Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Leibniz's Influence on Kant" by Catherine Wilson

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Primary Sources

References to Leibniz’s texts are to C.I. Gerhardt, ed., Die Philosophische Schriften von Leibniz, 7 vols., Hildesheim: Olms, 1965; page references to the New Essays cited as “A” are to volume IV Reihe 6 of the still incomplete Academy edition of Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Sametliche Schriften und Briefe, ed. Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1923–. References to Ariew and Garber are to G.W. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays, tr. and ed. Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber, Indianapolis, Hackett, 1989. References to Kant’s texts follow the Academy edition (Gesammelte Schriften, ed., Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin: Reimer, de Gruyter, 1900–) by volume and page. References to the Critique of Pure Reason (KRV) are to the first (A) and second (B) edition. Where the current English translation, tr. and ed. by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, was directly cited, it is noted as CPR.

Secondary Sources

  • Allison, Henry (ed.), 1973, The Kant-Eberhard Controversy, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004, Kant’s Transcendental Idealism, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
  • Beck, Lewis White, 1969, Early German Philosophy: Kant and his Predecessors, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Butts, Robert, 1984, Kant and the Double Government Methodology, Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
  • Fonnesu, Luca, “The Problem of Theodicy,” in The Cambridge History of Eighteenth Century Philosophy, ed. Knud Haakonssen, Vol. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 749–778. (Scholar)
  • Friedman, Michael, 2013, Kant’s Construction of Nature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Guyer, Paul, 2011, “Kantian Communities,” in Charlton Payne and Lucas Thorpe (eds.), Kant and the Concept of Community, Rochester: University of Rochester Press. (Scholar)
  • Jauernig, Anja, 2008, “Kant’s Critique of the Leibnizian Philosophy: contra the Leibnizians, but pro Leibniz,” in Daniel Garber and Beatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 41–63. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011, “Kant, the Leibnizians and Leibniz,” in Brandon Look (ed.), The Continuumm Companion to Leibniz, London/New York: Thoemmes Continuum Press, pp. 289-309. (Scholar)
  • Laywine, Alison, 1993, Kant’s Early Metaphysics and the Origins of the Critical Philosophy, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview. (Scholar)
  • Look, Brandon C., 2013, “Matter, Inertia and the Contingency of the Laws of Nature in Leibniz and Kant--Some Points of Comparison,” in Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin and Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant und die Philosophie in Weltbuergerlicher Absicht: Akten des XI Kant-Kongresses 2010, Berlin: DeGruyter, pp. 147-158. (Scholar)
  • Marquand, Odo, 1981, Abschied von Prinzipiellen: Philosophische Studien, Stuttgart, Reclam. (Scholar)
  • Mittelstrass, Juergen, 1985, “Leibniz and Kant on Mathematical and Philosophical Knowledge,” in Kathleen Okruhlik and James Robert Brown (eds.), The Natural Philosophy of Leibniz, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 227–262 (Scholar)
  • Rateau, Paul, 2009, L’Idee de Theodicee de Leibniz a Kant. Heritage, Transformations, Critiques, Wiesbaden, Steiner.
  • Rescher, Nicholas, 2013, “Leibniz and the World’s Improvability,” in On Leibniz, Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press. (Scholar)
  • Rumore, Paula, 2016, “Mechanism and Materialism in early Modern German Philosophy,” in Varieties of early Modern Materialism, Falk Wunderlich and Patricia Springborg (eds.), British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 24(5): 917-39. (Scholar)
  • Rusnock, Paul and George, Rolf, 1995, “A Last Shot at Kant and Incongruent Counterparts,” Kant-Studien, 86: 257–277. (Scholar)
  • Schonrich, Gerhard, 1992, “Zahmung des Bosen? Uberlegungen zu Kant vor dem Hintergrund der Leibnizschen Theodizee,” Zeitschrift fuerphilosophische Forschung, 46: 205–223. (Scholar)
  • Tonelli, Giorgio, 1974, “Leibniz on Innate Ideas and the Early Reactions to the Publication of the Nouveaux Essais [1765],” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 12: 437–54. (Scholar)
  • Walker, R.C.S., 1971, “The Status of Kant’s Theory of Matter,” Synthese, 23: 121–6. (Scholar)
  • Wilson, Catherine, 1995, “The Reception of Leibniz in the Eighteenth century,” in The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz, Nicholas Jolley (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 442–474. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2014, “What was Kant’s Critical Philosophy Critical Of?” in Conflicting Values of Inquiry: Ideologies of Epistemology in Early Modern Europe, Tamas Demeter, Kathryn Murphy and Claus Zittel (eds.), Leiden: Brill, pp. 386-406. (Scholar)
  • Zoeller, Guenter, 1989, “From Innate to ‘A priori,’: Kant’s Radical Transformation of a Cartesian-Leibnizian Legacy,” Monist, 72: 222-235. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Feb 18 08:07:39 2018