Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Hume's Aesthetics" by Theodore Gracyk

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Hume’s Works

The abbreviations and texts cited above are as follows:

[T] A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge, 2nd ed. revised by P.H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975. [Page references above are to this edition.]
A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
[EHU] An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, in Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals, edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge, 3rd edition revised by P. H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.
[EHUa] An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, edited by Tom L. Beauchamp, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
[EPM] An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals, in Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals, edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge, 3rd edition revised by P. H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.[Page references above are to this edition.]
Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals, edited by Tom L. Beauchamp, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
[HL] The Letters of David Hume, edited by J.Y.T. Greig, 2 volumes, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1932.
[PW] The Philosophical Works of David Hume, edited by T. H. Green and T. H. Grose. 4 volumes, London: Longman, Green, 1874–75. [Page references below to individual essays are to volume 3 of this edition.]
[C] “Of Commerce,” in PW, Volume 3.
[CL] “Of Civil Liberty,” in PW, Volume 3.
[DOT] “Of the Delicacy of Taste and Passion,” in PW, Volume 3.
[E] “Of Eloquence,” in PW, Volume 3.
[OT] “Of Tragedy,” in PW, Volume 3.
[S] “The Sceptic,” in PW, Volume 3.
[SOT] “Of the Standard of Taste,” in PW, Volume 3.
[SRW] “Of Simplicity and Refinement in Writing,” in PW, Volume 3.

Works on Hume’s Aesthetics

  • Baceski, Tina (2013). “Hume on Art Critics, Wise Men, and the Virtues of Taste,” Hume Studies, 39: 233–56. (Scholar)
  • Baxter, Donald L. M. (1990). “Hume on Virtue, Beauty, Composites, and Secondary Qualities,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 71: 103–18. (Scholar)
  • Brown, Stuart Gerry (1938). “Observations on Hume’s Theory of Taste,” English Studies, 20: 193–98. (Scholar)
  • Budd, Malcolm (1991). “Hume’s Tragic Emotions,” Hume Studies, 17: 93–106. (Scholar)
  • Carroll, Noël (1984). “Hume’s Standard of Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 43: 181–94. (Scholar)
  • Cohen, Ralph (1962). “The Transformation of Passion: A Study of Hume’s Theories of Tragedy,‘Antinomy of Taste’,” Philological Quarterly, 41: 450–64. (Scholar)
  • Cohen, Ted 1994). “Partial Enchantment in Hume’s Essay on Taste,” in Robert Yanal (ed.), Institutions of Art: Reconsiderations of George Dickie’s Philosophy, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 145–56. (Scholar)
  • Costelloe, Timothy M. (2003). “Hume, Kant, and the ‘Antinomy of Taste’,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 41: 165–85. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2007). Aesthetics and Morals in the Philosophy of David Hume (Routledge Studies in Eighteenth Century Philosophy), London: Routledge. (Scholar)
  • Dadlez, Eva M. (2002). “The Vicious Habits of Entirely Fictitious People: Hume on the Moral Evaluation of Art,” Philosophy and Literature, 26: 143–56. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2004).“Pleased and Afflicted: Hume on the Paradox of Tragic Pleasure,” Hume Studies, 30: 213–36. (Scholar)
  • Dickie, George (2003). “James Shelley on Critical Principles,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 43: 57–64. (Scholar)
  • Durà-Vilà, Víctor (2014). “Courage in Art Appreciation: A Humean Perspective,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 54 (1): 77–95. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2015). “Shelley on Hume’s Standard of Taste and the Impossibility of Sound Disagreement among the Ideal Critics,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 73 (3): 341–45. (Scholar)
  • Foot, Philippa (1966). “Hume on Moral Judgment,” in David F. Pears (ed.), David Hume: A Symposium, London: Macmillan, 67–76. (Scholar)
  • Galgut, Elisa (2001). “The Poetry and the Pity: Hume’s Account of Tragic Pleasure,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 41: 411–24. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2012). “Hume’s Aesthetic Standard,” Hume Studies, 38: 183–200. (Scholar)
  • Gracyk, Theodore (1994). “Rethinking Hume’s Standard of Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 52: 168–82. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2011). “Delicacy in Hume’s Aesthetic Theory,” Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 9: 1–16. (Scholar)
  • Grant, James (2014). “Hume, David. Theory of Beauty,” in Michael Kelly (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, Volume 3: 368–72. (Scholar)
  • Guyer, Paul (2005). “Beauty and Utility in Eighteenth-Century Aesthetics,” in Paul Guyer, Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 110–28. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2005).“The Standard of Taste and the ‘Most Ardent Desire of Society’,” in Paul Guyer, Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 37–74. (Scholar)
  • Hester, Marcus (1979). “Hume on Principles and Perceptual Ability,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 37: 295–302. (Scholar)
  • Jones, Peter (1976).“Hume’s Aesthetics Reassessed,” Philosophical Quarterly, 26: 48–62. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2009). “Hume on the Arts and ‘The Standard of Taste’: Texts and Contexts,” in David Fate Norton and Jacqueline Tylor (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Hume, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 414–46. (Scholar)
  • Kivy, Peter (1967). “Hume’s Standard of Taste: Breaking the Circle,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 7: 57–66. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1983). “Hume’s Neighbor’s Wife: An Essay in the Evolution of Hume’s Aesthetics,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 23: 195–208. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2011). “Remarks on the Varieties of Prejudice in Hume’s Essay on Taste,” Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 9: 111–15. (Scholar)
  • Korsmeyer, Carolyn (1976). “Hume and the Foundations of Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 35: 201–15. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1995). “Gendered Concepts and Hume’s Standard of Taste,” in P. Z. Brand and Carolyn Korsmeyer (eds.), Feminism and Tradition in Aesthetics, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 49–65. (Scholar)
  • Kulenkampff, Jens (1990). “The Objectivity of Taste: Hume and Kant,” Noûs, 24: 93–100. (Scholar)
  • Levinson, Jerrold (2002). “Hume’s Standard of Taste: The Real Problem,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 60: 227–238. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2003). “The Real Problem Sustained: Reply to Wieand”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 61: 398–99. (Scholar)
  • MacLachlan, Christopher (1986). “Hume and the Standard of Taste”, Hume Studies, 12: 18–38. (Scholar)
  • MacMillan, Claude (1986). “Hume, Points of View and Aesthetic Judgments”, The Journal of Value Inquiry, 20: 109–23. (Scholar)
  • Marshall, David (1995). “Arguing by Analogy: Hume’s Standard of Taste,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 28: 323-43. (Scholar)
  • Mason, Michelle (2001). “Moral Prejudice and Aesthetic Deformity: Rereading Hume’s ‘Of the Standard of Taste’,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 59: 59–71. (Scholar)
  • Mothersill, Mary (1997). “In Defense of Hume and the Causal Theory of Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 55: 312–17. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1984). “Hume: ‘Of the Standard of Taste’,” in Beauty Restored, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 177–208. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2014). “Hume, David. ‘Of the Standard of Taste,’” in Michael Kelly (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, Volume 3: 364–68. (Scholar)
  • Neill, Alex (1998). “‘An Unaccountable Pleasure’: Hume on Tragedy and the Passions,” Hume Studies, 24: 335–354. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1992). “Yanal and Others on Hume on Tragedy,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 50: 151–154. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1999) “Hume’s ‘Singular Phænomenon’,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 39: 112–125. (Scholar)
  • Noxon, James (1961). “Hume’s Opinion of Critics,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 20: 157–62. (Scholar)
  • Osborne, Harold (1967). “Hume’s Standard and the Diversity of Aesthetic Taste,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 7: 50–56. (Scholar)
  • Perricone, Christopher (1995). “The Body and Hume’s Standard of Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 53: 371–8. (Scholar)
  • Ribeiro, Brian (2007). “Hume’s Standard of Taste and the de gustibus Sceptic,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 47: 16–28. (Scholar)
  • Rose, Mary Carman (1976). “The Importance of Hume in the History of Western Aesthetics,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 16: 218–29. (Scholar)
  • Ross, Stephanie (2008). “Humean Critics: Real or Ideal?,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 48: 20–28. (Scholar)
  • Saccamano, Neil (2011). “Aesthetically Non-Dwelling: Sympathy, Property, and the House of Beauty in Hume’s Treatise,” Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 9: 37–58. (Scholar)
  • Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey (1994). “On Why Hume’s ‘General Point of View’ isn’t Ideal – and Shouldn’t Be,” Social Philosophy and Policy, 11: 202–28. (Scholar)
  • Schier, Flint (1986–87). “Hume and the Aesthetics of Agency,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 87: 121–35. (Scholar)
  • Shelley, James (1994). “Hume’s Double Standard of Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 52: 437–45. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1998). “Hume and the Nature of ‘Taste’,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 56: 29–38. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2002). “The Character and Role of Principles in the Evaluation of Art,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 42; 37–51. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2004). “Hume’s Principles of Taste: A Reply to Dickie,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 44: 84–89. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2011). “Hume and the Value of the Beautiful,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 51: 213–22. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2013). “Hume and the Verdict of True Judges,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 71 (2): 145–53. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2015). “When True Judges Differ: Reply to Durà-Vilà,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 73 (3): 345–48. (Scholar)
  • Shiner, Roger A. (1996). “Hume and the Causal Theory of Taste,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 54: 237–49. (Scholar)
  • Shusterman, Richard (1989). “Of the Scandal of Taste: Social Privilege as Nature in the Aesthetic Theories of Hume and Kant,” Philosophical Forum, 20: 211–29. (Scholar)
  • Siebert, Donald T. (1989). “The Sentimental Sublime in Hume’s History of England,” Review of English Studies New Series, 40: 352–72. (Scholar)
  • Stradella, Alessandra (2012). “The Fiction of the Standard of Taste: David Hume on the Social Constitution of Beauty,” The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 46 (4): 32–47. (Scholar)
  • Sverdlik, Steven (1986). “Hume’s Key and Aesthetic Rationality,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 45: 69–76. (Scholar)
  • Taylor, Jacqueline (2008). “Hume on Beauty and Virtue,” in Elisabeth Radcliffe (ed.), A Companion to Hume, Oxford: Blackwell, 273–92. (Scholar)
  • Townsend, Dabney (2001). Hume’s Aesthetic Theory: Taste and Sentiment, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2013). “Hume’s Aesthetic Move: The Legitimization of Sentiment.” The European Legacy: Toward New Paradigms, 18 (5): 552–562. (Scholar)
  • Wieand, Jeffrey (1984). “Hume’s Two Standards of Taste,” Philosophical Quarterly, 34: 129–42. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2003). “Hume’s Real Problem,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 61: 395–98. (Scholar)
  • Williams, Christopher (2007). “Some Questions in Hume’s Aesthetics,” Philosophy Compass, 2: 157–69. (Scholar)
  • Winegar, Reed (2011). “Good Sense, Art, and Morality in Hume’s ‘Standard of Taste,’” Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 9: 17–35. (Scholar)
  • Yanal, Robert J. (1991). “Hume and Others on the Paradox of Tragedy,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 49: 75–76. (Scholar)
  • Zangwill, Nick (2001). “Hume, Taste, and Teleology,” in The Metaphysics of Beauty, Ithaca: Cornell University Press: 149–65. (Scholar)

Related Works on Hume and His Context

Generated Tue Jun 27 08:42:18 2017