Modern Editions of James’ Works

• Abbreviatio in I Sententiarum Aegidii Romani, dist. 36. Edited by P. Giustiniani, Analecta Augustiniana, 42 (1979): 325–338.
• De episcopali officio. Edited by C. Scanzillo in “Il De episcopali officio del codice 793 O. di Montecassino.” Asprenas (1968):158–79. (Scholar)
• De regimine christiano. A Critical Edition and Translation by R.W. Dyson, Leiden: Brill, 2009. Replaces Arquillière’s edition (see below for complete reference), as well as Dyson’s earlier translation in James of Viterbo, On Christian Government (De regimine christiano). Edited and Translated by R.W. Dyson, Woodbridge: The Boydell Press, 1995. (Scholar)
• Disputationes de quolibet. Edited by E. Ypma, Würzburg: Augustinus Verlag, vols. I-III, and V, 1968–75.
• Quaestiones de divinis praedicamentis,
  qq. I-X and XI-XVII. Edited by E. Ypma (Corpus Scriptorum Augustianorum, Vol. V, 1–2), Rome, Augustinianum, 1983, 1986;
  q. XVIII, Augustiniana, 38 (1988): 67–98;
  q. XIX, Augustiniana, 39 (1989): 154–185;
  q. XX, Augustiniana, 42 (1992): 351–378;
  q. XXI, Augustiniana, 44 (1994): 177–208;
  q. XXII, Augustiniana, 45 (1995): 299–318;
  q. XXIII, Augustiniana, 46 (1996): 147–76;
  q. XXIV, Augustiniana, 46 (1997): 339–369;
  q. XXV,  Augustiniana, 48 (1998): 131–163;
  q. XXVI, Augustiniana, 49 (1999): 323–336.
  (Fr. Ypma’s declining health and subsequent death in 2007 prevented him from completing the edition of the remaining Quaestiones.)
• Sermones diversarum rerum. Edition of two sermons by G. Tavolaro, in “Opus nature est opus Dei: Potestas regalis et potestas sacerdotalis nel pensiero di Giacomo da Viterbo,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen-Âge, 81, 91–92 and 93–98. (Scholar)
• Summa de peccatorum distinctione. Partially edited by D. Ambrasi, Asprenas, 6 (1959): 189–218.

Secondary Literature

• Ambrasi, D., 1959, “La Summa de peccatorum distinctione del B. Giacomo da Viterbo dal ms. VII G 101 della Biblioteca Nazionale di Napoli,” Asprenas, 6: 47–78, 189–218, 288–308. (Scholar)
• Anderson, D., 1995, “‘Dominus Ludovicus’ in the Sermons of Jacobus of Viterbo (Arch. S. Pietro D.213),” in Literature and Religion in the Later Middle Ages: Philological Studies in Honor of Siegfried Wenzel, R. Newhauser and J. A. Alford (eds.), Binghamton, N.Y.: Medieval & Renaissance Texts & Studies, pp. 275–295. (Scholar)
• Arquillière, F.-X., 1926, Le plus ancien traité de l’Église: Jacques de Viterbe ‘De regimine christiano’ (1301–1302), Étude des sources et édition critique, Paris: G. Beauchesne. (Scholar)
• Bataillon, L. J.,  1989, “Quelques utilisateurs des textes rares de Moerbeke (Philopon, tria Opuscula) et particulièrement Jacques de Viterbe,” in Guillaume de Moerbeke: Recueil d’études à l’occasion du 700^e anniversaire de sa mort (1286),  J. Brams et W. Vanhamel (eds.), Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 107–112. (Scholar)
• Beneš, J., 1927, “Valor possibilium apud S. Thomam, Henricum Gandavensem et B. Iacobum de Viterbio,” Divus Thomas (Piacenza) 30: 333–55. (Scholar)
• Côté, A., 2009a, “Le progrès à l’infini des perfections créées selon Godefroid de Fontaines et Jacques de Viterbe,” in Actualité de l’infinité divine aux XIII^e et XIV^e siècles, D. Arbib (ed.) Les Études Philosophiques, 4: 505–530. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009b, “Simplicius and James of Viterbo on Propensities,” Vivarium, 47: 24–53. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, L’âme, l’intellect, et la volonté, Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin. Latin text of James of Viterbo’s Quod. I, q. 7 (partial), q. 12 (complete), and 13 (complete), with French Translation, Introduction, and notes.
• –––, 2012,“Le Quodlibet I, question 17 de Jacques de Viterbe: introduction, traduction et notes,” Augustiniana, 62: 45–76. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013,“La critique de la doctrine de l’abstraction de Jacques de Viterbe,” Medioevo 38: 33–61. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016, “Bernard of Auvergne on James of Viterbo’s Doctrine of Possibles: With a Critical Edition of Bernard’s Reprobatio of James’s Quodlibet 1, Question 5, ” Augustiniana, 66: 151–184. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018, “James of Viterbo on Divine Ideas and the Divine Cognition of Creatures” in A. Côté & M. Pickavé (eds.), pp. 70–96. (Scholar)
• –––, 2019, “Maino de Maineri (ca. 1290–ca.1368) on Whether Something Can Come to Be Out of Nothing: Questiones de substantia orbis: questio utrum ex nihilo possit aliquid fieri,” Mediaeval Studies, 81: 2–76. (Scholar)
• Côté, A., & Pickavé, M. (eds.), 2018, A Companion to James of Viterbo, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
• Dumont, S., 2018a,“James of Viterbo on the Will,” in A. Côté & M. Pickavé (eds.), pp. 249–305. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018b,“The Authorship of the Quaestiones septem de Verbo Attributed to James of Viterbo,” in A. Côté & M. Pickavé (eds.), pp. 356–375. (Scholar)
• Fidel Casado, P., 1951–3, “El pensamiento filosófico del Beato Santiago de Viterbo,” La Ciudad de Dios, 163 (1951): 437–454; 164 (1952): 301–331; 165 (1953): 103–144, 283–302, 489–500. (Scholar)
• –––, 1967, “Quaestiones de quolibet de Santiago de Viterbo (Quodlibeto I, q. 12),” Archivo Teológico Agustiniano, 2: 109–130. (Scholar)
• Giustiniani, P., 1979, “Il problema delle idee in Dio secondo Giacomo da Viterbo OESA, con edizione della Distinzione 36 dell’Abbreviato in I Sententiarum Aegidii Romani,” Analecta Augustiniana, 42: 288–342. (Scholar)
• –––, 1980, “La teologia studiata secondo le 4 cause aristoteliche in un’opera inedita di Giacomo da Viterbo,” Asprenas, 27: 161–188. (Scholar)
• Giustiniani, P., Tavolaro, G. (eds.), 2011, Giacomo da Viterbo al tempo di Bonifacio VIII: Studi per il VII centenario della morte in onore di S.E. Rev.ma Mons. Lorenzo Chiarinelli Vescovo emerito di Viterbo, Rome: Centro Culturale Agostiniano. (Scholar)
• Gossiaux, M. D., 1999, “James of Viterbo on the Relationship between Essence and Existence,” Augustiniana, 49: 73–107. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “James of Viterbo and the Late Thirteenth-Century Debate Concerning the Reality of the Possibles,” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales, 74 (2): 483–522. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018, “James of Viterbo on Metaphysics” in A. Côté & M. Pickavé (eds.), pp. 33–69. (Scholar)
• Grabmann, M., 1936, “Die Lehre des Jakob von Viterbo (1308) von der Wirklichkeit des göttlichen Seins (Beitrag zum Streit über das Sein Gottes zur Zeit Meister Eckharts),” Mittelalterliches Geistesleben. Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Scholastik und Mystik, vol. 2, Max Hueber Verlag, Munich: 490–511. (Scholar)
• Gutiérrez, P. D., 1939, De B. Iacobi Viterbiensis O.E.S.A. Vita, Operibus et Doctrina Theologica, Rome: Analecta Augustiniana. (Scholar)
• Henninger, M., 1989, Relations: Medieval Theories 1250–1325, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018, “James of Viterbo on the Ontological Status of Real Relations,” in A. Côté & M. Pickavé (eds.), pp. 97–126. (Scholar)
• Jeschke, T., 2009, “Über natürliche und übernatürliche Gottesliebe. Durandus und einige Dominikaner gegen Jakob von Viterbo (mit einer Textedition von In III Sententiarum, D. 29, Q. 2 des Petrus de Palude),” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévale, 76 (1): 111–198. (Scholar)
• Kempshall, M. S., 1999, “The Common Good in Late Medieval Political Thought,” Oxford: Clarendon Press, ch. 10. (Scholar)
• Kent, B., 2001, “Justice, Passion, and Another’s Good: Aristotle among the Theologians,” in Nach der Verurteilung von 1277. Philosophie und Theologie an der Universität von Paris im letzten Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts. Studien und Texte—After the Condemnation of 1277. Philosophy and Theology at the University of Paris in the Last Quarter of the Thirteenth Century. Studies and Texts, Miscellanea Mediaevalia, 28, J. Aertsen, K. Emery, Jr., A. Speer (eds.), Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 704–718. (Scholar)
• Libera, A. de, 1994, “D’Avicenne à Averroès, et retour. Sur les sources arabes de la théorie scolastique de l’un transcendental,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 4: 141–179.
• Mahoney, E. P., 1973, “Themistius and the Agent Intellect in James of Viterbo and other Thirteenth Century Philosophers (Saint Thomas, Siger of Brabant and Henry Bate),” Augustiniana, 23: 422–467. (Scholar)
• –––, 1980, “Metaphysical Foundations of the Hierarchy of Being according to Some Late Medieval Philosophers,” in Philosophies of Existence: Ancient and Medieval, P. Morewedge (ed.), New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 165–257. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995, “Duns Scotus and Medieval Discussions of Metaphysical Hierarchy: the Background of Scotus’ ‘Essential Order’ in Henry of Ghent, Godfrey of Fontaines and James of Viterbo,” in Via Scoti. Methodologica ad mentem Joannis Duns Scoti. Atti del Congresso scotistico internazionale, Roma, 9–11 marzo 1993, vol. I, L. Sileo (ed.), Rome: PAA-Edizioni Antonianum, pp. 359–374. (Scholar)
• Maier, A., 1943, An der Grenze von Scholastik und Naturwissenschaft. Studien zur Naturphilosophie des 14. Jahrhunderts, Essen: Essener Verlagsanstalt, pp. 367–368. (Scholar)
• Osborne, T. M., 1999, “James of Viterbo’s Rejection of Giles of Rome’s Arguments for the Natural Love of God over Self,” Augustiniana, 49: 235–249. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, Love of Self and Love of God in Thirteenth-Century Ethics, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. (Scholar)
• Pattin, A, 1962, “La structure de l’être fini selon Bernard d’Auvergne, O.P. (après 1307),” Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 4: 668–737. (Scholar)
• Phelps, M., 1980, “The Theory of Seminal Reasons in James of Viterbo,” Augustiniana, 30: 271–283. (Scholar)
• Pickavé, M., 2007, “The Controversy over the Principle of Individuation in Quodlibeta (1277–ca. 1320): A Forest Map,” in Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages. The Fourteenth Century, C. Schabel (ed.) Leiden: Brill, pp. 17–79. (Scholar)
• Pickavé, M. and Côté, A., 2018, “James of Viterbo’s Philosophy of Nature,”in Côté, A., & Pickavé, M. (eds.), 2018, pp.127–167. (Scholar)
• Ruello, F., 1970, “L’analogie de l’être selon Jacques de Viterbe, Quodlibet I, Quaestio I,” Augustiniana, 20: 145–180.
• –––, 1974–5, “Les fondements de la liberté humaine selon Jacques de Viterbe, Disputatio prima de Quolibet, q. VII (1293),” Augustiniana, 24: 283–347; 25: 114–142. (Scholar)
• Rüssmann, H., 1938, Zur Ideenlehre der Hochscholastik, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Heinrich von Gent, Gottfried von Fontaines un Jakob von Viterbo, Freiburg: Herder. (Scholar)
• Scanzillo, C., 1972, “Jacobus de Viterbio OSA: La ‘Prima quaestio disputata de Verbo’ del codice A. 971 delle Biblioteca dell’Archiginnasio di Bologna. Edizione e note,” Asprenas, 19: 25–61. (Scholar)
• Schönberger, R., 1986, Die Transformation des klassischen Seinsverständnisses. Studien zur Vorgeschichte des neuzeitlichen Seinsbegriffs im Mittelalter, Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie, 21, Berlin-New York, De Gruyter. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994, Relation als Vergleich. Die Relationstheorie des Johannes Buridan im Kontext seines Denkens und der Scholastik, Leiden: Brill, pp. 132–142. (Scholar)
• Solère, J.-L., 2018a, “James of Viterbo’s Innatist Theory of Cognition,” in A. Côté & M. Pickavé (eds.), 2018, pp. 168–217. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018b, “Intellect and Intellectual Cognition According to James of Viterbo,” in A. Côté & M. Pickavé (eds.), 2018, pp. 218–248. (Scholar)
• Spruit, L., 1994, Species Intelligibilis: From Perception to Knowledge, vol. 1, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
• Tavolaro, G., 2014, “Opus nature est opus Dei: Potestas regalis et potestas sacerdotalis nel pensiero di Giacomo da Viterbo,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen-Âge, 81: 39–98. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018, “The So-Called Abbreviatio in I Sententiarum Aegidii Romani of James of Viterbo: A New Hypothesis,” in A. Côté & M. Pickavé (eds.), 2018, pp. 376–392. (Scholar)
• Wéber, E., 1981, “Eckhart et l’ontothéologisme : histoire et conditions d’une rupture,” in Maître Eckhart à Paris. Une critique médiévale de l’ontothéologie. Les Questions parisiennes n° 1 et n° 2 d’Eckhart, Z. Kaluza, A. de Libera, P. Vignaux, E. Wéber, E. Zum Brunn (eds.), Paris: Presses universitaires de France, pp. 21–54. (Scholar)
• Wippel, J. F., 1974, “The Dating of James of Viterbo’s Quodlibet I and Godfrey of Fontaine’s Quodlibet VIII,” Augustiniana, 24: 348–386. (Scholar)
• –––, 1981, “James of Viterbo on the Essence-Existence Relationship (Quodlibet 1, Q. 4), and Godfrey of Fontaines on the Relationship between Nature and Supposit (Quodlibet 7, Q. 5),” in Sprache und Kenntnis im Mittelalter (Miscellanea Mediaevalia, 13), Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 777–787. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994, “James of Viterbo (b. ca. 1255; d. 1308),” in Individuation in Scholasticism: The Later Middle Ages and the Counter-Reformation, 1150–1650, J.J.E. Gracia (ed.), Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 257–269. (Scholar)
• Ypma, E., 1974, “Recherches sur la carrière scolaire et la bibliothèque de Jacques de Viterbe,” Augustiniana, 24: 247–282. (Scholar)
• –––, 1975, “Recherches sur la productivité littéraire de Jacques de Viterbe jusqu’à 1300,” Augustiniana, 25: 223–282. (Scholar)
• –––, 1980, “La méthode de travail de Jacques de Viterbe. L’analyse d’une question,” Augustiniana, 30: 254–270. (Scholar)
• –––, 1980, “A propos d’un exposé sur Jacques de Viterbe,” Augustiniana, 30: 43–45.
• –––, 1985, “Jacques de Viterbe, témoin valable?,” Recherches de Théologie ancienne et médiévale, 52: 232–234. (Scholar)
• –––, 1987, “Jacques de Viterbe, lecteur attentif de Gilbert de la Porrée,” Recherches de Théologie ancienne et médiévale, 54: 257–261. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991, “La relation est-elle un être réel ou seulement un être de raison d’après Jacques de Viterbe,” in Lectionum Varietates: Hommage à Paul Vignaux (1904–1987), J. Jolivet (ed.), Paris: J. Vrin, pp. 155–162. (Scholar)
• Zumkeller, A., 1951, “De doctrina sociali scholae Augustininae aevi medii,” Analecta Augustiniana, 22: 57–84. (Scholar)
• –––, 1964, “Die Augustinerschule des Mittelalters: Vertreter und Philosophisch-Theologische Lehre,”Analecta Augustiniana, 27: 167–262. (Scholar)