Linked bibliography for the SEP article "The Definition of Morality" by Bernard Gert and Joshua Gert
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Anscombe, Elizabeth, 1958, “Modern Moral Philosophy”, Philosophy, 33(124): 1–19. (Scholar)
- Aquinas, Thomas, c.1270, Summa Theologiae. (Scholar)
- Baier, Kurt, 1958, The Moral Point of View, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- Bentham, Jeremy, 1789, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, New York: Prometheus Books, 1988. (Scholar)
- Brink, David, 1997, “Kantian Rationalism: Inescapability, Authority, and Supremacy”, in Ethics and Practical Reason, G. Cullity and B. Gaut (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 255–291. (Scholar)
- Cooper, Neil, 1966, “Two Concepts of Morality”, Philosophy, 41(155): 19–33. (Scholar)
- Darwall, Stephen, 2005, The Second-person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- De Waal, Frans, 1996, Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Dworkin, Ronald, 1986, Law’s Empire (Legal Theory), Belknap Press. (Scholar)
- Finnis, John, 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Foot, Philippa, 1958a, “Moral Beliefs”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 59: 83–104. (Scholar)
- –––, 1958b, “Moral Arguments”, Mind, 67(268): 502–513. (Scholar)
- –––, 1972, “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives”, Philosophical Review, 81: 305–16. (Scholar)
- Frankena, William, 1963, “Recent Conceptions of Morality”, in G. Nakhnikian and H. Castañeda (eds.), Morality and the Language of Conduct, Detroit: Wayne State University Press, pp. 1–24. (Scholar)
- –––, 1973, Ethics, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
- –––, 1980, Thinking about Morality, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. (Scholar)
- Gert, Bernard, 2005, Morality: Its Nature and Justification, Revised Edition, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Gibbard, Allan, 1990, Wise Choices, Apt Feelings, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Goldman, Alan, 2009, Reasons from Within: Desires and Values, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Haidt, Jonathan, 2006, The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
- Haji, Ishtiyaque, 2003, “The Emotional Depravity of Psychopaths and Culpability”, Legal Theory, 9(1): 63–82. (Scholar)
- Hare, R.M., 1952, The Language of Morals, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1963, Freedom and Reason, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1981, Moral Thinking, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Harman, Gilbert, 1975, “Moral Relativism Defended”, Philosophical Review, 84: 3–22. (Scholar)
- Hauser, Marc, 2006, Moral Minds: How Nature Designed our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong, New York: Harper Collins. (Scholar)
- Hobbes, Thomas, 1660 [1994], Leviathan, edited by Edwin Curly, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1994. (Scholar)
- –––, 1658 and 1651 [1991], Man and Citizen, (translations of six chapters of De Homine (1658) and all of De Cive (1651)), edited by Bernard Gert, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1991. (Scholar)
- Hooker, Brad, 2001, Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule Consequentialist theory of Morality, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Hume, David, 1751 [1975], Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals, edited by L.A. Selby-Bigge, 3rd edition revised by P.H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975. (Scholar)
- Kant, Immanuel, 1785 and 1797 [1993], Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: with On a Supposed Right to Lie because of Philanthropic Concerns, 3rd edition, translated by J. Ellington, Indianapolis: Hackett, 1993. (Scholar)
- Levy, Neil, 2007, “The Responsibility of the Psychopath Revisited”, Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 14(2): 129–138. (Scholar)
- MacIntyre, Alasdair, 1957, “What Morality is Not”, Philosophy, 32(123): 325–35. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, Dependent Rational Animals, Chicago: Open Court. (Scholar)
- Mill, John Stuart, 1861 [2002], Utilitarianism, edited by G. Sher, Indianapolis: Hackett, 2002. (Scholar)
- Moore, G.E., 1912, Ethics, New York: H. Holt. (Scholar)
- –––, 1903, Principia Ethica, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993. (Scholar)
- Prinz, Jesse, 2007, The Emotional Construction of Morals, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Rawls, John, 1971, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Scanlon, T.M., 1982, “Contractualism and Utilitarianism”, in A. Sen and B. Williams (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–28. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011, “What is Morality?” in J. Shephard, S. Kosslyn, and E. Hammonds (eds.), The Harvard Sampler: Liberal Education for the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 243–66. (Scholar)
- Sidgwick, Henry, 1874, Methods of Ethics, Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co., 1981. (Scholar)
- Singer, Peter, 1993, Practical Ethics, 2nd Edition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (ed.), 2008, Moral Psychology Volume 1, The Evolution of Morality: Adaptations and Innateness, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Skorupski, John, 1993, “The Definition of Morality”, in A. Phillips Griffiths (ed.), 1993, Ethics: Philosophy Supplement 35, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–44. (Scholar)
- Smart, J.J.C., 1956, “Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism”, Philosophical Quarterly, 6(25): 344–354. (Scholar)
- Sprigge, Timothy, 1964, “Definition of a Moral Judgment”, Philosophy, 39(150): 301–322. (Scholar)
- Strawson, Peter, 1961, “Social Morality and Individual Ideal”, Philosophy, 36(136): 1–17. (Scholar)
- Thomson, J.J. and G. Dworkin (eds.), 1968, Ethics, New York: Harper & Row. (Scholar)
- Toumlin, Stephen, 1950, An Examination of the Place of Reason in Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Wallace, G. and A.D.M. Walker (eds.), 1970, The Definition of Morality, London: Methuen. (Scholar)
- Warnock, Geoffrey, 1971, The Object of Morality, London: Methuen. (Scholar)
- Westermarck, Edward, 1960, Ethical Relativity, Paterson, N.J.: Littlefield, Adams. (Scholar)
- Whiteley, C.H., 1959, “On Defining ‘Morality’”, Analysis, 20(6): 141–4. (Scholar)
- Williams, Bernard, 1985, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, London: Fontana. (Scholar)
- Wong, David, 1984, Moral Relativity, Berkeley CA: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, Natural Moralities: A Defense of Pluralistic Relativism, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Wren, T.E. (ed.), 1990, The Moral Domain: Essays in the Ongoing Discussion Between Philosophy and the Social Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
