Linked bibliography for the SEP article "The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories" by Eric Oberheim and Paul Hoyningen-Huene
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Barker, P., Chen, X. and Andersen, H., 2003, “Kuhn on Concepts and Categorization”, in T. Nickels (ed.), Thomas Kuhn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 212–245. (Scholar)
- Bird, A., 2007, “Incommensurability Naturalized”, in L. Soler, H. Sankey and P. Hoyningen-Huene (eds.), Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison, Berlin: Springer, pp. 21–39. (Scholar)
- Bschir, K., 2015, “Feyerabend and Popper on Theory Proliferation and Anomaly Import: On the Compatibility of Theoretical Pluralism and Critical Rationalism”, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 5(1): 24–55. (Scholar)
- Caamaño, M., 2011, “A Structural Analysis of the Phlogiston Case”, Erkenntnis, 70(3): 331–364. (Scholar)
- Carrier, M., 2001, “Changing Laws and Shifting Concepts: On the Nature and Impact of Incommensurability”, in P. Hoyningen-Huene and H. Sankey (ed.), Incommensurability and Related Matters, Dordrecth: Kluwer, pp. 65–90. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, “The Aim and Structure of
Methodological Theory”, in L. Soler, H. Sankey and P.
Hoyningen-Huene (ed.), Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory
Comparison: Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilites?, Berlin:
Springer, pp. 273–290. (Scholar)
- Chen, X., 1997, “Thomas Kuhn’s Latest Notion of
Incommensurability”, Journal for General Philosophy of
Science, 28: 257–273. (Scholar)
- Collodel, M., 2016, “Was Feyerabend a Popperian? Methodological issues in the History of the Philosophy of Science”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 57: 27–56. (Scholar)
- Conant, J. and Haugeland, J., 2000, “Editors’
Introduction”, in J. Conant and J. Haugeland (ed.), The Road
Since Structure, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.
1–9. (Scholar)
- Demir, I., 2008, “Incommensurabilities in the Work of Thomas Kuhn”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 39: 133–142. (Scholar)
- Devitt, M., 2001, “Incommensurability and the Priority of Metaphysics”, in P. Hoyningen-Huene and H. Sankey (ed.), Incommensurability and Related Matters, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 143–157. (Scholar)
- Duhem, P., 1906 [1954], The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Einstein, A., 1949a, “Autobiographical Notes”, in P. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, La Salle: Open Court, pp. 3–95. (Scholar)
- –––, 1949b, “Remarks Concerning the Essays
Brought Together in this Co-operative Volume”, in in P. Schilpp
(ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, La Salle: Open
Court, pp. 665–668. (Scholar)
- Farrell, R., 2003, Feyerabend and Scientific Values. Tightrope-Walking Rationality, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Feyerabend, P., 1951, Zur Theorie der Basissätze,
Ph.D. thesis, University of Vienna, Universitäts Bibliothek
Wien. (Scholar)
- –––, 1954, “Physik und Ontologie“,
Wissenschaft und Weltbild: Monatsschrift für alle Gebiete der
Forschung, 7: 464–476. (Scholar)
- –––, 1958a, “An Attempt at a Realistic
Interpretation of Experience”, Proceedings of the
Aristotelian Society, 58: 143–170. (Scholar)
- –––, 1958b, “Complementarity”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 32 (Supplement): 75–104. (Scholar)
- –––, 1961, “Niels Bohr’s
Interpretation of the Quantum Theory”, in H. Feigl and G.
Maxwell (ed.), Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science,
New York: Rinehart and Winston, pp. 35–39. (Scholar)
- –––, 1962, “Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism”, in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (ed.), Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time, (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume III), Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, pp. 28–97. (Scholar)
- –––, 1963a, “How to Be a Good Empiricist:
A Plea for Tolerance in Matters Epistemological”, in B. Baumrin
(ed.), Philosophy of Science: The Delaware Seminar, New York:
Interscience Press (John Wiley). (Scholar)
- –––, 1963b, “Materialism and the Mind-Body Problem”, The Review of Metaphysics, 17: 49–66. (Scholar)
- –––, 1965a, “On the ‘Meaning’
of Scientific Terms”, Journal of Philosophy, 62:
266–274. (Scholar)
- –––, 1965b, “Problems of Empiricism”, in R. Colodny (ed.), Beyond the Edge of Certainty. Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy, Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh Center for Philosophy of Science, pp. 145–260. (Scholar)
- –––, 1965c, “Reply to Criticism. Comments
on Smart, Sellars and Putnam”, in R. Cohen and M. Wartofsky
(ed.), Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of
Science 1962–64: In Honor of Philipp Frank (Boston Studies
in the Philosophy of Science, Volume II), New York: Humanities Press,
pp. 223–261. (Scholar)
- –––, 1967, “The Mind-Body Problem”,
Continuum, 5: 35–49. (Scholar)
- –––, 1969a, “Materialism and the Mind-Body Problem” in J. O’Connor (ed.), Modern Materialism: Readings on Mind-Body Identity, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc., pp. 82–98. (Scholar)
- –––, 1969b, “Linguistic Arguments and Scientific Method”, Telos, 2: 43–63. (Scholar)
- –––, 1970a, “Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge”, in M. Radner and S. Winokur (ed.), Analysis of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology, (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume IV), Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, pp. 17–130. (Scholar)
- –––, 1970b, “Consolations for the Specialist”, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (ed.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–230. (Scholar)
- –––, 1975, Against Method. Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, London: New Left Books. (Scholar)
- –––, 1977, “Changing Patterns of Reconstruction”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 28: 351–382. (Scholar)
- –––, 1978, Science in a Free Society, London: New Left Books. (Scholar)
- –––, 1981a, Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method. Philosophical papers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1981b, “Consolations for the specialist”, in Problems of Empiricism. Philosophical Papers, Volume 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–167. (Scholar)
- –––, 1981c, “More clothes from the
emperor’s bargain basement: A review of Laudan’s
Progress and its Problems”, British Journal for the
Philosophy of Science, 32: 57–71. (Scholar)
- –––, 1983, Wider den Methodenzwang, 2nd Edition, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (Scholar)
- –––, 1987, “Putnam on Incommensurability”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 38: 75–81. (Scholar)
- –––, 1988, Against Method, revised edition, London: Verso. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, Against Method, 3rd edition, London: Verso. (Scholar)
- –––, 1994. “Potentially Every Culture is All Cultures” Common Knowledge, 3: 16–22. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995, Killing Time: The Autobiography of Paul Feyerabend, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Fleck, L., 1935 [1979], Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, T. Trenn and R. Merton (ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1927 [1986], “Some Specific Features
of The Medical Way of Thinking”, in R. Cohen and T. Schnelle
(ed.), Cognition and Fact: Materials on Ludwik Fleck,
Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 39–46. (Scholar)
- –––, 1935 [1986], “Scientific Observation
and Perception in General”, in R. Cohen and T. Schnelle (ed.),
Cognition and Fact: Materials on Ludwik Fleck, Dordrecht: D.
Reidel, pp. 59–78. (Scholar)
- –––, 1936 [1986], “The Problem of
Epistemology”, in R. Cohen and T. Schnelle (ed.), Cognition
and Fact: Materials on Ludwik Fleck, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp.
79–112. (Scholar)
- –––, 1947 [1986], “To Look, To See, To
Know”, in R. Cohen and T. Schnelle (ed.), Cognition and
Fact: Materials on Ludwik Fleck, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp.
129–151. (Scholar)
- Harwood, J., 1986, “Fleck and the Sociology of
Knowledge”, Social Studies of Science, 16:
173–187. (Scholar)
- Hoyningen-Huene, P., 1990, “Kuhn’s Conception of
Incommensurability”, Studies in History and Philosophy of
Science, 21: 481–492. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992, “The Interrelations Between the
Philosophy, History, and Sociology of Science in Thomas Kuhn’s
Theory of Scientific Development”, British Journal for the
Philosophy of Science, 42: 487–501. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, Reconstructing Scientific
Revolutions. The Philosophy of Science of Thomas S. Kuhn,
Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, “Three Biographies: Kuhn,
Feyerabend and Incommensurability”, in R. Harris (ed.)
Rhetoric and Incommensurability, West Lafayette, IN: Parlor
Press, pp. 150–175. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, “Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution”, Foundations of Chemistry, 10: 101–115. (Scholar)
- Horwich, P. (ed.) 1993, World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Köhler, W., 1938 [1920], “Physical Gestalten“, in
W. Ellis (ed.), A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology, London:
Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, and Co., pp. 17–54. (Scholar)
- Kuhn, T., 1957, The Copernican Revolution, John Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Page references are to the second enlarged edition with new “Postscript—1969” published 1970, and unchanged in the third edition published 1996.] (Scholar)
- –––, 1970, “Postscript—1969”,
in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press: 174–210. (Scholar)
- –––, 1977, The Essential Tension, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000 [1970], “Reflections on My
Critics”, in J. Conant and J. Haugeland (ed.), The Road
Since Structure, Chicago: University of Chicago Press:
123–175. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000 [1981], “What Are Scientific
Revolutions?”, in Kuhn 2000, 13–32. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000 [1983], “Rationality and Theory
Choice”, in in Kuhn 2000, 208–215.
- –––, 2000 [1989], “Possible Worlds in
History of Science”, in Kuhn 2000, 58–89.
- –––, 2000 [1991], “The Road since
Structure”, in Kuhn 2000, 90–104.
- –––, 2000 [1993], “Afterwords”, in
Kuhn 2000, 224–252.
- –––, 2000 [1995], “A Discussion with
Thomas S. Kuhn”, in Kuhn 2000, 255–323. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, The Road Since Structure, J. Conant and J. Haugeland (eds.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Lipton, P., 2001, “Kant on Wheels”, London Review of Books, 23: 30–31. (Scholar)
- Moreno, L. F. 2009, “Incommensurability: Between Reference Change and Untranslatability“, in G. Recio and J. Luis (ed.), Philosophical Essays on Physics and Biology, Hildesheim: G. Olms. (Scholar)
- Oberheim, E., 2005, “On the Historical Origins of the
Contemporary Notion of Incommensurability: Paul Feyerabend’s
Assault on Conceptual Conservativism”, Studies in the
History and Philosophy of Science, 36: 363–390. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, Feyerabend’s
Philosophy, Berlin: De Gruyter. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, “Rediscovering Einstein’s
legacgy. How Einstein anticpates Kuhn and Feyerabend on the nature of
science”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of
Science, 57: 17–26. (Scholar)
- Oberheim, E. and Hoyningen-Huene, P., 1997, “Incommensurability, Realism and Meta-Incommensurability”, Theoria, 12: 447–465. (Scholar)
- Peine, A., 2011, “Challenging Incommensurability: What We Can Learn From Ludwik Fleck for the Analysis of Configurational Innovation”, Minerva, 49(4): 489–508. (Scholar)
- Pinto de Oliveira, J.C., 2017, “Thomas Kuhn, the Image of Science and the Image of Art: The First Manuscript of Structure”, Perspectives on Science, 25: 746–765. (Scholar)
- Preston, J., Munévar, G. and Lamb, D. (ed.), 2000, The Worst Enemy of Science? Essays in Memory of Paul Feyerabend, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Psillos, S., 2008, “Carnap and Incommensurability”, Philosophical Inquiry, 30: 135–156. (Scholar)
- Sankey, H., 1993, “Kuhn’s Changing Concept of
Incommensurability”, British Journal for the Philosophy of
Science, 44: 759–774. (Scholar)
- –––, 1994, The Incommensurability Thesis, London: Ashgate. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, “Taxonomic Incommensurability”, in H. Sankey (ed.), Rationality, Relativism and Incommensurability, London: Ashgate, pp. 66–80. (Scholar)
- Sankey, H., 2009, “Scientific Realism and the Semantic Incommensurability Thesis”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 40(2): 196–202. (Scholar)
- Sankey, H. and Hoyningen-Huene, P., 2001, “Introduction”, in P. Hoyningen-Huene and H. Sankey (ed.), Incommensurability and Related Matters, Dordrecht: Kluwer: vii-xxxiv. (Scholar)
- Schilpp, P. (ed.), 1949, Albert Einstein: Philosopher –Scientist. La Salle: Open Court. (Scholar)
- Sirtes, D. and Oberheim, E., 2006, “Einstein, Entropy and Anomaly“, in J. Alimi and A. Füzfa (eds.), Albert Einstein Century International Conference (AIP Conference Proceedings, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Volume 861), Berlin: Springer, pp. 1147–1154. (Scholar)
- Soler, L., Sankey, H. and Hoyningen-Huene, P. (eds.), 2008, Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison, Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
- Stillwaggon Swan, L. and Bruce, M., 2011, “Kuhn’s
Incommensurability Arguments”, in M. Bruce and S. Barbone (ed.),
Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western
Philosophy, Wiley–Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Tambolo, L., 2015, “A tale of three theories: Feyerabend and Popper on progress and the aim of science”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 51: 33–41. (Scholar)
- Theocharis, T., and Psimopoulos, M., 1987, “Where science
has gone wrong”, Nature, 329: 595–598. (Scholar)
- Wolf, M., 2007, “Reference and Incommensurability: What
Rigid Designation Won’t Get You”, Acta Analytica,
22(3): 207–222. (Scholar)