Linked bibliography for the SEP article "The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories" by Eric Oberheim and Paul Hoyningen-Huene

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Barker, P., Chen, X. and Andersen, H., 2003, “Kuhn on Concepts and Categorization”, in T. Nickels (ed.), Thomas Kuhn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 212–245. (Scholar)
Bird, A., 2007, “Incommensurability Naturalized”, in L. Soler, H. Sankey and P. Hoyningen-Huene (eds.), Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison, Berlin: Springer, pp. 21–39. (Scholar)
–––, 2012, “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and its Significance: An Essay Review of the Fiftieth Anniversary Edition”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63(4): 859–883. (Scholar)
Bschir, K., 2015, “Feyerabend and Popper on Theory Proliferation and Anomaly Import: On the Compatibility of Theoretical Pluralism and Critical Rationalism”, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 5(1): 24–55. (Scholar)
Caamaño, M., 2011, “A Structural Analysis of the Phlogiston Case”, Erkenntnis, 70(3): 331–364. (Scholar)
Carrier, M., 2001, “Changing Laws and Shifting Concepts: On the Nature and Impact of Incommensurability”, in P. Hoyningen-Huene and H. Sankey (ed.), Incommensurability and Related Matters, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 65–90. (Scholar)
–––, 2008, “The Aim and Structure of Methodological Theory”, in L. Soler, H. Sankey and P. Hoyningen-Huene (ed.), Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison: Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilites?, Berlin: Springer, pp. 273–290. (Scholar)
Chen, X., 1997, “Thomas Kuhn’s Latest Notion of Incommensurability”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 28: 257–273. (Scholar)
Clagett, M., 1959, The Science of Mechanics in the Middle Ages. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. (Scholar)
Collodel, M., 2016, “Was Feyerabend a Popperian? Methodological issues in the History of the Philosophy of Science”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 57: 27–56. (Scholar)
Conant, J. and Haugeland, J., 2000, “Editors’ Introduction”, in J. Conant and J. Haugeland (ed.), The Road Since Structure, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–9. (Scholar)
Demir, I., 2008, “Incommensurabilities in the Work of Thomas Kuhn”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 39: 133–142. (Scholar)
Devitt, M., 2001, “Incommensurability and the Priority of Metaphysics”, in P. Hoyningen-Huene and H. Sankey (ed.), Incommensurability and Related Matters, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 143–157. (Scholar)
Duhem, P., 1906 [1954], The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Einstein, A., 1949a, “Autobiographical Notes”, in P. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, La Salle: Open Court, pp. 3–95. (Scholar)
–––, 1949b, “Remarks Concerning the Essays Brought Together in this Co-operative Volume”, in in P. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, La Salle: Open Court, pp. 665–668. (Scholar)
Farrell, R., 2003, Feyerabend and Scientific Values. Tightrope-Walking Rationality, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
Feyerabend, P., 1951, Zur Theorie der Basissätze, Ph.D. thesis, University of Vienna, Universitäts Bibliothek Wien. (Scholar)
–––, 1954, “Physik und Ontologie”, Wissenschaft und Weltbild: Monatsschrift für alle Gebiete der Forschung, 7: 464–476. (Scholar)
–––, 1958a, “An Attempt at a Realistic Interpretation of Experience”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 58: 143–170. (Scholar)
–––, 1958b, “Complementarity”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 32 (Supplement): 75–104. (Scholar)
–––, 1961, “Niels Bohr’s Interpretation of the Quantum Theory”, in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (ed.), Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science, New York: Rinehart and Winston, pp. 35–39. (Scholar)
–––, 1962, “Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism”, in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (ed.), Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time, (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume III), Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, pp. 28–97. (Scholar)
–––, 1963, “How to Be a Good Empiricist: A Plea for Tolerance in Matters Epistemological”, in B. Baumrin (ed.), Philosophy of Science: The Delaware Seminar, New York: Interscience Press (John Wiley). (Scholar)
–––, 1965a, “On the ‘Meaning’ of Scientific Terms”, Journal of Philosophy, 62: 266–274. (Scholar)
–––, 1965b, “Problems of Empiricism”, in R. Colodny (ed.), Beyond the Edge of Certainty. Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy, Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh Center for Philosophy of Science, pp. 145–260. (Scholar)
–––, 1965c, “Reply to Criticism. Comments on Smart, Sellars and Putnam”, in R. Cohen and M. Wartofsky (ed.), Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1962–64: In Honor of Philipp Frank (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume II), New York: Humanities Press, pp. 223–261. (Scholar)
–––, 1967, “The Mind-Body Problem”, Continuum, 5: 35–49. (Scholar)
–––, 1969, “Linguistic Arguments and Scientific Method”, Telos, 2: 43–63. (Scholar)
–––, 1970a, “Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge”, in M. Radner and S. Winokur (ed.), Analysis of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology, (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume IV), Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, pp. 17–130. (Scholar)
–––, 1970b, “Consolations for the Specialist”, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (ed.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–230. (Scholar)
–––, 1975, Against Method. Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, London: New Left Books. (Scholar)
–––, 1977, “Changing Patterns of Reconstruction”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 28: 351–382. (Scholar)
–––, 1978, Science in a Free Society, London: New Left Books. (Scholar)
–––, 1981a, Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method. Philosophical papers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1981b, “Consolations for the specialist”, in Problems of Empiricism. Philosophical Papers, Volume 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–167. (Scholar)
–––, 1981c, “More clothes from the emperor’s bargain basement: A review of Laudan’s Progress and its Problems”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 32: 57–71. (Scholar)
–––, 1983, Wider den Methodenzwang, 2nd Edition, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (Scholar)
–––, 1987, “Putnam on Incommensurability”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 38: 75–81. (Scholar)
–––, 1988, Against Method, revised edition, London: Verso. (Scholar)
–––, 1993, Against Method, 3rd edition, London: Verso. (Scholar)
–––, 1995, Killing Time: The Autobiography of Paul Feyerabend, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Fleck, L., 1935 [1979], Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, T. Trenn and R. Merton (ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1927 [1986], “Some Specific Features of The Medical Way of Thinking”, in R. Cohen and T. Schnelle (ed.), Cognition and Fact: Materials on Ludwik Fleck, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 39–46. (Scholar)
–––, 1935 [1986], “Scientific Observation and Perception in General”, in R. Cohen and T. Schnelle (ed.), Cognition and Fact: Materials on Ludwik Fleck, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 59–78. (Scholar)
–––, 1936 [1986], “The Problem of Epistemology”, in R. Cohen and T. Schnelle (ed.), Cognition and Fact: Materials on Ludwik Fleck, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 79–112. (Scholar)
–––, 1947 [1986], “To Look, To See, To Know”, in R. Cohen and T. Schnelle (ed.), Cognition and Fact: Materials on Ludwik Fleck, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 129–151. (Scholar)
Gattei, S. and Agassi, J., 2016, “Introduction”, in S. Gattei and J. Agassi (eds.) Paul K. Feyerabend. Physics and Philosophy. Philosophical Papers Volume 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. x–xxix. (Scholar)
Harwood, J., 1986, “Fleck and the Sociology of Knowledge”, Social Studies of Science, 16: 173–187. (Scholar)
Hoyningen-Huene, P., 1990, “Kuhn’s Conception of Incommensurability”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 21: 481–492. (Scholar)
–––, 1992, “The Interrelations Between the Philosophy, History, and Sociology of Science in Thomas Kuhn’s Theory of Scientific Development”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 42: 487–501. (Scholar)
–––, 1993, Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions. The Philosophy of Science of Thomas S. Kuhn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2004, “Three Biographies: Kuhn, Feyerabend and Incommensurability”, in R. Harris (ed.) Rhetoric and Incommensurability, West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press, pp. 150–175. (Scholar)
–––, 2008, “Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution”, Foundations of Chemistry, 10: 101–115. (Scholar)
–––, 2021, “The Genealogy of Kuhn’s Metaphysics”, in K. B. Wray (ed.), Interpreting Kuhn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–26 (Scholar)
–––, 2022, “Is Kuhn’s ‘world change through revolutions’ comprehensible?”, Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 59(4): 55–72 (Scholar)
–––, 2023, “The Plausibility of Kuhn’s Metaphysics”, in P. Melogno, H. Miguel, and L. Giri (eds.), Perspectives on Kuhn: Contemporary Approaches to the Philosophy of Thomas Kuhn, Springer, pp. 139–154. (Scholar)
Horwich, P. (ed.) 1993, World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Köhler, W., 1938 [1920], “Physical Gestalten”, in W. Ellis (ed.), A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, and Co., pp. 17–54. (Scholar)
Kuhn, T., 1957, The Copernican Revolution, John Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Page references are to the second enlarged edition with new “Postscript—1969” published 1970, and unchanged in the third edition published 1996.] (Scholar)
–––, 1970, “Postscript—1969”, in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 174–210. (Scholar)
–––, 1977, The Essential Tension, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2000 [1970], “Reflections on My Critics”, in J. Conant and J. Haugeland (ed.), The Road Since Structure, Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 123–175. (Scholar)
–––, 2000 [1981], “What Are Scientific Revolutions?”, in Kuhn 2000, 13–32. (Scholar)
–––, 2000 [1983], “Rationality and Theory Choice”, in in Kuhn 2000, 208–215.
–––, 2000 [1989], “Possible Worlds in History of Science”, in Kuhn 2000, 58–89.
–––, 2000 [1991], “The Road since Structure”, in Kuhn 2000, 90–104.
–––, 2000 [1993], “Afterwords”, in Kuhn 2000, 224–252.
–––, 2000 [1995], “A Discussion with Thomas S. Kuhn”, in Kuhn 2000, 255–323. (Scholar)
–––, 2000, The Road Since Structure, J. Conant and J. Haugeland (eds.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Lipton, P., 2001, “Kant on Wheels”, London Review of Books, 23: 30–31. (Scholar)
Melogno, P., 2023, “Kuhn’s ‘The Natures of Conceptual Change’: the search for a theory of meaning and the birth of taxonomies (1980–1994)”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 36: 87–103. (Scholar)
Mladenovic, B., 2022, The Last Writings of Thomas S. Kuhn: Incommensurability in Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Moreno, L. F. 2009, “Incommensurability: Between Reference Change and Untranslatability”, in G. Recio and J. Luis (ed.), Philosophical Essays on Physics and Biology, Hildesheim: G. Olms. (Scholar)
Oberheim, E., 2006, Feyerabend’s Philosophy, Berlin: De Gruyter. (Scholar)
–––, 2016, “Rediscovering Einstein’s legacy. How Einstein anticipates Kuhn and Feyerabend on the nature of science”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 57: 17–26. (Scholar)
–––, 2024, “The Limited Validity of Falsificationism. Feyerabend’s theoretical pluralism and its relation to Popper, Wittgenstein, and Bohm”, Philosophical Aspects of Origin https://fag.ifil.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/fag (Scholar)
Oberheim, E. and Hoyningen-Huene, P., 1997, “Incommensurability, Realism and Meta-Incommensurability”, Theoria, 12: 447–465. (Scholar)
Peine, A., 2011, “Challenging Incommensurability: What We Can Learn From Ludwik Fleck for the Analysis of Configurational Innovation”, Minerva, 49(4): 489–508. (Scholar)
Pinto de Oliveira, J.C., 2017, “Thomas Kuhn, the Image of Science and the Image of Art: The First Manuscript of Structure”, Perspectives on Science, 25: 746–765. (Scholar)
Preston, J., Munévar, G. and Lamb, D. (ed.), 2000, The Worst Enemy of Science? Essays in Memory of Paul Feyerabend, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Psillos, S., 2008, “Carnap and Incommensurability”, Philosophical Inquiry, 30: 135–156. (Scholar)
Sankey, H., 1993, “Kuhn’s Changing Concept of Incommensurability”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44: 759–774. (Scholar)
–––, 1994, The Incommensurability Thesis, London: Ashgate. (Scholar)
–––, 1997, “Taxonomic Incommensurability”, in H. Sankey (ed.), Rationality, Relativism and Incommensurability, London: Ashgate, pp. 66–80. (Scholar)
–––, 2009, “Scientific Realism and the Semantic Incommensurability Thesis”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 40(2): 196–202. (Scholar)
Sankey, H. and Hoyningen-Huene, P., 2001, “Introduction”, in P. Hoyningen-Huene and H. Sankey (ed.), Incommensurability and Related Matters, Dordrecht: Kluwer: vii–xxxiv. (Scholar)
Schilpp, P. (ed.), 1949, Albert Einstein: Philosopher –Scientist. La Salle: Open Court. (Scholar)
Soler, L., Sankey, H. and Hoyningen-Huene, P. (eds.), 2008, Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison, Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
Stillwaggon Swan, L. and Bruce, M., 2011, “Kuhn’s Incommensurability Arguments”, in M. Bruce and S. Barbone (ed.), Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy, Wiley–Blackwell. (Scholar)
Tambolo, L., 2015, “A tale of three theories: Feyerabend and Popper on progress and the aim of science”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 51: 33–41. (Scholar)
Theocharis, T., and Psimopoulos, M., 1987, “Where science has gone wrong”, Nature, 329: 595–598. (Scholar)
Wolf, M., 2007, “Reference and Incommensurability: What Rigid Designation Won’t Get You”, Acta Analytica, 22(3): 207–222. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Dec 8 23:54:35 2024

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...