Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Precedent and Analogy in Legal Reasoning" by Grant Lamond

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

  • Alexander, L., 1989, ‘Constrained by Precedent’, Southern California Law Review 63: 1–64 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1996a, ‘Precedent’ in A Companion to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, Patterson (ed), Oxford: Blackwell (Scholar)
  • –––, 1996b, ‘Bad Beginnings’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 145: 57–87 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1998, ‘The Banality of Legal Reasoning’, Notre Dame Law Review 73: 517–33 (Scholar)
  • Alexander, L. and Kress, K., 1995, ‘Against Legal Principles’ in A. Marmor (ed.), Law and Interpretation, Oxford (reprinted in (1997) 82 Iowa Law Review 739–86) (Scholar)
  • –––, 1997, ‘Reply to Our Critics’, Iowa Law Review 82: 923–941 (Scholar)
  • Becker, L., 1973, ‘Analogy in Legal Reasoning’, Ethics 83: 248–55 (Scholar)
  • Bell, J., 1997, ‘Comparing Precedent’ [book review of MacCormick & Summer (1997)], Cornell Law Review 82: 1243–1278 (Scholar)
  • Benditt, T.M., 1987, ‘The Rule of Precedent’ in Goldstein 1987 (Scholar)
  • Brewer, S., 1996, ‘Exemplary Reasoning: Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Rational Force of Legal Argument by Analogy’, Harvard Law Review 109: 923–1028 (Scholar)
  • Burton, S., 1995, An Introduction to Law and Legal Reasoning, 2nd ed., Boston: Little Brown (Scholar)
  • Chapman, B., 1994, ‘The Rational and the Reasonable: Social Choice Theory and Adjudication’, University of Chicago Law Review 61: 41–122 (Scholar)
  • Cross, R. and Harris, J., 1991, Precedent in English Law, 4th edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press (Scholar)
  • Dickson, J., 2001, ‘Interpretation and Coherence in Legal Reasoning’ in On-line Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Scholar)
  • Dworkin, R.M., 1975, ‘Hard Cases’ reprinted in Taking Rights Seriously, London (rev. ed. 1978): Duckworth (Scholar)
  • –––, 1978, ‘Reply to Critics’ in Taking Rights Seriously, London (rev. ed. 1978): Duckworth (Scholar)
  • –––, 1986, Law's Empire, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press (Scholar)
  • Eisenberg, M., 1988, The Nature of the Common Law, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press (Scholar)
  • Golding, M., 1984 [2001], Legal Reasoning, Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview
  • Goldstein, L., 1987, ed., Precedent in Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Goodhart, A.L., 1930, ‘Determining the Ratio Decidendi of a Case’, Yale Law Journal 40: 161–83 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1959, ‘The Ratio Decidendi of a Case’, Modern Law Review 22: 117–124 (Scholar)
  • Hart, H.L.A., 1994, The Concept of Law, 2nd ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Hurley, S., 1990, ‘Coherence, Hypothetical Cases, and Precedent’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 10: 221–251 (Scholar)
  • Kronman, A., 1990, ‘Precedent and Tradition’,Yale Law Journal 99: 1029–1068 (Scholar)
  • Lamond, G, 2005, ‘Do Precedents Create Rules?’, Legal Theory 15: 1–26 (Scholar)
  • Levenbook, B., 2000, ‘The Meaning of a Precedent’, Legal Theory 6: 185–240 (Scholar)
  • Levy, E.H., 1948, An Introduction to Legal Reasoning, Chicago: University of Chicago Press (Scholar)
  • Levin, J., 1983, ‘The Concept of the Judicial Decision’, Case Western Reserve Law Review 33: 208–239 (Scholar)
  • MacCormick, D.N., 1978 (1994), Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • –––, 1987a, ‘Why Cases Have Rationes and What These Are’, in Goldstein 1987 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1989, ‘Legal Reasoning and Interpretation’ in E. Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, London: Routledge (Scholar)
  • –––, 1998, ‘The Significance of Precedent’ Acta Juridica 174–187 (Scholar)
  • MacCormick, D.N. & Summers, R.S., 1997, (eds.), Interpreting Precedent, Aldershot: Dartmouth
  • Montrose, J.L., 1957, ‘Ratio Decidendi and the House of Lords’, Modern Law Review 20: 124–130 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1957, ‘The Ratio Decidendi of a Case’, Modern Law Review 20: 587–595 (Scholar)
  • Moore, M., 1987, ‘Precedent, Induction, and Ethical Generalization’, in Goldstein 1987 (Scholar)
  • Perry, S., 1987, ‘Judicial Obligation, Precedent and the Common Law’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 7: 215–257 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1997, ‘Two Models of Legal Principles’, Iowa Law Review 82: 787–819 (Scholar)
  • Posner, R.A., 1990, The Problems of Jurisprudence, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press (Scholar)
  • Postema, G., 2002, ‘Philosophy of the Common Law’, in J. Coleman & S. Shapiro (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press (Scholar)
  • Raz, J., 1979, ‘Law and Value in Adjudication’ in The Authority of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press (Scholar)
  • Sartorius, R., 1967) ‘The doctrine of precedent and the problem of relevance’, Archiv für Rechts und Sozialphilosophie 53: 343–365 (Scholar)
  • Schauer, F., 1987, ‘Precedent’, Stanford Law Review 39: 571–605 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1989, ‘Is the Common Law Law?’, California Law Review 77: 455–471 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1991, Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press (Scholar)
  • Sherwin, E., 1999, ‘A Defence of Analogical Reasoning in Law’, University of Chicago Law Review 66: 1179–1197 (Scholar)
  • Simmonds, N., 1984, The Decline of Juridical Reason, Manchester: Manchester University Press (Scholar)
  • Simpson, A.W.B., 1957, ‘The Ratio Decidendi of a Case’, Modern Law Review 20: 413–415 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1958, ‘The Ratio Decidendi of a Case’, Modern Law Review 21: 155–160 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1961, ‘The Ratio Decidendi of a Case and Doctrine of Precedent’ in A.G. Guest (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, Oxford: Oxford University Press (Scholar)
  • –––, 1973, ‘The Common Law and Legal Theory’ reprinted in Legal Theory and Legal History: Essays on the Common Law, 1987, Oxford: Hambledon Press (Scholar)
  • Stone, J., 1964, Legal System and Lawyers' Reasonings, London: Stevens (Scholar)
  • –––, 1985, Precedent and Law: Dynamics of Common Law Growth, Sydney: Butterworths (Scholar)
  • Sunstein, C., 1993, ‘On Analogical Reasoning’, Harvard Law Review 106: 741–91 (Scholar)
  • Wasserstrom, R.A., 1961, The Judicial Decision: Toward a Theory of Legal Justification, Stanford: Stanford University Press (Scholar)
  • White, J., 1996, ‘Analogical Reasoning’ in A Companion to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, Patterson (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell (Scholar)

Generated Sun May 21 07:57:14 2017