Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Gottlob Frege" by Edward N. Zalta

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

A. Primary Sources

Frege’s Complete Corpus

Chronological Catalog of Frege’s Work

Works by Frege Cited in this Entry

Two useful source books for translations of Frege’s Writings are:

  • P. Geach and M. Black (eds. and trans.), 1980, Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Oxford: Blackwell, third edition. (Scholar)
  • B. McGuinness (ed.), 1984, Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)

Many of the works listed below are translated and collected in the above.

1873 Über eine geometrische Darstellung der imaginären Gebilde in der Ebene, Inaugural-Dissertation der Philosophischen Fakultät zu Göttingen zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde, Jena: A. Neuenhann, 1873; translated by H. Kaal, On a Geometrical Representation of the Imaginary Forms in the Plane, in McGuinness (ed.) 1984, pp. 1–55.
1874 Rechnungsmethoden, die sich auf eine Erweiterung des Grössenbegriffes gründen, Dissertation zur Erlangung der Venia Docendi bei der Philosophischen Fakultät in Jena, Jena: Friedrich Frommann, 1874; translation by H. Kaal, Methods of Calculation based on an Extension of the Concept of Quantity, in McGuinness (ed.) 1984, pp. 56–92.
1879 Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens, Halle a. S.: Louis Nebert; translated as Concept Script, a formal language of pure thought modelled upon that of arithmetic, by S. Bauer-Mengelberg in J. van Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967.
1882 ‘Über den Zweck der Begriffsschrift’, Jenaische Zeitschrift für Naturwissenschaft (Supplement), 16: 1–10; translated by V. Dudman as ‘On the Purpose of the Begriffsschrift’, The Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 46/2 (1968): 89–97. (Also translated in T. Bynum (ed., trans.), Conceptual Notation and Related Articles, Oxford: Clarendon, 1972.)
1884 Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: eine logisch mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl, Breslau: W. Koebner; translated as The Foundations of Arithmetic: A logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of number, by J.L. Austin, Oxford: Blackwell, second revised edition, 1953.
1891 ‘Funktion und Begriff’, Vortrag, gehalten in der Sitzung vom 9. Januar 1891 der Jenaischen Gesellschaft für Medizin und Naturwissenschaft, Jena: Hermann Pohle; translated as ‘Function and Concept’ by P. Geach in Geach and Black (eds. and trans.) 1980, 21–41.
1892a ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’, in Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100: 25–50; translated as ‘On Sense and Reference’ by M. Black in Geach and Black (eds. and trans.), 1980, 56–78.
1892b ‘Über Begriff und Gegenstand’, in Vierteljahresschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie, 16: 192–205; translated as ‘Concept and Object’ by P. Geach in Geach and Black (eds. and trans.) 1980, 42–55.
1893/1903 Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, Jena: Verlag Hermann Pohle, Band I/II. Complete translation by P. Ebert and M. Rossberg (with C. Wright) as Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Derived using concept-script, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Partial translation of Volume I, The Basic Laws of Arithmetic, by M. Furth, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1964.
1903b ‘Über die Grundlagen der Geometrie’, Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 12 (1903): 319–324 (Part I), 368–375 (Part II); translated ‘On the Foundations of Geometry’ (First Series), by E.-H. W. Kluge, in McGuinness (ed.) 1984, pp. 273–284.
1904 ‘Was ist eine Funktion?’, in Festschrift Ludwig Boltzmann gewidmet zum sechzigsten Geburtstage, 20. Februar 1904, S. Meyer (ed.), Leipzig: Barth, 1904, pp. 656–666; translated as ‘What is a Function?’ by P. Geach in Geach and Black (eds. and trans.) 1980, 107–116.
1906 ‘Über die Grundlagen der Geometrie’, Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 15: 293–309 (Part I), 377–403 (Part II), 423–430 (Part III); translated as ‘On the Foundations of Geometry’ (Second Series), by E.-H. W. Kluge, in On the Foundations of Geometry and Formal Theories of Arithmetic, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971; reprinted in B. McGuinness (ed.) 1984, 293–340.
1918a ‘Der Gedanke. Eine Logische Untersuchung’, Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, I (1918–1919): 58–77; translated as ‘Thoughts’, by P. Geach and R. Stoothoff, in McGuinness (ed.) 1984, pp. 351–372.
1918b ‘Die Verneinung. Eine Logische Untersuchung’, Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, I (1919): 143–157; translated as ‘Negation’, by P. Geach and R. Stoothoff, in McGuinness (ed.), 1984, pp. 373–389.
1923 ‘Logische Untersuchungen. Dritter Teil: Gedankengefüge’, Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, III (1923–1926): 36–51; translated as ‘Compound Thoughts’, by P. Geach and R. Stoothoff, in McGuinness (ed.) 1984, pp. 390–406.
1924 [Diary], G. Gabriel and W. Kienzler (eds.), ‘Diary: Written by Professor Gottlob Frege in the Time from 10 March to 9 April 1924’, R. Mendelsohn (trans.), Inquiry, 39 (1996): 303–342.

B. Secondary Sources

  • Anderson, D., and Zalta, E., 2004, “Frege, Boolos, and Logical Objects”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 33(1): 1–26. (Scholar)
  • Angelelli, I., 1967, Studies on Gottlob Frege and Traditional Philosophy, Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
  • Antonelli, A., and May, R., 2005, “Frege’s Other Program”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 46(1): 1–17. (Scholar)
  • Beaney, M., 1996, Frege: Making Sense, London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1997, The Frege Reader, Oxford: Blackwell (Scholar)
  • Bell, D., 1979, Frege’s Theory of Judgment, Oxford: Clarendon. (Scholar)
  • Blanchette, P., 2012, Frege’s Conception of Logic, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Bobzien, S., 2021, “Frege Plagiarized the Stoics”, in Fiona Leigh (ed.), Themes in Plato, Aristotle, and Hellenistic Philosophy: Keeling Lectures 2011–18, London: University of London Press, 2021, pp. 149–219. (Scholar)
  • Bochenski, Joseph M., 1956, Formale Logic, Freiburg: Karl Albe; second edition, 1962. (Scholar)
  • Bolzano, B., 1817, “Rein analytischer Beweis des Lehrsatzes”, in Early Mathematical Works (1781–1848), L. Novy (ed.), Institute of Czechoslovak and General History CSAS, Prague, 1981; translated in S. Russ (ed.), The Mathematical Works of Bernard Bolzano, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Boolos, G., 1985, “Reading the Begriffsschrift”, Mind, 94: 331–344; reprinted in Boolos (1998): 155–170. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1986, “Saving Frege From Contradiction”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 87: 137–151. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1987, “The Consistency of Frege’s Foundations of Arithmetic”, in J. Thomson (ed.), On Being and Saying, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 3–20. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1990, “The Standard of Equality of Numbers”, in G. Boolos (ed.), Meaning and Method: Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 261–77. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1995, “Frege’s Theorem and the Peano Postulates”, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 1: 317–26. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1997, “Is Hume’s Principle Analytic?”, in Heck (ed.) 1997, 245–262; reprinted in Boolos 1998: 301–314. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1998, Logic, Logic, and Logic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Burgess, J., 1998, “On a Consistent Subsystem of Frege’s Grundgesetze”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 39: 274–278. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005, Fixing Frege, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
  • Coffa, J.A., 1991, The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap, L. Wessels (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Cook, R., 2013, “How to Read Frege’s Grundgesetze”, Appendix to Volume 2 of the Ebert & Rossberg translation of Frege 1893/1903. (Scholar)
  • Currie, G., 1982, Frege: An Introduction to His Philosophy, Brighton, Sussex: Harvester Press. (Scholar)
  • Demopoulos, W. (ed.), 1995, Frege’s Philosophy of Mathematics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Diogenes Laertius, 2nd century CE, Lives of the Philosophers (Vitae Philsophorum), 2 volumes, M. Marcovich (ed.), Stuttgart & Leipzig: Teubner, 1999.
  • Dummett, M., 1973, Frege: Philosophy of Language, London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1981, The Interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1991, Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Ferreira, F., 2005, “Amending Frege’s Grundgesetze der Arithmetik”, Synthese, 147: 3–19. (Scholar)
  • Ferreira, F., and K. Wehmeier, 2002, “On the Consistency of the \(\Delta^1_1\)-CA Fragment of Frege’s Grundgesetze”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 31: 303–311. (Scholar)
  • Fine, K., 2002, The Limits of Abstraction, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • Furth, M., 1967, “Editor’s Introduction”, in G. Frege, The Basic Laws of Arithmetic, M. Furth (translator and editor), Berkeley: University of California Press, v–lvii (Scholar)
  • Gabriel, G., K. Hülser, and S. Schlotter, 2009, “Zur Miete bei Frege – Rudolf Hirzel und die Rezeption der stoischen Logik und Semantik in Jena,” History and Philosophy of Logic, 30(4): 369–88. (Scholar)
  • Goldfarb, W., 2001, “Frege’s Conception of Logic”, in J. Floyd and S. Shieh (eds.), Future Pasts: The Analytic Tradition in Twentieth-Century Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 25–41. (Scholar)
  • Haaparanta, L., and Hintikka, J. (eds.), 1986, Frege Synthesized, Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
  • Heck, R., 1993, “The Development of Arithmetic in Frege’s Grundgesetze der Arithmetik”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 58(2): 579–601. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1996, “The Consistency of Predicative Fragments of Frege’s Grundgesetze der Arithmetik”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 17: 209–220. (Scholar)
  • Heck, R., and R. May, 2006, “Frege’s Contribution to Philosophy of Language”, in E. Lepore and B. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Heijenoort, Jean van, 1967, “Logic as Calculus and Logic as Language”, Synthese, 17: 324–30. (Scholar)
  • Hodges, W., 2001, “Formal Features of Compositionality”, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 10: 7–28. (Scholar)
  • Kant, I., 1781 [1787], Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch, 1st edition (A), 1781; 2nd edition (B), 1787; translated as Critique of Pure Reason by P. Guyer and A. Wood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1800, Logik: ein Handbuch zu Vorlesungen, G.B. Jäsche (ed.), Königsberg: Friedrich Ricolovius; translated as Logic, by R.S. Hartman and W. Schwarz, New York: Dover Publications, 1974; translation (‘The Jasche Logic’) also by J. Michael Young, Immanuel Kant: Lectures on Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. (Scholar)
  • Klemke, E. D. (ed.), 1968, Essays on Frege, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. (Scholar)
  • Kneale, W. and M. Kneale, 1962, The Development of Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Kratzsch, I., 1979, “Material zu Leben und Wirken Freges aus dem Besitz der Universitäts-bibliothek Jena”, in Begriffsschrift – Jenaer Frege-Konferenz (May 7–11, 1979), Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, 534–46. (Scholar)
  • Kreiser, L., 1984, “G. Frege ‘Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik’ – Werk und Geschichte”, in G. Wechsung (ed.), Frege Conference 1984 (Proceedings of the International Conference Held at Schwerin, GDR, September 10–14, 1984), Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 13–27. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1997, “Alfred,” in G. Gabriel and W. Kienzler (eds.), Frege in Jena: Beiträge zur Spurensicherung, Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, pp. 68–83. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2001, Gottlob Frege: Leben, Werk, Zeit, Hamburg: Meiner. (Scholar)
  • Linnebo, Øystein, 2003, “Frege’s Conception of Logic: From Kant to Grundgesetze”, Manuscrito, 26(2): 235–252. (Scholar)
  • Łukasiewicz, J., 1935, “Zur Geschichte der Aussagenlogik,” Erkenntnis, 5: 111–131; this is a German translation, by the author, of his original paper, “Z historii logiki zdań,” Przegląd Filozoficzny, 37 (1934): 417–37; English translation, “On the history of the logic of propositions,” by Storrs McCall, in Polish Logic: 1920–1939, Storrs McCall (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 66–87. (Scholar)
  • MacFarlane, J., 2002, “Frege, Kant, and the Logic in Logicism”, Philosophical Review, 111(1): 25–66. (Scholar)
  • Mates, B., 1961, Stoic Logic, Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press; first edition, 1953. (Scholar)
  • May, R., 2006a, “Frege on Indexicals”, The Philosophical Review, 115: 487–516. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2006b, “The Invariance of Sense”, The Journal of Philosophy, 103: 111–144. (Scholar)
  • Mendelsohn, R., 2005, The Philosophy of Gottlob Frege, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Parsons, C., 1965, “Frege’s Theory of Number”, in M. Black (ed.), Philosophy in America, Ithaca: Cornell, 180–203. (Scholar)
  • Parsons, T., 1981, “Frege’s Hierarchies of Indirect Senses and the Paradox of Analysis”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy: VI, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 37–57. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1982, “Fregean Theories of Fictional Objects”, Topoi, 1: 81–87. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1987, “On the Consistency of the First-Order Portion of Frege’s Logical System”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 28(1): 161–168. (Scholar)
  • Pelletier, F.J., 2001, “Did Frege Believe Frege’s Principle”, Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 10(1): 87–114. (Scholar)
  • Perry, J., 1977, “Frege on Demonstratives”, Philosophical Review, 86: 474–497. (Scholar)
  • Prantl, Carl, 1855–1870, “Die Stoiker” (Volume 1, Section VI), in Prantl’s 4 volume, Geschichte der Logik im Abendland, Leipzig: Verlag von S. Hirzel, pp. 401–496. (Scholar)
  • Reck, E., and Awodey, S. (eds. and trans.), 2004, Frege’s Lectures on Logic: Carnap’s Student Notes, 1910–1914, Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court. (Scholar)
  • Resnik, M., 1980, Frege and the Philosophy of Mathematics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
  • Ricketts, T., 1997, “Truth-Values and Courses-of-Value in Frege’s Grundgesetze”, in Early Analytic Philosophy, W. Tait (ed.), Chicago: Open Court, 187–211. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1996, “Logic and Truth in Frege”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary Volume) 70: 121–140. (Scholar)
  • Ricketts, T. and M. Potter (eds.), 2010, Cambridge Companion to Frege, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Salmon, N., 1986, Frege’s Puzzle, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Schirn, M. (ed.), 1996, Frege: Importance and Legacy, Berlin: de Gruyter. (Scholar)
  • Sluga, H., 1980, Gottlob Frege, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
  • ––– (ed.), 1993, The Philosophy of Frege, New York: Garland, four volumes. (Scholar)
  • Smiley, T., 1981, “Frege and Russell”, Epistemologica, 4: 53–8. (Scholar)
  • Steinberger, F., 2017, “Frege and Carnap on the Normativity of Logic”, Synthese, 194(1): 143–162. (Scholar)
  • Tappenden, J., 2006, “The Riemannian Background to Frege’s Philosophy”, in The Architecture of Modern Mathematics: Essays in History and Philosophy, J. Ferreirós and J. Gray (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97–132. (Scholar)
  • Taschek, W., 2008, “Truth, Assertion, and the Horizontal: Frege on ‘the essence of logic’ ”, Mind, 117: 375–401. (Scholar)
  • Tolley, C., 2008, “Kant and the normativity of logic”, in V. Rohden, R. Terra, G. de Almeida, & M. Ruffing (eds.), Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants: Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses (Volume 5), Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 215–227. (Scholar)
  • Veraart, Albert, 1976, “Geschichte des wissenschaftlichen Nachlasses Gottlob Freges und seiner Edition,” in M. Schirn (ed.), Studien zu Frege I, Stuttgart – Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, pp. 49–106. (See especially Section 5, “Zum Verbleib des übrigen Nachlasses”, pp. 82–84.) (Scholar)
  • Wilson, M., 1992, “Frege: The Royal Road from Geometry”, Noûs, 26: 149–80; reprinted with a new Postscript in Demopoulos 1995, 108–159. (Scholar)
  • Wehmeier, K., 1999, “Consistent Fragments of Grundgesetze and the Existence of Non-Logical Objects”, Synthese, 121: 309–328. (Scholar)
  • Wehmeier, K., and H.-C. Schmidt am Busch, 2000 [2005], “The Quest for Frege’s Nachlass”, in Michael Beaney and Erich Reck (eds.), Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers: Gottlob Frege (Volume I), London: Routledge, 2005, pp. 54–68; translated by the authors from “Auf der Suche nach Freges Nachlaß”, in G. Gabriel and U. Dathe (eds.), Gottlob Frege – Werk und Wirkung, Paderborn: mentis Verlag, 2000, 267–281. (Scholar)
  • Weierstrass, K., 1872, “Über continuirliche Functionen eines reellen Arguments, die für keinen Werth des letzeren einen bestimmten Differentialquotienten besitzen,” in Mathematische Werke von Karl Weierstrass (Volume II), Berlin, Germany: Mayer & Mueller, 1895 pages 71–74; English translation: “On continuous functions of a real argument that do not possess a well-defined derivative for any value of their argument”, in G.A. Edgar, Classics on Fractals, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1993, 3–9. (Scholar)
  • Wright, C., 1983, Frege’s Conception of Numbers as Objects, Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999, “Is Hume’s Principle Analytic,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 40(1): 6–30. (Scholar)

Generated Sun May 15 10:29:54 2022