Primary Literature: Works by David Lewis

• 1966, “An Argument for the Identity Theory”, Journal of Philosophy, 63: 17–25; reprinted with additional material in Lewis 1983a: 99–107. (Scholar)
• 1968, “Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic”, Journal of Philosophy, 65: 113–126; reprinted in Lewis 1983a: 26–39. (Scholar)
• 1970, “How to Define Theoretical Terms”, Journal of Philosophy, 67: 427–446; reprinted in Lewis 1983a: 78–95. (Scholar)
• 1970 (with Stephanie Lewis), “Holes”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 48: 206–212; reprinted in Lewis 1983a: 3–9. (Scholar)
• 1971, “Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies”, Journal of Philosophy, 68: 203–11; reprinted in Lewis 1983a: 47–54. (Scholar)
• 1973a, “Causation”, Journal of Philosophy, 70: 556–67; reprinted in Lewis 1986a: 159–172. (Scholar)
• 1973b, Counterfactuals, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• 1979a, “Counterfactual Dependence and Time’s Arrow”, Noûs, 13: 455–476; reprinted with Postscripts in Lewis 1986a: 32–66. (Scholar)
• 1979b, “Scorekeeping in a Language Game”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8: 339–359; reprinted in Lewis 1983a: 233–249. (Scholar)
• 1980, “A Subjectivist’s Guide to Objective Chance”, in Lewis 1986a: 83–113. (Scholar)
• 1983a, Philosophical Papers, Volume I, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• 1983b, “New Work for a Theory of Universals”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 61: 343–377; reprinted in Lewis 1999: 8–55. (Scholar)
• 1983c, “Extrinsic properties”, Philosophical Studies, 44: 197–200; reprinted in Lewis 1999: 111–115. (Scholar)
• 1983d, “Postscripts to ‘Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic’” in Lewis 1983a: 39–46. (Scholar)
• 1983e, “Individuation by Acquaintance and by Stipulation”, The Philosophical Review, 92: 3–32. (Scholar)
• 1984, “Putnam’s paradox”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 62: 221–236; reprinted in Lewis 1999.
• 1986a, Philosophical Papers, Volume II, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• 1986b, “Postscripts to ‘Causation’”, in Lewis 1986a: 172–213. (Scholar)
• 1986c, “Causal Explanation”, in Lewis 1986a: 214–240. (Scholar)
• 1986d, “Events”, in Lewis 1986a: 241–269. (Scholar)
• 1986e, On the Plurality of Worlds, Oxford: Blackwell.
• 1986f, “Against Structural Universals”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64: 25–46; reprinted in Lewis 1999. (Scholar)
• 1988, “Rearrangement of particles: Reply to Lowe”, Analysis, 48: 65–72; reprinted in Lewis 1999. (Scholar)
• 1991, Parts of Classes, Oxford: Blackwell.
• 1993, “Many, but Almost One”, in Bacon, Campbell, and Reinhardt 1993: 23–38; reprinted in Lewis 1999: 164–182. (Scholar)
• 1994, “Humean Supervenience Debugged”, Mind, 103: 473–90. (Scholar)
• 1997, “Finkish Dispositions”, Philosophical Quarterly, 47: 143–158; reprinted in Lewis 1999: 133–151. (Scholar)
• 1998, Papers in Philosophical Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• 1999, Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• 2001, “Truthmaking and Difference-Making”, Noûs, 35: 602–615. (Scholar)
• 2003, “Things Qua Truthmakers”, Real Metaphysics: Essays in Honour of DH Mellor, 25–42. (Scholar)
• 2009, “Ramseyan Humility”, in Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism, edited by D. Braddon-Mitchell and R. Nola, 203–22, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. (Scholar)

Secondary Literature

• Armstrong, D. M., 1978a, Universals and Scientific Realism: Nominalism and Realism, Vol I., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Scholar)
• –––, 1978b, Universals and Scientific Realism: A Theory of Universals, Volume II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Scholar)
• –––, 1980, “Identity Through Time”, in Peter van Inwagen (ed.), Time and Cause: Essays Presented to Richard Taylor, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
• Bacon, Andrew, 2014, “Representing Counterparts”, The Australasian Journal of Logic, 11(2): 90–113. doi:10.26686/ajl.v11i2.2143 (Scholar)
• Bauer, Sebastian, and Wansing, Heinrich, 2002, “Consequence, Counterparts and Substitution:” Monist, 85(4): 483–497. doi:10.5840/monist200285434 (Scholar)
• Beebee, Helen, and Fisher, Anthony (eds.), 2020, Philosophical Letters of David K. Lewis, 2 volumes, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Braüner, Torben, and Ghilardi, Silvio, 2007, “First-Order Modal Logic”, in Handbook of Modal Logic, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 549–620. (Scholar)
• Bricker, Phillip, 1993, “The Fabric of Space: Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Distance Relations”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 18: 271–294. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, “David Lewis: On the Plurality of Worlds”, in Central Works of Philosophy (Volume 5 The Twentieth Century: Quine and After), Durham: Acumen Publishing, [Bricker 2006 preprint available online]. (Scholar)
• Bernstein, Sara, 2014, “Omissions as Possibilities”, Philosophical Studies, 167(1): 1–23. doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0229-0 (Scholar)
• Callender, Craig, 2001. “Humean Supervenience and Rotating Homogeneous Matter”, Mind, 110: 25–44. (Scholar)
• Campbell, Keith, 1990, Abstract Particulars, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Chandler, Hugh S., 1976, “Plantinga and the Contingently Possible”, Analysis, 36(2): 106–9. (Scholar)
• Chisholm, Roderick, 1967, “Identity Through Possible Worlds: Some Questions”, Noûs, 1: 1–8. (Scholar)
• Corsi, Giovanna, 2007, “Necessary for”, in Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Congress, London: College Publications. (Scholar)
• Cresswell, Max J., 2004, “Adequacy Conditions for Counterpart Theory”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 82: 28–41. (Scholar)
• Fara, Delia Graff, 2009, “Dear Haecceitism”, Erkenntnis, 70 (3): 285–97. doi:10.1007/s10670-008-9149-3 (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Possibility Relative to a Sortal”, in Karen Bennett & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics (Volume 7), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 2–40, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659081.003.0001 (Scholar)
• Fara, Michael, and Williamson, Timothy, 2005, “Counterparts and Actuality”, Mind, 114: 1–30. (Scholar)
• Feldman, Fred, 1971, “Counterparts”, Journal of Philosophy, 68: 406–9. (Scholar)
• Fitting, Melvin, 2004, “First-Order Intensional Logic”, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 127(1-3): 171–193. doi:10.1016/j.apal.2003.11.014 (Scholar)
• Forbes, Graeme, 1982, “Canonical Counterpart Theory”, Analysis, 42(1): 33–37. doi:10.1093/analys/42.1.33 (Scholar)
• –––, 1985, The Metaphysics of Modality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Ghilardi, Silvio, 1991, “Incompleteness Results in Kripke Semantics”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 56(2): 517–538. doi:10.2307/2274697 (Scholar)
• –––, 1992, “Quantified Extensions of Canonical Propositional Intermediate Logics”, Studia Logica, 51(2): 195–214. doi:10.1007/bf00370113 (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, “Substitution, Quantifiers and Identity in Modal Logic”, in E. Morscher & A. Hieke (eds.), New Essays in Free Logic, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 87–115. (Scholar)
• Ghilardi, Silvio, and Meloni, Giancarlo, 1988, “Modal and Tense Predicate Logic: Models in Presheaves and Categorical Conceptualization”, in Categorical Algebra and Its Applications, Francis Borceux (ed.), Berlin: Springer, pp. 130–142. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991, “Philosophical and Mathematical Investigations in First-Order Modal Logic”, in Problemi Fondazionali in Teoria Del Significato. Atti Del Convegno Di Pontignano, pp. 77–107, Firenze: Olsckhi. (Scholar)
• Haslanger, Sally, 1994, “Humean Supervenience and Enduring Things”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72: 339–359. (Scholar)
• Hawley, Katherine, 2001, How Things Persist, Vol. 69, Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Hazen, Allen P., 1977, The Foundations of Modal Logic, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pittsburgh. (Scholar)
• –––, 1979, “Counterpart-Theoretic Semantics for Modal Logic”, Journal of Philosophy, 76: 319–338. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Reflections on Counterpart Theory”, in Oxford Studies in Metaphysics (Volume 7), Karen Bennett and Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 41–64. (Scholar)
• Heller, Mark, 1998, “Property Counterparts in Ersatz Worlds”, The Journal of Philosophy, 95(6): 293–316. doi:10.2307/2564561 (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, “Anti-Essentialism and Counterpart Theory”, The Monist, 88(4): 600–618. doi:10.5840/monist200588428 (Scholar)
• Hintikka, Jaakko, 1962, Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
• Hughes, G. E., and Cresswell, Max J., 1996, A New Introduction to Modal Logic, London and New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Hunter, Graeme, and Seager, William, 1981, “The Discreet Charm of Counterpart Theory”, Analysis, 41(2): 73–76. (Scholar)
• Kaiserman, Alex, 2017. “Causes and Counterparts”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 95 (1): 17–28. doi:10.1080/00048402.2016.1157695 (Scholar)
• Kaplan, David, 1979. “Transworld Heir Lines”, in The Possible and the Actual, edited by Michael J. Loux. Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
• Karmo, Toomas, 1983. “Contingent Non-Identity”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 61 (2): 185–87. (Scholar)
• Kocurek, Alexander W., 2018, “Counteridenticals”, The Philosophical Review, 127(3): 323–369. doi:10.1215/00318108-6718783 (Scholar)
• Kracht, Markus, and Kutz, Oliver, 2002, “The Semantics of Modal Predicate Logic I. Counterpart Frames”, in Frank Wolter, Heinrich Wansing, Maarten de Rijke, & Michael Zakharayaschev (eds.), Advances in Modal Logic (Volume 3), World Scientific Publishing Company. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, “The Semantics of Modal Predicate Logic II. Modal Individuals Revisited”, in Reinhard Kahle (ed.), Intensionality, Los Angeles: A. K. Peters. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Logically Possible Worlds and Counterpart Semantics for Modal Logic”, in Dale Jacquette (ed.), Philosophy of Logic, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 943–995, . (Scholar)
• Kripke, Saul, 1971, “Identity and Necessity”, in Milton K. Munitz (ed.), Identity and Individuation, New York: New York University Press, pp. 135–164. (Scholar)
• –––, 1980, Naming and Necessity, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, “Quantified Modality and Essentialism”, Noûs, 51(2): 221–234. (Scholar)
• Kupffer, Manfred, 2010, Counterparts and Qualities, Ph.D. Thesis, Konstanz, Germany: Universität Konstanz. (Scholar)
• Kutz, Oliver, 2000, Kripke-Type Semantiken Für Die Modale Prädikatenlogik, Master’s Thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. (Scholar)
• Langton, Rae and David Lewis, 1998, “Defining ‘Intrinsic’”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58: 333–345; reprinted in Lewis 1999: 116–132. (Scholar)
• Maudlin, Tim, 2007a, “Suggestions from Physics for Deep Metaphysics”, in T. Maudlin 2007b: 78–103. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007b, The Metaphysics Within Physics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• McDonnell, Neil, 2016, “Events and Their Counterparts”, Philosophical Studies, 173 (5): 1291–1308. doi:10.1007/s11098-015-0547-5 (Scholar)
• Mondadori, Fabrizio, 1973, “Reference, Essentialism, and Modality in Leibniz’s Metaphysics”, Studia Leibnitiana, no. H. 1: 74–101. (Scholar)
• Ninan, Dilip, 2018, “Quantification and Epistemic Modality”, The Philosophical Review, 127(4): 433–485. doi:10.1215/00318108-6973010 (Scholar)
• Plantinga, Alvin, 1974. The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––. 1976. “Actualism and Possible Worlds”, Theoria, 42: 139–60. (Scholar)
• Rabern, Brian, 2018. “Binding Bound Variables in Epistemic Contexts”, Inquiry, published online 18 May 2018. doi:10.1080/0020174x.2018.1470568 (Scholar)
• Ramachandran, Murali, 1989, “An Alternative Translation Scheme for Counterpart Theory”, Analysis, 49: 131–141. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998, “Sortal Modal Logic and Counterpart Theory”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 76(4): 553–565. doi:10.1080/00048409812348671 (Scholar)
• –––, 2008, “Kripkean Counterpart Theory”, Polish Journal of Philosophy, 2: 89–106. (Scholar)
• –––, 2020. “Chisholm’s Modal Paradox(es) and Counterpart Theory 50 Years On”, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 29(4): 571–92. doi:10.12775/llp.2020.008 (Scholar)
• Robinson, Denis, 1982, “Re-Identifying Matter”, The Philosophical Review, 91: 317–41. (Scholar)
• Russell, J. S., 2013, “Actuality for Counterpart Theorists”, Mind, 122(485): 85–134. doi:10.1093/mind/fzt037 (Scholar)
• Salmon, Nathan, 1981. Reference and Essence. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Schurz, Gerhard, 1997, The Is-Ought Problem. A Study in Philosophical Logic (Volume 1), Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
• Schwarz, Wolfgang, 2012, “How Things Are Elsewhere: Adventures in Counterpart Semantics”, in G. Russell & G. Restall (eds.), New Waves in Philosophical Logic, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 8–29, . (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, “Counterpart Theory and the Paradox of Occasional Identity”, Mind, 123(492): 1057–1094. doi:10.1093/mind/fzu143 (Scholar)
• Shaw, James R., 2015. “De Re Belief and Cumming’s Puzzle”, Analytic Philosophy, 56 (1): 45–74. doi:10.1111/phib.12057 (Scholar)
• Sider, Theodore, 1996, “All the World’s a Stage”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74: 433–53. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, Four-Dimensionalism, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, “The Ersatz Pluriverse”, Journal of Philosophy, 99: 279–315. (Scholar)
• Stalnaker, Robert, 1986, “Counterparts and Identity”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 11(1): 121–40. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.1986.tb00490.x (Scholar)
• –––, 1994, “The Interaction of Modality with Quantification and Identity”, in W. Sinnott-Armstrong, D. Raffman, & N. Asher (eds.), Modality, Morality and Belief: Essays in Honor of Ruth Barcan Marcus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 12–28. (Scholar)
• –––, 1996, “Varieties of Supervenience”, Philosophical Perspectives, 10: Metaphysics: 221–241. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, Mere Possibilities, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Thomson, Judith, 1998. “The Statue and the Clay”, Noûs, 32: 149–173. (Scholar)
• Torza, Alessandro, 2011, “Models for Counterparts”, Axiomathes, 21(4): 553–579. doi:10.1007/s10516-010-9120-1 (Scholar)
• Quine, Willard van Orman, 1953, “Reference and Modality”, In From a Logical Point of View, 139–59. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• van Benthem, Johan, 1983, Modal Logic and Classical Logic, Naples: Bibliopolis. (Scholar)
• van Rooij, Robert, 2006, Attitudes and Changing Contexts, Ph.D. Dissertation, Heidelberg: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/1-4020-4177-2 (Scholar)
• Varzi, Achille C., 2020, “Counterpart Theories for Everyone”, Synthese, 197(11): 4691–4715. (Scholar)
• Wang, Jennifer, 2015, “Actualist Counterpart Theory”, The Journal of Philosophy, 112(8): 417–441. doi::10.5840/jphil2015112826. (Scholar)
• Williams, J. Robert G., 2008, “Gavagai Again”, Synthese, 164:235–259 (Scholar)
• Williams, Donald, 1953, “On the Elements of Being”, The Review of Metaphysics, 7: 3–192. (Scholar)
• Woodward, Richard, 2017, Ersatz Counterparts (Oxford Studies in Metaphysics), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Woollaston, Lin, 1994, “Counterpart Theory as a Semantics for Modal Logic”, Logique et Analyse, 147/148: 255–263. (Scholar)