Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Indexicals" by David Braun

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Almog, J., Perry, J. and Wettstein, H., 1989. Themes from Kaplan, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Austin, David, 1990. What’s the Meaning of “This”?, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
Bach, Kent, 1992a. “Intentions and Demonstrations,” Analysis, 52: 140–146. (Scholar)
–––, 1992b. “Paving the Road to Reference.” Philosophical Studies, 67: 295–300. (Scholar)
–––, 1994. “Conversational Implicature,” Mind and Language, 9: 124–162. (Scholar)
–––, 2001. “Speaking Loosely: Sentence Nonliterality,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 25: 249–63. (Scholar)
–––, 2005. “Context ex Machina,” in Zoltan Szabo (ed.), Semantics versus Pragmatics, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Borg, Emma, 2000. “Complex Demonstratives,” Philosophical Studies, 97: 225–244. (Scholar)
–––, 2007. “Minimalism versus Contextualism in Semantics,” in Preyer and Peter 2007, pp. 546–571. (Scholar)
Braun, David, 1994. “Structured Characters and Complex Demonstratives,” Philosophical Studies, 74: 193–219. (Scholar)
–––, 1995. “What Is Character?” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 24: 227–240. (Scholar)
–––, 1996. “Demonstratives and Their Linguistic Meanings,” Noûs, 30: 145–173. (Scholar)
–––, 2008. “Complex Demonstratives and Their Singular Contents,” Linguistics and Philosophy 31:57–99. (Scholar)
–––, 2012. “An Invariantist Theory of ‘Might’ Might Be Right,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 164: 461–489. (Scholar)
Burge, Tyler, 1974. “Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth,” Journal of Philosophy, 71: 205–223. (Scholar)
–––, 2012. “Living Wages of Sinn,” Journal of Philosophy, 109: 40–84. (Scholar)
Cappelen, H. and Dever, J., 2013. The Inessential Indexical : On the Philosophical Insignificance of Perspective and the First Person, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Cappelen, H. and Hawthorne, J., 2009. Relativism and Monadic Truth, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Cappelen, H. and Lepore, E., 2005. Insensitive Semantics, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. (Scholar)
Carston, Robyn, 2002. Thoughts and Utterances, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
Castañeda, Hector-Neri, 1966. “’He’: A Study in the Logic of Self-Consciousness,” Ratio, 8: 130–157. (Scholar)
–––, 1967. “Indicators and Quasi-Indicators,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 4: 85–100. (Scholar)
–––, 1975. Thinking and Doing, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
Chierchia, Gennaro, 1989. “Anaphora and Attitudes De Se,” in R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, and van Emde Boas (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expression, pp. 1–31. Dordrecht: Fortis. (Scholar)
–––, 1992. “Anaphora and Dynamic Binding,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 15: 111–183. (Scholar)
Chisholm, Roderick, 1981. The First Person: An Essay on Reference and Intentionality, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
Cohen, Jonathan, 2013. “Indexicality and the Puzzle of the Answering-Machine,” Journal of Philosophy 110:5–32. (Scholar)
Cohen, Stewart, 1988. “How to Be a Fallibilist,” Philosophical Perspectives, 2: 91–123. (Scholar)
Condoravdi, C. and Gawron, J. M., 1996. “The Context Dependency of Implicit Arguments,” in Makoto Kanazawa, Christopher Pinon, and Henriette de Swart (eds.), Quantifiers, Deduction, and Context, Stanford: CSLI, pp. 1–32. (Scholar)
Corazza, E., Fish, W., and Gorvett, J., 2002. “Who is I?” Philosophical Studies, 107: 1–21. (Scholar)
Crimmins, Mark, 1992. Talk About Beliefs, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
DeRose, Keith, 1995. “Solving the Skeptical Problem,” Philosophical Review, 104: 1–52. (Scholar)
Dever, Joshua, 2001. “Complex Demonstratives,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 24: 271–330. (Scholar)
Devitt, Michael, 1981. Designation, New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
Dowty, David, 1985. “On Recent Analyses of the Semantics of Control,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 8: 291–331. (Scholar)
Egan, Andy, 2006. “Secondary Qualities and Self-Location,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 72: 97–119. (Scholar)
Egan, A., Hawthorne, J., & Weatherson, B., 2005. “Epistemic modals in context,” in Preyer, Gerhard and George Peter (eds.). Contextualism in Philosophy, pp. 131–169. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Elbourne, Paul, 2008. “Demonstratives as Individuals Concepts,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 31: 409–466. (Scholar)
Enç, Mürvet, 1987. “Anchoring Conditions for Tense,” Linguistic Inquiry, 18: 633–657. (Scholar)
Evans, Gareth, 1985. “Understanding Demonstratives,” in Evans Collected Papers, pp. 291–321. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Fara, Delia Graff, 2000. “Shifting Sands: An Interest-Relative Theory of Vagueness,” Philosophical Topics, 20: 45–81. (Originally published under the name ‘Delia Graff’). (Scholar)
Frege, Gottlob, 1997. “Thought,” in Frege (ed. Michael Beaney), The Frege Reader, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 325–45. (Scholar)
Garcia-Carpintero, Manuel, 1998. “Indexicals as Token-Reflexives,” Mind, 107: 529–563. (Scholar)
Gauker, Christopher, 2012. “What Tipper is Ready for: A Semantics for Incomplete Predicates”, Noûs, 46: 61–85. (Scholar)
Heim, I. and Kratzer, A., 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
Kamp, Hans, 1971. “Formal Properties of ‘Now’,” Theoria, 37: 227–273. (Scholar)
Kamp, H. and Reyle, U., 1993. From Discourse to Logic, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
Kaplan, David, 1989a. “Demonstratives,” in Almog, Perry, and Wettstein 1989, pp. 481–563. (Scholar)
–––, 1989b. “Afterthoughts,” in Almog, Perry, and Wettstein 1989, pp. 565–614. (Scholar)
–––, 1999. “Reichenbach’s Elements of Symbolic Logic,” German translation in Maria Reichenbach and Andreas Kamlah (eds.), Hans Reichenbach, Collected Works in 9 Volumes, Wiesbaden: Vieweg & Sohn. (Scholar)
Kennedy, Christopher, 2007. “Vagueness and Grammar: The Semantics of Relative and Absolute Gradable Adjectives,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 30: 1–45 (Scholar)
King, Jeffrey, 2001. Complex Demonstratives: A Quantificational Account, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2003. “Tense, Modality, and Semantic Values,” Philosophical Perspectives, 17: 195–245. (Scholar)
–––, 2008a. “Complex Demonstratives as Quantifiers: Objections and Replies,” Philosophical Studies, 141: 209–242. (Scholar)
–––, 2008b. “Complex Demonstratives, QI Uses and Direct Reference,” Philosophical Review, 117: 99–117 (Scholar)
–––, 2013a. “Supplementives, The Coordination Account and Conflicting Intentions,” Philosophical Perspectives, 27: 288–311. (Scholar)
–––, 2013b. “Speaker Intentions in Context,” Noûs, 47: 218–237. (Scholar)
Kratzer, Angelika, 1977. “What ‘Must’ and ‘Can’ Must and Can Mean,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 1: 337–355. (Scholar)
–––, 2012. Modals and Conditionals, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Kripke, Saul, 1980. Naming and Necessity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Kripke, Saul, 2011. “Frege’s Theory of Sense and Reference,” in Kripke, Philosophical Troubles: Collected Papers, Volume 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Larson, R. and Segal, G., 1995. Knowledge of Meaning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Lasersohn, Peter, 2005. “Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 28: 643–686. (Scholar)
Lepore, E. and Johnson, K., 2002. “Does Syntax Reveal Semantics?: A Case Study of Complex Demonstratives,” Philosophical Perspectives, 16: 17–41. (Scholar)
Lepore, E. and Ludwig, K., 2000. “The Semantics and Pragmatics of Complex Demonstratives,” Mind, 109: 199–240. (Scholar)
Leslie, Sarah-Jane, 2007. “Moderately Sensitive Semantics,” in Preyer and Peter 2007, pp. 133–168. (Scholar)
Lewis, David, 1973. Counterfactuals, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
–––, 1979a. “Attitudes De Dicto and De Se,” Philosophical Review, 88: 513–43. Reprinted in Lewis 1983. (Scholar)
–––, 1979b. “Scorekeeping in a Language Game,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8: 339–59. Reprinted in Lewis 1983. (Scholar)
–––, 1980. “Index, Context, and Content,” in Stig Kanger and Sven Ohman (eds.), Philosophy and Grammar, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 79–100. Reprinted in David Lewis, 1998, Papers in Philosophical Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 21–44. (Scholar)
–––, 1983. Philosophical Papers Volume I, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1996. “Elusive Knowledge,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74: 549–567. Reprinted in David Lewis, 1999, Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Martinich, A.P. (ed.), 2001. Philosophy of Language, 4^th Edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
McDowell, John, 1998. Mind, Value, and Reality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
MacFarlane, John, 2011. “Epistemic Modals are Assessment-Sensitive,” in Andy Egan and Brian Weatherson (eds.), Epistemic Modality, pp. 144–178. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Magidor, Ofra, forthcoming. “The Myth of the De Se,” Philosophical Perspectives. (Scholar)
McGinn, Colin, 1981. “The Mechanism of Reference,” Synthese, 49: 157–186. (Scholar)
–––, 1983. The Subjective View: Secondary Qualities and Indexical Thought, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
Millikan, Ruth, 1990. “The Myth of the Essential Indexical,” Noûs, 24: 723–734. (Scholar)
Mount, Allyson, 2008. “The Impurity of ‘Pure’ Indexicals”. Philosophical Studies, 138: 193–209. (Scholar)
Nagel, Thomas, 1986. The View from Nowhere, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Neale, Stephen, 2004. “This, That, and the Other,” in Marga Reimer and Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.), Descriptions and Beyond, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 68–182. (Scholar)
–––, 2005. “Pragmatics and Binding,” in Zoltan Gendler Szabo (ed.), Semantics and Pragmatics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 165–285. (Scholar)
Ninan, Dilip, 2013. “Self-Location and Other-Location,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 87: 301–331. (Scholar)
Ogihara, Toshiyuki, 1996. Tense, Attitudes, and Scope, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
Partee, Barbara, 1973. “Some Structural Analogies Between Tenses and Pronouns in English,” Journal of Philosophy, 70: 601–609. (Scholar)
–––, 1989. “Binding Implicit Variables in Quantified Contexts,” Papers of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 25: 342–365. (Scholar)
Perry, John, 1977. “Frege on Demonstratives,” Philosophical Review, 86: 474–97. Reprinted in Perry 2000. (Scholar)
–––, 1979. “The Problem of the Essential Indexical,” Noûs, 13: 3–21. Reprinted in Perry 2000. (Scholar)
–––, 1997. “Indexicals and Demonstratives,” in Bob Hale and Crispin Wright (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Language, pp. 586–612. Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
–––, 1999. Knowledge, Possibility, and Consciousness, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2000. The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays, Expanded Edition, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
–––, 2001. Reference and Reflexivity, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
–––, 2009. “Directing Intentions,” in Joseph Almog and Paolo Leonardi (eds.), The Philosophy of David Kaplan, pp. 187–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Portner, Paul, 2009. Modality, Oxford: New York. (Scholar)
Predelli, Stefano, 1998a. “I Am Not Here Now,” Analysis, 58: 107–112. (Scholar)
–––, 1998b. “Utterance, Interpretation, and the Logic of Indexicals,” Mind and Language, 13: 400–414. (Scholar)
Preyer, G. and Peter, G. (eds.), 2007, Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Raffman, Diana, 1996. “Vagueness and Context-Sensitivity,” Philosophical Studies, 81: 175–182. (Scholar)
Recanati, Francois, 2004. Literal Meaning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Added Mar 19, reference on p. 8 (Scholar)
Reichenbach, Hans, 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic, New York: Macmillan. (Scholar)
Reimer, Marga, 1991a. “Demonstratives, Demonstrations, and Demonstrata,” Philosophical Studies, 63: 187–202. (Scholar)
–––, 1991b. “Do Demonstrations Have Semantic Significance?” Analysis, 51: 177–183. (Scholar)
Richard, Mark, 1990. Propositional Attitudes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1993. “Articulated Terms,” Philosophical Perspectives, 7: 207–230. (Scholar)
–––, 2003. “Indexicals” (revised version). In William Bright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, 2nd Edition., Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2008. When Truth Gives Out, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Roberts, Craige, 2002. “Demonstratives as Definites,” in Kees Van Deemter and Roger Kibble (eds.), Information Sharing, pp. 1–48. Stanford, CA: CSLI Press. (Scholar)
Romdenh-Romluc, K., 2002. “Now the French are Invading England!” Analysis, 62: 34–41. (Scholar)
Salmon, Nathan, 1981. Reference and Essence, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1986. Frege’s Puzzle, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Reprinted 1991 by Ridgeview Publishing (Atascadero, CA). (Scholar)
–––, 1989. “Tense and Singular Propositions,” in Almog, Perry, and Wettstein 1989, pp. 331–392. (Scholar)
–––, 1991. “How Not to Become a Millian Heir,” Philosophical Studies, 62: 165–177. (Scholar)
–––, 2002. “Demonstrating and Necessity,” Philosophical Review, 111: 497–537. (Scholar)
–––, 2006. “A Theory of Bondage,” Philosophical Review, 115: 415–448. (Scholar)
Schiffer, Stephen, 1978. “The Basis of Reference,” Erkenntnis, 13: 171–206. (Scholar)
–––, 1981. “Indexicals and the Theory of Reference,” Synthese, 49: 43–100. (Scholar)
Schlenker, Philippe, 2003. “A Plea for Monsters,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 26: 29–120. (Scholar)
Sennett, Adam, 2008. “The Binding Argument and Pragmatic Enrichment, or Why Philosophers Care Even More than Weathermen about ‘Raining’,” Philosophy Compass, 3: 135–157. (Scholar)
Smith, Quentin, 1989. “The Multiple Uses of Indexicals,” Synthese, 78: 167–191. (Scholar)
Soames, Scott, 1999. Understanding Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2009. “The Gap between Meaning and Assertion,” in Philosophical Essays, Volume 1, pp. 278–297. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Stalnaker, Robert, 1981. “Indexical Belief,” Synthese, 49: 129–151. (Scholar)
–––, 2008. Our Knowledge of the Internal World, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Stanley, J. and Szabo, Z., 2000. “On Quantifier Domain Restriction,” Mind & Language, 15: 219–261. (Scholar)
Stephenson, Tamina, 2007. “Judge Dependence, Epistemic Modals, and Predicates of Personal Taste,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 30: 487–525. (Scholar)
Taschek, William, 1987. “Content, Character, and Cognitive Significance,” Philosophical Studies, 52: 161–189. (Scholar)
Vlach, Frank, 1973. “‘Now’ and ‘Then’: A Formal Study in the Logic of Tense and Anaphora,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Philosophy Department, UCLA. (Scholar)
Von Fintel, Kai, 1994: Restrictions on Quantifier Domains, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts/Amherst. (Scholar)
Weinstein, Scott, 1974. “Truth and Demonstratives,” Noûs, 8: 179–184. (Scholar)
Wettstein, Howard, 1984. “How to Bridge the Gap Between Meaning and Reference,” Synthese, 84: 63–84. (Scholar)
–––, 1986. “Has Semantics Rested on a Mistake?” Journal of Philosophy, 83: 185–209. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Jan 19 22:37:37 2025

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...