Primary Literature: Works by Kant

• Gesammelte Schriften, Koniglichen Preussischen Academie der Wissenschaften (ed.), 29 Volumes, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter et al., 1902–
• 1781/1787, Critique of Pure Reason (trans. P. Guyer and A. Wood). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987. (References to CPR are in the standard pagination of the 1^st (A) and 2^nd (B) editions. A reference to only one edition means that the passage appeared only in that edition.)
• 1785, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, (trans. M. Gregor). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
• 1788, Critique of Practical Reason (trans. M. Gregor). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
• 1790, Critique of the Power of Judgment (trans. P. Guyer and E. Matthews). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
• 1804, Opus Postumum (trans. E. Förster and M. Rosen). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Secondary Literature

• Adams, R. M., 1983. “Phenomenalism and Corporeal Substance in Leibniz,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8: 217–57. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994. Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Adickes, E., 1889. Immanuel Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Berlin: Mayer & Müller. (Scholar)
• Allais, L., 2011. “Transcendental Idealism and the Transcendental Deduction,” in Kant’s Idealism, D. Schulting and J. Verburgt, (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 91–107. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015. Manifest Reality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Allison, H., 1983/2004. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism, New Haven: Yale University Press; second edition, 2004. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015. Kant’s Transcendental Deduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Aquila, R., 1989. Matter and Mind, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
• Ameriks, K., 1978. “Kant’s Transcendental Deduction as a Regressive Argument,” Kant-Studien, 69: 273–87. (Scholar)
• Baum, M., 1986. Deduktion und Beweis in Kants Transzendentalphilosophie, Konigstein, Athenaeum. (Scholar)
• Beck, L. W., 1978. “Did the Sage of Königsberg Have No Dreams?” in L. W. Beck (ed.), Essays on Kant and Hume, New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 38–60. (Scholar)
• Bennett, J., 1966. Kant’s Analytic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1979. “Analytic Transcendental Arguments,” in Bieri, Horstmann and Krüger (eds.), 1979, pp. 45–64. (Scholar)
• Berkeley, G., 1710. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, Jonathan Dancy (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. (Scholar)
• –––, 1713. Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous, Jonathan Dancy (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. (Scholar)
• Bieri, P., Horstmann, R., and Krüger, L. (eds.), 1979. Transcendental Arguments and Science: Essays in Epistemology, Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
• Bird, G., 1962/1973. Kant’s Theory of Knowledge, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; reprinted, New York: Humanities Press, 1973. (Scholar)
• Brueckner, A., 1983. “Transcendental Arguments I,” Noûs, 17: 551–75. (Scholar)
• –––, 1984. “Transcendental Arguments II,” Noûs, 18: 197–225. (Scholar)
• –––, 1996. “Modest Transcendental Arguments,” Philosophical Perspectives, 10: 265–80. (Scholar)
• Caird, E., 1889. The Critical Philosophy of Kant, New York: Macmillan. (Scholar)
• Carl, W., 1989. “Kant’s First Drafts of the Deduction of the Categories,” in Förster 1989, pp. 3–26. (Scholar)
• –––, 1992. Die Transzendentale Deduktion der Kategorien in der erstren Auflage der Kritik der reinen Vernuft, Frankfurt: Klostermann. (Scholar)
• Cassam, Q., 1999. Self and World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Chignell, A., 2010. “Causal Refutations of Idealism,” Philosophical Quarterly, 60: 487–507. (Scholar)
• Coates, J., 2017. “Strawson’s Modest Transcendental Argument,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 25: 799–822. (Scholar)
• Dicker, G., 2004. Kant’s Theory of Knowledge, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008. “Kant’s Refutation of Idealism,” Noûs, 42: 80–108. (Scholar)
• Dickerson, A. B., 2004. Kant on Representation and Objectivity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Dufour, E., 2003. “Remarque sur la note du paragraph 26 de l’Analytique transcendentale,” Kant-Studien 94(1): 69–79. (Scholar)
• Dyck, C., 2011. “Kant’s Transcendental Deduction and the Ghosts of Descartes and Hume,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 19: 473–96. (Scholar)
• Falkenstein, Lorne. 1995. Kant’s Intuitionism, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Scholar)
• Fichant, M. 1997. “L’espace est représenté comme une grandeur infinie donnée: La radicalité de l’esthétique,”Philosophie 56(1): 20–48.
• Förster, E. (ed.), 1989. Kant’s Transcendental Deductions, Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
• Friedman, M., 2012. “Kant on Geometry and Spatial Intuition,” Synthese 186(1): 231–255. (Scholar)
• Gomes, A., 2010. “Is Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Fit for Purpose?” Kantian Review, 15(2): 118–137. (Scholar)
• Grüne, S., 2011. “Is There a Gap in Kant’s B Deduction?”International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19: 465–90. (Scholar)
• Guyer, P., 1977. “Review of W. H. Walsh, Kant and the Criticism of Metaphysics,” The Philosophical Review, 86: 264–70. (Scholar)
• –––, 1987. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Hanna, R., 2008. “Kantian Non-Conceptualism,” Philosophical Studies, 137: 41–64. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011. “Beyond the Myth of the Myth: A Kantian Theory of Non-Conceptual Content,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 43: 91–110. (Scholar)
• Heidegger, M., 1929/1997. Immanuel Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, Friedrich Cohen; translated as Immanuel Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, by Richard Taft, fifth edition, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
• Henrich, D., 1968–9. “The Proof-structure of Kant’s Transcendental Deduction,” Review of Metaphysics, 22: 640–59. (Scholar)
• –––, 1989. “Kant’s Notion of a Deduction,” in Förster 1989, pp. 29–46. (Scholar)
• Hogan, D., 2021. “Handedness, Idealism, and Freedom,” The Philosophical Review, 130(3): 385–449. (Scholar)
• Howell, R., 1992. Kant’s Transcendental Deduction, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001. ‘Kant, the ‘I think’ and Self-Awareness,’ in P. Cicovacki (ed.), Kant’s Legacy, Rochester: University of Rochester Press, pp. 117–52. (Scholar)
• Hume, D., 1739. A Treatise of Human Nature, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978. (Scholar)
• –––, 1748. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. (Scholar)
• Husserl, E., 1913. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Vol. 1. In: Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 1,1, 1–323 [= Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy—First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology, trans. F. Kersten. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1982]. (Scholar)
• –––, 1939. Erfahrung und Urteil. Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik. Ausgearbeitet und herausgegeben von Ludwig Landgrebe. Prag: Academia Verlagsbuchhandlung [= Experience and Judgement, trans. J. S. Churchill and K. Ameriks. London: Routledge, 1973]. (Scholar)
• Jauernig, A., 2021. The World according to Kant: Appearances and Things in Themselves in Critical Idealism, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Kaye, L. J., 2015. Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the Categories: Unity, Representation, and Apperception, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. (Scholar)
• Keller, P., 1998. Kant and the Demands of Self-Consciousness, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Kemp-Smith, N., 1923. A Commentary to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, New York: Humanities Press, 1962, second edition. (Scholar)
• Kitcher, Patricia, 1990. Kant’s Transcendental Psychology, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011. Kant’s Thinker, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Kitcher, Philip, 1981. ‘How Kant Almost Wrote ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism,’ Philosophical Topics, 12: 217–49. (Scholar)
• Korsgaard, C., 1996. The Sources of Normativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Kuehn, M., 1997. “The Wolffian Background to Kant’s Transcendental Deduction,” in Logic and the Workings of the Mind, P. A. Easton (ed.), Atascadero: Ridgeview Press, pp. 229–50. (Scholar)
• Longuenesse, B., 1998. Kant and the Capacity to Judge, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2000. “Kant’s Categories and the Capacity to Judge,” Inquiry, 43: 91–110. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017. I, Me, Mine, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• McCann, E., 1985 “Skepticism and Kant’s B-Deduction,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 2: 71–89. (Scholar)
• McLear, C., 2014. “The Kantian (Non)-Conceptualism Debate,” Philosophy Compass, 9(11): 769–90. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015. “Two Kinds of Unity in the Critique of Pure Reason,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 53(1), pp. 79–110. (Scholar)
• –––, 2020. “Kantian Conceptualism/Nonconceptualism,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = . (Scholar)
• Melnick, A., 1973., Kant’s Analogies of Experience, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Messina, J., 2014., “Kant on the Unity of Space and the Synthetic Unity of Apperception,” Kant-Studien, 105(1): 5–40. (Scholar)
• Nagel, T., 1997. The Last Word, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Onof, C., and D. Schulting, 2015. “Space as Formal Intuition and as Form of Intuition,” The Philosophical Review, 124: 1–58. (Scholar)
• Paton, H. J., 1936. Kant’s Metaphysic of Experience, London: Allen and Unwin, 2 vols. (Scholar)
• Pereboom, D., 1988. “Kant on Intentionality,” Synthèse, 77(3): 321–52. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990. “Kant on Justification in Transcendental Philosophy,” Synthèse, 85: 25–54. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995. “Self-Understanding in Kant’s Transcendental Deduction,” Synthèse, 103: 1–42. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006. “Kant’s Metaphysical and Transcendental Deductions,” in The Blackwell Guide to Kant, G. Bird (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 154–68. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016. “Transcendental Arguments,” in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology, J. Hawthorne, H. Cappelen, and T. Gendler (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 444–62. (Scholar)
• –––, 2022. Wrongdoing and the Moral Emotions, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Pollok, K., 2008. “‘An Almost Single Inference’ – Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Reconsidered,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 90: 323–45. (Scholar)
• Rosefeldt, T., 2000. Das logische Ich: Kant über den Gehalt des Begriffes von sich selbst, Berlin: Philo. (Scholar)
• –––, 2022. “Kant on Decomposing Synthesis and the Intuition of Infinite Space,” Philosophers’ Imprint, 22: 1–32. (Scholar)
• Rorty, R., 1979. “Transcendental Arguments, Self-Reference, and Pragmatism,” in Bieri, Horstmann & Krüger (eds.), 1979, pp. 77–103. (Scholar)
• Russell, B., 1912. The Problems of Philosophy, London, Williams and Norgate; New York, Henry Holt & Co. (Scholar)
• Sacks, M., 1999. “Transcendental Arguments and the Inference to Reality,” in Stern (ed.) 1999, pp. 67–83. (Scholar)
• –––, 2000. Objectivity and Insight, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Schulting, D., 2012a. Kant’s Deduction and Apperception: Explaining the Categories, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012b. “Kant, Non-Conceptual Content, and the ‘Second Step’ of the B-Deduction,” Kant Studies Online: 51–92. (Scholar)
• Sethi, J., 2020. “‘For Me, In My Present State’: Kant on Judgments of Perception and Mere Subjective Validity,” Journal of Modern Philosophy, 2(1): 1–20. (Scholar)
• Smit, H., 1999. “The Role of Reflection in the Critique of Pure Reason,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 80: 203–23. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009. “Kant on Apriority and the Spontaneity of Cognition,” in Metaphysics and the Good: Themes from the Philosophy of Robert Merrihew Adams, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 188–251. (Scholar)
• Stang, N., 2018. “Hermann Cohen and Kant’s Concept of Experience,” in Philosophie und Wissenschaft bei Hermann Cohen, Christian Damböck (ed.), pp. 13–40. (Scholar)
• Stern, R., 1999. “On Kant’s Response to Hume: The Second Analogy as Transcendental Argument,” in Stern 1999a, pp. 47–66. (Scholar)
• –––, 2000. Transcendental Arguments and Scepticism: Answering the Question of Justification, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017. “Transcendental Arguments,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 edition), Edward N. Zalta, (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/transcendental-arguments/>. (Scholar)
• Stern, R. (ed.), 1999a. Transcendental Arguments, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Sutherland, D., 2021. Kant’s Mathematical World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Strawson, P. F., 1966. The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, London: Methuen. (Scholar)
• Stroud, B., 1968. “Transcendental Arguments,” Journal of Philosophy, 65: 241–56. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994. “Kantian Argument, Conceptual Capacities, and Invulnerability,” in Paolo Parrini (ed.), Kant and Contemporary Epistemology, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 231–51. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999. “The Goal of Transcendental Arguments,” in Stern 1999a, pp. 155–72. (Scholar)
• van Cleve, J., 1999. Problems From Kant, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Williams, J. J., 2018. “Kant on the Original Synthesis of Understanding and Sensibility,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 28(1): 66–86. (Scholar)
• Wilson, M. D., 1987. “The Phenomenalisms of Leibniz and Berkeley,” in Essays on George Berkeley, Ernest Sosa (ed.), Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 3–22. (Scholar)
• Wolff, R. P., 1963. Kant’s Theory of Mental Activity, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Vaihinger, H., 1881–2. Commentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Stuttgart: W. Spellman. (Scholar)
• Vinci, T., 2014. Space, Geometry, and Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the Categories, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Vogel, J., 1993. “The Problem of Self-Knowledge in Kant’s ‘Refutation of Idealism,’” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 53: 875–87. (Scholar)