Primary Sources

• Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by L.A. Selby-Bigge, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1888.
• Kant, Immanuel, Kants gesammelte Schriften, edited by Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin: G. Reimer, 1902–
• –––, Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können, edited by Karl Vorländer, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1920.
• –––, Kritik der Reinen Vernunft, edited by Raymund Schmidt, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1956.
• –––, On the Form and Principles of the Sensible and the Intelligible World [Inaugural Dissertation], in Theoretical Philosophy: 1755–1770, translated by David Walford and Ralf Meerbote. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. (Scholar)
• –––, Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft, edited by Konstantin Pollock, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1997.
• –––, Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
• –––, Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, in Theoretical Philosophy after 1781, edited by Henry Allison and Peter Heath, translated by Michael Friedman, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. (Scholar)
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Opera Philosophica quae exstant Latina Gallica Germanica Omnia, edited by J.E. Erdmann. Berlin: G. Eichleri, 1840.
• –––, Die philosophischen Schriften, edited by C.J. Gerhardt. Berlin: Weidmann, 1890.
• –––, Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, edited by Leibniz-Forschungsstelle der Universität Münster (Series 6, Volume 6), Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1962.
• –––, New Essays Concerning Human Understanding, translated by Jonathan Bennett and Peter Remnant, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
• –––, Philosophical Essays, translated by Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber, Indianapolis: Hackett, 1989.
• Locke, John, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, edited by Peter Nidditch, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.
• Newton, Isaac, The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, edited and translated by I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.
• –––, Philosophical Writings, Andrew Janiak (ed.), second edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Secondary Sources

• Adams, Robert Merrihew, 1994. Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Alexander, H.G. (ed.), 1956. The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence, Manchester: Manchester University Press. (Scholar)
• Allais, Lucy, 2009, “Kant, non-conceptual content and the representation of space,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 47: 383–413. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015. Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and his Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Allison, Henry, 2004. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism, 2nd edition, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
• Allison, Henry (ed.), 1973. The Kant-Eberhard Controversy, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
• Anderson, Lanier, 2015, The Poverty of Conceptual Truth: Kant’s analytic/synthetic distinction and the limits of metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Brandt, Reinhard, 1997. “Transzendentale Ästhetik, §§1–3,” in Georg Mohr and Marcus Willaschek (eds.), Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Berlin: Akademie Verlag. (Scholar)
• Broad, C.D., 1978. Kant: An Introduction, edited by C. Lewy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Buchdahl, Gerd, 1969. Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Buroker, Jill Vance, 1981. Space and Incongruence, Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
• Carson, Emily, 1997, “Kant on intuition in geomety,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 27: 489–512. (Scholar)
• Cassirer, Ernst, 1902. Leibniz’ System in seinen wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen, Marburg: Elwert. (Scholar)
• Collins, Arthur, 1999. Possible Experience: Understanding Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
• DiSalle, Robert, 2006. Understanding Space-time: the philosophical development of physics from Newton to Einstein, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Dunlop, Katherine, 2012, “Kant and Strawson on the content of geometrical concepts,” Noûs, 46: 86–126. (Scholar)
• Engstrom, Stephen, 2006. “Understanding and Sensibility,” Inquiry, 49: 2–25. (Scholar)
• Friedman, Michael, 1992. Kant and the Exact Sciences, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Ginsborg, Hannah, 2007, “Was Kant a conconceptualist?” Philosophical Studies, 137: 65–77. (Scholar)
• Grüne, Stefanie, 2017, “Givenness, objective reality and a priori intuition,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 55: 113–130. (Scholar)
• Guyer, Paul, 1987. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018, “The infinite given magnitude and other myths about space and time,” in Ohad Nachtomy and Reed Winegar (eds.), Infinity in Early Modern Philosophy, Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
• Hatfield, Gary, 2006. “Kant on the perception of space (and time),” in Paul Guyer (ed.), Kant and Modern Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Heidegger, Martin, 1962. Die Frage nach dem Ding, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. (Scholar)
• Horstmann, Rolf-Peter, 1997. “Raumanschauung und Geometrie: Bemerkungen zu Kants transcendentaler Ästhetik,” in Bausteine kritischer Theorie: Arbeiten zu Kant, Bodenheim: Philo. (Scholar)
• Ishiguro, Hidé, 1972. Leibniz’s Philosophy of Logic and Language, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
• Janiak, Andrew, 2008. Newton as Philosopher, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Jauernig, Anja, 2008. “Kant’s Critique of the Leibnizian Philosophy: contra the Leibnizians, but pro Leibniz,” in Daniel Garber and Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Langton, Rae, 1998. Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things-in-Themselves, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Longuenesse, Béatrice, 1998. Kant and the Capacity to Judge, translated by Charles Wolfe, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• McDowell, John, 1994, Mind and World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Martin, Gottfried, 1951. Immanuel Kant, Ontologie und Wissenschaftstheorie, Cologne: Kolner Universiteit Verlag; translated by P.G. Lucas as: Kant’s Metaphysics and Theory of Science, Manchester: University of Manchester Press, 1955. (Scholar)
• Messina, James, 2015, “Conceptual analysis and the essence of space: Kant’s Metaphysical Exposition Revisited,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 97: 416–457. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018, “Kant’s stance on the relationalist-substantivalist debate,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 56: 697–726. (Scholar)
• Parsons, Charles, 1992. “The Transcendental Aesthetic,” in Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Paton, H.J., 1936. Kant’s Metaphysic of Experience, London: Routledge Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
• Patton, Lydia, 2011, “The paradox of infinite given magnitude: why Kantian epistemology needs metaphysical space,” Kant-Studien, 102: 273–289. (Scholar)
• Posy, Carl, 2000. “Immediacy and the birth of reference in Kant: the case for space,” in Gila Sher and Richard Tieszen (eds.), Between Logic and Intuition: Essays in Honor of Charles Parsons, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008, “Intuition and infinity: a Kantian theme with echoes in the foundations of mathematics,” in Kant and Philosophy of Science Today (Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 63), Michela Massimi (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Shabel, Lisa, 2005. “Apriority and Application: philosophy of mathematics in the modern period,” in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Math and Logic, Stewart Shapiro (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Smith, Norman Kemp, 1918. A Commentary to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, London: Routledge Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
• Strawson, Peter, 1966. The Bounds of Sense, London: Methuen. (Scholar)
• Sutherland, Daniel, 2022, Kant’s Mathematical World: mathematics, cognition and experience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Thompson, Manley, 1972. “Singular terms and intuitions in Kant’s epistemology,” Review of Metaphysics, 26: 314–343. (Scholar)
• Tolley, Clinton, 2013, “The non-conceptuality of the content of intuitions: a new approach,” Kantian Review, 18: 107–136. (Scholar)
• Vaihinger, Hans, 1922. Kommentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, edited by Raymund Schmidt, Stuttgart: Union deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft. (Scholar)
• Van Cleve, James, 1999. Problems from Kant, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Walker, Ralph C.S., 1978. Kant, London: Routledge Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
• Warren, Daniel, 1998. “Kant and the Apriority of Space,” The Philosophical Review, 107: 179–224. (Scholar)
• Willaschek, Marcus, 1997. “Der transzendentale Idealismus und die Idealität der Raum und Zeit,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 51: 537–564. (Scholar)
• Wilson, Margaret, 1999. Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Wolff, Robert Paul, 1963. Kant’s Theory of Mental Activity: A Commentary on the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Wojtowicz, Randy, 1997. “The Metaphysical Expositions of Space and Time,” Synthese, 113: 71–115. (Scholar)