Works by Lakatos

• 1946a: “Citoyen és Munkásosztály” (Citoyen and the working class), Valóság, 1: 77–88. (Scholar)
• 1946b: “A fizikai Idealizmus Bírálata” (A critique of idealism in physics); a review of Susan Stebbing’s Philosophy and the Physicists, Athenaeum, 1: 28–33. (Scholar)
• 1947a: “Huszadik Század”, Forum, 1: 316–20. (Scholar)
• 1947b: “Eötvös Collégium—Györffy Kollégium”, Valóság, 2: 107–24. (Scholar)
• 1947c: “Jeges Károly: Megtanulom a fizikát”, Társadalmi Szemle, 1: 472. (Scholar)
• 1947d: “Természettudományos világnézet és demokratikus nevelés” (Scientific worldview and democratic upbringing), Embernevelés, 2: 63–66. (Scholar)
• 1947e: “Modern fizika—modern társadalom” (Modern physics—modern society), in Kemény Gábor (ed.), Továbbképzés és demokrácia. [There is an English translation of this essay in Kampis et al. 2002: 356–368.] (Scholar)
• 1947f: “‘Haladó tudós’ a demokráciában” (A “progressive scholar” in a democracy), Tovább, June 13. (Scholar)
• 1956: Speech at the Pedagogy Debate of the Petőfi Circle on September 28, 1956; transcript published in András B. Hegedűs (ed.), A Petőfi Kör vitái (The debates of the Petőfi Circle), Vol. VI, Budapest: Intézet and Múzsák Kiadó, 1992, 34–38. [English translation “On rearing scholars” in Motterlini 1999: 375–381.] (Scholar)
• 1961: “Essays in the Logic of Mathematical Discovery”. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Cambridge University.
• 1962 [Regress]: “Infinite Regress and Foundations of Mathematics”, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 36: 155–94. [Republished as chapter 1 of Lakatos 1978b (PP2), cited pages from this version.] (Scholar)
• 1963: Discussion of “History of Science as an Academic Discipline” by A.C. Crombie and M.A. Hoskin, in A.C. Crombie (ed.), Scientific Change, London: Heinemann, pp. 781–5. [Republished as chapter 13 of Lakatos 1978b (PP2).] (Scholar)
• 1963–4: “Proofs and Refutations”, in the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 14: 1–25, 120–139, 221–243, 296–342. [Reprinted in Lakatos 1976c (P&R). cited pages from this version.] (Scholar)
• 1967a [Renaissance]: “A Renaissance of Empiricism in the Recent Philosophy of Mathematics”, in Lakatos 1967b: 199–202. [Republished in an expanded form as 1978b (PP2), cited pages from this version.] (Scholar)
• 1967b: (ed.), Problems in the Philosophy of Mathematics, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
• 1968a: “Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 69: 149–186. (Scholar)
• 1968b [Changes]: “Changes in the Problem of Inductive Logic”, in Lakatos 1968c, 315–417 [Reprinted as chapter 8 of PP2, cited pages from this version.] (Scholar)
• 1968c: (ed.), The Problem of Inductive Logic, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
• 1968d: (edited with A. Musgrave) Problems in the Philosophy of Science, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
• 1968e: “A Letter to the Director of the London School of Economics”, in C.B. Cox and A.E. Dyson (eds.), Fight for Education, A Black Paper, London: Critical Quarterly Society, 28–31. [Republished as chapter 12 of Lakatos 1978b (PP2), referred to, in this reprint, as LTD.] (Scholar)
• 1970a [FMSRP]: “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, in Lakatos 1970b, 91–196 (Republished as chapter 1 of Lakatos 1978a, PP1, cited pages from this version.) (Scholar)
• 1970b, editor with A. Musgrave: Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• 1970c: Discussion of “Knowledge and Physical Reality” by A. Mercier, in A.D. Breck and W. Yourgrau (eds.), Physics, Logic and History, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 53–4. (Scholar)
• 1970d: Discussion of ‘Scepticism and the Study of History’ by Richard H. Popkin, in A.D. Breck and W. Yourgrau (eds.), Physics, Logic and History, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 220–3. (Scholar)
• 1971a [HS&IRR]: “The History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions”, in R.C. Buck and R.S. Cohen (eds.), PSA 1970: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 8, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 91–135. [Republished as chapter 2 of Lakatos 1978a (PP1), cited pages from this version] (Scholar)
• 1971b: “Replies to Critics”, in R.C. Buck and R.S. Cohen (eds.): PSA 1970: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 8, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 174–82. (Scholar)
• 1974a: “Discussion Remarks on Papers by Ne‘eman, Yahil, Beckler, Sambursky, Elkana, Agassi, Mendelsohn”, in Y. Elkana (ed.), The Interaction Between Science and Philosophy, Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press, pp. 41, 155–6, 163, 165, 167, 280–3, 285–6, 288–9, 292, 294–6, 427–8, 430–1, 435. (Scholar)
• 1974b [PDI]: “Popper on Demarcation and Induction”, in P.A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, La Salle: Open Court, 241–73. [Republished as chapter 3 of Lakatos 1978a (PP1), cited pages from this version.] (Scholar)
• 1974c: “The Role of Crucial Experiments in Science”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 4: 309–25. (Scholar)
• 1974d [S&P]: “Science and Pseudoscience”, in Vesey, G. (ed.), Philosophy in the Open, Open University Press. [Republished as the introduction to Lakatos1978a (PP1), cited pages from this version.] (Scholar)
• 1976a: [UT] “Understanding Toulmin”, Minerva, 14: 126–43. [Republished as chapter 11 of Lakatos 1978b.] (Scholar)
• 1976b [Renaissance]: “A Renaissance of Empiricism in the Recent Philosophy of Mathematics?”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 27: 201–23. [Republished as chapter 2 of Lakatos 1978b (PP2), cited pages from this version.] (Scholar)
• 1976c [P&R]: Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery, J. Worrall and E. Zahar (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• 1976d [WDCRPSP]: “Why Did Copernicus’s Programme Supersede Ptolemy’s?”, by I. Lakatos and E.G. Zahar, in R. Westman (ed.), The Copernican Achievement, Los Angeles: University of California Press, 354–83. [Republished as chapter 5 of PP1, cited pages from this version.] (Scholar)
• 1978a [PP1]: The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (Philosophical Papers: Volume 1), J. Worrall and G. Currie (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• 1978b [PP2]: Mathematics, Science and Epistemology (Philosophical Papers: Volume 2), J. Worrall and G. Currie (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• 1978c: “Cauchy and the Continuum:the Significance of Non-Standard Analysis for the History and Philosophy of Mathematics”. [Published as chapter 5 of PP1]
• 1999a: “Lectures on Scientific Method” in Motterlini 1999: 19–109
• 1999b: “Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence” in Motterlini 1999: 119–374. (Scholar)
• 1999c: “On Rearing Scholars” in Motterlini 1999: 375–381. (Scholar)
• 1999d: “The Intellectuals’ Betrayal of Reason” in Motterlini 1999: 393–397. (Scholar)

Secondary Literature

• Ariew, R., 2014, “Pierre Duhem”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 edition), E.N. Zalta (ed.). URL=<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/duhem/> (Scholar)
• Bandy, A., 2009, Chess and Chocolate: Unlocking Lakatos, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. (Scholar)
• Brown, M.B. and G. Priest, 2015, “Chunk and Permeate II: Bohr’s Hydrogen Atom”, European Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 5(3): 297–314. doi:10.1007/s13194-014-0104-7 (Scholar)
• Chalmers, A.F., 2013, What Is This Thing Called Science, 4^th edition, Brisbane: University of Queensland Press. First edition in 1976. (Scholar)
• Cohen, R.S., P.K. Feyerabend, and M.W. Wartofsky (eds.), 1976, Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 39, Dordrecht/Boston: Reidel (Scholar)
• Congden, L. 1997, “Possessed: Lakatos”s Road to 1956, Contemporary European History, 6(3), 279—294. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, “Lakatos’s Political Reawakening” in G. Kampis et al. 2002: 339–349. (Scholar)
• Dostoevsky, F.M., 1994 [1871–72], Demons, R. Pevear and L. Volkhonsky (trans.), New York: Knopf. (Scholar)
• Feyerabend, P.K., 1968, “Consolation for the Specialist” in Lakatos (and Musgrave) 1970b: 197–230. (Scholar)
• –––, 1975a, “Imre Lakatos”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 26: 1–18. (Scholar)
• –––, 1975b, Against Method, London: New Left Books. (Scholar)
• Flynn, J.R., 1987, “Massive IQ Gains in Fourteen Nations: What IQ Tests Really Measure” Psychological Bulletin, 101: 171–191. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, What Is Intelligence: Beyond the Flynn Effect, expanded edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Fox, J., 1981, “Critical notice: Appraising Lakatos”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 59(1): 92–103. doi:10.1080/00048408112340071 (Scholar)
• Gavroglu, K., Y. Goudaroulis, and P. Nicolaccopoulos (eds.), 1989, Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 111, Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Scholar)
• Godfrey-Smith, P., 2003, Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Hacking, I., 1983, Representing and Intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Hanson, N.R., 1963, “Commentary”, in A.C. Crombie (ed), Scientific Change, London: Heinemann, 458–466. (Scholar)
• Hegel, W.G.F., 2008 [1820/21], The Philosophy of Right, Knox and Houlgate (trans.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Howson, C. (ed.), 1976, Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Kolakowski, L., 1978, Main Currents of Marxism (Volume 2: The Golden Age), P. Falla (trans.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Kadvany, J., 2001, Imre Lakatos and the Guises of Reason, Durham and London: Duke University Press. (Scholar)
• Kampis, George, Ladislav Kvasz, and Michael Stöltzner (eds.), 2002, Appraising Lakatos, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
• Kuhn, T.S., 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1970, “Reflections on My Critics”, in Lakatos (and Musgrave) 1970b: 231–278. (Scholar)
• –––, 1977, The Essential Tension, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Larvor, B., 1998, Lakatos: An Introduction, London: Routledge (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, “Lakatos’ Mathematical Hegelianism” The Owl of Minerva, 31(1): 23–44. [Larvor 1999 available online] (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, “What is Dialectical Philosophy of Mathematics?” Philosophia Mathematica, 9(1): 212–229. (Scholar)
• Latsis, S.J. (ed.), 1976, Method and Appraisal in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Long, J., 1998, “Lakatos in Hungary”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 28: 244–311. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, “The Unforgiven: Imre Lakatos’ Life in Hungary”, in G. Kampis, et al. 2002: 263–302. (Scholar)
• Lukács, G., 1971 [1923], History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics, R. Livingstone (trans.), Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014 [1919], Tactics and Ethics 1919–1929, M. McColgan (trans.), London: Verso. (Scholar)
• Marx, K., 1976, Capital (Volume 1), B. Fowkes (trans.), Harmondsworth, Penguin. (Scholar)
• Motterlini, M. (ed.), 1999 [F&AM], For and Against Method, including Lakatos’s Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Musgrave, A.E., 1976, “Method or Madness” in R.S. Cohen, et al. 1976: 457–491. (Scholar)
• –––, 1983, “Facts and Values in Science Studies”, in R.W. Home (ed), Science Under Scrutiny, Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, volume 3, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 49–79. (Scholar)
• Orwell, G., 2008 [1949], Nineteen Eighty-Four, Harmondsworth: Penguin, originally published in 1949 London: Secker & Warburg. (Scholar)
• Piketty, T., 2014, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Pólya, G., 1945, How to Solve It, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Popper, K.R., 1963 [C&R], Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• –––, 1966, The Open Society and Its Enemies, 5^th edition (2 Volumes), London: Routledge. First edition in 1945. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002 [LSD], The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Routledge Classics; originally published as Logik der Forschung, Vienna: J. Springer, 1935. (Scholar)
• Priest, G., 2002, Beyond the Limits of Thought, 2^nd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. First edition in 1995. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, In Contradiction, 2^nd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. First edition in 1987, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff. (Scholar)
• Radnitzky, G. and G. Andersson (eds.), 1978, Progress and Rationality in Science (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science Volume 58), Dordrecht/Boston/London: Reidel (Scholar)
• Roplyi, L., 2002, “Lakatos and Lukács” in Kampis et al. 2002: 303–338. (Scholar)
• Russell, B., 2010 [1918], The Philosophy of Logical Atomism, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• –––, 1944, “Reply to Criticisms”, in P. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, Evanston and Chicago: Northwestern University Press, pp. 679–741. (Scholar)
• Schilpp, P.A. (ed.), 1944, The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, Evanston: North Western University Press. (Scholar)
• Schilpp, P.A. (ed.), 1974, The Philosophy of Karl Popper, La Salle: Open Court. (Scholar)
• Urbach, P., 1974, “Progress and Degeneration in the ‘IQ Debate’”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 25: 99–135, 235–259. (Scholar)
• Zahar, E., 1973, “Why did Einstein’s Programme supersede Lorentz’s?”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 24: 95–123, 223–262. (Scholar)