Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Measurement in Science" by Eran Tal
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Alder, K., 2002, The Measure of All Things: The Seven-Year
Odyssey and Hidden Error That Transformed the World, New York:
The Free Press. (Scholar)
- Alexandrova, A., 2008, “First Person Reports and the Measurement of Happiness”, Philosophical Psychology, 21(5): 571–583. (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, A Philosophy for the Science of Well-Being, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Alexandrova, A. and D.M. Haybron, 2016, “Is Construct Validation Valid?” Philosophy of Science, 83(5): 1098–1109. (Scholar)
- Angner, E., 2008, “The Philosophical Foundations of Subjective Measures of Well-Being”, in Capabilities and Happiness, L. Bruni, F. Comim, and M. Pugno (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, “Is it Possible to Measure Happiness? The argument from measurability”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 3: 221–240. (Scholar)
- Aristotle, Categories, in The Complete Works of
Aristotle, Volume I, J. Barnes (ed.), Princeton: Princeton
University Press, 1984.
- Baird, D., 2004, Thing Knowledge: A Philosophy of Scientific Instruments, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Barwich, A.S., and H. Chang, 2015, “Sensory Measurements: Coordination and Standardization”, Biological Theory, 10(3): 200–211. (Scholar)
- Basso, A., 2017, “The Appeal to Robustness in Measurement Practice”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 65: 57–66. (Scholar)
- Biagioli, F., 2016, Space, Number, and Geometry from Helmholtz to Cassirer, Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
- –––, 2018, “Cohen and Helmholtz on the Foundations of Measurement”, in C. Damböck (ed.), Philosophie Und Wissenschaft Bei Hermann Cohen – Philosophy and Science in Hermann Cohen, Dordrecht: Springer, 77–100. (Scholar)
- BIPM (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures), 2019, The
International System of Units (SI Brochure), 9th Edition.
[BIPM 2019 available online]
(Scholar)
- Bogen, J. and J. Woodward, 1988, “Saving the Phenomena”, The Philosophical Review, 97(3): 303–352. (Scholar)
- Bokulich, A., 2020, “Calibration, Coherence, and Consilience in Radiometric Measures of Geologic Time”, Philosophy of Science, 87(3): 425–56. (Scholar)
- Boring, E.G., 1945, “The use of operational definitions in science”, in Boring et al. 1945: 243–5. (Scholar)
- Boring, E.G., P.W. Bridgman, H. Feigl, H. Israel, C.C Pratt, and
B.F. Skinner, 1945, “Symposium on Operationism”, The
Psychological Review, 52: 241–294. (Scholar)
- Borsboom, D., 2005, Measuring the Mind: Conceptual Issues in Contemporary Psychometrics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Borsboom, D., and G.J. Mellenbergh, 2004, “Why psychometrics
is not pathological: A comment on Michell”, Theory &
Psychology, 14: 105–120. (Scholar)
- Boumans, M., 1999, “Representation and Stability in Testing
and Measuring Rational Expectations”, Journal of Economic
Methodology, 6(3): 381–401. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005a, How Economists Model the World into Numbers, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005b, “Truth versus Precision”, in Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress, P. Hájek, L. Valdés-Villanueva, and D. Westerstahl (eds.), London: College Publications, pp. 257–269. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005c, “Measurement outside the laboratory”, Philosophy of Science, 72: 850–863. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, “The difference between
answering a ‘why’ question and answering a ‘how
much’ question”, in Simulation: Pragmatic Construction
of Reality, J. Lenhard, G Küppers, and T Shinn (eds.),
Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 107–124. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007a, “Invariance and Calibration”, in 2007: 231–248. (Scholar)
- ––– (ed.), 2007b, Measurement in Economics:
A Handbook, London: Elsevier. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Grey-Box Understanding in Economics”, in Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives, H.W. de Regt, S. Leonelli, and K. Eigner, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 210–229. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012a, “Modeling Strategies for
Measuring Phenomena In- and Outside the Laboratory”, in EPSA
Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009 (The European Philosophy of
Science Association Proceedings), H.W. de Regt, S. Hartmann, and S.
Okasha (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1–11. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012b, “Measurement in Economics”, in Philosophy of Economics (Handbook of the Philosophy of Science: Volume 13), University of Mäki (ed.), Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 395–423. (Scholar)
- –––, 2015, Science Outside the Laboratory: Measurement in Field Science and Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Bridgman, P.W., 1927, The Logic of Modern Physics, New York: Macmillan. (Scholar)
- –––, 1938, “Operational Analysis”, Philosophy of Science, 5: 114–131. (Scholar)
- –––, 1945, “Some General Principles of Operational Analysis”, in Boring et al. 1945: 246–249. (Scholar)
- –––, 1956, “The Present State of
Operationalism”, in Frank 1956: 74–79. (Scholar)
- Brillouin, L., 1962, Science and information theory, New York: Academic Press, 2nd edition. (Scholar)
- Byerly, H.C. and V.A. Lazara, 1973, “Realist Foundations of Measurement”, Philosophy of Science, 40(1): 10–28. (Scholar)
- Campbell, N.R., 1920, Physics: the Elements, London: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Campbell, D.T. and D.W. Fiske, 1959, “Convergent and
discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix”,
Psychological Bulletin, 56(2): 81–105. (Scholar)
- Cantù, P. and O. Schlaudt (eds.), 2013, “The
Epistemological Thought of Otto Hölder”, special issue of
Philosophia Scientiæ, 17(1). (Scholar)
- Carnap, R., 1966, Philosophical foundations of physics, G. Martin (ed.), reprinted as An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, NY: Dover, 1995. (Scholar)
- Carrier, M., 1994, The Completeness of Scientific Theories: On
the Derivation of Empirical Indicators Within a Theoretical Framework:
the Case of Physical Geometry, The University of Western Ontario
Series in Philosophy of Science Vol. 53, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
- Cartwright, N.L., 1999, The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Cartwright, N.L. and R. Runhardt, 2014, “Measurement”, in N.L. Cartwright and E. Montuschi (eds.), Philosophy of Social Science: A New Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 265–287. (Scholar)
- Chang, H., 2001, “Spirit, air, and quicksilver: The search
for the ‘real’ scale of temperature”, Historical
Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 31(2):
249–284. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, “Scientific Progress: Beyond Foundationalism and Coherentism”, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 61: 1–20. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Operationalism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2009 Edition), E.N. Zalta (ed.), URL= <Operationalism/" target="other">https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/Operationalism/> (Scholar)
- Chang, H. and N.L. Cartwright, 2008, “Measurement”, in
The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, S. Psillos
and M. Curd (eds.), New York: Routledge, pp. 367–375. (Scholar)
- Clagett, M., 1968, Nicole Oresme and the medieval geometry of
qualities and motions, Madison: University of Wisconsin
Press. (Scholar)
- Cohen, M.R. and E. Nagel, 1934, An introduction to logic and scientific method, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. (Scholar)
- Crease, R.P., 2011, World in the Balance: The Historic Quest
for an Absolute System of Measurement, New York and London: W.W.
Norton. (Scholar)
- Darrigol, O., 2003, “Number and measure: Hermann von Helmholtz at the crossroads of mathematics, physics, and psychology”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 34(3): 515–573. (Scholar)
- de Courtenay, N., O. Darrigol, and O. Schlaudt (eds.), 2019, The Reform of the International System of Units (SI): Philosophical, Historical and Sociological Issues, London and New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- de Courtenay, N. and F. Grégis, 2017, “The evaluation of measurement uncertainties and its epistemological ramifications”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part A), 65: 21–32. (Scholar)
- Diehl, C.E., 2012, The Theory of Intensive Magnitudes in
Leibniz and Kant, Ph.D. Dissertation, Princeton University.
[Diehl 2012 available online] (Scholar)
- Diez, J.A., 1997a, “A Hundred Years of Numbers. An
Historical Introduction to Measurement Theory
1887–1990—Part 1”, Studies in History and
Philosophy of Science, 28(1): 167–185. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997b, “A Hundred Years of Numbers.
An Historical Introduction to Measurement Theory
1887–1990—Part 2”, Studies in History and
Philosophy of Science, 28(2): 237–265. (Scholar)
- Dingle, H., 1950, “A Theory of Measurement”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1(1): 5–26. (Scholar)
- Duhem, P., 1906, The Aim and Structure of Physical
Theory, P.P. Wiener (trans.), New York: Atheneum, 1962. (Scholar)
- Ellis, B., 1966, Basic Concepts of Measurement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Euclid, Elements, in The Thirteen Books of
Euclid’s Elements, T.L. Heath (trans.), Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1908. (Scholar)
- Fechner, G., 1860, Elements of Psychophysics, H.E. Adler
(trans.), New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston, 1966. (Scholar)
- Feest, U., 2005, “Operationism in Psychology: What the Debate Is About, What the Debate Should Be About”, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 41(2): 131–149. (Scholar)
- –––, 2020, “Construct Validity in Psychological Tests–the Case of Implicit Social Cognition”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 10(1): 4. (Scholar)
- Ferguson, A., C.S. Myers, R.J. Bartlett, H. Banister, F.C.
Bartlett, W. Brown, N.R. Campbell, K.J.W. Craik, J. Drever, J. Guild,
R.A. Houstoun, J.O. Irwin, G.W.C. Kaye, S.J.F. Philpott, L.F.
Richardson, J.H. Shaxby, T. Smith, R.H. Thouless, and W.S. Tucker,
1940, “Quantitative estimates of sensory events”,
Advancement of Science, 2: 331–349. (The final report
of a committee appointed by the British Association for the
Advancement of Science in 1932 to consider the possibility of
measuring intensities of sensation. See Michell 1999, Ch 6. for a
detailed discussion.) (Scholar)
- Finkelstein, L., 1975, “Representation by symbol systems as
an extension of the concept of measurement”,
Kybernetes, 4(4): 215–223. (Scholar)
- –––, 1977, “Introductory article”,
(instrument science), Journal of Physics E: Scientific
Instruments, 10(6): 566–572. (Scholar)
- Frank, P.G. (ed.), 1956, The Validation of Scientific Theories. Boston: Beacon Press. (Chapter 2, “The Present State of Operationalism” contains papers by H. Margenau, G. Bergmann, C.G. Hempel, R.B. Lindsay, P.W. Bridgman, R.J. Seeger, and A. Grünbaum) (Scholar)
- Franklin, A., 1986, The Neglect of Experiment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, “Calibration”, Perspectives on Science, 5(1): 31–80. (Scholar)
- Franklin, A., M. Anderson, D. Brock, S. Coleman, J. Downing, A. Gruvander, J. Lilly, J. Neal, D. Peterson, M. Price, R. Rice, L. Smith, S. Speirer, and D. Toering, 1989, “Can a Theory-Laden Observation Test the Theory?”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 40(2): 229–231. (Scholar)
- Frigerio, A., A. Giordani, and L. Mari, 2010, “Outline of a general model of measurement”, Synthese, 175(2): 123–149. (Scholar)
- Galison, P., 2003, Einstein’s Clocks,
Poincaré’s Maps: Empires of Time, New York and
London: W.W. Norton. (Scholar)
- Gillies, D.A., 1972, “Operationalism”, Synthese, 25(1): 1–24. (Scholar)
- Giordani, A., and L. Mari, 2012, “Measurement, models, and uncertainty”, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 61(8): 2144–2152. (Scholar)
- Gooday, G., 2004, The Morals of Measurement: Accuracy, Irony
and Trust in Late Victorian Electrical Practice, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Grant, E., 1996, The foundations of modern science in the
middle ages, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Grattan-Guinness, I., 1996, “Numbers, magnitudes, ratios,
and proportions in Euclid’s Elements: How did he handle
them?”, Historia Mathematica, 23: 355–375. (Scholar)
- Grégis, F., 2015, “Can We Dispense with the Notion of
‘True Value’ in Metrology?”, in Schlaudt and Huber
2015, 81–93. (Scholar)
- Guala, F., 2008, “Paradigmatic Experiments: The Ultimatum Game from Testing to Measurement Device”, Philosophy of Science, 75: 658–669. (Scholar)
- Hacking, I, 1983, Representing and Intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Harré, R., 1981, Great Scientific Experiments: Twenty Experiments that Changed our View of the World, Oxford: Phaidon Press. (Scholar)
- Hartley, R.V., 1928, “Transmission of information”,
Bell System technical journal, 7(3): 535–563. (Scholar)
- Heidelberger, M., 1993a, Nature from Within: Gustav Theodore
Fechner and His Psychophysical Worldview, C. Klohr (trans.),
Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2004. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993b, “Fechner’s impact for
measurement theory”, commentary on D.J. Murray, “A
perspective for viewing the history of psychophysics”,
Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 16(1): 146–148. (Scholar)
- von Helmholtz, H., 1887, Counting and measuring, C.L.
Bryan (trans.), New Jersey: D. Van Nostrand, 1930. (Scholar)
- Hempel, C.G., 1952, Fundamentals of concept formation in
empirical science, International Encyclopedia of Unified Science,
Vol. II. No. 7, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1956, “A logical appraisal of
operationalism”, in Frank 1956: 52–67.
- –––, 1966, Philosophy of Natural Science, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
- Hölder, O., 1901, “Die Axiome der Quantität und
die Lehre vom Mass”, Berichte über die Verhandlungen
der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu
Leipzig, Mathematische-Physische Klasse, 53: 1–64. (for an
excerpt translated into English see Michell and Ernst 1996) (Scholar)
- Hood, S.B., 2009, “Validity in Psychological Testing and
Scientific Realism”, Theory & Psychology, 19(4):
451–473. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, “Psychological Measurement and Methodological Realism”, Erkenntnis, 78(4): 739–761. (Scholar)
- Hoover, K. and M. Dowell, 2001, “Measuring Causes: Episodes
in the Quantitative Assessment of the Value of Money”, in
The Age of Economic Measurement (Supplement to History of
Political Economy: Volume 33), J. Klein and M. Morgan (eds.), pp.
137–161. (Scholar)
- Isaac, A.M. C., 2017, “Hubris to Humility: Tonal Volume and the Fundamentality of Psychophysical Quantities”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part A), 65–66: 99–111. (Scholar)
- Israel-Jost, V., 2011, “The Epistemological Foundations of Scientific Observation”, South African Journal of Philosophy, 30(1): 29–40. (Scholar)
- JCGM (Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology), 2012,
International Vocabulary of Metrology—Basic and general
concepts and associated terms (VIM), 3rd edition with minor
corrections, Sèvres: JCGM.
[JCGM 2012 available online] (Scholar)
- Jorgensen, L.M., 2009, “The Principle of Continuity and
Leibniz’s Theory of Consciousness”, Journal of the
History of Philosophy, 47(2): 223–248. (Scholar)
- Jung, E., 2011, “Intension and Remission of Forms”, in Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy, H. Lagerlund (ed.), Netherlands: Springer, pp. 551–555. (Scholar)
- Kant, I., 1787, Critique of Pure Reason, P. Guyer and A.W. Wood (trans.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. (Scholar)
- Kirpatovskii, S.I., 1974, “Principles of the information
theory of measurements”, Izmeritel’naya Tekhnika,
5: 11–13, English translation in Measurement
Techniques, 17(5): 655–659. (Scholar)
- Krantz, D.H., R.D. Luce, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky, 1971,
Foundations of Measurement Vol 1: Additive and Polynomial
Representations, San Diego and London: Academic Press. (For
references to the two other volumes see Suppes et al. 1989 and Luce et
al. 1990.) (Scholar)
- von Kries, J., 1882, “Über die Messung intensiver
Grösse und über das sogenannte psychophysiches
Gesetz”, Vierteljahrschrift für wissenschaftliche
Philosophie (Leipzig), 6: 257–294. (Scholar)
- Kuhn, T.S., 1961, “The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Sciences”, Isis, 52(2): 161–193. (Scholar)
- Kyburg, H.E. Jr., 1984, Theory and Measurement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Latour, B., 1987, Science in Action, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Leplège, A., 2003, “Epistemology of Measurement in
the Social Sciences: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives”,
Social Science Information, 42: 451–462. (Scholar)
- Luce, R.D., D.H. Krantz, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky, 1990,
Foundations of Measurement (Volume 3: Representation,
Axiomatization, and Invariance), San Diego and London: Academic Press.
(For references to the two other volumes see Krantz et al. 1971 and
Suppes et al. 1989.) (Scholar)
- Luce, R.D., and J.W. Tukey, 1964, “Simultaneous conjoint
measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement”, Journal
of mathematical psychology, 1(1): 1–27. (Scholar)
- Luce, R.D. and P. Suppes, 2004, “Representational
Measurement Theory”, in Stevens’ Handbook of
Experimental Psychology (Volume 4: Methodology in Experimental
Psychology), J. Wixted and H. Pashler (eds.), New York: Wiley, 3rd
edition, pp. 1–41. (Scholar)
- Lusk, G., 2016, “Computer simulation and the features of novel empirical data”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 56: 145–152. (Scholar)
- Mach, E., 1896, Principles of the Theory of Heat, T.J.
McCormack (trans.), Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1986. (Scholar)
- Mari, L., 1999, “Notes towards a qualitative analysis of
information in measurement results”, Measurement,
25(3): 183–192. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, “Beyond the representational viewpoint: a new formalization of measurement”, Measurement, 27: 71–84. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, “Epistemology of Measurement”, Measurement, 34: 17–30. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005a, “The problem of foundations of measurement”, Measurement, 38: 259–266. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005b, “Models of the Measurement
Process”, in Handbook of Measuring Systems Design, vol.
2, P. Sydenman and R. Thorn (eds.), Wiley, Ch. 104. (Scholar)
- Mari, L., and M. Wilson, 2014, “An introduction to the Rasch
measurement approach for metrologists”, Measurement,
51: 315–327. (Scholar)
- Mari, L. and A. Giordani, 2013, “Modeling measurement: error
and uncertainty,”, in Error and Uncertainty in Scientific
Practice, M. Boumans, G. Hon, and A. Petersen (eds.), Ch. 4. (Scholar)
- Maxwell, J.C., 1873, A Treatise on Electricity and
Magnetism, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- McClimans, L., 2010, “A theoretical framework for
patient-reported outcome measures”, Theoretical Medicine and
Bioethics, 31: 225–240.
- –––, 2017, “Psychological Measures, Risk,
and Values”, In Measurement in Medicine: Philosophical
Essays on Assessment and Evaluation, L. McClimans (ed.), London
and New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 89–106. (Scholar)
- McClimans, L. and P. Browne, 2012, “Quality of life is a
process not an outcome”, Theoretical Medicine and
Bioethics, 33: 279–292. (Scholar)
- McClimans, L., J. Browne, and S. Cano, 2017, “Clinical Outcome Measurement: Models, Theory, Psychometrics and Practice”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part A), 65: 67–73. (Scholar)
- Michel, M., 2019, “The Mismeasure of Consciousness: A
Problem of Coordination for the Perceptual Awareness Scale”,
Philosophy of Science, 86(5): 1239–49. (Scholar)
- Michell, J., 1993, “The origins of the representational theory of measurement: Helmholtz, Hölder, and Russell”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part A), 24(2): 185–206. (Scholar)
- –––, 1994, “Numbers as Quantitative Relations and the Traditional Theory of Measurement”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45: 389–406. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, Measurement in Psychology: Critical History of a Methodological Concept, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, “Normal science, pathological
science and psychometrics”, Theory & Psychology,
10: 639–667. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, “Epistemology of Measurement:
the Relevance of its History for Quantification in the Social
Sciences”, Social Science Information, 42(4):
515–534. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004a, “History and philosophy of
measurement: A realist view”, in Proceedings of the 10th
IMEKO TC7 International symposium on advances of measurement
science,
[Michell 2004 available online] (Scholar)
- –––, 2004b, “Item response models,
pathological science and the shape of error: Reply to Borsboom and
Mellenbergh”, Theory & Psychology, 14:
121–129. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005, “The logic of measurement: A realist overview”, Measurement, 38(4): 285–294. (Scholar)
- Michell, J. and C. Ernst, 1996, “The Axioms of Quantity and
the Theory of Measurement”, Journal of Mathematical
Psychology, 40: 235–252. (This article contains a
translation into English of a long excerpt from Hölder
1901.) (Scholar)
- Mitchell, D.J., E. Tal, and H. Chang, 2017, “The Making of
Measurement: Editors’ Introduction.” Studies in
History and Philosophy of Science (Part A), 65–66:
1–7. (Scholar)
- Miyake, T., 2017, “Uncertainty and Modeling in
Seismology”, in Mößner & Nordmann (eds.) 2017,
232–244. (Scholar)
- Morgan, M., 2001, “Making measuring instruments”, in
The Age of Economic Measurement (Supplement to History of
Political Economy: Volume 33), J.L. Klein and M. Morgan (eds.),
pp. 235–251. (Scholar)
- Morgan, M. and M. Morrison (eds.), 1999, Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Morrison, M., 1999, “Models as Autonomous Agents”, in
Morgan and Morrison 1999: 38–65. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Models, measurement and computer simulation: the changing face of experimentation”, Philosophical Studies, 143: 33–57. (Scholar)
- Morrison, M. and M. Morgan, 1999, “Models as Mediating
Instruments”, in Morgan and Morrison 1999: 10–37. (Scholar)
- Mößner, N. and A. Nordmann (eds.), 2017, Reasoning in Measurement, London and New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Mundy, B., 1987, “The metaphysics of quantity”, Philosophical Studies, 51(1): 29–54. (Scholar)
- Nagel, E., 1931, “Measurement”, Erkenntnis, 2(1): 313–333. (Scholar)
- Narens, L., 1981, “On the scales of measurement”,
Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 24: 249–275. (Scholar)
- –––, 1985, Abstract Measurement Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Nunnally, J.C., and I.H. Bernstein, 1994, Psychometric
Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill, 3rd edition. (Scholar)
- Padovani, F., 2015, “Measurement, Coordination, and the Relativized a Priori”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics), 52: 123–28. (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, “Coordination and Measurement: What We Get Wrong About What Reichenbach Got Right”, In M. Massimi, J.W. Romeijn, and G. Schurz (eds.), EPSA15 Selected Papers (European Studies in Philosophy of Science), Cham: Springer International Publishing, 49–60. (Scholar)
- Parker, W., 2017, “Computer Simulation, Measurement, and Data Assimilation”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 68(1): 273–304. (Scholar)
- Poincaré, H., 1898, “The Measure of Time”, in
The Value of Science, New York: Dover, 1958, pp.
26–36. (Scholar)
- –––, 1902, Science and Hypothesis, W.J.
Greenstreet (trans.), New York: Cosimo, 2007. (Scholar)
- Porter, T.M., 1995, Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, “Precision”, in Boumans
2007b: 343–356. (Scholar)
- Rasch, G., 1960, Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence
and Achievement Tests, Copenhagen: Danish Institute for
Educational Research. (Scholar)
- Reiss, J., 2001, “Natural Economic Quantities and Their
Measurement”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 8(2):
287–311. (Scholar)
- Riordan, S., 2015, “The Objectivity of Scientific Measures”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part A), 50: 38–47. (Scholar)
- Reichenbach, H., 1927, The Philosophy of Space and Time,
New York: Dover Publications, 1958. (Scholar)
- Rothbart, D. and S.W. Slayden, 1994, “The Epistemology of a Spectrometer”, Philosophy of Science, 61: 25–38. (Scholar)
- Russell, B., 1903, The Principles of Mathematics, New York: W.W. Norton. (Scholar)
- Savage, C.W. and P. Ehrlich, 1992, “A brief introduction to
measurement theory and to the essays”, in Philosophical and
Foundational Issues in Measurement Theory, C.W. Savage and P.
Ehrlich (eds.), New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 1–14.
- Schaffer, S., 1992, “Late Victorian metrology and its
instrumentation: a manufactory of Ohms”, in Invisible
Connections: Instruments, Institutions, and Science, R. Bud and
S.E. Cozzens (eds.), Cardiff: SPIE Optical Engineering, pp.
23–56. (Scholar)
- Schlaudt, O. and Huber, L. (eds.), 2015, Standardization in Measurement: Philosophical, Historical and Sociological Issues, London and New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Scott, D. and P. Suppes, 1958, “Foundational aspects of theories of measurement”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 23(2): 113–128. (Scholar)
- Shannon, C.E., 1948, “A Mathematical Theory of Communication”, The Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379–423 and 623–656. (Scholar)
- Shannon, C.E. and W. Weaver, 1949, A Mathematical Theory of Communication, Urbana: The University of Illinois Press. (Scholar)
- Shapere, D., 1982, “The Concept of Observation in Science and Philosophy”, Philosophy of Science, 49(4): 485–525. (Scholar)
- Skinner, B.F., 1945, “The operational analysis of psychological terms”, in Boring et al. 1945: 270–277. (Scholar)
- Soler, L., F. Wieber, C. Allamel-Raffin, J.L. Gangloff, C. Dufour, and E. Trizio, 2013, “Calibration: A Conceptual Framework Applied to Scientific Practices Which Investigate Natural Phenomena by Means of Standardized Instruments”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 44(2): 263–317. (Scholar)
- Staley, K. W., 2020, “Securing the empirical value of measurement results”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 71(1): 87–113. (Scholar)
- Stegenga, J., 2018, Medical Nihilism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Stevens, S.S., 1935, “The operational definition of psychological concepts”, Psychological Review, 42(6): 517–527. (Scholar)
- –––, 1946, “On the theory of scales of
measurement”, Science, 103: 677–680. (Scholar)
- –––, 1951, “Mathematics, Measurement,
Psychophysics”, in Handbook of Experimental Psychology,
S.S. Stevens (ed.), New York: Wiley & Sons, pp. 1–49. (Scholar)
- –––, 1959, “Measurement, psychophysics and
utility”, in Measurement: Definitions and Theories,
C.W. Churchman and P. Ratoosh (eds.), New York: Wiley & Sons, pp.
18–63. (Scholar)
- –––, 1975, Psychophysics: Introduction to
Its Perceptual, Neural and Social Prospects, New York: Wiley
& Sons. (Scholar)
- Suppes, P., 1951, “A set of independent axioms for extensive
quantities”, Portugaliae Mathematica, 10(4):
163–172.
- –––, 1960, “A Comparison of the Meaning
and Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences”,
Synthese, 12(2): 287–301. (Scholar)
- –––, 1962, “Models of Data”, in
Logic, methodology and philosophy of science: proceedings of the
1960 International Congress, E. Nagel (ed.), Stanford: Stanford
University Press, pp. 252–261. (Scholar)
- –––, 1967, “What is a Scientific
Theory?”, in Philosophy of Science Today, S.
Morgenbesser (ed.), New York: Basic Books, pp. 55–67. (Scholar)
- Suppes, P., D.H. Krantz, R.D. Luce, and A. Tversky, 1989,
Foundations of Measurement Vol 2: Geometrical, Threshold and
Probabilistic Representations, San Diego and London: Academic
Press. (For references to the two other volumes see Krantz et al. 1971
and Luce et al. 1990.) (Scholar)
- Swoyer, C., 1987, “The Metaphysics of Measurement”, in Measurement, Realism and Objectivity, J. Forge (ed.), Reidel, pp. 235–290. (Scholar)
- Sylla, E., 1971, “Medieval quantifications of qualities: The
‘Merton School’”, Archive for history of exact
sciences, 8(1): 9–39. (Scholar)
- Tabor, D., 1970, “The hardness of solids”, Review
of Physics in Technology, 1(3): 145–179. (Scholar)
- Tal, E., 2011, “How Accurate Is the Standard Second?”, Philosophy of Science, 78(5): 1082–96. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, “Old and New Problems in Philosophy of Measurement”, Philosophy Compass, 8(12): 1159–1173. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016a, “Making Time: A Study in the Epistemology of Measurement”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 67(1): 297–335 (Scholar)
- –––, 2016b, “How Does Measuring Generate
Evidence? The Problem of Observational Grounding”, Journal
of Physics: Conference Series, 772: 012001. (Scholar)
- –––, 2017a, “A Model-Based Epistemology of
Measurement”, in Mößner & Nordmann (eds.) 2017,
233–253. (Scholar)
- –––, 2017b, “Calibration: Modelling the Measurement Process”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part A), 65: 33–45. (Scholar)
- –––, 2018, “Naturalness and Convention in
the International System of Units”, Measurement, 116:
631–643. (Scholar)
- Teller, P., 2013, “The concept of measurement-precision”, Synthese, 190: 189–202. (Scholar)
- –––, 2018, “Measurement Accuracy Realism”, in I. Peschard and B.C. van Fraassen (eds.), The Experimental Side of Modeling, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 273–98. (Scholar)
- Thomson, W., 1889, “Electrical Units of Measurement”,
in Popular Lectures and Addresses (Volume 1), London:
MacMillan, pp. 73–136. (Scholar)
- Trout, J.D., 1998, Measuring the intentional world: Realism, naturalism, and quantitative methods in the behavioral sciences, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, “Measurement”, in A Companion to the Philosophy of Science, W.H. Newton-Smith (ed.), Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 265–276. (Scholar)
- van Fraassen, B.C., 1980, The Scientific Image, Oxford:
Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008, Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “The perils of Perrin, in the hands of philosophers”, Philosophical Studies, 143: 5–24. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Modeling and Measurement: The Criterion of Empirical Grounding”, Philosophy of Science, 79(5): 773–784. (Scholar)
- Vessonen, E., 2019. “Operationalism and Realism in Psychometrics”, Philosophy Compass, 14(10): e12624. (Scholar)
- –––, 2020, “The Complementarity of Psychometrics and the Representational Theory of Measurement”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 71(2): 415–442. (Scholar)
- Wilson, M., 2013, “Using the concept of a measurement system
to characterize measurement models used in psychometrics”,
Measurement, 46(9): 3766–3774. (Scholar)
- Wise, M.N. (ed.), 1995, The Values of Precision, NJ:
Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Wise, M.N. and C. Smith, 1986, “Measurement, Work and
Industry in Lord Kelvin’s Britain”, Historical Studies
in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 17(1):
147–173. (Scholar)
- Wolff, J. E., 2020a, The Metaphysics of Quantities, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2020b, “Heaps of Moles? – Mediating Macroscopic and Microscopic Measurement of Chemical Substances”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part A), 80: 19–27. (Scholar)