Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Gene" by Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, Staffan Müller-Wille and Robert Meunier

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

  • Allen, Garland, 1986. “T. H. Morgan and the split between embryology and genetics, 1910-1926,” in T. Horder, I. A. Witkowski, and C. C. Wylie (eds.), A History of Embryology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002. “The classical gene: its nature and its legacy,” in L. S. Parker and R. A. Ankeny (eds.), Mutating concepts, evolving disciplines: genetics, medicine and society, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Scholar)
  • Baetu, T.M., 2012. “Genes after the human genome project,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43: 191–201. (Scholar)
  • Bateson, William, 1902. Mendel's Principles of Heredity: A Defence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Beurton, Peter, 2000. “A unified view of the gene, or how to overcome reductionism,” in Peter Beurton, Raphael Falk, and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Historical and Epistemological Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 286–314.
  • Bowler, Peter, 1983. The Eclipse of Darwinism, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1989. “The Mendelian Revolution: The Emergence of Hereditarian Concepts in Modern Science and Society,” Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
  • Burian, Richard M., 1985. “On conceptual change in biology: The case of the gene,” in David J. Depew and Bruce H. Weber (eds.), Evolution at a Crossroads. The New Biology and the New Philosophy of Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 21–42. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004. “Molecular Epigenesis, Molecular Pleiotropy, and Molecular Gene Definitions.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 26: 59–80. (Scholar)
  • Carlson, Elof A., 1966. The Gene: A Critical History, Philadelphia: Saunders. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1991. “Defining the Gene: An Evolving Concept.” American Journal for Human Genetics, 49: 475–487. (Scholar)
  • Chadarevian, Soraya de, 2002. Designs for Life: Molecular Biology after World War II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Churchill, Frederic, 1974. “William Johannsen and the genotype concept,” Journal of the History of Biology, 7: 5–30. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1987. “From heredity theory to ‘Vererbung’: The transmission problem, 1850-1915,” Isis, 78: 337–364. (Scholar)
  • Coleman, William, 1965. “Cell, nucleus and inheritance: an historical study,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 109: 124–158. (Scholar)
  • Correns, Carl, 1924. “Die Ergebnisse der neuesten Bastardforschungen für die Vererbungslehre (1901),” in Carl Correns, Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur Vererbungswissenschaft aus periodischen Schriften 1899–1924, Berlin: Julius Springer, 264–286. (Scholar)
  • Crick, Francis, 1958. “On protein synthesis,” Symposium of the Society of Experimental Biology, 12: 138–163. (Scholar)
  • Darden, Lindley, 2005. “Relations among fields: Mendelian, cytological and molecular mechanisms,” Studies in History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36: 349–371. (Scholar)
  • Dawkins, Richard, 1976. The Selfish Gene, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Dietrich, Michael R., 2000. “From gene to genetic hierarchy: Richard Goldschmidt and the problem of the gene,” in Peter Beurton, Raphael Falk, and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Historical and Epistemological Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 91–114. (Scholar)
  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius, 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species, New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
  • Doolittle, W.F., T.D.P Brunet, S. Linquist, and T.R. Gregory, 2014. “Distinguishing between “Function” and “Effect” in Genome Biology,” Genome Biology and Evolution, 6: 1234–1237. (Scholar)
  • Dunn, Leslie Clarence, 1965. A Short History of Genetics. The Development of some of the Main Lines of Thought: 1864–1939, New York: McGraw-Hill. (Scholar)
  • Dupré, John, 2004. “Understanding contemporary genetics,” Perspectives on Science, 12: 320–338. (Scholar)
  • Elkana, Yehuda, 1970. “Helmholtz Kraft: A case study of ‘concepts in flux’,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 2: 263–298. (Scholar)
  • Emmeche, Claus, 1999. “The Sarkar challenge: Is there any information in a cell?” Semiotica, 127: 273–293. (Scholar)
  • ENCODE Project Consortium, 2012. “An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome,” Nature, 489: 57–74. (Scholar)
  • Falk, Raphael, 1986. “What is a gene?Studies in the History and Philsophy of Science, 17: 133-173. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1995. “The struggle of genetics for independence,” Journal of the History of Biology, 28: 219–246. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000. “The gene–a concept in tension,” in Peter Beurton, Raphael Falk, and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Historical and Epistemological Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 317–348. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2001. “The rise and fall of dominance,” Biology and Philosophy, 16: 285–323. (Scholar)
  • Fischer, Ernst Peter, 1995. “How many genes has a human being? The analytical limits of a complex concept,” in E. P. Fischer and Sigmar Klose (eds.), The Human Genome, München: Piper, 223–256. (Scholar)
  • Fogle, Thomas, 1990. “Are genes units of inheritance,” Biology & Philosophy, 5: 349–371. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000. “The dissolution of protein coding genes in molecular biology,” in Peter Beurton, Raphael Falk, and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Historical and Epistemological Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–25. (Scholar)
  • Gannett, Lisa, 1999. “What's in a cause? The pragmatic dimensions of genetic explanations,” Biology and Philosophy, 14: 349–374. (Scholar)
  • García-Sancho, M., 2012. Biology, Computing, and the History of Molecular Sequencing: From Proteins to DNA, 1945-2000, London: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
  • Gayon, Jean, 1995. “Entre force et structure: genèse du concept naturaliste de l'hérédité,” in Jean Gayon and Jean-Jacques Wunenburger (eds.), Le paradigme de la filiation, Paris: L'Harmattan. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1998. Darwinism's Struggle for Survival. Heredity and the Hypothesis of Natural Selection, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000. “From measurement to organization: A philosophical scheme for the history of the concept of heredity,” in Peter Beurton, Raphael Falk, and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Historical and Epistemological Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 69–90. (Scholar)
  • Gayon, Jean and Doris Zallen, 1998. “The role of the Vilmorin Company in the promotion and diffusion of the experimental science of heredity in France, 1840-1920,” Journal of the History of Biology, 31: 241–262. (Scholar)
  • Germain, P.-L., E. Ratti, and F. Boem, 2014. “Junk or functional DNA? ENCODE and the function controversy,” Biology and Philosophy, 29: 807–831. (Scholar)
  • Gerstein, Mark B. et al, 2007. “What is a gene, post-ENCODE? History and updated definition,” Genome Research, 17: 669–681. (Scholar)
  • Gilbert, Scott, 2000. “Genes classical and genes developmental. The different use of genes in evolutionary syntheses,” in Peter Beurton, Raphael Falk, and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Historical and Epistemological Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 178–192. (Scholar)
  • Gilbert, W., 1978. “Why genes in pieces?” Nature, 271: 501. (Scholar)
  • Goldschmidt, Richard. 1940. The Material Basis of Evolution, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
  • Griesemer, James, 2000. “Reproduction and the reduction of genetics,” in Peter Beurton, Raphael Falk, and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Historical and Epistemological Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 240–285. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007. “Tracking organic processes: Representations and research styles in classical embryology and genetics,” in Manfred D. Laubichler und Jane Maienschein (eds.), From Embryology to Evo-Devo: A History of Developmental Biology, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 375–434. (Scholar)
  • Griffiths, P., and K. Stotz, 2013. Genetics and Philosophy: An Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Griffiths, Paul, and Karola Stotz. 2006. “Genes in the postgenomic era,” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 27: 499–521. (Scholar)
  • Gros, François, 1991. Les secrets du gène. Nouvelle édition revue et augmeentée, Paris: Editions Odile Jacob. (Scholar)
  • Hall, Brian K., 2001. “The gene is not dead, merely orphaned and seeking a home,” Evolution and Development, 3: 225–228. (Scholar)
  • Holmes, Frederic L., 2006. Reconceiving the Gene: Seymour Benzer's Adventures in Phage Genetics, Edited by William C. Summers. New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
  • Jablonka, Eva and Marion J. Lamb, 2005. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Jablonka, E., and G. Raz, 2009. “Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: prevalence, mechanisms, and implications for the study of heredity and evolution,” The Quarterly Review of Biology, 84: 131–176. (Scholar)
  • Jacob, François, 1976. The Logic of Life, New York: Vanguard. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1977. “Evolution and tinkering,” Science, 196: 1161–1166. (Scholar)
  • Johannsen Wilhelm, 1911. “The genotype conception of heredity,” The American Naturalist, 45: 129–159. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1909. Elemente der exakten Erblichkeitslehre, Jena: Gustav Fischer. (Scholar)
  • Judson, Horace F., 1996. The Eighth Day of Creation: Makers of the Revolution in Biology, Second edition, Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. (Scholar)
  • Kühn, Alfred, 1941. “Über eine Gen-Wirkkette der Pigmentbildung bei Insekten,” Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, 231–261. (Scholar)
  • Kay, L.E., 1993. The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Kay, Lily, 2000. Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code, Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Keller, Evelyn Fox, 2014. “From gene action to reactive genomes,” The Journal of Physiology, 592: 2423–2429. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000. “Decoding the genetic program: Or, some circular logic in the logic of circularity,” in Peter Beurton, Raphael Falk, and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Historical and Epistemological Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 159–177. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2001. The Century of the Gene, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Kim, Kyung-Man, 1994. Explaining Scientific Consensus: The Case of Mendelian Genetics, New York: Guilford Press. (Scholar)
  • Kirschner, Marc W., and John C. Gerhart, 2005. The Plausibility of Life: Resolving Darwin's Dilemma, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
  • Kitcher, Philip, 1982. “Genes,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 33: 337-359. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1984. “1953 and all that: A tale of two sciences,” The Philosophical Review, 93: 335–373.
  • –––, 2001. “Battling the undead: How (and how not) to resist genetic determinism,” in Rama Shankar Singh et al, (eds.), Thinking about Evolution: Historical, Philosophical, and Political Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Kohler, Robert E., 1994. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • López Beltrán, Carlos, 2004. “In the cradle of heredity: French physicians and l'hérédité naturelle in the early nineteenth century,” Journal of the History of Biology, 37: 39–72. (Scholar)
  • Landecker, Hannah, 2007. Culturing Life: How Cells Became Technologies, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Leonelli, S., 2008. “Bio-Ontologies as Tools for Integration in Biology,” Biological Theory, 3: 7–11. (Scholar)
  • Lindee, M.S., 2005. Moments of Truth in Genetic Medicine, Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
  • MacKenzie, Donald and Barry Barnes, 1979. “Scientific judgment: The Biometry-Mendelism controversy,” in Barry Barnes and Stephen Shapin (eds.), Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture, Beverly Hills: Sage. (Scholar)
  • Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyer Pereira, 1999. “Did Sutton and Boveri propose the so-called Sutton-Boveri chromosome hypothesis?” Genetics and Molecular Biology, 22: 261–271. (Scholar)
  • Mattick, J.S., 2007, “A new paradigm for developmental biology,” Journal of Experimental Biology, 210: 1526–1547.
  • Maynard Smith, John, 2000. “The concept of information in biology,” Philosophy of Science, 67: 177–194. (Scholar)
  • Mayr, Ernst and William Provine (eds.), 1980. The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Meloni, M., and G. Testa, 2014. “Scrutinizing the epigenetics revolution,” BioSocieties, advance online publication 4 August 2014: 1-26. (Scholar)
  • Mitchell, S.D., 2009. Unsimple Truths: Science, Complexity, and Policy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Morange, M., 2000a. A History of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000b. “The developmental gene concept: History and limits,” in Peter Beurton, Raphael Falk, and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Historical and Epistemological Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 193–215. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2001. The Misunderstood Gene, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Morgan, T.H., 1926. The theory of the gene, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1935. “The relation of genetics to physiology and medicine,” Les prix Nobel en 1933, Stockholm: Imprimerie Royale, 1–16. (Scholar)
  • Morgan, Thomas H., Alfred H. Sturtevant, Herman J. Muller, and Calvin B. Bridges, 1915. The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity, New York: Henry Holt. (Scholar)
  • Moss, Lenny, 2003. What Genes Can't Do, Cambridge: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2008. “The meanings of the gene and the future of the phenotype,” Genetics, Society and Policy, 4: 38–57. (Scholar)
  • Muller, Herman J., 1951. “The development of the gene theory,” in Leslie C. Dunn (ed.), Genetics in the 20th Century. Essays on the Progress of Genetics During its First 50 Years, New York: Macmillan, 77–99. (Scholar)
  • Müller-Wille, Staffan, 2007. “Hybrids, pure cultures, and pure lines: From nineteenth-century biology to twentieth-century genetics,” Studies in History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 38: 796–806. (Scholar)
  • Müller-Wille, Staffan, and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, 2007. “Heredity: The Production of an Epistemic Space,” in Staffan Müller-Wille and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (eds.), Heredity Produced. At the Crossroads of Biology, Politics and Culture, 1500-1870, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3–34. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2012. A Cultural History of Heredity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Müller-Wille, Staffan, and Vitezslav Orel, 2007. “From Linnaean species to Mendelian factors: Elements of hybridism, 1751-1870,” Annals of Science, 64: 171–215. (Scholar)
  • Neumann-Held, Eva M., and Christoph Rehmann-Sutter (eds.), 2006. Genes in Development: Re-Reading the Molecular Paradigm, Durham: Duke University Press. (Scholar)
  • Olby, Robert C., 1974. The path to the double helix, London: Macmillan. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1979. “Mendel no Mendelian?” History of Science, 17: 53–72. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1985. Origins of Mendelism, Second edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Orel, V. and D.L. Hartl, 1994. “Controversies in the interpretation of Mendel's discovery,” History and Philosophy of Life Sciences, 16: 436–455. (Scholar)
  • Oyama, Susan, Paul E. Griffiths, and Russell D. Gray (eds.), 2001. Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Perini, L., 2011. “Sequence Matters: Genomic Research and the Gene Concept,” Philosophy of Science, 78: 752–762. (Scholar)
  • Piro, R.M., 2011. “Are All Genes Regulatory Genes?Biology and Philosophy, 26: 595–602. (Scholar)
  • Portin, Petter, 1993. “The concept of the gene: Short history and present status,” The Quarterly Review of Biology, 68: 173–223. (Scholar)
  • Provine, William B., 1971. Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg, 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube, Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000a. “Ephestia: the experimental design of Alfred Kühn's physiological developmental genetics,” Journal of the History of Biology, 33: 535–576. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000b. “Gene concepts: Fragments from the perspective of molecular biology,” in Peter Beurton, Raphael Falk, and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Historical and Epistemological Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 219–239. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2008. “Heredity and its entities around 1900,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 39: 370–374. (Scholar)
  • Richmond, Martha, 2007. “The cell as the basis for heredity, development, and evolution: Richard Goldschmidt's program of physiological genetics,” in Manfred D. Laubichler und Jane Maienschein (eds.). From Embryology to Evo-Devo: A History of Developmental Biology, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 169–211. (Scholar)
  • Robinson, Gloria, 1979. A Prelude to Genetics: Theories of a Material Substance of Heredity, Darwin to Weismann, Lawrence, Kansas: Coronado Press. (Scholar)
  • Roll-Hansen, Nils, 1978a. “The genotype theory of Wilhelm Johannsen and its relation to plant breeding and the study of evolution,” Centaurus, 22: 201–235. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1978b. “Drosophila genetics: A reductionist research program,” Journal of the History of Biology, 11: 159–210. (Scholar)
  • Rose, N., 2007. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
  • Sarkar, Sahotra, 1996. “Biological information: A skeptical look at some central dogmas of molecular biology,” in Sahotra Sarkar (ed.), The Philosophy and History of Molecular Biology: New Perspectives, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 187–231. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1998. Genetics and reductionism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Schaffner, Kenneth F., 1969. “The Watson-Crick model and reductionism,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 20: 325–48. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1993. Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Schrödinger, Erwin, 1944. What is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Schwartz, James, 2008. In Pursuit of the Gene. From Darwin to DNA, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Schwartz, Sara, 2000. “The differential concept of the gene: Past and present,” in Peter Beurton, Raphael Falk, and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Historical and Epistemological Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 26–39. (Scholar)
  • Stent, Gunther S., 1977. “Explicit and implicit semantic content of the genetic information,” in Robert E. Butts and Jaakko Hintikka (eds.), Foundational Problems in the Special Sciences, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 131–149. (Scholar)
  • Sterelny, Kim and Philip Kitcher, 1988. “The return of the gene,” Journal of Philosophy, 85: 339–360. (Scholar)
  • Stevens, H., 2013. Life Out of Sequence: A Data-Driven History of Bioinformatics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Stotz, Karola, Paul E. Griffiths, and Rob Knight, 2004. “How biologists conceptualize genes: an empirical study,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 35: 647–673. (Scholar)
  • Stubbe, Hans, 1965. Kurze Geschichte der Genetik bis zur Wiederentdeckung der Vererbungsregeln Gregor Mendels, Jena: VEB Fischer. (Scholar)
  • Waddington, C.H., 1957. The strategy of the genes; a discussion of some aspects of theoretical biology, London: Allen & Unwin. (Scholar)
  • Waters, Kenneth C., 1994. “Genes made molecular,” Philosophy of Science, 61: 163–185. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000. “Molecules made biological,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4: 539–64. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004a. “What was classical Genetics?Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 35:83–109. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004b. “A pluralist interpretation of gene-centered biology,” in Stephen E. Kellert, Helen E. Longino and K. C. Waters (eds.), Scientific Pluralism, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 190–214.
  • –––, 2007. “Causes that make a difference,” The Journal of Philosophy, 104: 551–579. (Scholar)
  • Weber, Marcel, 2004. “Philosophy of Experimental Biology,” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007. “Redesigning the fruitfly: The molecularization of Drosophila,” in Angela N. H. Creager, Eliyabeth Lunbeck, and M. Norton Wise (eds.), Science Without Laws: Model Systems, Cases, Exemplary Narratives, Durham: Duke University Press, 23–45. (Scholar)
  • West-Eberhard, Mary Jane, 2003. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)

Generated Mon Sep 18 03:12:16 2017