Cited Works

• Barwise, J. & Cooper, R., 1981, “Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 4: 159–219. (Scholar)
• Beaney, M., ed., 1997, The Frege Reader, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Berwick, B. et al., 2011, “Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited”, Cognitive Science, 35: 1207–42. (Scholar)
• Boolos, G., 1998, Logic, Logic, and Logic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Carnap, R., 1950, “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology”, reprinted in R. Carnap, Meaning and Necessity; second edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956. (Scholar)
• Cartwright, R., 1962, “Propositions”, in R. J. Butler, Analytical Philosophy, 1st series, Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1962; reprinted with addenda in Richard Cartwright, Philosophical Essays, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1987. (Scholar)
• Chomsky, N., 1957, Syntactic Structures, The Hague: Mouton. (Scholar)
• –––, 1964, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, The Hague: Mouton. (Scholar)
• –––, 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Dordrecht: Foris. (Scholar)
• –––, 1986, Knowledge of Language, New York: Praeger. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995, The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Davidson, D., 1967a, “Truth and Meaning”, Synthese, 17: 304–23. (Scholar)
• –––, 1967b, “The Logical Form of Action Sentences”, in N. Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1968, “On Saying That”, Synthese, 19: 130–46. (Scholar)
• –––, 1980, Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1984, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Donnellan, K., 1966, “Reference and Definite Descriptions”, Philosophical Review, 75: 281–304. (Scholar)
• Fodor, J., 1978, “Propositional Attitudes”, The Monist, 61: 501–23. (Scholar)
• Frege, G., 1879, Begriffsschrift, reprinted in Beaney 1997. (Scholar)
• –––, 1884, Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik, Breslau: Wilhelm Koebner. English translation, The Foundations of Arithmetic, J. L. Austin (trans). Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974. (Scholar)
• –––, 1891, “Function and Concept”, reprinted in Beaney 1997. (Scholar)
• –––, 1892, “On Sinn and Bedeutung”, reprinted in Beaney 1997. (Scholar)
• Gillon, B., 2007, “Pāṇini’s Aṣṭādhyāyī and Linguistic Theory”, Journal of Indian Philosophy, 35: 445–468.
• Harman, G., 1972, “Logical Form”, Foundations of Language, 9: 38–65. (Scholar)
• –––, 1973, Thought, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Higginbotham, J., 1986, “Linguistic Theory and Davidson’s Program in Semantics”, in E. Lepore (ed.), Truth and Interpretation, pp. 29–48, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Higginbotham, J. & May, R., 1981, “Questions, Quantifiers, and Crossing”, Linguistic Review, 1: 47–79. (Scholar)
• Hornstein, N., 1995, Logical Form: From GB to Minimalism, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Huang, J., 1995, “Logical Form”, in G. Webelhuth (ed.), Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program: Principles and Parameters in Syntactic Theory, pp. 127–175, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Iacona, A., 2018, Logical Form: Between Logic and Natural Language, Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
• Jacobson, P., 1999, “Variable Free Semantics”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 22: 117–84. (Scholar)
• King, J., 2002, “Two Sorts of Claims about Logical Form ” in Preyer and Peter 2002. (Scholar)
• –––, The Nature and Structure of Content, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Keenan, E., 1996, “The Semantics of Determiners”, in S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 41–63. (Scholar)
• Kratzer, A., 1986, “Severing the External Argument from its Verb”, in J. Rooryck and L. Zaring (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 109–137. (Scholar)
• Larson, R. and Ludlow, P., 1993, “Interpreted Logical Forms”, Synthese, 95: 305–55. (Scholar)
• Lepore, E. and Ludwig, K., 2002, “What is Logical Form?”, in Preyer and Peter 2002, pp. 54–90. (Scholar)
• Ludlow, P., 2002, “LF and Natural Logic”, in Preyer and Peter 2002, pp. 132–168. (Scholar)
• May, R., 1985, Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar) (Scholar)
• Montague, R., 1970, “English as a Formal Language”, in R. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974, pp. 7–27. (Scholar)
• Parsons, T., 2014, Articulating Medieval Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Pietroski, P., 2018, Conjoining Meanings, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Preyer, G. and Peter, G. (eds.), 2002, Logical Form and Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Quine, W.V.O., 1950, Methods of Logic, New York: Henry Holt. (Scholar)
• –––, 1951, “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, Philosophical Review, 60: 20–43. (Scholar)
• –––, 1953, “On What There Is”, in From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 1–19. (Scholar)
• –––, 1960, Word and Object, Cambridge MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1970, Philosophy of Logic, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. (Scholar)
• Ramsey, F., 1927, “Facts and Propositions”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary Volume), 7: 153–170. (Scholar)
• Sànchez, V., 1991, Studies on Natural Logic and Categorial Grammar, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam. (Scholar)
• —1994, “Montonicity in Medieval Logic”, Language and Cognition, 4: 161–74. (Scholar)
• Schein, B., 1993, Events and Plurals, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, And: Conjunction Reduction Redux, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Segal, G., 1989, “A Preference for Sense and Reference”, The Journal of Philosophy, 86: 73–89. (Scholar)
• Soames, S., 1987, “Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content”, Philosophical Topics, 15: 47–87. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995, “Beyond Singular Propositions”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 25: 515–50. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, Beyond Rigidity, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Sommers, F., 1984, The Logic of Natural Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Stanley, J., 2000, “Context and Logical Form”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 23: 391–434. (Scholar)
• Strawson, P., 1950, “On Referring”, Mind, 59: 320–44. (Scholar)
• Tarski, A., 1933, “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages”, reprinted in Tarski 1983. (Scholar)
• –––, 1944, “The Semantic Conception of Truth”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4: 341–75. (Scholar)
• –––, 1983, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, J. Corcoran (ed.), J.H. Woodger (trans.), 2nd edition, Indianapolis: Hackett. (Scholar)
• van Benthem, J., 1986, Essays in Logical Semantics, Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
• Wiggins, D., 1980, “‘Most’ and ‘all’: some comments on a familiar programme, and on th clogical form of quantified sentences”, in M. Platts (ed.) Reference, truth and reality: Essays on the philosophy of language, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 318–346. (Scholar)
• Wittgenstein, L., 1921, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, D. Pears and B. McGuinness (trans.), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
• –––, 1953. Philosophical Investigations, New York: Macmillan. (Scholar)

Some Other Useful Works

A few helpful overviews of the history and basic subject matter of logic:

• Kneale, W. & Kneale, M., 1962, The Development of Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press; reprinted 1984. (Scholar)
• Sainsbury, M., 1991, Logical Forms, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Broadie, A., 1987, Introduction to Medieval Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• For these purposes, Russell’s most important books are: Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, London: George Allen and Unwin, 1919; Our Knowledge of the External World, New York: Norton, 1929; and The Philosophy of Logical Atomism, La Salle, Ill: Open Court, 1985. Stephen Neale’s book Descriptions (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990) is a recent development of Russell’s theory. (Scholar)

For introductions to Transformational Grammar and Chomsky’s conception of natural language:

• Radford, A., 1988, Transformational Grammar, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Haegeman, L., 1994, Introduction to Government & Binding Theory, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Lasnik, H. (with M. Depiante and A. Stepanov), 2000, Syntactic Structures Revisited, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)

For discussions of work in linguistics bearing directly on issues of logical form:

• Higginbotham, J., 1985, “On Semantics”, Linguistic Inquiry, 16: 547–93. (Scholar)
• Hornstein, N., 1995, Logical Form: From GB to Minimalism, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Larson, R. and Segal, G., 1995, Knowledge of Meaning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• May, R., 1985, Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Neale, S., 1993, Grammatical Form, Logical Form, and Incomplete Symbols, in A. Irvine & G. Wedeking (eds.), Russell and Analytic Philosophy, Toronto: University of Toronto, pp. 97–139. (Scholar)

For discussions of the Davidsonian program (briefly described in section nine) and appeal to events:

• Davidson, D., 1984, Essays on Truth and Interpretation, Oxford: OUP. (Scholar)
• –––, 1985, “Adverbs of Action”, in B. Vermazen and M. Hintikka (eds.), Essays on Davidson: Actions and Events, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 230–241. (Scholar)
• Evans, G. & McDowell, J. (eds.), 1976, Truth and Meaning, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Higginbotham, J., Pianesi, F. and Varzi, A. (eds.), 2000, Speaking of Events, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Ludwig, K. (ed.), 2003, Contemporary Philosophers in Focus: Donald Davidson, Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres (Scholar)
• Lycan, W., 1984, Logical Form in Natural Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Parsons, T., 1990, Events in the Semantics of English Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Pietroski, P., 2005, Events and Semantic Architecture, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Taylor, B., 1985, Modes of Occurrence, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)