Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Kant’s Critique of Metaphysics" by Michelle Grier

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Relevant Works by Kant (includes German editions and translations):

  • Critique of Practical Reason, 1956, trans. L. W. Beck, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
  • Critique of Pure Reason, 1929, trans. N. Kemp Smith, New York: St. Martin’s Press
  • Gesammelte Schriften, 1922, Koniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften edition, Berlin and Leipzig: de Gruyter
  • Kant: Philosophical Correspondence , 1759–99, 1970, ed. and trans. A. Zweig, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kritik der reinen Vernunft, 1954, ed. R. Schmidt, Hamburg: Felix Meiner
  • Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, trans. J. Ellington, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
  • Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, 1950, trans. L.W. Beck, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
  • Kant: Selected Pre-Critical Writings and Correspondence with Beck, 1968, trans. G. B. Kerferd and D. E. Walford, Manchester: Manchester University Press
  • Lectures on Philosophical Theology, 1978, trans. Allen Wood and Gertrude M. Clark, Ithaca: Cornell University Press
  • First Introdcution to the Critique of Judgment, 1965, trans. James haden, New York: Bobbs-Merrill Press
  • The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant: Lectures on Metaphysics, 1997, trans. and ed. Karl Ameriks and Steve Naragan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Lectures on Logic, 1992, trans. and ed. J. Michael Young, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant: The Critique of Pure Reason, 1998, trans. and ed. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Selected Secondary Readings on Topics in Kant’s Dialectic

  • Al-Azm, S., 1972, The Origins of Kant’s Argument in the Antinomies, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Ameriks, K., 1992, “The Critique of Metaphysics: Kant and Traditional Ontology,” in Cambridge Companion to Kant, ed. Paul Guyer, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2006, “The Critique of Metaphysics: The structure and Fate of Kant’s Dialectic,” in P. Guyer (ed.), Kant and Modern Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 269–302. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1982, Kant’s Theory of Mind, Oxford: Clarendon Press (Scholar)
  • Allison, H., 1983, Kant’s Transcendental Idealism, New Haven: Yale University Press (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004, Kant’s Transcendental Idealism, revised and expanded version, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
  • Bennett, J., 1974, Kant’s Dialectic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Bird, G., 2006, The Revolutionary Kant, Chicago: Open Court. (Scholar)
  • Bird, G. (ed.), 2006, A Companion to Kant, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
  • Buroker, J., 2006, Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: An Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Brandt, Reinhardt, 1989, “The Deductions in the Critique of Judgment: Comments on Hampshire and Horstmann,” in Kant’s Transcendental Deductions, Eckhard Forster (ed.), Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 177–190. (Scholar)
  • Brook, A., 1994, Kant and the Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Scholar)
  • Brittan, Gordon G., 1978, Kant’s Theory of Science, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
  • Buchdahl, Gerd, 1969, Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Butts, R., 1997, “Kant’s Dialectic and the Logic of Illusion,” in Logic and the Workings of the Mind, ed. Patricia Easton, Atascadero, California: Ridgeview, (Scholar)
  • Caimi, M., 1995, “On a Non-Regulative Function of the Ideal of Pure Reason,” Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress, ed. Hoke Robinson, Volume 1, Part 2 (3A-3L): 539–549. (Scholar)
  • Dyck, C., 2014, Kant and Rational Psychology, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • England, F. E., 1968, Kant’s Conception of God, New York: Humanities Press. (Scholar)
  • Forster, Eckhard, 2000, Kant’s Final Synthesis: An Essay on the Opus Postumum, Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Friedman, M., 1992, “Causal Laws and Foundations of Natural Science,” in Cambridge Companion to Kant, ed. Paul Guyer, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 161–199. (Scholar)
  • Ginsborg, H., 1990, The Role of Taste in Kant’s Theory of Cognition. New York and London: Garland Publishing Company. (Scholar)
  • Guyer, P., 1987, Kant and the Claims of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University press (Scholar)
  • –––, 1990a, “Kant’s Conception of Empirical law,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary Volume), 64: 220–242. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1990b, “Reason and Reflective Judgment: Kant on the Significance of Systematicity,” Noûs, 24: 17–43. (Scholar)
  • Guyer, P. (ed.), 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Scholar)
  • ––– (ed.), 2010, The Cambridge Companion to the Critique of Pure Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Grier, M. , 2001, Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Scholar)
  • –––, 2006, “The Logic of Illusion and the Antinomies,” in Bird (ed.) 2006, Oxford: Blackwell: 192–207. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2010, “The Ideal of Pure Reason,” in P. Guyer (ed.) 2010, pp. 266–289. (Scholar)
  • Heimsoeth, H., 1967, Transzendentale Dialektik. Ein Commentar su Kants Kritik d. reinen Vernunft. Berlin: de Gruyter (Scholar)
  • Henrich, D., 1960, Der Ontologische Gottesbeweis. Sein Problem und seine Geschichte In der Neuzeit, Tubingen: Morh. (Scholar)
  • Horstmann, Rolph P., 1989, “Why must there be a Deduction in Kant’s Critique of Judgment?” in Kant’s Transcendental Deductions, ed. E. Forster, pp. 157–176. Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Kitcher, P., 1990, Kant’s Transcendental Psychology, Oxford: Oxford University Press (Scholar)
  • Longuenesse, B., 1995, “Transcendental Ideal and the Unity of the Critical System,” in Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress, ed. Hoke Robinson, Volume 1, Part 2 (3A-3L), Milwaukee: Marquette University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005, Kant on the Human Standpoint, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Loparic, Z., 1990, “The Logical Structure of the First Antinomy,” Kant-Studien, 81: 280-303. (Scholar)
  • MacFarland, P., 1970, Kant’s Concept of Teleology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University press. (Scholar)
  • Nieman, S., 1994, The Unity of Reason, New York: Oxford University Press (Scholar)
  • O’Neill, Onora, 1992, “Vindicating Reason,” in The Cambridge Companion to Kant, ed. Paul Guyer. Cambridge: Cambridge Unviersity press. (Scholar)
  • Rauscher, F., 2010, “The Appendix to the Dialectic and the Canon of Pure Reason: The Positive Role of Reason,” in P. Guyer (ed.) 2010, pp. 290–309. (Scholar)
  • Rohs, P., 1978, “Kants Prinzip der durchgangigen Bestimmung alles Seienden,” Kant-Studien, 69: 170-180. (Scholar)
  • Sellers, W., 1969, “Metaphysics and the Concept of a Person,” in The Logical Way of Doing Things, ed. K. Lambert, New Haven: Yale University Press: 219–232 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1971, “…This I of He or It (the Thing) which Thinks…Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 44: 5–31 (Scholar)
  • Powell, C. T., 1990, Kant’s Theory of Self-Consciousness, Oxford: Clarendon Press (Scholar)
  • Proops, I., 2010, “Kant’s First Paralogism,” Philosophical Review, 119: 449–95. (Scholar)
  • Strawson, P.F., 1966, The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, London: Methuen. (Scholar)
  • Theis, R., 1985, “De L’illusion transcendentale,” Kant-Studien, 76: 119-137. (Scholar)
  • Theil, U., 2006, “The Critique of Rational Psychology,” in Bird (ed.) 2006: 207–222. (Scholar)
  • Van Cleve, J., 1981, “Reflections on Kant’s Second Antinomy,” Synthese, 47: 481–494. (Scholar)
  • Velkley, R. 1989, Freedom and the End of Reason: On the Moral Foundations of Kant’s Critical Philosophy, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Walker, R., 1990, “Kant’s Conception of Empirical Law,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary Volume), 64: 243–258. (Scholar)
  • Walsh, W. H., 1975, Kant’s Criticisms of Metaphysics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. (Scholar)
  • Wartenberg, T., 1979, “Order Through Reason,” Kant-Studien, 70: 409-424. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1992, “Reason and the Practice of Science,” in Cambridge Companion to Kant, ed. Paul Guyer, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 228–248. (Scholar)
  • Watkins, E., 1998, “Kant’s Antinomies: Sections 3–8,” Kooperativer Kommentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, ed. G. Mohr & M. Willaschek, Berlin: Akademie Verlag: 445–462 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000, “Kant on Rational Cosmology” in Kant and the Sciences, ed E. Watkins, New York: Oxford University Press: 70–89. (Scholar)
  • Wilson, M., 1974, “Leibniz and Materialism,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3: 495–513 (Scholar)
  • Wuerth, J., 2010, “The Paralogisms of Pure Reason,” in P. Guyer (ed.) 2010, pp. 210–244. (Scholar)
  • Wolff, Robert Paul, 1963, Kant’s Theory of Mental Activity, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press (Scholar)
  • Wood, A., 1975, “Kant’s Dialectic,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 5 (4): 595–614. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1978, Kant’s Rational Theology, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2010, “The Antinomies of Pure Reason,” in P. Guyer (ed.) 2010, pp. 245–265. (Scholar)
  • Wood, A. (ed.), 1984, Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy, Ithaca: Cornell University Press (Scholar)

Generated Sun Mar 7 21:18:58 2021