Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Kant’s Transcendental Idealism" by Nicholas F. Stang

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Works of Kant

The standard German edition of Kant’s works is:

  • [Ak.] Königlichen Preußischen (later Deutschen) Akademie der Wissenschaften (ed.), 1900–, Kants gesammelte Schriften, Berlin: Georg Reimer (later Walter De Gruyter). (Scholar)

The most authoritative English translations of Kant’s works are in:

  • Guyer, P. and A. Wood (eds.), 1992–, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)

Individual volumes used in the preparation of this entry are:

We refer to certain Kantian works by the following abbreviations:

  • [Prolegomena] Prolegomena to any future metaphysics. Translation by Gary Hatfield in Theoretical Philosophy after 1781.
  • [On a discovery] On a discovery according to which all future critiques of reason have been rendered superfluous by a previous one. Translation by Henry Allison in Theoretical Philosophy after 1781.

Other Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

  • Abela, P., 2002, Kant’s Empirical Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Adams, R., 1997, “Things in Themselves”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57: 801–825. (Scholar)
  • Adickes, E., 1924, Kant und das Ding an Sich, Berlin: Pan Verlag. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1929, Kants Lehre von der doppelten Affektion unseres Ichs als Schlüssel zu seiner Erkenntnistheorie, Verlag von J.C.B. Mohr: Tübingen. (Scholar)
  • Allais, L., 2003, “Kant’s transcendental idealism and contemporary anti-realism”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 11: 369–392. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004, “Kant’s “One World”: Interpreting Transcendental Idealism”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 12: 655–684. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2006, “Kant on Intrinsic Natures: a Critique of Langton”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 73: 143–169. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007, “Kant’s Idealism and the Secondary Quality Analogy”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 45: 459–484. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2015, Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and his Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Allison, H., 1968, “Kant’s Concept of the Transcendental Object”, Kant-Studien, 59: 165–186. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1973, “Kant’s Critique of Berkeley”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 11: 43–63. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1976, “The Non-spatiality of Things in Themselves for Kant”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 14: 313–321. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1983, Kant’s Transcendental Idealism, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1987, “Transcendental Idealism: The Two Aspect View”, in Ouden and Moen (eds.), New Essays on Kant, 155–178. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004, Kant’s Transcendental Idealism, New Haven: Yale University Press. Revised and Enlarged Edition. (Scholar)
  • Ameriks, K., 1982, “Recent Work on Kant’s Theoretical Philosophy”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 19: 1–24. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1992, “Kantian Idealism Today”, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 9: 329–342. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2003, Interpreting Kant’s Three Critiques, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Aquila, R., 1979, “Things in Themselves: Intentionality and Reality in Kant”, Archiv Fur Geschichte der Philosophie, 61: 293–307. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1983, Representational Mind: A Study of Kant’s Theory of Knowledge, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
  • Beck, L.W., 1960, A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Beiser, F., 1987, The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy between Kant and Fichte, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002, German Idealism: The Struggle against Subjectivism, 1781–1801, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Bennett, J., 1966, Kant’s Analytic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Bird, G., 1962, Kant’s Theory of Knowledge, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000, “Review of Kantian Humility”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 50: 105–108. (Scholar)
  • Chignell, A., 2010, “Causal Refutations of Idealism”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 60: 487–507. (Scholar)
  • Cohen, H., 1871/1885, Kants Theorie der Erfahrung, Berlin: Dümmler. Third revised edition, 1885. Reprinted in Cohen, Werke, H. Holzhey and H. Weidebach (eds.), Hildesheim: G. Olms. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1907, Kommentar zu Immanuel Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Leipizig: Meiner. (Scholar)
  • Collins, A., 1999, Possible Experience, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Scholar)
  • Cummins, P., 1968, “Kant on Outer and Inner Intuition”, Noûs, 2: 271–292. (Scholar)
  • Dicker, G., 2008, “Kant’s Refutation of Idealism”, Noûs, 42: 80–108. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011, “Kant’s Refutation of Idealism: a Reply to Chignell”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 61: 175–183. (Scholar)
  • Dunlop, K., 2009, “The Unity of Time’s Measure: Kant’s Reply to Locke”, Philosophers’ Imprint, 9: 1–31. (Scholar)
  • Drexler, H., 1904, Die doppelte Affektion des erkennenden Subjekts, Beuthen o.S.: Th. Kirch. (Scholar)
  • Dryer, D.P., 1966, Kant’s Solution for Verification in Metaphysics, London: Allen & Unwin. (Scholar)
  • Emundts, D., 2008, “Kant’s Critique of Berkeley’s Concept of Objectivity”, in D. Garber and B. Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2010, “The Refutation of Idealism and the Distinction between Phenomena and Noumena”, in P. Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Erdmann, B., 1878, Kants Kriticismus in der ersten und in der zweiten Auflage der Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Leipzig: Voss. (Scholar)
  • Falkenstein, L., 1991, “Kant, Mendelssohn, Lambert, and the Subjectivity of Time”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 29: 227–251. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000, “Langton on Things in Themselves”, Kantian Review, 5: 49–64. (Scholar)
  • Findlay, J.N., 1981, Kant and the Transcendental Object, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • Förster, E., 2012, The Twenty Five Years of Philosophy: A Systematic Reconstruction, trans. B. Bowman, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Gram, M., 1975, “The Myth of Double Affection”, in Werkmeister (ed.), Reflections on Kant’s Philosophy. University of Florida Press: Gainesville. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1981, “Intellectual Intuition: The Continuity Thesis”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 42:287–304. (Scholar)
  • Grier, M., 2001, Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Guyer, P., 1983, “Kant’s Intentions in the Refutation of Idealism”, The Philosophical Review, 92: 329–383. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1987, Kant and the Claims of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Heidegger, M. 1929. Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Vittorio Klostermann: Frankfurt a/M. (Scholar)
  • Hanna, R., 2000, “The Inner and the Outer: Kant’s ‘Refutation’ Reconsidered”, Ratio, 13: 146–174. (Scholar)
  • Hogan, D., 2009a, “How to Know Unknowable Things in Themselves ”, Noûs, 43: 49–63. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2009b, “Noumenal Affection”, The Philosophical Review, 4: 501–532. (Scholar)
  • Kemp Smith, N., 1962, A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, New York: Humanities Press. (Scholar)
  • Köhnke, K., 1986, Entstehung und Aufstieg des Neukantianismus: die deutsche Universitatsphilosophie zwischen Idealismus und Positivismus, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (Scholar)
  • Langton, R., 1998, Kantian Humility, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011, “Kant’s Phenomena: Extrinsic or Relational Properties? A Reply to Allais”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 73: 170–185. (Scholar)
  • Marshall, C., 2013, “Kant’s Appearances and Things in Themselves as Qua-Objects”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 63: 520–545. (Scholar)
  • Matthews, H.E., 1969, “Strawson on Transcendental Idealism”, The Philosophical Review, 19: 204–220. (Scholar)
  • McDaniel, K., Ms, “Kantian Ignorance”. (Scholar)
  • Paton, H.J., 1936, Kant’s Metaphysic of Experience, 2 vols., London: Allen & Unwin. (Scholar)
  • Patton, L., 2005, “The Critical Philosophy Renewed: The Bridge Between Hermann Cohen’s Early Work on Kant and Later Philosophy of Science”, Angelaki, 10: 109–118. (Scholar)
  • Prauss, G., 1974, Kant und das Problem der Dinge an Sich, Bonn: Grundman. (Scholar)
  • Richardson, A., 2003, “Conceiving, Experiencing, and Conceiving Experience: Neo-Kantianism and the History of the Concept of Experience”, Topoi, 22: 55–67. (Scholar)
  • Robinson, H., 1994, “Two Perspectives on Kant’s Appearances and Things-in-Themselves”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33: 411–441. (Scholar)
  • Rosefeldt, T., 2001, “Review of Kantian Humility”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 9 (2001): 236–69. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007, “Dinge an sich und sekundäre Qualitäten”, in J. Stolzenberg (ed.), Kant in der Gegenwart, Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 167–209. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013, “Subject-Dependence and Trendelenburg’s Gap”, in Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, New York and Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, vol. 2, 755–64. (Scholar)
  • Sassen, B., 2000, Kant’s Early Critics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Schopenhauer, A., 1938, Sämtliche Werke, edited by Arthur Hubscher, Leipzig: Brockhaus. (Scholar)
  • Sellars, W., 1968, Science and Metaphysics: Variations on Kantian Themes, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
  • Stang, N., 2012, “Kant on Complete Determination and Infinite Judgment”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 20: 1117–1139. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013, “Freedom, Knowledge and Affection”, Kantian Review, 18(1): 96–106. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2014, “The Non-Identity of Appearances and Things in Themselves”, Noûs, 48(1): 106–136. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2015, “Who’s Afraid of Double Affection?” Philosophers’ Imprint, 15:1–28. (Scholar)
  • Strawson, P.F., 1966, The Bounds of Sense, London: Methuen. (Scholar)
  • Turbayne, C., 1955, “Kant’s Refutation of Dogmatic Idealism”, Philosophical Quarterly, 5: 225–244. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1969, “Kant’s Relation to Berkeley”, in L.W. Beck (ed.), Kant Studies Today, La Salle, IL: Open Court. (Scholar)
  • Vaihinger, H., 1881/1892, Commentar zur Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, 2 vols., Stuttgart: W. Spemann. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1884, “Zu KantsWiderlegung des Idealismus”, Strassberger Abhandlungen zur Philosophie, Freiburg: Mohr. (Scholar)
  • Van Cleve, J., 1999, Problems from Kant, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Vogel, J., 1993, “The Problem of Self-Knowledge in Kant’s ‘Refutation of Idealism’”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 53: 875–887. (Scholar)
  • Walker, R., 1985, “Idealism: Kant and Berkeley”, in J. Foster and H. Robinson (ed.), Essays on Berkeley, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2010, “Kant on the Number of Worlds”,British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 18: 821–843. (Scholar)
  • Weldon, T.D., 1958, Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • Westphal, M., 1968, “In Defense of the Thing in Itself”, Kant-Studien, 59: 118–141. (Scholar)
  • Westphal, K.R., 2000, “Kant, Hegel, and the fate of ‘the’ Intuitive Intellect”, in S. Sedgewick (ed.), The Reception of Kant’s Critical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Wilson, M., 1971, “Kant and the ‘Dogmatic Idealism of Berkeley”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 9: 459–475. Reprinted in Wilson (ed.), 1999, Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy, Princeton: Princeton University Press: 277–293. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Aug 14 10:33:41 2022