Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Hyperintensionality" by Francesco Berto and Daniel Nolan

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Anderson, Alan Ross, 1967, “Some Nasty Problems in the Formal Logic of Ethics”, Noûs, 1(4): 345–360. doi:10.2307/2214623 (Scholar)
Anderson, Alan Ross and Nuel D. Belnap, Jr., 1975, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Volume I, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Anderson, Alan Ross, Nuel D. Belnap, and J. Michael Dunn, 1992, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Volume II, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Bader, Ralf M., 2013, “Towards a Hyperintensional Theory of Intrinsicality”, Journal of Philosophy, 110(10): 525–563. doi:10.5840/jphil2013110109 (Scholar)
Badura, Christopher and Francesco Berto, 2019, “Truth in Fiction, Impossible Worlds, and Belief Revision”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 97(1): 178–193. doi:10.1080/00048402.2018.1435698 (Scholar)
Bacon, Andrew, 2018, “The Broadest Necessity”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 47(5): 733–783. doi:10.1007/s10992-017-9447-9 (Scholar)
Barcan [Marcus], Ruth C., 1947, “The Identity of Individuals in a Strict Functional Calculus of Second Order”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12(1): 12–15. doi:10.2307/2267171 (Scholar)
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua and Rudolf Carnap, 1952 [1964], “An Outline of a Theory of Semantic Information”, Technical Report 247, The Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Reprinted in Yehoshua Bar-Hillel’s Language and Information: Selected Essays on Their Theory and Application, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1964, pp. 221–274. (Scholar)
Baron, Sam, Mark Colyvan, and David Ripley, 2020, “A Counterfactual Approach to Explanation in Mathematics”, Philosophia Mathematica, 28(1): 1–34. doi:10.1093/philmat/nkz023 (Scholar)
Barwise, Jon, 1997, “Information and Impossibilities”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 38(4): 488–515. doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1039540766 (Scholar)
Barwise, Jon and John Perry, 1983, Situations and Attitudes, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
Barwise, Jon and Jerry Seligman, 1997, Information Flow: The Logic of Distributed Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511895968 (Scholar)
Bealer, George, 1979, “Theories of Properties, Relations, and Propositions”, The Journal of Philosophy, 76(11): 634–648. doi:10.2307/2025697 (Scholar)
Bernstein, Sara, 2016, “Omission Impossible”, Philosophical Studies, 173(10): 2575–2589. doi:10.1007/s11098-016-0672-9 (Scholar)
Berto, Francesco, 2019, “Simple Hyperintensional Belief Revision”, Erkenntnis, 84(3): 559–575. doi:10.1007/s10670-018-9971-1 (Scholar)
Berto, Francesco, Rohan French, Graham Priest, and David Ripley, 2018, “Williamson on Counterpossibles”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 47(4): 693–713. doi:10.1007/s10992-017-9446-x (Scholar)
Berto, Francesco and Mark Jago, 2019, Impossible Worlds, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198812791.001.0001 (Scholar)
Branquinho, Joāo, 1990, “Are Salmon’s ‘guises’ Disguised Fregean Senses?”, Analysis, 50(1): 19–24. doi:10.1093/analys/50.1.19 (Scholar)
Bjerring, Jens Christian, 2014, “On Counterpossibles”, Philosophical Studies, 168(2): 327–353. doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0133-7 (Scholar)
Bjerring, Jens Christian and Wolfgang Schwarz, 2017, “Granularity Problems”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 67(266): 22–37. doi:10.1093/pq/pqw028 (Scholar)
Bjerring, Jens Christian and Mattias Skipper, 2019, “A Dynamic Solution to the Problem of Logical Omniscience”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 48(3): 501–521. doi:10.1007/s10992-018-9473-2 (Scholar)
Brogaard, Berit and Joe Salerno, 2013, “Remarks on Counterpossibles”, Synthese, 190(4): 639–660. doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0196-6 (Scholar)
Chalmers, David, 1996, The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Ciardelli, Ivano, Jeroen Groenendijk, and Floris Roelofsen, 2013, “Inquisitive Semantics: A New Notion of Meaning: Inquisitive Semantics”, Language and Linguistics Compass, 7(9): 459–476. doi:10.1111/lnc3.12037 (Scholar)
Copeland, B. J., 1980, “The Trouble Anderson and Belnap Have with Relevance”, Philosophical Studies, 37(4): 325–334. doi:10.1007/bf00354901 (Scholar)
Cresswell, M. J., 1970, “Classical Intensional Logics”, Theoria, 36(3): 347–372. doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.1970.tb00433.x (Scholar)
–––, 1975, “Hyperintensional Logic”, Studia Logica, 34(1): 25–38. doi:10.1007/bf02314421 (Scholar)
–––, 2002, “Why Propositions Have No Structure”, Noûs, 36(4): 643–662. doi:10.1111/1468-0068.00405 (Scholar)
Davidson, Donald, 1968, “On Saying That”, Synthese, 19(1–2): 130–146. doi:10.1007/bf00568054 (Scholar)
Davies, Martin and Lloyd Humberstone, 1980, “Two Notions of Necessity”, Philosophical Studies, 38(1): 1–30. doi:10.1007/bf00354523 (Scholar)
Dretske, Fred, 1981, “The Pragmatic Dimension of Knowledge”, Philosophical Studies, 40(3): 363–378. doi:10.1007/bf00646423 (Scholar)
Duncan, Michael, Kristie Miller, and James Norton, 2017, “Is Grounding a Hyperintensional Phenomenon?”, Analytic Philosophy, 58(4): 297–329. doi:10.1111/phib.12105 (Scholar)
Dunn, J. Michael, 1987, “Relevant Predication 1: The Formal Theory”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 16(4): 347–381. doi:10.1007/bf00431183 (Scholar)
–––, 1990a, “Relevant Predication 2: Intrinsic Properties and Internal Relations”, Philosophical Studies, 60(3): 177–206. doi:10.1007/bf00367469 (Scholar)
–––, 1990b, “Relevant Predication 3: Essential Properties”, in Truth or Consequences: Essays in Honor of Nuel Belnap, J. Michael Dunn and Anil Gupta (eds.), Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 77–95. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-0681-5_6 (Scholar)
–––, 2015, “The Relevance of Relevance to Relevance Logic”, in Logic and Its Applications, Mohua Banerjee and Shankara Narayanan Krishna (eds.), (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8923), Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 11–29. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45824-2_2 (Scholar)
Dunn, J. Michael and Greg Restall, 2002, “Relevance Logic”, in Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Dov M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), second edition, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, Volume 6, pp. 1–128. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0460-1_1 (Scholar)
Duží, Marie, Bjørn Jespersen, and Pavel Materna, 2010, Procedural Semantics for Hyperintensional Logic: Foundations and Applications of Transparent Intensional Logic, (Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science 17), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8812-3 (Scholar)
Duží, Marie and Bjørn Jespersen, 2015, “Transparent Quantification into Hyperintensional Objectual Attitudes”, Synthese, 192(3): 635–677. doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0578-z (Scholar)
Eddon, Maya, 2011, “Intrinsicality and Hyperintensionality”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 82(2): 314–336. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00414.x (Scholar)
Fagin, Ronald, Joseph Y. Halpern, Yoram Moses and Moshe Vardi, 1995, Reasoning About Knowledge, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Faroldi, Federico L. G., 2019, Hyperintensionality and Normativity, Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03487-0 (Scholar)
Fine, Kit, 1994, “Essence and Modality: The Second Philosophical Perspectives Lecture”, Philosophical Perspectives, 8: 1–16. doi:10.2307/2214160 (Scholar)
–––, 2001, “The Question of Realism”, Philosopher’s Imprint, 1(June): art. 2. [Fine 2001 available online] (Scholar)
–––, 2012, “Counterfactuals Without Possible Worlds”, Journal of Philosophy, 109(3): 221–246. doi:10.5840/jphil201210938 (Scholar)
–––, 2016, “Angellic Content”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 45(2): 199–226. doi:10.1007/s10992-015-9371-9 (Scholar)
–––, 2017, “Truthmaker Semantics”, in A Companion to the Philosophy of Language (Vol. 2), Bob Hale, Crispin Wright, and Alexander Miller (eds.), 2nd ed., Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 556–577. doi:10.1002/9781118972090.ch22 (Scholar)
–––, 2020, “Yablo on Subject-Matter”, Philosophical Studies, 177(1): 129–171. doi:10.1007/s11098-018-1183-7 (Scholar)
Forbes, Graeme, 1987, “Review of Frege’s Puzzle, by Nathan Salmon”, The Philosophical Review, 96(3): 455–458. doi:10.2307/2185233 (Scholar)
García-Carpintero, Manuel and Josep Maciá (eds), 2006, Two-Dimensional Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Gaskin, Richard, 2008, The Unity of the Proposition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239450.001.0001 (Scholar)
Gioulatou, Iliana, 2016, Hyperintensionality, Master of Science in Logic thesis, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC), Universiteit van Amsterdam. [Gioulatou 2016 available online] (Scholar)
Goble, Lou, 1999, “Deontic Logic with Relevance”, in P. McNamara and H. Prakken (eds.), Norms, Logics and Information Systems: New Studies on Deontic Logic and Computer Science, Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 331–345. (Scholar)
Goddard, L., 1977, “The Paradoxes of Confirmation and the Nature of Natural Laws”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 27(107): 97–113. doi:10.2307/2219421 (Scholar)
Hawke, Peter, 2018, “Theories of Aboutness”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 96(4): 697–723. doi:10.1080/00048402.2017.1388826 (Scholar)
Hintikka, Jaakko, 1962, Knowledge and Belief, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1975, “Impossible Possible Worlds Vindicated”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 4(4): 475–484. doi:10.1007/bf00558761 (Scholar)
Hoffmann-Kolss, Vera, 2015, “On a Sufficient Condition for Hyperintensionality”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 65(260): 336–354. doi:10.1093/pq/pqv021 (Scholar)
–––, 2019, “Defining Qualitative Properties”, Erkenntnis, 84(5): 995–1010. doi:10.1007/s10670-018-9991-x (Scholar)
Hornischer, Levin, 2017, Hyperintensionality and Synonymy, M.S. in Logic Thesis, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC), Universiteit van Amsterdam. [Hornischer 2017 available online] (Scholar)
–––, 2020, “Logics of Synonymy”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 49: 767–805. doi:10.1007/s10992-019-09537-5 (Scholar)
Jackson, Frank, 1994, “Armchair Metaphysics”, in Philosophy in Mind: The Place of Philosophy in the Study of Mind, Michaelis Michael and John O’Leary-Hawthorne (eds.), (Philosophical Studies Series 60), Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 23–42. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1008-2_3 (Scholar)
Jago, Mark, 2009, “Logical Information and Epistemic Space”, Synthese, 167(2): 327–341. doi:10.1007/s11229-008-9411-x (Scholar)
–––, 2014, The Impossible: An Essay on Hyperintensionality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198709008.001.0001 (Scholar)
–––, 2015, “Impossible Worlds”, Noûs, 49(4): 713–728. doi:10.1111/nous.12051 (Scholar)
Jenkins, C.S., 2011, “Is Metaphysical Dependence Irreflexive?”, Monist, 94(2): 267–276. doi:10.5840/monist201194213 (Scholar)
Jenkins, C.S. and Daniel Nolan, 2012, “Disposition Impossible”, Noûs, 46(4): 732–753. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2011.00831.x (Scholar)
Jespersen, Bjørn, 2010, “How Hyper Are Hyperpropositions?”, Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(2): 96–106. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818x.2009.00181.x (Scholar)
Jespersen, Bjørn and Marie Duží, 2015, “Introduction”, Special issue on hyperintensionality, Synthese, 192(3): 525–534. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0665-9 (Scholar)
Kahneman, Daniel, 2011, Thinking, Fast and Slow, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. (Scholar)
Kaplan, David, 1989, “Demonstratives”, in Themes from Kaplan., Joseph Almog, John Perry, and Howard Wettstein (eds.), New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 481–563. (Scholar)
Keenan, Edward L. and Leonard M. Faltz, 1984, Boolean Semantics for Natural Language, (Synthese Language Library 23), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-6404-4 (Scholar)
King, Jeffrey C., 1995, “Structured Propositions and Complex Predicates”, Noûs, 29(4): 516–535. doi:10.2307/2216285 (Scholar)
Kiourti, Ira George, 2010, Real Impossible Worlds: The Bounds of Possibility, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of St Andrews. [Kiourti 2010 available online] (Scholar)
Kment, Boris, 2014, Modality and Explanatory Reasoning, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604685.001.0001 (Scholar)
Kocurek, Alexander W., Ethan Jerzak, and Rachel Etta Rudolph, 2020, “Against Conventional Wisdom”, Philosopher’s Imprint, 20: art. 22. [Kocurek et al. 2020 available online] (Scholar)
Kratzer, Angelika, 1986, “Conditionals”, in Papers from the Parasessions on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory, Anne M. Farley, Peter Farley and Karl-Erik McCollough (eds.), Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 115–135. (Scholar)
Kripke, Saul A., 1965, “Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic II: Non-normal Modal Propositional Calculi”, in J. W. Addison, Leon Henkin, and Alfred Tarski (eds.), 1965, The Theory of Models, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 206–20. (Scholar)
–––, 1980, Naming and Necessity, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
Leitgeb, Hannes, 2019, “HYPE: A System of Hyperintensional Logic (with an Application to Semantic Paradoxes)”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 48(2): 305–405. doi:10.1007/s10992-018-9467-0 (Scholar)
Lewis, David, 1973, Counterfactuals, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
–––, 1982, “Logic for Equivocators”, Noûs, 16(3): 431–441. doi:10.2307/2216219 (Scholar)
–––, 1986, On the Plurality of Worlds, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
–––, 1988, “Statements Partly about Observation”, Philosophical Papers, 17(1): 1–31. doi:10.1080/05568648809506282 (Scholar)
–––, 2004, “Letters to Beall and Priest”, in The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays, Graham Priest, J.C. Beall, and Bradley Armour-Garb (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 176–177. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199265176.003.0011 (Scholar)
Locke, Theodore D., forthcoming, “Counterpossibles for Modal Normativists”, Synthese, first online: 28 January 2019. doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02103-1 (Scholar)
Lycan, William G., 2001, Real Conditionals, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
MacBride, Fraser, 2012 [2020], “Truthmakers”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/truthmakers/>. (Scholar)
Mares, Edwin D., 1997, “Who’s Afraid of Impossible Worlds?”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 38(4): 516–526. doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1039540767 (Scholar)
–––, 2004, Relevant Logic: A Philosophical Interpretation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511520006 (Scholar)
Mares, Edwin D. and André Fuhrmann, 1995, “A Relevant Theory of Conditionals”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 24(6): 645–665. doi:10.1007/bf01306969 (Scholar)
Marshall, Dan, 2015, “Intrinsicality and Grounding”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 90(1): 1–19. doi:10.1111/phpr.12053 (Scholar)
Melchior, Guido, forthcoming, “Sensitivity, Safety, and Impossible Worlds”, Philosophical Studies, first online: 21 April 2020. doi:10.1007/s11098-020-01453-8 (Scholar)
Menzel, Christopher, 1993, “The Proper Treatment of Predication in Fine-Grained Intensional Logic”, Philosophical Perspectives, 7: 61–87. doi:10.2307/2214116 (Scholar)
Moltmann, Friederike, 2020, “Truthmaker Semantics for Natural Language: Attitude Verbs, Modals, and Intensional Transitive Verbs”, Theoretical Linguistics, 46(3–4): 159–200. (Scholar)
–––, forthcoming, “Situations, Alternatives, and the Semantics of ‘Cases’”, Linguistics and Philosophy, first online: 12 December 2019. doi:10.1007/s10988-019-09282-7 (Scholar)
Montague, Richard, 1970, “Universal Grammar”, Theoria, 36(3): 373–398. doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.1970.tb00434.x (Scholar)
Nolan, Daniel, 1997, “Impossible Worlds: A Modest Approach”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 38(4): 535–572. doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1039540769 (Scholar)
–––, 2003, “Defending a Possible-Worlds Account of Indicative Conditionals”, Philosophical Studies, 116(3): 215–269. doi:10.1023/b:phil.0000007243.60727.d4 (Scholar)
–––, 2013, “Impossible Worlds”, Philosophy Compass, 8(4): 360–372. doi:10.1111/phc3.12027 (Scholar)
–––, 2014, “Hyperintensional Metaphysics”, Philosophical Studies, 171(1): 149–160. doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0251-2 (Scholar)
–––, 2016a, “Chance and Necessity”, Philosophical Perspectives, 30(1): 294–308. doi:10.1111/phpe.12076 (Scholar)
–––, 2016b, “Conditionals and Curry”, Philosophical Studies, 173(10): 2629–2647. doi:10.1007/s11098-016-0666-7 (Scholar)
–––, 2018, “Reflections on Routley’s Ultralogic Program”, The Australasian Journal of Logic, 15(2): 407–430. doi:10.26686/ajl.v15i2.4866 (Scholar)
Osorio-Kupferblum, Naomi, 2016, “Aboutness”, Analysis, 76(4): 528–546. doi:10.1093/analys/anw027 (Scholar)
Plebani, Matteo and Giuseppe Spolaore, forthcoming, “Subject Matter: A Modest Proposal”, The Philosophical Quarterly, first online: 7 August 2020. doi:110.1093/pq/pqaa05 (Scholar)
Poggiolesi, Francesca, 2018, “On Constructing a Logic for the Notion of Complete and Immediate Formal Grounding”, Synthese, 195(3): 1231–1254. doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1265-z (Scholar)
–––, 2020, “Grounding Rules and (Hyper-)Isomorphic Formulas”, The Australasian Journal of Logic, 17(1): 70–80. doi:10.26686/ajl.v17i1.5694 (Scholar)
Priest, Graham, 1992, “What is a Non-Normal World?”, Logique et Analyse, 35: 291–302. (Scholar)
–––, 1997, “Sylvan’s Box: A Short Story and Ten Morals”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 38(4): 573–582. doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1039540770 (Scholar)
–––, 2008, An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, second edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. First edition 2001. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511801174 (Scholar)
Quine, W. V. O., 1953, “Three Grades of Modal Involvement”, in Proceedings of the XIth International Congress of Philosophy, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 14:65–81. Reprinted in Quine 1966: 156–174. doi:10.5840/wcp11195314450 (Scholar)
–––, 1956, “Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes”, The Journal of Philosophy, 53(5): 177–187. Reprinted in Quine 1966: 183–194. doi:10.2307/2022451 (Scholar)
–––, 1966, The Ways of Paradox, New York: Random House. (Scholar)
Rantala, Veikko., 1982, “Impossible Worlds Semantics and Logical Omniscience”, in Intensional Logic: Theory and Application (Acta Philosophica Fennica, 35), Ilkka Niiniluoto and Esa Saarinen (eds), Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica, pp. 106–115. (Scholar)
Read, Stephen, 1988, Relevant Logic: A Philosophical Examination of Inference, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
Restall, Greg, 1996a, “Truthmakers, Entailment and Necessity”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74(2): 331–340. doi:10.1080/00048409612347331 (Scholar)
–––, 1996b, “Information Flow and Relevant Logics”, in Jerry Seligman and Dag Westerståhl (eds.), Logic, Language and Computation (Volume 1), Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 463–78. (Scholar)
Ripley, David, 2012, “Structures and Circumstances: Two Ways to Fine-Grain Propositions”, Synthese, 189(1): 97–118. doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0100-4 (Scholar)
Routley, Richard, 1977, “Ultralogic as Universal?” The Relevance Logic Newsletter, 2(1): 50–90 and 2(2): 138–175. Reprinted in Routley 2019: 1–121. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91974-4_1">10.1007/978-3-319-91974-4_1 (Scholar)
–––, 1979, “The Semantical Structure of Fictional Discourse”, Poetics, 8(1–2): 3–30. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(79)90013-5 (Scholar)
–––, 1989, “Philosophical and Linguistic Inroads: Multiply Intensional Relevant Logics”, in Directions in Relevant Logic, Jean Norman and Richard Sylvan (eds.), Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 269–304. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1005-8_19 (Scholar)
–––, 2019, Ultralogic as Universal? The Sylvan Jungle—Volume 4, Zach Weber (ed.), (Synthese Library 396), Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91974-4 (Scholar)
Routley, Richard and Robert K. Meyer, 1973, “The Semantics of Entailment I”, in Hugues Leblanc (ed.), Truth, Syntax and Semantics, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 194–243. (Scholar)
Salmon [Salmón], Nathan, 1984, “Impossible Worlds”, Analysis, 44(3): 114–117. doi:10.1093/analys/44.3.114 (Scholar)
–––, 1986, Frege’s Puzzle, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2019, “Impossible Odds”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 99(3): 644–662. doi:10.1111/phpr.12517 (Scholar)
Schaffer, Jonathan, 2009, “On What Grounds What”, in David Manley, David J. Chalmers and Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 347–383. (Scholar)
Schellenberg, Susanna, 2012, “Sameness of Fregean Sense”, Synthese, 189(1): 163–175. doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0098-7 (Scholar)
Schnieder, Benjamin, 2011, “A Logic for ‘Because’”, The Review of Symbolic Logic, 4(3): 445–465. doi:10.1017/s1755020311000104 (Scholar)
Segerberg, Krister, 1973, “Two-Dimensional Modal Logic”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2(1): 77–96. doi:10.1007/bf02115610 (Scholar)
Skipper, Mattias and Jens Christian Bjerring, 2020, “Hyperintensional Semantics: A Fregean Approach”, Synthese, 197(8): 3535–3558. doi:10.1007/s11229-018-01900-4 (Scholar)
Soames, Scott, 1987, “Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content”, Philosophical Topics, 15(1): 47–87. (Scholar)
–––, 2008, “Why Propositions Cannot Be Sets of Truth-Supporting Circumstances”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 37(3): 267–276. doi:10.1007/s10992-007-9069-8 (Scholar)
Solaki, Anthia, Francesco Berto, and Sonja Smets, forthcoming, “The Logic of Fast and Slow Thinking”, Erkenntnis, first online: 1 June 2019. doi:10.1007/s10670-019-00128-z (Scholar)
Stalnaker, Robert C., 1968, “A Theory of Conditionals”, in Nicholas Rescher (ed.), Studies in Logical Theory, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 98–112. (Scholar)
–––, 1976, “Propositions”, in Alfred M. MacKay and Daniel D. Merrill (eds), Issues in the Philosophy of Language, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 79–91. (Scholar)
–––, 1978, “Assertion”, in Pragmatics (Syntax and Semantics 9), Peter Cole (ed.), New York: Academic Press, pp. 315–332. (Scholar)
–––, 1984, Inquiry, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1996, “Impossibilities”, Philosophical Topics, 24(1): 193–204. Reprinted with additional material in his, 2003, Ways a World Might Be: Metaphysical and Anti-Metaphysical Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 55–68. doi:10.5840/philtopics199624115 (Scholar)
–––, 2004, “Assertion Revisited: On the Interpretation of Two-Dimensional Modal Semantics”, Philosophical Studies, 118(1/2): 299–322. doi:10.1023/b:phil.0000019550.81145.34 (Scholar)
Stanojevic, Maja, 2009, “Cognitive Synonymy: A General Overview”, Facta Universitatis—Linguistics and Literature, 7: 193–200. (Scholar)
Sylvan, Richard and R. Nola, 1991, “Confirmation Without Paradoxes” in Gerhard Schurz and Georg J. W. Dorn (eds.), Advances in Scientific Philosophy, Leiden: Brill, pp. 5–44. (Scholar)
Tagawa, Takahiro and Jingde Cheng, 2002, “Deontic Relevant Logic: A Strong Relevant Logic Approach to Removing Paradoxes from Deontic Logic”, in PRICAI 2002: Trends in Artificial Intelligence, Mitsuru Ishizuka and Abdul Sattar (eds.), (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2417), Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 39–48. doi:10.1007/3-540-45683-x_7 (Scholar)
Tichý, Pavel, 1968, “Smysl a procedura”, Filosofický Casopis, 16: 222–232, translated as “Sense and procedure” in Vladimír Svoboda, Bjørn Jespersen, and Colin Cheyne (eds.), 2004, Pavel Tichý’s Collected Papers in Logic and Philosophy, Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago Press, pp. 77–92. (Scholar)
–––, 1971, “An Approach to Intensional Analysis”, Noûs, 5(3): 273–297. doi:10.2307/2214668 (Scholar)
–––, 1988, The Foundations of Frege’s Logic, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110849264 (Scholar)
Thaler, Richard H. and Cass R. Sunstein, 2008, Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
Thompson, Naomi, 2016, “Grounding and Metaphysical Explanation”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 116(3): 395–402. doi:10.1093/arisoc/aow012 (Scholar)
Thompson, Naomi and Darragh Byrne, 2019, “On Hyperintensional Metaphysics”, in Tobias Hansson Wahlberg and Robin Stenwall (eds.) Maurinian Truths: Essays in Honour of Anna-Sofia Maurin on her 50th Birthday, Lund: Lund University, pp. 151–158. (Scholar)
Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman, 1981, “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice”, Science, 211(4481): 453–458. doi:10.1126/science.7455683 (Scholar)
Van Fraassen, Bas C., 1969, “Facts and Tautological Entailments”, Journal of Philosophy, 66(15): 477–487. doi:10.2307/2024563 (Scholar)
–––, 1977, “The Only Necessity Is Verbal Necessity”, The Journal of Philosophy, 74(2): 71–85. doi:10.2307/2025572 (Scholar)
Wansing, Heinrich, 2017, “Remarks on the Logic of Imagination. A Step towards Understanding Doxastic Control through Imagination”, Synthese, 194(8): 2843–2861. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0945-4 (Scholar)
Weatherson, Brian, 2001, “Indicative and Subjunctive Conditionals”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 51(203): 200–216. doi:10.1111/j.0031-8094.2001.00224.x (Scholar)
Williamson, Timothy, 2007, The Philosophy of Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470696675 (Scholar)
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1921, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
Yablo, Stephen, 2014, Aboutness, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Zalta, Edward N., 1988, Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1997, “A Classically-Based Theory of Impossible Worlds”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 38(4): 640–660. doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1039540774 (Scholar)

Generated Sun Dec 3 13:34:20 2023

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...