Linked bibliography for the SEP article "The Distinction Between Innate and Acquired Characteristics" by Paul Griffiths and Stefan Linquist
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Ariew, André, 1996, “Innateness and Canalization,” Philosophy of Science (Supplement), 63(3): S19–27. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, “Innateness Is Canalization: In Defense of a Developmental Account of Innateness”, in Where Biology Meets Psychology: Philosophical Essays, Valerie Gray Hardcastle (ed.), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 117–38. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, “Innateness,” in Philosophy of Biology, M. Matthen and C. Stephens (eds.), Amsterdam: Elsevier, 567–84. (Scholar)
- Atran, Scott, Douglas I. Medin, and Norbert Ross, 2002, “Thinking about Biology. Modular Constraints on Categorization and Reasoning in the Everyday Life of Americans, Maya, and Scientists,” Mind and Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, 3(2): 31–63. (Scholar)
- Baldwin, J. M., 1896, “A New Factor in Evolution,”
American Naturalist, 30 (June and July): 441–451,
536–553. (Scholar)
- Bateson, Patrick P. G., 1966, “The Characteristics and
Context of Imprinting,” Biological Reviews of the Cambridge
Philosophical Society, 41(2): 177–217. (Scholar)
- –––, 1991, “Are There Principles of
Behavioural Development?” in The Development and Integration
of Behaviour: Essays in Honour of Robert Hinde, Patrick P. G.
Bateson (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
19–39. (Scholar)
- Bateson, Patrick, and Matteo Mameli, 2007, “The Innate and
the Acquired: Useful Clusters or a Residual Distinction from Folk
Biology?” Developmental Psychobiology, 49:
818–31. (Scholar)
- Bernard, Luther Lee, 1921, “The Misuse of Instinct in the Social Sciences,” Psychological Review, 28(2): 96–119. (Scholar)
- –––, 1924, Instinct: A Study in Social Psychology, New York: Henry Holt and Company. (Scholar)
- Boakes, Robert, 1984, From Darwin to Behaviourism: Psychology
and the Minds of Animals, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. (Scholar)
- Boyd, R., 1989, “What Realism Implies and What It Does Not,” Dialectica, 43(1–2): 5–29. (Scholar)
- Brigandt, Ingo, 2005, “The Instinct Concept of the Early Konrad Lorenz,” Journal of the History of Biology, 38: 571–608. (Scholar)
- Browne, Derek, 2005, “Konrad Lorenz on Instinct and
Phylogenetic Information,” from The Rutherford
Journal, 1
[Browne 2005 available online]. (Scholar)
- Buller, Mark, 2006, Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology
and the Persisting Quest for Human Nature, Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press. (Scholar)
- Burkhardt Jr., Richard W., 2005, Patterns of Behavior: Konrad
Lorenz, Niko Tinbergen and the Founding of Ethology, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Carey, Susan, and Elizabeth Spelke, 1996, “Science and Core Knowledge,” Philosophy of Science, 63(4): 515–33. (Scholar)
- Carmichael, L., 1925, “Heredity and Environment: Are They
Antithetical?” Journal of Abnormal and Social
Psychology, 20: 245–60. (Scholar)
- Carruthers, Peter, Stephen Laurence, and Stephen P. Stich, 2005,
The Innate Mind (Volume 1: Structure and Contents),
New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007a, The Innate Mind (Volume 2:
Culture and Cognition), New York: Oxford University
Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007b, The Innate Mind (Volume 3:
Foundations and the Future), New York: Oxford University
Press. (Scholar)
- Cassidy, John, 1979, “Half a Century on the Concepts of
Innateness and Instinct: Survey, Synthesis and Philosophical
Implications,” Zeitschrift Für Tierpsychologie,
50: 364–86. (Scholar)
- Cheung, Benjamin Y., Ilan Dar-Nimrod, and Karen Gonsalkorale,
2014, “Am I My Genes? Perceived Genetic Etiology, Intrapersonal
Processes, and Health,” Social and Personality Psychology
Compass, 8(11): 626–37. (Scholar)
- Chomsky, Noam, 1957, Syntactic Structures, The Hague: Morton. (Scholar)
- –––, 1959, “Review of B.F. Skinner’s
‘Verbal Behaviour’,” Language, 35:
26–58. (Scholar)
- –––, 1966, Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought, New York: Harper & Row. (Scholar)
- Claidière, Nicolas, and Daniel Sperber, 2007, “The Role of Attraction in Cultural Evolution,” Journal of Cognition and Culture, 7: 89–111. (Scholar)
- Cofnas, Nathan, 2017, “Innateness as Genetic Adaptation: Lorenz Redivivus (and Revised),” Biology & Philosophy, 32: 559–80. (Scholar)
- Cowie, Fiona, 1998, What’s Within? Nativism
Reconsidered, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Cowie, Fiona, 2009, “Why Isn’t Stich an
Eliminativist?” in D. Murphy and M. A. Bishop (eds.), Stich
and His Critics, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 74–100. (Scholar)
- Cravens, Hamilton, 1978, The Triumph of Evolution: American
Scientists and the Heredity-Environment Controversy,
1900–1941, University of Pennsylvania Press. (Scholar)
- Cravens, Hamilton, and John C. Burnham, 1971, “Psychology
and Evolutionary Naturalism in American Thought,
1890–1940,” American Quarterly, 23(5):
635–657. (Scholar)
- Cushman, Fiery, Joshua Knobe, and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, 2008, “Moral Appraisals Affect Doing/Allowing Judgments,” Cognition, 108: 281–289. (Scholar)
- Dar-Nimrod, Ilan, and Steven J. Heine, 2006, “Exposure to
Scientific Theories Affects Women’s Math Performance,”
Science, 314(5798): 435–435. (Scholar)
- Dar-Nimrod, Ilan, and Steven J. Heine, 2011, “Genetic
Essentialism: On the Deceptive Determinism of DNA,”
Psychological Bulletin, 137(5): 800–818. (Scholar)
- Darwin, Charles, 1859, On the Origin of Species or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, New York: D. Appleton and Co. (Scholar)
- –––, 1871, The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, New York: D. Appleton and Co. (Scholar)
- Dennett, Daniel, 1986, “Philosophy as Mathematics or as Anthropology,” Mind & Language, 1(1): 18–19. (Scholar)
- Dewsbury, Donald A, 1993, “William James and Instinct Theory
Revisited,” in M. E. Donnelly (ed.), Reinterpreting the
Legacy of William James, New York: American Psychological
Association. (Scholar)
- Dunlap, K., 1919, “Are There Any Instincts?”
Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 14:307–311. (Scholar)
- Fodor, Jerry, 1975, The Language of Thought, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1981, Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Ford, Donald H, and Richard M Lerner, 1992, Developmental
Systems Theory: An Integrative Approach, Newbury Park, CA:
Sage. (Scholar)
- Gaj, Nicolò, 2016, Unity and Fragmentation in Psychology: The Philosophical and Methodological Roots of the Discipline, Basingstoke: Taylor & Francis. (Scholar)
- Geiger, J. R., 1922, “Must We Give up Instincts in Psychology?” Journal of Philosophy, 19: 94–98. (Scholar)
- Gibson, Gregory, and Günter Wagner, 2000, “Canalization in Evolutionary Genetics: A Stabilizing Theory?” BioEssays, 22: 372–80. (Scholar)
- Godfrey-Smith, Peter, 1996, Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, “Genes and Codes: Lessons from
the Philosophy of Mind?” in Valerie G Hardcastle (ed.),
Biology Meets Psychology: Constraints, Conjectures,
Connections, 305–331, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Gottesman, Irving I., 1963, “Genetic Aspects of Intelligent
Behavior,” in N. R. Ellis (ed.), Handbook of Mental
Deficiency, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.,
253–296. (Scholar)
- Gottlieb, Gilbert, 1995, “Some Conceptual Deficiencies in
‘Developmental’ Behavior Genetics,” Human
Development, 38(3): 131–141. (Scholar)
- Gould, Stephen Jay, 1980, “Wallace’s Fatal
Flaw,” Natural History (Pre-1988), 89(1):
26–40. (Scholar)
- Griffiths, Paul E., 2002, “What Is Innateness?” The Monist, 85(1): 70–85. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, “Instinct in the ’50s:
The British Reception of Konrad Lorenz’s Theory of Instinctive
Behaviour,” Biology and Philosophy, 19(4):
609–631. (Scholar)
- Griffiths, Paul E., and Russell D. Gray, 2005, “Three Ways
to Misunderstand Developmental Systems Theory,” Biology
& Philosophy, 20(2): 417–425. (Scholar)
- Griffiths, Paul E., and Edouard Machery, 2008, “Innateness,
Canalisation and ‘Biologicizing the Mind,’”
Philosophical Psychology, 21(3): 397–414. (Scholar)
- Griffiths, Paul E., Edouard Machery, and Stefan Linquist, 2009,
“The Vernacular Concept of Innateness,” Mind and
Language, 24(5): 605–630. (Scholar)
- Grinnell, George James, 1985, “The Rise and Fall of
Darwin’s Second Theory,” Journal of the History of
Biology, 18(1): 51–70. (Scholar)
- Gross, Charles, 2010, “Alfred Russell Wallace and the
Evolution of the Human Mind,” The Neuroscientist,
16(5): 496–507. (Scholar)
- Gross, Steven, and Georges Rey, 2012, “Innateness,” in Eric Margolis, Richard Samuels, and Stephen Stich (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Hampton, Simon J., 2004, “The Instinct Debate and the
Standard Social Sciences Model,” Sexualities, Evolution
& Gender, 6: 15–44. (Scholar)
- Harlow, H.F., 1953, “Mice, Monkeys, Men and Motives,” Psychological Review, 60: 23–32. (Scholar)
- Herrnstein, R J., 1972, “Nature as Nurture: Behaviorism and the Instinct Doctrine,” Behaviorism, 1(1): 23–52. (Scholar)
- Hinde, R. A., 1968, “Dichotomies in the Study of
Development,” in J. M. Thoday and A. S. Parkes (eds.),
Genetic and Environmental Influences on Behaviour, New York:
Plenum, 3–14. (Scholar)
- Hogben, L., 1933, Nature and Nurture, Being the William
Withering Memorial Lectures, London: George Allen and Unwin
Ltd. (Scholar)
- Holtzer, H., 1968, “Induction of Chondrogenesis. A Concept
in Terms of Mechanisms,” in R. Glieschmajer and R. Billingham
(eds.), Epithelial-Mesenchymal Interactions, Baltimore:
William and Wilkins. (Scholar)
- Honeycutt, Hunter, 2011, “The ‘Enduring Mission’
of Zing-Yang Kuo to Eliminate the Nature-Nurture Dichotomy in
Psychology,” Developmental Psychobiology, 53(4):
331–342. (Scholar)
- James, William, 1890, The Principles of Psychology, New York: Holt and Company. (Scholar)
- Johnston, Timothy D., 1987, “The Persistence of Dichotomies
in the Study of Behavioral Development,” Developmental
Review, 7(2): 149–182. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995, “The Influence of
Weismann’s Germ-Plasm Theory on the Distinction between Learned
and Innate Behavior,” Journal of the History of the
Behavioral Sciences, 31(2): 115–128. (Scholar)
- Keil, F.C., 1989, Concepts, Kinds and Cognitive Development, Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Kemp, J. F., 1896, “New York Academy of Sciences,”
Science, 3(66): 530. (Scholar)
- Khalidi, Muhammad Ali, 2002, “Nature and Nurture in Cognition,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 53: 251–272. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, “Innate Cognitive Capacities,” Mind & Language, 22(1): 92–115. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Should We Eliminate the Innate? Reply to Griffiths and Machery,” Philosophical Psychology, 22(4): 505–19. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, “Innateness as a Natural Cognitive Kind,” Philosophical Psychology, 29(3): 319–33. (Scholar)
- Kitcher, Philip, 2001, “Battling the Undead: How (and How
Not) to Resist Genetic Determinism,” in R. Singh, K. Krimbas, D.
Paul, and J. Beatty (eds.), Thinking about Evolution: Historical,
Philosophical and Political Perspectives (Festchrifft for Richard
Lewontin), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
396–414. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989, “Explanatory Unification and
the Causal Structure of the World,” in Philip Kitcher and Wesley
Salmon (eds.), Scientific Explanation, Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press, 410–505. (Scholar)
- Knobe, Joshua, and Gabriel S. Mendlow, 2004, “The Good, the Bad and the Blameworthy: Understanding the Role of Evaluative Reasoning in Folk Psychology,” Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 24: 252–258. (Scholar)
- Knobe, Joshua, and Richard Samuels, 2013, “Thinking like a Scientist: Innateness as a Case Study,” Cognition, 126(1): 72–86. (Scholar)
- Kuo, Zing Yang, 1921, “Giving up Instincts in Psychology,” The Journal of Philosophy, 18(24): 645–664. https://doi.org/10.2307/2939656. (Scholar)
- –––, 1922, “How Are Our Instincts Acquired?” Psychological Review, 29: 344–365. (Scholar)
- –––, 1924, “A Psychology without Heredity,” Psychological Review, 31: 427–448. (Scholar)
- –––, 1929, “The Net Result of the Anti-Heredity Movement in Psychiatry,” Psychological Review, 36: 181–199. (Scholar)
- Laland, Kevin N, and Gillian R Brown, 2002, Sense and Nonsense: Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behaviour, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Laudan, Larry, 1977, Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Lehrman, Daniel S., 1953, “Critique of Konrad Lorenz’s
Theory of Instinctive Behavior,” Quarterly Review of
Biology, 28(4): 337–363. (Scholar)
- –––, 1970, “Semantic & Conceptual
Issues in the Nature-Nurture Problem,” in D. S. Lehrman (ed.),
Development & Evolution of Behaviour, San Francisco: W.
H. Freeman and Co., 17–52. (Scholar)
- Lewens, Tim, 2020, “Species Natures: A Critique of Neo-Aristotelian Ethics,” The Philosophical Quarterly, 70(280): 480–501. (Scholar)
- Lewontin, R., 1974, “The Analysis of Variance & the Analysis of Causes,” American Journal of Human Genetics, 26: 400–411. (Scholar)
- Linquist, Stefan, 2018, “The Conceptual Critique of Innateness,” Philosophy Compass, 13(5): e12492. (Scholar)
- Linquist, Stefan, Edouard Machery, Paul E. Griffiths, and Karola Stotz, 2011, “Exploring the Folkbiological Conception of Human Nature,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366: 444–453. (Scholar)
- Lloyd Morgan, Conwy, 1895, “Some Definitions of
Instinct,” Natural Sciences, 7: 321–329. (Scholar)
- –––, 1896, Habit and Instinct, New
York: Edward Arnold. (Scholar)
- Lorenz, Konrad Z., 1957, “The Nature of Instinct,” in
Claire H Schiller (ed.), Instinctive Behavior: The Development of
a Modern Concept, New York: International Universities Press,
129–175. (Scholar)
- –––, 1965, Evolution & the Modification
of Behaviour, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Lorenz, Konrad Z., and Nikolaas Tinbergen, 1957, “Taxis and
Instinct: Taxis and Instinctive Action in the Egg-Retrieving Behavior
of the Graylag Goose,” in Claire H Schiller (ed.),
Instinctive Behavior: The Development of a Modern Concept,
New York: International Universities Press. (Scholar)
- Machery, Edouard, 2017, Philosophy Within Its Proper Bounds, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Machery, Edouard, Paul E Griffiths, Stefan Linquist, and Karola
Stotz, 2019, “Scientists’ Conception of Innateness:
Evolution or Attraction?” in D. A. Wilkenfeld and R. Samuels
(eds.), Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Science,
172–204, New York: Blumsbury Academic. (Scholar)
- Mallon, Ron, and Jonathon Weinberg, 2006, “Innateness as Closed-Process Invariantism,” Philosophy of Science, 73(3): 323–44. (Scholar)
- Mameli, Matteo, 2004, “Nongenetic Selection and Nongenetic Inheritance,” The British Journal For The Philosophy Of Science, 55: 35–71. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, “On Innateness: The Clutter
Hypothesis,” Journal of Philosophy, 105(12):
719–736. (Scholar)
- Mameli, Matteo, and Patrick Bateson, 2011, “An Evaluation of
the Concept of Innateness,” Philosophical Transactions of
the Royal Society B, 366: 436–443. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, “Innateness and the Sciences,” Biology and Philosophy, 21(2): 155–188. (Scholar)
- Marcus, Gary F., 2004, The Birth of the Mind: How a Tiny Number of Genes Creates the Complexities of Human Thought, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
- Mayr, Ernst, 1961, “Cause and Effect in Biology,”
Science, 134(3489): 1501–6. (Scholar)
- McDougall, W., 1908, Introduction to Social Psychology,
London: Methuen. (Scholar)
- Medin, Douglas L., and Scott Atran, (eds.), 1999, Folkbiology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Medin, Douglas L., and Scott Atran, 2004, “The Native Mind: Biological Categorization and Reasoning in Development and Across Cultures,” Psychological Review, 111(4): 960–983. (Scholar)
- Medin, Douglas, and Anthony Ortony, 1989, “Psychological
Essentialism,” in Stella Vosniadou and Andrew Ortony (eds.),
Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 175–195. (Scholar)
- Michel, George F., and Celia L. Moore, 1995, Developmental
Psychobiology: An Interdisciplinary Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press. (Scholar)
- Milkowski, Marcin, Mateusz Hohol, and Przemyslaw Nowakowski, 2019, “Mechanisms in Psychology: The Road towards Unity,” Theory & Psychology, 29: 567–578. (Scholar)
- Moltz, Howard, 1960, “Imprinting: Empirical Basis and
Theoretical Significance,” Psychological Bulletin,
57(4): 291–314. (Scholar)
- –––, 1965, “Contemporary Instinct Theory and the Fixed Action Pattern,” Psychological Review, 72(27–47). (Scholar)
- Moore, Celia L., 1992, “The Role of Maternal Stimulation in
the Development of Sexual Behavior and Its Neural Basis,”
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 662:
160–177. (Scholar)
- Northcott, Robert, 2013, “Degree of Explanation,”
Synthese, 190(15): 3087–3105. (Scholar)
- Northcott, Robert, and Gualtiero Piccinini, 2018, “Conceived This Way: Innateness Defended,” Philosophers’ Imprint, 18: 1–16. (Scholar)
- O’Neill, Elizabeth R. H., 2014, “Relativizing
Innateness: Innateness as the Insensitivity of the Appearance of a
Trait with Respect to Specified Environmental Variation,”
Biology & Philosophy, 30(2): 211–225. (Scholar)
- Oyama, Susan, 1985, The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental
Systems and Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. (Scholar)
- Perovic, Slobodan, and Ljiljana Radenovic, 2011,
“Fine-Tuning Nativism: The ‘Nurtured Nature’ and
Innate Cognitive Structures,” Phenomenology and the
Cognitive Sciences, 10(3): 399–417. (Scholar)
- Petit, Dean, and Joshua Knobe, 2009, “The Pervasive Impact of Moral Judgment,” Mind & Language, 24: 586–604. (Scholar)
- Richards, Robert J., 1974, “The Innate and the Learned: The
Evolution of Konrad Lorenz’s Theory of Instinct,”
Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 4: 111–133. (Scholar)
- –––, 1981, “Instinct and Intelligence in
British Natural Theology: Some Contributions to Darwin’s Theory
of the Evolution of Behavior,” Journal of the History of
Biology, 14(2): 193–230. (Scholar)
- –––, 1987, Darwin and the Emergence of
Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior, Chicago: University
of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Rochowiak, Daniel, 1988, “Darwin’s Psychological
Theorizing: Triangulating on Habit,” Studies in History
& Philosophy of Science, 19: 215–241. (Scholar)
- Romanes, George John, 1882, Animal Intelligence, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, and Co. (Scholar)
- –––, 1883, Mental Evolution in Animals, with
a Posthumous Essay on Instinct by Charles Darwin, London: Kegan
Paul, Trench & Co. (Scholar)
- Samuels, Richard, 1998, “What Brains Won’t Tell Us
about the Mind: A Critique of the Neurobiological Argument against
Representational Nativism,” Mind & Language, 13:
548–570. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, “Nativism in Cognitive Science,” Mind and Language, 17(3): 233–265. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, “Innateness and Cognitive Science,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8: 136–141. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, “Is Innateness a Confused
Notion?” in Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence, and Stephen
Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Foundations and the Future,
Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, “The Concept of Innateness as an Object of Empirical Enquiry,” in J. Sytsma and W. Buckwalter (eds.), A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, New York: John Wiley & Sons. (Scholar)
- Schaffner, Kenneth F., 1998, “Genes, Behavior and Developmental Emergentism: One Process, Indivisible?” Philosophy of Science, 65(2): 209–252. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, Behaving: What’s genetic, what’s not, and why should we care?, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Sarkar, Sahotra, 1999, “From the Reaktionsnorm to the Adaptive Norm: The Norm of Reaction, 1909–1960,” Biology & Philosophy, 14(2): 235–252. (Scholar)
- Schank, J. C, and W. C. Wimsatt, 1986, “Generative Entrenchment and Evolution,” Philosophy of Science Association, 2: 33–60. (Scholar)
- Schneirla, Theodore C., 1952, “A Consideration of Some
Conceptual Trends in Comparative Psychology,” Psychological
Bulletin, 49: 559–597. (Scholar)
- –––, 1966, “Behavioral Development and
Comparative Psychology,” The Quarterly Review of
Biology, 41: 283–302. (Scholar)
- Schneirla, Theodore C., and Jay S. Rosenblatt, 1963,
“‘Critical Periods’ in the Development of
Behavior,” Science, 139: 1110–1115. (Scholar)
- Seligman, M. E. P., 1970, “On the Generality of the Laws of Learning,” Psychological Review, 77: 406–418. (Scholar)
- Shea, Nicholas, 2007, “Representation in the Genome and in Other Inheritance Systems,” Biology and Philosophy, 22: 313–331. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Genetic Representation Explains the Cluster of Innateness-Related Properties,” Mind & Language, 27: 466–493. (Scholar)
- Sober, Elliott, 1980, “Evolution, Population Thinking and Essentialism,” Philosophy of Science, 47(3): 350–383. (Scholar)
- –––, 1988, “Apportioning Causal Responsibility,” Journal of Philosophy, 85: 303–318. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, “Innate Knowledge,” in E.
Craig and L. Floridi (eds.), Routledge Encyclopedia of
Philosophy, London: Routledge, 794–797. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, “Appendix One: The Meaning of
Genetic Causation,” in A. Buchanan (ed.), From Chance to
Choice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
347–370. (Scholar)
- Sperber, Daniel, 1996, Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Sterelny, Kim, 2003, Thought in a Hostile World, Malden, MA: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Sterelny, Kim, Michael Dickison, and Kelly Smith, 1996, “The Extended Replicator,” Biology and Philosophy, 11(3): 377–403. (Scholar)
- Stich, Stephen P., 1975, “The Idea of Innateness,” in
S. P Stich (ed.), Innate Ideas, Berkeley: University of
California Press. (Scholar)
- Stotz, Karola, and Paul E. Griffiths, 2018, “A Developmental
Systems Account of Human Nature,” in Timothy Lewens and
Elizabeth Hannon (eds.), Why We Disagree About Human Nature,
58–75, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Tabery, James G., 2014, Beyond Versus: The Struggle to
Understand the Interaction of Nature and Nurture, Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Tinbergen, Nikolaas, 1942, “An Objectivist Study of the
Innate Behaviour of Animals,” Bibliotheca Biotheoretica
D, 1(2): 39–98. (Scholar)
- –––, 1951, The Study of Instinct,
Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1963, “On the Aims and Methods of
Ethology,” Zietschrift Für Tierpsychologie, 20:
410–433. (Scholar)
- Tolman, Edward Chase, 1922, “Can Instincts Be Given Up In
Psychology?” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,
17: 139–152. (Scholar)
- Tomkins, Silvan S., 1962, Affect, Imagery and
Consciousness, New York: Springer. (Scholar)
- Twomey, Steve, 2010, “Phineas Gage: Neuroscience’s
Most Famous Patient,” Smithsonian Magazine, January
2010. (Scholar)
- Waddington, C.H., 1957, The Strategy of the Genes: A
Discussion of Some Aspects of Theoretical Biology, London:
Routledge. (Scholar)
- Wallace, Alfred Russel, 1891, Natural Selection and Tropical
Nature, London: Macmillan. (Scholar)
- Weinberg, Jonathon, and Ron Mallon, 2008, “Living with Innateness (and Environmental Dependence Too),” Philosophical Psychology, 21(3): 415–24. (Scholar)
- Weismann, August, 1891, “On the Supposed Botanical Proofs of
the Transmission of Acquired Characters,” in Edward B. Poulton,
Selmar Schonland, and Arthur E. Shipley (eds.), Essays Upon
Heredity and Kindred Biological Problems, Oxford: Clarendon
Press, 397–430. (Scholar)
- West-Eberhard, Mary Jane, 2003, Developmental Plasticity and
Evolution, Oxford University Press. (Scholar)