Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Optimality-Theoretic and Game-Theoretic Approaches to Implicature" by Robert van Rooij and Michael Franke

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

  • Ahern, C. and R. Clark, 2014, ‘Diachronic Processes in Language as Signaling Under Conflicting Interests’, The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of EVOLANG10, E. A. Cartmill et al. (eds.), Singapore: World Scientific Press, 25–32. (Scholar)
  • Andreas, J. and D. Klein, 2016, ‘Reasoning about pragmatics with neural listeners and speakers’, Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1173–1182. (Scholar)
  • Aloni, M., 2007, ‘Expressing Ignorance or Indifference. Modal Implicatures in Bi-Directional Optimality Theory’, in B. ten Cate and Henk Zeevat (eds.), Logic, Language and Computation: Papers from the 6th International Tbilisi Symposium, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1–20. (Scholar)
  • Asher, N., I. Sher, and M. Williams, 2001, ‘Game Theoretical Foundations for Gricean Constraints’, in Proceedings of the 13th Amsterdam Colloquium, R. van Rooy and M. Stokhof (eds.), Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language, and Cognition, 31–37. (Scholar)
  • Benz, A., 2006, ‘Utility and relevance of answers’, in A. Benz, G. Jäger and R. van Rooij (eds.), Game Theory and Pragmatics, New York: Palgrave McMillan, 195–214. (Scholar)
  • Benz, A. and R. van Rooij, 2007, ‘Optimal Assertions, and what they implicate. A uniform game theoretic approach’, Topoi, 26: 63–78. (Scholar)
  • Bergen, L., R. Levy and N. D. Goodman, 2016, ‘Pragmatic Reasoning through Semantic Inference’, Semantics and Pragmatics, 9: 1–83. (Scholar)
  • Bergen, L. and N. D. Goodman, 2015, ‘The Strategic Use of Noise in Pragmatic Reasoning’, Topics in Cognitive Science, 7: 336–350. (Scholar)
  • Blutner, R., 1998, ‘Lexical Pragmatics’, Journal of Semantics, 15: 115–162. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000, ‘Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation’, Journal of Semantics, 17: 189–216. (Scholar)
  • Brochhagen, T., 2017, ‘Signalling under Uncertainty: Interpretative Alignment without a Common Prior’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 71: 471–496. (Scholar)
  • Brochhagen, T., M. Franke, and R. van Rooij, 2018, ‘Co-evolution of lexical meaning and pragmatic use’, Cognitive Science, 42(8): 2757–2789. (Scholar)
  • Burnett, H., 2019, ‘Signalling games, sociolinguistics and the construction of style’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 42: 419–450. (Scholar)
  • Carcassi, F., 2020, ‘The cultural evolution of scalar categorization’, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh. (Scholar)
  • Clark, R., 2012, Meaningful Games, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Cohn-Gordon, R., N. D. Goodman, and C. Potts, 2019, ‘An Incremental Iterated Response Model of Pragmatics’, Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics, New York: Linguistic Society of America, 81–90. (Scholar)
  • Degen, J., M. H. Tessler and N. D. Goodman, 2015, ‘Wonky worlds: Listeners revise world knowledge when utterances are odd’, in D. C. Noelle et al. (eds.), Proceedings of CogSci 37, 548–553. (Scholar)
  • Dekker, P. and R. van Rooij (2000). ‘Bi-Directional Optimality Theory: An Application of Game Theory’, Journal of Semantics 17, 217–242 (Scholar)
  • Ebert, C. and G. Jäger, 2009, ‘Pragmatic Rationalizability’, in A. Riester and T. Solstand (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 14, SFB 732, vol. 5, University of Stuttgart, 1–15. (Scholar)
  • Frank, M. C. and N. D. Goodman, 2012, ‘Predicting Pragmatic Reasoning in Language Games’, Science, 336: 998. (Scholar)
  • Franke, M., 2009, ‘Signal to Act’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011, ‘Quantity Implicatures, Exhaustive Interpretation, and Rational Conversation’, Semantics and Pragmatics, 4(1): 1–81. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2014a, ‘Pragmatic Reasoning about Unawareness’, Erkenntnis, 79: 729–767. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2014b, ‘On admissibility in game theoretic pragmatics: A reply to Pavan (2013)’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 37: 249–256. (Scholar)
  • Franke, M. and G. Jäger, 2012, ‘Bidirectional Optimization from Reasoning and Learning in Games’, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 21(1): 117–139 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2014, ‘Pragmatic Back-and-Forth Reasoning’, in S. Pistoia Reda (ed.), Semantics, Pragmatics and the Case of Scalar Implicatures, New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 170–200. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2016, ‘Probabilistic Pragmatics, or why Bayes’ Rule is Probably Important for Pragmatics’, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 35:3–44. (Scholar)
  • Franke, M., S. T. de Jager and R. van Rooij, 2012, ‘Relevance in Cooperation and Conflict’, Journal of Logic and Computation, 22: 23–54. (Scholar)
  • Franke, M. and R. van Rooij, 2015, ‘Strategies of Persuasion, Manipulation and Propaganda: Psychological and Social Aspects’, in J. van Benthem, S. Gosh and R. Verbrugge (eds.), Models of Strategic Reasoning: Logics, Games and Communities, Berlin: Springer, 255–291. (Scholar)
  • Gazdar, G., 1979, Pragmatics, London: Academic Press. (Scholar)
  • Grice, H.P., 1967, ‘Logic and conversation’, William James Lectures, Harvard University, reprinted in Studies in the Way of Words, 1989, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Goodman, N. D. and A. Stuhlmüller, 2013, ‘Knowledge and Implicature: Modeling Language Understanding as Social Cognition’, Topics in Cognitive Science, 5: 173–184. (Scholar)
  • Goodman, N. D. and M. C. Frank, 2016, ‘Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20: 818–829. (Scholar)
  • Horn, L., 1984, ‘Towards a new taxonomy of pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature’. In: D. Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, GURT84, 11–42, Washington; Georgetown University Press. (Scholar)
  • De Jaegher, K., 2008, ‘The evolution of Horn’s rule’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 15: 275–284. (Scholar)
  • De Jaegher, K. and R. van Rooij, 2014, ‘Game-Theoretic Pragmatics Under Conflicting and Common Interests’, Erkenntnis, 79: 769–820. (Scholar)
  • Jäger, G., 2002, ‘Some Notes on the Formal Properties of Bidirectional Optimality Theory’, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 11: 427–451. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2014, ‘Rationalizable Signaling’, Erkenntnis, 79: 673–706. (Scholar)
  • Kao, J. et al., 2014, ‘Nonliteral Understanding of Number Words’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 111(33): 12002–12007. (Scholar)
  • Levinson, S. C., 2000, Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Lewis, D., 1969, Convention, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Monroe, W., R. X. D. Hawkins, N. D. Goodman and C. Potts, 2017, ‘Colors in Context: A Pragmatic Neural Model for Grounded Language Understanding’, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Volume 5, pp. 325–338. doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00064 (Scholar)
  • Parikh, P., 1988, Language and strategic inference, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1991, ‘Communication and strategic inference’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 14: 473–513. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1992, ‘A Game-Theoretic Account of Implicature’, Proceedings of the 4th TARK Conference, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 85–94 [Parikh 1992 available online]. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000, ‘Communication, meaning, and interpretation’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 23: 185–212. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2001, The use of Language, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2010, Language and Equilibrium, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2019, Communication and Content, Berlin: Language Science Press. (Scholar)
  • Pavan, S., 2013, ‘Scalar Implicatures and Philosophy’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 36: 261–290. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2014, ‘Rationality in game-theoretic pragmatics: A response to Franke (2014)’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 37: 257–261. (Scholar)
  • Perea, A., 2012, Epistemic Game Theory: Reasoning and Choice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Potts, C., D. Lassiter, R. Levy and M.C. Frank, 2016, ‘Embedded implicatures as pragmatic inferences under compositional lexical uncertainty’, Journal of Semantics, 33: 755–802. (Scholar)
  • Prince, A. and P. Smolensky, 1993, Optimality Theory. Constraint interaction in generative grammar, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Qing, C., N. Goodman and D. Lassiter, 2016, ‘A Rational Speech-Act Model of Projective Content’, in Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2016). [Qing, et al. 2016 available online] (Scholar)
  • Rooij, R. van, 2004, ‘Signalling games select Horn strategies’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 27: 493–527. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2008, ‘Game Theory and Quantity Implicatures’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 15: 261–274. (Scholar)
  • Rothschild, D., 2013, ‘Game Theory and Scalar Implicatures’, Philosophical Review, 27: 438–478. (Scholar)
  • Sandholm, W. H., 2010, Population Games and Evolutionary Dynamics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Schulz, K., and R. van Rooij, 2006, ‘Pragmatic meaning and non-monotonic reasoning: the case of exhaustive interpretation’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 29: 205–250. (Scholar)
  • Stevens, J., 2016, ‘Focus Games’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 39: 395–441. (Scholar)
  • Stevens, J. and A. Benz, 2018, ‘Game-theoretic approaches to pragmatics’, Annual Review of Linguistics, 4: 173–191. (Scholar)
  • Yoon, E., M. Tessler, N. Goodman and M. Frank, 2020, ‘Polite Speech Emerges From Competing Social Goals’, Open Mind, 4: 71–87. (Scholar)
  • Vogel, A., M.C. Frank, D. Jurafsky, and C. Potts, 2014, ‘Learning to Reason Pragmatically with Cognitive Limitations’, Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Paul Bello, Marcello Guarini, Marjorie McShane, and Brian Scassellati (eds.), Cognitive Science Society and Curran Associates, Inc., 3055–3060. (Scholar)

Generated Sun May 15 12:10:46 2022