Select Primary Sources

• de Beer, E.S. (ed), 1979, The Correspondence of John Locke, volume 4, Letters 1242–1701, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, 1704 [1981], New Essays on Human Understanding, edited by Jonathan Bennett and Peter Remnant, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. (Scholar)
• Locke, John, 1690, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, edited by Peter H. Nidditch, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975. (Scholar)

Select Secondary Sources

• Ayer, A.J., 1954, “Freedom and Necessity”, in Philosophical Essays, London: Macmillan, pp. 271–284. (Scholar)
• Chappell, Vere, 1994, “Locke on the Freedom of the Will”, in Locke’s Philosophy: Content and Context, edited by G.A.J. Rogers, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 101–121. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “Review of Liberty Worth the Name, by Gideon Yaffe”, Mind, 113: 420–424. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Power in Locke’s Essay”, in The Cambridge Companion to Locke’s “Essay Concerning Human Understanding”, edited by Lex Newman, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 130–156. (Scholar)
• Chisholm, Roderick, 1966, “Freedom and Action”, in Freedom and Determinism, edited by Keith Lehrer, New York: Random House, pp. 11–44. (Scholar)
• Davidson, Donald, 1980, “Freedom to Act”, in Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 63–81. (Scholar)
• Davidson, Jack D., 2003, “Locke’s Finely Spun Liberty”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 33: 203–227. (Scholar)
• Dicker, Georges, 2019, Locke on Knowledge and Reality: A Commentary on An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, New York: Oxford University Press, Chapter 9. (Scholar)
• Garrett, Don, 2015, “Liberty and Suspension in Locke’s Theory of the Will”, in A Companion to Locke, edited by Matthew Stuart, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 260–278. (Scholar)
• Glauser, Richard, 2003, “Thinking and Willing in Locke’s Theory of Human Freedom”, Dialogue, 42: 695–724. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, ‘Locke and the Problem of Weakness of the Will’, in Mind, Values, and Metaphysics, Anne Reboul (ed.), Cham: Springer, pp. 483–499. (Scholar)
• Hoffman, Paul, 2005, “Locke on the Locked Room”, Locke Studies, 5: 57–73. (Scholar)
• Jolley, Nicholas, 1999, Locke: His Philosophical Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Leisinger, Matthew A., 2017, ‘Locke’s Arguments Against the Freedom to Will’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 25: 642–662. (Scholar)
• Locke, Don, 1975, “Three Concepts of Free Action, Part 1”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplemental Volume), 49: 95–112. (Scholar)
• LoLordo, Antonia, 2012, Locke’s Moral Man, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Lowe, E.J., 1986, “Necessity and the Will in Locke’s Theory of Action”, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 3: 149–163. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995, Locke on Human Understanding, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “Locke: Compatibilist Event-Causalist or Libertarian Substance-Causalist?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 48: 688–701. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, Locke, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Magri, Tito, 2000, “Locke, Suspension of Desire, and the Remote Good”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 8: 55–70. (Scholar)
• Mill, John Stuart, 1974 [1843], System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive, in Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. 7, edited by J.M. Robson, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Scholar)
• Moauro, Leonardo, and Rickless, Samuel C., 2019, ‘Does Locke Have an Akrasia Problem?’, Journal of Modern Philosophy, 1: 9. doi:10.32881/jomp.39 (Scholar)
• Moore, G.E., 1912, Ethics, London: Williams and Norgate. (Scholar)
• O’Higgins, J., 1976, “Introduction” and “Notes”, in Determinism and Freewill: Anthony Collins’ A Philosophical Inquiry Concerning Human Liberty, edited by J. O’Higgins, The Hague: Nijhoff, pp. 1–45 and 115–124. (Scholar)
• Rickless, Samuel C., 2000, “Locke on the Freedom to Will”, Locke Newsletter (now Locke Studies), 31: 43–67. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, “Review of Liberty Worth the Name: Locke on Free Agency, by Gideon Yaffe”, Locke Studies, 1: 235–255. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, Locke, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Ryle, Gilbert, 1949, The Concept of Mind, London: Hutchinson. (Scholar)
• Schaffer, Jonathan, 2003, “Overdetermining Causes”, Philosophical Studies, 114: 23–45. (Scholar)
• Schouls, Peter, 1992, Reasoned Freedom: John Locke and Enlightenment, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
• Stuart, Matthew, 2013, Locke’s Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Taylor, Richard, 1966, Action and Purpose, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
• Vailati, Ezio, 1990, ‘Leibniz on Locke on Weakness of Will’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 28: 213–228. (Scholar)
• Walsh, Julie, 2014, “Locke and the Power to Suspend Desire”, Locke Studies, 14: 121–157. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018, ‘Locke’s Last Word on Freedom: Correspondence with Limborch’, Res Philosophica, 95: 637–661. (Scholar)
• Yaffe, Gideon, 2000, Liberty Worth the Name: Locke on Free Agency, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Yolton, John W., 1970, Locke and the Compass of Human Understanding, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)

Additional Secondary Sources

• Broad, Jacqueline, 2006, “A Woman’s Influence? John Locke and Damaris Masham on Moral Accountability”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 67: 489–510. (Scholar)
• Chappell, Vere, 1994, “Locke on the Intellectual Basis of Sin”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 32: 197–207. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998, “Locke on the Suspension of Desire”, Locke Newsletter (now Locke Studies), 29: 23–38. (Scholar)
• Colman, John, 1983, John Locke’s Moral Philosophy, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. (Scholar)
• Corneanu, Sorana, 2011, Regimens of the Mind: Boyle, Locke, and the Early Modern Cultura Animi Tradition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Darwall, Stephen, 1995, The British Moralists and the Internal ‘Ought’, 1640–1740, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Glauser, Richard, 2009, “Liberté, Compatibilisme et Agnosticisme chez Locke”, Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 107: 675–697. (Scholar)
• Harris, James, 2005, Of Liberty and Necessity: The Free Will Debate in Eighteenth-Century British Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• LoLordo, Antonia, 2013, “Reply to Rickless”, Locke Studies, 13: 55–64. (Scholar)
• Marko, Jonathan S., 2017, ‘Why Locke’s Of Power Is Not a Metaphysical Pronouncement: Locke’s Response to Molyneux’s Critique’, Philosophy and Theology: Marquette University Quarterly, 29: 41–68. (Scholar)
• Rickless, Samuel C., 2013, “Locke on Active Power, Freedom, and Moral Agency”, Locke Studies, 13: 33–54. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, ‘Will and Motivation’, in The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century, Peter R. Anstey (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 393–414. (Scholar)
• Schindler, D. C., 2017, Freedom from Reality: The Diabolical Character of Modern Liberty, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, Chapter 1. (Scholar)
• Sleigh, Robert, Vere Chappell, and Michael Della Rocca, 1998, ‘Determinism and Human Freedom’, in The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Volume 2: 1195–1278. (Scholar)
• Walsh, Julie, 2010, “‘Things’ for ‘Actions’: Locke’s Mistake in ‘Of Power’”, Locke Studies, 10: 85–94. (Scholar)
• Wolfe, Charles T, 2009, “Locke’s Compatibilism: Suspension of Desire of Suspension of Determinism?” in Action, Ethics and Responsibility, edited by Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O’Rourke, and Harry Silverstein, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 109–126. (Scholar)
• Yaffe, Gideon, 2001, “Locke on Refraining, Suspending, and the Freedom to Will”, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 18: 373–391. (Scholar)