Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Hume’s Aesthetics" by Theodore Gracyk
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
Hume’s Works
The abbreviations and texts cited above are as follows:
[T] |
A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by L. A.
Selby-Bigge, 2nd ed. revised by P.H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon
Press, 1975. [Page references above are to this edition.] |
|
A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by David Fate Norton
and Mary J. Norton, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press,
2000. |
[EHU] |
An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, in
Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the
Principles of Morals, edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge, 3rd edition
revised by P. H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975. |
[EHUa] |
An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, edited by
Tom L. Beauchamp, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. |
[EPM] |
An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals, in
Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the
Principles of Morals, edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge, 3rd edition
revised by P. H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.[Page
references above are to this edition.] |
|
Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals, edited by
Tom L. Beauchamp, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. |
[HL] |
The Letters of David Hume, edited by J.Y.T. Greig, 2
volumes, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1932. |
[PW] |
The Philosophical Works of David Hume, edited by T. H.
Green and T. H. Grose. 4 volumes, London: Longman, Green,
1874–75. [Page references below to individual essays are to
volume 3 of this edition.] |
[C] |
“Of Commerce,” in PW, Volume 3. |
[CL] |
“Of Civil Liberty,” in PW, Volume 3. |
[DOT] |
“Of the Delicacy of Taste and Passion,” in PW,
Volume 3. |
[E] |
“Of Eloquence,” in PW, Volume 3. |
[OT] |
“Of Tragedy,” in PW, Volume 3. |
[S] |
“The Sceptic,” in PW, Volume 3. |
[SOT] |
“Of the Standard of Taste,” in PW, Volume 3. |
[SRW] |
“Of Simplicity and Refinement in Writing,” in PW,
Volume 3. |
Works on Hume’s Aesthetics
- Baceski, Tina, 2013. “Hume on Art Critics, Wise Men, and
the Virtues of Taste,” Hume Studies, 39:
233–56. (Scholar)
- Baxter, Donald L. M., 1990. “Hume on Virtue, Beauty, Composites, and Secondary Qualities,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 71: 103–18. (Scholar)
- Brown, Stuart Gerry, 1938. “Observations on Hume’s
Theory of Taste,” English Studies, 20:
193–98. (Scholar)
- Budd, Malcolm, 1991. “Hume’s Tragic Emotions,”
Hume Studies, 17: 93–106. (Scholar)
- Carroll, Noël, 1984. “Hume’s Standard of
Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 43:
181–94. (Scholar)
- Cohen, Ralph, 1962. “The Transformation of Passion: A Study
of Hume’s Theories of Tragedy,‘Antinomy of
Taste’,” Philological Quarterly, 41:
450–64. (Scholar)
- Cohen, Ted, 1994. “Partial Enchantment in
Hume’s Essay on Taste,” in Robert Yanal (ed.),
Institutions of Art: Reconsiderations of George Dickie’s
Philosophy, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University
Press, 145–56. (Scholar)
- Costelloe, Timothy M., 2003. “Hume, Kant, and the
‘Antinomy of Taste’,” Journal of the History of
Philosophy, 41: 165–85. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007. Aesthetics and Morals in the Philosophy of David Hume (Routledge Studies in Eighteenth Century Philosophy), London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, 2018. Imagination in Hume’s
Philosophy: The Canvas of the Mind, Edinburgh: Edinburgh
University Press. (Scholar)
- Dadlez, Eva M., 2002. “The Vicious Habits of Entirely Fictitious People: Hume on the Moral Evaluation of Art,” Philosophy and Literature, 26: 143–56. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004. “Pleased and Afflicted: Hume on the Paradox of Tragic Pleasure,” Hume Studies, 30: 213–36. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016. “A Humean Approach to the Problem of Disgust and Aesthetic Appreciation,” Essays in Philosophy, 17(1): Article 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.7710/1526-0569.1543. (Scholar)
- –––, 2017. “Hume, Halos, and Rough Heroes: Moral and Aesthetic Defects in Works of Fiction,” Philosophy and Literature, 41: 91–102. (Scholar)
- Dickie, George, 2003. “James Shelley on Critical Principles,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 43: 57–64. (Scholar)
- Durà-Vilà, Víctor, 2014. “Courage in Art Appreciation: A Humean Perspective,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 54 (1): 77–95. (Scholar)
- –––, 2015. “Shelley on Hume’s
Standard of Taste and the Impossibility of Sound Disagreement among
the Ideal Critics,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art
Criticism, 73 (3): 341–45. (Scholar)
- Foot, Philippa, 1966. “Hume on Moral Judgment,” in
David F. Pears (ed.), David Hume: A Symposium, London:
Macmillan, 67–76. (Scholar)
- Galgut, Elisa, 2001. “The Poetry and the Pity: Hume’s
Account of Tragic Pleasure,” British Journal of
Aesthetics, 41: 411–24. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012. “Hume’s Aesthetic
Standard,” Hume Studies, 38: 183–200. (Scholar)
- Gracyk, Theodore, 1994. “Rethinking Hume’s Standard
of Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 52:
168–82. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011. “Delicacy in Hume’s
Aesthetic Theory,” Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 9:
1–16. (Scholar)
- Grant, James, 2014. “Hume, David. Theory of Beauty,”
in Michael Kelly (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Aesthetics,
2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, Volume 3:
368–72. (Scholar)
- Guyer, Paul, 2005. “Beauty and Utility in
Eighteenth-Century Aesthetics,” in Paul Guyer, Values of
Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press: 110–28. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005. “The Standard of Taste and the
‘Most Ardent Desire of Society’,” in Paul Guyer,
Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press: 37–74. (Scholar)
- Hester, Marcus, 1979. “Hume on Principles and Perceptual Ability,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 37: 295–302. (Scholar)
- Jones, Peter, 1976. “Hume’s Aesthetics
Reassessed,” Philosophical Quarterly, 26:
48–62. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009. “Hume on the Arts and
‘The Standard of Taste’: Texts and Contexts,” in
David Fate Norton and Jacqueline Tylor (eds.), The Cambridge
Companion to Hume, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:
414–46. (Scholar)
- Kivy, Peter, 1967. “Hume’s Standard of Taste:
Breaking the Circle,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 7:
57–66. (Scholar)
- –––, 1983. “Hume’s Neighbor’s
Wife: An Essay in the Evolution of Hume’s Aesthetics,”
British Journal of Aesthetics, 23: 195–208. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011. “Remarks on the Varieties of
Prejudice in Hume’s Essay on Taste,” Journal of
Scottish Philosophy, 9: 111–15. (Scholar)
- Korsmeyer, Carolyn, 1976. “Hume and the Foundations of Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 35: 201–15. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995. “Gendered Concepts and
Hume’s Standard of Taste,” in P. Z. Brand and Carolyn
Korsmeyer (eds.), Feminism and Tradition in Aesthetics,
University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp.
49–65. (Scholar)
- Kulenkampff, Jens, 1990. “The Objectivity of Taste: Hume and Kant,” Noûs, 24: 93–100. (Scholar)
- Levinson, Jerrold, 2002. “Hume’s Standard of Taste:
The Real Problem,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art
Criticism, 60: 227–238. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003. “The Real Problem Sustained: Reply to Wieand”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 61: 398–99. (Scholar)
- MacLachlan, Christopher, 1986. “Hume and the Standard of Taste”, Hume Studies, 12: 18–38. (Scholar)
- MacMillan, Claude, 1986. “Hume, Points of View and Aesthetic Judgments”, The Journal of Value Inquiry, 20: 109–23. (Scholar)
- Marshall, David, 1995. “Arguing by Analogy: Hume’s
Standard of Taste,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 28:
323–43. (Scholar)
- Mason, Michelle, 2001. “Moral Prejudice and Aesthetic
Deformity: Rereading Hume’s ‘Of the Standard of
Taste’,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,
59: 59–71. (Scholar)
- Mothersill, Mary, 1997. “In Defense of Hume and the Causal Theory of Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 55: 312–17. (Scholar)
- –––, 1984. “Hume: ‘Of the Standard
of Taste’,” in Beauty Restored, Oxford: Clarendon
Press, pp. 177–208. (Scholar)
- –––, 2014. “Hume, David. ‘Of the
Standard of Taste,’” in Michael Kelly (ed.), The
Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford
University Press, Volume 3: 364–68. (Scholar)
- Neill, Alex, 1998. “‘An Unaccountable Pleasure’: Hume on Tragedy and the Passions,” Hume Studies, 24: 335–354. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992. “Yanal and Others on Hume on Tragedy,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 50: 151–154. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999. “Hume’s ‘Singular
Phænomenon’,” British Journal of
Aesthetics, 39: 112–125. (Scholar)
- Noxon, James, 1961. “Hume’s Opinion of
Critics,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 20:
157–62. (Scholar)
- Osborne, Harold, 1967. “Hume’s Standard and the
Diversity of Aesthetic Taste,” British Journal of
Aesthetics, 7: 50–56. (Scholar)
- Perricone, Christopher, 1995. “The Body and Hume’s
Standard of Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art
Criticism, 53: 371–8. (Scholar)
- Ribeiro, Brian, 2007. “Hume’s Standard of Taste and
the de gustibus Sceptic,” British Journal of
Aesthetics, 47: 16–28. (Scholar)
- Rose, Mary Carman, 1976. “The Importance of Hume in the History of Western Aesthetics,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 16: 218–29. (Scholar)
- Ross, Stephanie, 2008. “Humean Critics: Real or Ideal?,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 48: 20–28. (Scholar)
- Saccamano, Neil, 2011. “Aesthetically Non-Dwelling: Sympathy, Property, and the House of Beauty in Hume’s Treatise,” Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 9: 37–58. (Scholar)
- Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey, 1994. “On Why Hume’s
‘General Point of View’ isn’t Ideal – and
Shouldn’t Be,” Social Philosophy and Policy, 11:
202–28. (Scholar)
- Schier, Flint, 1986–87. “Hume and the Aesthetics of Agency,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 87: 121–35. (Scholar)
- Shelley, James, 1994. “Hume’s Double Standard of
Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 52:
437–45. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998. “Hume and the Nature of
‘Taste’,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art
Criticism, 56: 29–38. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002. “The Character and Role of Principles in the Evaluation of Art,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 42; 37–51. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004. “Hume’s Principles of
Taste: A Reply to Dickie,” British Journal of
Aesthetics, 44: 84–89. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011. “Hume and the Value of the Beautiful,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 51: 213–22. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013. “Hume and the Verdict of True
Judges,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 71
(2): 145–53. (Scholar)
- –––, 2015. “When True Judges Differ: Reply to Durà-Vilà,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 73 (3): 345–48. (Scholar)
- Shiner, Roger A., 1996. “Hume and the Causal Theory of Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 54: 237–49. (Scholar)
- Shusterman, Richard, 1989. “Of the Scandal of Taste: Social Privilege as Nature in the Aesthetic Theories of Hume and Kant,” Philosophical Forum, 20: 211–29. (Scholar)
- Siebert, Donald T., 1989. “The Sentimental Sublime in
Hume’s History of England,” Review of English
Studies New Series, 40: 352–72. (Scholar)
- Stradella, Alessandra, 2012. “The Fiction of the Standard of Taste: David Hume on the Social Constitution of Beauty,” The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 46 (4): 32–47. (Scholar)
- Sverdlik, Steven, 1986. “Hume’s Key and Aesthetic
Rationality,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,
45: 69–76. (Scholar)
- Taylor, Jacqueline, 2008. “Hume on Beauty and Virtue,” in Elisabeth Radcliffe (ed.), A Companion to Hume, Oxford: Blackwell, 273–92. (Scholar)
- Townsend, Dabney, 2001. Hume’s Aesthetic Theory: Taste
and Sentiment, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013. “Hume’s Aesthetic Move:
The Legitimization of Sentiment.” The European Legacy:
Toward New Paradigms, 18 (5): 552–562. (Scholar)
- Wieand, Jeffrey, 1984. “Hume’s Two Standards of
Taste,” Philosophical Quarterly, 34: 129–42. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003. “Hume’s Real
Problem,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 61:
395–98. (Scholar)
- Williams, Christopher, 2007. “Some Questions in
Hume’s Aesthetics,” Philosophy Compass, 2:
157–69. (Scholar)
- Winegar, Reed, 2011. “Good Sense, Art, and Morality in
Hume’s ‘Standard of Taste,’” Journal of
Scottish Philosophy, 9: 17–35. (Scholar)
- Yanal, Robert J., 1991. “Hume and Others on the Paradox of Tragedy,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 49: 75–76. (Scholar)
- Zangwill, Nick, 2001. “Hume, Taste, and Teleology,”
in The Metaphysics of Beauty, Ithaca: Cornell University
Press: 149–65. (Scholar)
Related Works on Hume and His Context
- Addison, Joseph, and Steele, Richard, 1879. The
Spectator, Alexander Chalmers (ed.), New York: D. Appleton. (Scholar)
- Brunius, Teddy, 1952. David Hume on Criticism,
Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell. (Scholar)
- Coleman, Francis X. J., 1971. The Aesthetic Thought of the French Enlightenment, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
- Costelloe, Timothy, 2013. The British Aesthetic Tradition: From Shaftesbury to Wittgenstein, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Dickie, George, 1996. The Century of Taste, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- DuBos, Jean Baptiste, 1748. Critical Reflections on Poetry,
Painting, and Music, 3 vols. Translated by Thomas Nugent. London:
John Nourse. Reprint, New York: AMS Press, 1978. (Scholar)
- Duncan, Elmer H., 1970. “The Ideal Aesthetic Observer: a Second Look”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 29: 47–52. (Scholar)
- Guyer, Paul, 2014. A History of Modern Aesthetics (Vol. 1: The Eighteenth Century), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Hipple, Walter John Jr., 1967. The Beautiful, the Sublime,
and the Picturesque in Eighteenth Century Aesthetic Theory,
Carbondale, IL: The Southern Illinois University Press. (Scholar)
- Jones, Peter, 1982. Hume’s Sentiments: Their Ciceronian
and French Context, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. (Scholar)
- Kivy, Peter, 2003. The Seventh Sense: Francis Hutcheson & Eighteenth-Century British Aesthetics, 2nd ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016. “Hume’s Taste and the
Rationalist Critique,” in Paul Russell (ed.), The Oxford
Handbook of Hume, Oxford: Oxford University Press,
531–545. (Scholar)
- Savile, Anthony, 1982. The Test of Time: An Essay in Philosophical Aesthetics, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1988. Aesthetic Reconstructions: The Seminal Writings of Lessing, Kant, and Schiller, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Shaftesbury (Anthony Ashley-Cooper, Third Earl of Shaftesbury),
1999. Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times (2
volumes), Philip Ayres (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Shelley, James, 2001. “Empiricism: Hutcheson and
Hume,” in Berys Gaut and Dominic M. Lopes (eds.), Routledge
Companion to Aesthetics, 3rd edition, London and New
York: Routledge: 36–45. (Scholar)
- Townsend, Dabney, 1987. “From Shaftesbury to Kant: The Development of the Concept of Aesthetic Experience,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 48: 287–305. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003. “Art and the Aesthetic: Hume,
Kant, and the Essence of Art,” in Stephen Davies and Ananta Ch.
Sukla (eds.), Art and Essences, Westport, CT: Praeger,
75–93. (Scholar)