Internal references to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason contain page numbers from both the A (1781) and B (1787) German editions. All other internal references to Kant’s writings are cited using the relevant volume and page number from the standard “Akademie” edition of Kant’s works: Kants Gesammelte Schriften, edited by the Königlich Preussischen (now Deutschen) Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin: G. Reimer [now de Gruyter], 1902–).

• Abela, P., 2002, Kant’s Empirical Realism, Oxford: Clarendon/Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Allais, L., 2009, “Non-Conceptual Content and the Representation of Space,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 47: 383–413. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015, Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and His Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016, “ Conceptualism and Nonconceptualism in Kant: A Survey of the Recent Debate,” in D. Schulting (ed.), Kantian Nonconceptualism, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–25. (Scholar)
• Anderson, R.L., 2001, “Synthesis, Cognitive Normativity, and the Meaning of Kant’s Question ‘How are synthetic cognitions a priori possible’” European Journal of Philosophy, 9: 275–305. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “It Adds Up After All: Kant’s Philosophy of Arithmetic in Light of the Traditional Logic,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 69: 501–540. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, “The Wolffian Paradigm and its Discontents: Kant’s Containment Definition of Analyticity in Historical Context,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 87: 22–74. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015, The Poverty of Conceptual Truth: Kant’s Analytic/Synthetic Distinction and the Limits of Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Arnaud, A. & Nicole, P. N., 1996, Logic or the Art of Thinking, Trans. J.V. Buroker, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Bauer, N., 2012, “A Peculiar Intuition: Kant’s Conceptualist Account of Perception,” Inquiry, 55: 215–237. (Scholar)
• Bell, D., 1979, Frege’s Theory of Judgement, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, D., 1987, “The Art of Judgement,” Mind, 96: 221–244. (Scholar)
• Benacerraf, P., 1965, “What Numbers Could Not Be,”Philosophical Review, 74: 47–73. (Scholar)
• –––, 1981, “Frege: the Last Logicist,” in P. French, et al (eds.), The Foundations of Analytic Philosophy, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 17–35. (Scholar)
• Bermúdez, J., 2003, Thinking without Words, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Bermúdez, J. & Cahen, A., 2015, “Nonconceptual Mental Content,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/content-nonconceptual/>. (Scholar)
• Bolzano, B., 1972, Theory of Science, trans. R. George, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Scholar)
• BonJour, L., 1998, In Defense of Pure Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Boole, G., 1854, An Investigation of the Laws of Thought, Cambridge: Macmillan. (Scholar)
• Boolos, G., 1998, Logic, Logic, and Logic, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Boolos, G., and Jeffrey, R., 1989, Computability and Logic, 3^rd edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Bowman, B., 2011, “A Conceptualist Reply to Hanna’s Kantian Non-Conceptualism,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 19: 417–446. (Scholar)
• Brandt, R., 1995, The Table of Judgments: Critique of Pure Reason A67–76; B92–101, trans. E. Watkins, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview. (Scholar)
• Breitenbach, A., 2015, “Beauty in Proofs: Kant on Aesthetics in Mathematics,” European Journal of Philosophy, 23: 955–977. (Scholar)
• Chignell, A., 2007a, “Belief in Kant,” Philosophical Review, 116: 323–360. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007b, “Kant’s Concepts of Justification,” Noûs, 41: 33–63. (Scholar)
• Chomsky, N., 1975, Reflections on Language, New York: Pantheon. (Scholar)
• Cook, V., and Newson, M., 1996, Chomsky’s Universal Grammar: An Introduction, 2^nd edn., Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Denyer, N., 1992, “Pure Second-Order Logic,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 33: 220–224. (Scholar)
• Frege, G., 1953, Foundations of Arithmetic, trans. J.L. Austin, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1972, Conceptual Notation and Related Articles, trans. T.W. Bynum, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1979, “Logic (1897),”, inn G. FregeFrege: Posthumous Writings, trans. P. Long et al., Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 127–151. (Scholar)
• –––, 1984, “Thoughts,”, in G. Frege, Frege: Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, trans. M. Black, et al., Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 351–372. (Scholar)
• Friedman, M., 1992, Kant and the Exact Sciences, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Gardner, S., 2013, “Transcendental Philosophy and the Given,” in J. Schear (ed.), Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate, London: Routledge, pp. 110–142. (Scholar)
• Ginsborg, H., 2006, “Empirical Concepts and the Content of Experience,”, European Journal of Philosophy, 14: 349–372. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008, “Was Kant a Nonconceptualist?,”, Philosophical Studies, 137: 65–77. (Scholar)
• Golob, S., 2012, “Kant on Intentionality, Magnitude, and the Unity of Perception,” European Journal of Philosophy, 22: 505–528 (Scholar)
• –––, 2016, “Why the Transcendental Deduction Is Compatible With Nonconceptualism,” in D. Schulting (ed.), Kantian Nonconceptualism, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 27–52. (Scholar)
• –––, forthcoming, “Kant as Both Conceptualist and Nonconceptualist,” Kantian Review. (Scholar)
• Griffith, A., 2010, “Perception and the Categories: A Conceptualist Reading of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason,” European Journal of Philosophy, 20: 193–222. (Scholar)
• Grüne, S., 2009, Blinde Anschauung: Die Rolle von Begriffen in Kants Theorie sinnlicher Synthesis, Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “Is There a Gap in Kant’s B Deduction?,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 19: 465–490. (Scholar)
• Hanna, R., 2001, Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon/Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, “Kant and Nonconceptual Content,” European Journal of Philosophy, 13: 247–290. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006a, Rationality and Logic, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006b, Kant, Science, and Human Nature, Oxford: Clarendon/Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “Kant’s Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects, and the Gap in the B Deduction,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 19: 399–415. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Kant, Hegel, and the Fate of Non-Conceptual Content,” Hegel Society of Great Britain Bulletin, 65 (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, “Forward to Idealism: On Eckart Förster’s The Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy,” Kantian Review, 18(2): 301-315. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015, Cognition, Content, and the A Priori: A Study in the Philosophy of Mind and Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016a, “Directions in Space, Nonconceptual Form, and the Foundations of Transcendental Idealism,” in D. Schulting (ed.), Kantian Nonconceptualism, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 99–115. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016b, “Kantian Madness: Blind Intuitions, Essentially Rogue Objects, Nomological Deviance, and Categorial Anarchy,” Contemporary Studies in Kantian Philosophy, 1: 44–64. (Scholar)
• Hazen, A., 1999, “Logic and Analyticity,” in A.C. Varzi (ed.), The Nature of Logic, Stanford, CA: CSLI, pp. 79–110. (Scholar)
• Heidegger, M., 1990, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, trans. R. Taft, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
• Hylton, P., 1984, “The Nature of the Proposition and the Revolt against Idealism,” in R. Rorty (ed.), Philosophy in History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 375–397. (Scholar)
• Kain, P., 2010, “Practical Cognition, Intuition, and the Fact of Reason,” in B. Lipscomb and J. Krueger (eds.), Kant’s Moral Metaphysics: God, Freedom, and Immortality, Berlin: DeGruyter, pp. 211–230. (Scholar)
• Kitcher, P., 1990, Kant’s Transcendental Psychology, New York: Oxford. (Scholar)
• Laiho, H., 2012, Perception in Kant’s Model of Experience, PhD dissertation, Turku: University of Turku. (Scholar)
• Land, T., 2011, “Kantian Conceptualism,” in G. Abel et al. (eds.), Rethinking Epistemology, Berlin: DeGruyter, pp. 197–239. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015, “Nonconceptualist Readings of Kant and the Transcendental Deduction,”, Kantian Review, 20: 25–51. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016, “Moderate Conceptualism and Spatial Representation,” in D. Schulting (ed.), Kantian Nonconceptualism, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 145–170. (Scholar)
• Landy, D., 2009, “Inferentialism and the Transcendental Deduction,” Kantian Review, 14: 1–30. (Scholar)
• Leech, J., 2010, “Kant’s Modalities of Judgment,” European Journal of Philosophy, 20: 260–284. (Scholar)
• Linsky, L., 1992, “The Problem of the Unity of the Proposition,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 30: 243–273. (Scholar)
• Longuenesse, B., 1998, Kant and the Capacity to Judge, trans. C. Wolfe, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• MacFarlane, J., 2002, “Kant, Frege, and the Logic in Logicism,” Philosophical Review, 111: 25–65. (Scholar)
• Martin, W., 2006, Theories of Judgment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• McDowell, J., 1994, Mind and World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “Avoiding the Myth of the Given,” in J. McDowell, Having the World in View, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 256–272. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, “The Myth of the Mind as Detached,” in J. Schear (ed.), Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate, London: Routledge, pp. 41–58. (Scholar)
• McLear, C., 2011, “Kant on Animal Consciousness,” Philosophers' Imprint, 11: 1–16. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, “The Kantian (Non)Conceptualism Debate,” Philosophy Compass, 9: 769–790. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015, “Two Kinds of Unity in the Critique of Pure Reason,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 53: 79–110. (Scholar)
• Newton, A., 2015, “Kant on the Logical Origin of Concepts,” European Journal of Philosophy, 23: 456–484. (Scholar)
• Onof, C., 2016,“Is There Room For Nonconceptual Content in Kant’s Critical Philosophy?,” in D. Schulting (ed.), Kantian Nonconceptualism, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 199–226. (Scholar)
• Parsons, C., “Kant’s Philosophy of Arithmetic,” in C. Parsons, Mathematics in Philosophy, New York: Cornell University Press, pp. 110–149. (Scholar)
• Pasternack, L., 2011, “The Development and Scope of Kantian Belief: The Highest Good, The Practical Postulates, and the Fact of Reason,” Kant-Studien, 102: 290–315. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, “Kant on Opinion, Hypothesis, and the Norms of Applied Logic,” Kant-Studien, 105: 41–82. (Scholar)
• Pippin, R., 2013, “What is ‘Conceptual Activity’?,” in J. Schear (ed.), Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate, London: Routledge, pp. 91–109. (Scholar)
• Priest, G., 2001, An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Quine, W.V.O., 1961, “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” in W.V.O. Quine, From a Logical Point of View, 2nd edn., New York: Harper and Row, pp. 20–46. (Scholar)
• Reich, K., 1992, The Completeness of Kant’s Table of Judgments, trans. J. Kneller and M. Losonsky, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
• Rödl, S., 2006, “Logical Form as a Relation to the Object,” Philosophical Topics, 34: 345–369. (Scholar)
• Rohs, P., 2001, “Bezieht sich nach Kant die Anschauung unmittelbar auf Gegenstände?,” Akte des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, vol. II, Berlin: De Gruyter. (Scholar)
• Russell, B., 1966, “On the Nature of Truth and Falsehood,” in B. Russell, Philosophical Essays, London: Allen & Unwin, pp. 147–159. (Scholar)
• Schulting, D., 2012, “Kant, Non-Conceptual Content, and the ‘Second Step’ of the B Deduction,” Kant Studies Online, 51–92. (Scholar)
• Shabel, L., 2003, Mathematics in Kant’s Critical Philosophy, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, “Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics,” in P. Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant, 2nd edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Sellars, W., 1963, “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind,” in W. Sellars, Science, Perception, and Reality, New York: Humanities Press, pp. 127–196. (Scholar)
• –––, 1968, Science and Metaphysics: Variations on Kantian Themes, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
• Soboleva, M., forthcoming, “How We Read Kant: An Empiricist and a Transcendental Reading of Kant’s Theory of Experience,” Philosophia, first online 22 July 2017, doi:10.1007/s11406-017-9878-0 (Scholar)
• Stevenson, L., 2003, “Opinion, Belief or Faith, and Knowledge,” Kantian Review, 7: 72–101. (Scholar)
• Strawson, P.F., 1966, The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, London: Methuen. (Scholar)
• Thompson, M., 1972, “Singular Terms and Intuitions in Kant's Epistemology,” The Review of Metaphysics, 26(2): 314–343. (Scholar)
• Tolley, C., 2012, “The Generality of Kant’s Transcendental Logic,” Journal of the History of Philosophy. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, “The Non-Conceptuality of the Content of Intuitions: A New Approach,” Kantian Review, 18: 107–136. (Scholar)
• Van Cleve, J., 2012, “Defining and Defending Nonconceptual Contents and States,” Philosophical Perspectives, 26: 411–430. (Scholar)
• Von Humboldt, W., 1988, On Language, trans. P. Heath, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Waxman, W., 1991, Kant’s Model of the Mind, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Wenzel, C., 2005, “Spielen nach Kant die Kategorien schon bei der Wahrnehmung eine Rolle?,” Kant-Studien, 96: 407–426. (Scholar)
• Whitehead, A.N., and Russell, B., 1962, Principia Mathematica to *56, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Williams, J., 2012, “How Conceptually-Guided are Kantian Intuitions?,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 29: 57–78. (Scholar)
• Wittgenstein, L., 1922, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. C.K. Ogden, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
• –––, 1953, Philosophical Investigations, trans. G.E.M. Anscombe, New York: Macmillan. (Scholar)
• Wolff, M., 1995, Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel, Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann. (Scholar)