Linked bibliography for the SEP article "The Definition of Morality" by Bernard Gert and Joshua Gert
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Alexander, Richard, 1987, The Biology of Moral Systems, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Anscombe, G. E. M., 1958, “Modern Moral Philosophy”, Philosophy, 33(124): 1–19. doi:10.1017/s0031819100037943 (Scholar)
- Aquinas, Thomas, c.1270, Summa Theologiae, Paris. (Scholar)
- Baier, Kurt, 1958, The Moral Point of View, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- Baumard, Nicolas, Jean-Baptiste André, and Dan Sperber, 2013, “A Mutualistic Approach to Morality: The Evolution of Fairness by Partner Choice”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(1): 59–78. doi:10.1017/s0140525x11002202 (Scholar)
- Bentham, Jeremy, 1789, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, New York: Prometheus Books, 1988. (Scholar)
- Brink, David, 1997, “Kantian Rationalism: Inescapability, Authority, and Supremacy”, in Ethics and Practical Reason, Garrett Cullity and Berys Gaut (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 255–291. (Scholar)
- Churchland, Patricia, 2011, Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Curry, Oliver Scott, 2016, “Morality as Cooperation: A Problem-Centred Approach”, in The Evolution of Morality, Todd K. Shackelford and Ranald Hansen (eds.), Cham: Springer, pp. 27–51. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19671-8_2 (Scholar)
- Darwall, Stephen, 2006, The Second-person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- De Waal, Frans, 1996, Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Doris, John M. and The Moral Psychology Research Group (eds.), 2010, The Moral Psychology Handbook, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199582143.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Durkheim, Émile, 1906 [2009], “La Détermination du fait moral”. Collected in Sociologie et Philosophie, Paris: Félix Alcan, 1924. Translated as “The Determination of Moral Facts” in Sociology and Philosophy, David Pocock (ed. and trans.), 1953, Reprinted Routledge revivals. London: Routledge, 2009, pp. 16–31. (Scholar)
- Dworkin, Ronald, 1986, Law’s Empire, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. (Scholar)
- Dwyer, Susan, Bryce Huebner, and Marc D. Hauser, 2010, “The Linguistic Analogy: Motivations, Results, and Speculations”, Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3): 486–510. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01064.x (Scholar)
- Edel, Abraham, 1962, “Anthropology and Ethics in Common Focus”, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 92(1): 55–72. doi:10.2307/2844321 (Scholar)
- Finnis, John, 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Foot, Philippa, 1958a, “Moral Beliefs”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 59: 83–104. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/59.1.83 (Scholar)
- –––, 1958b, “Moral Arguments”, Mind, 67(268): 502–513. doi:10.1093/mind/lxvii.268.502 (Scholar)
- –––, 1972, “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives”, The Philosophical Review, 81(3): 305–316. doi:10.2307/2184328 (Scholar)
- Frankena, William, 1963, “Recent Conceptions of Morality”, in G. Nakhnikian and H. Castañeda (eds.), Morality and the Language of Conduct, Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, pp. 1–24. (Scholar)
- –––, 1973, Ethics, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
- –––, 1980, Thinking about Morality, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. (Scholar)
- Gert, Bernard, 2005, Morality: Its Nature and Justification, Revised Edition, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Gibbard, Allan, 1990, Wise Choices, Apt Feelings, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Goldman, Alan H., 2009, Reasons from Within: Desires and Values, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199576906.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Gray, Kurt, Liane Young, and Adam Waytz, 2012, “Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality”, Psychological Inquiry, 23(2): 101–124. doi:10.1080/1047840x.2012.651387 (Scholar)
- Greene, Joshua, 2013, Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and The Gap between Us and Them, New York: Penguin. (Scholar)
- Haidt, Jonathan, 2006, The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion, New York: Pantheon. (Scholar)
- Haidt, Jonathan and Selin Kesebir, 2010, “Morality”, in S. Fiske, D. Gilbert, and G. Lindzey (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th Edition, Hobeken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 797–832. (Scholar)
- Hare, R.M., 1952, The Language of Morals, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1963, Freedom and Reason, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1981, Moral Thinking, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Harman, Gilbert, 1975, “Moral Relativism Defended”, The Philosophical Review, 84(1): 3–22. doi:10.2307/2184078 (Scholar)
- Hauser, Marc, 2006, Moral Minds: How Nature Designed our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong, New York: Harper Collins. (Scholar)
- Hobbes, Thomas, 1660 [1994], Leviathan, edited by Edwin Curly, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1994. (Scholar)
- –––, 1658 and 1651 [1991], Man and Citizen, (translations of six chapters of De Homine (1658) and all of De Cive (1651)), edited by Bernard Gert, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1991. (Scholar)
- Hooker, Brad, 2001, Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule Consequentialist theory of Morality, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Hume, David, 1751 [1975], Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals, edited by L.A. Selby-Bigge, 3rd edition revised by P.H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975. (Scholar)
- Kant, Immanuel, 1785 and 1797 [1993], Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: with On a Supposed Right to Lie because of Philanthropic Concerns, 3rd edition, translated by J. Ellington, Indianapolis: Hackett, 1993. (Scholar)
- Kelly, Daniel, Stephen Stich, Kevin J. Haley, Serena J. Eng, and Daniel M. T. Fessler, 2007, “Harm, Affect, and the Moral/Conventional Distinction”, Mind & Language, 22(2): 117–131. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00302.x (Scholar)
- Klenk, Michael, 2019, “Moral Philosophy and the ‘Ethical Turn’ in Anthropology”, Zeitschrift Für Ethik Und Moralphilosophie, 2(2): 331–353. doi:10.1007/s42048-019-00040-9 (Scholar)
- Laidlaw, James, 2016, “The Interactional Foundations of Ethics and the Formation and Limits of Morality Systems”, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(1): 455–461. doi:10.14318/hau6.1.024 (Scholar)
- Liao, S. Matthew (ed.), 2016, Moral Brains. The Neuroscience of Morality, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199357666.001.0001 (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, Dependent Rational Animals, Chicago: Open Court. (Scholar)
- Machery, Edouard, 2012, “Delineating the Moral Domain”, Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, 7(1): 1–14. doi:10.4148/biyclc.v7i0.1777 (Scholar)
- Machery, Edouard and Ron Mallon, 2010, “The Evolution of Morality”, in Doris and The Moral Psychology Research Group 2010: 3–46. (Scholar)
- MacIntyre, Alasdair, 1957, “What Morality Is Not”, Philosophy, 32(123): 325–335. doi:10.1017/s0031819100051950 (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, Dependent Rational Animals, Chicago: Open Court. (Scholar)
- Mikhail, John, 2007, “Universal Moral Grammar: Theory, Evidence and the Future”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(4): 143–152. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.007 (Scholar)
- Mill, John Stuart, 1861 [2002], Utilitarianism, edited by G. Sher, Indianapolis: Hackett, 2002. (Scholar)
- Moore, G.E., 1912, Ethics, New York: H. Holt. (Scholar)
- –––, 1903, Principia Ethica, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993. (Scholar)
- Prinz, Jesse, 2007, The Emotional Construction of Morals, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Prinz, Jesse and Shaun Nichols, 2010, “Moral Emotions”, in Doris and The Moral Psychology Research Group 2010: 111–146. (Scholar)
- Rawls, John, 1971, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Roedder, Erica and Gilbert Harman, 2010, “Linguistics and Moral Theory”, in Doris and The Moral Psychology Research Group 2010: 273–296. (Scholar)
- Scanlon, T. M., 1982, “Contractualism and Utilitarianism”, in Utilitarianism and Beyond, Amartya Sen and Bernard Williams (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 103–128. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511611964.007 (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “What is Morality?” in J. Shephard, S. Kosslyn, and E. Hammonds (eds.), The Harvard Sampler: Liberal Education for the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 243–66. (Scholar)
- Sidgwick, Henry, 1874, Methods of Ethics, Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co., 1981. (Scholar)
- Singer, Peter, 1993, Practical Ethics, 2nd Edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (ed.), 2008, Moral Psychology Volume 1, The Evolution of Morality: Adaptations and Innateness, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, “The Disunity of Morality”, in Liao 2016: 331–354. (Scholar)
- Skorupski, John, 1993, “The Definition of Morality”, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 35: 121–144. doi:10.1017/s1358246100006299 (Scholar)
- Smart, J. J. C., 1956, “Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 6(25): 344–354. doi:10.2307/2216786 (Scholar)
- Smith, Michael, 1994, The Moral Problem, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Sprigge, Timothy L. S., 1964, “Definition of a Moral Judgment”, Philosophy, 39(150): 301–322. doi:10.1017/s0031819100055777 (Scholar)
- Strawson, P. F., 1961, “Social Morality and Individual Ideal”, Philosophy, 36(136): 1–17. doi:10.1017/s003181910005779x (Scholar)
- Thomson, J.J. and G. Dworkin (eds.), 1968, Ethics, New York: Harper & Row. (Scholar)
- Toulmin, Stephen, 1950, An Examination of the Place of Reason in Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Turiel, Elliot, 1983, The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Warnock, Geoffrey, 1971, The Object of Morality, London: Methuen. (Scholar)
- Westermarck, Edward, 1960, Ethical Relativity, Paterson, N.J.: Littlefield, Adams. (Scholar)
- Williams, Bernard, 1985, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, London: Fontana. (Scholar)
- Wong, David B., 1984, Moral Relativity, Berkeley CA: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, Natural Moralities: A Defense of Pluralistic Relativism, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0195305396.001.0001 (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, “Integrating Philosophy with Anthropology in an Approach to Morality”, Anthropological Theory, 14(3): 336–355. doi:10.1177/1463499614534554 (Scholar)
- Wren, T.E. (ed.), 1990, The Moral Domain: Essays in the Ongoing Discussion Between Philosophy and the Social Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
