Select Primary Sources

• Filmer, Robert, Sir Robert Filmer: Patriarcha and Other Writings, Johann P. Sommerville (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511812644
• Hooker, Richard, 1594, Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity, A. S. McGrade (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975. (Scholar)
• Locke, John, Works, 10 volumes, London, 1823; reprinted, Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1963. Citations are Works then the volume and page number. [Locke Works 1823 available online] (Scholar)
• –––, 1690, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, four books, Peter H. Nidditch (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975. Citations are to Essay then book, chapter, and section. (Scholar)
• –––, 1689, Letter Concerning Toleration, James Tully (ed.), Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1983. (Scholar)
• –––, 1689, Two Treatises of Government, Peter Laslett (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. Citations are to Two Treatises then treatise and section. (Scholar)
• –––, 1693, Some Thoughts Concerning Education; and On the Conduct of the Understanding, Ruth Grant and Nathan Tarcov (eds.), Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1996. (Scholar)
• –––, Political Essays, Mark Goldie (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
• –––, An Essay Concerning Toleration and Other Writings on Law and Politics, 1667–1683, J.R. Milton and Phillip Milton (eds.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.
• Montesquieu, 1748, The Spirit of the Laws, Anne Cohler, Basia Miller, and Harold Stone (trans. and eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. (Scholar)
• Proast, Jonas, 1690, The Argument of the Letter concerning Toleration Briefly Consider’d and Answered, in The Reception of Locke’s Politics, vol. 5, Mark Goldie (ed.), London: Pickering & Chatto, 1999. (Scholar)
• –––, 1691, A Third Letter to the Author of …, in The Reception of Locke’s Politics, vol. 5, Mark Goldie (ed.), London: Pickering & Chatto, 1999. (Scholar)
• Pufendorf, Samuel, 1672, De Jure Naturae et Gentium (Volume 2), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1934. (Scholar)

Select Secondary Sources

• Aaron, Richard I., 1937, John Locke, Oxford: Oxford University Press; second edition 1955. (Scholar)
• Armitage, David, 2004, “John Locke, Carolina, and the Two Treatises of Government”, Political Theory, 32(5): 602–627. doi:10.1177/0090591704267122 (Scholar)
• Arneil, Barbara, 1996, John Locke and America: The Defence of English Colonialism, Oxford: Clarendon Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198279679.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Ashcraft, Richard, 1986, Revolutionary Politics and Locke’s Two Treatises of Government, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1987,Locke’s Two Treatises of Government, London: Allen & Unwin. (Scholar)
• Butler, Melissa A., 1978, “Early Liberal Roots of Feminism: John Locke and the Attack on Patriarchy”, American Political Science Review, 72(1): 135–150. doi:10.2307/1953604 (Scholar)
• Casson, Douglas, 2011, Liberating Judgment: Fanatics, Skeptics, and John Locke’s Politics of Probability, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Chappell, Vere (ed.), 1994, The Cambridge Companion to Locke, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/ccol0521383714 (Scholar)
• Colman, John, 1983, John Locke’s Moral Philosophy, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. (Scholar)
• Cranston, Maurice, 1957, John Locke, a Biography, London: Longmans, Green. (Scholar)
• Creppell, Ingrid, 1996, “Locke on Toleration: The Transformation of Constraint”, Political Theory, 24(2): 200–240. doi:10.1177/0090591796024002003 (Scholar)
• Davis, Michael, 2014, “Locke’s Political Society: Some Problems of Terminology in Two Treatises of Government”, Journal of Moral Philosophy, 11(2): 209–231. doi:10.1163/17455243-4681005 (Scholar)
• Dunn, John, 1967 [1980], “Consent in the Political Theory of John Locke”, The Historical Journal, 10(2): 153–182. Reprinted in his Political Obligation in its Historical Context: Essays in Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980, 29–52. (Scholar)
• –––, 1969, The Political Thought of John Locke: An Historical Account of the Argument of the “Two Treatises of Government”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511558436 (Scholar)
• –––, 1990, “What Is Living and What Is Dead in the Political Theory of John Locke?”, in his Interpreting Political Responsibility, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 9–26. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991, “The Claim to Freedom of Conscience: Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Thought, Freedom of Worship?”, in From Persecution to Toleration: the Glorious Revolution and Religion in England, Ole Peter Grell, Jonathan Israel, and Nicholas Tyacke (eds.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 171–193. (Scholar)
• Farr, James, 2008, “Locke, Natural Law, and New World Slavery”, Political Theory, 36(4): 495–522. doi:10.1177/0090591708317899 (Scholar)
• Forde, Steven, 2001, “Natural Law, Theology, and Morality in Locke”, American Journal of Political Science, 45(2): 396–409. doi:10.2307/2669348 (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “‘Mixed Modes’ in John Locke’s Moral and Political Philosophy”, The Review of Politics, 73(4): 581–608. doi:10.1017/s0034670511003652 (Scholar)
• Forster, Greg, 2005, John Locke’s Politics of Moral Consensus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511498114 (Scholar)
• Franklin, Julian, 1978, John Locke and the Theory of Sovereignty: Mixed Monarchy and the Right of Resistance in the Political Thought of the English Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Goldie, Mark, 1983, “John Locke and Anglican Royalism”, Political Studies, 31(1): 61–85. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1983.tb01335.x (Scholar)
• –––, 2015, “Locke and America”, in A Companion to Locke, Matthew Stuart (ed.), London: Wiley Blackwell, 546–563. doi:10.1002/9781118328705.ch28 (Scholar)
• Grant, Ruth W., 1987, John Locke’s Liberalism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “John Locke on Custom’s Power and Reason’s Authority”, The Review of Politics, 74(4): 607–629. doi:10.1017/s0034670512000770 (Scholar)
• Hoff, Shannon, 2015, “Locke and the Nature of Political Authority”, The Review of Politics, 77(1): 1–22. doi:10.1017/s0034670514000813 (Scholar)
• Harris, Ian, 1994, The Mind of John Locke: A Study of Political Theory in its Intellectual Setting, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Hirschmann, Nancy J. and Kirstie Morna McClure (eds.), 2007, Feminist Interpretations of John Locke, University Park, PA: Penn State University Press. (Scholar)
• Macpherson, C.B., 1962, The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Marshall, John, 1994, John Locke: Resistance, Religion and Responsibility, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511598531 (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, John Locke, Toleration, and Early Enlightenment Culture: Religious Intolerance and Arguments for Religious Toleration in Early Modern and “Early Enlightenment” Europe, (Cambridge Studies in Early Modern British History), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Numao, J.K., 2013, “Locke on Atheism”, History of Political Thought, 34(2): 252–272. (Scholar)
• Herzog, Don, 1985, Without Foundations: Justification in Political Theory, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
• Horton, John P. and Susan Mendus (eds.), 1991, John Locke’s Letter on Toleration in Focus, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Kendall, Willmoore, 1959, John Locke and the Doctrine of Majority-Rule, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. (Scholar)
• Nozick, Robert, 1974, Anarchy, State, and Utopia, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
• Pangle, Thomas, 1988, The Spirit of Modern Republicanism: The Moral Vision of the American Founders and the Philosophy of Locke, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Parker, Kim Ian, 2004, The Biblical Politics of John Locke, Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press. (Scholar)
• Pasquino, Pasquale, 1998, “Locke on King’s Prerogative”, Political Theory, 26(2): 198–208. doi:10.1177/0090591798026002003 (Scholar)
• Pitkin, Hanna, 1965, “Obligation and Consent—I”, American Political Science Review, 59(4): 990–999. doi:10.2307/1953218 (Scholar)
• de Roover, Jakob and S.N. Balagangadhara, 2008, “John Locke, Christian Liberty, and the Predicament of Liberal Toleration”, Political Theory, 36(4): 523–549. doi:10.1177/0090591708317969 (Scholar)
• Ryan, Alan, 1965, “Locke and the Dictatorship of the Bourgeoisie”, Political Studies, 13(2): 219–230. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1965.tb00366.x (Scholar)
• Seagrave, S. Adam, 2014, The Foundations of Natural Morality: On the Compatibility of Natural Law and Natural Right, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Seliger, Martin, 1968, The Liberal Politics of John Locke, London: Allen & Unwin. (Scholar)
• Simmons, A. John, 1992, The Lockean Theory of Rights, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993, On The Edge of Anarchy: Locke, Consent, and the Limits of Society, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Sreenivasan, Gopal, 1995, The Limits of Lockean Rights in Property, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Stanton, Timothy, 2011, “Authority and Freedom in the Interpretation of Locke’s Political Theory”, Political Theory, 39(1): 6–30. doi:10.1177/0090591710386571 (Scholar)
• Strauss, Leo, 1953, Natural Right and History, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Tarcov, Nathan, 1984, Locke’s Education for Liberty, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Tate, John William, 2013, “‘We Cannot Give One Millimetre’? Liberalism, Enlightenment and Diversity”, Political Studies, 61(4): 816–833. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12000 (Scholar)
• Tierney, Brian, 2014, Liberty and Law: Studies on the Idea of Permissive Natural Law, 1100–1800, Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press. (Scholar)
• Tuckness, Alex Scott, 1999, “The Coherence of a Mind: John Locke and the Law of Nature”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 37(1): 73–90. doi:10.1353/hph.2008.0833 (Scholar)
• –––, 2002a, Locke and the Legislative Point of View: Toleration, Contested Principles, and Law, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002b, “Rethinking the Intolerant Locke”, American Journal of Political Science, 46(2): 288–298. doi:10.2307/3088377 (Scholar)
• –––, 2008, “Punishment, Property, and the Limits of Altruism: Locke’s International Asymmetry”, American Political Science Review, 102(4): 467–479. doi:10.1017/s0003055408080349 (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, “Retribution and Restitution in Locke’s Theory of Punishment”, The Journal of Politics, 72(3): 720–732. doi:10.1017/s0022381610000125 (Scholar)
• Tully, James, 1980, A Discourse on Property: John Locke and His Adversaries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511558641 (Scholar)
• –––, 1993, An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts, (Ideas in Context), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511607882 (Scholar)
• Tunick, Mark, 2014, “John Locke and the Right to Bear Arms”, History of Political Thought, 35(1): 50–69. (Scholar)
• Udi, Juliana, 2015, “Locke and the Fundamental Right to Preservation: On the Convergence of Charity and Property Rights”, The Review of Politics, 77(2): 191–215. doi:10.1017/s0034670515000030 (Scholar)
• Van der Vossen, Bas, 2015, “Locke on Territorial Rights”, Political Studies, 63(3): 713–728. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12106 (Scholar)
• Vernon, Richard, 1997, The Career of Toleration: John Locke, Jonas Proast, and After, Montréal and Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, “Lockean Toleration: Dialogical Not Theological?”, Political Studies, 61(1): 215–230. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00958.x (Scholar)
• Waldron, Jeremy, 1988, The Right to Private Property, Oxford: Clarendon Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198239376.001.0001 (Scholar)
• –––, 1993, “Locke, Toleration, and the Rationality of Persecution”, in his Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 88–114. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, God, Locke, and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke’s Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613920 (Scholar)
• Wolfson, Adam, 2010, Persecution or Toleration: An Explication of the Locke-Proast Quarrel, 1689–1704, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. (Scholar)
• Wood, Neal, 1983, The Politics of Locke’s Philosophy, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1984, John Locke and Agrarian Capitalism, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Scholar)
• Woolhouse, Roger S., 2007, Locke: A Biography, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Wootton, David, 1993, “Introduction”, to John Locke: Political Writings, London: Penguin Books. (Scholar)
• Yolton, John W., 1958, “Locke on the Law of Nature”, The Philosophical Review, 67(4): 477–498. doi:10.2307/2182945 (Scholar)
• –––, 1969, John Locke: Problems and Perspectives; a Collection of New Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Zuckert, Michael P., 1994, Natural Rights and the New Republicanism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)