Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Generic Generalizations" by Sarah-Jane Leslie and Adam Lerner
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Asher, N. and D. Bonevac, 1996, “Prima Facie Obligation”, Studia Logica, 57(1): 19–45. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, “Common Sense Obligation”, in Defeasible Deontic Logic, D. Nute (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 159–203. (Scholar)
- Asher, N. and M. Morreau, 1995, “What Some Generic Sentences Mean”, in Carlson and Pelletier 1995: 300–339. (Scholar)
- Asher, N. and F.J. Pelletier, 2012, “More Truths About Generic Truth”, in Mari et al. 2012: 313–333. (Scholar)
- Bäck, A., 1996, “Review of Generische Kennzeichnungen, by Gerhard Heyer (1987)”, Noûs 30(2): 276–281. (Scholar)
- Baldwin, D.A., E. Markman, and R. Melartin, 1993, “Infants’ Ability to Draw Inferences About Nonobvious Object Properties: Evidence from Exploratory Play”, Child Development, 64(3): 711–28. (Scholar)
- Barwise, J. and J. Perry, 1983, Situations and Attitudes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Brandone, A., A. Cimpian, S.J. Leslie, and S.A. Gelman, 2012, “Do Lions Have Manes? For Children, Generics Are About Kinds Not Quantities”, Child Development, 83(2): 423–433. (Scholar)
- Brandone, A., S.A. Gelman, and J. Hedglen, 2015, “Children’s Developing Intuitions About the Truth Conditions and Implications of Novel Generics Versus Quantified Statements”, Cognitive Science, 39(4): 711–738. (Scholar)
- Burton-Roberts, N., 1977, “Generic Sentences and Analyticity”, Studies in Language, 1: 155–196. (Scholar)
- Carlson, G., 1977, Reference to Kinds in English, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, “On the Semantic Composition of English Generic Sentences”, in Chierchia et al. 1989: 167–192. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995, “Truth Conditions of Generic Sentences: Two Contrasting Views ”, in G. Carlson and F.J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 224–237. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “Genericity”, in C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, and P. Portner (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook vol. II, Chapter 47, Berlin: de Gruyter: Berlin, pp. 1153–1185. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Generic and Habitual Aspect”, in R. Binnick (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 828–851. (Scholar)
- Cavedon, L. and S. Glasbey, 1994, “Outline of an Information-Flow Model of Generics”, Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 42. (Scholar)
- Carlson, G. and F.J. Pelletier (eds.), 1995, The Generic Book, Chicago: Chicago University Press. (Scholar)
- Cheng, K.Y., 2011, “A New Look at the Problem of Rule Following: A Generic Perspective”, Philosophical Studies, 155:1–21. (Scholar)
- Chierchia, G., 1995, “Individual Level Predicates as Inherent Generics”, in Carlson and Pelletier 1995: 176–224. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, “Reference to Kinds Across Languages”, Natural Language Semantics, 6. (Scholar)
- Chierchia, G., B.H. Partee, and R. Turner (eds.), 1989, Properties, Types and Meaning, Vol. II: Semantic Issues, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Cimpian, A., 2013, “Generic Statements, Causal Attributions, and Children’s Naive Theories”, in Navigating the Social World: The Early Years, M.R. Banaji and S.A. Gelman (eds.), New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 269–274. (Scholar)
- Cimpian, A., A.C. Brandone, and S.A. Gelman, 2010, “Generic Statements Require Little Evidence for Acceptance but Have Powerful Implications”, Cognitive Science, 34(8): 1452–1482. (Scholar)
- Cimpian, A. and L.C. Erickson, 2012, “Remembering kinds: New evidence that categories are privileged in children’s thinking”, Cognitive Psychology, 64(3): 161–185. (Scholar)
- Cimpian, A., S.A. Gelman, and A.C. Brandone, 2010, “Theory-based considerations influence the interpretation of generic sentences”, Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2): 261–276. (Scholar)
- Cimpian, A. and E.M. Markman, 2009, “Information learned from generic language becomes central to children’s biological concepts: Evidence from their open-ended explanations”, Cognition, 113(1): 14–25. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “The Generic/Nongeneric Distinction Influences How Children Interpret New Information About Social Others”, Child Development, 82(2): 471–492. (Scholar)
- Cimpian, A., Y. Mu, and L.C. Erickson, 2012, “Who Is Good at This Game? Linking an Activity to a Social Category Undermines Children’s Achievement”, Psychological Science, 23(5): 533–541. (Scholar)
- Cohen, A., 1996, Think Generic: The Meaning and Use of Generic Sentences, Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, “Generics, Frequency Adverbs and Probability”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 22(3): 221–253. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, “On the Generic Use of Indefinite Singulars”, Journal of Semantics, 18(3): 183–209. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, “Generics and Mental Representation”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 27(5): 529–556. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “No Quantification Without Reinterpretation”, in Mari et al. 2012: pp. 334–351. (Scholar)
- Cohen, A. and N. Erteschik-Shir, 1997, “Topic, Focus and the Interpretation of Bare Plurals”, in Proceedings of the 11th Amsterdam Colloquium, P. Dekker, M. Stokhof, and Y. Venema (eds.), pp. 31–36. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, “Topic, Focus, and the Interpretation of Bare Plurals”, Natural Language Semantics, 10(2): 125–165. (Scholar)
- Dahl, O., 1975, “On Generics”, in Keenan 1975: 99–111. (Scholar)
- –––, 1985, Tense and Aspect Systems, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Declerk, R., 1986, “The Manifold Interpretations of Generic Sentences”, Lingua, 68: 149–188. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, “The Origins of Genericity”, Linguistics, 29(1): 79–102. (Scholar)
- Delgrande, J.P., 1987, “A First-Order Conditional Logic for Prototypical Properties”, Artificial Intelligence, 33(1): 105–130. (Scholar)
- Diesing, M., 1992, Indefinites, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Fara, M.G., 2005, “Dispositions and Habituals”, Noûs,39(1): 43–82. (Scholar)
- Gelman, S.A., 2003, The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “Generics as a Window onto Young Children’s Concepts”, in Kinds, Things, and Stuff: The Cognitive Side of Generics and Mass Terms (New Directions in Cognitive Science v. 12.), F.J. Pelletier (ed.), New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 100–122. (Scholar)
- Gelman, S.A. and P. Bloom, 2007, “Developmental Changes in the Understanding of Generics”, Cognition, 105(1): 166–183. (Scholar)
- Gelman, S.A., P.J. Goetz, B.S. Sarnecka, and J. Flukes, 2008, “Generic Language in Parent-Child Conversations”, Language Learning and Development, 4(1): 1–31. (Scholar)
- Gelman, S.A. and L. Raman, 2003, “Preschool Children Use Linguistic Form Class and Pragmatic Cues to Interpret Generics”, Child Development 74(1): 308–325. (Scholar)
- Gelman, S.A., I. Sánchez Tapia, and S.J. Leslie, 2015, “Memory for Generic and Quantified Sentences in Spanish-speaking Children and Adults”, Journal of Child Language, epub ahead of print. doi:10.1017/s0305000915000483 (Scholar)
- Gelman, S.A., and T.Z. Tardif, 1998, “A Cross-Linguistic Comparison of Generic Noun Phrases in English and Mandarin”, Cognition, 66(3): 215–248. (Scholar)
- Gelman, S.A., E.A. Ware, and F. Kleinberg, 2010, “Effects of Generic Language on Category Content and Structure”, Cognitive Psychology, 61(3): 273–301 (Scholar)
- Gerstner-Link, C., 1988, Uber Generizitat. Generische Nominalphrasen in Singularen Aussagen und Generischen Aussagen, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Munich. (Scholar)
- Geurts, B., 1985, “Generics”, Journal of Semantics, 4(3): 247–255. (Scholar)
- Graham, S.A., S.L. Nayer, and S.A. Gelman, 2011, “Two-Year-Olds Use the Generic/Non-generic Distinction to Guide Their Inferences About Novel Kinds”, Child Development, 82(2): 493–507. (Scholar)
- Greenberg, Y., 2003, Manifestations of Genericity, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Haslam, N., L. Rothschild, and D. Ernst, 2000, “Essentialist Beliefs About Social Categories”, British Journal of Social Psychology, 39: 113–127. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, “Are Essentialist Beliefs Associated with Prejudice?”, British Journal of Social Psychology, 41: 87–100. (Scholar)
- Haslanger, S., 2011, “Ideology, Generics, and Common Ground”, in Feminist Metaphysics: Explorations in the Ontology of Sex, Gender, and the Self, Charlotte Witt (ed.), Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 179–209. (Scholar)
- Heim, I., 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. (Scholar)
- Heyer, G., 1985, “Generic Descriptions, Default Reasoning, and Typicality”, Theoretical Linguistics, 12(1): 33–72. (Scholar)
- –––, 1987, “Generische Kennzeichnungen: Zur Logik und Ontologie Generischer Bedeutung”, München: Philosophia Verlag. (Scholar)
- –––, 1990, “Semantics and Knowledge Representation in the Analysis of Generic Descriptions”, Journal of Semantics, 7: 93–110. (Scholar)
- Hollander, M.A., S.A. Gelman, and J. Star, 2002, “Children’s Interpretation of Generic Noun Phrases”, Developmental Psychology, 38(6): 883–894. (Scholar)
- Johnston, M., forthcoming, “Remnant Persons: Animalism’s Undoing”, in Essays on Animalism: Persons, Animals, and Identity, S. Blatti and P. Snowdon (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Johnston, M. and S.J. Leslie, 2012, “Concepts, analysis, generics and the Canberra plan”, Philosophical Perspectives, 26(1): 113–171. (Scholar)
- Jönsson, M.L. and J.A. Hampton, 2006, “The Inverse Conjunction Fallacy”, Journal of Memory and Language, 55(3): 317–334. (Scholar)
- Kamp, H., 1981, “A Theory of Truth and Semantic Interpretation”, in Formal Methods in the Study of Language, J. Groenendijk, J. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.), Dordrecht: Forts Publications, pp. 277–322. (Scholar)
- Kamp, H. and U. Reyle, 1993, From Discourse to Logic, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Scholar)
- Kaplan, D., 1989, “Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals”, in Themes from Kaplan, J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 481–563. (Scholar)
- Keenan, E.L. (ed.), 1975, Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Khemlani, S., S.J. Leslie, and S. Glucksberg, 2009, “Generics, Prevalence, and Default Inferences”, Proceedings of the 31st Annual Cognitive Science Society, Amsterdam: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 443–448. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Inferences About Members of Kinds: The Generics Hypothesis”, Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(6): 887–900. (Scholar)
- Kiss, K.E., 1998, “On Generic and Existential Bare Plurals and the Classification of Predicates”, in Events and Grammar, S. Rothstein (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 145–162. (Scholar)
- Kratzer, A., 1995, “Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates”, in Carlson and Pelletier 1995: 125–176. (Scholar)
- Krifka, M., partly in collaboration with Claudia Gerstner, 1987, An Outline of Genericity, SNS-Bericht 87–23, University of Tubingen. (Scholar)
- Krifka, M., F. Pelletier, G. Carlson, A. ter Meulen, G. Chierchia, and G. Link, 1995, “Genericity: An Introduction”, in Carlson and Pelletier 1995: 1–125. (Scholar)
- Laca, B., 1990, “Generics Objects: Some More Pieces of the Puzzle”, Lingua, 81: 25–46. (Scholar)
- Lawler, J., 1972, “Generic to a Fault”, in Papers from the 8th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 8), Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 247–258. (Scholar)
- –––, 1973, “Studies in English generics”, University of Michigan Papers in Linguistics, 1(1). (Scholar)
- Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, D. and L. Stockall, 2013, “Genericity, Exceptions and Domain Restriction: Experimental Evidence from Comparison with Universals”, in Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 17, E. Chemla, V. Homer, and G. Winterstein (eds.), pp. 325–343. (Scholar)
- Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, D., N. Katsos, and L. Stockall, 2015, “Genericity Is Easy? Formal and Experimental Perspectives”, Ratio, 28(4): 470–494. (Scholar)
- Lerner, A. and S.J. Leslie, 2013, “Generics, Generalism, and Reflective Equilibrium: Implications for Moral Theorizing from the Study of Language”, Philosophical Perspectives 27(1): 366–403. (Scholar)
- Leslie, S.J., 2007, “Generics and the Structure of the Mind”, Philosophical Perspectives, 21(1): 375–403. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, “Generics: Cognition and Acquisition”, Philosophical Review, 117(1): 1–47. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Generics Articulate Default Generalizations”, Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes, 41: 25–44. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, “Essence and Natural Kinds: When Science Meets Preschooler Intuition”, in T. Gendler and J. Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology, 4: 108–166. (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, “Carving Up the Social World with Generics”, Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, 1: 208–232. (Scholar)
- –––, 2015a, “Generics Oversimplified”, Noûs, 49(1): 28–54. (Scholar)
- –––, 2015b, “‘Hillary Clinton is the Only Man in the Obama Administration’: Dual Character Concepts, Generics, and Gender”, Analytic Philosophy, 56(2): 111–141. (Scholar)
- –––, forthcoming, “The Original Sin of Cognition: Fear, Prejudice, and Generalization”, The Journal of Philosophy. [Leslie forthcoming draft available online] (Scholar)
- Leslie, S.J. and S.A. Gelman, 2012, “Quantified Statements are Recalled as Generics: Evidence from Preschool Children and Adults”, Cognitive Psychology, 64(3): 186–214. (Scholar)
- Leslie, S.J., S. Khemlani, and S. Glucksberg, 2011, “Do All Ducks Lay Eggs? The Generic Overgeneralization Effect”, Journal of Memory and Language, 65(1): 15–31. (Scholar)
- Lewis, D., 1975, “Adverbs of Quantification”, in Keenan 1975: 3–15. (Scholar)
- Liebesman, D., 2011, “Simple Generics”, Noûs, 45(3): 409–442. (Scholar)
- Mannheim, B., S.A. Gelman, C. Escalante, M. Huayhua, and R. Puma, 2011, “A Developmental Analysis of Generic Nouns in Southern Peruvian Quechua”, Language Learning and Development, 7(1): 1–23. (Scholar)
- Mari, A., C. Beyssade, and F.D. Prete (eds.), 2012, Genericity, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- McCarthy, J., 1986, “Applications of Circumscription to Formalizing Commonsense Knowledge”, Artificial Intelligence, 28(1): 89–116. (Scholar)
- McConnell-Ginet, S., 2012, “Generic Predicates and Interest Relativity”, Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 57(2): 289–302. (Scholar)
- ter Meulen, A., 1986, “Generic Information, Conditional Contexts and Constraints”, in On Conditionals, E.C. Traugott, A. ter Meulen, J.S. Reilly, and C.A. Ferguson (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 123–146. (Scholar)
- Meyer, M., S.A. Gelman, and S.M. Stilwell, 2011, “Generics Are a Cognitive Default: Evidence from Sentence Processing”, in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston, MA: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 913–918. (Scholar)
- Milsark, G., 1974, Existential Sentences in English, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. (Scholar)
- Nickel, B., 2008, “Generics and the Way of Normality”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 31(6): 629–648. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “Ceteris Paribus Laws: Generics and Natural Kinds”, Philosopher’s Imprint, 10(6): 1–25. [Nickel 2010 available online] (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Dutchmen are Good Sailors: Generics and Gradability”, in Mari et al. 2012: 390–405. (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, “The Role of Kinds in the Semantics of Ceterius Paribus Laws”, Erkenntnis, 79(10): 1729–1744. doi:10.1007/s10670-014-9638-5 (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, Between Logic and the World: An Integrated Theory of Generics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Nunberg, G. and C. Pan, 1975, “Inferring Quantification in Generic Sentences”, in Papers from the Eleventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 11), Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 412–422. (Scholar)
- Ojeda, Almerindo, 1991, “Definite Descriptions and Definite Generics”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 14: 367–397. (Scholar)
- Pelletier, F.J. and N. Asher, 1997, “Generics and Defaults”, in Handbook of Logic and Language, J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1125–1179. (Scholar)
- Platteau, F., 1980, “Definite and Indefinite Generics”, in J. van der Auwera (ed.), The Semantics of Determiners, London: Croom Helm, pp. 112–123, (Scholar)
- Prasada, S. and E.M. Dillingham, 2006, “Principled and Statistical Connections in Common Sense Conception”, Cognition, 99(1): 73–112. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Representation of Principled Connections: A Window onto the Formal Aspect of Common Sense Conception”, Cognitive Science, 33(3): 401–448. (Scholar)
- Prasada, S., S. Khemlani, S.J. Leslie, and S. Glucksberg. 2013, “Conceptual Distinctions Amongst Generics”, Cognition, 126(3): 405–422. (Scholar)
- Reiter, R., 1987, “Nonmonotonic Reasoning”, in Annual Review of Computer Science, J.F. Traub, N.J. Nilsson, and B.J. Grosz (eds.), Palo Alto: Annual Reviews Inc., pp. 147–186. (Scholar)
- Rhodes, M., S.J. Leslie, and C. Tworek, 2012, “Cultural Transmission of Social Essentialism”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 109(34): 13526–13531. (Scholar)
- Rosch, E.H., 1978, “Principles of Categorization”, in Cognition and Categorization, E. Rosch and B. Lloyd (eds.), Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates, pp. 27–48. (Scholar)
- Schubert, L.K. and F.J. Pelletier. 1987, “Problems in Representing the Logical Form of Generics, Bare Plurals, and Mass Terms”, in New Directions in Semantics, E. Lepore (ed), London: Academic Press, pp. 385–451. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, “Generically Speaking, or Using Discourse Representation Theory to Interpret Generics”, in Chierchia et al. 1989: 193–268. (Scholar)
- Sloman, S.A., 1993, “Feature-Based Induction”, Cognitive Psychology, 25(2): 231–280. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, “Categorical Inference Is Not a Tree: The Myth of Inheritance Hierarchies”, Cognitive Psychology 35(1): 1–33. (Scholar)
- Sorensen, R., 2012, “The Sorites and the Generic Overgeneralization Effect”, Analysis, 62(3): 444–449. (Scholar)
- Steele, C.M., 2010, Whistling Vivaldi: How Stereotypes Affect Us and What We Can Do, New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. (Scholar)
- Steele, C.M. and J. Aronson, 1995, “Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5): 797–811. (Scholar)
- Sterken, R.K., 2015, “Generics in Context”, Philosopher’s Imprint, 15(21): 1–30. [Sterken 2015 available online] (Scholar)
- Stump, G., 1985, The Semantic Variability of Absolute Constructions, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
- Tardif, T., S.A. Gelman, X. Fu, and L. Zhu., 2011, “Acquisition of Generic Noun Phrases in Chinese: Learning About Lions Without an ‘-s’”, Journal of Child Language, 30(1): 130–161. (Scholar)
- Teichman, M., 2015, Characterizing Kinds, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago. [Teichman 2015 available online] (Scholar)
- Wasserman, R., 2011, “Dispositions and Generics”, Philosophical Perspectives, 25(1): 425–453. (Scholar)
- Wilkinson, K., 1995, “The Common Noun Kind”, in Carlson and Pelletier 1995: 383–397. (Scholar)
