Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Innateness and Contemporary Theories of Cognition" by Jerry Samet and Deborah Zaitchik

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

  • Aguiar, A., & R. Baillargeon, 1999, 2.5-month-old infants' reasoning about when objects should and should not be occluded. Cognitive Psychology, 39: 116–57.
  • Andrews, K., 2010, “Animal Cognition”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall201/entries/cognition-animal/>. (Scholar)
  • Baillargeon, R., 1987, “Object permanence in 3½- and 4½-month-old infants,” Developmental Psychology, 23(5): 655–664. (Scholar)
  • Baillargeon, R., E. Spelke, & S. Wasserman, 1985, “Object permanence in 5-month-old infants.” Cognition, 20: 191–208. (Scholar)
  • Bechtel, G. & A. Abrahamsen, 1999, “The Life of Cognitive Science.” In Bechtel, W. & Graham, G. (eds.) A companion to cognitive science, pp. 1–104. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. (Scholar)
  • Bloom, P. & T. P. German, 2000, “Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind,” Cognition. 77(1): B25–31. (Scholar)
  • Burge, T., 2010, Origins of Objectivity, New York, Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Carey, S., 2009, The Origin of Concepts, New York, Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Carey, S. & S. Gelman, 1991. The Epigenesis of mind: essays on biology and cognition, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Scholar)
  • Carey, S. & E. Spelke, 1996, “Science and core knowledge,” Philosophy of Science, 63: 515–533. (Scholar)
  • Carruthers, P., 2006, The architecture of the mind: massive modularity and the flexibility of thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • Carruthers, P., S. Laurence, & S. Stich (eds.), 2005, The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (eds.), 2007, The Innate Mind, Vol. 3: Foundations and the Future, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Chater, N., J.B. Tenenbaum, & A. Yuille, 2006, “Probabilistic models of cognition: where next?” (Editorial), Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 10(7): 292–293. (Scholar)
  • Chater, N. and Manning, C.D., 2006 “Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(7): 335–344. (Scholar)
  • Chomsky, N., 1959. “Review of Verbal Behavior,” Language, 35: 26–58. (Scholar)
  • Chomsky, N., 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press. (Scholar)
  • Chomsky, N., 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York/London: Harper & Row. (Scholar)
  • Chomsky, N., 1975. Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon. (Scholar)
  • Cowie, F., 2010 “Innateness and Language”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/innateness-language/>. (Scholar)
  • Csibra, G., S. Biro, O. Koos, & G. Gergely, 2003, “One-year-old infants use teleological representations of actions productively,” Cognitive Science, 27: 111–113. (Scholar)
  • Csibra, G., G. Gergely, S. Biro, O. Koos, & M. Brockbank, 1999, “Goal attribution without agency cues: The perception of ‘pure reason’ in infancy,” Cognition, 72: 237–267. (Scholar)
  • Darwin, C., 1998/1872, The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, London: Harper Collins. (Scholar)
  • Dehaene, S., 1997, The number sense. Oxford University Press, Penguin Press, New York, Cambridge UK. (Scholar)
  • Dehaene, S., V. Izard, E. Spelke, & P. Pica, 2008, “Log or linear Distinct Intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian Indigene Culture,” Science 320(5880): 1217–20. (Scholar)
  • Dehaene, S. & J. Mehler, 1997, “Numerical transformations in five month old human infants,” Mathematical Cognition, 3(2): 89–104. (Scholar)
  • Dennett, D., 1978, “Beliefs about beliefs (commentary on Premack & Woodruff),” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1: 568–70. (Scholar)
  • Descartes, R., 1911/1647, “Notes Directed Against a Certain Program”, in Haldane and Ross, eds. The Philosophical Works of Descartes, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Descartes, R., 1996/1641, Meditations on First Philosophy, translated by John Cottingham, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Doherty, M. J., 2009, Theory of Mind: How Children Understand Others' Thoughts and Feelings. Hove, UK: Psychology Press. (Scholar)
  • Downes, S., 2010 “Evolutionary Psychology”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/evolutionary-psychology>. (Scholar)
  • Feigenson, L., S. Carey, 2005, “On the limits of infants' quantification of small object arrays,” Cognition, 97(3): 295–313. (Scholar)
  • Ferrari, P.F., E. Visalberghi, A. Paukner, L. Fogassi, A. Ruggiero, et al., 2006, “Neonatal Imitation in Rhesus Macaques,” PLoS Biol 4(9): e302. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040302. [Available online] (Scholar)
  • Flanagan, O., 1991, Science of the Mind, 2nd edition, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Flombaum, J. I. & L. R. Santos, 2005, “Rhesus Monkeys Attribute Perceptions to Others,” Current Biology, 15(5): 447–452. (Scholar)
  • Fodor, J. A., 1981, “The Present Status of the Innateness Controversy,” in Representations: philosophical essays on the foundations of cognitive science, pp. 225–253. Array Montgomery, Vt.: Bradford Books. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1983, The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Fodor, J. & Z. Pylyshyn, 1988, “Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: a Critical Analysis,” Cognition, 28: 3–71. (Scholar)
  • Frisch, K. von, 1953, The Dancing Bees. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc: New York, NY. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1971, Bees: their vision, chemical senses, and language. Array Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
  • Gallistel, C.R., 2000, “The Replacement of General-Purpose Learning Models with Adaptively Specialized Learning Modules,” in M.S. Gazzaniga, Ed. The Cognitive Neurosciences. 2d ed. (1179–1191) Cambridge, MA. MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Garcia J, D. J. Kimeldorf, & R. A. Koelling, 1955, “Conditioned aversion to saccharin resulting from exposure to gamma radiation,” Science, 122(3160): 157–8. (Scholar)
  • Garson, James, 2010, “Connectionism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <Connectionism/" target="other">https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/Connectionism/>. (Scholar)
  • Gelman, R. & C. R. Gallistel, 1978, The Child's Understanding of Number, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Gergely, G., H. Bekkering, & I. Kiraly, 2002, “Rational imitation in preverbal infants,” Nature, 415(6873): 755. (Scholar)
  • Gopnik, A. & L. Schulz, (eds.) 2007, Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation, Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Griffiths, T.L. & J. B. Tenenbaum, 2005, “Structure and strength in causal induction,” Cognitive Psychology, 51: 334–384. (Scholar)
  • Griffiths, T.L. & A. Yuille, 2006, “Technical introduction: a primer on probabilistic inference,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(7). Supplement to special issue on Probabilistic Models of Cognition. (Scholar)
  • Griffiths, T.L., D.M. Sobel, J.B. Tenenbaum, & A. Gopnik, 2011, “Bayes and blickets: Effects of knowledge on causal induction in children and adults,” Cognitive Science, 35(8): 1407–1455. (Scholar)
  • Gross, S. and G. Rey, 2012, “Innateness,” in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science, Eric Margolis, Richard Samuels, and Stephen P. Stich (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Hamlin, J. K., K. Wynn, & P. Bloom, 2007, “Social evaluation by preverbal infants,” Nature, 450: 557–559. (Scholar)
  • Hare, B., J. Call, B. Agnetta, & M. Tomasello, 2000, “Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see,” Animal Behaviour, 59: 771–786. (Scholar)
  • Harman, G., 1967, “Psychological aspects of the theory of syntax,” Journal of Philosophy, LXIV: 75–87. (Scholar)
  • Hauser, M.D., F. Tsao, P. Garcia, E.S. Spelke, 2003, “Evolutionary foundations of number: spontaneous representation of numerical magnitudes by cotton-top tamarins,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270(1573): 1441–1446. (Scholar)
  • Hauser, M. D., 2006. Moral minds: how nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. Array New York: Ecco. (Scholar)
  • Helmholtz, H. von, I867/1962, Treatise on physiological optics (J. P. C. Southall, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Scholar)
  • Hershberger, W., 1970, “Attached-shadow orientation perceived as depth by chickens reared in an environment illuminated from below,” Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 73(3): 407–11. (Scholar)
  • Hook, S. (ed.), 1969, Language and Philosophy: A Symposium. NY: NYU Press. (Scholar)
  • Hummel, J & I. Biederman, 1992, “Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition,” Psychological Review, 99(3): 480–517. (Scholar)
  • Izard, V., C. Sann, E. S. Spelke, and A. Streri, 2009, “Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers,” PNAS, 106(25): 10382–10385. (Scholar)
  • Joyce, J., 2008. “Bayes' Theorem”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = [https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/bayes-theorem/]. (Scholar)
  • Kahneman, D. & A. Tversky, 1972, “Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness,” Cognitive Psychology, 3(2): 430–454. (Scholar)
  • Kersten, D., P. Mamassian, & A. Yuille, 2004, “Object perception as Bayesian inference,” Annual Review of Psychology, 55: 271–304. (Scholar)
  • Knill, D. & W. Richards (eds.), 1996, Perception as Bayesian Inference. Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Koechlin, E., S. Dehaene, & J. Mehler, 1998, “Numerical transformations in five-month-old human infants,” Journal of Mathematical Cognition, 3: 89–104. (Scholar)
  • Kuhlmeier, V.A., P. Bloom, & K. Wynn, 2004, “Do 5-month-old infants see humans as material objects?Cognition, 94: 95–103. (Scholar)
  • Kuhlmeier, V.A., K. Wynn, & P. Bloom, 2003, “Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds,” Psychological Science, 14: 402–408. (Scholar)
  • Kuhn, T., 1962/1996, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edition, Chicago: University Of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Laurence, S. & E. Margolis, 2007, “Linguistic Determinism and the Innate Basis of Number,” in P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich, 2007, 139–169. (Scholar)
  • Leibniz, G.W., 1981/1764, New Essays on Human Understanding. Translated by Peter Remnant and Jonathan Bennett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Leslie, A. M., C. R. Gallistel, & R. Gelman, 2007, “Where integers come from,” in P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, S. Stich, 2007, 109–138. (Scholar)
  • Lipton, J.S. & E. Spelke, 2003, “Origins of number sense: Large number discrimination in human infants,” Psychological Science, 15(5): 396–401. (Scholar)
  • Locke, J. & P. H. Nidditch, 1979/1690, An essay concerning human understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • Luo, Y., 2011, “Three-month-old infants attribute goals to a non-human agent,” Developmental Science, 14(2): 453–460. (Scholar)
  • Luo, Y. & R. Baillargeon, 2005, “Can a self-propelled box have a goal? Psychological reasoning in 5-month-old infants,” Psychological Science, 16: 601–608. (Scholar)
  • Luo, Y. & S. C. Johnson, 2009, “Recognizing the role of perception in action at 6 months,” Developmental Science, 12: 142–149. (Scholar)
  • Markman, E., 1989, Naming and Categorization in Children. MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Marler, P., 1991, “The instinct to learn” in Carey, S. & Gelman, S. eds., The Epigenesis of Mind: Essays in Biology and Cognition, pp.305–330. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. (Scholar)
  • McCrink, K. & K. Wynn, 2004a, “Large-number addition and subtraction by 9-month old infants,” Psychological Science, 15(11): 776–781. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004b, “Ratio abstraction by 6-month-old infants,” Paper presented at the International Conference on Infant Studies, Chicago. (Scholar)
  • McGilvary, J. A., 2005, “Introduction” in J. A. McGilvray (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky, pp. 1–18. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Meltzoff, A.N., 1988, “Infant imitation after a 1-week delay: Long-term memory for novel acts and multiple stimuli,” Developmental Psychology, 24(4): 470–476. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005, “Imitation and other minds: The “like me” hypothesis,” in S. Hurley & N. Chater (eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol.2, pp. 55–77). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Meltzoff, A.N. & M. K. Moore, 1977, “Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates,” Science, 198: 75–78. (Scholar)
  • Menn, L. & M. M. Vihman, et al., 2003, “Acquisition of Language”, International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. William J. Frawley. 1992, 2003 Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Mikhail, J., 2008, “The Poverty of the Moral Stimulus” in Moral Psychology, Vol. 1: The Evolution of Morality: Innateness and Adaptation, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, ed., pp. 353–360, Cambridge: MIT Press) (Scholar)
  • Nagel, T., 1997, The last word. New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Newell, A., & H. A. Simon, 1976, “Computer science as empirical inquiry—Symbols and search,” Communications of the ACM, 19(3): 113–126. (Scholar)
  • Onishi, K. H., & R. Baillargeon, 2005, “Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs?” Science, 308: 255–258. (Scholar)
  • Piaget, J., 1928, The Child's Conception of the World. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1936/1952, The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York: International University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1954, The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1977, H. E. Gruber & J. J. Voneche (eds.), The essential Piaget. New York.
  • Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (ed.), 1980, Language and learning: the debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Pinker, S., 2002, The blank slate: the modern denial of human nature. New York: Viking. (Scholar)
  • Pinker, S. and P. Bloom, 1990, “Natural language and natural selection,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(4):707–784. (Scholar)
  • Pinker, S. and A. Prince, 1988, “On Language and Connectionism: Analysis of a Parallel Distributed Processing Model of Language Acquisition,” Cognition, 23: 73–193. (Scholar)
  • Plantinga, A., 1993, Warrant and proper function. New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Port, R. & T. van Gelder, 1995, Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. (Scholar)
  • Povinelli, D. J., 2000, Folk physics for apes. New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Premack, D. & G. Woodruff, 1978, “Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?Behavioral Brain Sciences, 1: 515–526. (Dennett's response is included in the issue.) (Scholar)
  • Putnam, H., 1967, “The ‘Innateness Hypothesis’ and explanatory models in linguistics,” Synthese, 17: 12–22. Reprinted in H. Putnam, 1975, Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, 107–16. (Scholar)
  • Pylyshyn, Z., 2007, “Multiple object tracking”, Scholarpedia, 2(10): 3326. [Available online]. (Scholar)
  • Quine, W. V., 1960, Word and object. [Cambridge]: Technology Press of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (Scholar)
  • Rao, R., B. Olshausen, & M. Lewicki, (eds.), 2002, Probabilistic Models of the Brain: Perception and Neural Function. MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Regolin, L., G. Vallortigara, & M. Zanforlin, 1995, “Object and spatial representations in detour problems by chicks,” Animal Behavior, 49: 195–199. (Scholar)
  • Regolin, L., L. Tommasi, & G. Vallortigara, 2000, “Visual perception of biological motion in newly hatched chicks as revealed by an imprinting procedure,” Animal Cognition, 3: 53–60. (Scholar)
  • Robbins, P., 2010, “Modularity of Mind”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/modularity-mind/>. (Scholar)
  • Santos, L.R. & M. D. Hauser, 1999, “How monkeys see the eyes: Cotton-top tamarins' reaction to changes in visual attention and action,” Animal Cognition, 2: 131–139. (Scholar)
  • Scholl, B., 2005, “Innateness and (Bayesian) visual perception,” in Carruthers et al. 2005, pp. 34–52. (Scholar)
  • Simon, T., S. Hespos, & P. Rochat, 1995, “Do infants understand simple arithmetic? A replication of Wynn, 1992,” Cognitive Development, 10: 253–269. (Scholar)
  • Skinner, B. F., 1957, Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Scholar)
  • Spelke, E., 1998. “Nativism, Empiricism, and the origins of knowledge,” Infant Behavior & Development, 21(2): 181–200. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000, “Core knowledge,” American Psychologist, 55: 1233–43. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2003, “What makes us smart: core knowledge and natural language,” in D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow, (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language in Thought, Cambridge, MA., MIT Press, 277–311. (Scholar)
  • Spelke, E., K. Breilinger, J. Macomber, & K. Jacobsen, 1992, “Origins of knowledge,” Psychological Review, 99: 605–632. (Scholar)
  • Spelke, E. S., R. Kestenbaum, D. Simons, & D. Wein, 1995, “Spatiotemporal continuity, smoothness of motion and object identity in infancy,” The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13: 113–142. (Scholar)
  • Street, S., 2006, “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value.” Philosophical Studies 127:109–166. (Scholar)
  • Teglas, E. Vul, V. Girotto, M. Gonzalez, J. B. Tenenbaum, L. L. Bonatti, 2011, “Pure Reasoning in 12-Month-Old Infants as Probabilistic Inference,” Science, 332(6033): 1054–1059. (Scholar)
  • Tenenbaum, J.B., 1999, “Bayesian modeling of human concept learning,” Proceedings of the 1998 Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 11: 59–65. (Scholar)
  • –––, (ed.), 2006, “Special Issue: Probabilistic Models Of Cognition,” Trends in the Cognitive Sciences, 10(7): 287–291. (Scholar)
  • Tenenbaum, J.B., T. L. Griffiths, & C. Kemp, 2006, “Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning,” in Tenenbaum, ed., 2006, pp. 309–318 (Scholar)
  • Tenenbaum, J.B., C. Kemp, T. L. Griffiths, & N. D. Goodman, 2011, “How to grow a mind: statistics, structure, and abstraction,” Science, 331: 1279. (Scholar)
  • Thelen, E. & L. B. Smith, 1994, A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Tomasello, M., & J. Call, 1997, Primate cognition, Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Ullman, S., 1979, “The interpretation of structure from motion,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 203(1153): 405–426 (Scholar)
  • Wellman, H.M., D. Cross, & J. Watson, 2001. “Meta-analysis for theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief,” Child Development, 72(3): 655–84. (Scholar)
  • Wood, J.N., & E. Spelke, 2005, “Infants' enumeration of actions: Numerical discrimination and its signature limits,” Developmental Science, 8(2): 173–181. (Scholar)
  • Woodward, A.L., 1998, “Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach,” Cognition, 69(1): 1–34. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999. “Infants' ability to distinguish between purposeful and non-purposeful behaviors,” Infant Behavior and Development, 22: 145–160. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005, “The infant origins of intentional understanding,” in R. V. Kail (ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 33, pp. 229–262). Amsterdam: Elsevier. (Scholar)
  • Wynn, K., 1992, “Addition and subtraction by human infants,” Nature, 358: 749–750. (Scholar)
  • Xu, F., & E. S. Spelke, 2000, “Large number discrimination in 6-month old infants,” Cognition, 74(1): B1–B11. (Scholar)
  • Xu, F., 2007, “Rational statistical inference and cognitive development,” in Carruthers et al. 2007, pp. 199–215. (Scholar)

Generated Wed Apr 26 18:32:45 2017