Primary Sources

• [THN] 1739–40, A Treatise of Human Nature, David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Citations by paragraph. (Scholar)
• [EHU] 1748, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding Tom L. Beauchamp (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. Citations by paragraph. (Scholar)
• [EPM] 1751, An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, Tom L. Beauchamp (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. Citations by paragraph. (Scholar)
• [HE] 1754–61, The History of England from the Invasion of Julius Caesar to the Revolution in 1688, foreword by William B. Todd, 6 vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1983. Citations by volume and page number. [HE available online] (Scholar)
• [NHR] 1757, The Natural History of Religion, Tom L. Beauchamp (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Citations by paragraph. (Scholar)
• [EMPL] 1758, Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, edited and with a foreword, notes, and glossary by Eugene F. Miller. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1985, revised edition. Citations by page-number. [EMPL available online] (Scholar)
• [Dialogues] 1779, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, edited with an introduction and notes by Martin Bell, London: Penguin Books, 1990. Citations by section. (Scholar)
• [Letters] The Letters of David Hume, 2 vols., J.Y.T. Greig (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1932.

Secondary Sources

• Anstey, Peter R., 2005, “Experimental Versus Speculative Natural Philosophy”, in The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century, Peter R. Anstey and John A. Schuster (eds.), (Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 19), Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 215–242. doi:10.1007/1-4020-3703-1_9 (Scholar)
• Barfoot, Michael, 1990, “Hume and The Culture of Science in The Early Eighteenth Century”, in M.A. Stewart (ed.), Studies in the Philosophy of Scottish Enlightenment, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 151–190. (Scholar)
• Beebee, Helen, 2006, Hume on Causation, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Belkind, Ori, 2019, “In Defense of Newtonian Induction: Hume’s Problem of Induction and the Universalization of Primary Qualities”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 9(1): art. 14. doi:10.1007/s13194-018-0241-5 (Scholar)
• Bell, Martin, 1997, “Hume and Causal Power: The Influences of Malebranche and Newton”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 5(1): 67–86. doi:10.1080/09608789708570956 (Scholar)
• Bennett, Jonathan, 2001, Learning from Six Philosophers, 2 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Biener, Zvi and Eric Schliesser (eds.), 2014, Newton and Empiricism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199337095.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Boehm, Miren, 2016, “Hume’s Foundational Project in the Treatise”, European Journal of Philosophy, 24(1): 55–77. doi:10.1111/ejop.12056 (Scholar)
• –––, 2019, “Causality and Hume’s Foundational Project”, The Humean Mind, in Angela M. Coventry & Alexander Sager (eds.), London: Routledge, 110-123. (Scholar)
• Broughton, Janet, 1987, “Hume’s Ideas about Necessary Connection”, Hume Studies 13(2): 217–244. (Scholar)
• Cohen, I. Bernard, 1980, The Newtonian Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511665370 (Scholar)
• Cohen, I. Bernard and George E. Smith (eds), 2002, The Cambridge Companion to Newton, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/ccol0521651778 (Scholar)
• Demeter, Tamás, 2016, David Hume and the Culture of Scottish Newtonianism: Methodology and Ideology in Enlightenment Inquiry. Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004327320 (Scholar)
• –––, 2019a, “Hume on the Social Construction of Mathematical Knowledge”, Synthese, 196(9): 3615–3631. doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1655-x (Scholar)
• –––, 2019b, “Hume’s Science of Mind and Newtonianism”, in The Oxford Handbook of Newton, Eric Schliesser and Chris Smeenk (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199930418.013.19 (Scholar)
• Donovan, Arthur, 1975, Philosophical Chemistry in the Scottish Enlightenment, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. (Scholar)
• Ducheyne, Steffen, 2012, “The Main Business of Natural Philosophy”: Isaac Newton’s Natural-Philosophical Methodology, (Archimedes 29), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2126-5 (Scholar)
• Emerson, Roger, 2009, “Hume’s Intellectual Development: Part II”, in his Essays on David Hume, Medical Men and the Scottish Enlightenment, Aldershot: Ashgate, 103–126. (Scholar)
• Fontenelle, Bernard le Bovier de, 1728, “The Life of Sir Isaac Newton; with an Account of his Writings”, London, transcribed by David R. Wilkins, 2002. [Fontenelle 1728 available online] (Scholar)
• Force, James, 1987, “Hume’s Interest in Newton and Science”, Hume Studies, 13(2): 166–217. (Scholar)
• Garrett, Don, 1997, Cognition and Commitment in Hume’s Philosophy, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Guicciardini, Nicolò, 2009, Isaac Newton on Mathematical Certainty and Method, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Harris, James, 2015, Hume: An Intellectual Biography, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Hazony, Yoram, 2014, “Newtonian Explanatory Reduction and Hume’s System of the Sciences”, in Biener & Schliesser 2014: 138–170. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199337095.003.0007 (Scholar)
• Hazony, Yoram and Eric Schliesser, 2016, “Newton and Hume”, in The Oxford Handbook of Hume, Paul Russell (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 673–707. (Scholar)
• Hurlbutt, Robert H., 1985, Hume, Newton, and the Design Argument, revised edition, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. (Scholar)
• Janiak, Andrew., 2007, “Newton and the Reality of Force”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 45(1): 127–147. doi:10.1353/hph.2007.0010 (Scholar)
• Kemp Smith, Norman, 1941, The Philosophy of David Hume, London: Macmillan. (Scholar)
• Landy, David, 2017, Hume’s Science of Human Nature: Scientific Realism, Reason, and Substantial Explanation, London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315145242 (Scholar)
• Maclaurin, Colin, 1775, An Account of Sir Isaac Newton’s Philosophical Discoveries, 3rd edition, London. (Scholar)
• Martin, Marie A., 1993, “The Rational Warrant for Hume’s General Rules”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 31(2): 245–257. doi:10.1353/hph.1993.0035 (Scholar)
• McGuire, J.E., 1970a, “Atoms and the ‘Analogy of Nature’: Newton’s Third Rule of Philosophizing”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 1(1): 3–58. doi:10.1016/0039-3681(70)90024-5 (Scholar)
• –––, 1970b, “Newton’s ‘Principles of Philosophy’: An Intended Preface for the 1704 Opticks and a Related Draft Fragment”, The British Journal for the History of Science, 5(2): 178–186. doi:10.1017/s000708740001092x (Scholar)
• –––, 1972, “Boyle’s Conception of Nature”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 33(4): 523–542. doi:10.2307/2708855 (Scholar)
• Meeker, Kevin, 2007, “Hume on Knowledge, Certainty and Probability: Anticipating the Disintegration of the Analytic/Synthetic Divide?”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 88(2): 226–242. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0114.2007.00288.x (Scholar)
• Millican, Peter, 1995, “Hume’s Argument Concerning Induction: Structure and Interpretation”, in David Hume: Critical Assessments, Stanely Tweyman (ed.), London: Routledge, vol. 2, 91–144. (Scholar)
• Newman, Rosemary, 1981, “Hume on Space and Geometry”, Hume Studies, 7(1): 1–31. (Scholar)
• Newton, Isaac, 1671/72, “A Letter of Mr. Isaac Newton, Professor of the Mathematicks in the University of Cambridge; Containing His New Theory about Light and Colors: Sent by the Author to the Publisher from Cambridge, Febr. 6. 1671/72; in Order to Be Communicated to the R. Society”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 6(80): 3075–3087. doi:10.1098/rstl.1671.0072 (Scholar)
• –––, [Principia] 1687, Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, London, second edition 1713, third edition 1726. (Scholar)
• –––, 1704, Opticks: or, A Treatise of the Reflexions, Refractions, Inflexions and Colours of Light, London. (Scholar)
• –––, 1728, rev. edition 1731 [1969], A Treatise of the System of the World (De mundi systemate), facs. repr., with intro. by I. B. Cohen, London.
• –––, 2004, Isaac Newton: Philosophical Writings, Andrew Janiak (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809293 (Scholar)
• Noxon, James, 1973, Hume’s Philosophical Development: A Study of His Methods, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Penelhum, Terence, 2000, Themes in Hume: The Self, the Will, Religion, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Perinetti, Dario, 2018, “Hume at La Flèche: Skepticism and the French Connection”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 56(1): 45–74. doi:10.1353/hph.2018.0002 (Scholar)
• de Pierris, Graciela, 2001, “Hume’s Pyrrhonian Skepticism and the Belief in Causal Laws”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 39(3): 351–383. doi:10.1353/hph.2003.0121 (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, “Causation as a Philosophical Relation in Hume”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 64(3): 499–545. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00159.x (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, “Hume and Locke on Scientific Methodology: The Newtonian Legacy”, Hume Studies 32(2): 277–329. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015, Ideas, Evidence, and Method: Hume’s Skepticism and Naturalism Concerning Knowledge and Causation, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716785.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Read, Rupert and Kenneth A. Richman (eds.), 2000, The New Hume Debate, London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203469989 (Scholar)
• Reid, Thomas, 1764, An Inquiry into the Human Mind, Derek R. Brookes (ed.), Edinburgh: Edinurgh University Press. doi:10.1093/actrade/9780748607228.book.1 (Scholar)
• Russell, Paul, 2008, The Riddle of Hume’s Treatise: Skepticism, Naturalism, and Irreligion, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195110333.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Ryan, Todd, 2003, “Hume’s Argument for the Temporal Priority of Causes”, Hume Studies, 29(1): 29–41. (Scholar)
• Sargent, Rose-Mary, 1995, The Diffident Naturalist: Robert Boyle and the Philosophy of Experiment, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Schabas, Margaret, 2001, “David Hume on Experimental Natural Philosophy, Money, and Fluids”, History of Political Economy, 33(3): 411–435. (Scholar)
• Schliesser, Eric, 2004, “Hume’s Missing Shade of Blue Reconsidered from a Newtonian Perspective”, Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 2(2): 164–175. doi:10.3366/jsp.2004.2.2.164 (Scholar)
• –––, 2005a, “Some Principles of Adam Smith’s Newtonian Methods in the Wealth of Nations”, in A Research Annual, Warren J. Samuels, Jeff E. Biddle, and Ross B. Emmett (eds), (Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 23 part 1), Bingley: Emerald (MCB UP ), 33–74. doi:10.1016/s0743-4154(05)23002-x (Scholar)
• –––, 2005b, “Wonder in the Face of Scientific Revolutions: Adam Smith on Newton’s ‘Proof’ of Copernicanism”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 13(4): 697–732. doi:10.1080/09608780500293042 (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Two Definitions of ‘Cause,’ Newton, and The Significance of the Humean Distinction Between Natural and Philosophical Relations”, Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 5(1): 83–101. doi:10.3366/jsp.2007.5.1.83 (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “Hume’s Attack on Newton’s Philosophy”, Enlightenment and Dissent, 25: 167–203. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “Newton’s Challenge to Philosophy: A Programmatic Essay”, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 1(1): 101–128. doi:10.1086/658906 (Scholar)
• Shapiro, Alan E., 2004, “Newton’s ‘Experimental Philosophy’”, Early Science and Medicine, 9(3): 185–217. doi:10.1163/1573382042176254 (Scholar)
• Slavov, Matias, 2016, “Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Elements in Hume”, Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 14(3): 275–296. doi:10.3366/jsp.2016.0143 (Scholar)
• Smeenk, Chris and Eric Schliesser, 2013, “Newton’s Principia”, in The Oxford Handbook of the History of Physics, Jed Z. Buchwald and Robert Fox (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 109–165. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199696253.013.6 (Scholar)
• Smith, George E., 2002, “The Methodology of the Principia”, in Cohen and Smith 2002: 138–173. doi:10.1017/ccol0521651778.005 (Scholar)
• Stein, Howard, 1993, “On Philosophy and Natural Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 18: 177–201. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.1993.tb00264.x (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, “Newton’s Metaphysics” in Cohen and Smith 2002: 256–307. doi:10.1017/ccol0521651778.009 (Scholar)
• Stewart, M. A., 2005, “Hume’s Intellectual Development, 1711–1752”, in Impressions of Hume, Marina Frasca-Spada and P. J. E. Kail (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 11–58. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199256525.003.0002 (Scholar)
• Stroud, Barry, 1977, Hume, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Tapper, Alan, 2002, “Reid and Priestley on Method and the Mind”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 52(209): 511–525. doi:10.1111/1467-9213.00283 (Scholar)
• Winkler, Kenneth P., 2000, “The New Hume”, in Read and Richman 2000: 52–87. (Scholar)
• Wright, John P., 1983, The Skeptical Realism of David Hume, Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990, “Metaphysics and Physiology: Mind, Body and the Animal Economy in 18th-Century Scotland”, in Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment, M.A. Stewart (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 251–301. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, Hume’s “A Treatise of Human Nature”: An Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Zemplén, Gábor Á. and Tamás Demeter, 2010, “Being Charitable to Scientific Controversies: On the Demonstrativity of Newton’s Experimentum Crucis”, The Monist, 93(4): 640–656. doi:10.5840/monist201093436 (Scholar)