Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Informal Logic" by Leo Groarke

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

  • Ajdukiewicz, K., 1974. Pragmatic Logic, O. Wojtasiewicz (trans.), Dordrecht/Boston/Warsaw: D. Reidel Publishing Company & PWN – Polish Scientific Publishers. (English translation of Logika pragmatyczna, originally published 1965.). (Scholar)
  • Arnauld, Antoine, and Pierre Nicole, 1662. Logic, or, The Art of Thinking, Thomas Spencer Baynes (trans.), Edinburgh: Sutherland and Knox, 1850; scan available online. (Scholar)
  • Barwise, Jon and John Etchemendy, 1998. “Computers, Visualization, and the Nature of Reasoning,” in T. W. Bynum and James H. Moor (eds.), The Digital Phoenix: How Computers are Changing Philosophy, London: Blackwell. (Scholar)
  • Battersby, Mark and Sharon Bailin, 2011. “Fallacy identification in a dialectical approach to teaching critical thinking,” OSSA Conference Archive, Windsor: University of Windsor. available online. (Scholar)
  • Battersby, Mark, 2016. Is That a Fact? A Field Guide for Evaluating Statistical and Scientific Information, Peterborough: Broadview Press. (Scholar)
  • Bennett, Bo, 2013. Logically … Fallacious: The Ultimate Collection of over 300 Logical Fallacies, Sudbury: eBookIt.com. (Scholar)
  • Bermejo Luque, Lilian, 2011. Giving Reasons: A Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory, Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
  • Birdsell, David and Leo Groarke (eds.), 2007. 2nd Special Issue on Visual Argumentation, Argumentation and Advocacy (The Journal of the American Forensic Association), 34(3). (Scholar)
  • Blair, J. Anthony, 2015. “What Is Informal Logic?” Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation (Argumentation Library, Volume 28), Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2012. Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair, Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1996. “The Possibility and Actuality of Visual Arguments,” Argumentation and Advocacy, 33(1): 23–39. (Scholar)
  • Bowell, Tracy and Gary Kemp, 2010. Critical Thinking: A Concise Guide, Routledge: London. (Scholar)
  • Brinton, Alan and Douglas Walton, 1997. Historical Foundations of Informal Logic, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing. (Scholar)
  • Budzynska, Katarzyna, Michal Araszkiewicz, Barbara Bogołȩbska, Piotr Cap, Tadeusz Ciecierski,Kamila Debowska-Kozlowska, Barbara Dunin-Kȩplicz, Marcin Dziubiński, Michał Federowicz, Anna Gomolińska, Andrzej Grabowski, Teresa Hołówka, Łukasz Jochemczyk, Magdalena Kacprzak,Paweł Kawalec, Maciej Kielar, Andrzej Kisielewicz, Marcin Koszowy, Robert Kublikowski, Piotr Kulicki, Anna Kuzio, Piotr Lewiński, Jakub Z. Lichański, Jacek Malinowski, Witold Marciszewski, Edward Nieznański, Janina Pietrzak, Jerzy Pogonowski, Tomasz A. Puczyłowski, Jolanta Rytel, Anna Sawicka, Marcin Selinger, Andrzej Skowron, Joanna Skulska, Marek Smolak, Małgorzata Sokół, Agnieszka Sowińska, Piotr Stalmaszczyk, Tomasz Stawecki, Jarosław Stepaniuk, Alina Strachocka, Wojciech Suchoń, Krzysztof Szymanek, Justyna Tomczyk, Robert Trypuz, Kazimierz Trzȩsicki, Mariusz Urbański, Ewa Wasilewska-Kamińska, Krzysztof A. Wieczorek, Maciej Witek, Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska, · Olena Yaskorska, Maria Załȩska, Konrad Zdanowski, Tomasz Żurek, 2014. “The Polish School of Argumentation: A Manifesto,” Argumentation, 28(3): 267-282, available online.
  • Browne, M. Neil and Stuart M. Keeley, 2010. Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. (Scholar)
  • Burke, Michael B., 1994. “Denying the Antecedent: A Common Fallacy?” Informal Logic, 16(1): 23–30. (Scholar)
  • Carozza, L. (2007). “Dissent in the midst of emotional territory,” Informal Logic, 27(2): 197–210. (Scholar)
  • Copi, Irving, 1953. Introduction to Logic, New York: Macmillan. (Scholar)
  • Crosswhite, James, 1996. The Rhetoric of Reason: Writing and the Attractions of Argument, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. (Scholar)
  • Dove, Ian, 2016. “Visual Scheming: Assessing Visual Arguments,” Argumentation and Advocacy (Special Issue: Twenty Years of Visual Argument), D. Godden, Catherine H. Palczewski, and Leo Groarke (eds.), 52(4): 254–264. (Scholar)
  • Dumke, G., 1980. Chancellor’s Executive Order 338, Chancellor’s Office, Long Beach: California State University. (Scholar)
  • Eemeren, Frans H. van, B. Garssen, E.C.W. Krabbe, F.A. Snoeck Henkemans, B. Verheij, and J.H.M. Wagemans, 2014, Handbook of Argumentation Theory, Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
  • Eemeren, Frans H. van (ed.), 2002. Advances In Pragma-Dialectics, Amsterdam: SicSat. (Scholar)
  • Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst, 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Scholar)
  • Eemeren, Frans H. van, R. Grootendorst, F. S. Henkemans, J. A. Blair, R. H. Johnson, E. C. W. Krabbe, C. Plantin, D. N. Walton, C. A. Willard, J. Woods, and D. Zarefsky, 1996. Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Scholar)
  • Ennis, R.H., 2013. “Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum.” D. Mohammed & M. Lewiński (eds.), Virtues of Argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), Windsor, ON: OSSA, pp. 1-16, available online. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011. “Critical Thinking: Reflection and Perspective” (Part I), Inquiry, 26(1): 4–18. (Scholar)
  • Feldman, Richard, 2009. “Thinking, Reasoning, and Education,” in Harvey Siegel (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Feteris, Eveline, Bart Garssen and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, 2011. Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Scholar)
  • Finocchiaro, Maurice A., 1997. “The Port-Royal Logic’s Theory of Argument,” Argumentation, 11: 393–410. (Scholar)
  • Fisher, Alec, 2011. Critical Thinking: An Introduction, 2nd edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Fisher, Walter R. 1987. Human Communication as Narration. Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action, Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. (Scholar)
  • Gilbert, Michael, 2014. Arguing with people, Peterborough: Broadview Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2001. How to Win an Argument, New York: MJF Books. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1997. Coalescent Argumentation, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Scholar)
  • Godden, David, 2005. “Deductivism as an Interpretive Strategy: A Reply to Groarke’s Recent Defense of Reconstructive Deductivism,” Argumentation and Advocacy, 41(3): 168–83. (Scholar)
  • Goldman, Alvin I., 1999. Knowledge in a Social World, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • Goodwin, Jean and Viviana Cortes, 2010. “Theorists’ and practitioners’ spatial metaphors for argumentation: A corpus-based approach,” Verbum, 23: 163–78. (Scholar)
  • Goodwin, Jean, 2001. “Henry Johnstone, Jr.’s Still-Unacknowledged Contributions to Contemporary Argumentation Theory,” Informal Logic, 21(1): 41–50. (Scholar)
  • Govier, Trudy, 2014. A Practical Study of Argument, Boston: Wadsworth. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999. The Philosophy of Argument, Newport News: Vale Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1987. Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation, Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter/Foris. (Scholar)
  • Govier, T. & L. Ayers, 2012. “Logic, Parables, and Argument,” Informal Logic 32(2): 161-189. (Scholar)
  • Grennan, Wayne, 1997. Informal Logic: Issues and Techniques: A proposal for a new system of argument evaluation, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. (Scholar)
  • Groarke, Leo, 2015. “Going Multimodal: What is a Mode of Arguing and Why Does it Matter?”, Argumentation, 29(2): 133–155, available online. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007. “What’s Wrong With the California Critical Thinking Test?” in Sobocan & Groarke (eds.) 2007. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999. “Deductivism Within Pragma-Dialectics,” Argumentation, 13: 1–16. (Scholar)
  • Groarke, Leo and Christopher Tindale, 2013. Good Reasoning Matters!, Toronto: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Groarke, Louis, 2009. An Aristotelian Account of Induction: Creating Something From Nothing, Montreal, Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press. (Scholar)
  • Hamblin, Charles Leonard, 1970. Fallacies, London: Methuen. (Scholar)
  • Hansen, Hans V., 2011. “Are there methods of informal logic?” in F. Zenker (ed.), Argumentation: Community and Cognition, Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, Windsor: CRRAR. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002. “The Straw Thing of Fallacy Theory: The Standard Definition of ‘Fallacy’,” Argumentation, 16(2): 133–155. (Scholar)
  • Hansen, Hans V. and Robert C. Pinto (eds.), 1995. Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. (Scholar)
  • Harrison, Frank R. III, 1969. Deductive Logic and Descriptive Language, London: Prentice Hall. (Scholar)
  • Hitchcock, David, 2007. “Informal logic and the concept of argument,” in Dale Jacquette (ed.), Philosophy of Logic (Volume 5, Handbook of the Philosophy of Science), Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 101–129. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002. “The Practice of Argumentative Discussion,” Argumentation, 16(3): 287–298. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1995. “Do Fallacies Have a Place in the Teaching of Reasoning Skills or Critical Thinking?” in Hans V. Hansen and Robert C. Pinto (eds.), Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. (Scholar)
  • Hoffman, Michael H.G., 2016. “Reflective Argumentation: A Cognitive Function of Arguing”. Argumentation, 30: 1–33. (Scholar)
  • Hughes, William, Jonathan Lavery & Katheryn Doran, 2014. Critical Thinking: An Introduction to the Basic Skills, Peterborough: Broadview. (Scholar)
  • Johnson, Ralph H., 2011. “Informal Logic and Deductivism,” Studies in Logic, 4(1): 17–37. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007. “Making Sense of ‘Informal Logic’,” Informal Logic, 26(3): 231–58. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000. Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1996 [2014]. The Rise of Informal Logic, Newport News, VA: Vale Press (1996); Digital edition, University of Windsor: Windsor Studies in Argumentation, 2014.
  • Johnson, Ralph H. and J. Anthony Blair, 1994. “Informal Logic: Past and Present,” in Ralph H. Johnson and J. Anthony Blair (eds.), New Essays in Informal Logic, Windsor: Informal Logic, 1–19. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1977 [1994]. Logical Self-Defense, 1st edition (1977), 3rd edition (1994), Toronto: McGraw Hill-Ryerson.
  • Jørgensen, Charlotte, Christian Kock and Lone Rørbech, 1995. “Hostility in Public Debate,” in Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair and Charles Willard (eds.), Special Fields and Case Studies (Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Vol. IV), Amsterdam: International Centre for the Study of Argumentation. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1991. “Rhetoric That Shifts Votes: A Large-Scale Exploratory Study of Persuasion in Issue-Oriented Public Debates,” Political Communication, 15: 283–299. (Scholar)
  • Kahane, Howard, 1971 [1995]. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life, 1st edition (1971), 7th edition (1995), Belmont: Wadsworth.
  • Kahane, Howard and Nancy M. Cavender, 2002. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life, 9th Edition, Belmont: Wadsworth. (Scholar)
  • Kišiček, G., forthcoming. “The role of paralinguistic features in the analysis of multimodal argumentation,” in Proceedings of the 8th internationalconference on argumentation, University of Amsterdam:International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). (Scholar)
  • Kjeldsen, Jens, 2015. “The Study of Visual and Multimodal Argumentation,” Argumentation, 29(2): 115–132, available online. (Scholar)
  • Koszowy, Marcin. 2010. “Pragmatic Logic and the Study of Argumentation,” Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 22(35): 29–44. (Scholar)
  • Lazere, Donald, 1987. “Critical Thinking in College English Studies,” ERIC Digest (ED284275), Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills. (Scholar)
  • Little, J. Frederick, 1980. Critical Thinking and Decision Making: A Methodology of Analysis, Evaluation and Review, Toronto: Butterworths. (Scholar)
  • Lunsford, Andrea, John J. Ruszkiewicz, and Keith Walters, 2012. Everything’s an Argument, 6th Edition, Boston: Bedford/St. Martin. (Scholar)
  • Mans, Dieter and Gerhard Preyer (eds.), 1999. Reasoning and Argumentation, Special Issue, Protosociology, 13. (Scholar)
  • Mercier, Hugo and Dan Sperber, 2011. “Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34: 57–111. (Scholar)
  • Mochales, Raquel and Aagje Ieven, 2009. “Creating an Argumentation Corpus: Do Theories Apply to Real Arguments? A Case Study on the Legal Argumentation,” Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, New York: Association for Computing Machinery. (Scholar)
  • Nussbaum, Martha C., 1990. Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Olmos, Paula, 2014. “Classical Fables as Arguments: Narration and Analogy,” in Henrique Jales Ribeiro (ed.), Systematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy (Argumentation Library, Volume 25), Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
  • Plumer, Gilbert, 2015. “On Novels as Arguments,” Informal Logic, 35: 488–507. (Scholar)
  • Paul, Richard and Linda Elder, 2012. Fallacies: The Art of Mental Trickery, Tomales, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking. (Scholar)
  • Pinto, Robert C., 2001. Argument, Inference and Dialectic: Collected Papers on Informal Logic, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
  • Pospesel, Howard, 2002. Introduction to Logic: Predicate Logic, 2nd edition, Saddle River: Pearson Education. (Scholar)
  • Pospesel, Howard and David Marans, 1978. Arguments: Deductive Logic Exercises, Saddle River: Pearson Education. (Scholar)
  • Prakken, H. 2010a. “An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments,” Argument and Computation, 1: 93–124. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2010b. “On the nature of argument schemes,” in C.A. Reed & C. Tindale (eds.) Dialectics, Dialogue and Argumentation. An Examination of Douglas Walton’s Theories of Reasoning and Argument , London: College Publications. (Scholar)
  • Rahwana, Iyad, Fouad Zablitha, and Chris Reed, 2007. “Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument Web,” Artificial Intelligence, 171 (July-October): 897–921. (Scholar)
  • Reed, C.A. and T.J. Norman, 2004. Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Scholar)
  • Reed, C.A. and D.N. Walton, 2002. “Applications of Argumentation Schemes” in Hansen, H.V., C. W. Tindale, J.A. Blair, and R.H. Johnson (eds.), Argumentation and Its Applications: Proceedings of the 4th Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argument (CD), Windsor: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. (Scholar)
  • Rescher,Nicholas, 2005. Studies in Twentieth Century Philosophy, Frankfurt: Ontos. (Scholar)
  • Rodes, Robert E. and Howard Pospesel, 1991. Premises and Conclusions: Symbolic Logic for Legal Analysis, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. (Scholar)
  • Seay, Gary and Susana Nuccetelli, 2012. How to Think Logically, Boston: Pearson. (Scholar)
  • Siegel, Harvey, 1988. Educating reason: rationality, critical thinking, and education, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
  • Shelley, Cameron, 2003. “Aspects of visual argument: A study of the ‘March of Progress’,” Informal Logic, 21(2): 92–112. (Scholar)
  • Sobocan, Jan and Leo Groarke (eds.) (with Ralph H. Johnson and Fred S. Ellett, Jr.), 2007. Critical Thinking, Education and Assessment: Can Critical Thinking Be Tested?, London, Ontario: Althouse Press, University of Western Ontario. (Scholar)
  • Tindale, Christopher, 2010. Reason’s Dark Champions: Constructive Strategies of Sophistic Argument, Columbia: South Carolina Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004. Rhetorical Argumentation: Principles of Theory and Practice, Ithaca, NY: Sage Publications. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999. Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. (Scholar)
  • Toulmin, Stephen, 1958 [2003]. The Uses of Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, revised edition, 2003.
  • Verheij, Bart, 2014. “Argumentation and Artificial Intelligence,” Chapter 11 in Eemeren et al., 2014. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999. “Automated Argument Assistance for Lawyers,” Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, New York: Association of Computing Machinery, pp. 43–52. (Scholar)
  • Walton, Douglas N., 2012. “Story similarity in arguments from analogy,” Informal Logic, 32: 190–221. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007. Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004. Abductive Reasoning, Tuscaloosa, University of Alabama Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000. Scare Tactics: Arguments that Appeal to Fear and Threats (Argumentation Library: Volume 3), Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1997. “Judging How Heavily A Question is Loaded: A Pragmatic Method,” Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 17(2): 53–71. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1989. Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Walton, Douglas, Christopher Reed, Fabrizio Macagno,2008. Argumentation Schemes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Weston, Anthony, 2009. A Rulebook for Arguments, Indianapolis: Hackett. (Scholar)
  • Whately, Richard, 1826. Elements of logic, London: B. Fellowes. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1830. Elements of rhetoric, 3rd edition, Oxford: W. Baxter. (Scholar)
  • Wigmore, John Henry, 1913. The principles of judicial proof: as given by logic, psychology, and general experience, and illustrated in judicial trials, Boston: Little Brown. (Scholar)
  • Woods, John, 2000. “How Philosophical is Informal Logic? ” Informal Logic, 20(2): 139–167. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1995a. “Appeal to Force,” in Hansen and Pinto 1995. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1995b. “Fearful Symmetry,” in Hansen and Pinto 1995. (Scholar)
  • Woods, John and Douglas Walton, 1989. Fallacies: Selected Papers 1972–1982, Dordrecht/Providence: Foris. (Scholar)
  • Zenker, F. 2013. Bayesian Argumentation: The practical side of probability (Synthese Library 362), Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)

Generated Tue Nov 20 06:24:38 2018

Home | New books and articles | Bibliographies | Philosophy journals | Discussions | Article Index | About PhilPapers | API | Contact us | Code of conduct

CDP Phiosophy Documentation Center
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).

Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation

Page generated Wed Nov 21 06:02:09 2018 on pp1