Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Philosophy of Linguistics" by Barbara C. Scholz, Francis Jeffry Pelletier and Geoffrey K. Pullum

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

  • Adger, David, 2003, Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Akmajian, Adrian, Demers, Richard, Farmer, Ann, and Harnish, Robert, 2010, Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 6th ed. (Scholar)
  • Angluin, Dana, 1980, “Inductive inference of formal languages from positive data”, Information and Control, 45: 117–135. (Scholar)
  • Artstein, Ron and Poesio, Massimo, 2008, “Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics”, Computational Linguistics, 34: 555–596. (Scholar)
  • Atkinson, Quentin D. and Gray, Russell D., 2006, “How old is the Indo-European language family? Progress or more moths to the flame?”, in J. Clackson, P. Forster, and C. Renfrew, (eds.), Phylogenetic Methods and the Prehistory of Languages, Cambridge: MacDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 91–109. (Scholar)
  • Baldwin, Dare A. and Moses, L. J., 1994, “Early understanding of referential intent and attentional focus: Evidence from language and emotion”, in C. Lewis and P. Mitchell (eds.), Children's Early Understanding of Mind: Origins and Development, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 133–156. (Scholar)
  • Bard, Ellen, Robertson, David, and Sorace, Antonella, 1996, “Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability”, Language, 72(1): 32–68. (Scholar)
  • Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, Leda, and Tooby, J., 1992, The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Barlow, Michael and Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.), 2002, Usage-Based Models of Language, Stanford: CSLI Press. (Scholar)
  • Baroni, M., Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A., and Zanchetta, E., 2009, “The WaCky Wide Web: A collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora”, Journal of Language Resources and Evaluation, 43(3): 209–226. (Scholar)
  • Bates, Elizabeth, Elman, Jeffrey, Johnson, Mark, Karmiloff-Smith, Annette, Parisi, Domenico, and Plunkett, Kim, 1998, “Innateness and emergentism”, William Bechtel and George Graham (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 590–601. (Scholar)
  • Bickerton, Derek, 2007, “Language evolution: A brief guide for linguists”, Lingua, 117: 510–526. (Scholar)
  • Bloomfield, Leonard, 1914, An Introduction to the Study of Language, New York, NY: Henry Holt. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1933, Language, New York, NY: Henry Holt. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1939, Linguistic Aspects of Science (International Encyclopedia of Unified Science: Volume 1/Number 4), Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Boroditsky, Lera, Schmidt, L., and Phillips, W., 2003, “Sex, syntax, and semantics”, in Dedre Gentner and Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Cognition, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 61–80. (Scholar)
  • Bresnan, Joan, 2007, “A few lessons from typology”, Linguistic Typology, 11: 297–306.
  • Bresnan, Joan, Cueni, Anna, Nikitina, Tatiana, and Baayen, Harald, 2007, “Predicting the dative alternation”, in G. Boume, I. Kraemer, and J. Zwarts (eds.), Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, 69–94. (Scholar)
  • Bresnan, Joan and Ford, Marilyn, 2010, “Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English”, Language, 86: 168–213. (Scholar)
  • Brown, Roger and Hanlon, Camille, 1970, “Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech”, in Cognition and the Development of Language, J. R. Hayes, (ed.), New York: John Wiley and Sons, 11–54. (Scholar)
  • Brown, Roger and Lenneberg, Eric, 1954, “A study in language and cognition”, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49: 445–453.
  • Bybee, Joan and McClelland, J. L., 2005, “Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition”, The Linguistic Review, 22(2–4): 381–410. (Scholar)
  • Cheney, D. L. and Seyfarth, R. M., 1990, “The assessment by vervet monkeys of their own and another species’ alarm calls”, Animal Behavior, 40: 754–764. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005, “Constraints and preadaptations in the earliest stages of language evolution”, The Linguistic Review, 22: 135–159. (Scholar)
  • Chierchia, Gennaro, 1998, “Reference to kinds across languages”, Natural Language Semantics, 6: 339–405. (Scholar)
  • Chomsky, Noam, 1955, “The logical structure of linguistic theory”, Unpublished manuscript; revised in 1956 and distributed from MIT Library; published with some abridgement in 1975 by Plenum Press, New York. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1959, “On certain formal properties of grammars”, Information and Control, 1: 91–112. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1968, Language and Mind, New York: Harper and Row. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1969, “Linguistics and philosophy”, in Language and Philosophy: A Symposium, Sidney Hook, (ed.), New York: New York University Press, 51–94. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1975, Reflections on Language, New York, NY: Pantheon. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1977, Essays on Form and Interpretation, New York, NY: North-Holland. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Dordrecht: Foris. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1986, Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use, Westport, CT: Praeger. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1988, Language and Problems of Knowledge, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1992, “Explaining language use”, Philosophical Topics, 20: 205–231. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1995, “Language and nature”, Mind, 104: 1–61. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2003, “Reply to Millikan”, in Louise M. Antony and Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Chomsky and His Critics, Oxford: Blackwell, 308–315. (Scholar)
  • Chouinard, M. M. and Clark, E. V., 2003, “Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence”, Journal of Child Language, 30(3): 637–669. (Scholar)
  • Cowart, Wayne, 1997, Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. (Scholar)
  • Cowie, Fiona, 1999, What's Within? Nativism Reconsidered, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Culicover, Peter W. and Jackendoff, Ray S., 2010, “Quantitative methods alone are not enough: Response to Gibson and Fedorenko”, Trends in Cognitive Science, 14(6): 234–235. (Scholar)
  • den Dikken, Marcel, Bernstein, Judy, Tortora, Christina, and Zanuttini, Raffaella, 2007, “Data and grammar: Means and individuals”, Theoretical Linguistics, 33: 269–318. (Scholar)
  • Derwing, Bruce, 1973, Transformational Grammar as a Theory of Language Acquisition: A Study in the Empirical, Conceptual and Methodological Foundations of Contemporary Linguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Devitt, Michael, 2006, Ignorance of Language, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • Dummett, Michael, 1986, “‘A nice derangement of epitaphs’: Some comments on Davidson and Hacking”, in Truth and Interpretation, Ernest Lepore (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell, 459–476.
  • Dunbar, Robin, 1998, “Theory of mind and the evolution of language”, in James R. Hurford, Michael Studdert-Kennedy, and Chris Knight (eds.), Approaches to the Evolution of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 92–110. (Scholar)
  • Eckert, Penelope, 1989, Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School, New York, NY: Teachers College Press. (Scholar)
  • Edelman, Shimon and Christiansen, Morten, 2003, “How seriously should we take minimalist syntax?”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7: 60–61. (Scholar)
  • Elman, Jeffrey L., 1993, “Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small”, Cognition, 48: 71–99. (Scholar)
  • Ferreira, Fernanda, 2005, “Psycholinguistics, formal grammars, and cognitive science”, The Linguistic Review, 22: 365–380. (Scholar)
  • Fitch, W. Tecumseh, 2010, “Prolegomena to a future science of biolinguistics”, Biolinguistics, 3(4): 283–320. (Scholar)
  • Fodor, Janet Dean and Crowther, Carrie, 2002, “Understanding stimulus poverty arguments”, The Linguistic Review, 19(1–2): 105–146. (Scholar)
  • Fodor, Jerry A., 1983, The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Fodor, Jerry A. and Pylyshyn, Zenon W., 1988, “Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis”, Cognition, 28: 3–71. (Scholar)
  • Foraker, Stephani, Regier, Terry, Khetarpal, Naveen, Perfors, Amy, and Tenenbaum, Joshua, 2009, “Indirect evidence and the poverty of the stimulus: The case of anaphoric one”, Cognitive Science, 33: 287–300. (Scholar)
  • George, Alexander, 1989, “How not to become confused about linguistics”, in Reflections on Chomsky, Alexander George (ed.), Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 90–110. (Scholar)
  • Gibson, Edward and Fedorenko, Evelina, 2013, “The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research”, Language and Cognitive Processes, 28: 88–124. (See also the authors' summary in Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2010, Volume 14, pp. 233–234.) (Scholar)
  • Gold, E. Mark, 1967, “Language identification in the limit”, Information and Control, 10: 447–474. (Scholar)
  • Goldberg, Adele, 1995, Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Gray, Russell D., 2005, “Pushing the time barrier in the quest for language roots”, Science, 209: 307–308. (Scholar)
  • Gray, Russell D., Drummond, A. J., and Greenhill, S. J., 2009, “Phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement”, Science, 323: 479–483. (Scholar)
  • Gray, Russell D. and Jordan, Fiona M., 2000, “Language trees support the express-train sequence of Austronesian expansion”, Nature, 405: 1052–1055. Minor technical correction noted in Nature, 409: 743 (8 February 2001). (Scholar)
  • Greenhill, S. J., Atkinson, Q. D., Meade, A., and Gray, R. D., 2010, “The shape and tempo of language evolution”, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277: 2443–2450. (Scholar)
  • Harris, Zellig, 1957, “Co-occurrence and transformation in linguistic structure”, Language, 33: 283–340. (Scholar)
  • Hauser, Marc D., Chomsky, Noam, and Fitch, W. Tecumseh, 2002, “The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve”, Science, 298: 1569–1579. (Scholar)
  • Hockett, Charles F., 1968, The State of the Art, The Hague: Mouton. (Scholar)
  • Hoijer, Harry, 1954, “The Sapir Whorf hypothesis”, in Language in Culture, Harry Hoijer (ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 92–105. (Scholar)
  • Hopper, Paul and Thompson, Sandra, 1993, “Language universals, discourse pragmatics, and semantics”, Linguistic Sciences, 15: 357–376. (Scholar)
  • Horner, Victoria, Whiten, Andrew, Flynn, Emma, and de Waal, Frans B. M., 2006, “Faithful replication of foraging techniques along cultural transmission chains by chimpanzees and children”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103: 13878–13883. (Scholar)
  • Hurford, James R., 2000, “Social transmission favours linguistic generalization”, in J. R. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy, and C. Knight (eds.), The Evolutionary Emergence of Language: Social Function and the Origins of Linguistic Form, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 219–230. (Scholar)
  • Itkonen, Esa, 1978, Grammatical Theory and Metascience: A Critical Investigation into the Methodological and Philosophical Foundations of ‘Autonomous’ Linguistics, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. (Scholar)
  • Jackendoff, Ray S., 2002, Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Jacobson, Pauline, 1996, “The syntax/semantics interface in categorial grammar”, in Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Shalom Lappin (ed.), Cambridge, Massachusetts: Oxford University Press, 89–116. (Scholar)
  • Jain, Sanjay, Osherson, Daniel N., Royer, James S., and Sharma, Arun, 1999, Systems That Learn, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2nd ed. (Scholar)
  • Johnson, Kent, 2004, “Gold's theorem and cognitive science”, Philosophy of Science, 70(4): 571–592. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007, “On the systematicity of language and thought”, Journal of Philosophy, 101: 111–139. (Scholar)
  • Joos, Martin (ed.), 1966, Readings in Linguistics I: The Development of Descriptive Linguistics in America 1925–56, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, fourth ed. (Scholar)
  • Karlsson, Fred, 2007, “Constraints on multiple center-embedding of clauses”, Journal of Linguistics, 43(2): 365–392. (Scholar)
  • Katz, Jerrold J., 1980, “Chomsky on meaning”, Language, 56(1): 1–41. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1981, Language and Other Abstract Objects, Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
  • ––– (ed.), 1985, Philosophy of Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1998, Realistic Rationalism, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Kay, Paul and Regier, Terry, 2006, “Language, thought and color: Recent developments”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2): 51–53. (Scholar)
  • Kay, Paul, Berlin, Brent, Maffi, Luisa, Merrifield, William, 2011, The World Color Survey, Stanford, Center for the Study of Language and Information. (Scholar)
  • Kirby, Simon, 2001, “Spontaneous evolution of linguistic structure: An iterated learning model of the emergence of regularity and irregularity”, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 5(2): 102–110. (Scholar)
  • Kirby, Simon, Cornish, Hannah, and Smith, Kenny, 2008, “Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(31): 10681–10686. (Scholar)
  • Kousta, S. T., Vinson, D. P., and Vigliocco, G., 2008, “Investigating linguistic relativity through bilingualism: The case of grammatical gender”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(4): 843–858. (Scholar)
  • Labov, William, 1966, The Social Stratification of English in New York City, Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. 2nd edition Cambridge University Press, 2006. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1975, “Empirical foundations of linguistic theory”, in The Scope of American Linguistics, R. Austerlitz (ed.), Lisse: Peter de Ridder, 77–133. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1996, “When intuitions fail”, in L. McNair, K. Singer, L. Dobrin, and M. Aucon (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Theory and Data in Linguistics, Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 77–106. (Scholar)
  • Lappin, Shalom and Shieber, Stuart, 2007, “Machine learning theory and practice as a source of insight into universal grammar”, Journal of Linguistics, 43: 393–427. (Scholar)
  • Larson, Richard, 1988, “On the double object construction”, Linguistic Inquiry, 19: 335–391. (Scholar)
  • Laurence, Stephen and Margolis, Eric, 2001, “The poverty of the stimulus argument”, British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 52(2): 217–276. (Scholar)
  • Levelt, W. J. M., 2008, An Introduction to the Theory of Formal Languages and Automata, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Scholar)
  • Lewis, David, 1969, Convention: A Philosophical Study, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Li, P. and Gleitman, Lila, 2002, “Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning”, Cognition, 83: 265–294. (Scholar)
  • Lucy, John, 1996, “The scope of linguistic relativity: An analysis and review of empirical research”, in J. Gumperz and S. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 37–69. (Scholar)
  • MacWhinney, Brian, 2005, “The emergence of grammar from perspective taking”, in D. Pecher and R. A. Zwaan (eds.), The Grounding of Cognition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 198–223. (Scholar)
  • Martinet, André, 1960, Elements of General Linguistics, London: Faber. (Scholar)
  • Matthews, Robert, 1984, “The plausibility of rationalism”, Journal of Philosophy, 81: 492–515. Reprinted in Matthews and Demopoulos (1989), 51–75. (Scholar)
  • Matthews, Robert, 2007, “The case for linguistic nativism”, in Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science, Robert J. Stainton, (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell, 81–96. (Scholar)
  • Matthews, Robert and Demopoulos, William (eds.), 1989, Learnability and Language Acquisition, Dordrecht: Foris. (Scholar)
  • Millikan, Ruth Garrett, 2003, “In defense of public language”, in L. M. Antony and N. Hornstein (eds.), Chomsky and His Critics, Oxford: Blackwell, 215–237. (Scholar)
  • Montague, Richard, 1974, Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, New Haven: Yale University Press. Edited by R. Thomason. (Scholar)
  • Morris, Charles, 1938, Foundations of the Theory of Signs, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Napoli, Donna Jo, 1996, Linguistics: An Introduction, New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Newmeyer, Frederick J., 1986, Linguistic Theory in America, New York: Academic Press, 2nd ed. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1991, “Functional explanation in linguistics and the origins of language”, Language and Communication, 11(1–2): 3–28. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1998, “On the supposed ‘counterfunctionality’ of universal grammar: Some evolutionary implications”, in J. R. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy, and C. Knight (eds.), Approaches to the Evolution of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 305–319. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007, “Commentary on Sam Featherston, ‘Data in generative grammar: The stick and the carrot”’, Theoretical Linguistics, 33: 395–399. (Scholar)
  • Newport, Elissa L., 1988, “Constraints on learning and their role in language acquisition: Studies of the acquisition of American sign language”, Language Sciences, 10: 147–172. (Scholar)
  • O'Grady, William, 2008, “The emergentist program”, Lingua, 118: 447–464. (Scholar)
  • Osherson, Daniel N., Stob, Michael, and Weinstein, Scott, 1984, “Learning theory and natural language”, Cognition, 17(1): 1–28. Reprinted in Matthews and Demopoulos (1989), 19–50. (Scholar)
  • Partee, Barbara, 1975, “Montague grammar and transformational grammar”, Linguistic Inquiry, 6: 203–300. (Scholar)
  • Pelletier, Francis Jeffry, 1991, “The principle of semantic compositionality”, Topoi, 13: 11–24; reprinted, with additions, in S. Davis and B. Gillon, Semantics: A Reader, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 133–156. (Scholar)
  • Penn, Julia, 1972, Linguistic Relativity versus Innate Ideas: The Origins of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis in German Thought, Paris: Mouton. (Scholar)
  • Phillips, Colin, 2010, “Should we impeach armchair linguists?”, in S. Iwasaki, H. Hoji, P. Clancy, and S.-O. Sohn (eds.), Japanese-Korean Linguistics 17, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 49–64. (Scholar)
  • Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo, 1989, “Evolution, selection, and cognition: From ‘learning’ to parameter setting in biology and the study of language”, Cognition, 31: 1–44. (Scholar)
  • Pinker, Steven, 1994, The Language Instinct: The New Science of Language and Mind, New York, NY: Morrow Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007, The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature, New York, NY: Viking Penguin. (Scholar)
  • Pinker, Steven and Bloom, Paul, 1990, “Natural language and natural selection”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13: 707–726. (Scholar)
  • Pinker, Steven and Jackendoff, Ray S., 2005, “The faculty of language: What's special about it?”, Cognition, 95: 201–236. (Scholar)
  • Power, Camilla, 1998, “‘Old wives’ tales’: The gossip hypothesis and the reliability of cheap signals”, in J. R. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy, and C. Knight (eds.), Approaches to the Evolution of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 111–129. (Scholar)
  • Prinz, Jesse, 2002, Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Pullum, Geoffrey K., 1983, “How many possible human languages are there?”, Linguistic Inquiry, 14: 447–467. (Scholar)
  • Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Scholz, Barbara C., 1997, “Theoretical linguistics and the ontology of linguistic structure”, in T. Haukioja, M.-L. Helasvuo, and M. Miestamo, (eds.), SKY 1997: 1997 Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland, Turku: Suomen kielitieteelinen yhdistys [Linguistic Association of Finland], 25–47. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002, “Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments”, The Linguistic Review, 19: 9–50. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007, “ Systematicity and Natural Language Syntax”, Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 21: 375–402. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2010, “Recursion and the infinitude claim”, in Recursion in Human Language, Harry van der Hulst (ed.), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, no. 104 in Studies in Generative Grammar, 113–138. (Scholar)
  • Putnam, Hilary, 1963, “Probability and confirmation”, in The Voice of America Forum Lectures (Philosophy of Science Series, No. 10), Hilary Putnam, (ed.), Washington, D.C.: United States Information Agency. Reprinted in Mathematics, Matter and Method, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975, 293–304. (Scholar)
  • Quine, Willard Van Orman, 1972, “Linguistics and philosophy”, in Language and Philosophy: A Symposium, Sidney Hook (ed.), New York: New York University Press, 95–98. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1987, Quiddities: An Intermittently Philosophical Dictionary, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Rohde, D. L. T. and Plaut, D. C., 1999, “Language acquisition in the absence of explicit negative evidence: How important is starting small?”, Cognition, 72: 67–109. (Scholar)
  • Roland, Doug and Jurafsky, Daniel, 2002, “Verb sense and verb subcategorization probabilities”, in S. Stevenson and P. Merlo (eds.), The Lexical Basis of Sentence Processing: Formal, Computational, and Experimental Issues, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 325–346. (Scholar)
  • Sampson, Geoffrey, 2001, Empirical Linguistics, London: Continuum Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005, The Language Instinct Debate, London: Continuum Press. (Scholar)
  • Sapir, Edward, 1921, Language, New York, NY: Harcourt. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1929, “The status of linguistics as a science”, Language, 5: 207–214. Reprinted in David Mandelbaum (ed.), Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language Culture and Personality, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1968, 160–166. (Scholar)
  • Saussure, Ferdinand de, 1916, Cours de linguistique générale, Paris and Lausanne: Payot. Edited and published after Saussure's death by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye with the collaboration of Albert Riedlinger. English translation by Roy Harris (1998) in Ferinand de Saussure Course in General Linguistics, New York: Open Court. (Scholar)
  • Scholz, Barbara C. and Pullum, Geoffrey K., 2002, “Searching for arguments to support linguistic nativism”, The Linguistic Review, 19: 185–223. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2006, “Irrational nativist exuberance”, in Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science, Robert J. Stainton (ed.), Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 59–80. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007, “Tracking the origins of generative grammar”, Journal of Linguistics, 43: 701–723. (Scholar)
  • Schütze, Carson, 1996, The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Seuren, Pieter A. M., 1998, Western Linguistics: An Historical Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
  • Shinohara, T., 1990, “Inductive inference of monotonic formal systems from positive data”, in S. Arikawa, S. Goto, S. Ohsuga, and T. Yokomori (eds.), Algorithmic Learning Theory, Berlin: Springer, 339–351. (Scholar)
  • Slobin, Dan, 1996, “From thought and language to thinking for speaking”, in J. Gumperz and S. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 70–96. (Scholar)
  • Soames, Scott, 1984, “Linguistics and psychology”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 7: 155–179. (Scholar)
  • Sprouse, Jon, 2011, “A test of the cognitive assumptions of magnitude estimation: Commutativity does not hold for acceptability judgments”, Language, 87(2): 274–288. (Scholar)
  • Stainton, Robert J. (ed.), 2006, Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
  • Steedman, Mark, 2000, The Syntactic Process, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Szabolcsi, Anna, 1997, “Strategies for scope taking”, in Ways of Scope Taking, Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer, 109–155. (Scholar)
  • Thierry, Guillaume, Athanasopulous, Panos, Wiggett, Alison, Dering, Benjamin, and Kuipers, Jan-Rouke, 2009, “Unconscious effects of language-specific terminology on pre-attentive color perception”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(11): 4567–4570. (Scholar)
  • Tomalin, Marcus, 2006, Linguistics and the Formal Sciences: The Origins of Generative Grammar, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Tomasello, Michael, 1998, “Introduction”, in The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Michael Tomasello (ed.), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2003, Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Tomlin, Russell S., 1990, “Functionalism in second language acquisition”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12: 155–177. (Scholar)
  • Valian, Virginia, 1982, “Psycholinguistic experiment and linguistic intuition”, in T. W. Simon and R. J. Scholes (eds.), Language, Mind, and Brain, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 179–188. (Scholar)
  • Van Valin, Robert, 1991, “Functionalist linguistic theory and language acquisition”, First Language, 11: 7–40. (Scholar)
  • Voegelin, Carl F. and Harris, Zellig S., 1951, “Methods for determining intelligibility among dialects of natural languages”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 95(3): 322–329. (Scholar)
  • Wasow, Thomas and Arnold, Jennifer, 2005, “Intuitions in linguistic argumentation”, Lingua, 115: 1481–1496. (Scholar)
  • Weinreich, Max, 1945, “Der yivo un di problemen fun undzer tsayt”, Yivo Bleter, 25: 3–18. (Scholar)
  • Weskott, Thomas and Fanselow, Gisbert, 2011, “On the informativity of different measures of linguistic acceptability”, Language, 87(2): 249–273. (Scholar)
  • Wexler, Kenneth and Culicover, Peter, 1980, Formal Principles of Language Acquisition, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Wexler, Kenneth and Hamburger, Henry, 1973, “On the insufficiency of surface data for the learning of transformational languages”, in J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language, Dordrecht: Reidel, 16–179. (Scholar)
  • Whorf, Benjamin Lee, 1956, Language, Thought and Reality, Cambridge University Press: MIT Press. Edited by John B. Carroll. (Scholar)
  • Worden, Robert, 1998, “The evolution of language from social intelligence”, in J. R. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy, and C. Knight (eds.), Approaches to the Evolution of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 148–166. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Mar 26 07:59:25 2017