Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Implicature" by Wayne Davis

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

  • Abbott, B. (2000). Presuppositions as non-assertions. Journal of Pragmatics, 32: 1419–37. (Scholar)
  • Anttila, R. (1989). Historical and Comparative Linguistics, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. (Scholar)
  • Atlas, J. D. (1979). How linguistics matters to philosophy: Presupposition, truth, and meaning, in C.-K. Oh, & D. A. Dinneen (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 11: Presupposition, pp. 265–81. New York: Academic Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1989). Philosophy Without Ambiguity, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Atlas, J.D., and Levinson, S. C. (1981). It-clefts, informativeness, and logical form: Radical pragmatics (revised standard version), in P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, pp. 1–61. New York: Academic Press. (Scholar)
  • Bach, K. (1987). Thought and Reference, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1994). Conversational impliciture, Mind and Language, 9: 124–62. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1995). Standardization vs. conventionalization, Linguistics and Philosophy, 18: 677–86. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1999). The myth of conventional implicature, Linguistics and Philosophy, 22: 327–66. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2006). The top 10 misconceptions about implicature, in B. Birner & G. Ward (eds.), Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn, pp. 21–30, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Scholar)
  • Bach, K., and Harnish, R. (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Bates, E. (1976) Language and Context: The Acquisition of Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press. (Scholar)
  • Bezuidenhout, A. (2010). Grice on presupposition, in K. Petrus, ed., Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice, pp. 75–102. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
  • Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic Constraints on Relevance, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1992). Understanding Utterances, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
  • Block, E. (2008). Is the symmetry problem really a problem? Paper presented at the Fall 2008 Workshop in Philosophy and Linguistics, University of Michigan (Scholar)
  • Blutner, R. (2000). Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation, Journal of Semantics, 17: 189–216. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2004). Pragmatics and the lexicon. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 488–514, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. (Scholar)
  • Boër, S., and Lycan, W. (1973). Invited inferences and other unwelcome guests, Papers in Linguistics, 6: 483–506. (Scholar)
  • Borg, E. (2010). On three theories of implicature: Default theory, relevance theory, and minimalism, in K. Petrus, ed., Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice, pp. 268–87. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
  • Bott, L., and Noveck, I. A. (2004). Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 51: 437–57. (Scholar)
  • Brown, J. (2006). Contextualism and warranted assertability manoeuvres, Philosophical Studies, 130: 407–35. (Scholar)
  • Brown, P., and Levinson, S. C. (1978). Universals in language use: Politeness phenomena, in E. Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness, pp. 56–311, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Burton-Roberts, N. (1989). On Horn's dilemma: Presupposition and negation, Journal of Linguistics, 25: 95–125. (Scholar)
  • Camp, E. (2006) Metaphor and that certain ‘je ne sais quoi’, Mind and Language, 129: 1–25. (Scholar)
  • Carston, R. (1987). Being explicit, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10: 713–4. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1988). Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics, in R. Kempson (ed.), Mental Representations: The Interface Between Language and Reality, pp. 155–81, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in S. Davis (ed.), Pragmatics: A Reader, pp. 33–51, Oxford: Oxford University Press (1991). (Scholar)
  • ––– (1996). Metalinguistic negation and echoic use, Journal of Pragmatics, 25: 309–30. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2002). Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2004a). Truth-conditional content and conversational implicature, in C. Bianchi (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction, pp. 1–36, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2004b). Relevance theory and the saying/implicating distinction, in L. R. Horn & G. Ward (ed.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 633–56. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. (Scholar)
  • Chierchia, G. (2004). Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomenona and the syntaxpragmatics interface, in Belletti, A. (ed.), Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, 3, pp. 39–103. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Cohen, L. J. (1971). The logical particles of natural language, in J. Bar-Hillel (ed.), Pragmatics of Natural Language, pp. 50–68. Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
  • Cohen, S. (1986). Knowledge and context, Journal of Philosophy, 83: 574–83. (Scholar)
  • Cole, P. (1975). The synchronic and diachronic status of conversational implicaturem, in P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, pp. 257–88, New York: Academic Press. (Scholar)
  • Cowie, A. P. (1994). Phraseology, in R. Asher (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, pp. 3168–71, Oxford: Pergamon Press. (Scholar)
  • Cowie, A. P., Mackin, R., and McCaig, I. (1983). Oxford Dictionary of Current Idiomatic English, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Davis, W. A. (1998). Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2003). Meaning, Expression, and Thought, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2005). Nondescriptive Meaning and Reference, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2007a). How normative is implicature?, Journal of Pragmatics, 39: 1655–72. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2007b). Knowledge claims and context: Loose use, Philosophical Studies, 132: 395–438. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2010). Irregular negations: Implicature and idiom theories, in K. Petrus, ed., Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice, pp. 103–37. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2013). Grice's razor and invariantism, Journal of Philosophical Research, 38: 147–76. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2014). Knowledge claims and context: Belief, Philosophical Studies, 10.1007/s11098-014-0309-9. (Scholar)
  • Dekker, P., and van Rooy, R. (2000). Bi-directional optimality theory: An application of game theory, Journal of Semantics, 17: 217–42. (Scholar)
  • DeRose, K. (2009). The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context, Vol. 1, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • Frege, G. (1892). On sense and reference, in P. Geach & M. Black (eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, pp. 56–78. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1952. From Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100, 25–50. (Scholar)
  • Gardner, H., Winner, E., Bechhofer, R., and Wolf, D. (1978). The development of figurative language, in K. Nelson (ed.), Children's Language, pp. 1–38. New York: Gardner Press. (Scholar)
  • Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form, New York: Academic Press. (Scholar)
  • Geurts, B. (1998). The mechanisms of denial. Language, 74: 274–307. (Scholar)
  • Green, G. M. (1975). How to get people to do things with words, in P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, pp. 107–41, New York: Academic Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1989). Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding, Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum Associates. (Scholar)
  • Green, M. S. (1995). Quality, volubility, and some varieties of discourse, Linguistics and Philosophy, 18: 83–112. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2002). Review of Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory, by Wayne A. Davis, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65: 241–4. (Scholar)
  • Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning, Philosophical Review, 66: 377–88. Reprinted in H. P. Grice (ed.), Studies in the Ways of Words, pp. 213–23. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1989). (Scholar)
  • ––– (1961). The causal theory of perception, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 35: 121–52. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1969). Utterer's meaning and intentions, Philosophical Review, 78: 147–77. Reprinted in H. P. Grice (ed.), Studies in the Way of Words, pp. 86–116. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press (1989). (Scholar)
  • ––– (1975). Logic and conversation, in P. Cole & J. Morgan (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, pp. 41–58, New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in H. P. Grice (ed.), Studies in the Way of Words, pp. 22–40, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1989). (Scholar)
  • ––– (1978). Further notes on logic and conversation, in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, 9: Pragmatics, pp. 113–28, New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in H. P. Grice (ed.), Studies in the Way of Words, pp. 41–57, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1989). (Scholar)
  • ––– (1981). Presupposition and conversational implicature, in Radical Pragmatics, P. Cole (ed.), pp. 183–98, New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in H. P. Grice (ed.), Studies in the Ways of Words, pp. 269–282. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1989). (Scholar)
  • Harnish, R. (1976). Logical form and implicature, in T. G. Bever, J. J. Katz & T. Langedoen (eds.), An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability, pp. 313–92, New York: Thomas Y. Crowell. Reprinted in S. Davis (ed.), Pragmatics: A Reader, pp. 316–364, Oxford: Oxford University Press (1991). (Scholar)
  • Hazlett, A. (2007). Grice's razor, Metaphilosophy, 38: 669–90. (Scholar)
  • Hirschberg, J. (1991). A Theory of Scalar Implicature, New York: Garland. (Scholar)
  • Hobbs, J. R., Stickel, M., Appelt, D., and Martin, P. (1993). Interpretation as abduction, Artificial Intelligence, 63: 69–142. (Scholar)
  • Hopper, P.J., and Traugott, E. C. (1993). Grammaticization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Horn, L. R. (1972). On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English, Ph.D. Thesis, UCLA. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1984). Towards a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature, in D. Schiffrin (ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, pp. 11–42. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1985). Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language, 61: 121–74. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1989). A Natural History of Negation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1992). Pragmatics, implicature, and presupposition, in W. Bright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Vol. 2, pp. 260–6. New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2003). Pragmatics: Implicature, in W. J. Frawley (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, 2nd Ed., pp. 381–4. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2004). Implicature, in L. R. Horn & G. Ward (ed.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 3–28. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2008). “I love me some him”: The landscape of non-argumentative datives, in O. Bonami and P. C. Hofherr, Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, 7: 169–92. [Preprint vailable onlin].
  • ––– (2010). WJ-40: Issues in the investigation of implicature, in K. Petrus, ed., Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice, pp. 310–19. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
  • Huang, Y. (2006). Neo-Gricean pragmatics, in K. Brown (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd. Ed., pp. 231–8. New York: Elsevier. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2007). Pragmatics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Hungerland, I. C. (1960). Contextual implication. Inquiry, 3, 211–58. (Scholar)
  • Jary, M. (1998). Relevance theory and the communication of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 30: 1–19. (Scholar)
  • Karttunen, L., and Peters, S. (1979). Conversational implicature, in C.-K. Oh & D. A. Dinneen (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, 11: Presupposition, pp. 1–56. New York: Academic Press. (Scholar)
  • Kasher, A. (1976). Conversational maxims and rationality, in A. Kasher (ed.), Language in Focus, pp. 197–216. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
  • Kasper, G. (2003). Pragmatics: Applied pragmatics, in W. J. Frawley (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, 2nd Ed., pp. 390–2. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Kempson, R. (1975). Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1986). Ambiguity and the semantics-pragmatics distinction, in C. Travis (ed.), Meaning and Interpretation, pp. 77–103. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
  • Kennison, S. M. (2014) Introduction to Language Development, Los Angeles: Sage. (Scholar)
  • Krifka, M. (2002). Be brief and vague! And how bidirectional optimality theory allows for verbosity and precision, in D. Restle & D. Zaefferer (ed.), Sounds and Systems: Studies in Structure and Change. A Festschrift for Theo Vennemann, pp. 439–58. Berlin: De Gruyter. (Scholar)
  • Kripke, S. (1977). Speaker reference and semantic reference, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 2: 255–78. (Scholar)
  • Kroch, A. (1972). Lexical and inferred meanings for some time adverbs. Quarterly Progress Report of the Research Lab of Electronics, MIT. (Scholar)
  • Lakoff, R. (1977). What you can do with words: Politeness, pragmatics and performatives, in R. Rogers, R. Wall & J. Murphy (eds.), Proceedings of the Texas Conference on Performatives, Presuppositions and Implicatures, pp. 79–106. Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics. (Scholar)
  • Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics, London: Longmans. (Scholar)
  • Lepore, E., and Stone, M. (2010). Against metaphorical meaning, Topoi, 29: 165–80. (Scholar)
  • ––– (Forthcoming). Imagination and Convention: Distinguishing Grammar and Inference in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1989). Review of relevance. Journal of Linguistics, 25: 455–72. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Lewis, D. (1969). Convention, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1975). Languages and language, in K. Gunderson (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Language, vol. 7, pp. 3–35. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1996). Elusive knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74: 549–67. (Scholar)
  • Lycan, W. (1984). Logical Form and Natural Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Martinich, A. P. (1984). Communication and Reference, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter. (Scholar)
  • Matsumoto, Y. (1995). The conversational condition on Horn scales. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18: 21–60. (Scholar)
  • McCawley, J. D. (1978). Conversational implicature and the lexicon, in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, 9: Pragmatics, pp. 245–58. New York: Academic Press. (Scholar)
  • Meibauer, J. (2006). Implicature, in K. Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd Ed., pp. 568–81. New York: Elsevier. (Scholar)
  • Mill, J. S. (1867). An Examination of the Philosophy of Sir William Hamilton, 3rd Ed. London: Longmans. (Scholar)
  • Morgan, J. L. (1978). Two types of convention in indirect speech acts, in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, 9: Pragmatics, pp. 261–80. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in S. Davis (ed.), Pragmatics: A Reader, pp. 242–253. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1991). (Scholar)
  • Neale, S. (1992). Paul Grice and the philosophy of language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15: 509–59. (Scholar)
  • Nunberg, G. (1981). Validating pragmatic explanations, in P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, pp. 199–222. New York: Academic Press. (Scholar)
  • Pearson, B. Z. (1990). The comprehension of metaphor by preschool children, Journal of Child Language, 17: 185–203. (Scholar)
  • Petrus, K. (2010). Introduction: Paul Grice, philosopher of language, but more than that, in K. Petrus, ed., Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice, pp. 1–30. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
  • Pinker, S. (2007). The evolutionary social psychology of off-record indirect speech acts, Intercultural Pragmatics, 4: 437–61. (Scholar)
  • Potts, C. (2005). The Logic of Conversational Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Potts, C. (2007). Into the conventional-implicature dimension, Philosophy Compass, 2: 655–79. (Scholar)
  • Pouscoulous, N., Noveck, I. A., Plitzer, G., and Bastide, A. (2007). A developmental investigation of processing costs in implicature production, Language Acquisition, 14: 347–75. (Scholar)
  • Recanati, F. (1987). Literalness and other pragmatic principles. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10: 729–30. (Scholar)
  • Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14: 479–493. (Scholar)
  • Rysiew, P. (2000). Review of Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory, by Wayne A. Davis, Mind, 109: 435. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2001). The context-sensitivity of knowledge attributions, Noûs, 35: 477–514. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2005). Contesting contextualism, Grazier-Philosophische Studien, 69: 51–69. (Scholar)
  • Sadock, J. M. (1974). Toward a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1978). On testing for conversational implicature, in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, 9: Pragmatics, pp. 281–97. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in S. Davis (ed.), Pragmatics: A Reader, pp. 365–376. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (1991). (Scholar)
  • ––– (1981). Almost, in P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, pp. 257–72. (Scholar)
  • Salmon, N. (1986). Frege's Puzzle, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Sauerland, U. (2004). Scalar implicatures in complex sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27: 367–91. (Scholar)
  • Sauerland, U. and Stateva, P., eds. (2007). Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics, Houndmillls: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
  • Saul, J. (2001). Review of Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory by Wayne Davis. Noûs, 35: 630–41. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2002). Speaker meaning, what is said, and what is implicated. Noûs, 36: 228–48. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2010). Speaker-meaning, conversational implicature and calculability, in K. Petrus, ed., Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice, pp. 170–83. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2012). Lying, Misleading, and What is Said: An Exploration in Philosophy of Language and in Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Searle, J. (1975), indirect speech acts, in P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, pp. 59–82. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in S. Davis (ed.), Pragmatics: A Reader, pp. 265–277. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (1991).
  • Simons, M. (2010). A Gricean view on intrusive implicatures, in K. Petrus, ed., Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice, pp. 138–69. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
  • Soames, S. (1989). Direct reference and propositional attitudes, in J. Almog, J. Perry & H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, pp. 393–419. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Sperber, D., and Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction, in P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, pp. 295–318. New York: Academic Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1986a). Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1986b). Loose talk. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 86: 153–71. Reprinted in S. Davis (ed.), Pragmatics: A Reader, pp. 540–549. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (1991). (Scholar)
  • ––– (1987). Précis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 679–754. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd edition, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
  • Stalnaker, R. (1974). Pragmatic presuppositions, in M. K. Munitz & P. K. Unger (ed.), Semantics and Philosophy, pp. 471–81. New York: New York University Press. (Scholar)
  • Strawson, P. F. (1950). On referring. Mind, 59: 320–44. (Scholar)
  • Thomason, R. (1990). Accommodation, meaning, and implicature: Interdisciplinary foundations for pragmatics, in P. R. Cohen, J. L. Morgan & M. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communication, pp. 325–63. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Van der Sandt, R. A. (1991). Denial, Papers from the Chicago Linguistics Society: The parasession on negation, 27: 331–44. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2003). Denial and presupposition, in P. Künlein, H. Reiser, and H. Zeevat (eds.), Perspectives on Dialogue in the New Millenium, pp. 55–. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Scholar)
  • Van Kuppevelt, J. (1996), inferring from topics: Scalar implicatures as topic dependent inferences. Linguistics and Philosophy, 19: 393–443. (Scholar)
  • Van Rooy, R. (2004). Signalling games select Horn strategies. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27: 493–527. (Scholar)
  • Van Rooy, R. and de Jager, T. (2012). Explaining quantity implicatures, Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 21: 461–77. (Scholar)
  • Wierzbicka, A. (1985). Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 9: 145–78. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1987). Boys will be boys: “radical semantics” vs. “radical pragmatics.” Language, 63: 95–114. (Scholar)
  • ––– (2003). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. (Scholar)
  • Wilson, D., and Sperber, D. (1981). On Grice's theory of conversation, in P. Werth (ed.), Conversation and Discourse, pp. 155–78. New York: St. Martins Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (1986), inference and implicature, in C. Travis (ed.), Meaning and Interpretation, pp. 45–76. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Reprinted in Pragmatics: A Reader, S. Davis (ed.), pp. 377–393. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (1991).
  • ––– (2004). Relevance theory, in L. R. Horn & G. Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 607–32, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. (Scholar)
  • Winner, E. (1988). The Point of Words: Children's Understanding of Metaphor and Irony. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Yus, F. (2006). Relevance theory, in K. Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd Ed., pp. 512–9. New York: Elsevier. (Scholar)
  • Zeevat, H. (2000). The asymmetry of optimality theoretic syntax and semantics. Journal of Semantics, 17: 243–62. (Scholar)
  • Ziff, P. (1960). Semantic Analysis, Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)

Generated Tue Jul 25 12:14:41 2017