Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Ancient Logic" by Susanne Bobzien

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Greek and Latin Texts

  • Alcinous, Enseignement des doctrines de Platon, J. Whittaker (ed.), Paris: Bude, 1990.
  • Alexander of Aphrodisias, On Aristotle’s Prior Analytics 1. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Vol. 2.1, M. Wallies (ed.), Berlin: Reimer, 1883. (Scholar)
  • Alexander of Aphrodisias, On Aristotle’s Topics. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Vol. 2.2., M Wallies (ed.), Berlin: Reimer, 1891. (Scholar)
  • Apuleius, Peri Hermeneias in Apuleius, De Philosophia libri, C. Moreschini, (ed.), Stuttgart / Leipzig: Teubner, 1991. (Apulei opera quae supersunt vol.3.) (Scholar)
  • Aristotle, Analytica Priora et Posteriora, L. Minio-Paluello (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964.
  • Aristotle, Categoriae et Liber de interpretatione, L. Minio-Paluello (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1949.
  • Aristotle, Metaphysica, W. Jaeger (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1957.
  • Aristotle, Topica et Sophistici Elenchi, W.D. Ross (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958.
  • Boethius, De hypotheticis syllogismis, L. Obertello (ed.), with Italian translation, Brescia: Paideia, 1969. (Istituto di Filosofia dell’Università di Parma, Logicalia 1.)
  • Boethius, De topicis differentiis, D.Z. Nikitas (ed.), in Boethius, De topicis differentiis kai hoi buzantines metafraseis tou Manouel Holobolou kai Prochorou Kudone, Athens/Paris/Brussels: Academy of Athens/Vrin/Ousia, 1969.
  • Boethius, In librum Aristotelis De interpretatione—secunda editio, C. Meiser (ed.), Leipzig, 1880.
  • Cicero, M. Tullius, Academica posteriora—Academica priora (Academicorum reliquiae cum Lucullo), O. Plasberg (ed.), Leipzig: Teubner, 1922; reprinted Stuttgart 1966. (Stoics, Epicureans) (Scholar)
  • Cicero, M. Tullius, De divinatione—De fato—Timaeus, W. Ax (ed.), Leipzig: Teubner, 1938; reprinted Stuttgart, 1965. (Stoics, Epicureans) (Scholar)
  • Diels, H. (ed.), Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Berlin: Reimer, 1882–1909.
  • Diodorus Cronus, in Die Megariker. Kommentierte Sammlung der Testimonien, K. Döring (ed.), Amsterdam: Gruener, 1972, 28–45 and 124–139. (Diodorus and Philo)
  • Diogenes Laertius, Lives of the Philosophers, 2 vols., M. Marcovich (ed.), Stuttgart & Leipzig: Teubner, 1999.
  • Dissoi Logoi, Contrasting Arguments—An Edition of the Dissoi Logoi, T. M. Robinson (ed.), London, 1979.
  • Epicurus: Arrighetti, G., (ed.), Epicuro Opere, 2nd edition, Turin: Einaudi, 1973. (Collection of Epicurean fragments.)
  • Epicurus: Usener, H., (ed.), Epicurea, Leipzig: Teubner, 1887. (Collection of Epicurean fragments.)
  • Galen, Institutio Logica, K. Kalbfleisch (ed.), Leipzig, 1896.
  • Giannantoni, G., (ed.), Socratis et Socraticorum Reliquiae (4 volumes), Elenchos 18, Naples, 1983–1990.
  • Plato, Euthydemus, in Platonis Opera, vol. III, J. Burnet (ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1903.
  • Plato, Republic, in Platonis Opera, vol. IV, J. Burnet (ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1902.
  • Plato, Sophistes, in Platonis Opera, vol. I, J. Burnet (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1900.
  • Porphyry, Isagoge Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Vol 4.1, A. Busse (ed.), Berlin, 1887.
  • Sextus Empiricus, Works, 3 vols, H. Mutschmann and J. Mau (eds), Leipzig: Teubner, 1914–61.
  • Stoics, in Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker, K. Hülser (ed.), 4 volumes, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1987–8.
  • Theophrastus, Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for his Life, Writings, Thought and Influence, P.M. Huby (ed.), Leiden: Brill, 1992, 114–275.
  • Zeno, in Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, H. Diels and W. Kranz (eds.), Berlin: Weidmann, 1951.

Translations of Greek and Latin Texts

  • Ackrill, J. L., (trans. & comm.), 1961, Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • Annas, J. and J. Barnes, (trans.), 2000, Sextus Empiricus. Outlines of Scepticism, 2nd edition, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Barnes, J., (trans. & comm.), 1975, Aristotle, Posterior Analytics, Oxford: Clarendon Press. 2nd Ed. 1996. (Scholar)
  • –––, (trans. and comm.), 1987, Early Greek Philosophy, London: Penguin Books. (Zeno) (Scholar)
  • –––, (trans.), 2003, Porphyry’s Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Porphyry: Isagoge). (Scholar)
  • Barnes, J., and S. Bobzien, K. Ierodiakonou, (trans.), 1991, Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Prior Analytics 1.1–7, London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
  • Blank, D., (trans.), 1998, Ammonius On Aristotle’s On Interpretation 9 (with N. Kretzmann, trans.), Boethius On Aristotle’s On Interpretation 9 1.1–7, London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
  • Brittain, C. (trans.), 2006, Cicero: On Academic Scepticism (= Academica) Indianapolis: Hackett. (Stoics, Epicureans) (Scholar)
  • Bury R. G., (trans.), 1933–1949, Sextus Empiricus, 4 vols., Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd., Loeb Classical Library, vols 1 and 2. (Scholar)
  • De Lacy, Ph. H. and E. A. De Lacy, (trans.), 1978, Philodemus. On Methods of Inference, 2nd Ed., Naples: Bibliopolis. (Epicureans) (Scholar)
  • Dillon, J. M., 1993, Alcinous. The Handbook of Platonism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Dorion, L.-A., (trans & comm.), 1995, Aristote: Les refutations sophistiques, Paris: J. Vrin. (Scholar)
  • Hicks, R.D., (trans.), 1925, Diogenes Laertius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, 2 volumes, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd., Loeb Classical Library. (Protagoras Alcidamas, Antisthenes, Eubulides, Stoics) (Scholar)
  • Huby, P.M., (trans.), 1992, in W. W. Fortenbaugh (ed.), Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for his Life, Writings, Thought and Influence, texts & tr., Leiden: Brill, 114–275.
  • Hülser, K. (trans.), 1987–8, Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker, 4 volumes, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog. (Stoics; Chrysippus) (Scholar)
  • Kieffer, J. S. (trans), 1964, Galen’s Institutio logica, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
  • Lee, D. (trans. & comm.), 1955, 1974, Plato. The Republic, New York: Penguin Books. (Scholar)
  • Londey, D. and C. Johanson, (trans.), 1988, The Logic of Apuleius, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
  • McCabe, M.M., (trans. & comm.), 2005, Plato, Euthydemus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Mueller I., with J. Gould, (trans.), 1999, Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Prior Analytics I.8–13. and I,14–22, 2 volumes, London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
  • Oldfather, W. A., (trans.), 1925–8, Epictetus, The Discourses, The Manual and Fragments, 2 vols, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd., Loeb Classical Library. (Stoics) (Scholar)
  • Ophuisen, J. M. van, (trans.), 2001, Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Topics 1, London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
  • Pickard-Cambridge, W. A. (trans.), 1984, Aristotle, Topics and Sophistical Refutations, in The Complete Works of Aristotle, The Revised Oxford Translation, vol. 1, J. Barnes (ed.), Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
  • Ross, W. D. (trans.), Aristotle, Metaphysics, in The Complete Works of Aristotle, The Revised Oxford Translation, vol. 2, J. Barnes (ed.), Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
  • Sharples, R. W., 1991, Cicero: On Fate & Boethius: The Consolations of Philosophy IV.5–7, V, Warminster: Oxbow Books. (Stoics, Epicureans) (Scholar)
  • Smith, A., (trans.), 2014, Boethius on Aristotle’s On Interpretation 1–3 1.1–7, London: Bloomsbury. (Scholar)
  • –––, (trans.), 2014, Boethius on Aristotle’s On Interpretation 4–6 1.1–7, London: Bloomsbury. (Scholar)
  • Smith, R., (trans. & comm.), 1989, Aristotle’s Prior Analytics, Indianapolis: Hackett. (Scholar)
  • –––, (trans. & comm.), 1997, Aristotle, Topics I, VIII, and Selections, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • Striker, G., (trans. & comm.), 2009, Aristotle, Prior Analytics: Book I, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Stump, E., (trans.), 1978, Boethius’s ‘De topicis differentiis’, Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
  • Waterfield, R., (trans.), 2000, The First Philosophers: The Presocratics and The Sophists, Oxford: Oxford University Press (Dissoi Logoi and Sophists). (Scholar)
  • Weidemann, H., (trans. & comm.), 1994, Aristoteles, De Interpretatione, Berlin: Akademie Verlag. (Scholar)
  • White N. P., (trans.), 1993, Plato: Sophist, Indianapolis: Hackett. (Scholar)
  • Whittaker, J. (trans.), 1990, Alcinous. Enseignement des doctrines de Platon, Paris: Bude. (Scholar)

Secondary Literature

General

  • Anderson, A. R. and N. D. Belnap Jr., 1975, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. I, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
  • Barnes, J., 2007, Truth, etc., Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Barnes, J., et al., 1999, “Logic”, in Keimpe Algra, et al. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 77–176. (Scholar)
  • Kneale, M. and W. Kneale, 1962, The Development of Logic, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)

The Beginnings

Aristotle

  • Barnes, J. , 1981, “Proof and the Syllogism”, in E. Berti (ed.), Aristotle on Science: the ‘Posterior Analytics’, Padua: Antenore, 17–59. (Scholar)
  • Corcoran, J., 1974, “Aristotle’s Natural Deduction System”, in Corcoran, J. (ed.) Ancient Logic and its Modern Interpretation, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 85–131. (Scholar)
  • Evans, J.D.G., 1975, “The Codification of False Refutations in Aristotle’s De Sophistici Elenchis”, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 201: 45–52. (Scholar)
  • Frede, D., 1985, “The sea-battle reconsidered. A defence of the traditional interpretation”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 3: 31–87. (Scholar)
  • Frede, M., 1987, “The Title, Unity, and Authenticity of the Aristotelian Categories”, in M. Frede, Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 11–28. (Scholar)
  • Kretzmann, N., 1974, “Aristotle on Spoken Sounds Significant by Convention”, in J. Corcoran (ed.), Ancient Logic and its Modern Interpretation, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 3–21. (Scholar)
  • Lear, J., 1980, Aristotle and Logical Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Łukasiewicz, J., 1957, Aristotle’s Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic, 2nd edition, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • Malink, M., 2013, Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Owen, G. E. L., (ed.) 1968, Aristotle on Dialectic: The Topics (Proceedings of the Third Symposium Aristotelicum), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Owen, G.E.L., 1965, “Inherence”, Phronesis, 10: 97–105. (Scholar)
  • Patterson, R., 1995, Aristotle’s Modal Logic: Essence and Entailment in the Organon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Patzig, Günther, 1969, Aristotle’s Theory of the Syllogism, J. Barnes (trans.), Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
  • Primavesi, O., 1996, Die aristotelische Topik, Munich: C. H. Beck. (Scholar)
  • Smiley, T., 1974, “What Is a Syllogism?”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1: 136–154. (Scholar)
  • Smith, R., 1983, “What is Aristotelian Ecthesis?”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 24: 224–32. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1994, “Logic”, in The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, J. Barnes (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 27–65. (Scholar)
  • –––, “Aristotle’s Logic”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2004 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2004/entries/aristotle-logic/>. (Scholar)
  • Steinkrüger, P., 2015, “Aristotle’s assertoric syllogistic and modern relevance logic”, Synthese, 192: 1413–1444. (Scholar)
  • Striker, G., 1979, “Aristoteles über Syllogismen ‘Aufgrund einer Hypothese’”, Hermes, 107: 33–50. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1994, “Modal vs. Assertoric Syllogismsc”, Ancient Philosophy, 14: 39–51. (Scholar)
  • Whitaker, C. W. A., 1996, Aristotle’s De Interpretatione: Contradiction and Dialectic, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)

Theophrastus and Eudemus

Diodorus Cronus and Philo the Logician

  • Bobzien, S., 1993, “Chrysippus’ modal logic and its relation to Philo and Diodorus”, in Dialektiker und Stoiker, K. Döring and Th. Ebert (eds.), Stuttgart: Franz Steiner. (Scholar)
  • Denyer, N.C., 1981, “Time and Modality in Diodorus Cronus”, Theoria, 47: 31–53. (Scholar)
  • Prior, A.N., 1955, “Diodorean Modalities”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 5: 205–213. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1967, Past, Present, and Future, Oxford: Clarendon Press, chapters II.1–2 and III.1. (Scholar)
  • Sedley, D., 1977, “Diodorus Cronus and Hellenistic Philosophy”, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 203 (NS 23): 74–120. (Scholar)

The Stoics

  • Atherton, C., 1993, The Stoics on Ambiguity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Bobzien, S., 1996, “Stoic Syllogistic”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 14: 133–92. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1997, “Stoic Hypotheses and Hypothetical Argument”, Phronesis, 42: 299–312. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999, “Stoic Logic”, in K. Algra, J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld, & M. Schofield (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 92–157. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002, “Chrysippus and the Epistemic Theory of VaguenessProceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 102: 217–238. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011, “The Combinatorics of Stoic Conjunction”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 40: 157–188. (Scholar)
  • Bronowski, A., 2019, The Stoics on Lekta, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Brunschwig, J., 1994, “Remarks on the Stoic theory of the proper noun”, in his Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 39–56. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1994, “Remarks on the classification of simple propositions in Hellenistic logics” , in his Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57–71. (Scholar)
  • Cavini, W., 1993, “Chrysippus on Speaking Truly and the Liar”, in Dialektiker und Stoiker, K. Döring and Th. Ebert (eds), Stuttgart: Franz Steiner. (Scholar)
  • Crivelli, P., 1994, “Indefinite propositions and anaphora in Stoic logicPhronesis, 39: 187–206. (Scholar)
  • Ebert, Th., 1993, “Dialecticians and Stoics on Classifying Propositions” in K. Döring and Th. Ebert (eds.), Dialektiker und Stoiker. Zur Logik der Stoiker und ihrer Vorläufer, Stuttgart: Steiner, 111–127. (Scholar)
  • Frede, M., 1974, Die stoische Logik, Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1975, “Stoic vs. Aristotelian Syllogistic”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 56(1): 1–32. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1994 “The Stoic notion of a lekton”, in Companion to ancient thought 3: Language, Stephen Everson (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 109–128. (Scholar)
  • Gaskin, R., 1997, “The Stoics on Cases, Predicates and the Unity of the Proposition,” in Aristotle and After, R. Sorabji (ed.), London: Institute of Classical Studies, 91–108. (Scholar)
  • Lloyd, A. C., 1978, “Definite propositions and the concept of reference”, in J. Brunschwig (ed.), Les Stoïciens et leur logique, Paris: Vrin, 285–295. (Scholar)
  • Long, A. A., 1971, “Language and Thought in Stoicism”, in A. A. Long (ed.), Problems in Stoicism, London: Duckworth, 75–113. (Scholar)
  • Mates, B., 1961, Stoic Logic, Berkeley-Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Scholar)
  • McCall, S., 1966, “Connexive Implication”, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 31: 415–433. (Scholar)
  • Schenkeveld, D.M., 1984, “Stoic and Peripatetic Kinds of Speech Act and the Distinction of Grammatical Moods” Mnemosyne, 37: 291–351. (Scholar)

Epicurus

  • Atherton, C., 2005, “Lucretius on what language is not”, in D. Frede and Brad Inwood (eds.), Language and Learning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Barnes, J., 1988, “Epicurean Signs”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy (Supplementary Volume), 135–44. (Scholar)
  • Manetti, G., 2002, “Philodemus’ ‘De signis’: An important ancient semiotic debate”, Semiotica, 138: 279–297. (Scholar)

Later Antiquity

  • Barnes, J., 1993, “A Third Sort of Syllogism: Galen and the Logic of Relations” in Modern Thinkers and Ancient Thinkers, R. W. Sharples (ed.), Boulder, CO: Westview Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1997, Logic and the Imperial Stoa, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
  • Bobzien, S., 2002, “The development of modus ponens in antiquity: From Aristotle to the 2nd century AD”, Phronesis, 47(4): 359–394. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002, “Propositional logic in Ammonius” in H. Linneweber-Lammerskitten / G. Mohr (eds.), Interpretation und Argument, Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 103–119. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004, “Hypothetical Syllogistic in Galen—Propositional logic off the rails?” Rhizai: Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science, 2: 57–102. (Scholar)
  • Ebbesen, S., 1990, “Porphyry’s legacy to logic”, in R. Sorabji, Aristotle Transformed—The Ancient Commentators and their Influence, London: Duckworth, 141–171. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1990, “Boethius as an Aristotelian Commentator” in R. Sorabji Aristotle Transformed—The Ancient Commentators and their Influence, London: Duckworth, 373–91. (Scholar)
  • Lee, T. S., 1984, Die griechische Tradition der aristotelischen Syllogistik in der Spätantike (Hypomnemata 79), Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. (Scholar)
  • Martin, C. J., 1991, “The Logic of Negation in Boethius”, Phronesis, 36: 277–304. (Scholar)
  • Sullivan, W. M., 1967, Apuleian Logic. The Nature, Sources and Influences of Apuleius’ Peri Hermeneias, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co. (Scholar)
  • Stump, E., 1989, “Dialectic and Boethius’s De topicis differentiis”, in E. Stump, Dialectic and Its Place in the Development of Medieval Logic, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 31–56. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Jan 23 23:55:58 2022