Primoratz 1999, Honderich 2005, and Ellis 2012 are useful introductory books. Duff and Garland 1994; Ashworth, von Hirsch; and Roberts 2009; and Tonry 2011 are useful collections of readings.

• Adler, J., 1992, The Urgings of Conscience, Philadelphia: Temple University Press. (Scholar)
• Alexander, L., 1980, ‘The Doomsday Machine: Proportionality, Punishment and Prevention’, The Monist, 63: 199–227. (Scholar)
• Altman, A., and C. H. Wellman, 2004, ‘A defense of international criminal law,’ Ethics, 115: 35–67.
• Anderson, J. L., 1997, ‘Reciprocity as a Justification for Retributivism’, Criminal Justice Ethics, 16: 13–25. (Scholar)
• Ardal, P., 1984, ‘Does Anyone ever Deserve to Suffer?’ Queen’s Quarterly, 91–2: 241–57. (Scholar)
• Ashworth, A. J., 1993, ‘Some Doubts about Restorative Justice ’, Criminal Law Forum, 4: 277–99. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, Sentencing and Criminal Justice, 5th edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Ashworth, A. J., A. von Hirsch, and J. Roberts (eds.), 2009, Principled Sentencing, 3rd edition, Oxford: Hart Publishing. (Scholar)
• Ashworth, A. J., and L. Zedner, 2011, ‘Just Prevention: Preventive Rationales and the Limits of the Criminal Law’, in R. A. Duff and S. P. Green (eds), Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 279–303. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, ‘Prevention and Criminalization: Justifications and Limits’, New Criminal Law Review, 15: 542–571. (Scholar)
• Ashworth, A. J., L. Zedner, and P. Tomlin (eds.), 2013, Prevention and the Limits of the Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Bagaric, M., and K. Amarasekara, 2000, ‘The Errors of Retributivism’, Melbourne University Law Review, 24: 1–66. (Scholar)
• Baker, B. M., 1992, ‘Consequentialism, Punishment and Autonomy’, in W. Cragg (ed.), Retributivism and Its Critics, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 149–61. (Scholar)
• Barnett, R., 1977, ‘Restitution: A New Paradigm of Criminal Justice’, Ethics 87: 279–301. (Scholar)
• Becker, L., 1974, ‘Criminal Attempts and the Theory of the Law of Crimes’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 3: 262–94. (Scholar)
• Bennett, C., 2008, The Apology Ritual: A Philosophical Theory of Punishment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Bentham, J., 1789, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, [available online]. (Scholar)
• Berman, M., 2011, ‘Two Kinds of Retributivism’, in R. A. Duff and S. P. Green (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 433–457. (Scholar)
• Bianchi, H., 1994, Justice as Sanctuary: Toward a New System of Crime Control, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Scholar)
• Bickenbach, J. E., 1988, ‘Critical Notice of R. A. Duff, Trials and Punishments’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 18: 765–86. (Scholar)
• Boonin, D., 2008, The Problem of Punishment, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Bottoms, A., 1998, ‘Five Puzzles in von Hirsch’s Theory of Punishment’, in A. J. Ashworth and M. Wasik (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 53–100. (Scholar)
• Braithwaite, J., 1999, ‘Restorative Justice: Assessing Optimistic and Pessimistic Accounts’, in Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Volume 23, ed. M. Tonry, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 241–367. (Scholar)
• Braithwaite, J., and P. Pettit, 1990, Not Just Deserts, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Brettschneider, C., 2007, ‘The Rights of the Guilty: Punishment and Political Legitimacy?’, Political Theory, 35: 175–199. (Scholar)
• Brooks, T., 2013, Punishment, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Burgh, R. W., 1982, ‘Do the Guilty Deserve Punishment?’ Journal of Philosophy, 79: 193–210. (Scholar)
• Chiao, V., 2016, ‘Two Conceptions of the Criminal Law’, in C. Flanders and Z. Hoskins (eds.), The New Philosophy of Criminal Law, London: Rowman Littlefield Intl., 19–36. (Scholar)
• Christie, N., 1977, ‘Conflicts as Property’. British Journal of Criminology, 17: 1–15. (Scholar)
• –––, 1981, Limits to Pain, London: Martin Robertson. (Scholar)
• Cottingham, J., 1979, ‘Varieties of Retribution’, Philosophical Quarterly, 29: 238–46. (Scholar)
• Dagger, R., 1993, ‘Playing Fair with Punishment’, Ethics, 103: 473–88. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, ‘Republican Punishment: Consequentialist or Retributivist’, in C. Laborde and J. Maynor (eds.), Republicanism and Political Theory, Oxford: Blackwell, 219–45. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008, ‘Punishment as Fair Play’, Res Publica, 14: 259–275. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, ‘Social Contracts, Fair Play, and the Justification of Punishment’, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 8: 341–368. (Scholar)
• Daly, K., and R. Immarigeon, 1998, ‘The Past, Present, and Future of Restorative Justice’, Contemporary Justice Review, 1: 21–45. (Scholar)
• Davis, L. H., 1972, ‘They Deserve to Suffer’, Analysis, 32: 136–40. (Scholar)
• Davis, M., 1989, ‘The Relative Independence of Punishment Theory’, Law and Philosophy, 7: 321–50. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991, ‘Punishment as Language: Misleading Analogy for Desert Theorists’, Law and Philosophy, 10: 310–322. (Scholar)
• –––, 1992, To Make the Punishment Fit the Crime, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1996, Justice in the Shadow of Death: Rethinking Capital and Lesser Punishments, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. (Scholar)
• de Haan, W., 1990, The Politics of Redress: Crime, Punishment and Penal Abolition, London: Unwin Hyman. (Scholar)
• de Keijser, J. W., 2011, ‘Never Mind the Pain, It’s a Measure!: Justifying Measures as Part of the Dutch Bifurcated System of Sanctions’, in M. Tonry (ed.), Why Punish? How Much?, New York: Oxford University Press, 188–213. (Scholar)
• Deigh, J., 1984, ‘On the Right to be Punished: Some Doubts’, Ethics, 94: 191–211. (Scholar)
• Demetriou, D., 2012, ‘Justifying Punishment: The Educative Approach as Presumptive Favorite’, Criminal Justice Ethics, 31: 2–18. (Scholar)
• Dempsey, M. M., 2009, Prosecuting Domestic Violence, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Dimock, S., 1997, ‘Retributivism and Trust’, Law and Philosophy, 16: 37–62. (Scholar)
• Dolinko, D., 1991, ‘Some Thoughts about Retributivism’, Ethics, 101: 537–59. (Scholar)
• Dolovich, S., 2004, ‘Legitimate Punishment in Liberal Democracy’, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 7: 307–442. (Scholar)
• Drumbl, M., 2007, Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Duff, R. A., 1986, Trials and Punishments, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1996, ‘Penal Communications: Recent Work in the Philosophy of Punishment’, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 20: 1–97. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, Punishment, Communication, and Community, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, Answering for Crime, Oxford: Hart Publishing. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, ‘Authority and responsibility in international criminal law’, in S. Besson and J. Tasioulas (eds.), Philosophy of International Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 589–604. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, ‘Retrieving Retributivism’, in M. D. White (ed.), Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy, New York: Oxford University Press, 3–24. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, ‘Relational Reasons and the Criminal Law’, in L. Green and B. Leiter (eds.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law (Volume 2), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 175–208. (Scholar)
• Duff, R. A., and D. Garland (eds.), 1994, A Reader on Punishment, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Duff, R. A., L. Farmer, S. E. Marshall, and V. Tadros, 2007, The Trial on Trial (Volume 3: Towards a Normative Theory of the Criminal Trial), Oxford: Hart Publishing. (Scholar)
• Duus-Otterström, G., forthcoming, ‘Fairness-Based Retributivism Reconsidered’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, first online 29 September 2015, doi:10.1007/s11572-015-9382-1 (Scholar)
• Ellis, A., 2003, ‘A Deterrence Theory of Punishment’, Philosophical Quarterly, 53: 337–51. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, The Philosophy of Punishment, Exeter: Imprint Academic. (Scholar)
• Falls, M. M., 1987, ‘Retribution, Reciprocity, and Respect for Persons’, Law and Philosophy, 6: 25–51. (Scholar)
• Farrell, D. M., 1985, ‘The Justification of General Deterrence’, Philosophical Review, 94: 367–94. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995, ‘Deterrence and the Just Distribution of Harm’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 12: 220–240. (Scholar)
• Feinberg, J., 1970, ‘The Expressive Function of Punishment’, in his Doing and Deserving, Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 95–118. (Scholar)
• –––, 1988, Harmless Wrongdoing (The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law: Volume IV), New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Finkelstein, C., 2011, ‘Punishment as Contract’, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 8: 319–340. (Scholar)
• Flanders, C., 2013, ‘Pardons and the theory of the “second best”’, Florida Law Review, 65: 1559–95. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, ‘Punishment, Liberalism, and Public Reason’, Criminal Justice Ethics, 36: 61–77. (Scholar)
• Frase, R., 2012, Just Sentencing: Principles and Procedures for a Workable System, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Garland, D., 2001, The Culture of Control, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Garvey, S., 1999, ‘Punishment as Atonement’, UCLA Law Review, 47: 1801–58. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, ‘Restorative Justice, Punishment, and Atonement’, Utah Law Review, 1: 303–17. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, ‘Lifting the Veil on Punishment’, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 7: 443–64. (Scholar)
• Golash, D., 2005, The Case against Punishment: Retribution, Crime Prevention, and the Law, New York: New York University Press. (Scholar)
• Goldman, A. H., 1982, ‘Toward a New Theory of Punishment’, Law and Philosophy, 1: 57–76. (Scholar)
• Hampton, J., 1984, ‘The Moral Education Theory of Punishment’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 13: 208–38. (Scholar)
• Hanna, N., 2008, ‘Say What? A Critique of Expressive Retributivism’, Law and Philosophy, 27: 123–150. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, ‘Taking the Consequences’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 8: 589–604. (Scholar)
• Hare, R. M., 1981, Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Methods and Point, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Hart, H. L. A., 1963, Law, Liberty and Morality, New York: Random House. (Scholar)
• –––, 1968, Punishment and Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Heffernan, W. C., and J. Kleinig (eds.), 2000, From Social Justice to Criminal Justice, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Hegel, G. W. F., 1821, The Philosophy of Right, trans. T. Knox, Oxford: Oxford University Press (1942). (Scholar)
• Holroyd, J., 2010, ‘Punishment and justice’, Social Theory and Practice, 36: 78–111. (Scholar)
• Honderich, T., 2005, Punishment: The Supposed Justifications Revisited, London: Pluto Publishing. (Scholar)
• Horder, J., 1992, Provocation and Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Hoskins, Z., 2011a, ‘Deterrent Punishment and Respect for Persons’, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 8: 369–384. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011b, ‘Fair Play, Political Obligation, and Punishment’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 5: 53–71. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, ‘Punishment, Contempt, and the Prospect of Moral Reform’, Criminal Justice Ethics, 32: 1–18. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014a, ‘Ex-Offender Restrictions’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 31: 33–48. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014b, ‘Punishing states and the spectre of guilt by association’, International Criminal Law Review, 14: 901–19. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016, ‘Collateral Restrictions’, in C. Flanders and Z. Hoskins (eds.), The New Philosophy of Criminal Law, London: Rowman Littlefield Intl., 249–65. (Scholar)
• –––, forthcoming, Beyond Punishment: A Normative Account of Collateral Restrictions on Offenders, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Hulsman, L., 1986, ‘Critical Criminology and the Concept of Crime’, Contemporary Crises, 10: 63–80. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991, ‘The Abolitionist Case: Alternative Crime Policies’, Israel Law Review, 25: 681–709. (Scholar)
• Husak, D., 1992, ‘Why Punish the Deserving?’ Noûs, 26: 447–64. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008, Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Imbresevic, M., 2010, ‘The Consent Solution to Punishment and the Explicit Denial Objection’, Theoria, 25: 211-24. (Scholar)
• Johnstone, G., 2002, Restorative Justice: Ideas, Values, Debates, Cullompton, Devon: Willan. (Scholar)
• Johnstone, G. (ed.), 2003, A Restorative Justice Reader, Cullompton, Devon: Willan. (Scholar)
• Journal of Applied Philosophy, 2005, Symposium on Disenfranchising Felons, Volume 22: 211–273. (Scholar)
• Kant, I., 1797, The Metaphysics of Morals, in Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Mary J. Gregor, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. (Scholar)
• Kaufman, W., 2008, ‘The Rise and Fall of the Mixed Theory of Punishment’, International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 22: 37–57. (Scholar)
• Kleinig, J., 1991, ‘Punishment and Moral Seriousness’, Israel Law Review 25: 401–21. (Scholar)
• Knowles, D., 1993, ‘Unjustified Retribution’, Israel Law Review, 27: 50–58. (Scholar)
• Lacey, N., 1988, State Punishment: Political Principles and Community Values, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• LaFollette, H., 2005, ‘Collateral consequences of punishment: civil penalties accompanying formal punishment’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 22: 241–61. (Scholar)
• Lang, A. F., 2007, ‘Crime and punishment: holding states accountable’, Ethics and International Affairs, 21: 239–57. (Scholar)
• Law and Philosophy, 2013, Special Issue on V. Tadros, The Ends of Harm, Volume 32: 1–157. (Scholar)
• Lewis, C. S., 1953, ‘The Humanitarian Theory of Punishment’, Res Judicatae, 6: 224; reprinted in W. Sellars and J. Hospers (eds.), Readings in Ethical Theory, 2nd edition, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts (1970), 646–50. (Scholar)
• Lipkin, R. J., 1988, ‘Punishment, Penance and Respect for Autonomy’, Social Theory and Practice, 14: 87–104. (Scholar)
• Lippke, R., 2001a, ‘Criminal Offenders and Rights Forfeiture’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 32: 78–89. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001b, ‘The Disenfranchisement of Felons’, Law and Philosophy, 20: 553–580. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, Rethinking Imprisonment, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, The Ethics of Plea Bargaining, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Loader, I., 2016, ‘In search of civic policing: recasting the “Peelian” principles’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 10: 427–40. (Scholar)
• London, R., 2011, Crime, Punishment, and Restorative Justice, Boulder: First Forum Press. (Scholar)
• Luban, D., 2010, ‘Fairness to rightness: jurisdiction, legality, and the legitimacy of international criminal law’, in S. Besson and J. Tasioulas (eds.), Philosophy of International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 569–88. (Scholar)
• Markel, D., 2011, ‘What Might Retributive Justice Be?’, in White 2011, 49–72. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, ‘Retributive Justice and the Demands of Democratic Citizenship’, Virginia Journal of Criminal Law, 1: 1–133. (Scholar)
• Marshall, S. E., and R. A. Duff, 1998, ‘Criminalization and Sharing Wrongs’, Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 11: 7–22. (Scholar)
• Mathiesen, T., 1990, Prison on Trial, London: Sage. (Scholar)
• Matravers, M., 2000, Justice and Punishment: The Rationale of Coercion, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, ‘Duff on Hard Treatment’, in R. Cruft, M. Kramer, M. Reiff (eds.), Crime, Punishment, and Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 68–83. (Scholar)
• Matthews, R. (ed.), 1988, Informal Justice, London: Sage. (Scholar)
• May, L., 2005, Crimes Against Humanity: A Normative Account, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• McCloskey, H. J., 1957, ‘An Examination of Restricted Utilitarianism’, The Philosophical Review, 66: 466–85. (Scholar)
• Menninger, K., 1968, The Crime of Punishment, New York: Viking Press. (Scholar)
• Montague, P., 1995, Punishment as Societal Defense, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. (Scholar)
• Moore, M. S., 1997, Placing Blame: A Theory of Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Morison, J., 1988, ‘Hart’s Excuses: Problems with a Compromise Theory of Punishment’, in P. Leith and P. Ingram (eds.), The Jurisprudence of Orthodoxy, London: Routledge, 117–46. (Scholar)
• Morris, C. W., 1991, ‘Punishment and Loss of Moral Standing’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 21: 53–79. (Scholar)
• Morris, H., 1968, ‘Persons and Punishment’, The Monist, 52: 475–501. (Scholar)
• –––, 1981, ‘A Paternalistic Theory of Punishment’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 18: 263–71. (Scholar)
• Morris, N., 1974, The Future of Imprisonment, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Morris, N., and M. Tonry, 1990, Between Prison and Probation: Intermediate Punishments in a Rational Sentencing System, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Murphy, J. G., 1973, ‘Marxism and Retribution’ Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2: 217–43. (Scholar)
• –––, 1985, ‘Retributivism, Moral Education and the Liberal State’, Criminal Justice Ethics, 4: 3–11. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, ‘Moral Epistemology, the Retributive Emotions, and the “Clumsy Moral Philosophy” of Jesus Christ’, in S. Bandes (ed.), The Passions of Law, New York: NYU Press, 149–67. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, Getting Even: Forgiveness and its Limits, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, Punishment and the Moral Emotions: Essays in Law, Morality, and Religion, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Murphy, J. G., and J. Coleman, 1984, The Philosophy of Law, Totowa, N. J.: Rowman & Littlefield. (Scholar)
• Murphy, J. G., and J. Hampton, 1988, Forgiveness and Mercy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Scholar)
• Narayan, U., 1993, ‘Appropriate Responses and Preventive Benefits: Justifying Censure and Hard Treatment in Legal Punishment’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 13: 166–82. (Scholar)
• Nino, C. S., 1983, ‘A Consensual Theory of Punishment’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12: 289–306. (Scholar)
• Pasternak, A., 2011, ‘The distributive effect of collective punishment’, in T. Isaacs and R. Vernon (eds.), Accountability for Collective Wrongdoing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 210–30. (Scholar)
• Pettit, P., 1997, ‘Republican Theory and Criminal Punishment’, Utilitas, 9: 59–79. (Scholar)
• Philips, M., 1986, ‘The Justification of Punishment and the Justification of Political Authority’, Law and Philosophy, 5: 393–416. (Scholar)
• Primoratz, I., 1989, ‘Punishment as Language’, Philosophy, 64: 187–205. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, Justifying Legal Punishment, 2nd edition, New Jersey: Humanities Press. (Scholar)
• Ramsay, P., 2011, ‘A Political Theory of Imprisonment for Public Protection’, in Tonry 2011, 130–154. (Scholar)
• Quinn, W., 1985, ‘The Right to Threaten and the Right to Punish’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 14: 327–73. (Scholar)
• Rawls, J., 1955, ‘Two Concepts of Rules’, The Philosophical Review, 64: 3–32. (Scholar)
• Ristroph, A., 2015, ‘Regulation or resistance? A counter-narrative of constitutional criminal procedure’, Boston University Law Review, 95: 1555–617. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016, ‘The conditions of legitimate punishment’, in C. Flanders and Z. Hoskins (eds.), The New Philosophy of Criminal Law, London: Rowman-Littlefield Intl, 79–95. (Scholar)
• Robinson, P., 1987, ‘A Sentencing System for the 21st Century?’, Texas Law Review, 66: 1–61. (Scholar)
• Sadurski, W., 1985, ‘Distributive Justice and the Theory of Punishment’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 5: 47–59. (Scholar)
• Scheid, D. E., 1980, ‘Note on Defining “Punishment”’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 10: 453–462. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990, ‘Davis and the Unfair-Advantage Theory of Punishment: A Critique’, Philosophical Topics, 18: 143–70. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995, ‘Davis, Unfair Advantage Theory and Criminal Desert’, Law and Philosophy, 14: 375–409. (Scholar)
• –––, 1997, ‘Constructing a Theory of Punishment, Desert, and the Distribution of Punishments’, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 10: 441–506. (Scholar)
• Shafer-Landau, R., 1991, ‘Can Punishment Morally Educate?’ Law and Philosophy, 10: 189–219. (Scholar)
• –––, 1996, ‘The Failure of Retributivism’, Philosophical Studies, 82: 289–316. (Scholar)
• Sher, G., 1987, Desert, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Sigler, M., 2011, ‘The Political Morality of the Eighth Amendment’, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 8: 403–30. (Scholar)
• Skillen, A. J., 1980, ‘How to Say Things with Walls’, Philosophy, 55: 509–23. (Scholar)
• Smart, J. J. C., 1973, ‘An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics’, in J. Smart and B. Williams, Utilitarianism: For and Against, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–74. (Scholar)
• Stephen, J. F., 1873, Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, ed. J. White, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1967). (Scholar)
• Stichter, M. K., 2010, ‘Rescuing Fair Play as a Justification of Punishment’, Res Publica, 16: 73–81. (Scholar)
• Tadros, V., 2011, The Ends of Harm: The Moral Foundations of Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Tanguay-Renaud, F., 2013, ‘Criminalizing the state’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 7: 255–84. (Scholar)
• Tasioulas, J., 2006, ‘Punishment and Repentance’, Philosophy, 81: 279–322. (Scholar)
• Ten, C. L., 1987, Crime, Guilt and Punishment,. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990, ‘Positive Retributivism’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 7: 194–208. (Scholar)
• Tonry, M., 1996, Sentencing Matters, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Tonry, M., 2012, Retributivism has a past: Has it a Future?, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Tonry, M. (ed.), 2011, Why Punish? How Much?, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Tudor, S. K., 2001, ‘Accepting One’s Punishment as Meaningful Suffering’, Law and Philosophy, 20: 581–604. (Scholar)
• von Hirsch, A., 1976, Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishments, New York: Hill & Wang. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990, ‘Proportionality in the Philosophy of Punishment: From “Why Punish?” to “How Much?”’ Criminal Law Forum, 1: 259–90. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993, Censure and Sanctions, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, ‘Punishment, Penance and the State’, in M. Matravers (ed.), Punishment and Political Theory, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 69–82. (Scholar)
• von Hirsch, A., and A. J. Ashworth, 1992, ‘Not Not Just Deserts: A Response to Braithwaite and Pettit’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 12: 83–98. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, Proportionate Sentencing, Oxford: Oxford University Press (Scholar)
• von Hirsch, A., A. J. Ashworth, and C. Shearing, 2005, ‘Restorative Justice: A “Making Amends” Model?’, in von Hirsch and Ashworth 2005, 110–30. (Scholar)
• von Hirsch, A., et al. (eds.), 2003, Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms?, Oxford: Hart Publishing. (Scholar)
• Walgrave, L. (ed.), 2002, Restorative Justice and the Law, Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing. (Scholar)
• Walker, N., 1980, Punishment, Danger and Stigma, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991, Why Punish?, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Wellman, C. H., 2009, ‘Rights and State Punishment’, The Journal of Philosophy, 106: 419–39. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, ‘The Rights Forfeiture Theory of Punishment’, Ethics, 122: 371–393. (Scholar)
• White, M.D. (ed.), 2011, Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Williams, B., 1976, Morality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Wilson, J. Q., 1983, Thinking about Crime, revised edition, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
• Wood, D., 2002, ‘Retribution, Crime Reduction, and the Justification of Punishment’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 22: 301–21. (Scholar)
• Wootton, B., 1963, Crime and the Criminal Law, London: Stevens. (Scholar)
• Zaibert, L., 2006, Punishment and Retribution, Aldershot: Ashgate. (Scholar)
• Zedner, L., 1994, ‘Reparation and Retribution: Are They Reconcilable?’ Modern Law Review, 57: 228–50. (Scholar)
• Zimmerman, M., 2011, The Immorality of Punishment, Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press. (Scholar)