Primary Sources

(Abbreviations are noted for cited primary texts.)

Secondary Sources

• Abbott, Owen, 2020, “The self as the locus of morality: A comparison between Charles Taylor and George Herbert Mead’s theories of the moral constitution of the self,” The Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 50(40): 516–533. [Abbott 2020 available online] (Scholar)
• Aboulafia, Mitchell, 1986, The Mediating Self: Mead, Sartre, and Self-Determination, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
• ––– (ed.), 1991, Philosophy, Social Theory, and the Thought of George Herbert Mead, Albany: SUNY Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, The Cosmopolitan Self: George Herbert Mead and Continental Philosophy, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, Transcendence: On Self-Determination and Cosmopolitanism, Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016, “George Herbert Mead and the Unity of the Self,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 8(1): 201–215. Aboulafia 2016 available online. (Scholar)
• Baggio, Guido, 2016a, “The Influence of Dewey’s and Mead’s Functional Psychology upon Veblen’s Evolutionary Economics,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 8(1): 216–236. [Baggio 2016a available online] (Scholar)
• –––, 2016b, “Sympathy and Empathy: G.H. Mead and the Pragmatist Basis of (Neuro)economics,” in in Pragmatism and Embodied Cognitive Science: From Bodily Intersubjectivity to Symbolic Articulation, eds. Roman Madzia and Matthias Jung. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016c, “The concept of ‘behavior’ in epistemology, psychology, and economics, starting from G.H. Mead,” Paradigmi, 3: 119–133. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, “Sen and Mead on Identity, Agency, and Economic Behaviour,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 9(1): 142–164. [Baggio 2017 available online] (Scholar)
• –––, 2019, “Language, Behaviour, and Empathy: G.H. Mead’s and W.V.O. Quine’s Naturalized Theories of Meaning,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 7: 1–21. (Scholar)
• –––, 2020, “Pragmatism and Verbal Behaviourism: Mead’s and Sellars’ Theories of Meaning and Introspection,” Contemporary Pragmatism, 17(4): 243–267. [Baggio 2020 available online]. (Scholar)
• –––, 2021, “Imagery in action. G.H. Mead’s contribution to sensorimotor enactivism,” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20(5): 935–955. (Scholar)
• Baldwin, John D., 2002, George Herbert Mead: A Unifying Theory for Sociology, Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt. (Scholar)
• Barnes, Stephen, 2002, “The Contemporary Relevance of George Herbert Mead’s Social Psychology and Pedagogy,” Philosophical Studies in Education, 33: 55–63. (Scholar)
• Betz, Joseph, 1974, “George Herbert Mead on Human Rights,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 10(4): 199–223. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, “George Herbert Mead on Social and Economic Human Rights,” in George Herbert Mead in the Twenty-first Century, eds. F. Thomas Burke and Krzysztof P. Skowroñski, Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books. (Scholar)
• Biesta, Gert, 1998, “Mead, Intersubjectivity, and Education: The Early Writings,” Studies in Philosophy and Education, 17(2–3): 73–100. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, “Redefining the Subject, Redefining the Social, Reconsidering Education: George Herbert Mead’s Course on Philosophy of Education at the University of Chicago,” Educational Theory, 49(4): 475–492. (Scholar)
• Blumer, Herbert, 2004, George Herbert Mead and Human Conduct, edited, with an Introduction, by Thomas J. Morrione, Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press. (Scholar)
• Booth, Kelvin J., 2016a, “The Meaning of the Social Body: Bringing George Herbert Mead to Mark Johnson’s Theory of Embodied Mind,” William James Studies, 12(1): 1–18. [Booth 2016a available online] (Scholar)
• –––, 2016b, “Imitation and Taking the Role of the Other,” in The Timeliness of George Herbert Mead, eds. Hans Joas and Daniel R. Huebner, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Burke, F. Thomas and Krzysztof P. Skowroński, eds., 2013, George Herbert Mead in the Twenty-first Century, Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books. (Scholar)
• Cahoone, Lawrance, 2013, “Mead, Joint Attention and the Human Difference,” The Pluralist, 8(2): 1–25. (Scholar)
• –––, 2019, “Mead and the Emergence of the Joint Intentional Self,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 11(2): 196–214. [Cahoone 2019 available online] (Scholar)
• Campbell, James, 1981, “George Herbert Mead on Intelligent Social Reconstruction,” Symbolic Interaction, 4(2): 191–205. (Scholar)
• Clayton, Alfred, 1943, Emergent Mind and Education: A Study of George H. Mead’s Bio-social Behaviorism from an Educational Point of View. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Bureau of Publications. (Scholar)
• Cook, Gary A., 1993, George Herbert Mead, The Making of a Social Pragmatist, Urbana: University of Illinois Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, “Resolving Two Key Problems in Mead’s Mind, Self, and Society,” in George Herbert Mead in the Twenty-first Century, eds. F. Thomas Burke and Krzysztof P. Skowroñski, Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books. (Scholar)
• Cortie, Robert, ed., 1973, The Philosophy of George Herbert Mead, Switzerland: Amriswiler Bücherei, 1973. (Scholar)
• Côté, Jean-François, 2015, George Herbert Mead’s Concept of Society: A Critical Reconstruction, Boulder and London: Paradigm Publishers. (Scholar)
• –––, 2021, “George Herbert Mead’s Pragmatism and Wilhelm Dilthey’s Hermeneutics: Similarities and Differences that Widen and Deepen Sociological Analysis,” The American Sociologist, 52(4): 702–720. (Scholar)
• Deegan, Mary Jo, 1999, “Introduction” in Play, School, and Society, New York: Peter Lang Publishing. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008, Self, War, and Society: George Herbert Mead’s Macrosociology, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. (Scholar)
• Dewey, John, 1932, “Prefatory Remarks,” in George Herbert Mead, The Philosophy of the Present, ed. Arthur E. Murphy, La Salle, IL: Open Court. (Scholar)
• Ezzy, Douglas, 1998, “Theorizing Narrative Identity: Symbolic Interactionism and Hermeneutics,” The Sociological Quarterly, 39(2): 239–252. (Scholar)
• Fietz, Daphne, 2021, “Integrating Meaningful Selfhood into the Sociological Study of Political Languages: Blending Mead’s Pragmatism and Taylor’s Hermeneutics,” The American Sociologist, 52(4): 721–739. (Scholar)
• Fischer, Marilyn, 2008, “Mead and the International Mind,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 44(3): 508–531. (Scholar)
• Gallagher, Timothy J., 2016, “Human-Animal Studies, G.H. Mead, and the Question of Animal Minds,” Society & Animals: Journal of Human-Animal Studies, 24(2): 53-71. (Scholar)
• Geniusas, Saulius, 2006, “Is the Self of Social Behaviorism Capable of Auto-Affection? Mead and Marion on the ‘I’ and the ‘Me,’” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, 42(2): 242–265. (Scholar)
• Gillespie, A., 2005, “G. H. Mead: Theorist of the social act,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35: 19–39. (Scholar)
• Green, Judith, 2013, “Transforming Global Social Habits: G.H. Mead’s Pragmatist Contributions to Democratic Political Economy,” in George Herbert Mead in the Twenty-first Century, eds. F. Thomas Burke and Krzysztof P. Skowroñski, Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books. (Scholar)
• Habermas, Jürgen, 1987, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. II, tr. Thomas McCarthy, Boston: Beacon Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1992, “Individuation through Socialization: On George Herbert Mead’s Theory of Subjectivity,” in Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays, tr. William Mark Hohengarten, Cambridge: MIT Press, 149–204. (Scholar)
• Hanson, Karen, 1986, The Self Imagined: Philosophical reflections on the social character of the psyche, New York and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
• Huebner, Daniel R., 2014, Becoming Mead: The Social Process of Academic Knowledge, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2022, Reintroducing George Herbert Mead, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Jackson, Stevi, 2010, “Self, Time, and Narrative: Rethinking the Contribution of G. H. Mead, Life Writing, 7(2): 123–136. (Scholar)
• James, William, 1890, The Principles of Psychology, Volume One, New York: Henry Holt & Co. 1890. Reprinted, New York: Dover Publications, 1950. (Reprint and the original have the same pagination.) (Scholar)
• –––, 1904, “Does ‘Consciousness’ Exist?”, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods, 1(18): 477–491. Page reference is to the reprinted edition in The Writings of William James, ed. John J. McDermott, New York: Random House, 1968. (Scholar)
• –––, 1905, “The Notion of Consciousness,” Archives de Psychologie, 5(17). Page reference is to the reprinted edition in The Writings of William James, ed. John J. McDermott, New York: Random House, 1968. [This paper was first presented in French at the Fifth International Congress of Psychology, Rome, April, 1905] (Scholar)
• Joas, Hans, 1985, G.H. Mead: A Contemporary Re-examination of his Thought, trs. Raymond Meyer, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Joas, Hans, and Huebner, Daniel R., eds., 2016, The Timeliness of George Herbert Mead, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Jung, Matthias, 1995, “From Dilthey to Mead and Heidegger: Systematic and Historical Relations,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33(4): 661–677. (Scholar)
• Jung, Matthias, and Madzia, Roman, eds., 2016, Pragmatism and Embodied Cognitive Science: From Bodily Intersubjectivity to Symbolic Articulation, Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2016. (Scholar)
• Lake, Danielle, 2020, “Pragmatist Feminism as Philosophic Activism: The [R]evolution of Grace Lee Boggs,” The Pluralist, 15(1): 25–45. (Scholar)
• Lee, Grace Chin, 1945, George Herbert Mead: Philosopher of the Social Individual, New York: King’s Crown Press. (Scholar)
• Lee, Harold N., 1963, “Mead’s doctrine of the past,” Tulane Studies in Philosophy, 12: 52–75. (Scholar)
• Madzia, Roman, 2013a, “Chicago Pragmatism and the Extended Mind Theory: Mead and Dewey on the Nature of Cognition,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 5(1): 195–215. [Madzia 2013a available online] (Scholar)
• –––, 2013b, “Mead and self-embodiment: imitation, simulation, and the problem of taking the attitude of the other,” Österreich Z Soziol, 38: 195–213. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013c, “The Concept of Rule-Following in the Philosophy of George Herbert Mead,” in George Herbert Mead in the Twenty-first Century, eds. F. Thomas Burke and Krzysztof P. Skowroñski, Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015, “Self-construction and Self-awareness: Which One Comes First?,” Pragmatism Today, 6(1): 76–87. [Madzia 2015 available online] (Scholar)
• –––, 2016a, “Presentation and representation: Language, content, and the reconstruction of experience,” in The Timeliness of George Herbert Mead, eds. Hans Joas and Daniel R. Huebner, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016b, “Mind, Symbol, and Action-Prediction: George Herbert Mead and the Embodied Roots of Language,” in Pragmatism and Embodied Cognitive Science: From Bodily Intersubjectivity to Symbolic Articulation, eds. Roman Madzia and Matthias Jung. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, “The humble genius: On the cognitive role of the human hand from the embodied viewpoint,” Pragmatism Today, 8(1): 45–61. [Madzia 2017 available online] (Scholar)
• Martin, Jack, and Gillespie, A., 2010, “A neo-Meadian approach to human agency: Relating the social and the psychological in the ontogenesis of perspective coordinating persons,” Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44: 252–272. (Scholar)
• Martin, Jack, and Sokol, Bryan, 2011, “Generalized others and imaginary audiences: A neo-Meadian approach to adolescent egocentrism,” New Ideas in Psychology, 29(3): 364–375. (Scholar)
• Martin, J., 2005, “Perspectival selves in interaction with others: Re-reading G. H. Mead’s social psychology,” The Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35: 231–253. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, “Re-interpreting internalization and agency through G. H. Mead’s perspectival realism,” Human Development, 49: 65–86. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007a, “Interpreting and extending G. H. Mead’s ‘metaphysics’ of selfhood and agency,” Philosophical Psychology, 20: 441–456. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007b, “Educating Communal Agents: Building on the Perspectivism of G.H. Mead,” Educational Theory, 57(4): 435–452. (Scholar)
• McVeigh, Ryan, 2016, “Basic Level Categories, Mirror Neurons, and Joint-Attention Schemes: Three Points of Intersections Between Mead and Cognitive Science,” Symbolic Interaction, 39(1): 45–65. (Scholar)
• –––, 2020, “The Body in Mind: Mead’s Embodied Cognition,” Symbolic Interaction, 43(3): 493–513. (Scholar)
• Miller, David, 1943, “G.H. Mead’s Conception of “Present,” Philosophy of Science, 10(1): 40–46. (Scholar)
• –––, 1973, George Herbert Mead: Self, Language, and the World, Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press, 1973. Page references are to the reprinted edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980. (Scholar)
• Natanson, Maurice, 1953, “George Herbert Mead’s Metaphysics of Time,” Journal of Philosophy, 50: 770–782. (Scholar)
• –––, 1956, The Social Dynamics of George H. Mead, Introduction by Horace M. Kallen, Washington, D.C.: Public Affairs Press. (Scholar)
• Nungesser, Frithjof, 2016, “Mead Meets Tomasello: Pragmatism, Cognitve Science, and the Origins of Human Communication and Sociality,” in The Timeliness of George Herbert Mead, eds. Hans Joas and Daniel R. Huebner, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Pearce, Trevor, 2020, Pragmatism’s Evolution: Organism and Environment in American Philosophy, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Pfuetze, Paul E., 1961, Self, Society, Existence: Human Nature and Dialogue in the Thought of George Herbert Mead and Martin Buber, New York: Harper and Row, Torchbooks. (Scholar)
• Renger, Paul, 1980, “George Herbert Mead’s Contributions to the Philosophy of American Education,” Educational Theory, 30(2): 115–133. (Scholar)
• Rigney, Ernest G. and Timothy C. Lundy, 2015, “From a Pragmatist’s Point of View: George Herbert Mead’s Unattributed Review of Theodore Merz’s A History of European Thought in the Nineteenth Century,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 7(1): 191–203. [Rigney & Lundy 2015 available online] (Scholar)
• Rosenthal, Sandra B. and Patrick L. Bourgeois, 1991, Mead and Merleau-Ponty: Toward a Common Vision, Albany: SUNY Press. (Scholar)
• Santarelli, Matteo, 2013, “From Others to the Other: A Psychoanalytic Reading of George Herbert Mead,” in George Herbert Mead in the Twenty-first Century, eds. F. Thomas Burke and Krzysztof P. Skowroñski, Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books. (Scholar)
• Shalin, Dmitri, 1988, “G.H. Mead and the Progressive Agenda,” American Journal of Sociology, 93(4): 913–951. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015, “Making the Sociological Canon: The Battle over George Herbert Mead’s Legacy,” The American Sociologist, 46(3): 313–340. (Scholar)
• Silva, Filipe Carreira da, 2007, G.H. Mead: A Critical Introduction, Malden, MA: Polity Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008, Mead and Modernity: Science, Selfhood, and Democratic Politics, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “Introduction,” in G.H. Mead: A Reader, ed. Filipe Carreira da Silva, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Stone, J. E., Carpendale, J. I. M., Sugarman, J., and Martin, J., 2012, “A Meadian account of false belief understanding: Taking a non-mentalistic approach to infant and verbal false belief understanding,” New Ideas in Psychology, 30: 166–178. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, “Mead’s Interpretation of Relativity Theory,” The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 27(2): 153–171. (Scholar)
• Taylor, Scott C., 2019, “G.H. Mead’s Philosophical Hermeneutics of the Present,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 11(2): 215–229. [Taylor 2019 available online] (Scholar)
• Throop, Robert, and Ward, Lloyd Gordon, 2007, “Known Mead Documents,” Toronto: The Mead Project. [Throop & Ward 2007 available online] (Scholar)
• Tomasello, Michael, 2020, “The role of roles in uniquely human cognition and sociality,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 50(2): 2–19. (Scholar)
• Varner, Tess, 2021, “Grace Lee Bogg’s Person-Centered Education for Community-based Change: Feminist Pragmatism, Pedagogy, and Philosophical Activism,” Hypatia, 36: 437–446. (Scholar)
• Waal, Cornelis de, 2001, On Mead, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing. (Scholar)