Primary Literature

• Boyle, R., 1666, The Origine of Formes and Qualities (According to the Corpuscular Philosophy), Oxford: H. Hall. (Scholar)
• Charleton, W., 1654, Physioliogia Epicuro-Gassendo-Charltoniana, or a Fabrick of Science Natural upon a Hypothesis of Atoms. Printed by Tho: Newcomb, for Thomas Heath. (Scholar)
• Galileo, 1623, “The Assayer,” in M.R. Matthews (ed.), The Scientific Background to Modern Philosophy: Selected Readings, Indianapolis: Hackett, 1989. (Scholar)
• Locke, J., 1975 [1700], An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, P. H. Nidditch (ed.), based on the fourth edition, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1824, The Works of John Locke, in nine volumes, 12^th edition, London: C. and J. Rivington. (Scholar)
• Newton, I., 1999 [1726], The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, trans. I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
• Newton, I., 2004, Newton: Philosophical Writings, ed. Andrew Janiak, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. (Scholar)

Secondary Literature

• Anstey, Peter, 2011, John Locke and Natural Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Atherton, M., 1991, “Corpuscles, Mechanism, and Essentialism in Berkeley and Locke,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 29 (1): 47–67. (Scholar)
• Ayers, M.R., 1975, “The Ideas of Power and Substance in Locke’s Philosophy,” Philosophical Quarterly, 25 (98): 1–27. (Scholar)
• –––, 1981, “Mechanism, Superaddition, and the Proof of God’s Existence in Locke’s Essay,” The Philosophical Review, 90 (2): 210–251. (Scholar)
• Clarke, D.M., 1992, “Descartes’ philosophy of science,” in J. Cottingham (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Descartes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 258–285. (Scholar)
• Cohen, I.B., 2002, “Newton’s concepts of force and mass, with notes on the Laws of Motion,” in I. Bernard Cohen and George E. Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 57–84. (Scholar)
• Connolly, P.J., 2015, “Lockean Superaddition and Lockean Humility,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part A), 51: 53–61. (Scholar)
• Curley, E.M., 1972, “Locke, Boyle, and the Distinction between Primary and Secondary Qualities,” The Philosophical Review, 81 (4): 438–464. (Scholar)
• De Pierris, G., 2006, “Hume and Locke on Scientific Methodology: The Newtonian Legacy,” Hume Studies, 32(2): 277–330. (Scholar)
• Dear, P., 1995, Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Di Biase, G., 2016, “Physica in John Locke’s Adversaria and Classification of the Branches of Knowledge,” Locke Studies, 16: 69–165. doi:10.5206/ls.2016.654 (Scholar)
• Domski, M., 2012, “Locke’s Qualified Embrace of Newton’s Principia,” in Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays, ed. A. Janiak, and E. Schliesser, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Downing, L., 1997, “Locke’s Newtonianism and Lockean Newtonianism,” Perspectives on Science, 5(3): 285–310. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998, “The Status of Mechanism in Locke’s Essay,” The Philosophical Review, 107 (3): 381–414. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Locke’s Ontology,” in L. Newman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Locke’s Essay, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 352–380. (Scholar)
• Duncan, S., 2021, “Locke, God, and Materialism,” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, 10: 101–131. (Scholar)
• Gibson, J., 1960, Locke’s Theory of Knowledge and its Historical Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Gorham, G., 2011, “How Newton Solved the Mind-Body Problem,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 28: 21–44. (Scholar)
• Gorham, G. and Slowik, E., 2014, “Locke and Newton on Space and Time and their Sensible Measures,” in Z. Biener and E. Schliesser (eds.), Newton and Empiricism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Gorham, G., 2020, “Locke on Space, Time, and God,” Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 7(7), 07 November 2020. doi:10.3998/ergo.12405314.0007.007 (Scholar)
• Henry, J., 1994, “‘Pray do not ascribe that notion to me’: God and Newton’s Gravity,” in J.E. Force and R. H. Popkin (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scripture: Recent Essays on Natural Philosophy, Theology and Biblical Criticism in the Netherlands of Spinoza’s Time and the British Isles of Newton’s Time, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 123–147. (Scholar)
• Hill, J., 2004, “Locke’s Account of Cohesion and its Philosophical Significance,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 12 (4): 611 – 630. (Scholar)
• Jacovides, Michael, 2017, Locke’s Image of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Janiak, A., 2008, Newton as Philosopher, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Jardine, N., 1991, “Demonstration, Dialectic, and Rhetoric, in Galileo’s Dialogue,” in D.R. Kelley and R.H.Popkin, Shapes of Knowledge from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, Berlin: Springer, pp. 101–121. (Scholar)
• Jolley, N., 2002, Locke: His Philosophical Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Jones, J.-E., 2023, “Locke on Real Essence”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2023 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/real-essence/>. (Scholar)
• Kochiras, H., 2011. “Gravity’s Cause and Substance Counting: Contextualizing the Problems,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 42(1): 167–184. (Scholar)
• –––, 2021, “Newton’s Matter Theory,” in E. Schliesser and C. Smeenk, The Oxford Handbook of Newton, 12 November 2021. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199930418.013.23 (Scholar)
• Koyre, A., 1965, Newtonian Studies, London: Chapman & Hall. (Scholar)
• Langton, R., 2000, “Locke’s Relations and God’s Good Pleasure,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 100: 75–91. (Scholar)
• Lu-Adler, H., 2021, “Locke on Scientific Methodology,” in J. Gordon-Roth and S. Weinberg, The Lockean Mind, London: Routledge, pp. 277–289. (Scholar)
• Mandelbaum, M., 1964, Philosophy, Science, and Sense Perception, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press. (Scholar)
• McCann, E., 1994: “Locke’s Philosophy of Body,” in V. Chapell (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Locke, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–88. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, “John Locke,” in S. Nadler, A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. (Scholar)
• McGuire, J.E., 1970, “Atoms and the Analogy of Nature,” reprinted in J.E. McGuire, Tradition and Innovation: Newton’s Metaphysics of Nature (The University of Western Ontario Series in the Philosophy of Science), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1995. (Scholar)
• Nuovo, V., 2017, John Locke: The Philosopher as Christian Virtuoso, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Osler, M.J., 1998, “Mixing Metaphors: Science and religion or natural philosophy and theology in early modern Europe,” History of Science, 36: 91–113. (Scholar)
• Osler, M.J., 1970, “John Locke and the Changing Ideal of Scientific Knowledge,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 31 (1): 3–16. (Scholar)
• Ott, Walter, 2009, Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Palmieri, P., 1998 “Re-examining Galileo’s Theory of Tides,” Archiv. Hist. Exact Sci. 53 (1998) 223–375. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “A phenomenology of Galileo’s experiments with pendulums,”British Journal for the History of Science, 42(4): 479–513, December 2009. (Scholar)
• Park, K. and Daston, L., 2006, “Introduction: The Age of the New,” in K. Park and L. Daston (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science (Volume 3: Early Modern Science), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Priselac, Matthew, 2017, Locke’s Science of Knowledge, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Rogers, G.A.J., 1978, “Locke’s Essay and Newton’s Principia,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 39(20): 217–232. (Scholar)
• –––, 1982, “The System of Locke and Newton,” in Z. Bechler (ed.), Contemporary Newtonian Research, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 215–238. (Scholar)
• Roux, S., 2013, “An Empire Divided: French Natural Philosophy (1670–1690),” in Garber and Roux (eds.), The Mechanization of Natural Philosophy, Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
• Schliesser, E., 2011, “Without God: Newton’s Relational Theory of Attraction,” in D. Jalobeanu and P. Anstey (eds.), Vanishing Matter and the Laws of Motion: Descartes and Beyond, London: Routledge, pp. 80–100. (Scholar)
• Smith, R., 2009, “Aristotle’s Logic,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/aristotle-logic/>. (Scholar)
• Stein, Howard, 2002 [2016], “Newton’s Metaphysics,” in I. Bernard Cohen and George E. Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 256–307; 2nd edition, Rob Iliffe and George E. Smith (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 321–381. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993, “On Philosophy and Natural Philosophy,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 18 (1): 177–201. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990, “Locke, the Great Huygenius, and the Incomparable Mr. Newton,” in P. Bricker and R. I. G. Hughes (eds.), Philosophical perspectives on Newtonian science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 17–48. (Scholar)
• Stuart, M., 1998, “Locke on Superaddition and Mechanism,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 6 (3): 351–379. (Scholar)
• Thomas, E., 2016, “On the ‘Evolution’ of Locke’s Space and Time Metaphysics,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 33(4): 305–325. (Scholar)
• Van Dyck, M., 2005, “The Paradox of Conceptual Novelty and Galileo’s Use of Experiments,” Philosophy of Science, (72)5: 864–875. (Scholar)
• Westfall, R. S., 1980, Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Wilson, M., 1991, “Superadded Properties: The Limits of Mechanism in Locke,” reprinted in Wilson, Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 196–214. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, Ideas and Mechanism, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Wisan, W.L., 1978, “Galileo’s scientific method: a reexamination,” in R.E. Butts and J.C. Pitt (eds.), New Perspectives on Galileo, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 1–58. (Scholar)
• Winkler, K. P., 2008, “Locke’s Defense of Mathematical Physics,” Paul Hoffman, David Owen, and Gideon Yaffe (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Science: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell. Toronto: Broadview Press, 231–252. (Scholar)
• Woolhouse, R.S., 1971, Locke’s Philosophy of Science and Knowledge, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994, “Locke’s Theory of Knowledge,” in Vere Chappell (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Locke, New York: Cambridge University Press, 146–171. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, “Locke and the Nature of Matter,” in C. Mercer and E. O’Neill (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter, and Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 142–161. (Scholar)
• Yolton, J., 1969, “The Science of Nature,” in John W. Yolton (ed.), John Locke: Problems and Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 183–193. (Scholar)
• Yost, R.M. 1951, “Locke’s Rejection of Hypotheses about Sub-Microscopic Events,” Journal of the History of Ideas 12(1): pp. 111–130. (Scholar)