Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Locke’s Philosophy of Science" by Hylarie Kochiras

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Primary Literature

Secondary Literature

  • Anstey, Peter, 2011, John Locke and Natural Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Atherton, M., 1991, “Corpuscles, Mechanism, and Essentialism in Berkeley and Locke”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 29 (1): 47–67. (Scholar)
  • Ayers, M.R., 1975, “The Ideas of Power and Substance in Locke’s Philosophy”, Philosophical Quarterly, 25 (98): 1–27. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1981, “Mechanism, Superaddition, and the Proof of God’s Existence in Locke’s Essay”, The Philosophical Review, 90 (2): 210–251. (Scholar)
  • Clarke, D.M., 1992, “Descartes’ philosophy of science”, in J. Cottingham (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Descartes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 258–285. (Scholar)
  • Cohen, I.B., 2002, “Newton’s concepts of force and mass, with notes on the Laws of Motion”, in I. Bernard Cohen and George E. Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 57–84. (Scholar)
  • Connolly, P.J., 2015, “Lockean Superaddition and Lockean Humility”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part A), 51: 53–61. (Scholar)
  • Curley, E.M., 1972, “Locke, Boyle, and the Distinction between Primary and Secondary Qualities”, The Philosophical Review, 81 (4): 438–464. (Scholar)
  • De Pierris, G., 2006, “Hume and Locke on Scientific Methodology: The Newtonian Legacy”, Hume Studies, 32(2): 277-330. (Scholar)
  • Dear, P., 1995, Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Domski, M., 2012, “Locke’s Qualified Embrace of Newton’s Principia”, in Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays, ed. A. Janiak, and E. Schliesser, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Downing, L., 1997, “Locke’s Newtonianism and Lockean Newtonianism”, Perspectives on Science, 5(3): 285–310. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1998, “The Status of Mechanism in Locke’s Essay”, The Philosophical Review, 107 (3): 381–414. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007, “Locke’s Ontology,” in L. Newman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Locke’s Essay, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 352–380. (Scholar)
  • Henry, J., 1994, “‘Pray do not ascribe that notion to me’: God and Newton’s Gravity”, in J.E. Force and R. H. Popkin (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scripture: Recent Essays on Natural Philosophy, Theology and Biblical Criticism in the Netherlands of Spinoza’s Time and the British Isles of Newton’s Time, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 123–147. (Scholar)
  • Hill, J., 2004, “Locke’s Account of Cohesion and its Philosophical Significance”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 12 (4): 611 – 630. (Scholar)
  • Jacovides, Michael, 2017, Locke’s Image of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Janiak, A., 2008, Newton as Philosopher, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Jardine, N., 1991, “Demonstration, Dialectic, and Rhetoric, in Galileo’s Dialogue”, in D.R. Kelley and R.H.Popkin, Shapes of Knowledge from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, Berlin: Springer, pp. 101–121. (Scholar)
  • Jolley, N., 2002, Locke: His Philosophical Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Kochiras, H. 2011. “Gravity’s Cause and Substance Counting: Contextualizing the Problems”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 42(1): 167–184. (Scholar)
  • Koyre, A., 1965, Newtonian Studies, London: Chapman & Hall. (Scholar)
  • Mandelbaum, M., 1964, Philosophy, Science, and Sense Perception, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press. (Scholar)
  • McCann, E., 1994: “Locke’s Philosophy of Body”, in V. Chapell (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Locke, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–88. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002, “John Locke”, in S. Nadler, A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. (Scholar)
  • McGuire, J.E., 1970, “Atoms and the Analogy of Nature,” reprinted in J.E. McGuire, Tradition and Innovation: Newton’s Metaphysics of Nature (The University of Western Ontario Series in the Philosophy of Science), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1995. (Scholar)
  • Osler, M.J., 1998, “Mixing Metaphors: Science and religion or natural philosophy and theology in early modern Europe”, History of Science, 36: 91–113. (Scholar)
  • Osler, M.J., 1970, “John Locke and the Changing Ideal of Scientific Knowledge”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 31 (1): 3–16. (Scholar)
  • Ott, Walter, 2009, Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Palmieri, P., 1998 “Re-examining Galileo’s Theory of Tides”, Archiv. Hist. Exact Sci. 53 (1998) 223–375. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2009, “A phenomenology of Galileo’s experiments with pendulums”, British Journal for the History of Science, 42(4): 479–513, December 2009. (Scholar)
  • Park, K. and Daston, L., 2006, “Introduction: The Age of the New”, in K. Park and L. Daston (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science (Volume 3: Early Modern Science), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Priselac, Matthew, 2016, Locke’s Science of Knowledge, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
  • Rogers, G.A.J., 1982, “The System of Locke and Newton”, in Z. Bechler (ed.), Contemporary Newtonian Research, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 215–238. (Scholar)
  • Roux, S., 2013, “An Empire Divided: French Natural Philosophy (1670-1690)”, in Garber and Roux (eds.), The Mechanization of Natural Philosophy, Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
  • Schliesser, E., 2011, “Without God: Newton’s Relational Theory of Attraction”, in D. Jalobeanu and P. Anstey (eds.), Vanishing Matter and the Laws of Motion: Descartes and Beyond, London: Routledge, pp. 80–100. (Scholar)
  • Smith, R., 2009, “Aristotle’s Logic”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/aristotle-logic/>. (Scholar)
  • Stein, Howard, 2002, “Newton’s Metaphysics”, in I. Bernard Cohen and George E. Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 256–307. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1993, “On Philosophy and Natural Philosophy”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 18 (1): 177–201. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1990, “Locke, the Great Huygenius, and the Incomparable Mr. Newton”, in P. Bricker and R. I. G. Hughes (eds.), Philosophical perspectives on Newtonian science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 17–48. (Scholar)
  • Stuart, M., 1998, “Locke on Superaddition and Mechanism,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 6 (3): 351–379. (Scholar)
  • Van Dyck, M., 2005, “The Paradox of Conceptual Novelty and Galileo’s Use of Experiments”, Philosophy of Science, (72) 5: 864–875. (Scholar)
  • Westfall, R. S., 1980, Never at Rest: a Biography of Isaac Newton, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Wilson, M., 1991, “Superadded Properties: The Limits of Mechanism in Locke”, reprinted in Wilson, Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 196–214. (Scholar)
  • Wisan, W.L., 1978, “Galileo’s scientific method: a reexamination”, in R.E. Butts and J.C. Pitt (eds.), New Perspectives on Galileo, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 1–58. (Scholar)
  • Winkler, K. P., 2008, “Locke’s Defense of Mathematical Physics”, Paul Hoffman, David Owen, and Gideon Yaffe (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Science: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell. Toronto: Broadview Press, 231–252. (Scholar)
  • Woolhouse, R.S., 1971, Locke’s Philosophy of Science and Knowledge, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1994, “Locke’s Theory of Knowledge”, in Vere Chappell (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Locke, New York: Cambridge University Press, 146–171. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005, “Locke and the Nature of Matter”, in C. Mercer and E. O’Neill (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter, and Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 142–161. (Scholar)
  • Yolton, J., 1969, “The Science of Nature”, in John W. Yolton (ed.), John Locke: Problems and Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 183–193. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Apr 11 22:12:54 2021