Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Simpson’s Paradox" by Gary Malinas and John Bigelow

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

  • Axelrod, R., 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
  • Bickel, P. J., Hjammel, E. A., and O’Connell, J. W., 1975, “Sex Bias in Graduate Admissions: Data From Berkeley”, Science, 187: 398–404. (Scholar)
  • Blyth, C. R., 1972, “On Simpson’s Paradox and the Sure Thing Principle”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67: 364–366. (Scholar)
  • Cartwright, N., 1979, “Causal laws and effective strategies”, Noûs, 13 (4): 419–437. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2001, “What is wrong with Bayes Nets?”, The Monist, 84 (2): 242–265. Reprinted in Probability is the Very Guide of Life, H. E. Kyburg, Jr. and M. Thalos (eds.), Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court, 2003, 253–275. (Scholar)
  • Cohen, M. R., and Nagel, E., 1934, An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co. (Scholar)
  • Dawid, A. P., 1979, “Conditional independence in statistical theory,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B), 41: 1–15. (Scholar)
  • Dupre, J. and Cartwright, N., 1988, “Probability and causality: Why Hume and indeterminism don’t mix”, Noûs, 22: 521–536. (Scholar)
  • Eells, E., 1987, “Cartwright and Otte on Simpson’s Paradox,” Philosophy of Science, 54: 233–243. (Scholar)
  • Glymour, C. and Meek, C., 1994, “Conditioning and Intervening”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45: 1001–1021. (Scholar)
  • Hardcastle, V.G., 1991, “Partitions, probabilistic causal laws, and Simpson’s Paradox,” Synthese, 86: 209–228. (Scholar)
  • Hesslow, G., 1976, “Discussion: Two notes on the probabilistic approach to causality,” Philosophy of Science, 43: 290–292. (Scholar)
  • Lindly, D. V., and Novick, M. R., 1981, “The role of exchangeability in inference”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 9: 45–58. (Scholar)
  • Malinas, G., 1997, “Simpson’s Paradox and the wayward researcher”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 75: 343–359. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2001, “Simpson’s Paradox: A logically benign, empirically treacherous hydra”, The Monist, 84 (2): 265–284. Reprinted in Probability Is the Very Guide of Life, Henry E. Kyburg, Jr. and Mariam Thalos (eds.), Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court, 2003, 165–182. (Scholar)
  • Mittal, Y., 1991, “Homogeneity of subpopulations and Simpson’s Paradox”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86: 167–172. (Scholar)
  • Otte, R., 1985, “Probabilistic causality and Simpson’s Paradox”, Philosophy of Science, 52: 110–125. (Scholar)
  • Pearl, J., 1988, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1993, “Comment: Graphical Models, Causality, and Intervention”, Statistical Science, 8: 266–269. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000, Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference, New York, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Second Edition, 2009.] (Scholar)
  • –––, 2014, “Comment: Understanding Simpson’s Paradox”, The American Statistician, 68: 8–13. (Scholar)
  • Reichenbach, H., 1971, The Direction of Time, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
  • Savage, L. J., 1954, The Foundations of Statistics, New York: John Wiley and Sons. (Scholar)
  • Simpson, E.H., 1951, “The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B), 13: 238–241. (Scholar)
  • Skyrms, B., 1980, Causal Necessity, New Haven; Yale University Press. (Scholar)
  • Sober, E., 1993, The Nature of Selection, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1993, Philosophy of Biology, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Sober, E. and D. S. Wilson, 1998,Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behaviour, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Spohn, W., 2001, “Bayesian nets are all there is to causality”, in Stochastic Dependence and Causality, D. Constantini, M. C. Galavotti, and P. Suppes (eds.), Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
  • Sunder, S., 1983, “Simpson’s reversal paradox and cost allocations”, Journal of Accounting Research, 21: 222–233. (Scholar)
  • Suppes, P., 1970, A Probabilistic Theory of Causality, Amsterdam; North-Holland Publishing Co.. (Scholar)
  • Thalos, M., 2003, “The Reduction of Causation”, in H. Kyburg and M. Thalos (eds.), Probability is the Very Guide of Life: The Philosophical Uses of Chance, Chicago: Open Court. (Scholar)
  • Thornton, R. J., and Innes, J. T., 1985, “On Simpson’s Paradox in economic statistics”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 47: 387–394. (Scholar)
  • Van Frassen, B. C., 1989, Laws and Symmetry, Oxford: Clarendon. (Scholar)
  • Yule, G. H., 1903, “Notes on the theory of association of attributes in Statistics”, Biometrika, 2: 121–134. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Mar 17 11:01:30 2019