’s Role”, in Engendering Archaeology: Women and
Prehistory, Joan M. Gero and Margaret W. Conkey (eds.), Oxford:
Blackwell, 276–300. (Scholar)
- Whelan, Emma, 2001, “Politics by Other Means: Feminism and
Mainstream Science Studies”, Canadian Journal of Sociology /
Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 26(4): 535–581.
doi:10.2307/3341492 (Scholar)
- Wyer, Mary, Mary Barbercheck, Donna Cookmeyer, Hatice
Öztürk, and Marta Wayne (eds), 2014, Women, Science and
Technology: A Reader in Feminist Science Studies, third edition,
New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203427415 (Scholar)
- Wylie, Alison, 1995, “The Contexts of Activism on
‘Climate’ Issues”, in Breaking Anonymity: The
Chilly Climate for Women Faculty, The Chilly Collective (eds.),
Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, pp.
26–60. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, “The Feminism Question in
Science: What Does It Mean to ‘Do Social Science as a
Feminist’?”, in Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory
and Praxis, Sharlene Hesse-Biber (ed.), New York: Sage, pp.
567–577. doi:10.4135/9781483384740.n26 (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, “What Knowers Know Well:
Standpoint Theory and the Formation of Gender Archaeology”,
Scientiae Studia, 15(1): 13–38. (Scholar)
- Wylie, Alison, Janet R. Jakobsen, and Gisela Fosado, 2008,
Women, Work, and the Academy: Strategies for Responding to
‘Post-civil Rights Era’ Gender Discrimination, (New
Feminist Solutions, 2), New York: Barnard Center for Research on Women
[Wylie, Jakobsen, and Fosado 2008 available online]. (Scholar)