Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Intellectual Property" by Adam Moore and Ken Himma

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

  • Barlow, John Perry, 1997, “The Economy of Ideas: Everything You Know about Intellectual Property is Wrong,” in Intellectual Property: Moral, Legal, and International Dilemmas, A. Moore (ed.), Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, p. 359. (Scholar)
  • Barro, Robert, Sala-I_Martin, Xavier, 1997, “Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth,” The Journal of Economic Growth, 2: 1-26. (Scholar)
  • Becker, L., 1993, “Deserving to Own Intellectual Property,” The Chicago-Kent Law Review, 68: 609–629. (Scholar)
  • Boldrin, Michael, Levine, David, 2007, Against Intellectual Monopoly, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Boyle, James, 1997, Shamans, Software, and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Bugbee, B., 1967, Genesis of American Patent and Copyright Law, Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press. (Scholar)
  • Calandrillo, Steve P., 1998, “An Economic Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights: Justifications and Problems of Exclusive Rights, Incentives to Generate Information, and the Alternative of a Government-Run Reward System,” Fordham Intellectual Property, Media, & Entertainment Law Journal, 9: 301-360. (Scholar)
  • Child, James W., 1990, “The Moral Foundations of Intangible Property,” The Monist 73: 578–600. Reprinted in Intellectual Property: Moral, Legal, and International Dilemmas, A. Moore (ed.), Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1997. (Scholar)
  • Claeys, Eric, 2017, “Labor, Exclusion, and Flourishing in Property Law” North Carolina Law Review, 95: 413-92. (Scholar)
  • Coy, W. (2007). “On Sharing Intellectual Properties in Global Communities,” in J. Fruhbauer, R. Capurro, and T. Hassmanninger (eds.), Localizing the Internet: Ethics Issues in Intercultural Perspective, Munich: Fink Verlag; originally presented as a lecture at the 2004 International ICIE Symposium, Karlsruhe, Germany. (Scholar)
  • Croskery, Patrick, 1993, “Institutional Utilitarianism and Intellectual Property,” The Chicago-Kent Law Review, 68: 631–657. (Scholar)
  • Epstein, M., 1992, Epstein on Intellectual Property, 5th edition, New York: Aspen Publishers. (Scholar)
  • Fisher, William, 2001, “Intellectual Property and Innovation: Theoretical, Empirical, and Historical Perspectives,” in New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property, S. Munzer (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Gordon, Wendy J., 1993, “Property Right in Self Expression: Equality and Individualism in the Natural Law of Intellectual Property,” Yale Law Journal, 102: 1533–1609. (Scholar)
  • Grant, Ruth, 1987, John Locke’s Liberalism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Hegel, G.W.F., 1821, Elements of the Philosophy of Right, Allen Wood (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. (Scholar)
  • Hettinger, Edwin C., 1989, “Justifying Intellectual Property,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 18: 31–52. Reprinted in Intellectual Property: Moral, Legal, and International Dilemmas, A. Moore (ed.), Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1997. (Scholar)
  • Himma, Ken, 2013, “The Legitimacy of Protecting Intellectual Property Rights: The Irrelevance of Two Conceptions of an Information Commons,” Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 11: 210-232. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2008, “The Justification of Intellectual Property Rights: Contemporary Philosophical Disputes” (Perspectives on Global Information Ethics), Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59: 2–30. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2006, “Justifying Intellectual Property Protection: Why the Interests of Content-Creators Usually Wins Over Everyone Else’s,” in Information Technology and Social Justice, Emma Rooksby (ed.), Hershey, PA: Information Science Pub. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005a, “Abundance, Rights, and Interests: Thinking about the Legitimacy of Intellectual Property,” in Philip Brey, Francis Grodzinsky, and Lucas Introna (eds.), Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference of Computer Ethics – Philosophical Enquiry (CEPE 2005); [available online] (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005b, “Information and Intellectual Property Protection: Evaluating the Claim that Information Should be Free,” APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Law, 4: 3–9. (Scholar)
  • Hughes, Justin, 1988, “The Philosophy Of Intellectual Property,” Georgetown Law Journal, 77: 287–366; reprinted in Intellectual Property: Moral, Legal, and International Dilemmas, A. Moore (ed.), Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
  • Humboldt, Wilhelm von, 1792, The Limits of State Action, J. Coulthard (trans.), J. W. Burrow (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969. First published in 1792. (Scholar)
  • Kohler, Josef, 1969, Philosophy of Law, Adalbert Albrecht (trans.). New York: A. M. Kelley. (Scholar)
  • Kuflik, Arthur, 1989, “The Moral Foundations of Intellectual Property Rights,” in V. Weil and J. Snapper (eds.), Owning Scientific and Technical Information, New Brunswick and London: Rutgers University Press. (Scholar)
  • Lemley, Mark, 2015, “Faith-Based Intellectual Property,” UCLA Law Review, 62: 1328-1346. (Scholar)
  • Lessig, L., 2004, Free Culture, New York: The Penguin Press. (Scholar)
  • Locke, John, 1690, The Second Treatise of Government, Peter Laslett (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. (Scholar)
  • Long, Clarisa, 2000, “Patents and Cumulative Innovation,” Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, 2: 229–246. (Scholar)
  • Machlup, F., 1962, Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
  • Mack, Eric, 1990, “Self-Ownership and the Right of Property,” The Monist, 73: 519–543. (Scholar)
  • Mackaay, Ejan, 1990, “Economic Incentives in Markets for Information and Innovation,” The Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 12: 867–909. (Scholar)
  • Merges, Robert, 2011, Justifying Intellectual Property, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Miners, Roger, and Staff, Robert, 1990, “Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks: Property or Monopoly,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 13: 911-947. (Scholar)
  • Moore, Adam D., forthcoming, “Intellectual Property and the Prisoner’s Dilemma: A Game Theory Justification of Copyrights, Patents, and Trade Secrets, ” Fordham Intellectual Property, Media, and Entertainment Law Journal. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2012. “A Lockean Theory of Intellectual Property Revisited,” San Diego Law Review, 49: 1069-1104. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2008, “Personality-Based, Rule-Utilitarian, and Lockean Justifications of Intellectual Property,” in H. Tavani and K. Himma (eds.), Information and Computer Ethics, Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, 105–130. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2003, “Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Social Progress: The Case against Incentives Based Arguments,” The Hamline Law Review, 26: 602–630. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2001, Intellectual Property and Information Control: Philosophic Foundations and Contemporary Issues, New Brunswick NJ: Transaction Publishing; second printing, 2009. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1998a, “A Lockean Theory of Intellectual Property,” The Hamline Law Review, 21: 65–108. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1998b, “Intangible Property: Privacy, Power, and Information Control,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 35: 365–378. (Scholar)
  • Moser, Petra, 2013, “Patents and Innovation: Evidence from Economic History, ” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27: 23-44. (Scholar)
  • Mossoff, Adam, 2012, “Saving Locke from Marx: The Labor Theory of Value in Intellectual Property Theory,”Social Philosophy & Policy, 29(2): 283-317. (Scholar)
  • Nimmer, M., 1970, “Does Copyright Abridge the First Amendment Guarantees of Free Speech and Press?” UCLA Law Review, 17: 1180–1204. (Scholar)
  • Nozick, Robert, 1974, Anarchy, State, and Utopia, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
  • O’Connor, Sean, 2015, “Creators, Innovators, and Appropriation Mechanisms,” George Mason Law Review, 22: 973-1000. (Scholar)
  • Oppenheim, C., 1951, “An Approach to Evaluation of the American Patent System,” Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 33: 555–568. (Scholar)
  • Palmer, Tom G., 2005, “Are Patents and Copyrights Morally Justified? The Philosophy of Property Rights and Ideal Objects,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 13 (1990): 817–866. Reprinted in Information Ethics: Privacy, Property, and Power, A. Moore (ed.), Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2005. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1989, “Intellectual Property: A Non-Posnerian Law and Economics Approach,” Hamline Law Review, 12: 261–304 (Scholar)
  • Perry, Geriant., 1978, John Locke, London: Allen & Unwin. (Scholar)
  • Polanyi, M., 1943, “Patent Reform,” Review of Economic Studies, 11: 61-76. (Scholar)
  • Priest, G., 1986, “What Economists can Tell Lawyers about Intellectual Property,” Research in Law and Economics: The Economics of Patents and Copyrights, 8: 19-24 (Scholar)
  • Proudhon, P.J., 1840, What is Property? An Inquiry into the Principles of Right and of Government, D. Kelly and B. Smith (trans). New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994. (Scholar)
  • Roeder, M., 1940, “The Doctrine of Moral Right: A Study in the Law of Artists, Authors and Creators,” Harvard Law Review, 53: 554–578. (Scholar)
  • Schroeder, Jeanne L., 2006, “Unnatural Rights: Hegel and Intellectual Property,” University of Miami Law Review, 60: 453-503. (Scholar)
  • Schmidtz, David, 1990, “When Is Original Appropriation Required?The Monist, 73: 504–18. (Scholar)
  • Shapiro, Ian, 1991, “Resources, Capacities, and Ownership: The Workmanship Ideal and Distributive Justice,” Political Theory, 19: 47–72. (Scholar)
  • Shavell, Steven and Tanguy Van Ypersele, 2001, “Rewards versus Intellectual Property Rights,” Journal of Law and Economics, 44: 525–547. (Scholar)
  • Simmons, A. John, 1992, The Lockean Theory of Rights, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
  • Smith, Michael, and Telang, Rahul, 2016, Streaming, Sharing, Stealing: Big Data and the Future of Entertainment, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Spooner, Lysander, 1855, The Law of Intellectual Property, Weston, Mass: M & S Press, 1971. (Scholar)
  • Stallman, Richard, 1997, “Why Software Should be Free,” in Intellectual Property: Moral, Legal, and International Dilemmas, A. Moore (ed.), Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
  • Waldron, Jeremy, 1983. “Two Worries about Mixing One’s Labour,” Philosophical Quarterly, 33: 37–44. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1993, “From Authors To Copiers: Individual Rights and Social Values In Intellectual Property,” Chicago-Kent Law Review, 68: 841–887. (Scholar)
  • Wright, Brian, 1998, “The Economics of Invention Incentives: Patents, Prizes, and Research Contracts,” American Economic Review, 73: 691–707. (Scholar)

Generated Sun May 15 19:49:53 2022