Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Natural Theology and Natural Religion" by Andrew Chignell and Derk Pereboom
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Abaci, Uygar, 2014, “Kant’s Only Possible Argument and
Chignell’s Real Harmony”, Kantian Review, 19(1):
1–25. (Scholar)
- –––, 2019, Kant’s Revolutionary Theory
of Modality, New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Adams, Marilyn McCord, 2000, Horrendous Evils and the Goodness
of God, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, Christ and Horrors, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Adams, Robert Merrihew, 1971, “The Logical Structure of
Anselm’s Arguments”, The Philosophical Review,
80(1): 28–54. (Scholar)
- –––, 1994, Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, “God, Possibility, and Kant”, Faith and Philosophy, 17(4): 425–40. (Scholar)
- Adamson, Peter, 2013, “From the Necessary Existent to
God”, in P. Adamson (ed.), Interpreting Avicenna,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 170–189. (Scholar)
- Al-Ghazali, 2000, The Incoherence of the Philosophers, M. E.
Marmura (ed. and trans.), Provo: Brigham Young University Press. (Scholar)
- Alston, William P., 1991, Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- Anselm, 2007, Anselm: Basic Writings, translated by
Thomas Williams, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing. (Scholar)
- Avicenna (Ibn Sina), [ISR], 2014, Ibn Sina’s Remarks and
Admonitions: ‘Physics’ and ‘Metaphysics’: An
Analysis and Annotated Translation, Shams C. Inati (ed. and
trans.), New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
- Barth, Karl, 1934, Nein! Antwort an Emil Brunner,
München: C. Kaiser. (Scholar)
- Berkeley, George, 1710 [1982], A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, Kenneth Winkler (ed.), Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing. (Scholar)
- Brooke, J. H., F. Watts, and R. R. Manning, 2013, The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Brown, C.M., 2008, “The Design Argument in Classical Hindu Thought”, International Journal of Hindu Studies, 12(2): 103–151. (Scholar)
- Carlson, Erik and Erik J. Olsson, 1998, “Is Our Existence in Need of Further Explanation?,” Inquiry, 41(3): 255–75. (Scholar)
- Charleton, Walter, 1654, The Darkness of Atheism Dispelled by the Light of Nature: A Physico-Theological Treatise, London. (Scholar)
- Chignell, Andrew, 2007, “Belief in Kant”, Philosophical Review, 116(3): 72–101. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Kant, Modality, and the Most Real Being”, Archiv Für Geschichte Der Philosophie, 91: 157–92. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Kant, Possibility, and the Threat of Spinoza”, Mind, 121(483): 635–75. (Scholar)
- –––, 2014, “Kant and the
‘Monstrous’ Ground of Possibility”, Kantian
Review, 19(1): 53–69. (Scholar)
- Clarke, Samuel, 1998, A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God and Other Writings, Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Collins, Robin, 2009, “The Teleological Argument: An Exploration of the Fine-Tuning of the Cosmos,” in Craig and Moreland (eds.), pp. 202–81 (Scholar)
- Copan, Paul and Paul K. Moser (eds.), 2003, The Rationality of Theism, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Craig, William Lane, 1979, The Kalam Cosmological
Argument (Library of Philosophy and Religion), New York:
Barnes&Noble Books. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000, “Timelessness and Omnitemporality”, Philosophia Christi, 2: 29–33. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, “Design and the Anthropic Fine-Tuning of the Universe”, in God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science, Neil A. Manson (ed.), London: Routledge, pp. 155–177. (Scholar)
- Craig, William Lane and J. P. Moreland (eds.), 2009, Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, Malden, MA: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Davis, Caroline Franks, 1989, The Evidential Force of Religious Experience, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- DeCruz, Helen, and Johan DeSmedt, 2010, A Natural History of
Natural Theology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Derham, William, 1713, Physico-Theology, Hildesheim:
Georg Olms Verlag, 1976. (Scholar)
- Descartes, René, [AT], Oeuvres de Descartes /
Publiées Par Charles Adam & Paul Tannery Sous Les Auspices
Du Minstère de L’instruction Publique, Paris: Vrin,
1897. (Scholar)
- Fisher, Mark, and Eric Watkins, 1998, “Kant on the Material Ground of Possibility: From ‘The Only Possible Argument’ to the ‘Critique of Pure Reason’”, Review of Metaphysics, 52(2): 369–95. (Scholar)
- Flew, Antony, 2008, There Is a God: How the World’s Most
Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind, New York: HarperOne. (Scholar)
- Forgie, J. William, 2003, “The Alleged Dependency of the Cosmological Argument on the Ontological”, Faith and Philosophy, 20(3): 364–70. (Scholar)
- Gaskin, J. C. A., 1978, Hume’s Philosophy of
Religion, London: Macmillan. (Scholar)
- Gauch Jr., Hugh, 2011, “Natural Theology’s Case for
Jesus’ Resurrection: Methodological and Statistical
Considerations”, Philosophia Christi, 13(2):
339–56. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, “The Methodology of Ramified Natural Theology”, Philosophia Christi, 15(2): 283–98. (Scholar)
- Grotius, Hugo, 1627, De veritate religionis Christianae,
Amsterdam: Henricum Wetstenium. (Scholar)
- Hauerwas, Stanley, 2001, With the Grain of the Universe: The Church’s Witness and Natural Theology, Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press. (Scholar)
- Hoffer, Noam, 2016, “The Relation Between God and the World in the PreCritical Kant: Was Kant a Spinozist?”, Kantian Review, 21(2): 185–210. (Scholar)
- Hoffman, Joshua, and Gary Rosenkrantz, 2002, The Divine Attributes, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Holder, Rodney, 2013, “Why We Need Ramified Natural Theology”, Philosophia Christi, 15(2): 271–82. (Scholar)
- Howson, Colin, 1991, “The ‘Old Evidence’
Problem,” British Journal for the Philosophy of
Science, 42(2): 547–55. (Scholar)
- Hume, David, 1779 [2007], Dialogues Concerning Natural
Religion and Other Writings (Cambridge Texts in the History of
Philosophy), Dorothy Coleman (ed.), Cambridge, New York: Cambridge
University Press. (Scholar)
- Kant, Immanuel, 1763, Der einzig mögliche Beweisgrund zu
einer Demonstration des Daseins Gottes (The Only Possible
Basis for a Demonstration of the Existence of God). Collected in
AK 2, pp. 63–163. (Scholar)
- –––, 1781/1787, Critique of Pure Reason, Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood (eds.), (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant), New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998. (Scholar)
- –––, [LPT] 1817, Vorlesungenüber die
philosophische Religionslehre (Lectures on Philosophical
Theology), publication of lecture notes from either 1783–84 or
1785–86, Leipzig: Franz, second edition 1830. Collected in AK
28, pp. 988–1529; all the quotations from these lectures cited
in the above entry were translated by the authors. (Scholar)
- –––, [AK] 1900, Königlichen Preußischen
(later Deutschen) Akademie der Wissenschaften (ed.), Kants gesammelte
Schriften, Berlin: Georg Reimer (later Walter De Gruyter). References
to this are by volume and page number. (Scholar)
- –––, [RRT] 1996, Religion and Rational Theology, Allen W. Wood (ed.) and George di Giovanni (trans.), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Kotzen, Matthew, 2012, “Selection Biases in Likelihood Arguments,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63(4): 825–39. (Scholar)
- Kwan, Kai–Man, 2006, “Can Religious Experience Provide
Justification for Belief in the Existence of God? The Debate in
Contemporary Analytic Philosophy”, Philosophy Compass,
1(6): 640–61. (Scholar)
- Leech, David, 2013, The Hammer of the Cartesians: Henry
More’s Philosophy of Spirit and the Origins of Modern
Atheism, Leuven: Peeters. (Scholar)
- Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, 1676, “Two Notations for
Discussion with Spinoza”, in Leibniz [PP]: 167–8. (Scholar)
- –––, 1677, “Letter to Arnold
Eckhard”, in Leibniz [PP]: 177–80. (Scholar)
- –––, 1678, “Letter to Countess Elizabeth,
On God and Formal Logic”, in Leibniz [PE]: 237–39. (Scholar)
- –––, 1684, “Meditations on Knowledge, Truth, and Ideas”, in Leibniz [PP]: 292–3. (Scholar)
- –––, 1692, “Critical Thoughts on the
General Part of the Principles of Descartes”, in Leibniz [PP]:
386. (Scholar)
- –––, 1697, “On the Ultimate Origination of
Things”, in Leibniz [PE]: 149–55. (Scholar)
- –––, 1699, “From the Letters to Thomas
Burnett, On Substance”, in Leibniz [PE]: 149–5. (Scholar)
- –––, 1714, “Monadology”, in Leibniz [PP]: 643–653. (Scholar)
- –––, [PP], Philosophical Papers and
Letters, second edition, Leroy E. Loemker (ed.), Volume 8 (32),
Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1969.
- –––, [PE], Philosophical Essays,
translated by Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber, 1st edition,
Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1989.
- Leslie, John, 1998, Universes, London; New York:
Routledge. (Scholar)
- Lewis, David, 1970, “Anselm and Actuality”, Noûs, 4(2): 175–88. (Scholar)
- Locke, John, 1695, The Reasonableness of Christianity as
Delivered in the Scriptures, edited by John C Higgins-Biddle,
Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- MacDonald, Scott, 1998, “Natural Theology”,
Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, New York:
Routledge. (Scholar)
- Mackie, J., 1982, The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and against the Existence of God, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Manson, Neil A. (ed.), 2003, God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Mayer, Toby, 2001, “Avicenna’s Burhan
al-Siddiqin,” Journal of Islamic Studies, 12:
18–39. (Scholar)
- Montaigne, Michel de, 1580, “Apology for Raymond
Sebond,” in The Essays of Michel de Montaigne, Bk II,
Ch. XII, edited by M. A. Screech, London: Allen Lane: Penguin Press,
1991. (Scholar)
- Monton, Bradley, 2006, “God, Fine-Tuning, and the Problem of Old Evidence,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57(2): 405–24. (Scholar)
- Moreland, J. P., 2008, Consciousness and the Existence of God: A Theistic Argument, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Murphy, Mark C., 2017, God’s Own Ethics: Norms of Divine
Agency and the Argument from Evil, New York: Oxford University
Press. (Scholar)
- Newman, Robert C., John A. Bloom, and Hugh G. Gauch Jr., 2003,
“Public Theology and Prophecy Data: Factual Evidence That Counts
for the Biblical World View”, Journal of the Evangelical
Theological Society, 46(1): 79–110. (Scholar)
- O’Connor, Timothy, 2008, Theism and Ultimate Explanation, London: Wiley Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Oberst, Michael, 2018, “Kant on Contradiction, Conceptual Content, and the Ens Realissimum,” Kant Yearbook, 10(1): 85–103. (Scholar)
- –––, 2020, “The Possibility Proof is not
what Remains from Kant’s Beweisgrund”, Kantian
Review, 25(2):219–42. (Scholar)
- Olding, Alan, 1990, Modern Biology and Natural Theology, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Oppy, Graham, 1996, Ontological Arguments and Belief in God, 1st edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003, “Modal Theistic
Arguments”, Sophia, 32(2): 17–24. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, Arguing About Gods, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Cosmological Arguments”, Noûs, 33(1): 31–48. (Scholar)
- Paley, William, 1794, A View of the Evidences of
Christianity, London: J. Davis/R. Faulder. (Scholar)
- –––, 1802, Natural Theology; Or, Evidence of
the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, London: Wilks and
Taylor. (Scholar)
- Pasternack, Lawrence, 2001, “The Ens Realissimum and
Necessary Being in the Critique of Pure Reason”, Religious
Studies, 37(4): 467–74. (Scholar)
- Pereboom, Derk, 1996, “Early Modern Philosophical
Theology”, in A Companion to the Philosophy of
Religion, Philip Quinn and Charles Taliaferro (eds.),
1st edition, Oxford: Blackwell, 103–10. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “Early Modern Philosophical
Theology”, in A Companion to the Philosophy of
Religion, edited by Philip Quinn, Charles Taliaferro, and Paul
Draper, 2nd edition, Oxford: Blackwell, 114–23. (Scholar)
- Plantinga, Alvin, 1979, “Is Belief in God Rational?”, in Rationality and Religious Belief, Notre Dame, IN.: University of Notre Dame Press, 7–27. (Scholar)
- –––, 1981, “Is Belief in God Properly Basic?” Noûs, 15(1): 41–51. (Scholar)
- –––, 1984, “Reason and Belief in
God”, in Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in
God, Notre Dame, IN.: University of Notre Dame Press. (Scholar)
- Plantinga, Alvin and Nicholas Wolterstorff (eds.), 1983, Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. (Scholar)
- Polkinghorne, John, 2009, Theology in the Context of
Science, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
- Proops, Ian, 2014, “Kant on the Cosmological Argument”, Philosophers’ Imprint, 14(12): 1–21. (Scholar)
- Pruss, Alexander, 2006, The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Reassessment, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Rota, Michael, 2005, “Multiple Universes and the Fine-tuning Argument: A Response to Rodney Holder,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 86: 556–76. (Scholar)
- Rowe, William L., 1975, The Cosmological Argument, Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Sebond, Raymond, 1436 [1569], “La Theologie Naturelle de
Raymond Sebond, Traduicte Nouvellement en François Par Messier
Michel, Seigneur de Montaigne”, translated by Michel de
Montaigne, 1569; translation edited by Dr Armaingaud, Paris: Conard,
1935. (Scholar)
- Sedley, David, 2008, Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press. (Scholar)
- Sober, Elliot, 2003, “The Design Argument”, in Manson (ed.) 2003: 27–54. (Scholar)
- Speaks, Jeffrey, 2018, The Greatest Possible Being, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Stang, Nicholas F., 2010, “Kant’s Possibility
Proof”, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 27(3):
275–99. (Scholar)
- Stang, Nicholas F., 2016, Kant’s Modal Metaphysics,
Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Stump, Eleonore, 2010, Wandering in Darkness: Narrative and the Problem of Suffering, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Sudduth, Michael, 2009, The Reformed Objection to Natural Theology, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. (Scholar)
- Swinburne, Richard, 2003, The Resurrection of God Incarnate, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, The Existence of God, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Taliaferro, Charles, 2005, Evidence and Faith: Philosophy and Religion since the Seventeenth Century, The Evolution of Modern Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Van Cleve, James, 1999, Problems from Kant, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Van Inwagen, Peter, 1977, “Ontological Arguments”, Noûs, 11(4): 375–95. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, “Some Remarks on the Modal Ontological Argument”, Philo, 12(2): 217–27. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Three Versions of the Ontological Argument”, in Ontological Proofs Today, edited by Miroslaw Szatkowski, Heusenstamm: Ontos Verlag, 143–162. (Scholar)
- White, Roger, 2000, “Fine-Tuning and Multiple Universes”, Noûs, 34(2): 260–76. (Scholar)
- Wolterstorff, Nicholas, 1984, “Introduction”, in
Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God, Notre Dame,
IN.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1–15. (Scholar)
- Yong, Peter, 2014, “God, Totality and Possibility in
Kant’s Only Possible Argument”, Kantian Review,
19(1): 27–51. (Scholar)