Linked bibliography for the SEP article "The Historical Controversies Surrounding Innateness" by Jerry Samet

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Primary Sources

  • Aristotle, De Anima, in The Complete Works of Aristotle, J. Barnes (ed.), Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
  • Ayer, A.J., 1936, “The A Priori”, ch. 4 of Language Truth & Logic, London: Victor Gollancz Ltd, 1950. (Scholar)
  • Chomsky, N., 1965, Aspects of a Theory of Syntax, Cambridge: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1966, Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought, New York: Harper & Row. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1975, Reflections on Language, New York: Pantheon. (Scholar)
  • Descartes, R., 1641, “Meditations on First Philosophy,” in Haldane and Ross (eds.), The Philosophical Works of Descartes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1911. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1647, “Notes Directed Against a Certain Program”, in Haldane and Ross (eds.), The Philosophical Works of Descartes, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1911. (Scholar)
  • Hume, D., 1739, A Treatise of Human Nature, L.A. Selby-Bigge (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1748, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Beauchamp (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. (Scholar)
  • Kant, I. [TPa], Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770, D. Walford (ed. and trans.), in collaboration with R. Meerbote, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
  • ––– [TPb], Theoretical Philosophy after 1781, H. Allison and P. Heath (eds.), G.Hatfield, M. Friedman, H. Allison and P. Heath (trans.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • Kirk, G.S. & Raven, J.E., 1957, The Presocratic Philosophers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Kuhn, T.S., 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, esp. ch X. (Scholar)
  • Leibniz, G.W., 1704, New Essays on Human Understanding, P. Remnant and J. Bennett (trans. and eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1714, “Monadology”, in G.W. Leibniz: Philosophical Texts, R.S. Woolhouse and R. Francks (trans. and eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. (Scholar)
  • Locke, J., 1690, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, P.H. Nidditch (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975. (Scholar)
  • Plato, Meno, in The Collected Dialogues, Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns (eds.), Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961.
  • –––, Phaedo, in The Collected Dialogues, Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns (eds.), Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961.
  • Quine, W.V.O., 1951, “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” in From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)

Secondary Sources

  • Adams, R. M., 1975, “Where Do Our Ideas Come From? – Descartes vs. Locke,” in Stich (1975). (Scholar)
  • Beiser, F., 2002, German Idealism: The Struggle Against Subjectivism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Scholar)
  • Broughton, J. & Carriero, J. (eds.), 2010, A Companion to Descartes, Malden: Blackwell. (Scholar)
  • Callanan, J., 2013, “Kant on Nativism, Scepticism and Necessity,” Kantian Review, 18: 1–27. (Scholar)
  • De Pierris, G., 1987, “Kant and Innatis,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 68: 285–305. (Scholar)
  • De Rosa, R., 2004, “Locke’s Essay, Book I: The Question-Begging Status of the Anti-Nativist Arguments,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 69(1): 37–64. (Scholar)
  • Falkenstein, L., 1990, “Was Kant a Nativist?Journal of the History of Ideas, 51: 573–97. (Scholar)
  • Gorham, G., 2002, “Descartes on the Innateness of All Ideas,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 32(3): 355–88. (Scholar)
  • Harris, John, 1974, “Leibniz and Locke on Innate Ideas,” Ratio, 16: 226–42; reprinted in Locke on Human Understanding, I. C. Tipton (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977. (Scholar)
  • Jolley, N., 1987, Leibniz and Locke: A Study of the New Essays on Human Understanding, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987. (Analysis of Leibniz’s response to Locke, with attention to the connection between Leibnizian doctrines and modern discussions.) (Scholar)
  • Kemp Smith, N., 1999, Commentary to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, New York: Humanity Books. (Scholar)
  • Kitcher, P., 1990, Kant’s Transcendental Psychology, Oxford: Oxford University Press (Scholar)
  • Nelson, A., 2010, “Cartesian Innateness,” in Broughton & Carriero 2010, pp. 319–333. (Scholar)
  • Newman, L. (ed.), 2007, The Cambridge Companion to Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Rickless, S.C., 2007, “Locke’s Polemic Against Nativism,” in Newman 2007, pp. 33–66. (Scholar)
  • Schmaltz, T., 1997, “Descartes on Innate Ideas, Sensation, and Scholasticism: The Response to Regius,” in Stewart 1997, pp. 33–74. (Scholar)
  • Scott, D., 1995, Recollection and Experience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (An analysis of Plato’s doctrine of recollection; also traces the development of the innateness doctrine in the ancient world, and compares the ancient sources to the positions taken in the modern period.) (Scholar)
  • Stewart, M. A., 1997, Studies in Seventeenth-Century European Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • Stich, S. (ed.), 1975, Innate Ideas, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Includes relevant sections of Plato’s Meno, the Locke-Leibniz debate, and Adams’ interpretive paper on the modern debate on innateness; see below. The papers in the last section represent the first wave of philosophical responses to the Chomskyan Nativist program in linguistics.) (Scholar)
  • Vanzo, A., 2018, “Leibniz on Innate Ideas and Kant on the Origin of the Categories,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 100(1): 19–45. (Scholar)
  • Wall, G., 1974, “Locke’s Attack on Innate Knowledge,” Philosophy, 49: 414–19; reprinted in Locke on Human Understanding, I. C. Tipton (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977. (Scholar)
  • Wendler, D., 1996, “Locke’s Acceptance of Innate Concepts,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74(3): 467–483. (Scholar)
  • Winkler, K., 1993, “Grades of Cartesian Innateness,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 1: 23–44. (Scholar)
  • Zoeller, G., 1989, “From Innate to ‘A Priori’: Kant’s Radical Transformation of a Cartesian-Leibnizian Legacy,” The Monist (Kant’s Critical Philosophy), 72(2): 222–235. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Jan 23 20:31:55 2022